back to office report on joint un agencies and federal ......adaptation components to be direct in...
TRANSCRIPT
Reported By Joint Monitoring Mission Team:
Mesfin Berhanu (PCO), Netsanet Deneke (UNEP), Dr. Ahmed Mohammed (FAO),
Saba Habtu (EPA), Solomon Tadesse (MOA), Zealbowosen Asfaw (UNDP) and Atlaw
Belayneh (FAO).
August/ 2012
Back to Office Report on Joint UN Agencies and Federal
Implementing Partners Field Monitoring and Technical
Backstopping Mission to Somali and Oromia Regions on
MDG–F Environment Joint Program
Ministry Of Agriculture
1
Project: Enabling Pastoral Communities to adapt to Climate Change and Restoring Rangelands Environment
Places Visited: Somali and Oromia Regions – 3 Project Weredas and eight target PAs Duration: July 16 – 30/2012 Mission Members/Agencies:
1. Ato Mesfin Berhanu (PCO), Team Leader
2. Ato Netsanet Deneke (UNEP)
3. Dr. Ahmed Mohammed (FOA - Jijiga office)
4. Ms Saba Habtu (EPA)
5. Ato Solomon Tadesse (MOA)
6. Ato Zealbowosen Asfaw (UNDP)
7. Ato Ahmed Seid (Somali region Environment JP Focal Person)
8. Ato Abas (Somali region LCRDB)
9. Ato Mohamed Jama (Harshin Wereda Environment JP Officer)
10. Ato Abdurahman Redwan (Aysha Wereda Environment JP Officer)
11. Ato Humnesa G/selasie (Oromia region Environment JP Focal Person)
12. Ato Mohamed Sheko (Teltle Wereda Environment JP Officer)
13. Ato Atlaw Belayneh (FOA - Borena office)
BACKGROUND TO THE M ISSION
The MDG – F Environment Joint Programme has been implemented in four pastoral regions of Ethiopia - Afar,
Somali, Oromia & SNNP - since July 8, 2010. Its core objective is to enhance enabling policy environment to
effectively plan and execute pastoralist oriented climate change adaptation and mitigation measures at federal,
regional and district levels; and pilot measures to enable the pastoral communities develop capacity for managing
climate change risks and shocks in six districts. The joint programme (JP) involves the participation of pastoral
communities in six targeted Weredas, federal, regional and local government institutions, and three UN agencies
(UNDP, UNEP & FAO) within the framework of UNDAF and the “Delivering as one” agenda.
In materializing the core objectives, the programme intervention approaches includes: development and
implementation of consolidated adaptation programme including alternative income generation opportunities;
improving rangeland management; raising awareness of stakeholders on adaptation options; empowering pastoral
2
communities to better participate in decision making related to their livelihoods and integrating these options in
relevant sector development plans and policies.
In view of addressing the management and coordination of the program, two types of committees, National
Steering Committee (NSC) and Program Management Committee (PMC), were established at national level. The
NSC’s role is to provide oversight and strategic guidance to the JP. While the PMC, a technical committee at the
national level, is entrusted with the key role to provide operational coordination to the JP. The PMC regularly meets
on a quarterly basis and address issues related directly to management and implementation of the JP.
As part of programme implementation, MTE conducted by external consultant has principally recommended
conducting review workshop, developing and implementing improvement plan and strengthened joint field
monitoring and technical backstopping services to region and Wereda implementing partners conducted a MTE.
Thus, the joint field monitoring and technical backstopping mission was emanated from the MTE.
Accordingly, the PCO in consultation with PMC has developed ToR for and mobilized a joint monitoring and
technical backstopping mission to Afar, SNNP, Oromia and Somali regions. The mission was executed by two
groups comprising participants from each partner UN and government organizations while the participants from
PCO handled the role of team leaders.
During the field mission, Group one has covered Somali and Oromia regions and three targeted Weredas and
eight Kebeles, while Group two covered Afar and SNNP regions and three targeted Weredas and nine Kebeles.
The two groups were on mission for 15 days as of July 16, 2012.
Presumably, the joint UN agencies and government field monitoring and technical backstopping mission to
implementing regions was conducted with the understanding that a combined effort of all participating partners
substantially result in greater outcomes and a successful programme implementation during the remaining project
life which extends up to end of March, 2013.
1. Objectives of the Mission
The joint monitoring and technical backstopping mission principally focused on collecting and analyzing information
especially on substantive indicators at the activity, output and outcome levels. To pursue this, a checklist has been
used for data collection and showing progress in attaining the programme deliverables.
In view of that, the overall objective of the field mission was designed to share information and progress updates;
identify constraints and recommend actions and means for speeding up the accomplishment of the programme
deliverables in the remaining implementation period; to discuss and facilitate liquidation of aged advance which
3
has impeded further advance transfer and collect financial and progress reports of the 4th quarter; and initiate
advance request as per the reprogrammed AWP.
Generally, the joint field monitoring function were:
• Results oriented, meaning its main goal is to report on progress on the high level of the logical causal
chain, especially changes at the output and outcomes level.
• Substantive in nature on regards of measuring changes in citizen’s, institutions or any other kind of
stakeholder participating in the program.
• Aggregational as a mean, is the first element of a causal chain on the whole system that is oriented to
learn and to know what works and what does not and improves programme accordingly.
2. Specific Objectives
The specific joint monitoring mission objectives were:
• Assess progress of the JP in regional IPs, targeted Weredas and Kebeles; and identify challenges and
provide technical support to overcome the problems and speed – up implementation.
• Discuss technical backstopping required from partner UN agencies and federal government organizations
to ascertain programme deliverables.
