back-scattered electron imaging and elemental microanalysis of retrieved bone tissue following...
TRANSCRIPT
Back-scattered electron imaging andelemental microanalysis of retrievedbone tissue following maxillary sinusfloor augmentation with calciumsulphate
Nicola SlaterAmir DasmahLars SennerbyMats HallmanAdriano PiattelliRachel Sammons
Authors’ affiliations:Nicola Slater, Rachel Sammons, School ofDentistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham,UKAmir Dasmah, Lars Sennerby, Department ofBiomaterials, Institute for Clinical Sciences,Goteborg University, Goteborg , SwedenMats Hallman, Department of Oral & MaxillofacialSurgery, Gavle Hospital, Gavle, SwedenAdriano Piattelli, School of Dentistry, University ofChieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy
Correspondence to:Rachel Sammons, BSc, PhDSchool of DentistryUniversity of BirminghamSt Chad’s QueenswayBirminghamB4 6NNUKTel.: þ 44 121 237 2910Fax: þ 44 121 237 2932e-mail: [email protected]
Key words: back-scattered electron imaging, calcium sulphate, energy dispersive X-ray
analysis, maxillary sinus augmentation, resorption
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the presence and composition of residual bone graft substitute
material in bone biopsies from the maxillary sinus of human subjects, following
augmentation with calcium sulphate (CaS).
Material and methods: Bone cores were harvested from the maxillary sinus of patients who
had undergone a sinus lift procedure using CaS G170 granules 4 months after the initial
surgery. Samples from seven patients, which contained residual biomaterial particles, were
examined by field emission scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy was used to determine the composition of the remaining bone graft
substitute material.
Results: Residual graft material occurred in isolated areas surrounded by bone and
consisted of individual particles up to 1 mm in length and smaller spherical granules. On the
basis of 187 separate point analyses, the residual material was divided into three categories
(A, B and C) consisting of: A, mainly CaS (S/P atomic% ratio � 2.41); B, a heterogeneous
mixture of CaS and calcium phosphate (S/P¼0.11–2.4) and C, mainly calcium phosphate
(S/P�0.11; C), which had a mean Ca : P ratio of 1.63 � 0.2, consistent with Ca-deficient
hydroxyapatite. Linescans and elemental maps showed that type C material was present in
areas which appeared dense and surrounded, or were adjacent to, more granular CaS-
containing material, and also occurred as spherical particles. The latter could be
disintegrating calcium phosphate in the final stages of the resorption process.
Conclusions: CaS resorption in the human maxillary sinus is accompanied by CaP
precipitation which may contribute to its biocompatibility and rapid replacement by bone.
Calcium sulphate hemihydrate (CaS) is a
simple, easy to use, inexpensive bone graft
substitute material, which has been used
clinically for more than a century as a
resorbable biomaterial, which is gradually
replaced by bone (reviewed by Pietrzak &
Ronk 2000).
The rate of adsorption of CaS varies
depending on the in vivo site, chemistry,
and particle size (Tay et al. 1999; Guarnieri
et al. 2004). While resorption may occur at
the same rate as bone formation, it may
also occur faster than bone can form and
this may be clinically disadvantageous in
some sites. Applications of CaS in human
dental surgery include treatment of perio-
dontal defects (Bier & Sinensky 1999;
DiBaltista et al. 1995), repair of fenestra-
tions and bifurcations (Pecora et al. 1998;
Maragos et al. 2002) and alveolar and
maxillary sinus augmentation (de Leonar-
dis & Pecora 1999 & 2000; Guarnieri &
Date:Accepted 3 December 2007
To cite this article:Slater N, Dasmah A, Sennerby L, Hallman M, PiattelliA, Sammons R. Back-scattered electron imaging andelemental microanalysis of retrieved bone tissuefollowing maxillary sinus floor augmentation withcalcium sulphate.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19, 2008; 814–822doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01550.x
814 c� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation c� 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard
Bovi 2002; Guarnieri et al. 2004, 2006). It
can also serve as a barrier in guided tissue
regeneration, preventing the ingress of soft
tissue (Pecora et al. 1997a & b; Orsini et al.
2001; Yoshikawa et al. 2002).
