aws re:invent re:cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

71

Upload: amazon-web-services-korea

Post on 11-Jul-2015

471 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 2: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Whether you're a startup getting to profitability or an enterprise

optimizing spend, it pays to run cost-efficient architectures on AWS.

Building on last year's popular foundation of how to reduce waste

and fine-tune your AWS spending, this session reviews a wide range

of cost planning, monitoring, and optimization strategies, featuring

real-world experience from AWS customer Adobe Systems. With the

massive growth of subscribers to Adobe's Creative Cloud, Adobe's

footprint in AWS continues to expand. We will discuss the techniques

used to optimize and manage costs, while maximizing performance

and improving resiliency.

When traditional application and operating practices are used in

cloud deployments, immediate benefits occur in speed of

deployment, automation, and transparency of costs. The next step is

a re-architecture of the application to be cloud-native, and significant

operating cost reductions can help justify this development work.

Cloud-native applications are dynamic and use ephemeral resources

that customers are only charged for when the resources are in use.

Page 3: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

With AWS, you can reduce capital costs, lower your overall bill, and

match your expense to your usage. This session describes how to

calculate the total cost of ownership (TCO) for deploying solutions on

AWS vs. on-premises or at a colocation facility, as well as how to

address common pitfalls in building a TCO analysis. The session

presents and models customer examples.

This session is a deep dive into techniques used by successful

customers who optimized their use of AWS. Learn tricks and hear

tips you can implement right away to reduce waste, choose the most

efficient instance, and fine-tune your spending; often with improved

performance and a better end-customer experience. We showcase

innovative approaches and demonstrate easily applicable methods to

save you time and money with Amazon EC2, Amazon S3, and a host

of other services.

Page 4: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

In this session, you learn how you can leverage AWS services

together with third-party storage appliances and gateways to

automate your backup and recovery processes so that they are not

only less complex and lightweight, but also easy to manage and

maintain. We demonstrate how to manage data flow from on-

premises systems to the cloud and how to leverage storage

gateways. You also learn best practices for quick implementation,

reducing TCO, and automating lifecycle management.

In the event of a disaster, you need to be able to recover lost data

quickly to ensure business continuity. For critical applications,

keeping your time to recover and data loss to a minimum as well as

optimizing your overall capital expense can be challenging. This

session presents AWS features and services along with Disaster

Recovery architectures that you can leverage when building highly

available and disaster resilient applications. We will provide

recommendations on how to improve your Disaster Recovery plan

and discuss example scenarios showing how to recover from a

disaster.

Page 5: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 6: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Pay as you go, no up-front investments

• Low ongoing cost

• Flexible capacity

• Speed, agility, and innovation

• Focus on your business

• Go global in minutes

Page 7: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 8: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Strategy 1:

Do nothing

Page 9: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Ecosystem

Global Footprint

New Features

New Services

More AWS

Usage

More

Infrastructure

Lower

Infrastructure

Costs

Reduced

Prices

More

Customers Infrastructure

Innovation

45 price

reductions

since 2006 Economies

of Scale

Page 10: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Strategy 2:

Do almost nothing

Page 11: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/trustedadvisor/

Free with Business or Enterprise Support

Page 12: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Strategy 3:

Optimize Architecture

Page 13: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 14: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Cloud-Ready Cloud-Aware Cloud-Native

• Run AWS like a virtual colocation

(Fork-lift)

• Does not optimize for on-demand (overprovisioned)

• Minor modifications to improve

cloud usage

• Automating servers can lower operational burden

• Redesign with AWS in mind

(high effort)

• Embrace scalable services (reduce admin)

• EC2, EBS

• HAProxy on EC2

• MySQL on EC2

• Cassandra, Hadoop on EC2

• ActiveMQ/Redis/KAFKA on EC2 • Chef on EC2

• EC2, EBS, S3, CloudFront

• ELB, Route53(round-robin)

• Multi-AZ RDS + read replica

• ElastiCache Redis • OpsWorks

• Autoscaling, Self-healing

• Route53(LBR)

• RDS Aurora, RedShift

• DynamoDB, EMR

• SQS, SNS, Kinesis

• CloudFormation, Elastic Beanstalk

Development Cost Scalability/Availability Management Cost

Page 15: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 16: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Developer, test, training instances

• Use simple instance start and stop

• Or tear down and build up all together

• Instances are disposable

• Automate, automate, automate: – AWS CloudFormation

– Weekend/off-hours scripts

– Use tags

Page 17: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Monday Friday End of Vacation Season 35% saved

Page 18: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Automatic resizing of compute clusters

based on demand

Trigger autoscaling

policy

Feature Details

Control Define minimum and maximum instance pool sizes and when scaling and cool down occurs.