• Ascertain the Reprogrammed Work plan implementation and increase participants’ awareness on the exit
strategy, communication and advocacy strategic framework, and responsibilities for final programme
evaluation.
3. Field Monitoring Mission Methodology
Results-based monitoring and evaluation in this monitoring mission is basically the area where more focus was
given to assess the performance of MDGE programme, on the basis of impacts and benefits that /project is
expected to produce and examine progress on the high level of the logical causal chain, especially changes at the
output and outcomes level.
In undertaking the joint monitoring and technical backstopping missions, the team has
• Prepared ToR and checklist on major activities of the mission.
• Collected data, assessed progresses and discusses with IP regions and targeted Weredas and Kebeles
on physical activities conducted, fund arrival, procurement, fund utilization, awareness of beneficiary
communities, etc.
4
• Discussed and identified technical backstopping needs of Regions, Weredas and targeted Kebeles.
• Ascertained action plan preparation and proper implantation of the Reprogrammed WP, oriented RIPs
and WIPs on exit strategy, communication, and advocacy framework.
• Identified challenges encountered and recommend solution; and provided technical support to overcome
the challenges.
• Identified best practices developed during the interventions and suggest possible dissemination for further
scaling up.
• Produced back to office report.
4. Mission Findings on Progresses Made in Implementation
Since the deployment of the mission team in both regions a multiple of approach were used to explore information
onto the executed activities and measure the results in terms of progress on the high level of the logical causal
chain, especially changes at the output and outcomes level. Accordingly, the team made its first entry by briefing
with the Somali LCNRD bureau. Secondly travelled to Harshin and Aysha Weredas where the Environment JP has
been implemented since 2010. Following the completion of the Somali trip, the mission has traveled to Teltele
Wereda of Oromia region for similar monitoring and technical backstopping mission.
On arrival to Somali Regional State, Jijiga, the mission team conducted briefing session on the presence of Mr.
Abdulkedir Mohamed Farah, deputy head of Somali LCNRD bureau. The briefing includes explanation of the
objective of the joint monitoring mission, orientation of exit strategy, sharing information on the schedule of
upcoming joint monitoring plan, reminding the preparation of programme closure plan and handing over
requirements, and discussion on major challenges encountered. After briefing session, based on sent checklist, the
focal person of Somali region, Mr. Ahmed Seid, has provided performance report to the mission members. From
the report the mission team has realized that the Harshin and Ayesha CC adaptation action plan preparation,
which is previously reported by EPA as completed activity, is not yet accomplished and need EPA’s close follow-up
of the case to immediately rectify the problem associated with budget utilization.
In reflection to the mission briefing, the deputy bureau head has acknowledged the mission presence at this point
in time and considerable acceptances of the mission plan in this monitoring and technical backstopping mission in
the region.
He further critically stressed that environmental impact in the Somali region in the state of tense and critically
affected the entire people in the region through rainfall shortage, degradation of grazing lands as well as vanishing
5
water points that heavily encountered livestock productivity. Therefore, strongly belief that the MDGE programme
is designed to bring change in the lives of the pastoral community from the outset through a concerted effort of the
government and the UN agencies.
He also explicitly made clear to the mission that the region needs a feedback about recurring weaknesses and
strength in areas where there are positive results. He also strongly emphasized that the mission to look deeply in
to those positive results that can be scaled up to disseminate to the rest of the region.
Similarly, the mission team has briefed the objective of the mission, shared information of upcoming monitoring
schedule and informed the remaining period of the project to the Harshin and Aysha Weredas administration and
project implementation team members before conducting field visit to the Kebeles and project beneficiaries. On the
briefing session, representatives from Wereda women affairs, capacity building, revenue office, food security/DPP/,
education, finance and economic development office, health office and agricultural office were present.
Fig 1: Partial View of Joint Field Monitoring Mission Participants
The report herein after deals the progress attained in each Wereda in terms of changes in outputs and outcomes to
show a distinct picture of the effort made by the three districts (Harshine, Ayesha and Teletele) and their
commitments to accomplish those activities that needs a particular attention of the regional and Wereda
programme implementation Teams.
4.1. Harshine Wereda
The field visit in Harshin was carried out in Medewin, Farah liben and Hafufile PAs. The joint mission on its
assessment has observed the following strong sides of the program:
� The Wereda Project Implementation Team (PIT) explained that the project has been running by Wereda
PIT in coordinated and integrated way. In line with this, three consultative joint monitoring was conducted
by the Wereda PMC this year to follow up the project implementation.
6
� During the discussion, the mission team observed strong commitment and ownership of the Wereda
administration toward the MDG-F project implementation.
� From discussions made with beneficiaries it was understood that almost all of the components were been
liked and preferred by the community which indicates the appropriateness of all of the program`s
adaptation components to be direct in addressing the climate change risks.
� Community’s strong commitment in water harvesting activities i.e., taking part in excavation of the pond
that is estimated to be more than Eth. Birr 100,000. This is an outstanding achievement, acceptance of
the project and indicates that water is the basic needs of the local community in the project area. The
mission has witnessed the construction of four rectangular ponds (“Birka”) each with a 1000 m3 capacity,
out of which two of them are under construction and the other two Birkas are fully functional in providing
water to both human and livestock in the localities. The functioning Birkas are located one at Farah liben
Kebele specifically at Shakalo sub Kebele and the second one is at Afulfle Kebele at Finin sub Kebele.
The total population estimated to benefit from the water sources are 6300 people dwelling in the Kebeles.
The Birkas are more or less full of rainwater generated from the catchments. They are equipped with
three steps silt trap for first hand purification of water, covered with corrugated sheet roof to ensure better
quality water, and minimized evaporation. This will reserve the water for at least 4 to 5 months in sufficient
quantity and quantity.
