baart sarkar - wrpc · 2012-03-02 · baart sarkar government of india kond`iya ivavut p`aiqakrna...

Baart sarkar

Government of India kond`Iya ivaVut p`aiQakrNa

Central Electricity Authority

piScama xao~Iya ivaVut saimait WESTERN REGIONAL POWER COMMITTEE

p xao iva sa kI idnaaMk 10 frvarI 2012 kao navaI maumba[- maoM Aayaaoijat kI jaanaovaalaI 19 vaI baOzk kI kaya-vaR%t

MINUTES OF 19TH MEETING OF WRPC TO BE HELD ON 10TH FEBRUARY 2012 AT NEW MUMBAI

mauMba[- MUMBAI

C O N T E N T S

ITEM NO. PARTICULARS Page No.

ITEM No.1 CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 18th MEETING OF WRP COMMITTEE 1

ITEM No.2 EVACUATION OF POWER FROM KORBA STPS-III OF NTPC 1

ITEM No.3 SCHEDULING OF RGPPL POWER FOR 5% ALLOCATED CAPACITY TO DD, DNH AND GOA 2

ITEM No.4 APPLICATION OF POC LOSSES ON NSPCL-BSP/CSPDCL ENERGY TRANSACTIONS FOR POWER DRAWL FROM NSPCL STATION GENERATION BUS THROUGH INTRA-STATE DEDICATED LINES

3

ITEM No.5 CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (SHARING OF INTER-STATE TRANSMISSION CHARGES AND LOSSES) (FIRST AMENDMENT) REGULATION 2011 4

ITEM No.6 IDENTIFICATION OF NON-ISTS LINES CARRYING MORE THAN 50% INTER STATE POWER 11

ITEM No.7 DRAWAL OF POWER BY M/s ACB (INDIA) FOR START UP PURPOSE 14

ITEM No.8 BIFURCATION OF DECLARED CAPACITY ON KAWAS & GANDHAR 16

ITEM No.9 DECLARATION OF DC ON RLNG FOR RGPPL 19

ITEM No.10 LEVY OF STATE TRANSMISSION CHARGES FOR USAGE OF CHHATTISGARH STATE GRID 21

ITEM No.11 FIBRE OPTICS NETWORK IN WESTERN REGION 23

ITEM No.12 REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING SCADA SYSTEM INSTALLED AT SLDCs OF GUJARAT, MADHYA PRADESH AND CHHATTISGARH STATES OF WESTERN REGION. 24

ITEM No.13 WIDE AREA MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (WAMS) IN WR 25

ITEM No.14 RECONCILIATION OF UI AND REC ACCOUNTS 29

ITEM No.15 STATUS OF LC OPENING WRT BILL TOWARDS WRLDC FEES AND CHARGES. 30

ITEM No.16 PAYMENTS OF UI AND REACTIVE ENERGY CHARGES 31

ITEM No.17 DECLARATION OF GENERATING UNITS INTO COMMERCIAL OPERATION. 33

ITEM No.18 DECLARATION OF TRANSMISSION ELEMENTS INTO COMMERCIAL OPERATION BY PGCIL 33

ITEM No.19 RENOVATION AND MODERNISATION OF WRPC OFFICE BUILDING 35

ITEM No.20 GRANT OF LTOA/ MTOA /CONNECTIVITY FOR GENERATION DEVELOPERS BY POWERGRID. 35

ITEM No.21 ONGOING TRANSMISSION AND GENERATION SCHEMES IN WESTERN REGION 36

ITEM No.22 ONGOING GENERATION SCHEMES IN WESTERN REGION 39

ITEM No.23 PERFORMANCE OF WR GRID DURING SEPTEMBER 2011 TO DECEMBER 2011 40

ITEM No.24 ANTICIPATED POWER SUPPLY POSITION IN WESTERN REGION FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 2012 TO APRIL 2012 44

ITEM No.25 OTHER OPERATIONAL ITEMS 44

ITEM No.26 PROCEDURE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF MECHANISM OF RENEWABLE REGULATORY FUND 50

ITEM No.27 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROPOSALS DISCUSSED AND AGREED IN THE 33RD STANDING COMMITTEE MEETING ON POWER SYSTEM PLANNING FOR WESTERN REGION HELD ON 21.10.2011 AND AGENDA POINTS BY PGCIL

53

ITEM No.28 MEMBERSHIP OF WRPC 61

ITEM No.29 ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL POWER COMMITTEE 62

ITEM No.30 ANY OTHER ITEM 62

ITEM No.31 DATE AND VENUE OF NEXT WRPC MEETING 62

ANNEXURES

Annexure Particulars

Annexure-6 Approach paper of Study committee

Annexure-7.1 CSPDCL dated 07.12.2011

Annexure-7.2 CSPDCL letter No. 02-02/ACE-1/2021 Raipur dated 12.10.11

Annexure-8.1 & 8.2 NTPC letters dtd. 07.12.2011 and 8.12.2011

Annexure -9 MSEDCL Letter no CE/PP/WRPC/1496 dated 17.01.2012

Annexure- 10 CSPTCL letter No. 03-02/EERA/STU/Chrgs/WRLDC/2478 dated 14th December 2011

Annexure-11 Powergrid letter No C-LDC-WR-FO-Ltr dated 10.01.2012

Annexure-13 WAMS estimation by WRLDC.

Annexure-14 WRLDC letter No WRLDC/OS/15501/11 dated 14th Dec, 2011

Annexure- 18 PGCIL letter WR-II/VDR/COML/7515 dated 02.12.2011

Annexure-20 List of PGCIL granted MTOA

Annexure-21 Progress of ongoing transmission projects in Western Region

Annexure-22 Ongoing generation schemes in WR both under State as well as Central Sector

Annexure-23.1(a) Frequency profile during the period Sept 2011 to December 2011

Annexure-23.1 (b) Unrestricted peak demand, demand met and energy requirement and availability the period Sept 2011 to December 2011

Annexure-23.3 Month-wise details of UFR operation in Western Region during the period Sept 2011 to December 2011

Annexure-24 Anticipated power supply position in the region for the period from February 2011 to April 2011

Annexure-25.1.1(C)

WRLDC letter no WRLDC/OS/1517/12 dated 23.01.12, the REC pool status

Annexure-25.1.2.1 Voltage collapse prediction Relay Details

Annexure-29.1 CBR(Conduct of Business Rule) of NPC

Annexure-29.2 MPPTradco vide letter No. 05-01/86 dated 11.1.2012

Minutes of 19th WRPC meeting held at Navi Mumbai on 10.02.2012

MINUTES OF 19TH MEETING OF WESTERN REGIONAL POWER COMMITTEE HELD ON 10TH FEBRUARY 2012 AT NAVI MUMBAI

The Technical Co-ordination Committee and 19th Western Regional Power

Committee meetings were held on 09.02.2012 and 10.02.2012 respectively at Navi

Mumbai, hosted by Tata Power Company Limited. The list of participants is at

Annexure-1 (a) and Annexure -1 (b) respectively.

Shri Ashok Sethi, Chief, Mumbai Operation, TATA Power Co. Limited welcomed Shri

Ajoy Mehta, Chairman, WRPC/ CMD, MSEDCL, Shri Narendra Kumar,

Administrator, DD & DNH, Shri Arvind Singh, CMD, MSETCL, Shri K.K. Agarwal,

Member (GO&D), CEA, Shri G.S. Kalsi, Chairman, TCC and Managing Director,

CSPTCL, Member Secretary, WRPC, heads/senior representatives of NLDC,

WRLDC, SLDCs, WRLDC, CSPTCL, CSPDCL, CSPGCL, GETCO, GSECL,

DGVCL, GUVNL, MPPGCL, MP MKVVCL, MSETCL, MSEGCL, MSEDCL, MP

Tradeco, Goa Electricity Department, DD & DNH, NTPC, POWERGRID, NPCIL,

NCA, NHDC, Torrent Power, RGPPL, GIPCL, TPC, TPTCL, TPC(Distribution) and

participants in 19th meeting of WRPC hosted by TATA Power Co. Ltd. at Navi

Mumbai.

He said that TATA Power is glad to get the privilege to host the 19th WRPC meeting

at Navi Mumbai, and expressed hope that members shall be having comfortable stay

during their period of stay for the TCC and WRPC meetings here.

He stated that in power business TATA Power has distinction of integrated private

sector power utility in the country. TATA Power has Generating Capacity under

operation of 3014 MW of thermal, 447 MW of hydro, 333 MW of wind, & 3 MW of

solar. They also have the project under execution of total capacity 4729 MW

including 4525 MW thermal, 126 MW hydro, 43 MW wind & 35 MW solar power . In

transmission sector, Tata Power is amongst the 3 transmission licensees that bring

power into Mumbai.1,100 CKm of 220KV / 110KV lines and 17 receiving stations.

Joint venture between Tata Power (51%) and Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.

(49%) is the India’s first private sector inter-state transmission project, on a Build

Operate Own and Transfer (BOOT) basis, to evacuate power from the 1,020MW


Tala Hydro project in Bhutan and North Eastern and Eastern states to New Delhi and

adjoining areas which comprises of 1,166 Kms of 400 KV double circuit EMV

transmission line. In distribution sector TATA power is among 3 private distribution

licensees having Infrastructure of approximately 1,782 Kms of high tension and low

tension underground cable network, 99.33 kms overhead line network, 17 receiving

stations, 14 distribution sub-stations, 441 consumer sub-stations & Customer base of

over 275,000 retail customers. The joint venture between Tata Power (51%) and

Government of Delhi (49%) distribute power to North and North-west Delhi among

the 3 private licensees in Delhi 25,572 11 KV sub-stations, 58 grid stations, 4,265

Kms of HV cable and 5,687 Kms of LV cable over 1 million customers. He further

stated that Tata power is also associated with power trading, shipping subsidiaries

Strategic Electronics Division (SED) etc. Regarding environmental care Tata power

emphasized on growth through renewables, clean / green energy, uses efficient

technologies, investments in energy startups, emission and waste reduction, carbon

footprint reduction, green buildings, Bio-Diversity conservation, Resource

conservation water foot print.

Shri Ajoy Mehta, Chairman, WRPC/ CMD, MSEDCL welcomed members of WRPC-

heads and representatives of various agencies and power utilities of Western

Region, viz. CEA, CSPTCL, CSPDCL, CSPGCL, GETCO, GSECL, DGVCL,

MPPGCL, MP PKVVCL, MSETCL, MSEGCL, MSEDCL, Goa Electricity Department,

DD & DNH, NTPC, POWERGRID, NPCIL, NCA, NHDC, Torrent Power, APL,

RGPPL, GPECPL, TPC, TPTCL, TPC(Distribution), SLDCs, WRLDC, NLDC and

participants in 19th meeting of WRPC hosted by Tata Power at Navi Mumbai.

He stated that WRPC is a very important forum which suggests resolving various

issues on commercial, operational, grid security and planning matters for the

regional network and to find solution to the problems. He stated that we may resolve

issues amicably raised by various member utilities in this common regional important

forum and take decisions in the right in the light of right spirit of the regulations in

vogue and which shall be acceptable to all the concerned players based on mutual

understanding of problems, the logic, goodwill and group efforts. He emphasized

that the forum shall continue taking vigorous efforts and shall be able to devote more


time towards developing an efficient and economic system. This is our collective

responsibility and we should not miss the opportunity.

He thanked Ashok Sethi, Head(O & M) & other officers of Tata Power, for consenting

to host this meeting of WRPC and making excellent arrangements for the meeting

and for comfortable stay of the members attending the TCC and WRPC meetings.

Chairperson, WRPC thereafter requested Member Secretary, WRPC to take up the

agenda items for discussion.

ITEM No.1: CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE 18th MEETING OF WRP COMMITTEE

Member Secretary, WRPC stated that the minutes of 18th meeting of WRP

Committee held on 01.10.2011 at Ahmedabad were sent to the members vide letter

No. WRPC/18th WRPC Mtg./AS/2011/10266 dated 15.11.2011. No comment on the

minutes has been received. The minutes may be confirmed.

The minutes of 18th WRP Committee were confirmed. ITEM NO. 2: SCHEDULING OF KORBA STPS-III POWER OF NTPC. Member Secretary, WRPC stated that in 18th WRPC meeting held on 1.10.2011 it

was decided that WRLDC would refund charges collected by WRLDC from all the

constituents on account of short term scheduling of power from Korba-III and would

furnish necessary data to WRPC Secretariat to revise the energy and UI accounts

and suggested that accounting details may be finalized based on data to be

furnished by WRLDC in line with the above mentioned CERC order dated 6.9.2011. In 60th CCM of WRPC held on 23.12.2011, WRLDC had intimated that the

calculations were ready with them and in consultation with the NLDC would decide

about how the adjustments of LTA bills against the STOA will be done. The data for

revision of UIs and REAs would be provided by 15th January, 2012. GM, WRLDC

and PGCIL representative further stated that a petition has been filed with Hon’ble

Appellate Tribunal.


The Commercial Committee members in the above meeting had expressed that

since no stay on Hon’ble CERC order has been sought, the CERC directives be

acted upon so that the dues were settled.

It was observed that in order to implement the above order of Hon’ble Commission,

WRLDC was to refund charges collected from all the constituents on account of

short term scheduling of power from Korba-III and would furnish necessary data to

WRPC Secretariat to revise the energy and UI accounts intimated by them in the 60th

CCM as above.

GM, WRLDC had intimated that amount collected for STOA was disbursed by them

to beneficiaries which were scheduled short-term power from Korba-3 station and

balance amount would be adjusted by WRLDC with the beneficiaries. He said that

the amount available with PGCIL relating to transmission charges is to be adjusted

by them. WRLDC further intimated that the necessary data has been furnished to

WRPC on 8th February, 2012 and WRPC would be revising the REA and UI

accounts shortly.

WR Power Committee noted as above. ITEM No.3: SCHEDULING OF RGPPL POWER FOR 5% ALLOCATED

CAPACITY TO DD, DNH AND GOA

In 18th WRPC meeting held on 1.10.2011 the matter for scheduling 5% power to

Goa, DD and DNH from RGPPL and status on signing of agreement with MSETCL

for use of MSETCL network & the opening of the LC with MSETCL and RGPPL was

discussed. It was noted by the Committee that DD and DNH had completed the

necessary formalities whereas for Goa the process had not completed. After

deliberations the Committee had agreed that till such time Goa fulfills the conditions

for allocation, the 1% Goa power of RGGPL may be redistributed among

beneficiaries of RGPPL in proportion to their shares from RGGPL during the interim

period and requested WRPC Secretariat to issue for the interim period, a re-

distributed allocation for 1% portion of the Goa power from RGPPL station pro-rata

to RGPPL shares for Maharashtra, DD and DNH so that scheduling of RGPPL


power to its beneficiaries by the WRLDC commences immediately w.e.f 3.10.2011.

RGPPL representative agreed to commence the day-ahead formalities for

scheduling of the power w.e.f. 2.10.2011. Scheduling of power from RGPPL had

then commenced w.e.f 3.10.2011 as agreed above.

In 60th Commercial Committee meeting of WRPC held on 23.12.2011 the status on

scheduling of RGPPL power to Goa was discussed. The Committee had noted about

the intimation given by Chief Electrical Engineer, Govt of Goa vide letter no

101/01/CEE/Tech/255 dated 14-12-2011 that PPA with RGPPL was executed on 29-

04-11 and BPTA with MSETCL was executed on 21-11-2011 and that Electricity

department was in the process of opening of the LCs favouring RGPPL and MSETCL

respectively for which matter was taken up with State Bank of India. Goa Electricity

Department had requested RGPPL and MSETCL to look into whether scheduling the

share power for Goa could commence. During the meeting upon request by Goa

representative to MSETCL and RGPPL to commence scheduling their share pending

opening of LCs, RGPPL and MSEDCL representatives expressed that scheduling

could be commenced on opening of the LCs.

In the TCC/WRPC meeting, Goa Electricity Department intimated that they were in

the process of opening the LC with RGPPL and would be able to complete the

formality by mid-March 2012 and requested RGPPL to schedule power from 1st

March 2012 pending opening of LC as above.

MSEDCL agreed to the Goa’s request. However RGPPL requested Goa to provide

them a letter regarding their above request and they would take up with their

management for clearance.

WRLDC requested that upon receiving confirmation from the concerned utilities for

commencing the scheduling of power to Goa, WRPC Sectt. shall intimate entitlement

details to WRLDC to facilitate scheduling of RGGPL power to its beneficiaries

commencing 1% portion of the RGPPL power allocated to Goa.

WR Power Committee agreed to the above.


ITEM No. 4: APPLICATION OF POC LOSSES ON NSPCL-BSP/CSPDCL ENERGY TRANSACTIONS FOR POWER DRAWL FROM NSPCL STATION GENERATION BUS THROUGH INTRA-STATE DEDICATED LINES.

4.4 The matter of application of losses on transactions scheduled for CSPDCL and BSP

from NSPCL station subsequent to shifting of control area of NSPCL from SLDC, CSPTCL

to WRLDC was discussed in the 59th Commercial Committee Meeting wherein most

of the members of the Commercial Committee had expressed that PoC losses

should not be applied on both BSP/CSPDCL as CSPDCL and BSP have not availed

any LTA/MTOA from CTU for drawl of NSPCL power and have direct connectivity

with NSCPL bus through intrastate network of Chhattisgarh system as such CTU

transmission network is not used for drawal of their power from the station. Hence,

PoC losses should be applicable for allocated power by the entities using ISTS

network through Open Access for this network.

4.5 The matter was deliberated in detail and the Commercial Committee had

suggested that in view of the above discussions and the request submitted by BSP,

the opinion of NLDC may again be sought by WRPC on the subject matter of

application of PoC losses on NSPCL-BSP/CSPDCL energy transactions.

4.6 Accordingly, WRPC vide letter WRPC/Comml-I/POC/2011/1366 dated

26.8.2011 addressed to GM, NLDC requested to examine the matter.

4.7 In the 18th WRPC meeting, while discussing on above, WRLDC had intimated

that NLDC had sought the opinion of CERC in the matter.

During TCC meeting, WRLDC intimated that the opinion of CERC in the matter is

awaited further BSP had filed petition with Hon’ble CERC in this regard and the

hearing was scheduled for 23.2.2012.

WRP Committee noted as above.


ITEM No. 5: CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (SHARING OF

INTER-STATE TRANSMISSION CHARGES AND LOSSES) (FIRST AMENDMENT) REGULATION 2011.

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission vide No.L-1/44/2010-CERC dated the 24th

November, 2011 have issued first amendment to Central Electricity Regulatory

Commission (Sharing of Inter State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations,

2010 issued vide No.L-1/44/2010-CERC Dated: 15th June 2010 (referred to as “the

Principal Regulations”), and these regulations are referred to as Central Electricity

Regulatory Commission (Sharing of inter-State Transmission Charges and Losses)

(First Amendment) Regulations, 2011. The amendments are as follows:-

I. Amendment of Regulation 2 of Principal Regulations: (1) Sub-clause (c) of clause (1) of Regulation 2 of the Principal Regulations

regarding ‘Approved Injection’ definition.

(2) Sub-clause (f) of clause (1) of Regulation 2 of the Principal Regulations regarding

‘Approved Withdrawl’ definition

(3) Under sub-clause (l) of clause (1) Regulation 2 of the Principal Regulations-

inclusion of clause regarding billing of ISTS charges.

(4) Inclusion of clause (ti) for definition of 'target region' after sub-clause (t) of

Regulation 2 of the Principal Regulations

(5) Sub-clause (y) of clause (1) of Regulation 2 of the Principal Regulations –

substitution of modified clause for definition of Yearly Transmission Charges (YTC).