As CaS resorbs, it acts as a direct source
of calcium for new bone formation, while
possibly permitting an earlier ingress of
osteoprogenitor cells in comparison with
less resorbable calcium-containing ceramic
graft materials (McNeill et al. 1999). It has
been shown to evoke a minimal foreign
body response and to result in normal
regeneration of bone (Orsini et al. 2004),
stimulating angiogenesis in rabbits and
aiding the formation of bone by acting as
an osteoconductive matrix for the ingrowth
of blood vessels and associated fibrogenic
and osteogenic cells (Strocchi et al. 2002).
CaS is susceptible to resorption by os-
teoclasts in vitro (Sidqui et al. 1995) and
in vivo resorption may occur due to a
combination of cellular activity and disso-
lution in body fluids. Animal studies have
shown that the dissolution of CaS cement
is accompanied by the precipitation of a
calcium phosphate (CaP) layer around the
particles, to which osteoblasts attach (Ricci
et al. 2000; Orsini et al. 2004) and in a
study in rabbits concentric rings of bone
were seen to have developed around the
dissolving particles (Orsini et al. 2004). At
the molecular level, CaS has been shown to
promote higher levels of signalling mole-
cules such as transforming growth factor-b(TGF-b) and bone morphogenetic proteins,
which may be responsible for the ingress of
osteoprogenitor cells and their differentiation
into mature osteoblasts (Walsh et al. 2003).
Recently, CaS has been reported to modu-
late gene expression in MC3T3-E1 mouse
pre-osteoblastic cells, and specifically to
augment expression of genes involved in
fracture healing including alkaline phospha-
tase, type II collagen and fibronectin 1, in
comparison with polymethylmethacrylate
(Lazary et al. 2007).
Although CaS has been used extensively
as a bone graft substitute material in hu-
mans the mechanism by which it resorbs is
still not clear. To investigate this, it is
necessary to examine healing bone at an
early or intermediate stage when some of
the original graft material is still present.
At the University of Gothenburg, histolo-
gical examination of samples of bone re-
trieved from patients 4 months after sinus
lift augmentation procedures, at the time of
second surgery for placement of dental
implants, showed that they still contained
some residual graft material. The aim of
this study was to use a combination of
back-scattered electron (BSE) imaging and
elemental microanalysis to investigate the
composition of this residual material in
order to shed light on the healing process.
The material used in this study consists
of a mixture of a and b forms of CaS, from
which arsenic, bismuth and strontium
have been removed to achieve a high degree
of purity. This product has been previously
used in humans as a graft material in
extraction sockets (Guarnieri et al. 2004),
for maxillary sinus augmentation (Scarano
et al. 2006) and for peri-implant bone
regeneration (Scarano et al. 2007).
Materials and methods
Surgery and bone retrieval
Specimens from a previous clinical and
histological investigation were used for
further analyses in the present study. In
brief, 10 patients attended the department
of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gavle
Hospital in Gavle Sweden for maxillary
sinus augmentation because of the lack of
sufficient bone tissue for the placement of
endosseous implants. The inclusion criter-
ion for maxillary sinus augmentation was
o5 mm alveolar bone remaining in the
floor of the sinus as determined by conven-
tional tomographic radiography. The pro-
tocol to harvest bone samples was approved
by the local ethics committee and informed
written consent for research was obtained
from all patients.
The maxillary sinus lift procedure was
performed under local anesthesia. A crestal
incision and a vertical releasing incision
were performed, and a mucoperiosteal
flap was elevated and reflected laterally to
expose the lateral wall of the sinus. Using a
round bur under sterile saline solution
irrigation, a 20-mm-wide and 10-mm-
high window was outlined and a ‘trap
door’ was made in the lateral sinus wall.
The door was rotated inward and upward
with a top hinge to a horizontal position.
The Schneiderian membrane was elevated
without laceration and CaS granules (Sur-
giplaster, Ghimas, Bologna, Italy) were
a
b
Fig. 1. Section of retrieved bone stained with toluidine blue from the maxillary sinus of a patient showing
newly formed bone and residual graft material (stained black) 4 months after augmentation with calcium
sulphate. (b). Back-scattered electron image of an area containing bone (left) and graft material (right) from the
other half of the same specimen block.
Slater et al . Calcium sulphate resorption in human maxillary sinus
c� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation c� 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard 815 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19, 2008 / 814–822
mixed following the manufacturer’s guide-
lines and packed into the sinus cavity.