Integrated to Amazon CloudWatch

Use metrics gathered by CloudWatch to drive scaling.

Instance types Run Auto Scaling for On-Demand and Spot Instances. Compatible with VPC.

AWS autoscaling create-autoscaling-group

— Auto Scaling-group-name MyGroup

— Launch-configuration-name MyConfig

— Min size 4

— Max size 200 — Availability Zones us-west-2c

Amazon

CloudWatch

Page 19: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Cloud capacity used is maybe half average DC capacity

Page 20: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Mad scramble to add more DC capacity during launch phase outages

Page 21: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Capacity wasted on failed launch magnifies the losses

Page 22: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Start

Choose an instance

that best meets your

basic requirements

Start with memory & then

choose closest virtual

cores

Look for peak IOPS

storage requirements

Tune

Change instance size up

or down based upon

monitoring

Use CloudWatch &

Trusted Advisor to assess

Roll-Out

Run multiple instances

in multiple Availability

Zones

Page 23: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

1, 1.7, $0.060 1, 3.75, $0.113

2, 3.75, $0.145 2, 7.5, $0.225

2, 17.1, $0.410

4, 7, $0.300

4, 15, $0.450

4, 34.2, $0.820

8, 15, $0.600

8, 30, $0.900

8, 68.4, $1.640

4, 30.5, $0.853

8, 61, 1.705

16, 30, $1.200 32, 60, $2.400

32, 244, $3.500

16, 122, $3.410

16, 117, $4.600

32, 244, $6.820

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

On Demand Prices shown (N.Virginia region), only latest generation instances (M3,C3) shown where applicable, GPU and Micro instances not shown above

Memory-Optimized Instances

Compute-Optimized Instances

General Purpose Instances

Storage-Optimized Instances

vCPU

RA

M

Page 24: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

More small instances vs. Less large instances

29 m3.xlarge

= 29 x $0.280/hour

= $8.12/hour

69 m3.medium

= 69 x $0.070/hour

= $4.83/hour

40%

Savings

Page 25: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49

We

b S

erv

ers

Week

50% Savings Weekly CPU Load

Page 26: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Scale up/down

by 70%+

Move to Load-Based

Scaling

50% Savings

Page 27: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Auto Scaling in the Amazon Cloud

http://techblog.netflix.com/2012/01/auto-scaling-in-amazon-cloud.html

Reactive Auto Scaling saves around 50%

Requests

Servers

50% Savings

Page 28: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Predictive Auto Scaling saves around 70%

Load prediction

Autoscaling Plan

Scryer: Netflix’s Predictive Auto Scaling Engine

http://goo.gl/iFefxJ

70% Savings

Page 29: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

1y RI

Break even

3y RI

Break even

Page 30: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• No Upfront

You pay nothing upfront but commit to pay for the Reserved Instance over the

course of the Reserved Instance term, with discounts (typically about 30%)

when compared to On-Demand. This option is offered with a one year term

• Partial Upfront

You pay for a portion of the Reserved Instance upfront, and then pay for the

remainder over the course of the one or three year term. This option balances

the RI payments between upfront and hourly.

• All Upfront

You pay for the entire Reserved Instance term (one or three years) with one

upfront payment and get the best effective hourly price when compared to

On-Demand.

Page 31: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

62%

Savings

77%

Savings

Page 32: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

47%

Savings

65%

Savings

Page 33: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

39%

Savings

63%

Savings

Page 34: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Can be moved between AZs

• Can be moved between

EC2-Classic and EC2-VPC platforms

• Size can be modified within the

same instance family

Page 35: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Price based on supply/demand

• You choose your maximum price/hour

• Your instance is started if the Spot price is lower

• Your instance is terminated if

the Spot price is higher

• But: You did plan for fault tolerance, didn’t you?