II. Amendment of Regulation 3 of Principal Regulations: Amendment to Clause (b) of Regulation 3 of the Principal Regulations

III. Amendment of Regulation 7 of Principal Regulations regarding process to determine POC transmission charges and losses allocations. 1) Sub-clause (l) of clause (1) of Regulation 7 of the Principal Regulations –

regarding YTC charges’ revisions and the periodicity etc. as follows:-

“(l) Overall charges to be shared among the nodes shall be computed based on the

Yearly Transmission Charges apportioned to each of the lines of the ISTS

Licensees. The Yearly Transmission Charges, computed for the assets for each

voltage level and conductor configuration shall be provided by the respective ISTS

transmission licensees. The ISTS Licensees, deemed ISTS Licensees and owners


of the non-ISTS Lines certified by the Regional Power Committees shall give the

total Yearly Transmission Charges of their transmission assets, whose charges are

to be recovered through the PoC mechanism in the application period along with

circuit kilometers at each voltage level and for each conductor configuration. The

total Yearly Transmission Charges shall be apportioned for each voltage level and

conductor configuration based on the ratio of the indicative cost levels furnished by

CTU at the beginning of each year or application period and approved by the

Commission:

Provided that the YTC shall be revised on a six monthly basis i.e. on 1st April and 1st

October in the first full year and subsequently on quarterly basis, i.e. on 1st April,1st

July, 1st October and 1st December. "

(2) deletion of Sub-clause (m) of clause (1) of Regulation 7 of the Principal

Regulations

(3) Addition under Sub-clause (o) of clause (1) of Regulation 7 of the Principal

Regulations regarding considering single scenario based on average generation and

demand data published by the Central Electricity Authority for determination of POC

charges for the year 2011-12 or for such further period as the Hon’ble Commission

decides based on the availability of node-wise forecast data for different scenarios

from the DICs.

IV. Amendment to Regulation 11 of Principal Regulations regarding billing- (1) Substitution of the para below the computation formulae in clause (4) of

Regulation 11 of the Principal Regulations as follows:

“This first part of the bill shall be raised based on the Point of Connection charges,

Approved Withdrawal and Approved Injection for each Designated ISTS Customer,

provided by the Implementing Agency on the next working day of uploading of the

Regional Transmission Accounts by the respective Regional Power Committees on

their websites in each month for the previous month and determined prior to the

commencement of the application period:


Provided that the list of transmission assets along with the approved transmission

charges for which billing has been done shall be enclosed with the first part of the

bill:

Provided further that the charges for the quantum of long term access to a target

region without identified beneficiaries shall comprise the Injection POC charges and

lowest of the Demand POC charges among all the DICs in the target region.”

(2) Substitution of the para below the computation formulae in clause (5) of

Regulation 11 of the Principal Regulations as follows:

“The second part of the bill shall be raised on the designated ISTS Customers

alongwith the first part of the bill:

Provided that the revenue collected from the approved additional Medium-term Open

Access customers in the synchronously connected grid, which has not been

considered in the Approved Injection/Approved Withdrawal, shall be reimbursed to

the DICs located in the same synchronously connected grid having Long-term

Access in the following month, in proportion to the monthly billing of the respective

month:

Provided further that the Injection POC charges and Demand POC charges for

Medium-term Open Access to the target region for which Long-term Access has

been granted to the generator shall be adjusted against Injection POC charges and

Demand POC charges for the Long-term Access to the target region without

identified beneficiaries and not against Long-term Access granted to any other target

region without identified beneficiaries:

Provided also that the injection POC charge for Medium-term open access given to a

generator to any region shall be offset against the injection POC charge for LTA

granted to the generator to the target region:

Provided also that a generator who has been granted Long-term Access to a target

region without identified beneficiaries, shall be required to pay PoC injection charge

plus the lowest of the PoC demand charge among all the DICs in the target region


for the remaining quantum after offsetting the quantum of Medium-term Open

Access subject to the last proviso of clause (4) of Regulation 11:

Provided also that this adjustment shall not be allowed for collective transactions and

bilateral transactions carried out by the trading licensees who have a portfolio of

generators in a State for which LTA was obtained to a target region.”

(3) Substitution of the last para under Clause (7) of Regulation 11 of the Principal

Regulations as follows:

“This bill shall be raised by the CTU within 3 (three) working days of the issuance of

the Regional Transmission Deviation Account by the RPCs:

Provided that the agency of the State responsible for the intimation of deviation on

account of Unscheduled Interchange energy shall be the agency responsible for the

intimation of deviation on account of the transmission usage to the respective RPCs,

for inclusion of the same in their Regional Transmission Deviation Account (RTDA):

Provided further that the revenue collected against the Bill for Deviation from DICs in

the synchronously connected grid shall be reimbursed to the DICs in the same

synchronously connected grid having Long-term Access, in the following month, in

proportion to the monthly billing of the respective month."

(4) Deletion of Clause (8) of Regulation 11 of the Principal Regulations

(5) Addition to Clause (9) of Regulation 11 of the Principal Regulations

“Provided that the Injection POC charges and Demand POC charges for Short-term

Open Access to the target region for which Long-term Access has been granted to

the generator, shall be adjusted against the Injection POC charges and Demand

POC charges for the Long-term Access to the target region without identified

beneficiaries and not against Long-term Access to any other target region without

identified beneficiaries:

Provided further that the injection POC charge for Short-term open access given to a

generator to any region shall be offset against the injection POC charge for LTA

granted to the generator to the target region:


Provided also that a generator who has been granted Long-term Access to a target

region without identified beneficiaries, shall be required to pay PoC injection charge

plus the lowest of the PoC demand charge among all the DICs in the target region

for the remaining quantum after offsetting the quantum of Medium-term Open

Access and Short-term open access:

Provided also that this adjustment shall not be allowed for collective transactions and

bilateral transactions carried out by the trading licensees who have a portfolio of

generators in a State for which LTA was obtained to a target region.”

V. Amendment to the Annexure of the principal regulations

(1) Last sub-para under Para 2.1.2 (g) of the Annexure of the Principal Regulations

under the head “Network Data” substituted as under:

“(g) Overall charges to be allocated among nodes shall be computed by adopting the

YTC of transmission assets of the ISTS licensees, deemed ISTS licensees and

owners of the non-ISTS lines which have been certified by the respective Regional

Power Committees (RPC) for carrying inter-State power. The Yearly Transmission

Charge, computed for assets at each voltage level and conductor configuration in

accordance with the provisions of these regulations shall be calculated for each ISTS

transmission licensee based on indicative cost level provided by the Central

Transmission Utility for different voltage levels and conductor configuration. The YTC

for the RPC certified non-ISTS lines which carry inter-State power shall be approved

by the Appropriate Commission.

In case the tariff for the RPC certified non-ISTS lines have not been specified by the

Appropriate Commission, the average YTC as computed for the relevant voltage

level and conductor configuration shall be used.

The non-ISTS lines certified by the RPCs as on 15.06.2010 shall continue to be

treated as RPC certified non-ISTS lines carrying inter-State power. The YTC of such

RPC certified non-ISTS lines shall remain the same and be governed by the same

principle as it existed as on 15.6.2010.


For certifying non-ISTS lines for carrying inter-State power, which were not approved

by the RPCs on the date of notification of the Principal Regulations, this shall be

determined through the process of load flow studies. The results of the load flow

studies, on an annual average basis, should show these lines carrying more than

50% of the total power carried by it to be inter-State power. This shall be vetted by

the NLDC in consultation with the respective RLDC on the proposal made by the

respective RPC, through a common methodology to be adopted by the NLDC. The

YTC for such RPC certified non-ISTS lines which carry inter-State power, shall be

approved by the Appropriate Commission.

The recovery of the YTC of the transmission assets expected to be commissioned in

the Application Period shall be incorporated by the Implementing Agency on the

basis of the approved tariff including provisionally approved tariff:

Provided that the disbursement to the owners of new RPC certified non-ISTS lines

shall be done after the tariff is approved by the Appropriate Commission.”

(2) The following is added after the first paragraph in Step 4 of clause (2) under Para

2.7 of Annexure of the Principal Regulations:

“The charges of the HVDC back to back inter-regional links at Chandrapur and

Gazuwaka shall be included in the YTC of the NEW grid and the SR grid in the ratio

of 1:1 and charges for Talcher–Kolar HVDC bi-pole link shall be shared by DICs of

SR only.”

During 60th CCM, the Committee while noting the amendments referred to “ …on

WBSEDCL suggestion that Implementing Agency/ Validation Committee has

increased the approved capacity by 5% for Thermal Generation and 10% for Hydro

Generation which is not in accordance with the Regulations and it should consider

the ex-bus capacity only. Commission is of the view that all thermal generating units

are allowed to inject upto 105% of the Maximum Continuous Rating (MCR) and all

hydro generating units are allowed to inject upto 110% of the MCR, as provided in

the Central Electricity Authority (Technical Standards for Connectivity to the Grid)


Regulations, 2007, which are to be complied with as provided in the CERC

Connectivity Regulations, 2009. It is observed that the definition only defines the

quantum of power the DIC proposes to inject. It has nothing to do with the margins

available with the generating units. Hence, there is no need for this provision in the

definition of ‘Approved Injection’. This provision, however, is not clearly mentioned in

the regulations. The 105% for thermal generating stations and 110% for hydro

generating stations is the overload capability and is not expected to be in continuous

operation at this capacity. However, this suggestion will be considered at the time of

future amendment to the Sharing Regulations.” of SOR of amendments of Sharing

Regulations and the Commercial Committee in the above meeting expressed that

approved injection of ISGS generations, be computed without taking into

consideration the overloading capacities of 5% & 10% of thermal generator and

Hydro generators respectively and had suggested that NLDC should furnish the data

of approved injection based on above.

Further the Commercial Committee noted that there exists LTA to Lanco Kondapalli

PPL (located in Southern Region) for total quantum of 350 MW to NR and WR out of

which LTA for 200 MW is granted to the said plant for Western Region, the

beneficiaries against which are not identified. The same therefore requires to be

incorporated in the REAs of WRPC from the date of effect of grant of LTA and

necessary revisions in the REA be made for the period prior to POC regime. Further

in RTA in view of inclusion of provision i.e. “Provided further that the charges for the

quantum of long term access to a target region without identified beneficiaries shall

comprise the Injection POC charges and lowest of the Demand POC charges among

all the DICs in the target region”, Demand POC charges of Western Region for

Lanco Kondapalli may therefore be included in RTA of WRPC.

In view of above amendments to regulation, Committee recommended to incorporate

following in the Transmission and Energy accounts:

• Demand POC charges of Lanco Kondapalli would be included in RTA.

• PGCIL would communicate the date of effect of grant of LTA to Lanco

Kondapalli, according to which REAs would be revised incorporating inclusion


of Lanco Kondapalli for the period prior to implementation of new

Transmission charge Regulations, 2010 (i.e. 1.7.2011).

• NLDC should compute the approved injection of ISGS generations without

taking into consideration the overloading capacities of 5% & 10% of thermal

generator and Hydro generators respectively.

During the TCC meeting it was intimated that the above will be implemented from the

date of Gazette notification as per the first amendment order to Central Electricity

Regulatory Commission (Sharing of Inter State Transmission Charges and Losses)

Regulations.

ED (Comml), PGCIL intimated that that Gazette notification is issued on 25.11.11.

He would forward the copy of the same and TCC had recommended that in such a

case the accounts may be prepared accordingly.

Further it was intimated that the matter of approved injection of ISGS generations

without taking into consideration the overloading capacities of 5% & 10% of thermal

generator and Hydro generators respectively would be taken up in the 2nd Validation

Committee of PoC.

During WRP Committee meeting, MS WRPC stated that in line with the amendment

orders of Hon’ble CERC issued, the RTA and RTDA would be revised from the date

of effect of above amendment.

MSEDCL intimated that they had filed a petition in the Hon’ble High Court on the

principle regulations concerning transmission charge sharing.

MPPTCL stated that approved injection of ISGS generations should be taken without

taking into consideration of the overloading capacities of 5% & 10% of thermal

generator and Hydro generators respectively.

MS WRPC stated that as per the CERC Regulation, approved injection of ISGS

generation is to be provided by NLDC which is accordingly being taken for

preparation of accounts. During the validation Committee the matter was discussed


wherein Chief (Engg.) CERC had clarified on above and intimated that any ambiguity

in regard to above shall be removed in the draft amendments.

Chairman WRPC suggested that the RPC as a technical body is to implement the

regulations, the regional constituents may have different views about regulations and

as the interpretation on the matters related to these is within the purview of

regulatory bodies any party having different opinion might approach the concerned

authority for seeking necessary clarifications on the same.

WRP Committee therefore noted that, though some of the constituents may have different opinion about the system, however as the regulation exists and there is no stay the same may be followed.

ITEM No. 6: IDENTIFICATION OF NON-ISTS LINES CARRYING MORE THAN 50% INTER STATE POWER:

Background: In the 18th WRPC meeting held on 01.10.2011, wherein it was

suggested that inclusion of new non-ISTS lines shall be identified as per CERC

guidelines dated 4.4.2011 by WR Study Committee based on data already available

with NLDC. Committee suggested that as per above the Study group comprising

representatives from Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, WRLDC

and WRPC and also if required IIT-B, Mumbai may carry out detailed study for

identification of lines carrying more than 50% ISTS power for inclusion in POC.

GUVNL had requested completion of studies and recommendation of lines to be put

up in first review of PoC.

It is intimated that as per Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Sharing of inter-

State Transmission Charges and Losses) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2011,

vide clause 2.1.2 (g) of Annexure of Principal Regulations as below,

QUOTE

For certifying non-ISTS lines for carrying inter-State power, which were not approved

by the RPCs on the date of notification of the Principal Regulations, this shall be

determined through the process of load flow studies. The results of the load flow

studies, on an annual average basis, should show these lines carrying more than


50% of the total power carried by it to be inter-State power. This shall be vetted by

the NLDC in consultation with the respective RLDC on the proposal made by the

respective RPC, through a common methodology to be adopted by the NLDC. The

YTC for such RPC certified non-ISTS lines which carry inter-State power shall be

approved by the Appropriate Commission.

UNQUOTE

In 60th CCM held on 23.12.2011, the matter to identify non ISTS lines carrying more

than 50% of the ISGS power was discussed in the light of above. It was suggested

that in order to there is a need to discuss and agree on the methodology to be

adopted and carry out the exercise accordingly. The following are some possible

approaches which may be adopted for determination of these non ISTS lines:

1) Average Participation method : Proportionate Power tracing through this

methodology has already been discussed in the “Statement of Reasons” on

transmission pricing and losses 2010, Dtd 11.06.2010, under section 3.1, to a

question “rationale for using the Marginal Participation Method, when PoC

transmission charges could be computed by directly using the Average

Participation Method which is being used in the Hybrid Method for selection of

slack buses”, where in the disadvantages of this method has been elaborated.

2) Use of with & without approach: In this method each of the non ISTS

elements would be removed, load flow study would be carried out and the

change in flow in the ISTS lines would be determined. If the change in power

flow on the ISTS lines is more than 50% of the flow on the non ISTS element

in the base case LF studies, then this element would be considered for

deemed ISTS element. The exercise is repeated for all the non ISTS

elements.

3) Hybrid Methodology. The 3rd method is adopted for determination of sharing

of the ISTS transmission charges by the beneficiaries (POC). Since this is the

CERC approved method, the output of the matrix obtained by hybrid

methodology may be used for identifying the usage of non-ISTS lines for inter-


state power; thereby the same principles adopted for computation of PoC

charges would be utilized. Hence there would not be any deviation from the

working principle which has already been adopted for ISTS network.

4) Identifying on the basis of displacement of power: An alternate approach

based on total quantum of ISGS Power entering and leaving the state

peripheries and division of the same amongst the State networks and CTU

network may form the basis to identify the above non ISTS lines and is under

formulation.

The Commercial Committee of WRPC in 60th CCM suggested that the above

proposed approaches may be discussed in the Study Committee meeting to be held

in the second week of January 2012. In addition to the Study Committee members,

the representatives from Commercial Committee of WRPC may also participate in

the discussion of the methodology as discussed in the 18th WRPC meeting, therefore

the Study would also include additional representatives from Gujarat, Madhya

Pradesh, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, WRLDC and WRPC to recommend inclusion of

such non-ISTS lines as directed by Hon’ble Commission. The Committee may

nominate representative from each State for the above purpose. The Constituent

utilities may also like to suggest for adopting any of the above approaches to identify

the non-ISTS lines carrying more than 50% of the total power carried by these to be

the inter-State power for inclusion under POC computations. Committee had

suggested to elaborate in detail on the approaches proposed above so as to

facilitate taking decision on identification process by the Study Committee and other

representatives from WR stated above.

Committee suggested that IIT-B may also be involved in the study and also uniform

method should be adopted by all RPCs.

Subsequently a meeting was held on 13.1.2012 as proposed above and the

participants went through details for each of the above approaches.

The study committee members had noted that the State owned inter-state lines for

which YTC approved by the Appropriate State Commissions of the States owning


such lines or portions of such lines is furnished could be considered by the

implementing agency for inclusion under POC charge sharing.

The Study Committee had further noted that rest of the RPCs were also in the

process of choosing suitable approach to identify the non-ISTS lines on more than

50% ISTS power flow basis. All RPCs are of the view point for adopting a common

methodology to arrive at the results on common basis. The study Committee

suggested that an approach paper be prepared based on the above discussions.

Subsequently the approach paper was prepared (copy at Annexure 6) and made

available to above group members. A meeting between the RPCs was also held on

17.1.2012 at ERPC office, Kolkata to discuss on evolving common methodology for

identification of the necessary non-ISTS lines. The contents of the above approach

paper were also discussed in the above meeting. The response on above shall be

intimated.

TCC Discussion: SE (Opn), WRPC informed that during the discussions on the

Approach Paper Methodologies held with ERPC on 17.1.2012 , it appeared that

many of the issues raised by ER Constituents pertaining to Intra-State Power (ISP)

may get addressed if Power Displacement Method is adopted. Further the method

may be modified to include the power transactions on Net basis. This however shall

requires to be accepted by the Hon’ble CERC. ERPC had suggested that results on

the basis above method may be worked out forming a part of draft approach paper to

visualize the feasibility to fit into the common approach.

The TCC during discussions suggested that WRPC may prepare a draft approach

paper which will indicate the non-ISTS lines through the load flow study using at

least two approaches which may be circulated to the constituents for perusal and

comments.



ITEM No. 7: DRAWAL OF POWER BY M/s ACB (INDIA) FOR START UP PURPOSE

CSPDCL vide letter dated 07.12.2011 (copy enclosed at Annexure-7.1) have

intimated that, M/s ACB (India) Ltd. an IPP situated at Kasaipali, Korba,

Chhattisgarh State, was granted connectivity by CTU with ISTS grid through LILO of

400kV Korba-Bhatapara single circuit. The commissioning work of units at M/s ACB

(I) Ltd. was under progress and it was drawing power from the grid. The same was

reflected in the UI account of WRPC. CSPDCL indicated that for availing start up

power purpose, ACB had not approached them. Further, it has been intimated that

there are more than 20 IPPs which are commissioning their power plants in

Chhattisgarh, if they adopt this process, CSPDCL would lose these consumers.

CSPDCL vide their letter No. 02-02/ACE-1/2021 Raipur dated 12.10.11(copy

enclosed at Annexure-7.2) had taken up above matter with PGCIL. PGCIL vide

letter no. C/SEF/W/06/ACB dated 15th Nov., 2011 (copy enclosed at Annexure-7.3)

had informed that M/s ACB (I) Ltd were granted LTA for transfer of power from their

2x135 MW generation project at Kasaipali, Chhattisgarh through interconnection at

WR pooling station (Bilaspur). As an interim arrangement for interconnection /LTA of

the generation project was granted by CTU in consultation with CEA and all WR

constituents through LILO of 400 kV Korba-Bhatapara s/c line at ACB TPS. PGCIL

indicated that as per the CERC (Grant of Connectivity, Long-term Access and

Medium-term Open Access in Inter-State Transmission and related matters)

Regulations, 2009, M/s ACB (I) Ltd., may draw start up power from Central Grid after

obtaining permission from WRLDC.

Since the drawl of M/s ACB was from the CTU network, and no schedule was

issued, the energy drawn by M/s ACB was accounted in the UI, accordingly it is

reflected in the UI Account of WRPC.

In the above context, CSPDCL intimated that as the State Commission has devised

a separate tariff category for start-up power for any generating station, under this

category the Start-up power can also be utilised for initial commissioning of a

generator and its auxiliaries.


During 60th CCM, GM WRLDC clarified that on grant of connectivity by PGCIL, M/s

ACB was allowed to draw power for commissioning of the plant in line with the

CERC approved connectivity agreement clause 6.2. , 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 as below:

Quote

6.2. The Applicant shall ensure that its unscheduled interchange with the grid is

limited to inadvertent changes only and does not cause any transmission constraint.