After a healing period of 4 months, the
second-stage surgery was performed to
place dental implants and at the same
time harvest bone biopsies for analysis.
Seven bone samples were retrieved from
the lateral wall using a 4 mm � 10 mm
diameter trephine under sterile saline solu-
tion irrigation. The samples were fixed in
4% formalin, dehydrated with ethanol and
embedded in hexamethylmethacrylate re-
sin. Resin blocks containing the bone sam-
ples were then sectioned under water
irrigation with a band saw to expose the
layer of bone fragment. Sections from half
of each block were processed for histology
and stained with toluidine blue to show
bone and graft material. Blocks were
selected from seven patients in which
residual bone graft substitute had been
identified by histological examination,
as, for example, in Fig. 1. The unused
half of each block was processed for scan-
ning electron microscopy (SEM) and
elemental analysis of the tissues as
described below.
Electron microscopy andelemental analysis
Microscopy and analysis were carried out at
the Centre for Electron Microscopy, Univer-
sity of Birmingham, UK. The surface of each
resin block containing the bone fragment
was polished using a manual grinder
with 800-grit silicone carbide paper. The
blocks were then mounted on an aluminium
stub and carbon coated (Polaron sputter
coater, Quorum Technologies, Ringmer,
UK).
Samples were examined using a field
emission environmental scanning electron
microscope (Philips XL 30 FEG ESEM,
FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) operat-
ing in high vacuum mode at a working
distance of 10 mm and an accelerating vol-
tage of 15 kV. BSE imaging was used to
provide contrast between resin, bone and
biomaterial: generally the resin appeared
black, bone white and biomaterial various
shades of grey. Energy dispersive X-ray spec-
troscopy (EDS) was used to identify and
evaluate the relative concentrations of all
the chemical elements present in the tissues
and was carried out using Oxford INCAt
EDS system (High Wycombe, UK), using
point analysis, line-scan and mapping facil-
ities. Preliminary EDS analysis of Surgipla-
ster graft material confirmed that it
consisted of pure CaS with no impurities
[Ca : S ratio (atomic %)¼1.0].
A total of more than 200-point analyses
were carried out on the seven sections.
These included at least three sites within
bone in areas with no visible adjacent
biomaterial in each section, to determine
the elemental composition of the natural
bone as a base-line for comparison. Data
were then collected from deliberately tar-
geted sites of interest within the biomater-
ial, close to and distal from bone and at the
bone–implant interface if present (an aver-
age of approximately 25 points/section,
depending on the biomaterial content). Ad-
ditional information was obtained from
line scans and elemental maps.
Results
Figure 1a shows an overall view of a section
of one of the seven samples of retrieved bone
stained with toluidine blue. This appearance
was typical of all the samples with some
variations in the amount of biomaterial pre-
sent. The graft material was concentrated in
specific areas surrounded by newly formed
bone and consisted of irregularly shaped
particles up to 1 mm in length or granules
and appeared blue–black, in contrast to the
uniformly blue-stained trabecular bone with
visible osteocyte lacunae and lamellar struc-
ture. A section from a similar area of the
other half of the same block is shown as
observed by SEM, using BSE imaging. Frag-
ments of biomaterial were identified in these
images by their generally grey colour, irre-
1
5
2 4
6
7
3
500µm
Fig. 2. Back-scattered electron image of a resin-embedded bone section containing bone and residual
biomaterial. EDS spectra were collected at the points indicated by the numbered crosses.
Table 1. Elemental composition (atomic %) at each of the points shown in Fig. 2. In thisexample Mg was identified at just one of the points identified within residual biomaterialbut at other locations trace amounts of Na, Mg and occasionally S were detected in bone.