� A preliminary impact seems to appearing in two of the completed large size Birkas in Afulfle and Farah
liben Kebeles that was discovered through community consultation. About 6300 beneficiaries gained
advantage of closer accessibility (from 5minutes to two hours) as compared to the past long travels that
took (4-6 hours) in fetching and drinking water for people and livestock respectively. In both cases, the
local communities used to travel long distance to fetch drinking water and it is compulsory to buy water
from the private Birkas. The construction of Birkas has substantially reduced money spent for water and
has helped saving to some extent.
Fig 2: 1000 m3 capacity Birka constructed at Harshin Wereda
7
� The water committee and beneficiaries are planning to collect money from local communities for water
structure maintenance is exemplary and strong point that needs close support to keep the created
momentum. Furthermore, some water schemes are protected by constructed fence that should also be
promoted and enhanced at all points.
Fig 3: Joint Mission Team Members Discussion with Beneficiaries and WATSAN Committee Members.
� The beneficiaries of the project explained their level of participation during site selection and preference
of water scheme. However, some water schemes, Birka, in Badawi Kebele need due attention to finalize
the construction and to harvest water during upcoming rain season. In addition to these, community labor
contribution on water structure, which the beneficiaries have been conducting, can be taken as a
guarantee for sustainability of the constructed water structures.
� In practicing adaptation activities to halt climate change risks such community involvement in water
harvesting activities shows the degree of confidence that the impact of climate change on water
availability and access could be tackled and pastoralist`s adaptive capacity to adverse effects of drought
can be strengthened in the Wereda.
� Though there are rooms to diversify the IGA types, the preference of livestock marketing by the
cooperatives is because of the comparative advantage the region has in livestock resource.
Fig 4: Partial View of Women Organized in IGA Cooperative – Petty Trading at Harshin Wereda.
8
� The endeavors of livestock marketing cooperatives aimed to implement income diversification and solve
livestock market problems (proper committee set up that gave the due emphasis to women’s participation,
collecting registration and share fees, preparing bylaws and stamps, starting up of the marketing activities
prior to the release of the programs budget…) are observed very encouraging. Despite that, the long
process and lack of coordination between regional cooperative office and Wereda project office delayed
the process of having legal license and bank account opening. Therefore, the need for the Wereda PIT
and project officer to facilitate the process urgently is very crucial.
� The amount of contribution from cooperative members varies from one to the other and on average about
Birr 10,000 is contributed as a startup capital eligibility to be a formal cooperative. This has significant
impact on creating sense of ownership and it also creates strong capital during financial transaction.
Therefore, the monitoring mission team took it as good practice. On the other hand, weak integration and
low awareness during organizing the cooperative in Farah Liben Kebele need urgent and fast amendment
measure to strengthen and make functional the established cooperatives.
� Though the construction of Nursery fence, office, store, and fulfilling of tree seeds, water ponds, and
nursery tools and equipment for the nursery site in the Wereda are commendable, seedling production is
weak and showed less follow-up from all concerned bodies including Wereda project office.
Fig 5: Poorly Managed Tree Nursery at Harshin Wereda
� Despite the fact that the success of rehabilitating the rangelands in the Wereda is largely dependent on
the availability of rain fall, 25 hectares of rangeland development accompanied by activities that include
bush clearing and area enclosure supported by construction of moisture harvesting structures are
implemented as per the work plan. However, the intended rehabilitation of the rangeland is constrained by
the drought that occurred during previous year.
9
Fig 6: Degraded Rangeland Rehabilitation Work at Harshin Wereda.
� Rehabilitation of additional six animal health posts in Harshin Wereda is a good example for efficient
utilization of resource and should be encouraged. All the health posts in the target Kebeles are
rehabilitated and furnished. They are fully functional on outreach services and at easy reach for
pastoralists at times of livestock disease outbreak and medical treatments need. Further, the required
drugs and medical equipment planned for 2004 EFY are fully purchased and ready for distributions.
Fig 7: Procured Livestock Drug Ready for Distribution to Animal Health Posts
Further, field monitoring mission at Harshin Wereda has identified activities that are lagging behind the program`s
schedule and require technical backstopping. The major tasks/issues which need to get emphasis and technical
backstopping from both partner UN agencies and federal, regional and Wereda implementing government
organizations are:
� Considering the allotted budget and the duration of implementation, the remaining volume of work
regarding water harvesting needs further acceleration to take advantage of the up-coming short rainy
season to harvest sufficient water. The remaining works should be accomplished prior to the onset of the
rain.
� Fencing of completed “Birkas” in order to avoid risks emanating from falling children or livestock into the
pond; and establishment of water management committees from communities settled just closer to the
10
ponds or the Birkas are more useful to closely administer the water. The existing water management
committees located at PAs levels are very far from the constructed water points and non-functional.
� Facilitating ways and means of getting legal status of the Livestock Marketing Cooperatives( legal status
certification, opening up of bank accounts, printing of vouchers,…) which can assist and hasten the
release of the programme`s budget that can play a fundamental role to accomplish the objectives of this
component.
� Solve nursery management problems like: (lack of proper soil mixture, use of inappropriate size of
polythene bag that is less than 8cm lay flat, use of inappropriate seed bed, (should be sunken rather than
raised), inability to raise the planned amount of seedlings in the midst of sufficient working budget, lack of
closer monitoring of the nursery) which otherwise hindered programme performance. The initial plan was
to raise 100,000 fodder and other conservation tree species, however, only close 2000 stunted tree
seedling are raised.