In case of repeated instances of unscheduled interchange with grid leading to

transmission constraints or grid violations and continued violation of instruction of

SLDC/RLDC to reduce such interchange, would entail cancellation of connectivity.

The concerned SLDC/RLDC may report such matter to respective Commission.

6.3. However, generating station, including captive generating plant, which has been

granted connectivity to the grid shall be allowed to undertake testing including full

load testing by injecting its infirm power into the grid before being put into

commercial operation, even before availing any type of open access, after obtaining

permission of the concerned Regional Load Dispatch Centre, which shall keep grid

security in view while granting such permission. This infirm power from a generating

station or a unit thereof, other than those based on non-conventional energy

sources, the tariff of which is determined by the Commission, will be governed by the

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff)

Regulations. The power injected into the grid from other generating stations as a

result of this testing shall also be charged at UI rates.

6.4. The Generating Station including Captive Generating Station will submit likely

date of synchronization, likely quantum and period of injection of infirm power to the

SLDC and RLDC concerned at least one month in advance. If the Generating Station

or CPP is considered as a Regional Entity as per clause 6.4.1 of IEGC, UI charges

for such infirm power would be paid from the Regional UI Pool. However, in case of

intra-State entity, the UI payment shall be settled with the State UI Pool in

accordance with Regulation 30.” Unquote


In view of above, it was noted by CSPDL that drawl of power for commissioning of

the plant in case of above is line with the CERC approved connectivity agreement.

WRP Committee noted as above. ITEM No. 8: BIFURCATION OF DECLARED CAPACITY ON KAWAS &

GANDHAR

NTPC vide their letters dtd. 07.12.2011 and 8.12.2011 (copies at Annexure-9.1 & 9.2) have intimated that the NTPC gas stations in WR have been allocated around

0.82 MCMD additional domestic gas (non-APM) to be supplied by GAIL from

nominated fields of ONGC. NTPC have intimated that it has decided to utilise this

gas for Kawas and Gandhar GPSs in WR. The non-APM rates as approved by Govt.

and other charges as applicable shall be payable by the customers. The terms and

conditions for supply of gas signed with GAIL inter alia include Take or Pay Charges.

NTPC have further intimated that since the variable cost of this APM gas is

significantly higher (@Rs3.68) as compared to existing gas (APM+PMT+CGF) (@

Rs 2.08), these two types of fuel are to be declared and scheduled separately in line

with CERC orders in the past (dated 23.2.2004 in petition 80/2003 and dated

6.2.2007 in petition No. 148/2005). NTPC had requested WRLDC for declaration of

DC & scheduling of these two fuel types separately. NTPC have intimated that they

have sought the consent of beneficiaries of Kawas and Gandhar stations for availing

generation on non-APM gas.

The above matter was earlier discussed in the 430th OCCM of WRPC held on

14.12.2011. The constituents were agreeable for scheduling the power on different

type of fuels. However the consent for ‘take or pay’ could not be confirmed by all the

beneficiaries.

During 60th Commercial Committee Meeting of WRPC held on 23.12.2011, it was

expressed by the Committee that scheduling is to be done in line with provisions

contained in IEGC on scheduling and despatch code. Decisions of Hon’ble

Commission in Petition No.95/2005 in the matter of direction to NTPC to tie up and

procure adequate quantum of gas at economical rates for Kawas and Gandhar

Power Stations and give consent to Gujarat State Petronet Ltd. for laying pipeline in


the premises of Kawas and Gandhar Power Stations for supply of gas from Gujarat

State Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and in Petition No.80/2003 in the matter of Giving

direction to NTPC for billing of variable costs for power drawn by GEB from Kawas

Gas Power Station (KGPS) of NTPC on Gas and Naphtha separately on the basis of

energy scheduled from KGPS commensurate with requisition related to specific fuel

(generation) usage may work as guide lines. The provisions under clause 6.4.9,

6.4.16 and 6.4.19 of IEGC Regulations, 2010 are as below:

Quote

“6.4.9 The ISGS, other generating stations and sellers shall be responsible for

power generation/power injection generally according to the daily schedules advised

to them by the RLDC/SLDC on the basis of the contracts/ requisitions received from

the SLDCs/buyers/Power Exchanges.

6.4.16 The ISGS shall make an advance declaration of ex-power plant MW and

MWh capabilities foreseen for the next day, i.e., from 0000 hrs to 2400 hrs. During

fuel shortage condition, in case of thermal stations, they may specify minimum MW,

maximum MW, MWh capability and declaration of fuel shortage. The generating

stations shall also declare the possible ramping up / ramping down in a block. In

case of a gas turbine generating station or a combined cycle generating station, the

generating station shall declare the capacity for units and modules on APM gas,

RLNG and liquid fuel separately, and these shall be scheduled separately.

6.4.18 It shall be incumbent upon the ISGS to declare the plant capabilities

faithfully, i.e., according to their best assessment. In case, it is suspected that they

have deliberately over/under declared the plant capability contemplating to deviate

from the schedules given on the basis of their capability declarations (and thus make

money either as undue capacity charge or as the charge for deviations from

schedule), the RLDC may ask the ISGS to explain the situation with necessary

backup data. ”

Unquote


In the 60th CCM of WRPC, as mentioned above, NTPC had sought the consent of

beneficiaries of Kawas and Gandhar stations for availing generation on non APM

gas. NTPC had intimated that all the beneficiaries except GUVNL had given their

consent to avail generation on non APM gas. NTPC had therefore vide their letter

dated 17.12.2011 and in the 60th CCM requested POSOCO, WRLDC to make

necessary arrangement for separate scheduling of generation from 0.82 MMSCMD

of non-APM gas to various beneficiaries according to the methodology proposed by

NTPC therein.

GM WRLDC stated that, there is no clarity in the proposal made by NTPC for

adjustment of non-APM gas power. Scheduling cannot be done as per the proposal

of NTPC, if constituents do not agree to this arrangement. Gujarat entitlements from

Gandhar & Kawas not availed by Gujarat shall therefore be treated as URS power.

The Commercial Committee discussed the issue. GUVNL representative had stated

that they did not have objection to scheduling the power separately on APM and non

APM gas and agreed to pay the fixed cost as per their entitlements in total DC on

APM gas, non-APM gas, RLNG and Naphtha fuels. Therefore, their entitlements

from Gandhar & Kawas be declared by WRLDC to Gujarat as per the same and in

case these entitlements are not availed by Gujarat, the same may be treated as URS

power. GUVNL however had not agreed to the condition for “take or pay” clause in

case of non-requisitioning of non-APM gas power by Gujarat, since the

transportation cost quoted was very high.

Other beneficiaries in the above Commercial Committee meeting had intimated that

they would avail power from the non- APM gas within their entitlements and would

not commit any schedule other than their own entitlements on non-APM gas, and

therefore would not commit to avail Gujarat entitlement of power from non-APM gas

and expressed that the un-availed share of non-APM gas power by Gujarat should

be treated as URS power and treated as per the existing practice of availing the URS

power by other beneficiaries. They had further intimated that they would not share

the “take or pay” charges for URS power corresponding to non-APM gas power

which is not utilised by others.


After deliberations in the 60th CCM, following was agreed by beneficiaries for

scheduling of power on non-APM gas in line with provisions contained in IEGC on

scheduling and despatch code:-

NTPC will give fuel wise Declaration of capacity availability (viz on APM gas

/non-APM gas /RLNG/Naphtha.)

Beneficiaries will give fuel wise requirement for them. (viz on APM gas /non-

APM gas /RLNG/Naphtha )

The un-availed share of non-APM gas power by Gujarat shall be treated as

(un-requisitioned power) URS power.

The non-APM gas under URS shall be dealt as per present procedure of

availing the URS power by other beneficiaries.

Beneficiaries will not share the “take or pay” charges for the URS portion of

non-APM gas power for Gujarat; they would share the “take or pay” charges

in respect of their own entitlements.

NTPC will keep informed the beneficiaries about the negotiations on the non-

APM gas pricing with GAIL being made by NTPC.

During TCC meeting, NTPC informed that they have taken up the matter with GAIL

and the transportation charges are likely to be reduced by around 50% with

retrospective effect and therefore requested GUVNL to confirm about agreeing to the

same.

GUVNL intimated that they shall intimate their decision within two days and would be

accepted.

WRPC committee noted that since the transportation charges are decided by the pipeline regulator, therefore the transportation charges are to be agreed as decided by the regulator or by appeal to the regulator for any change; however the concern of GUVNL about the high transportation charges was noted.


ITEM No.9: DECLARATION OF DC ON RLNG FOR RGPPL. During 60th Commercial Committee meeting of WRPC held on 23.12.2011, RGPPL

representative stated that GOI has allocated a total of 7.6 MMSCMD gas from KG6

gas field of RIL and 0.9 MMSCMD of ONGC gas fields for power generation

corresponding to 80% capacity of RGPPL plant. He intimated that on account of

reduced production from KG6 gas field of RIL the supply to RGPPL has got reduced

to 5.4 MMSCMD. Therefore the ongoing short supply of domestic fuel gas allocated

to RGPPL on long term basis by GoI, is leading to non-utilisation of RGPPL machine

capability. In view of above, in order to mitigate hardship caused to its beneficiaries

and to meet the contractual obligation as per PPA, RGPPL has arranged spot

RLNG from GAIL on the terms such that no liability like take or pay etc is passed on

to the beneficiary except the fuel cost for actual dispatch requisitioned by them.

RGPPPL is separately indicating 445 MW capacity being available from 17.12.11 on

RLNG and requested WRLDC to incorporate the same in the DC of RGPPL in

addition to the DC on long-term gas contracts with RIL and ONGC in accordance

with relevant clause 6.4.16 of IEGC Regulations, 2010.

Commercial Committee discussed and in view of the deliberations and conclusion on

DC & scheduling on non-APM gas for Kawas and Gandhar, the Committee

expressed that the DC & scheduling in case of RGPPL may be dealt as per

provisions contained in IEGC clause 6.4.9 & 6.4.16 on scheduling and despatch

code respectively.

MSEDCL vide no CE/PP/WRPC/1496 dated 17.01.2012 (enclosed at Annex -9) has

intimated that variable cost of generation of RLNG as indicated by RGPPL is Rs 7.05

per unit. This is very high compared with present power available in market at Rs 3.5

to Rs 4.50 per unit and as such there will be additional financial burden on

consumers. And as per PPA dated 10.04.2007 between MSEDCL and RGPPL,

RGPPL is under obligation to obtain approval from MSEDCL on contracting terms

and the price before entering into Gas Supply Agreement. RGPPL has not taken

consent of MSEDCL before making agreement with GAIL for RLNG.

Further as intimated by MSEDCL that as per clause No.5.9 of PPA between RGPPL

and MSEDCL dated 10.04.2007, the condition of GSA/GTA having commercial


implications (for example bearing on plant availability, contracted quantity, price

components, Take or pay provisions, penalties and damages etc.) shall be signed

separately with MSEDCL as a supplementary agreement. The total required

Gas/LNG is envisaged to be procured through short term contracts / long term

contracts through GAIL and under the directions of GOI, the details of which shall be

furnished in due course. RGPPL shall be required to obtain approval of MSEDCL on

contracting terms and price before entering into GAS/GTA contracts.

During the TCC meeting WRLDC intimated that as per IEGC the capacity is to be

declared by the RGPPL while scheduling is to be done on requisitioning by

MSEDCL. Further on query by MSEDCL, WRLDC intimated that as per IEGC they

are empowered to check the correctness of declaration of capacity, if required.

During WRPC meeting the issue was deliberated and WRP Committee noted the views of MSEDCL, RGPPL and WRLDC. ITEM NO.10: LEVY OF STATE TRANSMISSION CHARGES FOR USAGE OF

CHHATTISGARH STATE GRID

During 59th CCM the subject matter of levy of State Transmission Charges for usage

of Chhattisgarh State Grid in respect of STOA charges was discussed on the request

of CSPTCL. Committee suggested that WRLDC would look into the request of

CSPTCL in view of the existing provisions under CSERC regulations and the CERC

Regulations for Open Access in intra-state transmission and examine issue in detail

in the light of Regulations and would revert back so that charges do not get raised

twice.

CSPTCL vide letter No. 03-02/EERA/STU/Chrgs/WRLDC/2478 dated 14th December

2011 (copy enclosed at Annexure- 10) has again requested to resolve the issue.

In 60th CCM matter was discussed. CSPTCL representative had stated that CSERC

regulation entitles CSPTCL to recover the reserved capacity on the STOA; however

WRLDC are recovering the charges as per the approved quantum of STOA,

resulting in under recovery by CSPTCL.


GM, WRLDC had stated that as per CERC Regulations, 2009 for grant of LTA,

MTOA and STOA, the regulation gives clear guidelines to collect the STOA charges

by RLDCs in case of use of State transmission system and for CTU transmission

system as per the rates and in the manner as approved vide above mentioned

CERC Regulations, 2009 on the approved quantum of STOA. Therefore under the

CERC Regulations, RLDCs cannot recover the STOA charges on reserved capacity

of the intra state transmission system.

Committee noted that short-term open access charges shall be applicable as per

CERC (Open Access inter-State Transmission) (Amendment) Regulations 2009.

However for applications received after Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

(Sharing of Inter State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations 2010 came

into force, the short-term open access charges shall be applicable as per CERC

(Sharing of Inter State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations 2010 and

relevant CERC orders. All payments associated with Bilateral Transactions shall be

made by the Applicant to the nodal agency (i.e. RLDC) as per terms of payment

under commercial conditions for bilateral transaction according to the Procedure for

Scheduling approved by the Commission.

In view of above, it was noted by CSPDL that levy of state transmission charges for

usage of Chhattisgarh State in case of above is in line with the CERC Central

Electricity Regulatory Commission (Open Access in inter-State Transmission)

(Amendment) Regulations, 2009

During the above discussions, regarding matter relating to short-term open access

charges, GM NSPCL had stated that CTU had granted MTOA to Visvesvaraya Iron

& Steel plant Bhadrawati (VISP) of SAIL for 10.92 MW from NSPCL (500MW)

Generating station in Bhilai Chhattisgarh with CTU connectivity granted at Raipur

(PG) through existing 400kV NSPCL- Raipur D/c (PG) line. He indicated that

CSPTCL had requested for STU charges for the transaction under this MTOA

granted by CTU for availing power by VISP form NSPCL station having the direct

connectivity with CTU network as above.


Committee expressed that as per deliberations in 17th WRP Committee meeting

open access charges for STU system would be applicable only in case any quantum

of power out of present 182.5 MW allocation of BSP-SAIL power gets re-allocated to

other SAIL units outside the State (viz Bhadravati and Salem). However in the

current scenario, MTOA for 10.92 MW granted by CTU to SAIL- VISP is not out of

182.5 MW quantum of BSP-SAIL allocation, but the same is out of the balance

quantum at disposal of the NSPCL station against which the MTOA has been

granted by CTU to VISP for the CTU network through 400kV NSPCL- Raipur D/c

dedicated line of NSPCL. Hence STU open access charges will not become

applicable in this case.

WRP Committee noted as above. ITEM No. 11: FIBRE OPTICS NETWORK IN WESTERN REGION In the 18th WRPC meeting held on 1.10.2011, WR Power Committee discussed the

matter and suggested that a separate commercial agreement for master

communication plan is necessary which is to be signed between beneficiaries and

PGCIL. PGCIL agreed to proceed on the basis of above to draft an agreement which

would be circulated to the members so as to complete entire process for agreement

finalization in a month’s time to avoid any delays in the implementation process of

master plan.

PGCIL during 60th Commercial Committee meeting of WRPC held on 23.12.2011,

had intimated that as per the decision of Committee in the 18th WRPC meeting

POWERGRID had circulated the proposed commercial agreement for

Communication system to the constituents of the region in the first week of Nov’2011

and Gujarat & MP had signed the new commercial agreement and that Goa and

Maharashtra were yet to sign the commercial agreement.

Goa representative in the 60th CCM intimated that they would sign the commercial

agreement shortly.


In the above meeting, PGCIL had further intimated that Goa and Maharashtra were

yet to sign the commercial agreement. Goa intimated that they would sign the

commercial agreement shortly.

MSEDCL had intimated that they were not willing to sign separate commercial

agreement for Establishment of Fibre Optic (FO) based wideband connectivity under

the project “Master Communication Plan in Western Region”, and indicated that as

the project is part of the transmission system, and therefore suggested that this part

may be included in the PoC transmission charges. PGCIL representative intimated

that the tariff of Establishment of Fibre Optic (FO) based wideband connectivity

under the project “Master Communication Plan in Western Region”, would be

determined by CERC and requested MSETCL to sign the commercial agreement.

Commercial Committee suggested that in the light of progress made on the status as

above, PGCIL may discuss issue with MSEDCL to resolve so that the necessary

agreement is signed early. Powergrid therefore vide letter No C-LDC-WR-FO-Ltr

dated 10.01.2012 (enclosed at Annex-11) had requested MSETCL for signing the

commercial agreement.

PGCIL vide letter no. C/OS/WRPC-19th/Agenda dated 19.1.2012 while intimating as

above that the new commercial agreement had already been signed by the MP,

Gujarat, Chhattisgarh and UTs and it is yet to be signed by Maharashtra and Goa.

In the above regard PGCIL in the above letter have further indicated that as

discussed earlier that the contract for this work could not be awarded unless the

commercial agreement was signed. Also WRLDC were facing problems in absence

of reliable communication network and the status of the communication system is

being monitored by Hon’ble CERC also.

PGCIL intimated that all have signed except Goa. MSETCL also confirmed that they

have signed agreement for the FO plan with PGCIL on 24.1.2011. CEE (Elect) , Goa

Electricity Deptt intimated that Goa would sign the commercial agreement shortly



ITEM NO. 12: REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING SCADA SYSTEM INSTALLED AT SLDCs OF GUJARAT, MADHYA PRADESH AND CHHATTISGARH STATES OF WESTERN REGION.

In 18th WRPC meeting, in view of decisions taken in 16th WRPC meeting to follow

unified approach for SCADA/EMS up-gradation/replacement works in Western

region by adopting similar approach as followed during ULDC project so that

similarity of system may be maintained and technical expertise gained in the region

availed for mutual benefits, PGCIL had informed that they shall discuss with

POSOCO on the above suggestion and would make efforts to maintain similarity of

the States’ systems with WRLDC system. PGCIL had further intimated that based on

common specification the BOQ list would be prepared by them and discussed in

SCADA OM Committee to be convened by WRLDC and the Committee would be

appraised accordingly and action taken for going ahead with the completion of

necessary requirements for going ahead with project early. PGCIL had also

intimated that the expenses for the system would be proposed to be charged to

SLDCs through tariff.

In 60th Commercial Committee meeting of WRPC, matter was discussed on status

for replacement of subject SCADA systems in view of the decisions taken in the 16th

and 18th WRPC meetings held on 12.2.2011 and 1.10.2011 respectively.

In the above Commercial Committee meeting, WRLDC and PGCIL had intimated

that the tendering of SCADA/EMS up-gradation /replacement works by NRLDC has

already been done similar to the above requirements and CERC order on tariff

mechanism was awaited and intimated that the same approach would be followed in

WR.

PGCIL vide letter no. C/OS/WRPC-19th/Agenda dated 19.1.2012 intimated that as

per the discussions in 18th WRPC meeting, procurement process should start early,

PGCIL in line with CERC order have decided that procurement of WRLDC and

SLDC, SCADA/EMS system shall be done through a single tender and that the BOQ

and specification has been circulated to the constituents vide their letter dated

13.01.2012. PGCIL have proposed to finalize the same during the meeting of the

SCADA O&M committee scheduled on 24.01.2012 and the NIT for


expansion/upgradation of SCADA/EMS system at WRLDC and SLDCs of WR was

scheduled to be issued by PGCIL in the month of Feb’2012.

During TCC meeting PGCIL intimated that as per discussion in 10th SCADA

committee meeting, the load dispatch control centres for Goa and DD &DNH have

also been included and only one NIT for all SLDCs (except MSLDC) and WRLDC

would be issued.