Spectrum C O Na Mg P S Ca Material
1 47.9 37.9 0.4 5.4 8.5 Bone2 73.3 16.1 2.1 2.8 5.8 Biomaterial3 76.3 11.1 0.9 5.2 6.5 Biomaterial4 62.6 25.1 0.2 3.7 1.7 6.8 Biomaterial5 62 23.8 0.2 3.2 2.8 8.0 Biomaterial6 30.3 37.4 0.5 0.2 11.6 20.1 Biomaterial7 59.5 27.7 4.6 0.9 7.3 Bone
Slater et al . Calcium sulphate resorption in human maxillary sinus
816 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19, 2008 / 814–822 c� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation c� 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard
gular shape, or granular appearance, in
contrast to the bone which had a trabecular
structure with well-defined margins, osteo-
cyte lacunae, cement lines, occasional
blood vessel canals and generally a brighter,
whiter and denser appearance in comparison
with the graft biomaterial (Fig. 1b). Full
details of the histology will be reported
elsewhere. From the BSE electron micro-
scopy images, the trabecular bone appeared
to be well-formed and contained regions of
mature bone with spindle-shaped osteocyte
lacunae and aligned collagen fibres and areas
of woven bone, characterized by larger
rounder osteocyte lacunae and non-aligned
collagen.
Elemental point analysis
EDS point analysis was used to identify and
determine the relative concentrations of
all elements present at 27 separate points
within bone and 187 points within
biomaterial in the seven sections. A typical
site of interest and the results of
point analysis are shown in Fig. 2 and
corresponding Table 1. Ca, P, C and O,
were always detected in bone, together
with trace amounts of Na, Mg and S
although these were not always detected.
Na and Mg detected in ‘biomaterial’ could
be attributed to signal from underlying
or adjacent bone in the section or to
substitution with these ions. The average
Ca : P ratio in bone was 1.77� 0.47
(atomic %; n¼27).
EDS analysis of the residual graft material
particles in the retrieved tissue revealed CaS
and CaP in every variable relative proportions.
The material was classified into three differ-
ent categories (A, B and C) on the basis of the
relative amounts of Ca, S and P (Fig. 3) from
the point analysis data. Material A most
closely resembled the original graft material
with approximately equal amounts of Ca and
S and low amounts of P (atomic %
S/P � 2.41, or no P detected). Material B
had higher but very variable relative amounts
of S and P (S/P¼0.11–2.4); Material C con-
tained large amounts of Ca and P and very
little S (S/P�0.1). Material C was of a more
uniform consistency and appeared denser
than A or B. The average ratios of the three
elements, Ca, S and P are shown in Table 2
together with the standard deviation of the
means. The more consistent composition of
type C CaP material (Fig. 3 and Table 2)
suggests that this could represent the final
stage of the replacement process, where
dissolution/precipitation has reached a steady
state. This material had an average Ca/P
ratio of 1.63� 0.21 (Table 2), consistent
with calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite
(stoichiometric hydroxyapatite has a Ca/P
ratio of 1.67).
b
Ato
mic
%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Sample No.
0
5
10
15
20
25P S Ca
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Ato
mic
%
P S Ca
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
a
Ato
mic
%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Sample No.
P S Cac
Fig. 3. Atomic percentages of Ca, P and S within residual graft material at different points of analysis in
different samples, illustrating the difference between biomaterial classified as A, B or C. (a) Biomaterial A: high
Ca and S, low P; (b) Biomaterial B: intermediate levels of all three elements; (c) Biomaterial C: high Ca and P,
low S. For clarity data from only 20 samples in each group are shown. Total numbers in each category and
average atomic percentage ratios of each pair of elements are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Comparison of the relative amounts of Ca, P and S in Biomaterial classified as A, Band C from point analysis results shown in Fig. 3
Biomaterial BSE appearance Ca/P Ca/S S/P N
A Dense grey 8.5 � 5.5 1.4 � 0.6 6.8 � 6 32B Granular grey 2 � 1.4 5.4 � 5.4 0.7 � 0.5 79C Dense white 1.6 � 0.2 39.1 � 15.5 0.06 � 0.11 76Total 187
Figures indicate the average (atomic %) ratio of each pair of elements � the standard deviation.
N is the number of points analysed. Highest levels of sulphur were detected in A and least in
C which appeared denser and whiter than A or B but was still distinguishable from bone by the
absence of lacunae.
BSE, back-scattered electron.
Slater et al . Calcium sulphate resorption in human maxillary sinus
c� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation c� 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard 817 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19, 2008 / 814–822
Hydroxyapatite is the most stable form
of CaP above pH 4 and the most similar
to the mineral phase of bone, which con-
sists of carbonate-substituted hydroxyapa-
tite. These results are consistent with
a gradual resorption of the CaS graft
material and its replacement by CaP,
as occurs in animals (Ricci et al. 2000;
Orsini et al. 2004).