� Refilling of the poorly designed moisture harvesting structures, those constructed within the enclosed
rangelands, is necessary to avoid the formation and expansion of gullies.
� Particular consideration should be given to the quality and purity of tree seeds and should be obtained
from the proven sources as much to improve seed germination.
4.2. Ayesha Wereda
Except for smaller deviations in nursery status and organization of livestock Marketing cooperatives, many of the
program`s activities observed in this Wereda are similar to those observed in Harshin Wereda. The mission had a
brief meeting with the Wereda project implementation team members and a debriefing session at the end of field
visit. The mission field visit has covered Alhele, Aligedi, and Dewelle PAs.
� Some of the observed encouraging climate change adaptation activities in the Wereda are: the seedling
preparation, “Diborosho”- the Livestock marketing Cooperative that has got Birr 6000 on its first round
sells without getting seed money from the MDG-F, the accomplishment of a 25m3 capacity reservoir
which is estimated to support 500 House Holds, and construction of 12 meter depth with 3meter
diameter hand dug wells.
� Though the seed money is not yet released, the LMC has started its activity. The Wereda project officer
and Wereda implementing sectors offices need to assist them in the overall processes of getting legal
certification and opening up of Bank accounts and in continuously building their capacity through the
provision of appropriate trainings particularly on marketing and cooperative management.
� The mission has identified some technical gaps in using the water tube well for irrigation. Adequate
technical support should be given to pastoralists implementing irrigation farming using water tube well that
11
are currently non-functional. Further technical backstopping from Wereda agricultural Office is very much
needed in proper seed bed preparation, using appropriate spacing for vegetable, efficient use of irrigation
water and selection of vegetables that require lower water amount in order to increase number of project
beneficiaries adapt the technology. The water tube wells are newly recommended technology considered
efficient and most suitable by the region water bureau. However, the mission feels hesitant that the new
technology need further test for the efficiency of the system because the one visited was damaged by
flood generated at the riverbank. The technology does not need big excavation and just to insert the tube
to a 12 meter depth and water is drawn by motor pumps.
� Water structures are functional and the communities are benefiting from them. However, the structures
need protection by constructing fence and embankment to prevent the constructed water schemes from
flood destruction. In addition, the WATSAN committee established at the center of each PAs for proper
handling and ownership of the resources are located very far from the water points and non-functional.
This has created gap in handling the responsibility entrusted to them.
Fig 8: Project Beneficiaries Enjoying Provision of Water in close proximity to their Village
� The animal heath posts in Ayesha that were constructed before the start-up of the project required a
substantial maintenance to resume the usual medical services to the surrounding community.
Accordingly, the project plan is to rehabilitate three health posts; but nine abandoned heath posts are
maintained, furnished and provided drug have resumed service delivery to the pastoralists based on
outreach services to undertake vaccination and treatment of diseased animals along the way.
� A considerable development and better achievement is observed at Elhallay nursery site in Ayesha
compared to that of Harshin. The changes observed in here are relatively good where over 50,0000
seedlings are raised out of the 100,000 planned for the season. Further, the mission has learned that the
remaining 50% seedling production will be achieved within a month and the planting will be done on
private holdings and enclosed rangelands. Besides that, intention to produce 50,000 additional seedlings
12
by allocated budget is encouraging. Some of the tree seedlings raised are Papaya, Acacia Abyssinica,
Schines molle (pepper tree) and local tree called Kurkura (zizipus species).
Fig 9: Partial View of a Well Managed Tree Nursery at Ayesha
� Despite the fact that over 5 hectare of rangeland has been cleared from invasive shrubs and bush
species, the recurrent drought in the area prohibited the recovery of enclosed rangelands. As a result, the
mission is unable to trace any significant changes as the result all the efforts made in developing the
rangelands in the district.
Fig 10: Recurrent Drought at Ayesha Hindered Recovery of Enclosed and Conserved Rangelands
� The mission has visited LMCs in two Kebeles of Ayesha. The first one is Diboharosha livestock marketing
cooperative comprising 15 members (9=F & 6=M) which is located at Dewele town close to Djibouti
republic border The second one is at Elehallay Kebele composed of 21 members (14=F and 7 =M).
During the discussion held with the cooperative members, the mission learnt that the members are well
organized and had good experiences in this livestock trade in their respective environment. They have
received proper training on cooperative and business management by the regional and Wereda
cooperative promotion office and the business entirely focused on buying and selling livestock’s to
meeting the local demand. As a requirement to from a cooperative and to initiate startup capital to do
13
business, the Hoden LMC at Elehallay Kebel has collected Birr 16000 from members and Diboharosha
LMC at Dewele has succeeded in collecting Birr 10,500 in total.
� The current drawback as learnt from both LMCs during the conversation fall on the legal issue that they
are still in process to obtain license. Moreover, opening bank account that enables them become eligible
to get a revolving fund from the project is the second hindrance to the cooperatives development.
Fig 11: Partial View of LMC Organized at Ayesha Wereda.
� Apparently, the Cooperatives organized in Ayesha Wereda need support to get license and open bank
account. Despite long process, some cooperatives started marketing livestock by their own contribution,
without seed money provision from the project and they also have vision of exporting livestock to Djibouti
4.3. Teletele Wereda
The visiting team has visited two PA`s, Sabba and Sarite at Teletele Wereda. Similar procedure was followed in to
brief Teltele Wereda project management committee and administration. Information on programme closure plan,
exit strategy and handover of project equipment were shared and clear understanding was created. Moreover,
aged advance problem, which was major problem of Oromia region, was discussed and agreement was reached
on urgent liquidation.