MSETCL intimated that out of requirement for 227 nos. RTUs for Maharashtra, 140

RTUs are adequate and requested WRLDC to review the requirement. MSETCL

further intimated that w.e.f June 2012 the data from the RTUs at RGPPL and

Tarapur 1,2 shall require to be reported to WRLDC instead of to MSLDC in view of

the coming up of new system at SLDC, WRLDC confirmed that it would make

necessary arrangements for data receipt.

WRP Committee noted as above. ITEM No. 13: WIDE AREA MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (WAMS) IN WR Background: In the 18th WR Power Committee meeting the issue of WAMS in WR

was further discussed and it was suggested that next WAMS/PMU Group meeting

may discuss all the remaining points pertaining to Part I and II including Commercial

aspects, roles and responsibilities of project partners under the changed scenario

based on the receipt of the revised proposal from IIT-B for Part II may be finalized

and outcome of the same appraised in the next WRPC meeting so that project can

be taken up for implementation by PGCIL.

A meeting of the WAMS Group was held on 10.12.2011 at Vadodara and the

following were recommended by the WAMS Group:

(A) Pertaining to Location, Cost, Funding,IPR: 1) Locations: The group recommended that the 400 kV and 765 kV network

upto financial year 2013-14 shall be taken as base, keeping project one year

time frame, and locations may be frozen by running optimal placements by


IIT-B. WRLDC shall furnish necessary network data to IIT-B and IIT-B agreed

to provide results by 21st December 2011, before the next WRPC meeting to

be held in January /February 2012.

2) Cost Estimate of the Hardware part of WAMS project: Based on the

finalized PMU locations, the estimate of cost of the project pertaining to

hardware, communication lease costs and hardware including PMUs, PDCs,

hardware at RLDC, SLDCs and PMU groups etc can be finalized. It was

decided that once optimal results for PMU Locations are finalized by 21st

December 2011, WRLDC were requested to prepare ‘Bill of Quantities

(BOQ)’.

3) Cost Estimate of the Software part of WAMS project: It was decided that

Estimate by IIT-B for software analytics along with terms and conditions shall

be furnished to WRLDC by the IIT-B by 21st December 2011. Since the

project is to comprise of implementation of measurement part combined with

the software analytics part, in Iine with the original approval accorded by

Hon’ble CERC, the cost estimate for this software analytics along with the

above cost estimate for hardware would be the total cost estimate of the

project.

4) Funding: The Group recommended that the above cost shall be met to the

extent of Rs 10.97 crore from CERC approved UI fund for the above project

and balance shall be shared by the constituents of WR.

5) Administrative Route of the Project: The following were the main steps to

speedily implement the WAMS Project of WR:

(a) Estimate the cost of the project and BOQ as above.

(b) Obtain approval from WR Power Committee.

(c) Filing of petition with CERC by WRLDC in the change scenario.

(d) Tender activity /implementation by WRLDC / PGCIL and the constituents involved during the negotiations.

(e) CERC approval

(f) Awarding of contracts.


6) Analytics Software Development : The Group observed that software

pertaining to analytics for the applications envisaged are so far not available

in commercial packages. Therefore the Group felt that there is a need for

academic support in the mathematical modeling and synergy from practicing

engineers in implementing the applications. IIT-B is associated with the

project from the formulation stages. IIT-B is willing to develop a working

professional software, provide license to constituents and support AMC, and

constituent users can develop for their systems applications in future at

mutually agreed costs negotiated by the constituents with IIT-B. The Group

therefore recommended to implement the software analytics developed by IIT-

B.

7) IPR : IIT-B clarified that since it is developing the software, as per IIT’s

Standard Terms and Conditions, the Intellectual Property Rights belong to IIT-

B. It was clarified by IIT-B, that the Software which shall be installed at RLDC

and SLDCs gives the RLDC and SLDC User Rights by which IIT-B would

develop working professional software and provide AMC Support. Further if

any of the WR constituent user wishes to implement or develop a new

scheme or application pertaining to their system with the WAMS data

individually, then IIT-B shall provide services for the same at mutually agreed

costs. Some constituent members were of the view that IPR Rights should be

made available to the constituents of WR. SE (Opn), WRPC stated that as per

Hon’ble CERC order “..all revenues generated by PGCIL/WRLDC (out of its

share of 24%) through IPR by commercial exploitation of the project be

refunded to the fund, after retaining 25% thereof.” Therefore any revenue

arising from IPR shall be as per the directive of Hon’ble CERC and as such

requested the members to appraise their managements accordingly.

8) Real Time Data : It was recommended to extend the real time data to IIT-B

during development of software analytics period and IIT-B shall sign the Data

Non - Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with WRLDC ( on behalf of WRPC)

(B) Pertaining to BOQ Technical Points: 1) Reporting: After discussing latency of the applications proposed under this

project, it was decided that Data routing shall be as under: PMU or PMUs at a


location to substation PDC to State SLDC PDC to RLDC PDC and further

from RLDC PDC to all states SLDC PDC. If required, substation PDC may

also report to RLDC.

2) PMUs: The following points pertaining to PMUs were agreed:

(a) P Class PMUs shall be used in this project

(b) Considering possible unbalance in phases in power system operation in

applications (for example under faulted conditions) it was decided that the

PMU shall measure and report to PDCs the three phase (R-Y-B) currents

and (R-Y-B) voltages (in addition to positive sequence quantities).

(c) Each PMU typically measures at least two voltage inputs. So each bus

section voltage can be measured and this would be useful while analyzing

disturbances.

(d) It was decided to mention in the tender specifications the location, bay

diagrams and current measurements required bus-wise, rather than

specifying a PMU only with specific number of inputs for current or voltage.

3) PDCs: The following points pertaining to PDCs were agreed:

(a) PDC shall have upward scalability to cater to PMU growth in population.

(b) It was recommended to work out BOQ with an option of back up PDCs at

RLDC and SLDCs.

(c) At present as per earlier list of locations, at least 168 three phase currents

and at least 24 voltages were anticipated. With additional locations the

number of three phase current and voltage inputs will increase. The same

can be frozen for this project by 15th Dec 2011. It is estimated PDCs shall

have to handle at least 200 PMU input capacity.

4) User Terminals: It was clarified that there shall be one additional / separate

user terminal at each SLDC for PMU group/ Study Groups of the State on

similar lines as provided to WRPC at WRLDC employing Dual LAN structure.

Necessary block diagram and BOQ may be accordingly modified.

5) Requirement of terminal for CTU and NLDC was noted and recommended.

6) Number of staff required for Training requires to be enhanced than projected

at present.


7) Communication of PMU data using ULDC/PGCIL fiber optic network shall be

done and in case of non-availability of communication network or end

equipments, availability of communication network shall be arranged by

PGCIL for all locations in this project.

8) Based on the inputs received IIT-B shall estimate the requirement of servers'

specifications for their applications and data historian. Based on this cost

estimate shall be prepared.

(C)- Points requiring review due to changed scenario of consortium break-up. In the changed scenario, the following points shall require consideration while

approaching Hon’ble CERC by WRLDC.

Sl No

Item Detail

1 Para 3 Clause c Regarding proposal to CSIR under New Millenium Technology Initiative

2 Para 3 clause (f) Regarding estimated cost 3 Para 3 clause g Regarding soft loan 4 Para 3 clause h Loan for PGCIL from CSIR 5 Para 3 Clause j Role of partners 6 Para 3 clause (k)

(v) Sharing of IPR

7 Para 3 clause m Regarding MSETCL project Based on discussions in meeting held on 10.12.2011 and 14.12.2011 with IIT-B,

further work carried out by IIT-B, WRLDC vide letter No. WRLDC/OS/1517/12 dated

23.12.2012 have submitted a write-up on BOQ and estimates. It is proposed to

convene meeting with WRPC WAMS group on 30.1.2012 to discuss the

BOQ/estimates submitted above. The outcome of same shall be appraised to

TCC/WRPC during meeting on 9.2.2012 and 10.2.2012.

TCC Discussion: TCC was appraised that based on the recommendations of

WAMS group the BOQ and the estimate of Rs 74.138 Crores (details at Annexure-

13) for the project was prepared by WRLDC and which was submitted to the WAMS

group and discussed by the group. In the meeting WRLDC intimated that the cost

would be around Rs 85.64 Crores including communication costs not accounted


earlier. TCC discussed the matter and had recommended that WRLDC shall require

to appraise Hon’ble CERC regarding the status of WAMS Project and the cost

estimates through a petition for directives in the matter.

WRPC Discussion:

WR Power Committee discussed the issue of WAMS implementation in the region

on the technical requirements worked out by the WAMS group. Upon appraisal to the

Committee on the basis of discussions in WAMS group and the TCC meetings on

above, GM WRLDC explained about the necessity to implement the system in view

of essential nature and complexities involved in day-to-day interconnected grid

operation and is highly advantageous in carrying out activities of monitoring and

analysis of the grid operation. He stated that with the consortium backing out,

estimates being gone much higher on account of additional requirements

recommended by the WAMS group, the funding for the full estimated amount from

PSDF may not be possible. Upon query by the Committee, WRLDC intimated that in

other regions the pilot WAMS facility is being implemented by the RLDCs through

CAPEX plan funds of concerned RLDCs.

The Committee on deliberations resolved that the implementation of the WAMS

facility in the region is an important technical requirement and should be

implemented. GM WRLDC upon query by the Committee intimated that the WRLDC

would be willing to implement the facility in Western Region on similar lines. The

Committee therefore further resolved that the WAMS system may be implemented

by WRLDC through CAPEX funds and upon suggestion by MPPTCL and other

members further resolved that in this implementation process by WRLDC there shall

be no duplication of the facility at any of the locations where WAMS systems would

have been already implemented.

WR Power Committee approved for implementing the WAMS Project in the region by WRLDC through WRLDC CAPEX fund on lines of the above decision of the Committee.


ITEM NO.14: RECONCILIATION OF UI AND REC ACCOUNTS WRLDC vide WRLDC/OS/15501/11 dated 14th Dec, 2011 (Copy enclosed at

Annexure-14) has intimated that WRLDC vide letter dated 4th October 2011 had

intimated all the constituents to reconcile the UI and REC accounts for the period

April’2011 to September’2011. All the details of payments/receipts for the said period

are available at WRLDC web site. All the UI and REC pool members except NTPC

are yet to complete the reconciliation process. WRLDC has requested to complete

the reconciliation latest by 15th Jan’2012 by all the members. If no response is

received by 15th Jan’2012, the statement published by WRLDC in the web site will be

considered as deemed to be reconciled.

Goa representative intimated that they would depute their representative in a

fortnight for reconciling the accounts.

WRP Committee noted as above. ITEM.NO.15: STATUS OF LC OPENING WRT BILL TOWARDS WRLDC FEES AND CHARGES. WRLDC vide WRLDC/OS/15501/11 dated 14th Dec, 2011 (Copy enclosed at

Annexure-15) has intimated that as per clause 28 of Chapter-5 CERC Regulation

dated 18th September 2009, in the matter of fees and charges of Regional Load

Despatch Centre and other related matters,

Quote

28. Rebate: For payment of bills through letter of Credit on presentation, rebate of

2% shall be allowed. Where payments are made other than through letter of credit

within a period of one month of presentation of bills, a rebate of 1% shall be allowed”

Unquote

Hon’ble CERC vide its Suo-Motu order dated 1st December 2011 has directed

Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Goa and Daman& Diu to show cause by 20.12.2011

as to why appropriate action under section 142 of Electricity Act, 2033 should not be

taken against for non-compliance of provisions of 10(4) of the UI regulations.


WRLDC through its letter dated 3rd May 2011 had intimated the amount of LC to be

opened. The status of LC opened by WR entities for the year 2011-12 is as follows.

Table: Status of LC opened by the entities of Western Region for the year 2011-12.

Sl

No.

WR Entity who

have to open LC

No of weeks

in which UI

payable

Average

payable weekly

UI for 2010-

11(Rs in lakhs)

LC Amount

(Rs in

lakhs)

Status of LC

opening

1 CSPDCL 8 135 149 Not opened

2 MPPTCL 25 733 3946 Not opened

3 Goa 14 140 155 Not opened

4 D&D 43 108 511 * Not opened

5 JINDAL POWER 26 172 189

LC for 189

laks opened

on 9th

Dec'2011

Note: "*" LC of D&D increased to Rs.511 laks, as per clause 10 (4) of UI Regulation

(Amendment) 2010 In 60th Commercial Committee meeting, the Committee requested that all the

entities which had not yet opened LC and may do the needful at the earliest.

WRP Committee noted as above. ITEM No.16: PAYMENTS OF UI AND REACTIVE ENERGY CHARGES

16.1 As per the information received from WRLDC, the status of payment to UI pool

account and Reactive Energy Pool account as on 19.01.2012 of the current financial

year is given below: -

I. Status of UI Charges Payable/Receivable to UI Pool Account


Last updated on 19/01/12 (+) Payable / (-) Receivable from Pool Amount in Rs.

Total dues Payments

overdue Principal Principal CSPDCL -20,341,142 MPPTCL 270,879,690 254,372,362 GETCO 95,860,242 MSEDCL 34,968,514 Goa 55,459,185 33,790,025 D&D -856,676 DNH -9,896,066 NTPC -72,560,472 NR Exchange 587,338,679 585,639,547 SR Exchange 9,645,436 ER Exchange 151,737,804 166,746,877 JINDAL POWER -3,059,506 HVDC V'chal -163,345 HVDC B'vati -657,530 Lanco Power Ltd -15,580,580 NSPCL -1,962,564 ACB India Ltd. -4,700,741 RGPPL -6,738,808 BALCO 9,434 CGPL UMPP MUNDRA 8,745,883 DCPP JSPL 31,525,851

Differential amount from capping due to injn. >105% -205,885,851

Amount arose from additional UI -361,445,446

Amount arose from capping on Over Injn.and under drawal -959,941,565

Net Total in capping & Addl. UI A/c -478,992,322 Note : This includes : 1. UI Accounts issued upto 41st week of 2011-12 ie., 02.01.12 to 08.01.12.. 2. UI Payments received upto 17.01.12 and distributed upto 17.01.12


II. Status of Reactive Energy Charges Payable to REC Pool Account Last updated on 20/01/12 (+) Payable / (-) Receivable from Pool Amount in Rs. Total dues Payments overdue Principal Principal CSPDCL -16,226,385 -15,833,104 MPPTCL 12,787,590 12,915,871 GETCO -2,142,755 -1,899,617 MSEDCL -5,706,799 -5,513,458 Goa 632,819 528,859 DD 479,462 351,162 DNH 5,121,671 4,395,890 TOTAL -5,054,397 -5,054,397 *When Receivables are more than payable, total of all receivables made equal to payable. *When all are receivable, all receivables made zero . Note : This includes : 1. REC Accounts issued upto 41st week of 2011-12 ie.,02.01.2012 To 08.01.2012 2. REC Payments distributed upto 22.12.11

WRP Committee noted as above. ITEM No.17: DECLARATION OF GENERATING UNITS INTO COMMERCIAL

OPERATION. 17.1 NTPC vide letter 01:CD:225-B Dtd. 29.09.2011 have intimated that after the

successful testing and commissioning, the first unit of 660MW of Sipat STPS Stage-I

was declared on Commercial operation w.e.f. 00:00Hrs of 01.10.2011. 17.2 M/s ACB (India) Limited vide letter ACBIL/CEA/11-12/1249 Dtd. 19.12.2011

have intimated that Unit-I of 2x135MW at Kasaipalli Korba has successfully been

commissioned on 13.12.2011.

17.3 Upon intimation received from them, Jindal Steel & power limited-DCPP has

declared the COD of unit-3 of 135MW at Dongamahua, Raigarh , Chhattisgarh on

01st Jan’2012.



ITEM No.18: DECLARATION OF TRANSMISSION ELEMENTS INTO

COMMERCIAL OPERATION BY PGCIL 18.1 PGCIL vide letter WR-II/VDR/COML/7515 dated 02.12.2011 (Copy enclosed

at Annexure- 18) intimated that in accordance with the decision taken during

meeting held on 5th Aug.2011 under the Chairmanship of Jt. Secretary (UMPP) MoP

(GoI), the contingency arrangement of 400 kV Mundra-Bachhau-Limbdi D/c

transmission line, i.e. from tapping point of 400 kV Bacchau-Vadavi D/c line to

Limbdi S/S under Mundra UMPP transmission system was charged successfully on

27.11.2011 and put into regular operation in WR, and the same is under commercial

operation w.e.f. 1st December 2011. Accordingly, the monthly transmission charges

of the above transmission element will be payable by all concerned from 1st Dec,

2011.

GETCO representative in 60th CCM had indicated that as the original scheme

comprises of Mundra-Limdi D/c which under contingency arrangement is changed to

Mundra-Bachau-Bunching point- Limdi resulting into a single circuit between

Bhachau to 400 kV Bachhau-Limbdi D/c section. In view of this being a temporary

arrangement line had suggested that the commercial operation should be considered

subsequent to 400 kV Bhachau-Mundra D/c section of 400 kV Mundra-Limbdi D/c

line gets ready.

18.2 PGCIL vide letter No. WRTS-I:COMM:NGP/1018 dated 01.11.2011 intimated

that ICT-III at Pune along with bays under WRSS-VI has been put into regular

operation in WR and the same will be under commercial operation w.e.f. 01st Nov

2011. Accordingly, the monthly transmission charges of this system will be payable

from 01st Nov 2011 by concerned DICs as per CERC (sharing of transmission

charges & losses) regulation 2010.

18.3 PGCIL vide letter No. WRTS-I:COMMl:NGP/1054 dated 01.12.2011 have

intimated that part of Korba-Birsinghpur TL (under WRSS-II Set “D”) from Korba

gantry to location No.176/0 has been commissioned successfully for according

temporary connectivity to M/s Vandana vidyut Ltd. Accordingly, the monthly


transmission charges of this part will be shared among M/s BALCO & M/s Vandana

vidyut Ltd. from 01st Dec.2011 till commissioning of remaining part of the line as per

agreement dtd.15th July 2011.

18.4 PGCIL vide letter No. WRTS-I:COMMl:NGP/1067 dated 02.01.2012 have

intimated that 400/220kV ICT-III at Wardha along with bays under WRSS-VI has

been put into regular operation in WR and the same will be under commercial

operation w.e.f.01st January 2012. Accordingly, the monthly transmission charges of

this system will be payable from 01st Jan 2012 by concerned DICs as per CERC

(sharing of transmission charges & losses) regulation 2010.

WRP Committee noted as above. ITEM No. 19: RENOVATION AND MODERNISATION OF WRPC OFFICE

BUILDING

The WR Power Committee was intimated that PGCIL vide letter No. WRTS-

I/ENGG/WRPC/2011/357 dated 5.12.2011 had informed that tendering for above

work is already in process & QR bids received by them were under evaluation.

PGCIL as per the decision in 18th WRPC meeting held on 1.10.2011 requested to

transfer available funds to POWERGRID for further action. In the 18th WRPC

meeting, it was decided that the available amount in R & M Fund may be transferred

to PGCIL who shall maintain a separate account and till R & M contract is finalized

and the funds be kept in a FDR, interest earned may also be credited to this R&M

fund after deduction of taxes at source etc. Subsequently PGCIL vide letter no.

WRTS-I/ENGG/WRPC/2011/382 dated 20.12.2011 provided the bank details for

transfer of amount to this account. In view of the above, WRPC Sectt. received

concurrence from Chairman WRPC in the recent past for transfer of amount

contributed by constituent members of WR sharing the expenditure on R&M work to

PGCIL. The transfer of amount to PGCIL is accordingly under process.

During TCC meeting held on 09.02.2012, PGCIL intimated that tendering for the

subject work had been initiated with publication of NIT in newspapers on 21.10.2011.

During the period of sale of Bid Documents, 05 (Five) parties had purchased the bid

documents. All the 05 (Five) bidders have submitted their bids before the last date


and time for submission of bids. The first envelope containing Integrity Pact of the 05

(Five) bidders was opened on schedule date i.e. on 05.12.2011. The envelopes

containing EMD of all the five bidders were opened on the scheduled date and time

on 05.12.2011 by the Bid Opening Committee. PGCIL added that In the Qualifying

requirement for the package the minimum financial position of bidder as well as the

minimum quantum of work to be executed by bidders has been stipulated. Since the

package involves renovation and interior works, the aesthetics and quality of work is

important. It is felt that this feature cannot be captured by review of completion

certificates/ Performance Reports. In view of this, it is felt appropriate that

assessment of quality of works executed by the qualified bidders may be carried out

by a separate committee. Also, it is recommended that the above mentioned

assessment committee may also look into the works executed by M/s C B & Sons

vis-à-vis scope of work of instant package to ascertain the capability of the bidder to

execute the instant work. ED WRTS-I, PGCIL requested to constitute a committee

deriving member from constituents member of WRPC.