Line scans
To investigate the distribution of CaS and
CaP in selected areas and individual bio-
material particles, line scans were carried
out, as shown in an example in Fig. 4. The
analysis indicated that this individual par-
ticle contained both CaS and CaP with
CaS more concentrated at one end and CaP
at the other with a mixture of the two in
the central region. Line scans were per-
formed on particles in other sections and
in every case high levels of P occurred in
regions with low levels of S (and vice
versa), consistent with the replacement of
CaS with precipitated CaP as it gradually
dissolves.
Elemental maps
Elemental mapping, as illustrated in Figs 5
and 6, showed the infiltration of CaP into
regions of resorbing CaS. Figure 5 shows an
area of graft material consisting of a grey
granular area with an adjacent whiter and
denser ‘crust-like’ area. The smaller grains
of darker grey appearance were CaS while
the denser whiter material consisted
mainly of CaP. Figure 6 shows the analysis
of granular material consisting of areas of
large roughly spherical particles and smal-
ler granules: CaP was concentrated in the
larger particles and the smaller granules
were CaS. There were also a few very small
fragments of apparently pure CaS, indi-
cated by arrows in Fig. 6.
Discussion
CaS has been used very successfully for
augmentation of bone in the maxillary
sinus in preparation for insertion of dental
root implants. Radiographic and histologi-
cal evidence suggests that the material
gradually resorbs completely as it is slowly
replaced by bone, by a process of creeping
substitution. In animals, this process has
been shown to involve the formation of a
CaP layer, which forms on the surface of
the dissolving material. The purpose of this
investigation was to use EDS microanaly-
sis to observe whether the same phenom-
enon occurs in human bone. In humans, it
is clearly not possible to obtain samples of
bone at different time points during heal-
ing; it is only ethical to retrieve bone at the
time of second surgery to place the im-
plants. However, because resorption is a
gradual process, if implant placement and
bone retrieval is done early enough it may
be possible to observe and analyse the
bone-substitute graft material at different
stages of resorption. Previous studies on
human bone augmented with CaS 6
months after initial surgery indicated that
no CaS remained in the tissues at this time
Fig. 4. Line-scan showing relative concentrations of Ca, P and S along a line passing through bone (1) and a
graft biomaterial particle (areas 2 and 3): Ca (green); P (blue); S (red). For clarity the scan result is also shown
separately in the lower figure. Bone is distinguishable from graft material buy the presence of lacunae, whiter
appearance and the low level of sulphur. Area 2 of the biomaterial contains CaS and CaP. Area 3 of the same
particle consists mainly of CaP.
Fig. 5. Elemental maps showing relative concentra-
tions of Ca, P and S within resorbing graft material.
The upper bse image shows the material in relation
to surrounding bone (B). The lower figures show
corresponding elemental maps: Ca (green); P (blue);
S (red). Most of the material in this area is CaP,
consisting of an outer denser brighter "crust-like"
layer (below, right) and a grey more granular region
(above). S was detected throughout the area in low
concentrations, with a higher level along a "seam"
(arrowed) between the granular and denser CaP
regions.
Slater et al . Calcium sulphate resorption in human maxillary sinus
818 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19, 2008 / 814–822 c� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation c� 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard
Slater et al . Calcium sulphate resorption in human maxillary sinus
c� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation c� 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard 819 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19, 2008 / 814–822
although there were small fragments
of biomaterial present, as shown by
polarized light and fluorescence micro-
scopy (Orsini et al. 2004; Traini et al.
2008). The present study was a retrospec-
tive investigation of bone biopsies
from patients retrieved 4 months after in-
itial surgery, in which residual biomaterial
had been previously identified by light
microscopy.
The results of this study indicated that
the residual biomaterial consisted of a mix-
ture of CaS and CaP. Because it had been
confirmed that the graft material consisted
only of CaS, any phosphate present in the
biomaterial must have originated from host
bone or body fluids. The results obtained
are consistent with particle resorption from
the outside inwards (Ricci et al. 2000;
Orsini et al. 2004; Atilgan et al. 2007)
with the formation of a CaP layer at the
surface of dissolving CaS, as has been
shown to occur in animals and can be
demonstrated to occur in vitro in simulated
body fluid (Ricci et al. 2000; Mamidwar
et al. 2007). The formation of a CaP layer
also occurs on other calcium salts used as
graft materials, for example calcium
carbonate (Damien et al. 1994). CaP was
also present as small granules, which may
Fig. 6. Elemental map showing the distribution of Ca, P and S in a granular area of resorbing graft material. The upper bse image shows the material in relation to adjacent bone
(B); the lower figures show a magnified bse image of the area within the box (size bar ¼ 100 mm) and corresponding elemental maps: Ca (green); P (blue); S (red). S was mainly
detected in the smaller granules or very small, apparently pure CaS fragments, indicated by arrow. The larger, brighter, roughly spherical particles consisted of CaP.