Page 36: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

On-Demand:

$0.24

$0.028 (11.7%) $0.026 (10.8%)

90%

Savings

Page 37: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Very dynamic pricing

• Opportunity to save 80-90% cost – But there are risks

• Different prices per AZ

• Leverage Auto Scaling! – One group with Spot Instances

– One group with On-Demand

– Get the best of both worlds

• Coming soon: 2-minute Spot interruption warnings

Page 38: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Reduced redundancy storage class – 99.99% durability vs. 99.999999999%

– Up to 20% savings

– Everything that is easy to reproduce

– Use Amazon SNS lost object notifications

• Amazon Glacier storage class – Same 99.999999999% durability

– 3 to 5 hours restore time

– Up to 64% savings

– Archiving, long-term backups, and old data

• Use life-cycle rules

64%

Savings

20%

Savings

Page 39: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Read/write capacity units (CUs) determine

most of DynamoDB cost

• By optimizing CUs, you can save a lot of money

• But: – Need to provision enough capacity to not run into capacity errors

– Need to prepare for peaks

– Need to constantly monitor/adjust

Page 40: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Use caching to save read capacity units – Local RAM caches at app server instances

– Check out Amazon ElastiCache

• Think of strategies for optimizing CU use – Use multiple tables to support varied access patterns

– Understand access patterns for time series data

– Compress large attribute values

• Use Amazon SQS to buffer over-capacity writes

Page 41: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

EC2

1. 2.

3. 4.

Page 42: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 43: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Caching/Optimization:

80% saved

Cache

flush

Dynamic

DynamoDB:

20% saved

Growth +

new features

80%

Savings

20%

Savings

Page 44: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• The more you can offload, the less

infrastructure you need to maintain, scale,

and pay for

• Three easy ways to offload: – Use Amazon CloudFront

– Introduce caching

– Leverage existing Amazon web services

Page 45: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 46: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Amazon RDS, Amazon DynamoDB or Amazon

ElastiCache for Redis, Amazon Redshift – Instead of running your own database

• Amazon CloudSearch – Instead of running your own search engine

• Amazon Elastic Transcoder

• Amazon Elastic MapReduce

• Amazon Cognito, Amazon SQS, Amazon SNS,

Amazon Simple Workflow Service, Amazon SES,

Amazon Kinesis, and more …

Page 47: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

November 14, 2014 | Las Vegas

Adrian Cockcroft @adrianco, Battery Ventures

Page 48: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

@adrianco

Bill

Now Next

Month Ages Ago

Lease Building

Install AC etc.

Rack and Stack

Private Cloud SW

Run My Stuff

Data Center Up-Front Costs

Page 49: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

0

25

50

75

100

125

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Three Years Halving Every 18mo = maybe 40% overall savings

Data shown is purely illustrative

Page 50: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Older m1/m2 families

• Slower CPUs

• Higher response times

• Smaller caches (6MB)

• Oldest m1.xlarge

– 15G/8.5ECU/35c 23ECU/$

• Old m2.xlarge

– 17G/6.5ECU/25c 26ECU/$

New m3 family

• Faster CPUs

• Lower response times

• Larger caches (20MB)

• Java perf ratio > ECU

• New m3.xlarge

– 15G/13ECU/28c 46ECU/$

• 77% better ECU/$

• Deploy fewer instances

Page 51: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 52: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 53: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Combinations

Page 54: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

100

70 70 70

30 30 25

0

25

50

75

100

125

Base Price Rightsized Seasonal Daily Scaling Reserved Tech Refresh Price Cuts

Traditional application using AWS heavy-use reservations

Base price is for capacity bought up-front

Page 55: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

100

70

50

35 25 20 15

0

25

50

75

100

125

Base Price Rightsized Seasonal Daily Scaling Reserved Tech Refresh Price Cuts

Cloud-native application partially optimized light use reservations

Page 56: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

100

50

25

12 8 6 4 0

25

50

75

100

125

Base Price Rightsized Seasonal Daily Scaling Reserved Tech Refresh Price Cuts

Cloud-native application fully optimized autoscaling mixed reservation use costs 4% of base price over three years!

Page 57: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Business logic isolation in stateless micro-services

• Immutable code with instant rollback

• Autoscaled capacity and deployment updates

• Distributed across availability zones and regions

• De-normalized single function NoSQL data stores

• See over 40 NetflixOSS projects at netflix.github.com

• Get “technical indigestion” trying to keep up with

techblog.netflix.com

Page 58: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 59: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 60: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

AdRoll, an online advertising platform, serves 50

billion impressions a day worldwide with its global

retargeting platforms.

