aviation and climate change: thoughts on uk policy
DESCRIPTION
Aviation and climate change: thoughts on UK policy. Peter Lockley Ubina Environmental Consulting Saturday 18 th June 2011. Contents. The Climate Change Act Aviation emissions – do they fit? 2050 target and the CCC Report Is the 2050 target the right one? Cleaner planes? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Aviation and climate change: thoughts on UK
policy
Peter LockleyUbina Environmental Consulting
Saturday 18th June 2011
Contents
• The Climate Change Act
• Aviation emissions – do they fit?
• 2050 target and the CCC Report
• Is the 2050 target the right one?
• Cleaner planes?
• Implications for policy
The Climate Change Act 2008
– First climate change target enshrined in legislation:• 80% cut on 1990 levels by 2050• 5-year budgets to keep UK on track to meet target• Advice of Committee on Climate Change on budgets
etc
– International aviation (+shipping) excluded, but:• Budgets must be set ‘taking into account’ IAS• Govt must include by end of 2012, or say why not.
Q: How does aviation fit into the budget?
A: With difficulty.• Overall 80% cut in 2050 requires:
– International shipping no higher than 2005 levels;
– Non-CO2 emissions cut by 70% (maximum feasible);
– International aviation no higher than 2005 levels;– All other sectors reduce emissions by c.90%
• No offsets available by 2050• Cost of forcing extra cuts in other sectors?
2050 target and CCC report• Jan 2009: previous Govt set target for absolute
emissions to be no higher in 2050 than 2005• Dec 2009: CCC Report on how to meet the target:
– 0.8% annual improvement in fuel efficiency ‘likely’– Passenger numbers can increase to 370 mppa by
2050 – MAX compatible with target
– cf ATWP: 470 mppa by 2030, 570 by 2050.
– Even with no new runways, and C price rising to £200/t in 2050, demand = 425 mppa.
Is ‘2005 levels’ the right target?
• Impact on other sectors• Shipping may be higher than assumed by
CCC – report due this year
• Aviation non-CO2 impacts:
– NOx at altitude, cirrus, contrails
– Problems with RFI, but new work on GWP(100) suggests multiplier of 2.
– So… cut aviation target in half? Or other sectors cut by 95%?!
CCC on non-CO2 effects
• “As scientific understanding develops, and to the extent that this confirms the significant additional warming from aviation non-CO2 effects, it is very likely that these will become fully accounted for…”
• “It is reasonable to assume… that some additional emissions reduction effort would be required in aviation.”
• IMPLIES that stabilisation is a bare minimum acceptable target for aviation.
Cleaner planes: in theory
Source: Sustainable Aviation Roadmap 2008
Cleaner planes: in practiceTrends in UK terminal passengers and emissions from UK aviation
Source: CAA airport Statistics and UK National GHG Inventory data (DECC)
“A genuinely sustainable framework”
• Reaffirm 2050 target, with a commitment to regular review of adequacy in light of:– Non-CO2 science;– Trends in other sectors.
• Immediate freeze on airport expansion:– ATWP is dead, so no policy basis to support expansion– Current permitted expansion = c.370mppa (AEF/WWF)– Growth only in return for proven fuel efficiency gains– New slots auctioned to highest bidder every 5 or 10 years –
if any available?• Increase in APD, strengthening of EU ETS
when possible, package of support for alternatives.