awr connected application note - awrcorp.com · antenna magus provides a structured catalog of...
TRANSCRIPT
AWR Connected™
Application Note
INTRODUCTIONAutomated synthesis of microwave devices has been gaining in popularity in CAE
applications over the past decade. Antenna Magus now brings this capability to the
fi eld of antenna design. Antenna Magus provides a structured catalog of antennas
(monitor image below) with concise documentation, robust design algorithms, and
export models. The documentation is researched, structured, referenced, and
maintained to ensure that documentation on each antenna is well suited to the task at
hand. The design algorithms produce working parameter sets based on user-defi ned
objectives almost instantly. Antennas designed in Antenna Magus can be exported as
models to AWR’s Microwave Offi ce™/AXIEM® software for analysis and integration
with circuits and other system components. All models are fully parametric and can be
optimized together with other project components. This truly integrates the design of
the antenna into the overall design of the device and the system.
A DESIGN FLOW FOR ANTENNA SYNTHESISThe advantages of having access to information as well as various automated design
algorithms and export models can be enormous, enabling the engineer to quickly
evaluate different antenna topologies and choose an appropriate topology for the
task at hand. This application note shows how Antenna Magus can be used to explore
various antenna options during the early stages of the design and how specifi c designs
can be exported from Antenna Magus and integrated into Microwave Offi ce/AXIEM.
Design Flow for Base Station Antenna
The “Find” view within Antenna Magus software expedites antenna selection.
The “Find” view within Antenna Magus software expedites antenna selection.
EXAMPLE 1: EARLY ANTENNA
EXPLORATION AND DESIGNConsider for purposes of this example a
WAN base station antenna. The objective
is to ensure adequate signal coverage for
several homes in an area using a single
base station. Design engineers working
without Antenna Magus would typically
start by considering a selection of antenna
topologies with which they are familiar and
deciding if one of them would be a sensible
choice for the design at hand. With
Antenna Magus, engineers can search
for and explore a variety of different
options, reading about and comparing
them effi ciently, including antennas that
they have never seen before. Antenna
Magus also includes a toolbox of utilities,
like a free space path loss calculator
(Friis equation), to aid in deriving antenna
requirements from system specifi cations. System and antenna requirements such as
operating frequency, gain, bandwidth, impedance, required form factor, and cost form
the specifi cations that are used together with Antenna Magus to select an appropriate
antenna topology.
The calculation (Figure 1) in this example shows that if -60dBm power is required
from a 16dBi receive antenna at a 1km distance from a 5mW transmitter, then a
transmit antenna with a gain of 18dBi in the directions of required coverage will be
needed. In order to provide the required coverage, the pattern shape of the transmit
antenna is distinctive – a high gain fan-shaped beam would be ideal. The database
can be prioritized for suitable topologies using the keywords “fan beam” and “high
gain” (defi ned as antennas with gain
typically above 15dBi). This instantly
provides six topology options. As shown
in Figure 2, a summary of performance
information for four of the six probable
antennas is shown. Based on data from
the quick-summary information page, the
“linear resonant waveguide slot array”
and “resonant series-fed rectangular
microstrip patch array” antennas could
be candidates for further investigation,
as they appear to provide suffi cient gain
and the correct pattern shape.
Using the Antenna Magus Information
Browser, a side-by-side comparison of
these two antennas can be obtained
(Figure 3). The information in the
comparison highlights the advantages,
Figure 1: Information panel.
Figure 2: Select subset of topologies.
Figure 3: Two possible antenna topologies.
Select subset of topologies.
Figure 4: Performance data.
Figure 5: Capacitive disc-fed patch.
disadvantages, and capabilities of the topologies, helping the user select the best option.
In order to gain even deeper insight into the antennas, designs can be performed with
the click of a button for specifi c performance objectives for each of the antennas and
the specifi c physical dimensions and performances can be compared. This is illustrated
by the screenshot of the design of the linear resonant waveguide slot array (Figure 4).
The next step in the investigation and design process is to then export the model into
Microwave Offi ce/AXIEM for further analysis and optimization.
EXAMPLE 2: DESIGN AND EXPORTING OF AN ANTENNAOften a design engineer uncovers that the initial design provides insuffi cient
performance bandwidth. Usually the solution to this problem is to then construct
a larger structure such that it resonates over the entire band. But when additional
constraints like beam uniformity, size, and manufacturing costs are added, the
challenge becomes more perplexing. In this example, Antenna Magus is again used
to address the design challenge. The specifi cation now requires a planar antenna
with a gain of 6dBi that operates between 2.4GHz and 2.6GHz. Generally speaking,
pin-fed patch antennas have narrow bandwidth and would not be able to achieve this
specifi cation. Yet when searching through the Antenna Magus database for a
moderate bandwidth patch antenna, some EM-coupled feed options are suggested.
One such option is the “capacitive disc-fed rectangular patch antenna” (Figure 5).
In this antenna’s information document, the feed-disc is described to be capacitively
coupled to the patch along a radiating edge, effectively adding a capacitive component
to the input impedance and cancelling out the inductance of the feed-pin. This allows
Figure 6: The results for a patch designed on a 1.5mm FR4 for the top substrate and 6mm (—) and 8mm (—) air for the bottom substrate.
the use of thicker substrates (typically two layers), which in turn lowers the effective
dielectric constant, thus increasing the bandwidth of the patch antenna. It should be
noted that designing such an antenna without Antenna Magus is not a trivial task, as the
effective dielectric constant of a two-layer dielectric needs to be calculated and fi nding
the correct feed spacing for a good match will essentially be an optimization problem.
With Antenna Magus, the user is able to specify the bottom substrate height and all the
top substrate parameters, and the antenna can be designed within a few seconds.
The performance of a design can easily be estimated and the results from different
designs can be compared on the same graph. Figure 6 shows the estimated
performance for two different design cases where the top substrate properties were
kept constant, while the required height of the bottom air substrate was increased
from 6mm to 10mm. The refl ection coeffi cient graph clearly shows how the bandwidth
increases with the bottom substrate thickness. At this point
engineers can be confi dent that the antenna will operate within
specifi cation and that the design is ready to be exported to the
AWR Design Environment™. The exported model (Figure 7)
contains all the parameter values within the EM schematic.
The mesh settings are defi ned to give
accurate results in a reasonable time.
Certain general graphs and measure-
ments, such as S11 vs. frequency, gain
vs. frequency, etc., are predefi ned. The
project is therefore ready to run and all
parameters are available if changes are
necessary. Because all parameters are
defi ned in Microwave Offi ce/AXIEM, the
feed spacing, for instance, can be directly
edited in the AWR Design Environment
model defi nition to try and achieve a
higher input resistance.
CONCLUSIONAntenna Magus is ideal for quickly finding a first order design, assessing its
performance and easily exporting parameterized models to Microwave Office/
AXIEM, where parameters can be edited and simulated to find the best possible
solution for a wide range of problems.
Figure 7: 3D EM view and S11 results in AWR for the exported model.
Copyright © 2012 AWR Corporation. All rights reserved. AWR and AXIEM are registered trademarks and the AWR logo, AWR Connected, Microwave Offi ce and AWR Design Environment are trademarks of AWR Corporation. Other product and company names listed are trademarks or trade names of their respective companies. AN-AM-2012.11.26
AWR Corporation | www.awrcorp.com [email protected] | +1 (310) 726-3000