We spend more on snacks

than we do on Amazon

DynamoDB.

• Needed high-performance, flexible

platform to swiftly sync data for worldwide

audience

• Processes 50 TB of data a day

• Serves 50 billion impressions a day

• Stores 1.5 PB of data

• Worldwide deployment minimizes latency

Valentino Volonghi

CTO, Adroll

“ Adroll Uses AWS to Grow by More Than 15,000% in a Year

Page 61: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Handle 150TB/day

• Low <5ms response time

• 1,000,000+ global requests/second

• 100B items

Page 62: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

• Memcache

aOpen source

aMature

aBlazingly fast

rNo strong guarantees

• Redis

aOpen source

rStorage scale

rNot really distributed

rOperationally intense.

• Hbase (we still use this)

aOpen source

aMaturing quickly

aGreat scale

rReally hard to operate

a

a

a

r

Page 64: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Data Collection = Batch Layer Bidding = Speed Layer

Data Collection

Data Storage

Global

Distribution

Bid Storage

Bidding

Page 65: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

US East region

Availability Zone Availability Zone

Elastic Load Balancing

instances instances Auto Scaling group

Amazon S3 Amazon Kinesis

Page 66: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

US East region

Availability Zone Availability Zone

Elastic Load Balancing

instances instances Auto Scaling group

Amazon S3 Amazon Kinesis

Apache Storm DynamoDB

US West region

EU West region

DynamoDB

DynamoDB

Page 67: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Bidding Data Collection US East region

Availability Zone Availability Zone

Elastic Load Balancing

instances

instances

Auto Scaling group

Amazon S3

Amazon Kinesis

Apache Storm

DynamoDB

Availability Zone Availability Zone

Auto Scaling group

Elastic Load Balancing

Page 68: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Data Collection

Bidding

Ad Network 2Ad Network 1

Auto Scaling GroupAuto Scaling GroupAuto Scaling GroupAuto Scaling Group Auto Scaling GroupAuto Scaling Group

Auto Scaling GroupAuto Scaling Group Auto Scaling Group

Apache Storm

v2 V3 V3v1 v2 V3 V3v1

V2 V3 V3V1

Auto Scaling Group

V3 V4

Elastic Load Balancing Elastic Load Balancing Elastic Load Balancing Elastic Load Balancing

DynamoDB

Write

Read Read Read ReadRead Read

WriteWrites

WriteWrite

Read

V3`

Elastic Load Balancing

Elastic Load Balancing

Elastic Load Balancing

Elastic Load Balancing

Elastic Load Balancing

Elastic Load Balancing

DynamoDB

Data Collection

Bidding

DynamoDB

Write

Read

Read

Write

Write

WriteAmazon S3

Amazon Kinesis

Data Collection

• Amazon EC2, Elastic Load Balancing, Auto Scaling

Store

• Amazon S3 + Amazon Kinesis

Global Distribution

• Apache Storm on Amazon EC2

Bid Store • DynamoDB

Bidding

• Amazon EC2, Elastic Load Balancing, Auto Scaling

Page 69: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일
Page 70: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일

Cloud-Ready Cloud-Aware Cloud-Native

• Run AWS like a virtual colocation

(Fork-lift)

• Does not optimize for on-demand (overprovisioned)

• Minor modifications to improve

cloud usage

• Automating servers can lower operational burden

• Redesign with AWS in mind

(high effort)

• Embrace scalable services (reduce admin)

• EC2, EBS

• HAProxy on EC2

• MySQL on EC2

• Cassandra, Hadoop on EC2

• ActiveMQ/Redis/KAFKA on EC2

• Chef on EC2

• EC2, EBS, S3, CloudFront

• ELB, Route53(round-robin)

• Multi-AZ RDS + read replica

• ElastiCache Redis

• OpsWorks

• Autoscaling, Self-healing

• Route53(LBR)

• RDS Aurora, RedShift

• DynamoDB, EMR

• SQS, SNS, Kinesis

• CloudFormation, Elastic Beanstalk

Development Cost Scalability/Availability Management Cost

Page 71: AWS re:Invent re:Cap - 비용 최적화 - 모범사례와 아키텍처 설계 심화편 - 이원일