Slater et al . Calcium sulphate resorption in human maxillary sinus
820 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19, 2008 / 814–822 c� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation c� 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard
have originated from disintegrating larger
particles or a surface layer or be formed by
spontaneous precipitation from saturated
body fluids. Biomaterial C would appear
to be the final stage of the replacement
process, as suggested by its more consistent
composition and its Ca/P ratio, which was
consistent with calcium-deficient hydro-
xyapatite, possibly substituted with
sodium, carbonate and magnesium ions.
The formation of a CaP layer on the
surface of CaS may be the key to its
biocompatibility because the mechanism
of bone-bonding to CaP graft materials
such as hydroxyapatite and other bioactive
materials is believed to involve precipita-
tion of calcium and phosphate ions at the
bone-biomaterial interface with the forma-
tion of carbonate apatite, forming a bridge
to the host bone (Ducheyne et al. 1992;
Kokubo et al. 1992). In addition, high
levels of Ca2þ may stimulate osteogenesis
by their effects on osteoblast gene expres-
sion (Lazary et al. 2007).
The fate of the newly formed CaP parti-
cles is not known although all the histolo-
gical evidence suggests that they are
resorbed or incorporated into bone where
they may undergo further remodelling. As
mentioned above, histological studies of
bone retrieved from human patients under-
going sinus lift procedures, 6 months after
initial surgery revealed residual biomaterial
particles adjacent to woven or mature bone
with no signs of inflammatory infiltrate
or soft tissue at the interface (Traini et al.
2008). In that publication the residual
biomaterial was referred to as CaS;
however, subsequent EDS analysis of
one of same specimens has shown that a
particle identified on the basis of polarized
light microscopy as biomaterial, was
actually CaP. The continued presence of
CaP particles after the CaS has disappeared
may be advantageous because they
maintain space and may encourage angio-
genesis.
The presence of relatively large amounts
of biomaterial in these samples after 4
months is perhaps surprising since previous
studies both in animals and humans have
reported faster resorption rates and almost
complete disappearance of the biomaterial
at earlier or comparable times. However,
many reports are based on radiographic
evidence which may not reveal residual
granules especially if they are disintegrat-
ing into smaller particles and have trans-
formed to CaP and are thus very similar in
composition to bone. Histological findings
may reveal residual particles not seen in
radiographs, as in a study of CaS resorption
in a medullary defect in canines after 13
weeks (Turner et al. 2003). Variation in
individual rates of resorption can be seen
even with a small number of patients, as in
this study, in which histological examina-
tion of specimens from three of the 10
patients did not show any residual parti-
cles. Further studies are necessary to in-
vestigate what factors may be responsible
for the variation. These could include
location of particles within the graft site
and the degree of compaction, individual
patient sinus anatomy and healing
capacity.
In conclusion, this study has clearly
shown the presence of CaP as well as
CaS in human bone tissue augmented by
CaS in the maxillary sinus and the
results suggest that as CaS dissolves it is
replaced by precipitated CaP, as has been
previously shown to occur in animals.
The formation of a CaP layer may
be an essential intermediate step in bone
bonding and contribute to the excellent
biocompatibility of this bone graft substi-
tute material.
Acknowledgements: We thank Paul
Stanley of the University of
Birmingham Centre for Electron
Microscopy for assistance with SEM and
elemental analysis.
References
Atilgan, S., Yaman, F., Yilmaz, U., Gorgun, B. &
Unlu, G. (2007) An experimental comparison
of the effects of calcium sulfate particles and
b-tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite granules
on osteogenesis in internal bone cavities. Biotech-
nology and Biotechnological Equipment 21:
205–210.
Bier, S.J. & Sinensky, M.C. (1999) The versatility of
calcium sulfate: resolving periodontal challenges.