Superintending Engineer (Comml, Admn and Services), WRPC, stated that views of

chairman of the subcommittee on R & M will be intimated during WRPC meeting.

During WRP Committee meeting, Superintending Engineer (Comml, Admn and

Services), WRPC, intimated that chairman of the subcommittee on R & M has

opined that a committee deriving member from constituents member of WRPC is not

required as the work is entrusted to PGCIL they may take decisions on the subject

as per the internal procedure/norms of PGCIL .

Chairman WRPC said that he was in agreement with the views of chairman of the

subcommittee on R & M and that PGCIL may go ahead as per internal norms of

PGCIL in this matter.

ITEM No. 20: GRANT OF LTOA/ MTOA /CONNECTIVITY FOR GENERATION

DEVELOPERS BY POWERGRID. CTU granted LTA to following generation projects as per the following details:

Quantum allocated to

Sr. No.

Generation Developer

Installed Capacity

LTA/LTOA granted

ER WR NR SR PGCIL letter no. C/ SEF/W/INT/1111/06 dated 07.12.2011. 1 Chattisgarh Surguja 6x660 4000 - 4000 -



Sr. No.


Installed Capacity

LTA/LTOA granted

ER WR NR SR Power Ltd.

PGCIL letter no. C/SEF/W/06/INT/1111/03 dated 07.12.11 2 Shapoorji Pallonji Energy

(Gujarat) Pvt. Ltd. 1320 500 - 255 - 245

PGCIL letter no. C/SEF/W/06/INT/1111/04 dated 07.12.11 3 MB Power (MP) TPS 1200 420 - 420 - - PGCIL letter no. C/SEF/W/06/INT/1111/05 dated 07.12.11 4 Kakrapar 3 & 4 1400 1400 - 1400 - - PGCIL email dated 23.01.12 5 Hindustan Electricity

Generation Ltd.

3x379MW (1137MW)

379 265 -- 114 -

6 Dahanu Solar Power Pvt. Ltd.

40 33 - 33 - -

PGCIL granted Provisional Long Term Access (LTA) as per the following details: Sr. No.


Installed Capacity

LTA/LTOA granted


SR WR NR PGCIL email dated 23.01.12 1 NTPC Ltd- Lara STPP- I

(1600MW)

2x800MW 1586.51 MW - 1586.51 405

PGCIL granted connectivity to following generation projects as per the following details: PGCIL letter no. C/SEF/W/06/INT/1108/01 dated 5.8.2011 Sr. No.


Installed capacity

Effective Date

Connectivity granted for

Point at which connectivity is granted

1 Indiabulls Power Ltd.

5x270MW Jun-13 1350 MW Amravati TPS Stage-I 400kV bus through bus extension

Details of above LTOA/LTA are available as additional Annexure on WRPC website.

PGCIL granted MTOA to applicants (as per the list enclosed at Annexure-20).



ITEM No.21: ONGOING TRANSMISSION AND GENERATION SCHEMES IN WESTERN REGION

21.1 The progress of ongoing transmission projects in Western Region under

following categories are enclosed at Annexure-21.

a) Progress of transmission schemes associated with evacuation and system

strengthening scheme for own Generating Station.

b) Progress of transmission schemes associated with evacuation and system

strengthening scheme for Generating Station set up by IPP.

c) Progress of interconnected transmission schemes associated with PGCIL

Sub-station.

d) Progress of transmission schemes and system strengthening schemes set up

through IPTC route.

e) Progress of Intra-state transmission schemes

The present status of lines identified for completion on priority is as below:-

S.No. Line Implementing

Agency Anticipated target

1 400 kV D/C line from Bhusawal II to Aurangabad (Loc. No. 1 to 270)

Maharashtra Sep-11

2 400 kV Vapi(PG)-Navi Mumbai D/C

PGCIL Mar-13

3 400 kV D/C Mundra-Jetpur PGCIL May -12 4 400 kV D/C Gandhar-Navsari PGCIL March -12 5 400 kV D/C Navsari- Mumbai line(Boisar) PGCIL March-13 6 LILO of Lonikhand (MSEB)- Kalwa

(MSEB) 400 kV D/C at Pune (PG) Reliance (IPTC route)

March -12

7 400 kV D/C Rajgarh(PG) – Karamsad (GEB)

Reliance (IPTC route)

November-12

8 400kV D/C Vindhyachal-IV - Vindhyachal Pooling Station line (Q)

PGCIL November-12

9 765kV S/C Vindhyachal Pooling Station - Satna line (Ckt-I)

PGCIL February-13

10 765kV S/C Vindhyachal Pooling Station - Satna line (234km+12km D/C Portion)Ckt-II

PGCIL February-13

11 LILO of 765 kV S/C Sipat-Seoni line at WR Pooling station near Sipat

PGCIL March-12

12 LILO of 765 kV S/C 2nd Sipat-Seoni line at WR Pooling station near Sipat at

PGCIL March-12


S.No. Line Implementing Agency

Anticipated target

Bilaspur (Pooling Stn.) 13 400 kV D/C Raipur(PG)-Wardha(PG) line PGCIL December-12 14 400kV D/C Mauda STPS - Wardha line

(Quad) PGCIL April-12

15 765 kV 2nd S/C Seoni - Wardha line PGCIL Mar. 12 16 400 kV D/C Korba (NTPC) – Birsingpur

(MPGENCO) PGCIL February-12

21.2 Important EHV lines commissioned during the year 2011-12:

S.No. Line Charged on

1 400 kV D/C Vadinar-Hadala 25.04.11

2 400 kV D/C Korba STPS-Raipur 21.06.11

3 400 kV D/C Rourkela – Raigarh 29.06.11

4 LILO of 400 kV D/C Bina-Nagda line at Sujalpur 29.05.11

5 400 kV D/C Limbdi(Chorania)(GEB)-

Ranchodpura(Vadavi)(GEB)

16.05.11

6 LILO of one circuit of 220KV Bina-Shivpuri at 765KV S/s

PGCIL, Bina

18.04.11

7 220kV D/C Bhat-Pirana line with AL-59 Cond. 11.05.11

8 220 kV LILO at Mota S/S from 2nd Ckt.of Ukai(T)-Vav line 14.04.11

9 220KV Ukai-Vav 09.04.11

10 400 kV D/C Korba- Raipur 21-06-11

11 400 kV D/C Mundra-Bachchau 29-09-11

12 400 kV D/C Bachchau- Ranchodpura 29-09-11

400 kV D/C Vadavi)GEB) -Kansari(GEB) 16.11.2011

13 400 kV D/C Wardha (PG)-Parli (PG)(Quad.) 31.07.2011

14 400 kV D/C Parli(MSEB)-Parli(PG) line 01.07.2011

15 220kV D/C Kosamba-Zagadia line 09.07.2011


21.3 Important EHV lines, which are expected to be commissioned during the current year 2011-12:

S.No. Line Implementing Agency

Anticipated target

1 400 kV D/C line from Bhusawal II to Aurangabad (Loc. No. 1 to 270)

Maharashtra Sep-11

2 400 kV D/C Mundra-Jetpur PGCIL March -12 3 400 kV D/C Gandhar-Navsari PGCIL March -12 4 400 kV D/C Navsari- Mumbai line(Boisar) PGCIL March-13 5 LILO of Lonikhand (MSEB)- Kalwa

(MSEB) 400 kV D/C at Pune (PG) Reliance (IPTC route)

March -12

6 LILO of 765 kV S/C Sipat-Seoni line at WR Pooling station near Sipat

PGCIL Feb'12

7 LILO of 765 kV S/C 2nd Sipat-Seoni line at WR Pooling station near Sipat at Bilaspur (Pooling Stn.)

PGCIL Feb'12

8 400 kV D/C Raipur(PG)-Wardha(PG) line PGCIL Mar. 12 9 400kV D/C Mauda STPS - Wardha line

(Quad) PGCIL Mar. 12

10 765 kV 2nd S/C Seoni - Wardha line PGCIL Mar. 12 11 400 kV D/C Korba (NTPC) – Birsingpur

(MPGENCO) PGCIL Mar. 12

The current status on above was updated in the meeting and MSETCL shall furnish details of transmission line status to WRPC subsequently. ITEM No. 22: ONGOING GENERATION SCHEMES IN WESTERN REGION The generating units expected to be commissioned during the current year 2011-12

and 2012-13 are as follows:

Name of the Power Projects Unit No.

Capacity (MW)

Schedule Date of Commissioning

GUJARAT (i) Ukai TPS Extn. 6 500 Oct -12 (ii) Pipavav CCPP- GPCL & GSPC JV Block-1 350 2012-13 Block-2 350 2012-13 (iii) Mundra Ultra Mega TPP (Tata Power Ltd.)

2 800 March-12

(iv) Hazira CCPP Expansion GSEG GT+ST 350 March-12 (vi) Pipavav TPP- Torrent Power 1000 2012-13 (vii) Bhavnagar Lignite TPP-JV 500 2012-13 MADHYA PRADESH


Name of the Power Projects Unit No.

Capacity (MW)

Schedule Date of Commissioning

(i) Satpura TPS Ext. 10 250 2012-13 (ii) Satpura TPS Ext. 11 250 2012-13 (iii) Maheshwar HEP 400 2011-12 ( iv) Malwa TPP 1 500 2012-13 MAHARASHTRA (iv) Bhusawal TPS 5 500 Dec-12 (v) Chandrapur TPS Extn 1 500 Jan-13 CENTRAL SECTOR – NTPC (i) Sipat-I, TPP 3 660 Feb-12 (ii) Mauda TPP 1 500 2011-12 (iii) Vindhyachal –V 500 March-12

The details of ongoing generation schemes in WR both under State as well as

Central Sector are enclosed at Annexure-22.

Following Generating units have been commissioned in Western Region during the year 2011-12:-

S.No. State /Agency

Name of Project Unit No.

Capacity in MW

Date of Commissioning

1 Gujarat 1 Mundra TPP Ph-2 2 660 20-07-11 Mundra TPP Ph-3 7 660 07-11-11 Mundra UMPP 1 800 08.01.12 2 Maharashtra 1 JSW Energy TPP 3 300 06-05-11 2 JSW Energy TPP 4 300 18-10-11 3 Wardha Warora TPP 4 135 30-04-11 4 Khaperkheda TPP Ext 5 500 05-08-11 3 Chhattisgarh ACB 1 135 13.12.11 S V Power Limited 1 63 07.12.11 4 NTPC 1 Sipat Stage-I 1 660 28-06-11 2 660 24.12.11 Total 4873

MAHAGENCO shall furnish details of generation and line status to WRPC subsequently.


ITEM No. 23: PERFORMANCE OF WR GRID DURING SEPTEMBER 2011 TO DECEMBER 2011

23.1 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Frequency: During months of September, October, November & December 2011, the grid

operated in the frequency range of 49.5 Hz to 50.2 Hz for 84.13 %, 75.65 %, 88.7%

and 82.72 % of time respectively. The frequency below 49.5 Hz were from 1.28% to

23.52 % of time during September to December 2011. In higher frequency regime,

system frequency remained above 50.20 Hz for 5.13 %, 0.80 %, 0.55 % and 0.76 %

of time respectively in September, October, November & December 2011. The

monthly average frequency was 49.84 Hz in September 2011, 49.65 Hz in October

2011, 49.73 Hz in November 2011 and 49.70 Hz in December 2011.

The number of occasions when instantaneous frequency touched 48.8 Hz in

September & October were 5 & 217 occasions, whereas it was nil in November &

December 2011. The detail of frequency profile for the months of September to

December 2011 is placed at Annexure-23.1(a).

Advisory Messages:

Advisory messages type A, B and C was issued by WRLDC to WR constituents for

curtailing over drawal as below :

Message type /Constituent A B C Total GETCO September –2011 13 10 8 31 October -2011 9 7 3 19 November -2011 18 10 2 30 December -2011 22 14 3 39 MPPTCL September –2011 15 4 4 23 October -2011 27 15 9 51 November -2011 58 34 6 98 December -2011 29 28 4 61 CSPTCL September –2011 46 24 14 84 October -2011 24 15 3 42


Message type /Constituent A B C Total November -2011 13 11 3 27 December -2011 26 30 7 63 MSETCL September –2011 34 20 10 64 October -2011 32 23 16 71 November -2011 24 14 1 39 December -2011 15 7 1 23 DD September –2011 11 3 Nil 14 October -2011 2 2 1 5 November -2011 Nil Nil Nil Nil December -2011 1 1 1 3 DNH September –2011 11 4 Nil 15 October -2011 7 8 4 19 November -2011 Nil Nil Nil Nil December -2011 Nil Nil Nil Nil GOA September –2011 4 1 Nil 5 October -2011 Nil 3 Nil 3 November -2011 1 Nil Nil 1 December -2011 3 2 1 6

No regulatory measures were required to be taken.

Energy Exchanges: There were net inter-regional export of 1541.894 MUs, 946.78

MUs, -132.66 MUs and 657.95 MUs by WR against net export schedule of 1468.952

MUs, 766.472 MUs, -45.271 MUs and 353.454 MUs respectively in September,

October, November & December 2011. The instances of overdrawal and TTC

violation by neighbouring regions were taken up by WRLDC in real time. The

messages issued by WRLDC for curtailment of overdrawl/ TTC violation to other

regions

LINK NR ER TOTAL

No of O/D Messages

September –2011 23 23 46 October -2011 51 61 112 November -2011 11 12 23 December -2011 29 28 57


No of TTC Messages September –2011 5 4 9 October -2011 Nil Nil Nil November -2011 Nil Nil Nil December -2011 0 1 1

TTC MESSAGES issued to Regional Entities of WR during September, October, November & December - 2011:- CONSTITUENT GETCO MPPTCL MSETCL CSPTCL Goa LANCO NTPC TOTALNO.OF TTC MSGS

Sept –2011 4 3 4 5 NIL NIL 6 22 Oct -2011 NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL Nov -2011 3 3 2 1 NIL NIL NIL 9 Dec -2011 NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

Demand : The maximum unrestricted demand of Western Region was 41185 MW, 43409 MW,

43839 MW and 43737 MW in September, October, November & December 2011

respectively, as compared to 36023 MW, 40179 MW, 39589 and 41252 MW during

the same months last year respectively. The region faced capacity shortage in the

range of 6035 MW to 7475 MW (peak deficit of 13.90 to 17.09%) respectively during

these months. The per day energy requirement during September, October,

November & December 2011 was 701.22 MUs, 849.66 MUs, 918.96 MUs and

959.23 MUs respectively. The energy shortage was 55.26 MUs per day, 114.22 MUs

per day, 137.53 MUs per day and 137.8 MUs per day during these months. The

details of unrestricted peak demand, demand met and energy requirement and

availability are as furnished at Annexure-23.1 (b).

23.2 Voltage Profile 23.2 Overall voltage profile had been satisfactory during the period under review.

However, instances of low and high voltages beyond the IEGC specified operating

range were observed at some of the EHV sub-stations in the region. Minimum

voltage of 364 kV was noted on 11th November 2011 at 400 kV Jetpur substation.


Higher voltages in the range of 422 kV to 436kV were noted at Asoj, Kasor, Indore,

Dhule, Karad, Bhilai, Jetpur, Bina, Nagda, Itarsi, Khandwa and Gwalior substations.

To contain high voltages WRLDC resorted to opening of lightly loaded EHV lines on

certain days. The detail of voltages at important 400 kV and 765 kV sub-stations for

the months September 2011 to December 2011 is placed at Annexure- 23.2. In order

to control incidences of high voltages during low load periods, installation of reactors

at following locations as planned by various utilities is in the process as per following

schedule:

S. No. 400 kV Sub/st Size (MVAR Implementing Agency

Expected commissioning date

1. Khandwa 1x125 PGCIL Commissioned on 30th Sep. 2010 2. Dhule 2x50 MSETCL 1x50 MVAr is already commissioned.

2nd reactor is commissioned on 11th 2010.

3. Dehgam 1x125 PGCIL Commissioned on 29th October 2010

4. Kasor 1x125 GETCO Commissioned on 3rd May 2011 5 Soja 1x80 GETCO Commissioned on 30th April 2011 6 Rajgarh 1x125 PGCIL March 2012 7 Nagda 1x50

1x50 MPPTCL MPPTCL

Commissioned on 28th September 2011 Commissioned on 14th November 2011

The timely commissioning of the above reactor is likely to help in smoothening of

high voltage profile.

23.3 AUFLS Performance. The month-wise details relating to performance of AUFLS scheme in Western

Region during the period September 2011 to December 2011 in terms of quantum of

load relief obtained and number of occasions the UFR operated is at Annexure-23.3.

ITEM No. 24: ANTICIPATED POWER SUPPLY POSITION IN WESTERN

REGION FOR THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 2012 TO APRIL 2012

The anticipated power supply position in the region for the period from January 2012

to April 2012 is at Annexure-24. The period under consideration consist of winter

season and beginning of summer season. The demand during the month of January

& February will be less and will start increasing from March 2012. The anticipated

regional demand is likely to vary between 41740 MW to 42300 MW and the capacity


shortage will around 10.50 %. In terms of energy, the unrestricted requirement is

expected to range from 26580 MUs to 28400 MUs with regional energy deficit of the

order of 6.5 % to 10.0 %. The anticipated Peak demand shortage of 130 to 750 MW

in Gujarat, 200 to 350 MW in Chhattisgarh, 4660 to 5025 MW in Maharashtra, 840 to

1050 MW in Madhya Pradesh, 20 to 40 MW in Goa, 10 to 30 MW in DD & 20 MW to

40 MW in DNH is likely to prevail.

WRP Committee noted as above. ITEM No. 25: OTHER OPERATIONAL ITEMS: 25.1.1 Capacity Building Proposals using REC Funds WRLDC proposed following capacity building proposals using REC funds:

(A) Workshops on Subjects of Contemporary Importance In 430th OCCM, WRLDC stated that there is a need to provide awareness in the

subjects of contemporary importance to engineers of power system utilities of

constituents of WR was discussed and the same can be accomplished through

funding from REC pool fund. It was therefore proposed to conduct workshops in the

following manner:

a) It is proposed to conduct five workshops (in constituent States) and one at

Mumbai. WRLDC vide letter no WRLDC/OS/1517/12 dated 23.01.12

intimated that as per present costing the approximate budget would be about

7.5 lakhs per workshop and total cost will be around 45 lakhs. The broad

subject titles were identified for coverage in the proposed workshops:

i) FGMO

ii) Connectivity & other regulations

iii) POC

iv) Security & reliability

v) Renewable


vi) Interregional TTC/ATC & congestion management

vii) Smart Grid

viii) Demand side management

ix) Workshop on reliability coordination at Mumbai

x) System Studies

xi) Protection Aspects

xii) WAMS

(B) Workshops on Black Start and recovery Procedure: In the 430th OCC meeting, Black Start of Power systems was discussed. With

the rapid expansion of the New Grid in terms of capacity and network addition, it

is essential that available blackstart and restoration facilities be reviewed

periodically and restoration procedures updated in consultation with beneficiary

constituents and generators and transmission licensees.

Further conducting workshops on Restoration procedures and Black start

facilities with an objective of regular review of the procedure and familiarization

for SLDC operators, generators and other licensees is one of the functions to be

discharged by RLDCs and also mandated in IEGC.

The OCC proposed to conduct eight workshops in the constituent states and

one each for NTPC, ISP, SSP & WRPC/WRLDC. WRLDC vide letter no

WRLDC/OS/1517/12 dated 23.01.12 have intimated that the present cost for

each workshop is estimated as Rs. 2 lakhs and the total cost will be around

Rs.16 lakhs (based on similar workshops conducted in ER & other regions)

The committee discussed and recommended that the above workshops can be

conducted for the benefit of the system engineers and funding may be met from

REC Pool fund and the same may be put up to WR Power Committee for

approval.

In TCC meeting the above proposals were discussed and TCC recommended the same. WRP Committee approved as per the TCC recommendations above.


(C) Status of REC pool account

WRLDC intimated vide letter no WRLDC/OS/1517/12 dated 23.01.12, the REC pool

status as on 20th Jan 2012 is enclosed at Annexure-25.1.1(C). As per the status total

payable to the pool account by entities like MPPTCL, GOA, D&D and DNH amounts

to Rs. 1.82Crs. Total receivable from the pool by CSPDCL, GECTCO and MSEDCL

is Rs.1.37Crs. If the payable entities pay the amount to pool account, the REC pool

account will have a net balance of Rs. 45 lakhs. It is requested that all the entities

who are payable to REC pool account may take necessary action in this regard so

that the surplus funds can be utilized as mentioned above.

As per clause 4.C of the Hon’ble CERC’s order dated 27th Sep 2010, in the matter

of “utilization of RLDC Reactive Energy Charge component of PSDF for the purpose

of Capacity building”

Quote:

Capacity building proposals in a region up to a limit of Rs.2 Crs. Per year or 30% of

the outstanding balance as at the beginning of the financial year, whichever is less

will require only approval of respective RPC and the proposals beyond this limit will

require approval of commission through PSDF managing committee.”

Unquote

Rs. 60 lakh from REC Pool A/C (30% of Rs.200 lakh balance available in 2010-

2011) was transferred to PSDF in March 2011 as approved programme was not

available at that time. Since it is the balance in the REC Pool A/C after settling the

payments, it has been suggested by WRLDC that a request can be made to the

PSDF Management Committee to make funds available in the REC in view of the

WRPC approved program. Expenditure Rs. 15 lakhs can be further utilized for

conducting capacity building with the approval of WRPC upto Rs.15 lakhs in FY

2012-13 in case payment made by the payable constituents.

Accordingly, WRLDC have requested that in-principle approval of the WR Power

Committee for the above workshops may be accorded so that funds for both the

years can be utilized for capacity building exercises.


In the TCC meeting, the Committee noted the above and recommended the proposal

of WRLDC and suggested that the same may be implemented when the funds are

available with WRLDC in the REC fund on permissible limit.

WRP Committee discussed and approved as per the recommendations of TCC above. 25.1.2 Utilization of PSDF funds for WR project. WRLDC, vide letter WRLDC/OS/1517/12 dated 23.01.12, have proposed the

following two schemes in Western Region to be funded from PSDF .

1. Voltage collapse prediction Relay.: With growing size and complexity of

the grid, stability aspects of integrated grid are of utmost importance. The

issue of voltage collapse prediction relay as a technological innovation is of

utmost importance to initiate actions and to understand the inherent

instabilities in the network. ERPC also approved ten such relays for funding

through PSDF.

A brief description of necessity of these relays is enclosed at Annex-25.1.2.

The approximate cost of each relay works out to be Rs.5Lakhs. WRLDC

proposed to install 10 such relays at strategic locations in WR. The total

estimated cost is worked out to Rs.50 Lakhs.

WRPC may also approve for deploying these relays in Western Region so

that WRLDC can take up with PSDF for funding.

It may also be mentioned that the above proposal was taken up in 107th PCM

of WRPC and PCM of WRPC also approved the above for installing in WR

through PSDF Fund.

TCC recommended the above for procurement under PSDF. WRP Committee approved the recommendation of TCC.

2. Video conference/calling facilities: The requirement of interaction among

SLDCs and RLDC and NLDC has increased multifold and many a times, the

meetings are not possible due to paucity of time and travels are not feasible.

This could easily be handled by installation of Video Conferencing facilities.


Already WRLDC and NLDC are using these facilities extensively for closer

interaction and the facilities are found to be effective. Similar systems are

proposed across RLDC- SLDCs and WRPC. This scheme involves

procurement of VC equipment at control centres and 2MBPS links across

WRLDC & SLDCs. The funds requirement of Rs. 9 lacs per site totaling to 45

lacs for the VC equipment. The links of 2MBPS between WRLDC and SLDCs

and WRPC would be availed from Powergrid Telecom at an approximate rate

of Rs.2,12,500/- per link per annum. Thus the total funds requirements would

be 45lacs for equipment and O&M costs would be typically 15% i.e. around

7.5 lacs. The links would be at around 15 lacs per annum. Thus the total

budget requirement would be 45 lacs one-time and 22 lacs annual recurring

initially and after the commissioning of Master Communication Plan in WR,

the links costs would be included in the O&M expenses of Master

Communication network.

Accordingly, WRLDC needs in-principle approval of the WR Power Committee for

the above locations so that the complete proposal along with cost estimation could

be forwarded to Managing Committee of PSDF.

TCC recommended the above for procurement under PSDF. WRP Committee approved the recommendation of TCC. 25.2 Reactive capability testing of generators Generator reactive capability is a necessity for maintaining system voltage and

providing appropriate dynamic reserves for ensuring reliability of service. Since this

reactive capability of generators requires testing & validation in a uniform manner, it

was proposed by WRLDC in 429th OCCM of WRPC to all WR constituents / utilities,

to furnish a comprehensive program for reactive capability testing of their generating

units. All generators connected to 400 KV grid are encouraged to carry out reactive

capability testing – at least three in a month based on the schedule approved by

OCM. A write up on Reactive capability testing of generators was circulated to OCC

members.


During the OCC the members discussed and initially the following generators

(preferably connected to 400 kV or catering to reactive power loads) were proposed

for Reactive Capability Testing:

NTPC: One 210 MW and /or one 500 MW unit at VSTPS

MPPTCL: SGTPC 500 MW unit

MSPGCL: SE(LD) stated that they shall furnish one location in discussion with

MSPGCL

CSPGCL: Korba(W) one unit

GETCO: Shall discuss the issue and inform WRPC.

In the TCC meeting the Committee noted as above. Further in the TCC meeting

WRLDC Intimated that during testing of reactive power capability of the generators,

schedule of generation would be taken as actual injection.

WRPC Committee concurred to above. 25.3 Automatic Under frequency relay operation: In the 429th OCC the operation of AULFS on 10.10.2011 when frequency touched

48.6 Hz , the second stage of defense, was discussed. It is to be noted that the relief

obtained was not adequate. Defense mechanism is expected to provide grid security

and ensure load relief to commensurate with fall of frequency as recommended

under UFLS scheme in Western Region which envisages a total relief of 960 MW at

frequency of 48.8 Hz and 48.6 Hz. Although the Committee noted about the quantum

of Load relief obtained from various constituent states but frequency response did

not pick up as expected.

The Committee felt that as the frequency improvement response is dependent upon

the successful operation of AUFLS relays in the entire NEW grid and the quantum of

load relief obtained from AUFLS relays in other parts of NEW grid during the above

instances also requires to be known so as to ascertain precisely the effectiveness in

frequency improvement and that review of the settings of AUFLS for NEW grid

requires to be done in a uniform manner, as since the last review the pattern of inter-

regional power flow has now changed under the current power scenario. It was

requested that the WR constituents would however ensure that load relief earmarked


to them in different stages of under frequency conditions for Western regional part

takes place in the full quantum. The SLDCs were also requested to look into the

instances whenever full quantum of relief ear-marked for their system could not take

place and analyse the reasons so as to take immediate corrective measures to

achieve expected load relief through AUFLS at any instance of time and would revert

back on the corrective steps taken by them in this regard.

In view of above it is felt by all members of the Committee that it is absolutely

essential that the required load relief through defense mechanism requires to be

ensured so that it is possible to maintain security of the interconnected NEW grid at

all times.

WRPC Committee noted as above. 25.4 Annual Load Generation Balance for the year 2012-13

A meeting of LGBR group was held on 30th November, 2011 at WRPC, Mumbai. The

group finalized the tentative outage Programme of major thermal units for the Year

2012-13. The same was sent to CEA for finalizing annual generating target for the Year

2012-13 & uploaded at WRPC website.

A meeting in finalizing the generation target in respect of various generating units

including IPPs for the year 2012-13 was organized by CEA on 11.01.2012. It was

requested that IPPs expected to commence delivering of power in WR grid during year

2012-13 may furnish month wise generation for intimation to CEA for further needful.

Regarding the Annual LGBR for 2012-13 based on data received so far WRPC,

preparation of draft Annual LGBR is under progress.

Chairman, WRPC suggested the while working out anticipated demand/requirement

the factors affecting climatic changes anticipated during the period may also be

considered for working out more accurate forecast picture of the demand.

WRPC Committee noted as above.


26: PROCEDURE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF MECHANISM OF RENEWABLE

REGULATORY FUND: In the 18th WRPC Meeting, it was intimated that matter regarding procedural action

plan for implementation of the mechanism of Renewable Regulatory Fund (RRF)

State SLDCs were requested by WRLDC for seeking necessary information / data

concerning wind farms/solar plants in their states in the required formats. As per the

order, the RRF procedure is to be implemented w.e.f. 1st Jan’ 2012, and directed

NLDC to arrange for mock exercise as per detailed procedure w.e.f. 1st July 2011. As

per the said order the action plan to be taken at SLDC level are as follows:

1. As per clause 2.1 (a)/(b) wind farms with capacity 10MW & above and

connected to 33kV level & above and solar generating plants with capacity 5

MW and above and connected to 33 kV level & above required to submit the

declaration to concerned State Load Despatch Centre (SLDC) which in turn

would submit the same to the concerned Regional Load Despatch Centre

(RLDC), Regional Power Committee (RPC) and National Load Despatch

Centre (NLDC), regarding whether they are connected to the transmission or

distribution system, and have not signed any PPA with states / UTs / DVC or

others as on 3rd May 2010.

2. As per clause 3.2, wind farms / Solar energy generators, which are intra state

entities shall furnish the details of contracts along with contracted price to the

concerned SLDC which in turn would submit the same to RPC/RLDC.

3. As per clause 3.3, Special Energy meters (SEMs) shall be installed by State

Transmission Utility (STU) for and at the cost of intra state entities.

4. As per clause 3.6, the concerned SLDC will be responsible for checking that

there is no gaming done by the renewable generators in order to make an

undue commercial gain.

5. As per clause 8.2 SLDCs of the state / UTs / DVC, in which the wind farm /

solar generator is located shall provide the 15 minute block wise data of

schedule and actual generation from wind farm / solar generation as recorded

in the SEMs to the concerned RLDC and NLDC on weekly basis.


6. As per Clause 6.5.23 of IEGC, forecasting data for wind and solar generation

is to be furnished to the concerned SLDC / RLDC and RPC. SLDCs are

requested to arrange for the same to facilitate the above mock exercise.

7. The SLDCs were requested to identify a nodal officer for their organization for

coordinating on the above matters.

8. The relevant formats to be filled at SLDC end were provided which also form

part of the above order.

WR Power Committee in the 18th WRPC meeting had noted as above and requested

that States wherever wind farms/ solar plants are located to make the required details

concerning these plants available as detailed above to SLDC/NLDC/RLDC/RPC in the

specified formats.

WRLDC had informed that they had organized the workshop on the subject on

14.10.2011 at WRPC office wherein the issues such as installation of SEMs, wind

forecasting, methodology of scheduling etc. would be clarified.

The workshop organized by NLDC was held on 14.10.2011 at WRPC office in Mumbai

which was attended by the State utilities of Western Region, and wind and solar

generator utilities wherein the mechanism for RRF operation was presented in detail in

the workshop and queries on various points were clarified therein by the NLDC.

As RRF mechanism is scheduled to be implemented for wind and solar generators

w.e.f 1.1.2012, it was essential to discuss the matter of implementation of RRF

mechanism as per the procedure directed vide CERC order for solar and wind

generators and proceed with region as a whole. In this regard a meeting-cum-

workshop on implementation of RRF mechanism was organized by NLDC on

13.01.2012. The State utilities and other utilities having solar and wind generators

eligible for being included under RRF had therein been requested to furnish

necessary details of PPAs signed, metering details, SEMs data, details of contracts

and status on provision of necessary DAS facility and forecasting tools. In Western

Region, States of Gujarat, MP and Maharashtra intimated about having tied up

capacity under RRF for solar and wind generation as follows:


Gujarat: Solar 150 MW, Wind 975 MW,

Madhya Pradesh: Wind 83.4 MW and

Maharashtra : Wind 45 MW.

The utilities were requested to fulfill other requirements indicated above and furnish

necessary data on contract details, schedule and actual generation to SLDC, NLDC,

RLDC / RPC for commencing the mock exercise and implementation of RRF

mechanism as per the procedure for RRF mechanism. In the TCC meeting, WRLDC representative said that RRF is to cover all eligible

solar and wind generators which do not have any PPAs signed as on cut-off date

(3.5.2010). To a query by WRLDC, Goa, DD&DNH intimated that there is no wind or

solar generators in their systems.

WRPC Committee noted as above. ITEM NO. 27. TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROPOSALS DISCUSSED AND AGREED IN THE 33RD STANDING COMMITTEE MEETING ON POWER SYSTEM PLANNING FOR WESTERN REGION HELD ON 21.10.2011 AND AGENDA POINTS BY PGCIL.

A) Proposal of UT of Dadra and Nagar Haveli for establishment of 220/66 kV 2X160 MVA Vagchipa.

UT of DNH has proposed to establish a 220/66 kV, 2X160 MVA Vagchipa /

Dadra substation by LILO of both circuit of 220 kV Vapi-Khadoli D/C line. Since 220

kV Vapi- Khadoli D/C line is an inter-state transmission line, DNH has requested the

concurrence of the WR constituents. DNH has informed that by 2013-14 the

anticipated load at Vagchipa / Dadra would be around 200MW as a lot of industrial

growth is taking place in that area. After deliberation, the proposal of DNH was

agreed and is to be implemented by DNH.

WRPC Committee noted as above. B) Proposal for establishment of GIS substations at Betul and Vataman


The establishment of 2X315 MVA, 400/220kV substation at Betul was agreed as a

part of transmission system of Mauda Stage-II (1320 MW) and it was also agreed

that in case of difficulty in getting land for substation at Betul, POWERGRID may

implement this substation as GIS. Similarly establishment of 2 X 500MVA,

400/220kV substation at Vataman was agreed as a part of transmission system

associated with 3960 (6X660) MW Chhattisgarh UMPP. PGCIL had intimated that

while exploring the land for establishment of Vataman and Betul 400 kV substation,

they found that only 12 – 15 acre of Govt. land was available as against the

requirement of about 30- 40 acres for setting 400 kV AIS. Further, in view of

requirement of large piece of private land, its acquisition problem and high cost of

land, POWERGRID have proposed that 400/220kV substation at Betul as well as

Vataman may be developed as GIS. After further deliberation, the members agreed

for establishing 400/220kV substations at Betul and Vataman as GIS as a part of

Mauda-II and Chhattisgarh UMPP transmission system respectively.

WRPC Committee noted as above. C) Interconnection of Vindhyachal Stage –IV (2X500 MW) generation project with existing stage-III switchyard In the 32nd meeting of Standing Committee of WR, an interim arrangement for

evacuation of power from Vindhyachal-IV (2X500MW) generation project was agreed

due to non availability of associated transmission system in the matching time frame

of Vindhyachal-IV generation project. The interim arrangement involves bunching of

Vindhyachal Pooling Station-Sasan 400 kV D/C line and interconnecting it with

Vindhyachal-IV at one end, bypassing Vindhyachal Pooling Station and

interconnecting with Sasan at the other end. The interim arrangement would utilize

the transmission system associated with Sasan UMPP from Sasan onwards. The

interim arrangement would have provided only one outlet from Vindhyachal-IV and in

the event of outage of the interim arrangement the power from Vindhyachal-IV would

have bottled up. Therefore, in the previous meeting, it was decided to study the

interconnection of Vindhyachal-IV with Vindhyachal-III to improve the reliability of

power evacuation from Vindhyachal-IV.

The system studies carried out after interconnecting Vindhyachal-IV with

Vindhyachal-III indicate normal loading in the event of outage of the interim


arrangement. However, the event of double contingency i.e. non-availability of

interim arrangement and outage of one of the circuit of Vindhyachal-Satna 400 kV

D/C line may cause overloading of other lines. In that case M/s NTPC shall have to

back down generation from Vindhyachal-IV as per the instruction from regional load

dispatch centre.

POWERGRID stated that for charging Satna-Bina 765 kV S/C line at 400 kV voltage

level, 125 MVAR line reactor would be required at Bina and the same would be

arranged from other location. It was also informed that charging of Sasan-Satna-

Bina 765kV line shall be at 400kV level as an interim arrangement. The Bina-Gwalior

765 kV lines shall also remain charged at 400kV level.

NTPC representative intimated that the interconnection of Vindhyachal-IV STPP 400

kV bus with the existing Vindhyachal-III STPP 400 kV bus would be implemented by

them through a 400 kV D/C line of about 4 km length.

After further deliberations, the interconnection of Vindhyachal-IV STPP 400 kV bus

with the existing Vindhyachal-III STPP 400 kV along with 1x125 MVAR reactor at

Bina end was agreed as an interim arrangement was agreed till the commissioning

of Vindhyachal-IV transmission system.

NTPC during WRPC meeting stated that Standing Committee decision that “M/s

NTPC shall have to back down generation from Vindhyachal-IV as per the instruction

from regional load dispatch Centre for the interim –arrangement” was not agreeable

by NTPC.

In the WRPC meeting, the Committee observed that the Standing Committee

members also include NTPC representation and had taken decision during

discussion therein and suggested that matter may therefore be presented by NTPC,

in this regard in the next Standing Committee.

D) Interim arrangement for charging of 765kV Bina - Indore(PG) S/c line at 400kV level along with 400kV Indore(PG) – Indore(MPPTCL) D/c line as part of Regional System strengthening in WR for Sasan UMPP


The following transmission system has been agreed as part of Regional System

strengthening in WR for Sasan UMPP and the same is being implemented by

Powergrid:

(i) Bina(PG)-Indore 765 kV S/c.

(ii) New 765/400 kV, 2x1500 MVA S/s at Indore

(iii) Indore(PG)-Indore 400 kV D/c (quad)

(iv) Upgrading Bina and Gwalior S/s to 765 kV: 2x1000 MVA 765/400 kV at Bina and

2x1500 MVA 765/400 kV at Gwalior.

POWERGRID has informed that the Bina – Indore (PG) 765kV S/C and Indore (PG)

- Indore (MPPTCL) 400kV D/C lines would be ready for commissioning by

Nov’11/Dec’11, whereas commissioning of 765kV Indore (PG) substation would be

delayed. POWERGRID has proposed the following interim arrangement to facilitate

transfer of power to Madhya Pradesh :

(i) Charging of 765kV Bina – Indore (PG) S/c line at 400kV level with direct

termination at Indore (MPPTCL) by bypassing Indore (PG) through the 400kV Indore

(PG) – Indore (MPPTCL) D/c line.

(ii) Interconnection of the Bina - Indore(PG) 765 kV S/c line charged at 400kV level

at Bina end by using 420 kV, 63 MVAR bus reactor bay at Bina and using the bus

reactor as line reactor.

(iii) Provision of one 400kV, 80MVAR / 125MVAR line reactor (to be arranged

suitably) at Indore (MPPTCL) end to facilitate smooth charging of the line.

Implementation of the above interim arrangement as well as termination of 765kV

line at 400kV bus at Bina along with bypassing at Indore(PG), requires installation of

400kV CVTs for the reactor terminal at Bina S/s and other equipments including line

reactor at Indore (MPPTCL) end.

MPPTCL representative stated that they are facing over voltage problem at Indore

and charging of this line may aggravate the over voltage problem especially during

light load condition the excessive voltage may cause damages to the equipments.

CEA representative stated that to contain the over voltages with in permissible limits,

operational measures such as switching off 400 kV lines, bringing in bus reactors

into service etc, were being resorted and to mitigate over voltage problem, adequate

reactive compensation is also being planned.


POWERGRID stated that for dispersal of power beyond Bina, charging of Bina –

Indore 765 kV line at 400 kV level would be through a 63 MVAR line reactor at Bina

end and a 125 MVAR line reactor at Indore (MPPTCL) end.

After further deliberations, members agreed to the above proposal.


E) MPPTCL proposal of LILO of one ckt. of Khandwa – Rajgarh 400 kV D/C line at their proposed 400kV Chhegaon substation. The LILO of one circuit of Khandwa-Rajgarh 400 kV D/c line at proposed 400kV

Chhegaon substation of MPPTCL was agreed in principle in the 32nd meeting of

Standing Committee of Power System Planning in WR, for improving the reliability of

evacuation of power from Malwa TPS. It was also agreed that the proposal would be

confirmed after joint study by CEA, PGCIL and MPPTCL. Subsequently, Load flow

studies were carried out in the time frame of 2012-13 considering following

transmission system associated with Malwa TPS (1200 MW):

(i) Malwa TPS - Pithampur 400kV D/c line.

(ii) Malwa TPS - Julwania 400kV D/c one ckt via Chhegaon

(iii) Malwa TPS - Chhegaon 220 kV D/C line.

(iv) Pithampur400 – Pithampur 220 kV D/C interconnector.

(v) LILO of both ckt of Nimrani- Julwania 220 kV D/C line at Julwania 400 kV

substation.

(vi) 1X315 MVA, 400/220 kV substation at Chhegaon, 2X315 MVA, 400/220 kV

substation

at Julwania and 2X315 MVA, 400/220 kV substation at Pithampur, 2X315 MVA,

400/220 kV transformer at Malwa generation switchyard. The studies indicate normal

loading on the lines.

After deliberations, the proposal of MPPTCL of LILO of one ckt. of Khandwa –

Rajgarh 400 kV D/C line at proposed 400kV Chhegaon (MPPTCL) substation was

agreed along with provision of 125 MVAR bus reactor at Chhegaon by MPPTCL.


F) CSPTCL proposal of LILO of 400kV S/c line between Raipur (PG) and Khedamera (Bhilai) S/c at proposed Raipur (Raita) 400kV substation.


CSPTCL proposal of LILO of 400kV Raipur – Khedamera line at their proposed

Raipur (Raita) 400kV substation was discussed in the 32nd meeting of Standing

Committee of Power System Planning in WR to improve the reliability of evacuation

of power from Marwa (2x500 MW) TPS. It was decided in the meeting that studies

would be carried out considering additional transmission elements planned by

CSPTCL from Raita sub-station. System studies had been carried out by

POWERGRID considering following transmission elements for evacuation of power

from Marwa (2X500 MW) TPS for 2012-13 time frame:

(i) Marwa STPP- Raita (Raipur) 400kV D/c

(ii) Raita – Jagdalpur 400 kV D/c

(iii) Raita – Khedemara(Bhilai) 400 kV D/c

(iv) LILO of 400kV Korba(W)- Khedamara one ckt at Marwa

(v) Marwa – Baneri 220kV D/c line

(vi) 400/220kV, 1x315 MVA transformer at Marwa generation switchyard

(vii) Establishment of 400/220 kV, 2x315 MVA S/s at Raita, Jagdalpur

The studies carried out indicate normal loading on 400 kV lines.

After deliberations, the proposal of CSPTCL was agreed along provision of 125

MVAR bus reactor at Raita and switchable line reactors in both circuits of Raita –

Jagdalpur 400 kV D/C line at Jagdalpur end by CSPTCL.


G) Provision of 1x315 MVA ICT for reliable auxiliary power supply at HVDC back to- back station at Bhadrawati. POWERGRID has informed that at present the auxiliary power supply to the HVDC

back-to-back station at Bhadrawati was fed through two number 33 kV dedicated

feeders of MSEDCL (one from 220 kV Warora Sub-station and the other from 220 kV

MIDC Sub-station). However frequent tripping of 33 kV feeders and poor quality of

power supply from MSEDCL has been affecting smooth operation of HVDC Back-to-

Back Station. For reliable auxiliary power supply at Bhadrawati, POWRGRID has

proposed provision of 1x315 MVA ICT (along with 220kV line bays) at Bhadrawati.

The tertiary of the 315 MVA ICT would be utilized for supply of reliable auxiliary

power supply to HVDC back-to-back station at Bhadrawati and the two nos. of 220

kV line bays could be utilized by MSETCL for drawl of power.


MSETCL representative stated they have taken up the issue with MSEDCL for

provision of reliable power supply to Bhadrawati HVDC back to back station.

Member (Power System), CEA stated that the issue can be discussed afresh in the

standing committee and subsequently can be taken up in the WRPC meeting.

The issue was further deliberated and keeping in view high utilization factor HVDC

back-to back station at Bhadrawati and large no. of instances of auxiliary power

supply failures, provision of 1x315 MVA ICT along with 2 nos. 220kV line bays for

reliable auxiliary power supply at HVDC back-to-back station at Bhadrawati was

agreed by the members.

It was also agreed that in case of space constraint, GIS shall be considered for 400

kV & 220kV bays. Further proposal being strengthening of existing system, it was

agreed that scheme shall be implemented by POWERGRID as system strengthening

scheme.


H) Provision of Line Reactor at Solapur (PG) for 400kV Solapur (PG) - Karad S/c line. 2x315MVA, 400/220kV Solapur (PG) S/s has been established through LILO of

Solapur (MSETCL)–Karad (MSETCL) 400kV S/c line as a part of WR System

strengthening scheme-II. After establishment of LILO, the length of 400kV Karad

(MSETCL) – Solapur (PG) & Solapur (PG) – Solapur (MSETCL) section has

increased to about 300km and 178km respectively. In view of the increased length of

400kV Solapur (PG)-Karad section, POWERGRID has proposed provision of

1x80MVAR switchable line reactor at Solapur (PG) end for Solapur(PG)-Karad

400kV line as a regional system strengthening scheme.

The proposal was agreed by the members for implementation by POWERGRID as

system strengthening scheme.


I) Provision of additional spare converter transformers for HVDC back to back station at Chandrapur (Bhadrawati).


POWERGRID representative informed that Pole-I of HVDC Back-to-Back (BTB)

station (2x500MW) at Bhadrawati was commissioned in Oct. 97 and Pole-II in March

98. The Bhadrawati BTB was planned for exchange of power between WR and SR

during contingency conditions. Recently the BTB is being used as power evacuation

corridor with utilization factor of more than 93 % during 2011. The high utilization of

the BTB and frequent change of power order causes enormous stress on converter

transformers due to frequent operation of on load tap changer. This has bearing on

the life of converter transformers. At present there are 12 no. converter transformers

(6 for each pole) and only one spare converter transformer is available at

Bhadrawati. Further, these converter transformers are off shore manufactured items.

Any multiple failures of converter transformers may result in long outage of the pole

and restrict the power transfer capability through this BTB to 500 MW. In view of

such high capacity utilization of HVDC BTB at Bhadrawati, it is proposed to have one

spare Converter Transformer for each pole at each regional bus i.e., total three nos.

of single phase converter transformers. The estimated cost of one single phase

Converter Transformers is Rs.12 Crores.

After further deliberations, members agreed to the proposal of providing one (1)

spare converter transformer for each pole at each WR and SR bus. As one spare

converter transformer is already provided, accordingly, it was decided that

POWERGRID shall implement provision of three (3) additional spare converter

transformers at HVDC BTB at Bhadrawati as system strengthening scheme.

WRPC Committee noted as above. J) High Voltage Studies of Western Region Grid.

During 33rd Standing Committee meeting on Power System Planning in Western

Region, provision of 125 MVAR (fixed) Reactors each at POWERGRID substations

at Jabalpur, Khandwa, Shujalpur, Bhatapara, Raigarh, Aurangabad and 125 MVAR

(fixed) reactors at GETCO substations of Ranchodpura, Varsana, Rajkot, and Amreli

sub-stations of POWERGRID was approved. The reactive compensation provision in

STU sub-stations would be implemented by respective STUs and in ISTS sub-

stations would be implemented by POWEGRID. Variable reactive compensation

150 MVAR at Parli(PG) and Pirana(PG) and SVC of +200/-150 MVAR at Indore(PG)

were proposed. It was also decided during the meeting that WRPC along with WR


constituents would carry out study to assess the additional reactive compensation

including sizing of dynamic compensation required for which POWERGRID would

furnish the required load flow data.

In the TCC meeting, based on real-time observations WRLDC proposed additional

locations for consideration by the Standing Committee at Akola, Wardha, Bhadravati,

Raipur as there is frequent prevalence of high voltage profile at the above

substations. TCC suggested that the above observation may be examined by the

Standing Committee of CEA on PSP about the additional requirement.

WRPC Committee concurred to as above.

K) Hindustan Electricity Generation Company Pvt. Ltd. (HEGCPL) PGCIL vide letter No. C/OS/WRPC-19th/ dated 19.1.2012 requested to include

following in the agenda to discuss:

M/s Hindustan Electricity Generation Company Pvt. Ltd (HEGCPL) had applied for

LTA of its 1137MW Gas based generation project (3x379MW) near Village/Town:

Navlakh – Umbre, Dist - Pune, in Maharashtra as per the CERC Regulations, 2009.

LTA was sought for 25 years from March’14. The target beneficiaries were indicated

as ER (700MW) and SR (300MW).

The application was discussed in the 15th WR Constituent Meeting regarding

Connectivity/Open Access application on 21st October, 2011. In view of the project

progress, LTA for only one unit of 379MW of the generation project was agreed with

target beneficiaries in SR/ER (SR-114MW, ER-265MW) with following system

strengthening.

(i) Transmission system strengthening in SR-WR tr. corridor (to be shared with IPPs in SR & WR) – to be implemented by POWERGRID

• Narendra (GIS) – Kolhapur (GIS) 765 kV D/c line (initially to be

operated at 400 kV) [subsequently to be upgraded at 765 kV]

• LILO of both circuits of existing Kolhapur – Mapusa 400 kV D/c line at

Kolhapur (new)

• Narendra (GIS) – Narendra (existing) 400 kV D/c Quad line


• Establishment of new 400 kV substation each at Narendra (GIS) and

Kolhapur (GIS) [to be upgraded to 765 kV later]

• Kolhapur – Padghe 765 kV D/c one circuit via Pune (initially to be

operated at 400 kV) [subsequently to be upgraded at 765 kV]

PGCIL vide above letter have intimated that now, M/s HEGCPL vide letter ref

HEGCPL/HO/PGCIL/LTA/11 dated 28 Nov, 2011 have requested to modify

beneficiary for full LTA quantum of 379MW power to ER, since they have

signed PPA with West Bengal. Accordingly, it is proposed to change the

beneficiaries for full quantum of LTA (379MW) to ER for M/s HEGCPL.

WRPC Committee noted as above. ITEM No. 28: MEMBERSHIP OF WRPC

28.1 Government of India, Ministry of Power under the provision of Section 2,

Subsection 55 of the Electricity Act 2003 vide its resolution F.No.23/1/2004-R&R

dated 25.05.2005 and subsequent amendments dated 29.11.2005 and 9th May 2008

published in the Gazette of India established the Western Regional Power

Committee in place of erstwhile Western Regional Electricity Board.

28.2 Accordingly, membership of State DISCOM having more than one Distribution

Companies, representation of Private DISCOM and representation of IPPs having

installed capacity of 1000 MW and below is due for rotation and for the year 2012-

2013 it will be as given below:

(i) Gujarat Uttar Gujarat Vij Vitaran Co. Ltd, Mehsana

(ii) Madhya Pradesh Pashim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. Ltd., Indore

(iii) Representative of GENCO having IC 1000 MW and less.

Jindal Power Ltd Tamnar, Raigarh.

(iv) One DISCOM out of private DISCOs in WR

Torrent Power AE Co. Ahmedabad

Regarding the member representation among Electricity Traders for the year 2012-

13 for Western Region, WRPC Sectt has requested CEA to intimate the same as


CEA nominates the name of traders on Regional basis. Upon receiving the

necessary details from the CEA, the electricity trader representation shall be

intimated.

28.3 Chairmanship of WRPC is due for rotation w.e.f. 01.04.2012 and CMDs of

Maharashtra State Power Companies would be Chairman of WRPC for the year

2012-13. CMDs of Maharashtra State Power Companies may decide membership

among them and intimate the nomination thereof for the Chairmanship of WRPC for

the year 2012-13 among the three state power companies of the Maharashtra State.

During meeting, it was intimated by MSETCL the formal communication will be made

at the earliest.

WRP Committee noted as above. ITEM No. 29: Establishment of National Power Committee: The Second meeting of NPC was held on 25.11.2012 at CEA, New Delhi. The

minutes and copy of the draft Conduct of Business Rules along with copy In the

meeting was circulated to the WR constituents vide letter No. WRPC/AS-CEA

Mtg/2011/11313 dated 15.12.2011 for comments. The minutes of meeting and draft

CBR(Conduct of Business Rule) of NPC discussed and finalized are also enclosed

at Annexure-29.1. In this regard, MPPTradco vide letter No. 05-01/86 dated

11.1.2012 (Copy at Annexure-29.2) received have proposed for consideration of

following for inclusion in the CBR of NPC i.e. the functions of NPC to include “ to

resolve interstate issue/disputes among the constituents of different RPCs.”

Comments received from Mahavitran vide letter dated CE/PP/NPC/3484 dated

8.2.2012 to modify sentences under Functions of NPC clause at followings:

• ii, iii & iv of CBR to add “ endeavor to arrive at consensus amongst to the

RPCs” after word “Discuss” and

• iv replace the word “beneficial to” by “affecting”

During WRP committee meeting NTPC, RLDC & CTU expressed that they would

also be included as Members of NPC. The Chairman, WRPC suggested that all the


Central Power Utilities may send their request to WRPC, which may put it up before

NPC for consideration.

WRP Committee noted as above. ITEM No. 30: ANY OTHER ITEM ITEM No. 31: DATE AND VENUE OF NEXT WRPC MEETING MD, MPPTCL intimated about their consent to host the TCC and 20th WRPC meeting by Madhya Pradesh in May 2012. Date and venue will be communicated separately.

*************

Annexure -1(a) œ¸®¸½¢¨¸¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸ ˆÅú ¢™›¸¸¿ˆÅ 10.02.2012 ˆÅ¸½ ›¸¨¸ì Ÿ¸º¿¤¸ƒÄ Ÿ¸½¿ ‚¸¡¸¸½¢�¸÷¸ 19 ¨¸ì

œ¸.®¸½.¢¨¸.¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸ ¤¸¾“ˆÅ Ÿ¸½¿ ž¸¸Š¸ ¥¸½›¸½ ¨¸¸¥¸½ ‚¢š¸ˆÅ¸¢£¡¸¸½¿ ˆÅú ¬¸»�¸ú

ˆÅ. œ¸¢©�¸Ÿ¸ ®¸½°¸ú¡¸ ¢¨¸Ô¸º÷¸ ¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸ ¬¸™¬¡¸

1. ªú ‚�¸¸Á¡¸ Ÿ¸½í÷¸¸, ‚š¡¸®¸, œ¸.®¸½.¢¨¸. ¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸ 2. ªú ˆ½Å.ˆ½Å. ‚ŠÏ¨¸¸¥¸, ¬¸™¬¡¸ (¢ŠÏ” œÏ�¸¸¥¸›¸ ‡¨¸¿ ¢¨¸÷¸£μ¸), ˆ½Å¢¨¸œÏ¸ 3. ªú �¸ú.‡¬¸ ˆÅ¥¸¬¸ú, ‚š¡¸®¸, ÷¸ˆ .¬¸Ÿ¸.¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸ 4. ªú ˆ½Å.‡¬¸. Ÿ¸›¸¸½¢“¡¸¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (ž¸¸.œÏ½.), Žî¸ú£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 5. ªú œ¸ú.‡. œ¸’½¥¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Š¸½’ˆÅ¸½ 6. ªú „Ÿ¸½©¸ £¸…÷¸�¸ú, œÏ¤¸¿š¸ ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ, Ÿ¸œÏ¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 7. ªú ‡.œ¸ú. ž ¾̧£¨ ½̧, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Ÿ¸œÏ¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 8. ªú ‚£¿¢¨ ¿̧™ ¢¬¸¿í, ‚š¡¸®¸ ‡¨¸¿ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ, Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 9. ªú ¢›¸Ÿ¸Ä¥¸ ¤ÏŠ¸¸¿�¸¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ¢¨¸Ô¸º÷¸‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Š¸¸½¨¸¸ ¢¨¸Ô¸º÷¸ ¢¨¸ž¸¸Š¸ 10. ªú ±¸¸›¸½©¸ ž¸¸£÷¸ú, ¬¸¢�¸¨¸, ™Ÿ¸›¸ ‡¨¸¿ ™ú¨¸ 11. ªú ‚©¸¸½ˆÅ ¬¸½“ú, „œ¸¸š¡¸®¸ 12. ªú œ¸¿ˆÅ�¸ ©¸¸í, ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (œÏ�¸¸¥¸›¸), ¬¸ú‡¥¸œ¸ú ƒ¿¢”¡¸¸ 13. ªú ¬¸¿�¸ú¨¸ Ÿ¸½í£¸, œÏ¤¸¿š¸ ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ, ’úœ¸ú’ú¬¸ú‡¥¸ 14. ªú Ÿ¸›¸�¸ú÷¸ ¢¬¸¿‹¸, ¬¸™¬¡¸ ¬¸¢�¸¨¸, œ¸®¸½¢¨¸¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸

‰¸. ‚›¡¸ I Žî¸ú¬¸Š¸�õ

1. ªú ‡¬¸.”ú. ¢™¨¸¸›¸, ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (‚¸½ ‡¿” ‡Ÿ¸), Žî¸ú£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 2. ªú �¸½.ˆÅ£, œÏ¤¸¿š¸ ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ, Žî¸ú£¸¢¨¸„÷œ¸¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 3. ªú ‡›¸.‡¬¸. £¸¨¸÷¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (‚¸½ ‡¿” ‡Ÿ¸/�¸ú), Žî¸ú£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 4. ªú ‚¸£.ˆ½Å. Ÿ¸½í÷¸¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (¬¸ú ‡¿” œ¸ú), Žî¸ú£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸.

II Š¸º�¸£¸÷¸ 1. ªú ‡¬¸. ¤¸ú. ‰¡¸¸¢¥¸¡¸¸, ˆÅ¸¡¸ÄˆÅ¸£ú ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (¢¨¸î¸), Š¸º�¸…�¸¸Ä¢¨¸¢›¸¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 2. ªú ”ú.�¸½. ©¸¸í, ‚¢÷¸.Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Š¸½’ˆÅ¸½ 3. ªú ‚¸£.ˆ½Å. œ¸’½¥¸, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, ™Š¸º�¸¢¨¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 4. ªú œ¸ú.� ½̧. �¸¸›¸ú, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Š¸º�¸…¢¨¸¢›¸¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸.

III Ÿ¸š¡¸ œÏ™½©¸ 1. ªú ¨¸ú. Ÿ¸½í÷¸¸½, ¬¸¥¸¸íˆÅ¸£, Ÿ¸œÏ¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 2. ªú œ¸ú.ˆ½Å. ¢¬¸¿í, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (¨¸¸.), Ÿ¸œÏ œ¸»®¸½¢¨¸¢¨¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 3. ªú œÏˆÅ¸©¸ �¸÷¸º¨øÄ™ú, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Ÿ¸œÏ¢¨¸„÷œ¸¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸.

-2-

IV Ÿ¸í¸£¸«’ï 1. ªú ¡¸».�¸ú.�¸¸¥’½, ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (œÏ�¸¸.), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 2. ªú ‡¬¸.ˆÅ½. ™ž¸¸”õ½, ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (œÏ�¸¸), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸¢¨¸÷¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 3. ªú ‡.�¸½. ™½©¸œ¸¸¿”½, ˆÅ¸¡¸¸ÄˆÅ¸£ú ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (¨¸¸¢μ¸�¡¸), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸¢¨¸÷¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 4. ªú œ¸ú.‚¸£.™½¨¸£½, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 5. ªú �¸ú. ‡Ÿ¸. œ¸�¸¸£½½, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸„÷œ¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 6. ªú ¬¸¿�¸¡¸ ’ú. ¢©¸¿™½, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (‡¬¸’ú¡¸»), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 7. ªú ‡.‡¬¸. �¸¸¾í¸›¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (¢¨¸.ÇÅ.), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸¢¨¸÷¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 8. ªú ¤¸ú.‚¸½. ¤¸¸Š¸”õö½, ‚š¸ú.‚¢ž¸., Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸„÷œ¸¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 9. ªú ‡›¸.‚¸£. ¬¸¸½›¸ˆÅ¨¸§½, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (‡¬¸’ú¡¸»), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 10. ªú ‡¬¸.�¸ú. œ¸º£ˆÅ£, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (‡¬¸’ú¡¸»), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 11. ªú ¨¸ú.”ú. œ¸¸¿”½, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (œÏ�¸¸.), ‡Ÿ¸‡¬¸‡¥¸”ú¬¸ú 12. ªú ‡.‚¸£.ˆ º¥¸ˆÅμ¸úÄ, ¬¸í¸¡¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸.

V ™Ÿ¸›¸ ‡¨¸¿ ™ú¨¸ 1. ªú ›¸£½›Í ˆºÅŸ¸¸£, œÏ©¸¸¬¸ˆÅ, ™Ÿ¸›¸ ™ú¨¸ ‡¨¸¿ ™¸™£¸ ›¸Š¸£ í¨¸½¥¸ú 2. ªú ‡Ÿ¸.‚¸£. ƒ¿Š¸¥¸½, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, ™Ÿ¸›¸ ‡¨¸¿ ™ú¨¸ 3. ªú ¬¸Ÿ¸ú£ œ¸¿”Ã¡¸¸, ˆÅ¢›¸«“ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸

VI ™¸™£¸ ‡¨¸¿ ›¸Š¸£ í¨¸½¥¸ú 1. ªú ‡�¸.‡Ÿ¸.œ¸’½¥¸, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ VII ‡›¸’úœ¸ú¬¸ú ¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸.

1. ªú ‡¬¸.¬¸ú. œ¸¸¿”½, ®¸½°¸ú¡¸ ˆÅ¸¡¸ÄˆÅ¸£ú ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ, œ¸®¸½-I 2. ªú ‡¬¸.‡›¸. Š¸¸¿Š¸º¥¸ú, ®¸½°¸ú¡¸ ˆÅ¸¡¸ÄˆÅ¸£ú ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ, œ¸®¸½-II 3. ªú ¨¸ú.ˆ½Å. œ¸¸š¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ 4. ªú ‚¸£.‡›¸.œ¸¸¿”½ (¨¸¸.), ‚¢÷¸.Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (¨¸¸.) 5. ªú œ¸ú.‡. œ¸¸¿”½, „œ¸ Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ(¨¸¸.) 6. ªú ‡.ˆÅ½. �¸¸¾š¸£ú, ¨¸¢£. œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (¨¸¸.)

VIII œ¸¸¨¸£¢ŠÏ” ˆÅ¸œ¸øÄ£½©¸›¸ ‚¸ÁûÅ ƒ¿¢”¡¸¸ ¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸.

1. ªú ‚¸£.ˆ½Å. ¢¬¸¿í, ˆÅ¸¡¸ÄˆÅ¸£ú ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ- œ¸®¸½-II 2. ªú ¨¸ú.ˆ½Å. ‰¸£½, Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ - œ¸®¸½-I 3. ªú ‚¸ƒÄ.‡›¸.�¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤ ¿̧š¸ˆÅ (‚¸½ ‡¿” ‡Ÿ¸), œ¸®¸½-II 4. ªú ˆÅŸ¸¥¸ ¬¸£ˆÅ¸£, ‚¢÷¸. Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (‚¸½ ‡¬¸), ˆ½Å›Íú¡¸ ˆÅ¸¡¸¸Ä. 5. ªú ‡.‡¬¸. ˆºÅ©¸¨¸¸í¸, ‚¢÷¸. Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (‡¥¸ ”ú ‡¿” ¬¸ú), ˆ½Å›Íú¡¸ ˆÅ¸¡¸¸Ä. 6. ¬¸ºªú Ÿ¸¿�¸º Š¸ºœ÷¸¸, „œ¸ Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (‡¬¸ƒÄ‡ûÅ), ˆ½Å›Íú¡¸ ˆÅ¸¡¸¸Ä. 7. ªú ‚¢ž¸›¸¨¸ ¨¸Ÿ¸¸Ä, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (ƒ¿�¸ú.)

-3-

IX œ¸¸¨¸£ ¢¬¸¬’Ÿ¸ ‚¸Áœ¸£½©¸›¸ ˆÅ¸œ¸øÄ£½©¸›¸ 1. ªú œ¸ú. œ¸ÿ’¾¡¡¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ

2. ªú ‡. Š¸¸£¢÷¸¡¸¸, „œ¸ Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ 3. ªú ¬¸ú.‡¬¸. ¤¸¸½¤¸”õ½, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (�¸ú‡Ÿ¸) 4. ¬¸ºªú ‡¬¸. …«¸¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ X ’¸’¸ œ¸¸¨¸£ ˆ¿Å.

1. ªú ¨¸ú.‚¸£. ªú‰¸¿”½, „œ¸ Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ 2. ªú ’ú.ˆ½Å. ž¸¸«ˆÅ£›¸, ¬¸í¸. Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ 3. ªú œÏˆÅ¸©¸ Š¸”¸¨¸½, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ, ’¸’¸ œ¸¸¨¸£ 4. ªú ¢ˆÅ£μ¸ ™½¬¸¸¥¸½, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ œÏ¤ ¿̧š¸ˆÅ, ’¸’¸ œ¸¸¨¸£

XI ‚¸£�¸úœ¸úœ¸ú‡¥¸ 1. ªú ¤¸ú.‡Ÿ¸. Š¸º¥¸¸’ú, „œ¸ Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (¨¸¸.) 2. ªú œÏ¨¸úμ¸ ¬¸Æ¬¸½›¸¸, „œ¸ Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ 3. ªú ‡.‡¬¸. œ¸¸¿”½, ¨¸¢£«“ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ

XII ‡›¸œ¸ú¬¸ú‚¸ƒÄ‡¥¸ 1. ªú ‚¸£.ˆ½Å. ‚¸½ˆ½Å, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (œ¸¸£½.)

XIII ›¸Ÿ¸Ä™¸ ¢›¸¡¸¿°¸μ¸ œÏ¸¢š¸ˆÅ£μ¸ 1. ªú ‡Ÿ¸.ˆ½Å. �¸½’¨¸¸¥¸, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (ƒÄ‡Ÿ¸¬¸ú) XIV ’¸½£ÿ’ œ¸¸¨¸£

1. ªú ‡Ÿ¸.‡�¸. ®¸°¸ú¡¸, Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ XV ’úœ¸ú’ú¬¸ú‡¥¸

1. ªú �¸½.”ú. ˆºÅ¥¸ˆÅμ¸úÄ, ¬¸ú ‚¸½ ‚¸½ XVI ˆ½Å›Íú¡¸ ¢¨¸Ô¸º÷¸ œÏ¸¢š¸ˆÅ£μ¸

1. ªú £¢¨¸›Í ˆºÅŸ¸¸£ ¨¸Ÿ¸¸Ä, ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ XVII „î¸£ œ¸»¨¸Ä ®¸½°¸ú¡¸ ¢¨¸Ô¸º÷¸ ¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸

1. ªú œ¸ú.”ú. ¢¬¸¨¸¸¥¸, ¬¸™¬¡¸ ¬¸¢�¸¨¸ XVIII œ¸®¸½¢¨¸¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸, Ÿ¸º¿¤¸ƒÄ

1. ªú ‚¸½.œÏ.¢¬¸¿í, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (¨¸¸.) 2. ªú ¬¸÷¡¸›¸¸£¸¡¸μ¸ ‡¬¸. ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (œÏ�¸¸.) 3. ªú ‡Ÿ¸.‡Ÿ¸. š¸ˆÅ¸÷¸½, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (£.) 4. ªú ‡¥¸.ˆ½Å. ‡¬¸ £¸“¸¾£, ¬¸í¸¡¸ˆÅ ¬¸¢�¸¨¸ 5. ªú ”ú.‡›¸. Š¸¨¸¸¥¸ú, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¥¸¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ 6. ªú œ¸ú.”ú. ¥¸¸½›¸½, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸

Annexure -1(b)

œ¸®¸½¢¨¸¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸ ˆÅú 19 ¨¸ì ÷¸ˆÅ.¬¸Ÿ¸.¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸ ˆÅú ¢™›¸¸¿ˆÅ 09.02.2012 ˆÅ¸½ ›¸¨¸ì Ÿ¸º¿¤¸ƒÄ Ÿ¸½¿ ‚¸¡¸¸½¢�¸÷¸ ¤¸¾“ˆÅ Ÿ¸½¿ ž¸¸Š¸ ¥¸½›¸½ ¨¸¸¥¸½ ‚¢š¸ˆÅ¸¢£¡¸¸½¿ ˆÅú ¬¸»�¸ú

ˆÅ. ÷¸ˆÅ›¸úˆÅú ¬¸Ÿ¸›¨¸¡¸ ¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸ ¬¸™¬¡¸

1. ªú �¸ú.‡¬¸. ˆÅ¥¸¬¸ú, œÏ¤¸¿š¸ ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ, Žî¸ú£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. ‡¨¸¿ ‚š¡¸®¸, ÷¸ˆÅ¬¸Ÿ¸¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸ 2. ªú ‡¬¸.”ú. ¢™¨¸¸›¸, ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (‚¸½ ‡¿” ‡Ÿ¸), Žî¸ú£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 3. ªú ‡›¸.‡¬¸. £¸¨¸÷¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (‚¸½ ‡¿” ‡Ÿ¸/�¸ú), Žî¸ú£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 4. ªú ˆ½Å.‡¬¸. Ÿ¸›¸¸½¢“¡¸¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (ž¸¸.œÏ½.), Žî¸ú£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 5. ªú œ¸ú.‡. œ¸’½¥¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Š¸½’ˆÅ¸½ 6. ªú ”ú.�¸½.©¸¸í, ‚¢÷¸.Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (‚¸£ ‡¿” ¬¸ú), Š¸½’ˆÅ¸½ 7. ªú „Ÿ¸½©¸ £¸…÷¸�¸ú, œÏ¤¸¿š¸ ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ, Ÿ¸œÏ¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 8. ªú œ¸ú.ˆ½Å. ¢¬¸¿í, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (¨¸¸.), Ÿ¸œÏ œ¸»®¸½¢¨¸¢¨¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 9. ªú ‡.œ¸ú. ž ¾̧£¨ ½̧, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Ÿ¸œÏ¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 10. ªú ‡¬¸.ˆÅ½. ™ž¸¸”õ½, ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (œÏ�¸¸), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸¢¨¸÷¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 11. ªú ¡¸».�¸ú.�¸¸¥’½, ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (œÏ�¸¸.), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 12. ªú ¢›¸Ÿ¸Ä¥¸ ¤ÏŠ¸¸¿�¸¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ¢¨¸Ô¸º÷¸‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Š¸¸½¨¸¸ ¢¨¸Ô¸º÷¸ ¢¨¸ž¸¸Š¸ 13. ªú ‡Ÿ¸.‚¸£. ƒ¿Š¸¥¸½, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, ™Ÿ¸›¸ ‡¨¸¿ ™ú¨¸ 14. ªú ”ú.ˆ½Å. ¨¸¸¥¸½�¸¸, ˆÅ¸¡¸ÄˆÅ¸£ú ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ, ”¤¥¡¸»‚¸£’ú‡¬¸-I 15. ªú ‡¬¸.¬¸ú. œ¸¸¿”½, ®¸½°¸ú¡¸ ˆÅ¸¡¸ÄˆÅ¸£ú ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (”¤¥¡¸»-I), ‡›¸’úœ¸ú¬¸ú ¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 16. ªú ‚¸£.ˆ½Å. ‚¸½ˆ½Å, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (œ¸¸£½.), ‡›¸œ¸ú¬¸ú‚¸ƒÄ‡¥¸ 17. ªú ‚ž¸¡¸ œ¸¸½÷¸™¸£, ¨¸¢£. „œ¸¸š¡¸®¸ (œÏ�¸¸.), �¸úœ¸úƒÄ¬¸ú ¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 18. ªú �¸½.”ú. ˆºÅ¥¸ˆÅμ¸úÄ, ¬¸ú ‚¸½ ‚¸½, ’úœ¸ú’ú¬¸ú‡¥¸ 19. ªú Ÿ¸›¸�¸ú÷¸ ¢¬¸¿‹¸, ¬¸™¬¡¸ ¬¸¢�¸¨¸, œ¸®¸½¢¨¸¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸

‰¸. ‚›¡¸ I Žî¸ú¬¸Š¸�õ 1. ªú ‚¸£.ˆ½Å. Ÿ¸½í÷¸¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (¬¸ú ‡¿” œ¸ú), Žî¸ú£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. II Š¸º�¸£¸÷¸

1. ªú ‚¸£.ˆ½Å. œ¸’½¥¸, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, ™Š¸º�¸¢¨¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 2. ªú œ¸ú.�¸½. �¸¸›¸ú, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Š¸º�¸…¢¨¸¢›¸¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸.

III Ÿ¸š¡¸ œÏ™½©¸ 1. ªú ¨¸ú. Ÿ¸½í÷¸¸½, ¬¸¥¸¸íˆÅ¸£, Ÿ¸œÏ¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 2. ªú œÏˆÅ¸©¸ �¸÷¸º¨øÄ™ú, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Ÿ¸œÏ¢¨¸„÷œ¸¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸.

-2-

IV Ÿ¸í¸£¸«’ï 1. ªú œ¸ú.‚¸£.™½¨¸£½, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 2. ªú ¬¸¿�¸¡¸ ’ú. ¢©¸¿™½, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (‡¬¸’ú¡¸»), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 3. ªú ‡.‡¬¸. �¸¸¾í¸›¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (¢¨¸.ÇÅ.), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸¢¨¸÷¸ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 4. ªú ‡›¸.‚¸£. ¬¸¸½›¸ˆÅ¨¸§½, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (‡¬¸’ú¡¸»), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 5. ªú ‡¬¸.�¸ú. œ¸º£ˆÅ£, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (‡¬¸’ú¡¸»), Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 6. ªú ¨¸ú.”ú. œ¸¸¿”½, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (œÏ�¸¸.), ‡Ÿ¸‡¬¸‡¥¸”ú¬¸ú 7. ªú ‡.‚¸£.ˆ º¥¸ˆÅμ¸úÄ, ¬¸í¸¡¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸£¸¢¨¸œ¸¸£½ˆ¿Å¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸.

V ™Ÿ¸›¸ ‡¨¸¿ ™ú¨¸ 1. ªú ¬¸Ÿ¸ú£ œ¸¿”Ã¡¸¸, ˆÅ¢›¸«“ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸

VI ™¸™£¸ ‡¨¸¿ ›¸Š¸£ í¨¸½¥¸ú 1. ªú ‡�¸.‡Ÿ¸.œ¸’½¥¸, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ VII ‡›¸’úœ¸ú¬¸ú ¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 1. ªú ¨¸ú.ˆ½Å. œ¸¸š¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ 2. ªú ‚¸£.‡›¸.œ¸¸¿”½ (¨¸¸.), ‚¢÷¸.Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (¨¸¸.)

3. ªú œ¸ú.‡. œ¸¸¿”½, „œ¸ Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ(¨¸¸.) 4. ªú ‡.ˆÅ½. �¸¸¾š¸£ú, ¨¸¢£. œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (¨¸¸.) 5. ªú ‚¸½¬¸¨¸¸¥¸, ¨¸¢£. œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ

VIII œ¸¸¨¸£¢ŠÏ” ˆÅ¸œ¸øÄ£½©¸›¸ ‚¸ÁûÅ ƒ¿¢”¡¸¸ ¢¥¸¢Ÿ¸. 1. ªú Ÿ¸í½›Í ¢¬¸¿í, ˆÅ¸¡¸ÄˆÅ¸£ú ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ (¨¸¸.) 2. ªú ¨¸ú.ˆ½Å. ‰¸£½, Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ - œ¸®¸½-I 3. ªú ‚¸ƒÄ.‡›¸.�¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤ ¿̧š¸ˆÅ (‚¸½ ‡¿” ‡Ÿ¸), œ¸®¸½-II 4. ªú ˆÅŸ¸¥¸ ¬¸£ˆÅ¸£, ‚¢÷¸. Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (‚¸½ ‡¬¸), ˆ½Å›Íú¡¸ ˆÅ¸¡¸¸Ä. 5. ªú ‡.‡¬¸. ˆºÅ©¸¨¸¸í¸, ‚¢÷¸. Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (‡¥¸ ”ú ‡¿” ¬¸ú), ˆ½Å›Íú¡¸ ˆÅ¸¡¸¸Ä. 6. ¬¸ºªú Ÿ¸¿�¸º Š¸ºœ÷¸¸, „œ¸ Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (‡¬¸ƒÄ‡ûÅ), ˆ½Å›Íú¡¸ ˆÅ¸¡¸¸Ä.

IX œ¸¸¨¸£ ¢¬¸¬’Ÿ¸ ‚¸Áœ¸£½©¸›¸ ˆÅ¸œ¸øÄ£½©¸›¸ 1. ªú œ¸ú. œ¸ÿ’¾¡¡¸¸, Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ

2. ªú ‡. Š¸¸£¢÷¸¡¸¸, „œ¸ Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ 3. ªú ¬¸ú.‡¬¸. ¤¸¸½¤¸”õ½, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ (�¸ú‡Ÿ¸) 4. ¬¸ºªú ‡¬¸. …«¸¸, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ X ’¸’¸ œ¸¸¨¸£ ˆ¿Å.

1. ªú ‚©¸¸½ˆÅ ¬¸½“ú, „œ¸¸š¡¸®¸ 2. ªú ¨¸ú.‚¸£. ªú‰¸¿”½, „œ¸ Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ 3. ªú ’ú.ˆ½Å. ž¸¸«ˆÅ£›¸, ¬¸í¸. Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ

-3-

XI ‚¸£�¸úœ¸úœ¸ú‡¥¸ 1. ªú ‡.‡¬¸. œ¸¸¿”½, ¨¸¢£«“ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ

XII ‡›¸‡�¸”ú¬¸ú 1. ªú ‡¬¸.œ¸ú.¢¬¸¿í, Ÿ¸º‰¡¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸

XIII ›¸Ÿ¸Ä™¸ ¢›¸¡¸¿°¸μ¸ œÏ¸¢š¸ˆÅ£μ¸ 1. ªú ‡Ÿ¸.‡.ˆ½Å.œ¸ú. ¢¬¸¿í, ¬¸™¬¡¸ (¢¨¸Ô¸º÷¸) 2. ªú ‡Ÿ¸.ˆ½Å. �¸½’¨¸¸¥¸, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (ƒÄ‡Ÿ¸¬¸ú) XIV ’¸½£ÿ’ œ¸¸¨¸£

1. ªú ‡Ÿ¸.‡�¸. ®¸°¸ú¡¸, Ÿ¸í¸ œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ XV ’úœ¸ú’ú¬¸ú‡¥¸

1. ªú ¢¤¸›¸¡¸ œ¸¸£¸½¥¸, ¨¸¢£. œÏ¤¸¿š¸ˆÅ XVI ˆ½Å›Íú¡¸ ¢¨¸Ô¸º÷¸ œÏ¸¢š¸ˆÅ£μ¸

1. ªú £¢¨¸›Í ˆºÅŸ¸¸£ ¨¸Ÿ¸¸Ä, ¢›¸™½©¸ˆÅ XVII „î¸£ œ¸»¨¸Ä ®¸½°¸ú¡¸ ¢¨¸Ô¸º÷¸ ¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸

1. ªú œ¸ú.”ú. ¢¬¸¨¸¸¥¸, ¬¸™¬¡¸ ¬¸¢�¸¨¸ XVIII œ¸®¸½¢¨¸¬¸¢Ÿ¸¢÷¸, Ÿ¸º¿¤¸ƒÄ

1. ªú ‚¸½.œÏ.¢¬¸¿í, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (¨¸¸.) 2. ªú ¬¸÷¡¸›¸¸£¸¡¸μ¸ ‡¬¸. ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (œÏ�¸¸.) 3. ªú ‡Ÿ¸.‡Ÿ¸. š¸ˆÅ¸÷¸½, ‚š¸ú®¸μ¸ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ (£.) 4. ªú ‡¥¸.ˆ½Å. ‡¬¸ £¸“¸¾£, ¬¸í¸¡¸ˆÅ ¬¸¢�¸¨¸ 5. ªú ”ú.‡›¸. Š¸¨¸¸¥¸ú, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¥¸¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸ 6. ªú œ¸ú.”ú. ¥¸¸½›¸½, ˆÅ¸¡¸Äœ¸¸¥¸ˆÅ ‚¢ž¸¡¸¿÷¸¸