� In organizing pastoralists in Livestock Marketing cooperatives, three LMCs are organized and developed
their bylaws, opened Bankbook accounts and received legal certifications. They have received seed
money and contributed share and registration fees. The cooperatives business plan is buying cattle,
fattening and sell to the local market with the objective of market creation and income generation that
assists members and residence communities to better livestock market access.
For instance the Gerdo LMC established by 31 members (3=F & 28=M), has collected Birr 100
contribution and 20 birr registration fee from each members as a start-up capital, has legal entity, opened
bank account, constructed Office, received revolving funds amounting birr 42000 from Wereda finance
office and trained on cooperative management and marketing system that enabled them to perform best
14
in the project. So far, the LMC has bought three batches of cattle and sold twice. The total income from
the two sales is Birr 22,200 and the third batch is retained for sale for the coming holiday (Ramadan).All
income and expenditure are recorded in book of account and the income is used to expand the business
for better profit. Generally the Gerdo LMC is the most exemplary and the only best performing of all the
three cooperatives in the Wereda.
� In contrast, the Robsaba LMC that is located at Saba PA has fulfilled the essential requirements. The
members are 20 and among them seven are on leadership position. Along this work, the project has built
office and delivered office furniture where the LMC operates. Besides that, the LMC has received
revolving seed money amounting Birr 43,836 up on fulfillment of the basic requirement for cooperative.
However, the business could not generate the expected income due to problem associated with death
and loss of two cattle in the first round cattle buying and selling process. Generally, the cooperative is
capable to record income and expenditure of the business to conduct preliminary accounting to visualize
profit and loss of the business. However, it needs close follow up and regular training by the cooperative
promotion office to strengthen them and stand on their feet for better intervention in the business.
Fig 12: Third Batch of Cattle ready for sale by Gerdo LMC.
� The mission has visited two of the six income generating communities/cooperatives/ located at Sarite
Kebele. They are Jiregna Jiru Sarite Grain mill coop and Hunde Jiregna Sarite petty trade Cooperatives.
The Cooperatives are on the process of formation and do not have license as well as bank account.
One of their strength observed during consultation meeting appears that their selection capability of the
IGAs in the Kebele. There is no Grain mill or any shops for consumable goods in the locality. Secondly,
the local community needs to travel long distances to get Grain mill and consumable goods that are basic
needs of the people in the surrounding. The mission has learned the importance of establishing GM and
15
petty trade cooperatives as a profitable business venture for the Cooperative members and resolves the
surrounding people exhaustion in long distances travel in getting the services.
Thirdly, there are three level committees and one of them is conflict management committee whose duties
are to resolve any dispute that might arise in resources distribution and unnecessary misunderstanding
during business running.
Presumably, these IGA cooperatives need an extensive support from the project coordination office and
the Wereda project implementation committee in getting their license and opening of bank account for
safe start of the business.
� In connection with community water supply schemes, the mission has visited Cheri medium size pond,
Tatesa/Saba cistern /water reservoir, Sarite cistern water supply and Dalecha Bule Korma pond.
The Cheri medium size pond is located at Saba Kebele and constructed in 2011 by the community labor.
The pond has the capacity of 9530M3 and served 380 HHs or 1345 people in the Kebele.
� Before the existence of this pond, people used to fetch water from deep well constructed in their
vicinity through purchase. However, the water quality of this deep well was the most problematic
in terms of health disorder for drinking.
� The water committee composed of seven members (3women and 4 men) is set up and use the
water resources through by laws developed by the region. The pond is used exclusively for
human consumption.
� The community contribution is an important element in protecting and keeping clean the pond
from livestock and livestock through making a fence around the perimeter of the pond.
The Tatesa/Saba cistern /water reservoir is also surface rainwater harvesting techniques most often used
and implemented for medium group of people. The cistern has 55 m3 water holding capacity and capable
to provide water to 646 people in Tatesa locality. It has reduced eight hours traveling time that will spend
on water searching. Along the inlet side there is silt traps dug deep to sufficiently trap silt load from
entering to the circular closed concrete reservoir constructed underground.
� Prior the construction of the cistern the local people used to travel 7 hours to fetch water for
going and coming in all. As part of community contributions the local people constructed
traditional fence made of tree branched and bushes as a protection against human and livestock
and ensure cleanness.
16
� This water sources is a dependable resources and protected carefully at critical water need
during pick dry period.
The Sarite Cistern surface rainwater harvesting structure has similar design as Tatesa above and the
construction exclusively targeted to provide water to a rural elementary school children. The cistern is
constructed nearby school to solve the problem of drop out of students due to lack of water and to ensure
teaching and learning process to go smoothly. It also reduced 16 hours traveling time and labor needed in
search of water. Halleko Jillo, one of women beneficiary, described the problem of pregnant women in on
their way to fetch water. The beneficiaries of this cistern planned to use the harvested water as dry
season “water Security” reserve.
� The system has a medium size of 60 m3 water holding capacity located at Sarite Kebele and
provide water to 928 people including 106 pupils in the school.
� There are seven members of water committee while the committee is composed of a woman and
rests are men.
� The previous water sources needs 6 hours in all to fetch water for students and the local
community used to be exhausted by long distance travel.
Dalecha Bule Korma pond is located at Sarite Kebele with the capacity of 1357m3, which is relatively larger
in the given locality and constructed in 2011. The pond is benefiting 1798 people and for calves & weak
animals that could not travel long distances. The construction work is done by community labor.
Fig 13: One of the Most Commendable Accomplishment in Pond Construction at Teletele Wereda.