Compendium of Continuing Education in Den-
tistry 20: 655–661.
Damien, C.J., Ricci, J.L., Christel, P., Alexander, H.
& Patat, J.L. (1994) Formation of a calcium
phosphate-rich layer on absorbable calcium carbo-
nate bone graft substitutes. Calcified Tissue Inter-
national 55: 151–158.
De Leonardis, D. & Pecora, G.E. (1999) Augmenta-
tion of the maxillary sinus with calcium sulphate:
one-year clinical report from a prospective long-
itudinal study. International Journal of Oral &
Maxillofacial Implants 14: 869–878.
DeLeonardis, D. & Pecora, G.E. (2000) Prospective
study on the augmentation of the maxillary sinus
with calcium sulfate: histological results. Journal
of Periodontology 71: 940–947.
DiBattista, P., Bissada, N.F. & Ricchetti, P.A. (1995)
Comparative effectiveness of various regenerative
modalities for the treatment of localized juvenile
periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology 66: 673–678.
Ducheyne, P., Bianco, S., Radin, S. & Schepers, E.
(1992) Bioactive materials: mechanisms and
bioengineering considerations. In: Ducheyne, P.,
Kokubo, T. & van Blitterswijk, C.A., eds. Bone-
Bonding Biomaterials, 1–12. Leiderdorp: Reed
Healthcare Communications.
Guarnieri, R. & Bovi, M. (2002) Maxillary sinus
augmentation using prehardened calcium
sulfate: a case report. International Journal of
Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 22:
503–508.
Guarnieri, R., Pecora, G., Fini, M., Aldini, N.,
Giardino, R., Orsini, G. & Piattelli, A. (2004) A.
medical grade calcium sulfate hemihydrate in
healing of human extraction sockets: clinical and
histological observations at 3. months. Journal of
Periodontology 75: 902–908.
Guarnieri, R., Grassi, R., Ripari, M. & Pecora, G.
(2006) Maxillary sinus augmentation using gran-
ular calcium sulfate (surgiplaster sinus): radio-
graphic and histologic study at 2 years.
International Journal of Periodontics and Re-
storative Dentistry 26: 79–85.
Kokubo, T. (1992) Bioactivity of glasses and glass
ceramics. In: Ducheyne, P., Kokubo, T. & van
Blitterswijk, C.A., eds. Bone-Bonding Biomater-
ials, 31–46. Leiderdorp: Reed Healthcare Com-
munications.
Lazary, A., Balla, B., Janos, P., Kusa, A., Bacsi, K.,
Nagy, Z., Takacs, I., Varga, P., Speer, G. &
Lakatos, P. (2007) Effect of gypsum on prolifera-
tion and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 mouse
osteoblastic cells. Biomaterials 28: 393–399.
Maragos, P., Bissada, N.F., Wang, R. & Cole, R.P.
(2002) Comparison of three methods using cal-
cium sulfate as a graft barrier material for the
treatment of Class II mandibular molar furcation
defects. International Journal of Periodontics and
Restorative Dentistry 22: 493–501.
Mamidwar, S.S., Arena, C., Kelly, S., Alexander, H. &
Ricci, J. (2007) In vitro characterization of a calcium
sulfate/PLLA composite for use as a bone graft
material. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Part B: Applied Biomaterials 81B: 57–65.
McNeill, S.R., Cobb, C.M., Rapley, J.W., Glaros, A.G.
& Spencer, P. (1999) In vivo comparison of synthetic
Slater et al . Calcium sulphate resorption in human maxillary sinus
c� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation c� 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard 821 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19, 2008 / 814–822
osseous graft materials. A preliminary study. Journal
of Clinical Periodontology 26: 239–245.
Orsini, G., Ricci, J., Scarano, A., Pecora, G., Pet-
rone, G., Iezzi, G. & Piattelli (2004) A Bone defect
healing with calcium sulphate particles
and cement: an experimental study in rabbits.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 68B:
199–208.
Orsini, M., Orsini, G., Benlloch, D., Aranda, J.J.,
Sanz, M., De Luca, M. & Piattelli, A. (2001)
Comparison of calcium sulfate and autogenous
bone graft to bioabsorbable membranes plus auto-
genous bone graft in the treatment of intrabony
periodontal defects: a split-mouth study. Journal
of Periodontology 72: 296–302.
