b o n n e v i l l e p o w e r a d m i n i s t r a t i o n bpa - wisp project naspi work group...

Download B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N BPA - WISP Project NASPI Work Group Meeting October 12-13, 2011 Scott Lissit – Project Manager,

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: jean-garrison

Post on 08-Jan-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N ¨ Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE ¨ Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 3 Existing PMU Existing/Replace PMU, Group 1 Existing/Replace PMU, Group 2 Existing/Replace PMU, Group 3 New PMU, Group 1 New PMU, Group 2 New PMU, Group 3 New PMU, Group 4 BPA PMU Deployment

TRANSCRIPT

B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N BPA - WISP Project NASPI Work Group Meeting October 12-13, 2011 Scott Lissit Project Manager, Integration Lawrence Carter Project Manager, PMU Installation Nick Leitschuh Control Center Lead Dmitry Kosterev Transmission Planning B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 2 Project Overview Phase 1 - WISP Phase 2 Apr 2010 Apr 2013 Apr 2015 Apr 2011Apr PMU Installation ~132 PMUs 45 sites (32 500kV sites, kV sites) 10 wind sites (data only) -No DOE funding used. Matching SGIG grant goes to WECC -Control Center network design/install -Situational awareness applications (near- term) -SynchroPhasor RAS development Apr SP RAS deployment -Additional applications -Wind site integration B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 3 Existing PMU Existing/Replace PMU, Group 1 Existing/Replace PMU, Group 2 Existing/Replace PMU, Group 3 New PMU, Group 1 New PMU, Group 2 New PMU, Group 3 New PMU, Group 4 BPA PMU Deployment B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 4 PMUs SEL 487e chosen, with customized features: Multicast capability On-the-fly configuration for main/aux bus Two fully-configurable data streams from a single PMU (PDCs and RAS) Stand-alone units, deployed in pairs or quads IEEE C standard, M-class 60 samples per second Measurements: Voltage and line current phasors in polar format, bus frequency, calculated line MW and MVAR, PCB and MOD statuses No PDCs in substations B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 5 PMU Installation Redundant PMUs with redundant communication paths (to two control centers) Current Status: Standard designs complete 6 PMUs installed at 2 initial Beta sites Beta data being analyzed Contractor installation (Wilson/SAIC) Schedule Group 1 (Sites 3 14):February, 2012 Group 2 (Sites 15 26):June, 2012 Group 3 (Sites 27 40):October, 2012 Group 4 (Sites 41 45):March, 2013 Wind sites 1-10:December 2012 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 6 Communications Network BPA-operated telecom network SONET backbone Digital microwave with legacy analog microwave PMU network is IP over TDM using fractional T1s. UDP protocol. High-capacity routers chosen to enable migration to future applications (Ethernet devices) and evolution of PMU requirements RAS performance driving design (latency requirements) NERC CIP compliance driving design, network monitoring Telecom backup battery and charger replacement required at most sites B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 7 Control Centers Redundant PDCs in each control center Currently in testing, final selection not yet made Control Center Architecture Evaluating feasibility of in-house design based on OSI PI architecture and dedicated application server Data archives in each control center (short-term), and lab (long- term) Currently in testing, final selection not yet made Responsible for PMU network monitoring and NERC CIP compliance WISP WAN gateway Communications link between control centers B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 8 Network Architecture B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 9 Applications Strategy: Deploy WASA light and WECC shared view in Phase 1. Situational Awareness Phase angle alarm Event detection Oscillation Detection Mode Meter (Montana Tech) Engineering Applications Event analysis Dynamic performance baselining Model validation Other applications under development by BPA Technology Innovation: Robust state estimation and contingency analysis Wide area visualization B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 10 Model-Based Tools: Contingency Analysis State Estimation Measurement-based Tools: Dynamic reactive reserve monitor Phase angle monitor Synchro-phasors SCADA Trend Displays (PMU, SCADA) Wide-Area View: SCADA, PMU, Results of Contingency Analysis DATA ANALYTICAL APPLICATIONS PRESENTATION Measurement-Based Applications: Event Detection Oscillation Detection Mode Meter Dashboard Alarms BPA WASA Strategy B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 11 Simulated PMU data streams Wide Area Controls Test Controller Running Response Based Logic Testing System Digital Outputs Historical Data Raw Data User values Inject errors, delays, bad data, etc Developmental version of PMU-based Remedial Action Scheme (RAS) PHASE 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 12 Build on Existing Control Architecture 500-kV Line A-B Line Loss Logic 500-kV Line B-C Line Loss Logic Existing RAS Controller SWITCH Existing Local Controller Measured Local Voltage Set-Point Switching Sequence Response- Based Logic Controller Wide-Area Measurements PHASE 2 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 13 Challenges PMU Installation Short timeline Scheduling equipment outages Telecom Equipment selection impacted by RAS latency requirements, and bandwidth for future traffic Necessity for upgrades of back-up batteries and chargers at substations Cyber security PMUs will be CCAs, with associated PSP, ESP and operational requirements Selection/development of near-term situational awareness applications and environment (compatibility with legacy systems) Training for operations and maintenance of new equipment and network B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Acknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number(s) DE-OE Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. 14 Contact Information Scott Lissit, PM Lawrence Carter, PM (PMU Installation) Nick Leitschuh, PM (Control Center, SA Apps)