� Presumably, the beneficiaries of the water schemes in Sabba pastoral association expressed that the
construction of water ponds and cisterns have great benefit in terms of health, saved time, labor and
exhaustion due to long travel. They told the mission team that the previous water, motorized water, was hot
17
and salty in nature had various health implications on the communities. The construction of two surface ponds
with the capacity of 23100m3 and two well protected cisterns with maximum drinking water holding capacity of
115m3 are praised by the community as prominent programme component that avoided communities’ problem
of water accessibility which mostly affects women who are worn to shreds in between indoor and outdoor
commitments that are always accompanied by traveling for about 10 hours a day to fetch drinking water.
Fig 14: Saba, A Joint Field Monitoring Mission Member, Discussing the Water Quality and Access Problem with W/ro Kebebi Lumeta, Programm Beneficiary, while fetching Drinking Water.
� The other benefit of the water harvesting structures for the pastoral communities at large is the reduction in
degree of migrations in search of water for their families and their livestock. Communities are participated in
site selection, excavation, fencing and maintenance of the structures, which can be an assurance for the
sustainability of the project intervention even after the phasing over of the project. Besides that, mission has
learned that the ponds need some modification like silt trap construction and enhancing the vegetation cover
of the water shade to maximize the lifespan and ensure the sustainability of the water structures.
� In conclusion, the mission has witnessed the under listed preliminary impacts of the water harvesting
interventions of the programme.
1. Cheri medium size pond:
• From the community conversation, it is learnt that the health aspect of the water users in the
given locality has substantially improved after the deep well has been replaced by pond.
• Income of the local people has partly saved as water is collected free and does not involve any
payment.
• The water users happiness by the improvement of health, reduce exhaustion of long distance
travel and the long lasting services of the pond during the entire dry period is a specific
significance of the pond.
18
2. Tatesa/Saba cistern /water reservoir:
• The construction of the cistern in the community has increasingly built up the people confidence
to live in happiness.
• Long distances travel is avoided and time wasted in fetching water has enabled them to spend
on productive activities for better livelihood development.
• The cleanness of water also an important constituent for better health of the users.
3. Sarite cistern :
• Long travel in fetching water by the community is exclusively reduced or none for students as
the water is very close to the school.
• The surrounding people are free from exhaustion, had ample time to undertake other livelihood
development, and expressed their happiness for having water in their premises.
• The school learning process has never been interrupted by shortage of water.
• The water quality is more or less clean compared with ponds and contributed better health
situation for students and the surrounding people and currently conserved as a dependable
water source for critical time of the year.
4. Dalecha Bule Korma pond:
• Death of weak animals and calf’s due to long distances travel is significantly reduced to a great
extent and this has made this water point most significant.
• Livestock’s are provided water daily, which is reduced from 3 days before the project where
most livestock are exposed to death and fatigue.
• Water users’ confidence and happiness on the water sources created in their vicinity appears to
be the most significant achievement and important needs of the community.
• The level of awareness and understanding of community on the negative impacts of climate
change motivates them to double their effort and resilience against the shocks.
� The successful rangelands management practice that resulted in palatable fodder grasses for the pastoral
livestock triggered the communities to take heed to follow “fodder bank” development. For instance, the
Tatesa bush clearing is one of the rangelands management practice initiated by the programme. It is located
at Saba Kebele and cleared in 2011. The area covers 75 hectares and expected to serve livestock owned by
313 HHs. The Tedecha Dera bush clearing is also another rangeland rehabilitation work implemented by
Teletele Wereda. It is started in 2011 and over 90 hectare of land. In all bush-clearing sites, the cut shrubs and
bushes are carefully collected and fenced around the perimeter of the entire area with community
participation. After clearing work, the cut shrubs and bushes are burned to allow good re-growth of fodder
19
grass. This was confirmed during the field visit. The observed grass re-growth at Tatesa bush clearing site is
very encouraging and serve as important fodder bank for the community.
The area closure to rehabilitate denuded rangelands in the two Kebeles is also comprehensively done to
initiate the regeneration of grasses. So far, 125 hectare of rangeland is enclosed for rehabilitation in both two
Kebeles that exceeded the planned target (75 Ha.) by 167 %.
Fig 15: Most Exemplary Area Closed for Rehabilitating Rangeland at Teletele Wereda.
� Different plant species like Neem, Papaya, moringa species and the likes are planted at homestead of Sarite
PA. Despite the harsh environmental condition and shortage of rain fall in the locality, the local communities
have been managing and watering the trees to increase their survive rate after planting. Further, one new
Nursery site is established and soil bunds, to improve the soil moisture and control erosion, are constructed at
Teletele Wereda in connection with natural resources management and development activities.
� As to the rehabilitation of veterinary posts, the information is scanty. No sufficient information could be secured
about the maintenance or construction of vet posts. However, the mission has learned that different drugs
were supplied for the treatment of 3602 cattle, 2370 sheep, 5149 goats and 58 camels over the project period.
Over 548 households have benefited from the provision. Despite the provision of drugs to the vet posts, there
is still more work to be done in the rehabilitation of the veterinary Posts to make them more functional and
accessible to the pastoral communities.
4.4. Somali and Oromia Regions Financial Delivery Status
Based on the approved Annual Work Program (AWP) for the Year 2003 and 2004 EFY, fund disbursed and utilized
reported as of July 7, 2012 is presented below.
Financial status as of July, 2012 (Currency Birr)
UN Agencies IPs Total Disbursed
Total Utilized (Reported)
Remaining Balance (un liquidated)
Date of last Disbursement
Delivery rate %
UNDP Somali 7,314,758 4,054,016.31 3,260,741.28 June 20/2012 55.42
Oromia 1,477,636 1,470,546.73 7,089.73 March 14/2012 99.52
Sub Total 8,792,394 5,524,563 3,267,831 62.83
FAO Somali 7,648,801.07 3,803,751.27 3,845,049.80 September 7/2012 49.73
Oromia 4,962,101.40 2,324,603.91 2,637,479.49 April 19/2012 46.85
Sub Total 12,610,902.47 6,128,355.18 6,482,529.29 48.60
Grand total 21,403,296.47 11,652,918.22 9,750,360.30 54.44
Table 1: Financial status as of July, 2012.
20
5. Challenges Encountered During Implementation
5.1. Somali Region
1. Insufficient monitoring of the programme progress was critical challenges of the Wereda focal persons
due to lack of transport facilities. The procured Motorcycles by UNDP are still within the custody of the
dealer in Addis Ababa. Even though the Somali region has attempted to collect the motorcycles by
covering custom fees, the effort could not be completed in spite of two attempts made due to miss
understanding between United Packers (commissioned agent) and the Somali delegation. At one time
payment by cash was suggested by the United Packers and was refused by the customs Office. Once
again, the regional LCNRD Bureau has attempted to cover the custom fee in CPO and this attempt was
failed due to misunderstanding between the bureau’s delegate and the custom clearing agent.
2. Insufficient and irregular monitoring of the projects progress by the WPIT members has a significant
impact in timely completion of the executed projects. The issue has been raised in all consultation and
wrap up meeting and this has been agreed by the respective members and promised to do everything as
recommended by the mission.
3. Delay of fund transfer from the partners is also a standing problem that was allegedly raised in all
meetings. This issue has been discussed several time that the demands of the UN agencies are so
cumbersome. Since the liquidation of advance made to the region is a prerequisite to obtain the
subsequent advance, it is agreed that the requirements of the funding UN agencies must be respected to
ensure the subsequent transfer.
4. Some of the water schemes are found not speeding as planned in the 3rd quarter and this has triggered
concerns to speed up implementation considering the remaining project life. The Wereda project
implementation teams need to work hand to hand with the regional coordination offices to speed-up
construction of the water schemes.
5. Even though the Livestock marketing cooperative members are so initiated and have shown strong
interest to establish LMC, the support provided from the regional cooperative promotion office is still very
loose. The LMC need close follow up, regular training and assistances in having licenses and opening
Bank account to be eligible for the revolving funds which is already in Wereda finance office account.
There are also few cooperative that are not established to date and needs a concerted effort of both the
WPIT and the regional coordination office.
6. It is also noted that the proposed joint monitoring of the regional and Wereda sector offices is very much
limited and insufficient as well. Regular monitoring into the project sites has critical significance as far as
the Environment JP is concerned.
7. Quarter financial reports could not be received as per the requirements of the FAO in time and this has
substantially delayed fund transfer and information to see the progress of the programme.
21
5.2. Oromia Region
1. Although three livestock marketing cooperatives are established to their very best as compared to the
Somali region, there are three more to be established, licensed and open bank account very soon or in
few weeks’ time.
2. The gap observed in technical capacity to manage the established cooperatives and delayed seed money
transfer are very critical. The Wereda implementation team together, project officer and cooperative
promotion office need to work jointly in assisting the cooperative to become more productive and help
them to getting seed money.
3. Only two of the six IGA cooperative are partly set up and thus all the six IGA cooperatives require the
assistances of the WPIT and concerned line offices for quick establishment, obtaining license and bank
account and getting seed money very urgently.
4. No water works has been accomplished in 2004EFY due to lack of fund, which is accounted to the
region’s inability to liquidate aged advance. In 2004EFY, four ponds, one dam and two cisterns are
expected to be constructed before the onset of the rainy season. Besides that, the pond and cisterns,
constructed by the Oromia water works – SORDU, are not completed in time. There is still remaining
construction and maintenance work to be done. Obliviously the inefficiency stem from the contracted
company who could not meet the dead line as agreed. The dam at Saba Kebele has serious design
problem that hindered collection of sufficient rainwater.
5. Even though some effort has been done in this area of Vet post rehabilitation and provision of drugs and
furniture, still more work is needed in rehabilitating the veterinary Posts to make them more functional
and accessible to the pastoral communities.
6. The monitoring mechanism so far on the ground by the WPIT has been very loose. The fund allocated for
monitoring is unutilized and it seems that the WPMC are not aware of this due to frequent turnover of staff
at the leadership level.
7. Way Forward and Recommendation
In general, the joint field monitoring and technical backstopping mission has resulted in:
• Clear understanding among mission team and implementing partners on the status of the joint programme
• Updated data on progresses, shared information and identified technical backstopping needs.
• Agreement on the milestones of project deliverables and on set deadlines to accomplish the remaining activities
• Reached consensus on the way forward to speed up the project implementation within remaining project period
• Learned lessons from project results that can be promoted and shared as good practices.
• Drawn best practices to advocate the programme and to share it with national and international communities.
22
In line with the mission field monitoring findings and encountered challenges, the way forward and
recommendation are as follows;
1. Deliver proper reports and documents on the executed activities so far including the assessment carried
in each Wereda and design and specifications prepared on the earthen dam construction under process
2. Technical support from concerned implementing partners should be strengthened and continued to further
speed up the implementation of the Spanish MDG-F environment joint programme.
3. Wereda administration and project management committee should pay due attention to finalize the
remaining project activities on the scheduled period. Since the project life span is getting shorter and
shorter, the remaining activities need integrated and fast action and decision. Particularly the established
cooperatives want strong support and follow up from Wereda project management committee to get
license and to open bank account with in short period of time.
4. The water committee that established at Kebele level, in Somali region, should be devolved toward the
direct user community of water structure. They also need close supervision and follow up to strengthen
their responsibility.
5. The type of seedling should be diversified to include more fruit trees which have both environmental (used
as shade, wind break, regulate local climate, prevent run off….) and livelihood (used as food, cash crop
and so on) benefits. This will enhance income of the pastoral communities and serve as climate change
adaptation mechanism.
6. Some water structures need strong rehabilitation and regional government commitment. Particularly the
dam that is constructed by SORDU need rehabilitation of inlet structure and constructing stabilizing
structures to reduce massive silt load in the dam. If urgent action is not taken in time the lifespan of the
dam is heavily jeopardized.
7. The tax payment issue and distribution of motor cycles should be handled urgently. UNDP should follow
up the issue and share precise information with regions. The delegated persons would have contact the
PCO and UNDP before getting back to the region.
8. The climate change adaptation programme was finalized at all region and federal level. However, all
project Weredas in Somali and Oromia regions do not have adaptation programme document. Therefore,
EPA should finalize the climate change adaptation programme at Wereda level, particularly in Somali
region.
9. The government should start preparation to scale up the findings of the pilot environment joint programme
to other similar areas.
10. The UN agencies in collaboration with Ethiopian government should pay due attention to raise fund and
upscale implement similar the climate change adaptation programme in pastoral area of the country.
23
11. The Wereda and regional IPs need to take time to conduct periodic survey, periodic monitoring as well as
to keep progress record on LMC, IGA, rangeland management and water harvesting practices.
12. The need to scale up the range lands rehabilitation practices that are proven successful in Teletele area
into other pastoral areas in wide area enclosures basis.
13. Closer monitoring for those LMCs that started trade in livestock for diversifying their income in ways that
fit with market creations for members and non-members and their families demand for consumption and
getting fare benefits.
14. Construction / rehabilitation of water facilities require fast response both from the project implementer
and the donor as well to complete before the onset of short rain ”Hagaya” which is common in mid-
September, 2012.
15. Availing transport facilities, motorbike as per the project agreement will help to complete the planned
activities timely; this may also enhance and motivate the workers.
16. Needs to create common understanding between supporting office (WMMD) and others about the project
or programme that needs willingness and readiness to provide/ support the necessary inputs.
17. Provide further awareness to all direct and indirect beneficiaries of the project about adaptation to climate
change and mitigation measures. Meanwhile, building adaptive social protection and ecosystem resilience
through enhancing and securing pastoralists access to strategic resources (such as range and water) is
basic and essential if they are to adequately prepare and effectively respond to the effects of climate
change.
18. EPA should resolve the problem associated with budget utilization allocated for Wereda Climate Change
adaptation action plan preparation and finalize for Ayesha, Harshin and Teletele Weredas urgently.
19. All visited Weredas and regions should act in accordance with the recommendations of this mission report
and complete the accomplishments before September 10, 2012.
24
8. List of Contacts Made in the Region and Project Weredas
No Participant's Name Representation Position
1 Jamal Abdi Kalif Harshin Wereda Administration Head Acting
2 Suhur Ahmed Harshin Wereda women's Affairs Office Head
Permanent
3 Dayib aw Ahmed Harshin Wereda Revenue Office Head Acting
4 Ahmed Mohamed Hasen Harshin Werada Disaster Prevention and Preperdness office Head
Permanent
5 Dek Dubad Harshin Werada Party office Head Permanent
6 Ahmed Sheeq Harshin Werada Police Administrator Permanent
7 Jama Shek-Mohamud Harshin WoFED Head Acting
8 Isle Osman Harshin Wereda Education Office Head Acting
9 Abdurahman Buh Harshin Wereda Health Office Head Acting
10 Mohamed Hassen Elmi Harshin Wereda Livestock, Crop & Rural dev't Head
Acting
11 Mohamed Jama Harshin MDG-F JP Wereda Officer Permanent
12 Ugas Ade Abdilahi Harshin Werada party -Public Relations head
Permanent
13 Abdi Faysal Ismael Muhumed
Harshin Wereda Youth and Sport Office Head
Permanent
14 Yusuf Hussein Ayesha Wereda Administration office head Acting
15 Abdi Hakim Hassen Ayesha WoFED Head Acting
16 Tesfaye Sewnet Ayesha Werada Education office Head Acting
17 Mathwos Habte Ayesha Wereda Health Office Head Acting
18 Jawhara Farah Ayesha Women's Affairs Office Head Permanent
19 Mohamed hassen Ayesha Wereda Water Bureau Office Head Acting
20 Abdurazak Yusuf Ayesha Wereda Justice office Head Permanent
21 Guyo Bule Teletele Wereda administration Delegate
22 Muhammed Shako Teletele Wereda MDG-F JP Project officer
23 Zinabu Sintayehu Teletele Wereda Water Office Delegate
24 Kasaye Bedessa Teletele Wereda FED office Deputy head
25 Molu Jarso Teletele Wereda education Office Delegate
26 Luka Haile Teletele Wereda Rural land Administration Delegate
27 Abdurahman Kassim Teletele Wereda Rural Road Office Delegate
28 Jaldessa Galgalo Teletele Wereda Public Affairs Office Head
29 Abdi Aman Teletele Wereda
30 Abdulfarah Mahabub Teletele Wereda PAC Office Finance officer
31 Belayeneh Gezahagn Teletele Wereda Gov. Affairs Office Head
32 Yohannis Bogale Teletele Wereda Mobilizatio Bureau Head
33 Guyo Muro Teletele Wereda Land admin. & Environment Protection Office
Process Owner