Pecora, G., Andreana, S., Margarone, J.E., Covani,
U. & Sottosanti, J.S. (1997a) Bone regeneration
with a calcium sulphate barrier. Oral Surgery
Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
and Endontology 84: 424–429.
Pecora, G., Baek, S.H., Rethnam, S. & Kim, S.
(1997b) Barrier membrane techniques in endodon-
tic microsurgery. Dental Clinics of North Amer-
ica 41: 585–602.
Pecora, G., De Leonardis, D., Ibrahim, N., Bovi, M.
& Cornelini, R. (2001) The use of calcium sulfate
in the surgical treatment of a ‘‘through and
through’’ periradicular lesion. International En-
dodontic Journal 34: 189–197.
Pecora, G.E., De Leonardis, D., Della Rocca, C.,
Cornelini, R. & Cortesini, C. (1998) Short-term
healing following the use of calcium sulfate as a
grafting material for sinus augmentation. A clin-
ical report. International Journal of Oral & Max-
illofacial Implants 13: 866–873.
Pietrzak, W.S. & Ronk, R. (2000) Calcium sulfate
bone void filler: a review and a look ahead. Journal
of Craniofacial Surgery 11: 327–333.
Ricci, J.L., Alexander, H., Nadkarni, P., Hawkins,
M., Turner, J., Rosenblum, S., Brezenoff, L., De
Leonardis, D. & Pecora, G. (2000) Biological
mechanisms of calcium sulfate replacement by
bone. In: Davies, J.E., ed. Bone Engineering,
332–344. Toronto: Em Squared Incorporated.
Scarano, A., Degide, M., Iezzi, G., Pecora, G.,
Piattelli, M., Orsini, G., Caputi, S., Perrotti, V.,
Mangano, C. & Piattelli, A. (2006) Maxillary
sinus augmentation with different biomaterials:
a comparative histologic and histomorphometric
study in man. Implant Dentisty 15: 197–207.
Scarano, A., Orisini, G., Pecora, G., Iezzi, G.,
Perotti, V. & Piattelli, A. (2007) Peri-implant
bone regeneration with calcium sulfate: a light
and transmission electron microscopy case report.
Implant Dentisty 16: 195–203.
Sidqui, M., Collin, P., Vitte, C. & Forest, N. (1995)
Osteoblast adherence and resorption activity of
isolated osteoclasts on calcium sulfate hemihy-
drate. Biomaterials 16: 1327–1332.
Strocchi, R., Orsini, G., Iezzi, G., Scarano, A.,
Rubini, C., Pecora, G. & Piattelli, A. (2002)
Bone regeneration with calcium sulfate: evidence
for an increased angiogenesis in rabbits. Journal of
Oral Implantology 28: 273–278.
Tay, B.K., Patel, V.V. & Bradford, D.S. (1999)
Calcium sulfate and calcium phosphate-based
bone substitutes. Mimicry of the mineral phase
of bone. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 30:
615–623.
Traini, T., Iezzi, G., Sammons, R., Scarano, A.,
Pecora, G., Fiera, E. & Piattelli, A. (2008) Histo-
logic and ultrastructural analysis of bone regenera-
tion in maxillary sinus augmentation using a
calcium sulphate biomaterial. Clinical Implant
Dentistry and Related Research, in press.
Turner, T.M., Urban, R.M., Gitelis, S., Haggard,
W.O. & Richelsoph, K. (2003) Resorption evalua-
tion of a large bolus of calcium sulfate in a
canine medullary defect. Orthopaedics 26:
S577–S579.
Walsh, W.R., Morberg, P., Yu, Y., Yang, Jj.L., Hag-
gard, W., Sheath, P.C., Svela, M. & Bruce, W.J.
(2003) Response of a calcium sulfate bone graft
substitute in a confined cancellous defect. Clin-
ical Orthopaedics and Related Research 406:
228–236.
Yoshikawa, G., Murashima, Y., Wadachi, R.,
Sawada, N. & Suda, H. (2002) Guided
bone regeneration (GBR) using membranes
and calcium sulphate after apicectomy.
A comparative histomorphometrical study.
International Endodontic Journal 35:
255–263.
Slater et al . Calcium sulphate resorption in human maxillary sinus
822 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19, 2008 / 814–822 c� 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation c� 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard