bags, batteries and boxes: a qualitative interview study

26
Preprint, which differs from the published version in small ways. Final version available as: Christopher James Vincent, Ann Blandford, Bags, batteries and boxes: A qualitative interview study to understand how syringe drivers are adapted and used by healthcare staff, Applied Ergonomics, Volume 63, September 2017, Pages 115-122, ISSN 0003-6870, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.04.012. Bags, batteries and boxes: A qualitative interview study to understand how syringe drivers are adapted and used by healthcare staff C. J. Vincent & A. Blandford Abstract Syringe drivers are medical devices that are critical for end of life care. They deliver continuous medication over extended periods of time. Their design contributes to the quality of experience for both patients and healthcare professionals. Little research has been published about the factors that influence the usability of this type of equipment for frontline users (i.e. those in direct contact with patients) and how equipment gets introduced. Understanding how syringe drivers are used in practice can help improve the design of equipment. 27 semi-structured interviews were conducted across acute hospitals, community hospitals and hospices (4 organisations in total). All participating organisations used the same type of syringe driver. It was found that frontline staff needed to adapt this equipment to fit the circumstances of use. The analysis provided examples of this happening for aspects relating to the appearance of the device (bags), accessories (batteries) and security (the lockable box). Keywords: Interface, User Computer; Purchasing; Medical Device Design; Palliative Care; Introduction Syringe drivers are widely used for palliative care. These devices are compact boxes that are typically powered by a battery and can be left unattended by healthcare staff. Although patients rely on the effective functioning of these devices for pain relief and have to integrate them into their lives, and although the devices are often left running without professional oversight, there have been no prior studies of how they are used, or of how professionals adapt the devices to address their patients’ needs and to remain safe. This paper reports on a study of how equipment gets adapted (e.g. the reconfigurations that occur to support use) and relates this to the process of introducing equipment (purchasing). This builds on a previous paper that reports how those involved in purchasing syringe drivers go about evaluating usability, the challenges that arise, and opportunities for improvement (Vincent and Blandford, 2017).

Upload: others

Post on 04-Dec-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Preprint,whichdiffersfromthepublishedversioninsmallways.Finalversionavailableas: Christopher James Vincent, Ann Blandford, Bags, batteries and boxes: A qualitative interview study to understand how syringe drivers are adapted and used by healthcare staff, Applied Ergonomics, Volume 63, September 2017, Pages 115-122, ISSN 0003-6870, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.04.012.

Bags,batteriesandboxes:AqualitativeinterviewstudytounderstandhowsyringedriversareadaptedandusedbyhealthcarestaffC.J.Vincent&A.BlandfordAbstractSyringedriversaremedicaldevicesthatarecriticalforendoflifecare.Theydelivercontinuousmedicationoverextendedperiodsoftime.Theirdesigncontributestothequalityofexperienceforbothpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals.Littleresearchhasbeenpublishedaboutthefactorsthatinfluencetheusabilityofthistypeofequipmentforfrontlineusers(i.e.thoseindirectcontactwithpatients)andhowequipmentgetsintroduced.Understandinghowsyringedriversareusedinpracticecanhelpimprovethedesignofequipment.27semi-structuredinterviewswereconductedacrossacutehospitals,communityhospitalsandhospices(4organisationsintotal).Allparticipatingorganisationsusedthesametypeofsyringedriver.Itwasfoundthatfrontlinestaffneededtoadaptthisequipmenttofitthecircumstancesofuse.Theanalysisprovidedexamplesofthishappeningforaspectsrelatingtotheappearanceofthedevice(bags),accessories(batteries)andsecurity(thelockablebox).Keywords:Interface,UserComputer;Purchasing;MedicalDeviceDesign;PalliativeCare;

IntroductionSyringedriversarewidelyusedforpalliativecare.Thesedevicesarecompactboxesthataretypicallypoweredbyabatteryandcanbeleftunattendedbyhealthcarestaff.Althoughpatientsrelyontheeffectivefunctioningofthesedevicesforpainreliefandhavetointegratethemintotheirlives,andalthoughthedevicesareoftenleftrunningwithoutprofessionaloversight,therehavebeennopriorstudiesofhowtheyareused,orofhowprofessionalsadaptthedevicestoaddresstheirpatients’needsandtoremainsafe.Thispaperreportsonastudyofhowequipmentgetsadapted(e.g.thereconfigurationsthatoccurtosupportuse)andrelatesthistotheprocessofintroducingequipment(purchasing).Thisbuildsonapreviouspaperthatreportshowthoseinvolvedinpurchasingsyringedriversgoaboutevaluatingusability,thechallengesthatarise,andopportunitiesforimprovement(VincentandBlandford,2017).

ThereplacementofoldertypesofambulatorysyringedriverAcrosstheUK,mostpalliativecareprovidersusethesametypeofsyringedriver(forahistorysee(GrahamandClark,2005)).Thedeviceisusedtotreatpatientswhentheycannottakeoralmedication.Itcanbeusedtocontrolsymptomsandprovidepainrelief.Palliativecarecommonlyinvolvestheuseofanambulatorysyringedriver.Thisisbecausepatientsmaybemobilewhilstusingthedevice.Thecurrentambulatorydevicereplacedanolderpieceofequipment(reviewedin(Oliver,1988))thatwaswithdrawnduetoconcernsaboutalackofcontrol,difficultyinuseandpotentialforerror.ThereplacementfollowedthereleaseofaRapidResponseReport(RRR),detailingthepotentialforconfusiontoarisewhensettingtherate.“Whilethemajorityofsyringedriversandpumpsusedinhealthcarehaveratesettingsinmillilitres(ml),someoldertypesofambulatorysyringedrivershaveratesettingsinmillimetres(mm)ofsyringeplungertravel.Thisisnotintuitiveformanyusersandnoteasytocheck.”(NPSA,2010)Althoughtherewasaneedtoreplacetheoldequipment,therewasalimitedchoiceinthemarketplace;sometrustsreportedthattheyhadlittlechoicebuttouseasingletypeoftechnology.Thefocusofthisstudyisonthewaysinwhichtheequipmentwasadaptedforuseacrossmultiplesettings(acutehospitals,communityhospitals,hospicesandhomes),andhowthisrelatestotheoriginalprocessofintroducingit.Thecircumstancessurroundingtheintroductionofthisequipmentprovideanopportunitytolearnhowtheneedsofmultiplelocalorganisationscouldhavebeenmet,basedonthecapabilitiesofagenericpieceoftechnology.

Equipmentreplacementandsocio-technicalsystems(STS)Thesyringedriverwasprovidedwithanagreeddefaultconfiguration(asrecommendedinNPSA,2004).Thismeansthatthefunctionalityandappearanceofthedeviceisthesameregardlessofwherethedeviceisbeingused.However,inthisdomainthenatureofworkischaracterisedbyrelativelysmallgroupsofindividualsactingindependently,indifferentways,acrossdifferentsettings(seeTable1).Thenursessetup,activateandreplenishthedriversindividuallybutarepartofalargerteamthatdevelopsasharedviewonpractice.Forexamplesomenursesmayusethesyringedriverbatterycompartmentlidtoleveroutthebattery.Thisisnotdescribedintheinstructionmanualandreflectsalocalvariationinuse.Suchvariationmaybearesultofaninsightthathasbeensharedwithinagrouporaresponsetoaspecificchallengethatagroupfaces.Forexampleifasyringedriverisusedoutdoorsthenprotectionmaybeaddedtokeepthedevicedry.Ifalargevolumeofsolutionisrequiredthentwodevicesmaybeused.Ifthedeviceisusedwithchildren,aparentmaybeaskedtoperformsimilarcheckstoaclinician(e.g.checkingthatthedeviceisrunning).

Table1:Differentenvironmentsofuse

Environment Useofdevicebyhealthcareprofessional

Customisation

Home Nursevisitshometoset-up/replenishdevice.Devicekeptinalockbox.Deviceleftunattended.Nurseneedstotraveltoattendtopatientordevice.

Deviceusedwithlockbox.Devicesometimesusedwithbag.Staffneedtocheckthelevelofpowerinthebatteryandmaykeepspares.Theappearanceofthedeviceshouldreflectthehomeenvironment.

CommunityHospital

Inthisstudythecommunityhospitalwasusedasahubforthenursesworkinginpatienthomes.

N/A

Hospice Nursecheckspumponaregularbasis.Devicekeptinalockbox.Devicemayormaynotbeattended.

Deviceusedwithlockbox.Devicemaybepositionedunderabedorunderpillow.Thedevicemaybeusedwithadockingstation/externalpowersupply.Thedeviceneedstosupportregularchecks/monitoring.

AcuteHospital Nursecheckspumponaregularbasis.Devicekeptinalockbox.Devicelikelytobeattended.Devicemaybesubstitutedwithanothertype.Devicetrainingprovidedbytrainingstaffworkinginthehospital.

Deviceusedwithlockbox.Deviceispartofacentrallymanagedequipmentlibrary.Devicepositionedatbedside.Thedevicecouldbeusedwithadockingstation/externalpowersupply.Thedeviceneedstosupportregularchecks/monitoring.

Inthiswayteamsfindtheirownwaysofworkinginordertopromoteefficiencyandjobsatisfaction.Optimisationoccursbeyondtheleveloftheindividualbutwithintheleveloftheteam(TristandBamforth,1951;Tristetal.,1963).Thistopicisveryrelevantforhealthcareasthereisadebaterelatingtothebenefitsthatcustomisationprovides(ObradovichandWoods,1996),andlittleattentionhasbeenpaidtohowwellthepracticesofcustomisingfitwithwiderprocessesandcontrols,forexamplethemedicaldeviceregulationsthatseektodefinenormalconditionsofusewhichremainconstantovertime(Randell,2003).Forexample(asinthiscase),theequipmentmaybeintroducedinaverygenericway(e.g.mandatedbyanoverarchingbody);however,socio-technicalsystemstheory(STS)suggeststhattheremaybebenefitsinsmallergroupsadaptingandtakingresponsibilityforit(e.g.theprincipleofresponsibleautonomy(Amble,2013)).Inthehomecareenvironmentthiscouldinvolvecustomisingthedevicetomakeitlookdiscreet(O'Kaneetal.,2015).Inthehospitalcontextequipmentcouldbemodifiedbeyondtheoriginaldesignintent,asperaccountsrelatingtobarcodingsystems(Koppeletal.,2008),alarmsettings(Watsonetal.,2004),physiologicalmonitors(CookandWoods,1996)infusionpumps(ObradovichandWoods,1996)andglucometers(Furnissetal.,2015).Indomainsotherthanhealthcare(e.g.software),theliteraturegenerallypaintsapositivepictureregardingtheroleofadaptationandcustomisation.Adaptationcanbebrokendownintothreecategories.Userscanchangethestructureofworktoaccommodatenewtechnology[fitting],theycanworkaroundwhatthey

seeasmisalignments;andtheycanaugmentworkinlightofnewtechnology(Gasser,1986).Thesebehavioursareseenasavehicleforimprovingpracticeandconfrontingtheproblemsthatcanariseovertime(Mackay,1990;Rogers,1994).Changescanbeacknowledged,fedintodesignandusedtoinformfuturegenerationsoftechnology.Researchisrequiredtounderstandtheprocessof“mutualadaptationbetweentoolandcontext”(BiksonandEveland,1996)asfindingsaffecthowequipmentismanaged(e.g.embracingcustomisationorseekingtoavoidit)andthegeneralapproachtointroduction.Forexample,someofthesebehavioursmightcreateadditionalrisks.ObradovichandWoods(1996)statethatwhenconsideredinabroadercontextadaptationsmaybebrittle,produceunanticipatedsideeffectsorcreatenewpathstofailure.AmorepositiveaccountisprovidedbyCookandWoods(1996)–e.g.“systemtailoringclearlyenhancessomeaspectsofperformance”;however,thereremainsuncertaintyaroundthebenefitthatcustomisationprovidesandhowitshouldbemanaged.Thissituationiscomplicatedbythedifferenttypesofmodificationthatcanoccur.Randell(2003)givesexamplesofdifferenttypesofmedicaldevicecustomisation,including:thoseaimingtoovercomelimitations(e.g.shorttermsolutionssuchasresettingadevice);thoseaimingtoprovideforeaseofuse(penandpaperadaptations);andthosethatchangeproceduresaroundtechnology.Thedifferenttypesofadaptationcanresultinvaryingbenefits,integratewithexistingprocessestovaryingdegreesandmayormaynotbeproductive.Thereisthereforeadegreeofuncertaintyabouthowadaptationoccursandwhatbenefititprovides.Forpalliativecare,therehavebeennoaccountsofthistypeofbehaviour.Thisstudycomplementsexistingunderstandingregardingthesafeandefficientuseofsyringedrivers(Costelloetal.,2008;Cruickshanketal.,2010;McCormacketal.,2001;West,2014);itcanalsoinformtheapproachtothefutureintroductionoftechnology.Forexample,investigationfocusedonaspecifictypeoftechnologycanbeusedtobuildtheoriesoutliningtherelationshipbetweenuser-deviceinteractionsandsystemwideconsequences(forexampletechnologyacceptance)asin(Sharplesetal.,2012).Ifweunderstandthetypesofmodificationthatoccurtosupportproductivitywecandesign,integrateandmanagetechnologyinawaythatsupportspatientsandhealthcarestaff.Aholisticview(understandinginteractionsbetweenpeople,technology,tasks,organisationsandenvironment)helpsprovideasaferandmoreproductiveworkplace(SmithandCarayon,1989)andframeworkssuchasSEIPS(theSystemsEngineeringInitiativeforPatientSafety)showthebenefitofsuchanapproach(Carayon,2009;Carayonetal.,2006;CarayonandSmith,2000;Carayonetal.,2014).Inthecontextofthisstudy,understandingthesebroaderrelationshipspotentiallyimpactsonthetheoriesthatunderpinthedesignofmedicaltechnologywiththeconsequencethatbettertoolscanbeprovided.

Overviewoftheresearchsetting

IntheUK,thehomeenvironmentisthepreferredlocationforendoflifecare.Inthiscasehealthcareprofessionalssetupasyringedriveranditisleftwiththepatientandcheckeddaily.Ifthereareanyproblemswiththedevicethenthepatientorfamilymembercancontactanurse.Thesyringedrivercanalsobeusedinanin-patientsetting(forexamplewithinahospiceorcommunityhospital),assummarisedinTable1.Inthesecasesthedrivercanbecheckedatregularintervals(forexampleeveryhouroreveryfourhours);thefrequencydependsonthetypeofhospitalandwardinwhichthetreatmentisbeingadministered.Ifusedinanacutehospital,thearrangementsaresimilar;however,managementofthedeviceoverlapswiththewiderprocessinthehospital(e.g.managedaspartofacentralisedequipmentlibrary).Thesedifferentlocationsprovidecontrastingfocusesofstudy,andmakeitmorelikelythatadegreeofcustomisationwillberequireddependentonthelocation(seeTable1).Ifastandardpieceofequipmentisintroducedthenitcanbehardtosatisfyuserneedsacrossallofthesedifferentcontexts(e.g.,shoulditbemadetolooklikeapieceofmedicalequipmentorashoulditbedesignedtoblendintothehomeenvironment)?Theneedforcustomisationasdefinedisthereforeanimportanttopicforinvestigation;ononehandlimitingcustomisationofferspotentialsafetybenefits(controlandconsistency),ontheotherhanditrisksprovidingatoolthatdoesnotmeettheneedsofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals.

MethodsAqualitativeinterviewstudyinvolvingNHSstaffwasconductedbasedonthefollowingprocedure.

ProcedureThestudyinvolvedsemi-structuredinterviews(27participantsacrossanacutehospital,acommunityhospital,ahospiceandatrustoffice[forcommunitycare]).Acutehospitalsandcommunityhospitalsaredifferentintermsofthesizeofthefacility(communityhospitalsaresmaller),rangeofproceduresthatcanoccurandwayinwhichequipmentismanaged.ParticipantsacrossmultiplesiteswerecontactedviaaregionalClinicalResearchNetwork(CRN)andwereapproachedinparallel.Allinterviewsfocusedontheintroductionanduseoftheaforementionedsyringedriver,withtheaimofbetterunderstandingtheirworkpractices.Datawereanalysedusingthematicanalysis,aqualitativemethoddesignedtosupporttheidentification,analysisandreportingofpatterns(themes)(BraunandClarke,2006).Themethodwaschosen,asitisindependentoftheoryandoffersaflexibleandaccessibleapproachtotheanalysisofqualitativedata.Ethicalpermissionwasobtainedviaauniversitydepartmentalresearchethicscommittee.AdditionalpermissionswereobtainedaspertheHealthResearchAuthority(HRA)processforaqualitativestudyinvolvingstaffintheUKNationalHealthService(i.e.researchgovernancewasgrantedbythehealthcaretrustsinvolvedinthestudy).Alldatawereanonymised.Thestudywasbasedononeoftwotopicguides,suchthatquestionswerechosenbasedonthecircumstancesoftheparticipant(Table2).Wherepossible,theyweretailoredtoaparticipant,bothintermsofthetopicguidethatwaschosenandthedecisiontoomitquestionsthatwerenotrelevant.Thetopicguidewaschosenpriortotheinterviewbasedontheextenttowhichtheparticipanthadbeeninvolvedintheintroductionorpurchasingofthesyringedriver.Foroneguide(purchasers),interviewsaddressed7topics,basedaroundtheequipmentlifecycle,withanemphasisonevaluatingequipmentduringpurchasing(Table3).Fortheotherguide(deviceusers),theinterviewsaddressed5topics;lessemphasiswasplacedonthepurchasingofequipmentandmoreontheexperienceofuse(Table4).Twotopicguideswerenecessaryasnotalluserswereinvolvedinpurchasing.Theresultsreportedinthispaperdrawmainlyontheinterviewsconductedusingthetopicguidefordeviceusers.Bothtopicguidesaimedtobalancetheneedforbrevitywhilstfocusingpotentialinsight.Theguidescontainedadefaultplanfortheinterviews,buttopicscouldbecoveredinadifferentorder,dependingonhowparticipantsresponded.

Informedconsentwascollectedfromparticipants.Allparticipantsagreedtointerviewsbeingaudiorecorded.Theaudiorecorderwasclearlyvisibletoparticipantsduringinterviews.Picturesofequipmentoraccessoriesweretakenwithpermissionofthosewhowereinvolved.Table2:Participants

Profile Topicguide

Organisation Profile Involvementinpurchasing

1 Deviceusers

Hospice Communitypractitioner(teamlead)

L

2 Deviceusers

Hospice Staffnurse L

3 Deviceusers

Hospice Districtnurse L

4 Deviceusers

Hospice Hospicemanager L

5 Deviceusers

Hospice Staffnurse L

6 Deviceusers

Hospice Staffnurse L

7 Deviceusers

Hospice Staffnurse L

8 Deviceusers

Communityhospital Clinicalnursespecialist

L

9 Deviceusers

Communityhospital Clinicalnursespecialist

L

10 Deviceusers

Communityhospital Clinicalnursespecialist

M

11 Purchasers Communityhospital Clinicalnursespecialist

H

12 Deviceusers

Communityhospital Nurse L

13 Deviceusers

Communityhospital Nurse-teamlead L

14 Deviceusers

Communityhospital Macmillannurse M

15 Deviceusers

Communityhospital Assistantpractitioner M

16 Deviceusers

Communityhospital Macmillannurse L

17 Purchasers Acutehospital Palliativecarenursespecialist

M

18 Purchasers Acutehospital Consultantforpalliativecare

H

19 Deviceusers

Acutehospital Medicaldeviceeducator

M

20 Deviceusers

Acutehospital Chargenurse M

21 Deviceusers

Acutehospital Staffnurse;wardmanager

M

22 Deviceusers

Acutehospital Staffnurse L

23 Deviceusers

Acutehospital Nursegeneralmedicalward

M

Profile Topicguide

Organisation Profile Involvementinpurchasing

24 Purchasers Acutehospital Palliativecarespecialist

H

25 Purchasers Trust(communityrole)

End-of-lifecarefacilitator

H

26 Deviceusers

Trust(communityrole)

Endoflifecarefacilitator

M

27 Deviceusers

Trust(communityrole)

Pharmaceuticalmedicinesinformation,educationandtraining

M

NOTE:Involvementinpurchasing:L=Low:verylittleornoinvolvement,M=Medium:limitedinvolvement(e.g.providingfeedback),H=High:substantialinvolvement.

Table3:Interviewtopicsforthoseinvolvedinpurchasing

Topic Description RepresentativequestionT1:PersonalBackground

Intervieweeroleandresponsibility.

Whatisyourjob,whatdoesitinvolve,howlonghaveyoubeendoingitforandwhatisyourbackground/experience?

T2:ExamplePurchasingProject

Examplepurchasingprojectincluding,trigger,whowasinvolved,intendeduser,needfornewequipment.

Iwouldlikeyoutotellmeaboutarecentpurchasingprojectrelatingtoaninfusiondevice.[promptswherenecessary]

T3:Process

Awareness,interpretation,utilityandrelevanceofpurchasingguidelines,processandauthority.

Didyoufollowanagreedprocess?

T4:BudgetandSelection

Cost,leasing,purchasingoptions.

Whatbudgetwastheequipmentpurchasedonandwhy?

T5:AdviceonEquipmentInteractivity

Awarenessofsourcesofsupportredeviceinteractivity.

Whodidyougotoforadviceonthesuitabilityoftheequipment?

T6:IntroductionofEquipment

Phasedvincrementalintroduction,lengthofprocess.

Wasthereaphasedintroductionoftheequipmentordiditgetdeployedinonego?

T7:Agreement,ReconciliationandExpectations

Reachingaconsensus,trade-offs,outcomevexpectation,whatdid/didnotworkwell.

Dideveryoneagreeonyourchosensolution?

Table4:Interviewtopicsforthoseaffectedbypurchasingdecisionsoninfusiondevices(i.e.,users)

Topic Description RepresentativequestionT1:PersonalBackground

Intervieweeroleandresponsibility.

Whatisyourjob,whatdoesitinvolve,howlonghaveyoubeendoingitforandwhatisyourbackground/experience?

T2:DevicesUsed

Exampleofaninfusiondevicethattheyused;namingconventions;contextofuse;alternativedevices.

Iwouldlikeyoutotellmeaboutthetypesofinfusiondevicethatyouuse.

T3:InvolvementinPurchasing

Experiencesofbeinginvolvedinthepurchasingoftheinfusiondevice,and/orrecollectionofintroduction.

Wereyouinvolvedinthepurchasing/selectionofthedevice?Ifsopleasedescribewhathappened?

T4:SuitabilityofEquipment.

Likes/dislikes,needs,issues,comparisonswithotherequipment.

Isit[thedevice]suitableforthejobthatyouaredoing?

T5:NetworksandAdvice

Awarenessofsourcesofsupportandadvice;influencesonselection.

Whowouldyougotoforadviceonthedevice?

Codingprocess

Analysiswasconductedafterallinterviewswerecomplete.DatafrominterviewsweretranscribedandloadedintoATLAS.ti(ScientificSoftwareDevelopmentGmbH).Atlas.tiisqualitativedataanalysissoftware.Transcriptsaresystematicallyanalysedtouncoverthephenomenathatarecontainedwithindata.Thisoccursthroughaprocessofcodingandannotationwheretheinterviewtranscriptsarestudiedandsectionsofcontentlabelled(coded)inordertodeterminerelationshipsandthemes.Thesoftwaresupportsthematicanalysis(BraunandClarke,2006),anapproachchosenbecauseitbalancestheneedforrigourwithflexibilitytoallowforarangeofpatternsandphenomenatoemerge.Thematicanalysishasbeensuccessfullyusedtoaccountforphenomenaunderpinningmedicaldevicedesign,development,purchasinganduse(e.g.(Cafazzoetal.,2012;Moneyetal.,2011;Vincentetal.,2014));wewereexpectingtheanalysistoprovideasimilardegreeofinsightinthiscase.Aspartofthethematicanalysis,thefirstauthorconductedaprocessofinductivecoding.Inductivecodingisaprocessthatinvolveslabellingpartsofthetranscript(typicallyoneortwosentences)withaheadingsuchas“training”.Theselabels(orcodes)arecombinedtoformpatternsofresponseormeaning.Thismeansthatthefindingsemergedfromthedata–i.e.therewasnopre-conceivedhypothesis.Overprogressiveinterviews,thecodeswerecombined,revisedandsimplified(asinphasethreeof(BraunandClarke,2006)).Transcriptswereanalysedsuccessivelyintheorderoftheinterviews.Ameasureofthenumberofcodesgeneratedatvaryingpointsintheanalysiswastaken(seesupplementarydata).Thisdeterminedthedegreetowhichthecodingsetwascomplete.Forexample,iftheprocessofreadingatranscriptgeneratednonewinsightthennonewcodeswouldbeproduced.Monitoringthenumberofcodesenabledconsiderationofthecostofadditionalanalysisversustheutilityofthelikelyinsight.Whentheanalysiswascomplete84codeshadbeendefined.Thegenerationofnewcodesreachedaplateaufrominterview17onwards(27transcriptswereanalysed),givingconfidencethatsaturationhadbeenreached.Thisisinlinewithotherstudies(Guestetal.,2006).

ResultsInallcases,thesyringedriverhadbeenusedforsometime(morethanayear).Duetothevariedcontextsinwhichthedevicewasused,therehadbeenaneedtotailorthedeviceaccordingtolocalcircumstances.Theintroductionofagenerictechnologycouldonlygosofarinanticipatingtheneedsofthoseworkingindifferentenvironments(home,hospice,communityhospital,acutehospital).Therewasaneedtorespondtothedifferentenvironmentsinwhichthedevicewasusedandadjustaccordingly.Thiswasunderthecontrolofthefrontlinestaff.Threethemesemerged;theyrelatedtoaprocessofcustomisation

inwhichstaffmodifiedtheappearanceofthedevice(e.g.byusingbagsorpillowstodisguisethedevice),selectiveuseofcertainaccessories(e.g.batteriesandsyringes)anddevicesecurity(usewithinalockbox).Resultsarediscussedintermsoftheirimpactonthewaythatequipmentisintroducedandmanaged.AssociatedquotationsareprovidedinTable5(indexedbyanOBS[observation]referenceasprovidedinthemaintext).

TheuseofbagsandpillowstodisguisethedeviceParticipantsweresensitivetothereactionofthepatient,friendsandfamilytothesightofthesyringedriver.Staffreportedtheirconcernsthatotherswouldthinkthatbyprovidingasyringedriverendoflifewasgoingtooccursoon.Theappearanceofthedevicewasbeingchangedordisguised.Thiscouldoccurbyplacingitinacustommadebagorbyhidingitinotherways.Thisvarieddependentonthelocationandcircumstancesbutwasobservedacrossmultiplesites.Forexample,ifusedinanin-patient(hospital)setting,staffconcealedthedeviceordisguiseditunderapillowsothatitdidnotupsetvisitorsorremindthepatientoftheirtreatment.Inthiscasethepatientwasgenerallybedbound.Staffreportedtheneedforquietanddiscreetequipment,withthecaveatthatthepatientdidnotforgetthattheywereattachedtothedevice.Somepatientswouldusethedeviceinhospitalwhilstmobile.Inthiscasestaffdisguiseditbyplacingitinadisposablebagwhichmatchedthepatient’sclothing.Thiscouldhelpconcealthedeviceandavoidmakingitapparenttofamilyandfriends.Anotheroptionincludingplacingthedeviceinadressinggown;however,thesizeofthelockboxcouldpreventthis.Inbothcasesstaffdidnotbelievethatitwaspossibletousethemanufacturersuppliedbag(Figure),duetodifficultiesinkeepingitclean.Thebagwasseentobeincompatiblewithcleaningprocessesordeemedas“singleuse”.

Figure1:Thebagsuppliedbythemanufacturer(left)andtheremadebag(centreandright).Seealsohttp://www.webcitation.org/6kJwikvNl

Inthehomeenvironmentthebagsusedtocarrytheequipmenthadbeenreplacedbycustom-madealternatives.Inthisenvironmentitwasmoreusualforpeopletowalkaroundwhilstcarryingthedevice.Thenewbagswerestyledinadifferentwayandlookedmoreattractive(Figure-centreandright).Theywereproducedbyvolunteersratherthanbeingpurchased.Charitieswerepreparedtocreatethebagsforfreeandtheycouldbepersonalisedinawaythatwasn’tpossiblewiththemanufacturersuppliedbags(OBS1).Staffhadtakenownershipofthelimitationsoftheexistingbag(whichtheyhadrestrictednumbersof,couldnotwash,andcouldnotreliablylocate).Theyhadworkedwithpatientsandcommunitygroupstomaketheirownbags.Thebagstookvaryingforms.Theyalsoappropriateditemslikehandbagsanddrawstringbagstoprovideadegreeoffamiliarityandmakethedevicefitwithpreferenceandlifestyle.Theconversesituationwaswherefactorsoutsidethecontrolofthenursingstaffwereimpactingtheappearanceoftheequipment.Forexample,staffmentionedthattheylikedthefactthatthenewsyringedriverwasdiscreet.Theycontrastedtheirexperiencewithitwithtimeswhentheyunexpectedlyencounteredequipmentthatwasnotdiscreet.Forexample,inthehospicecontext,staffreportedtheirconcernsaboutpatientsarrivingwithlargerbulkysyringedrivers,ofthetypeusedinahospitalenvironment.Oneparticipantreferredtothismachineasa“monster”(OBS2).

SelectiveuseofbatteriesandsyringesThedevicewasusedwithmultipleaccessoriesincluding:alockablebox(lockbox)-(Figure),keys,batteries,drugs,syringes,lines,wipesandneedles.Inthehomecarecontexttheseitemswerekeptinabagthatwaslocatedneartothesyringedriver.Adaptationswereidentifiedrelatingtotheuseoftheseaccessories,forexamplethebatteriesusedtopowerthedeviceandthesyringesusedtodispensedrugs.

Figure2:Lockboxusedtohousethedevice

Thechoiceofbatterywasimportantinthatifabatterywasofpoorqualityitwouldrunoutrapidly,thedevicewouldalarmandeventuallystop.Thiswouldcausethetreatmenttoendearlyandrequirestafftoattend.Generallyspeaking,batterieswouldlastforthreedaysandtheywerereplacedwellaheadoftime.Thelevelofpowerwascheckedpriortostartingthedevice.Howevertherewereavarietyofbatteriesinuseandtheperformanceofthebatterywashardtopredict(OBS3).Givenaconcernaboutthepotentialforthebatterytorunout,staffhadcompensatedbyadaptingandsupplementingtheirroutine.Inoneunusualcase,theyhadaskedthepatienttohelpbygettingthemtochangethebatterythemselves(OBS4).Otherbehavioursincludedstaffcarryingsparebatterieswiththemandkeepinguptothreesparebatteriesintheaccessorycase.Inthehospiceenvironment,theyhadaccesstoalocalsupplyofbatteriesandwoulddifferentiatebetween“good”batteriesandothersbasedonappearanceandmanufacturername.Inthiscase,asupplyofinferiorbatterieshadconfusedthesituation(OBS5;OBS6).Asimilarsituationwasobservedrelatingtoothercomponents.Therewererestrictionsonthetypesofsyringethatcouldbeusedwiththedevice.Forexample,a50mLsyringewouldnotfitintothelockbox.Usingsuchasyringecouldbepreferableasitprovidedextradiluent,whichwasgenerallyintheinterestofthepatient.Itwasnotpossibletocombinethissyringewiththedevicewhilstusingalockbox,sothistypeofsyringewasnotused.Staffsuggestedthatwhatwaspossiblewiththelockboxwasquiterestrictive.Forexamplesomestaffthoughtthatnothinglargerthana30mLsyringecouldbeused(OBS7).Similarconstraintsoccurredintermsofthepositioningofthesyringe.Forexample,ifa30mLsyringewasloadedinacertainwaythenthelockboxwouldnotcloseorthedevicewouldalarm.Thiscouldoccurifthecollarofthesyringewasnotatthecorrectangle(OBS8).Inthiscasetrainingandwordofmouthhadallowedstafftoadaptthewaythattheysetupthedevicetostopthisfrom

happening.Forexample,staffreportedcarefullycheckingthepositionofthesyringepriortoclosingthebox.

SecurityofthedeviceandusewithalockboxThesyringedriverthatisbeingusedbythenursesincludescontrolsdesignedtostopunauthorisedaccessandtampering.Thepreviouspieceofequipmenthadtypicallybeenuncontrolled,inthattheentirecontentsofthesyringecouldbedispensedasaresultoftampering(althoughtherewasanoptiontousethedevicewithalockbox).Thatdevicedidnothaveacomprehensiveeventlog(wayofrecordingdeviceactionssuchasachangeinrate).Thismeantthatifadevicewasemptiedinonegoitcouldbeimpossibletofullyunderstandwhathadhappened.Oneofthereasonsforintroducingthereplacementpieceofequipmentandaccompanyinglockboxwasconcernsaboutthislackofcontrol(OBS9).Unlikethepreviousequipment,thenewequipmentiscontainedwithinalockbox(Figure).Thelockboxprovidesadegreeofsecurityinthatitmakesitdifficultforotherstoaccessthedrugscontainedwithinthesyringedriverortamperwiththesyringe.Thedownsideofthelockboxisthatitmakesthedevicebulkyandcouldcomplicatelegitimateaccess(OBS10;OBS11).Atthesametimetheboxeswerebeingdroppedandbecomingcracked(OBS12).Staffsuggestedaneedtomaketheboxsofterandmorerobust(likeamobilephonecase).Thiswasbecausetheboxitselfcouldbeplacedunderabedpillow(toconcealthecombinationofdeviceandbox).Evenwhenthelockboxesworkedasdesigned,thereweredifferencesinapproachtostoringthekeyusedtoopenthelockbox.Itcouldbekeptneartothedevice,storedpersonally,and/orstoredcentrally(e.g.withotherwardkeysorinakeybox).Thesituationwasparticularlycomplicatedinthehomeenvironment.Whenusedinthehomecontext,staffwouldtypicallyleavethekeywiththedevicebuthideitinaninaccessibleplace.Whenthedevicehadbeenintroduced,itwasdecidedthatassparedrugswerekeptinthehome,trustwasrequired.Thistrustcouldbereflectedinthedecisiontoleavethekeywiththedevice.Ifstaffwereconcernedaboutthepotentialfordiversionofdrugs,oruncontrolleduseofthedriver,theycouldkeepthekeyontheirperson.Theycouldalsochoosenottoallowcaretooccurinthehome(OBS13).Itwaseasiertokeepthekeynearthedeviceratherthanwithamemberofstaffasmultiplepeoplewouldbeinvolvedinpatientcare.Bystoringakeywiththedevicetherewasadegreeofflexibilityinthatifotherstaffneededtoopenthedevice,theycoulddoso.Therefore,inthehomecarecontextstaffwereleavingthekeywiththedevice(mostofthetime).Theyhidthekeyinavarietyofplaces.Theycouldsometimeslosethekey(OBS14).Tocompensateforthisinonecasetwokeyswerehidden.Keyswerealsohiddeninaplacewhereitwasimpossibleforamemberofstaffnottodiscoverthem(e.g.discoveryofthekeywasimplicitintheprocedureforsettingupthedevice).

Sparekeyswerealsokeptinacentrallocation.Somekeyswereadaptedusingcolouredcaps,tomakethemasvisibleaspossible.Themeaningplacedinthekeywasthereforevariableandtherewasabalancetobeachievedbetweentheprotectionthatthelockprovidedandconcernsaboutimpedingcare.Theboxthereforeprovidedanimportantfunction,butaswiththebatteriesandsyringes,therehadbeenaneedforadaptation.

Table5:Quotationsfrominterviews.Participantnumbersareincludedaftereachquotation-(seeTable2).Recommendation Quotation REF1Providecustommadebag. “theycancarryitinabagwhichisreallygood…

andwhatbag?ummmpatientstendtocomeupwiththeirown,theytendtopersonaliseitreally,wehavehadquilters,wehavehadlikecraftpeople,thathavemadeusbags,ummandthepatientsloveit…”(26)

OBS1

2Makethedevicesmallandattractive.

“TobehonestatthemomentIcan’tthinkofthename,theywerejustmonsters.Weactuallyhadonesenthomeoverherebymistakeoncewithapatientfrom[hospitalname].Andeverybodyherewaspanickingbecausetheydidn’tknowwhatthismonsterwasorhowtheycouldturnitoff"(5)

OBS2

3Improvebatterytechnologyandincludechecksandcontrolsthatavoidtheneedforreplacementofthebatteryduringtreatment.

“Yesitwillstartbleepingbeforethebatteryrunsoutandsayssomethinglikebatterylow.Butwealwaystrywhenweleavetomakesurethatthere'senoughbatterytolastuntilthenextvisit.Butsometimesitwilljustdrainfornoreason.”(3)“Iftheyringupandsay,ohyouknow,itsaysbatterieslow,theycansometimeschangeitthemselves.Imean,theladywe'vegothasbeenonitforalongtime.Soitdiddothatandshewasabletochangethebatteryherself…”(3)“…batteries,Imeanyouneedagoodbatteryinit.YouknowIthinktherehasbeenaninstancewheretheyboughtthecheaperbatteries.Welltheyrunout[ofpower]innotime.”(5)“Sothennowwe’vehadamemosayingalwaysusethe[batterysupplier]onesthatarespecificallyboughtforit…”(7)

OBS3-OBS6

4Provideforcompatibilityacrosscommonlyusedaccessories(syringes);providefeedbackattimeofsetup;providereliableattachmentforthesyringe.

“…30.Itonlylikesthiskindofsyringe.Anyothersyringe,itdoesn’treallyliketorecogniseit.Andinmyexperience,ifyouputadifferentoneinandyougetittogo;italwaysbleepsatyouaboutanhourlater.But,it’snotdifficult.”(1)

OBS7

5Provideforcompatibilityacrosscommonlyusedaccessories(boxes).

“butitistryingtofititintheboxandsometimeswhenyouputtheliddown,thecollargetsdisplacedandthealarmwillgooff”(26)

OBS8

6Controlthecontentsofthedevice.

“whenIfirststartedbackin2008wehadthe…the[pump]hadjustbeenremovedbecauseofanincidentthatjusthappened.Therewassomesuggestionthatthefamilyhadtamperedwiththedeviceandbecauseofthat,becausetheyweren’tinlockableboxes,theywereremoved”(18)

OBS9

Recommendation Quotation REF7Whenthedeviceisusedwithinalockbox,ensurethatthedesignremainsappropriateforanambulatorycontext.

“Itisjustbasicallytheyfinditalittlebitbulkycarryingitaround…Especially[the]lockbox…”(14)

OBS10

8Ensurethemeanstoopen/shutthelockboxisreadilyavailableforthosewhorequireaccess.

“Thisistheplastic,there’salockablecase,whichisgoodinoneway,butofcourse,youknow,youhaveconcernsaboutwhere’sthekey.Soinmyparticulararea,weboughtthedifferentcolouredtagstoputonthekeys,likeorange,andwesaidwe’dkeepitinthefrontofthe[location].Otherareashaveactuallytapedittothe[location].It’smakingsurethateverybodyknowswherethiskeyis.”(26)

OBS11

9Ifthedeviceisusedwithaccessoriessuchasalockboxmakesurethattheyaresoftandrobustwhilstatthesametimeprovidingforquickandeasyaccess.

“…apartfromthecasinglikeIsaid,theplasticcasing,theoutercasingisquitebrittleandsometimesyouhavealittlestrugglewiththekeystogetthem…Toopenitproperly,youknowyou’refightingagainstitandtheysnaptheinnerlittleplasticbitthatlinksit,closesit.Thosewill...snapoff...Yes,andifsomeone,ifapatientdropsthem,whichtheywilldo,ifthey’refidgetingabouttheywilldropit,thatwilljustbreak.”(5)

OBS12

10Foradevicethatcontainssecuritycontrolsconsiderhowsuchcontrolswillworkinthehomeenvironment(e.g.whenthedeviceisleftalone).

“weusuallyhaveakeyandaspareinthebagandIcan’trememberifweeverhadakeyintheoffice,orwhetherwejustleftthemwiththepatient.Buttheyareleftinthebagandgenerallyspeakingthepatientsdon’ttouchthebagbecausethat’sgotthedrugsinit,andthekeyandasparebattery.”(7)

OBS13

11Foradevicethatcontainssecuritycontrolsprovidetheoptiontooverridethesystemineventofamishap.

“Imeanthelockboxoccasionallycausesaproblemifwelosethekey”(16)

OBS14

DiscussionInthecontextsthatwereobservedonlyonetypeofdeviceisbeingused.Thisisbecausetheselectionprocessconstrainsthetypeofdevicethatcanbepurchased.InordertobuythedeviceithastobeCEmarkedandthemanufacturer/distributorneedstogothroughanumberofchecks.Aseriesofevaluationcriteriaareappliedandthedeviceisexcludedifitfailscertainchecks.Theculminationoftheaboveisthatallcareprovidersusethesamedevice(see(VincentandBlandford,2017)foradetailedexplanation).Despiteasinglemakeofsyringedriverbeingusedacrosspalliativecare,adaptationhasoccurredtoovercomearangeofissues.Thishasimplicationsforthedesignanduseofmedicaltechnology.Ithighlightstheneedforconstantreviewandcustomisation.Forprocurementthismeansthatratherthanconsideringtheintroductionofequipmentatasinglepointintime,analysisandmonitoringneedstooccuracrossthelifecycle.Inhealthcaretheconceptofadaptation(orworkaround)iscommonlyregardednegatively(Halbesleben,2010).Itcreatesatensionbetweenanoutlookthatdescribessuchbehaviourasan"error","violation"or"deviation"versusonethatviewssuchbehavioursas"innovations"or"improvisations"(Debonoetal.,2013).Giventhistension,therearedifferentperspectivesonthebenefitthatadaptationprovides.RandelltouchesonthisinherstudyofalarmsettingsinanIntensiveCareUnit(ICU)(Randell,2003).Sheexploresthereasonsbehindadaptationsandwhytheymightnotbeviewedpositively.Inparticular,thedesign,manufactureanduseofmedicalequipmentisregulatedandtheproceduressurroundingequipmentdefined;changingthebehaviourofequipmentinalocalcontextrisksviolatingassumptionsmadeduringdesign,where“normal”conditionsofusearedefined.Notusingtechnologyinthisway(implicitinadaptation),mayimpactthesafetyandperformanceofasystem.Someofthetimethisisbeneficial(i.e.providingforflexibility);atothertimesitpresentsrisk,eitherwithintheimmediatecontextormorebroadlywithinthesystem.Similarissuesariseinmanymedicalcontexts.Thismeansthatthetraditionalapproachofoptimisingworkflowacrossasystemcanonlygosofarinestablishingefficiency,effectivenessandsatisfaction.ModelssuchasSEIPSrecognisetheneedfor"jobbalance"i.e.consideringinteractionsbetweenpeople,organisations,technology,tasksandtheenvironment.ThemedicaldevicedesignmodelbySharples(2012)includesexamplesof“adjustability”asafacilitator(ofpositiveconsequences);however,theregulatednatureofmedicaldevicedevelopmentlimitstheextenttowhichthiscanoccur(VincentandAmalberti,2016).Thisstudyofsyringedriverusehighlightsaneedforcustomisationandadaptation.Itreflectsthetensionbetweenatopdownapproachtoequipmentmanagement(i.e.asingletypeofequipmentconstrainsthewayinwhichstaff

work)andasocio-technicalapproachwheretheformoftechnologycanbevariable(i.e.jointoptimisationbetweengroups,toolsandtheenvironment).Elsewhere,thesedifferencesarereferredtoas“workasimagined”and“workasdone”(Blandfordetal.,2014;Hollnagel,2015).Thefirstapproachisadesignedorganisationwhererules,regulationsandstructuresreducetheneedforhumanjudgment.Inthiscasethereareadvantagestoasyringedriverbeinginflexible.Thesecondapproachallowstheorganisationtoco-evolvewithtechnologytoreachajointlyoptimisedsolution(inwhichcasethereisabenefittotechnologyprovidingforadegreeofflexibility).Thestudyreportedhereshowsthatastandardisedandmandatedtoolfailstodeliveragainsttheneedofuserswhentheirneedsvaryconsiderably.Forthisreasonthesecondapproachisrequired.

ConclusionThesefindingsemphasisetheneedforafluidrelationshipbetweentechnologyandorganisation.Inthedomainthatwasstudied,likeothers,adaptationwashappeninginacollaborativesense.Thesametechnology,ostensiblybeingusedforthesamepurpose–i.e.,palliativecare–wasadapteddifferentiallyinthedifferentcontextsofuse;thishighlightstheimportanceofthesocialcircumstancessurroundingtechnologyuse,asdiscussedbyBarley(1986).Inthisview,technologyistreatedasasocialobjectratherthanaphysicalone,andisconceptualisedasaprocessratherthananentity.Thismeansthatadaptationsarerecognisedinalocalcontextandthereisadrivetounderstandrepercussionsacrossthebroadersystem(bothsocialandtechnical).Asdiscussedabove,suchadaptivebehaviourscomewithbothrisksandbenefits,buttheyareanecessarycomponentofthesuccessfulintroductionoftechnology.Thisstudyhasparticularlyhighlightedmanyofthechallengesinherentinintroducingasafety-criticalmedicaldeviceintothehomecontext,wherethedignity,comfortandsafetyofthepatientallneedtobeconsidered,andwheretrainedprofessionalsarenotimmediatelyonhandtooverseeuseandinterveneifanythinguntowardoccurs.Theadaptationspresentedabovehighlightanopportunitytoreviewthevariousneedsofpatients,familiesandprofessionalsacrosscontexts,butparticularlyinthelesscontrolledcontextofthepatient’shome.Thiswillbeofgrowingimportanceasmorecareshiftstolessmedicalisedcontexts(e.g.,fromhospitaltohome).

ConflictofInterestStatementEmployment:ThefirstauthoriscurrentlyemployedbyproductandservicedesigninnovationconsultancyPDDGroupLtd.

AcknowledgmentsWewouldliketothankallofthosewhohavebeeninvolvedintheresearchpresentedinthispaper,includingallstudyparticipantsandresearchnurses.ThisstudywasconductedwithintheCHI+MEDproject,supportedbytheUKEngineeringandPhysicalSciencesResearchCouncil[EP/G059063/1].References

Amble,N.,2013.AutonomyandControlwhenWorkingwithHumans—AReflectiononSociotechnicalConcepts.20133,18.

Barley,S.R.,1986.Technologyasanoccasionforstructuring:evidencefromobservationsofCTscannersandthesocialorderofradiologydepartments.AdmSciQ31,78-108.

Bikson,T.K.,Eveland,J.D.,1996.Groupwareimplementation:reinventioninthesociotechnicalframe,Proceedingsofthe1996ACMconferenceonComputersupportedcooperativework.ACM,Boston,Massachusetts,USA,pp.428-437.

Blandford,A.,Furniss,D.,Vincent,C.,2014.Patientsafetyandinteractivemedicaldevices:Realigningworkasimaginedandworkasdone.ClinicalRisk20,107-110.

Braun,V.,Clarke,V.,2006.Usingthematicanalysisinpsychology.QualitativeResearchinPsychology3,77-101.

Cafazzo,J.A.,Casselman,M.,Hamming,N.,Katzman,D.K.,Palmert,M.R.,2012.DesignofanmHealthAppfortheSelf-managementofAdolescentType1Diabetes:APilotStudy.JMedInternetRes14,e70.

Carayon,P.,2009.TheBalanceTheoryandtheWorkSystemModel…TwentyYearsLater.InternationalJournalofHuman–ComputerInteraction25,313-327.

Carayon,P.,SchoofsHundt,A.,Karsh,B.-T.,Gurses,A.P.,Alvarado,C.J.,Smith,M.,FlatleyBrennan,P.,2006.Worksystemdesignforpatientsafety:theSEIPSmodel.QualityandSafetyinHealthCare15,i50-i58.

Carayon,P.,Smith,M.J.,2000.Workorganizationandergonomics.ApplErgon31,649-662.

Carayon,P.,Wetterneck,T.B.,Rivera-Rodriguez,A.J.,Hundt,A.S.,Hoonakker,P.,Holden,R.,Gurses,A.P.,2014.Humanfactorssystemsapproachtohealthcarequalityandpatientsafety.ApplErgon45,14-25.

Cook,R.I.,Woods,D.D.,1996.Adaptingtonewtechnologyintheoperatingroom.HumFactors38,593-613.

Costello,J.,Nyatanga,B.,Mula,C.,Hull,J.,2008.Thebenefitsanddrawbacksofsyringedriversinpalliativecare.Internationaljournalofpalliativenursing14,139-144.

Cruickshank,S.,Adamson,E.,Logan,J.,Brackenridge,K.,2010.Usingsyringedriversinpalliativecarewithinarural,communitysetting:capturingthewholeexperience.Internationaljournalofpalliativenursing16,126-132.

Debono,D.S.,Greenfield,D.,Travaglia,J.F.,Long,J.C.,Black,D.,Johnson,J.,Braithwaite,J.,2013.Nurses'workaroundsinacutehealthcaresettings:ascopingreview.BmcHealthServicesResearch13.

Furniss,D.,Masci,P.,Curzon,P.,Mayer,A.,Blandford,A.,2015.ExploringmedicaldevicedesignandusethroughlayersofDistributedCognition:Howaglucometeriscoupledwithitscontext.JournalofBiomedicalInformatics53,330-341.

Gasser,L.,1986.Theintegrationofcomputingandroutinework.ACMTrans.Inf.Syst.4,205-225.

Graham,F.,Clark,D.,2005.Thesyringedriverandthesubcutaneousrouteinpalliativecare:theinventor,thehistoryandtheimplications.Journalofpainandsymptommanagement29,32-40.

Guest,G.,Bunce,A.,Johnson,L.,2006.HowManyInterviewsAreEnough?:AnExperimentwithDataSaturationandVariability.FieldMethods18,59-82.

Halbesleben,J.R.,2010.Theroleofexhaustionandworkaroundsinpredictingoccupationalinjuries:across-laggedpanelstudyofhealthcareprofessionals.Journalofoccupationalhealthpsychology15,1-16.

Hollnagel,E.,2015.Whyiswork-as-imagineddifferentfromwork-as-done?,in:Wear,R.,Hollnagel,E.,Braithwaite,J.(Eds.),ResilienceHealthCare:Theresilienceofeverydayclinicalwork.Volume2.Ashgate,pp.249-264.

Koppel,R.,Wetterneck,T.,Telles,J.L.,Karsh,B.T.,2008.Workaroundstobarcodemedicationadministrationsystems:theiroccurrences,causes,andthreatstopatientsafety.JAmMedInformAssoc15,408-423.

Mackay,W.E.,1990.Usersandcustomizablesoftware:Aco-adaptivephenomenon.Citeseer.

McCormack,P.J.,Cooper,R.,Sutherland,S.,Stewart,H.,2001.Thesafeuseofsyringedriversforpalliativecare:anactionresearchproject.Internationaljournalofpalliativenursing7,574-580.

Money,A.G.,Barnett,J.,Kuljis,J.,Craven,M.P.,Martin,J.L.,Young,T.,2011.Theroleoftheuserwithinthemedicaldevicedesignanddevelopmentprocess:medicaldevicemanufacturers'perspectives.BmcMedicalInformaticsandDecisionMaking11.

NPSA,2010.RapidResponseReport:SaferAmbulatorySyringeDriversin:NPSA(Ed.).NPSA,London.

O'Kane,A.A.,Rogers,Y.,Blandford,A.E.,2015.ConcealingorRevealingMobileMedicalDevices?:DesigningforOnstageandOffstagePresentation,Proceedingsofthe33rdAnnualACMConferenceonHumanFactorsinComputingSystems.ACM,Seoul,RepublicofKorea,pp.1689-1698.

Obradovich,J.H.,Woods,D.D.,1996.Usersasdesigners:howpeoplecopewithpoorHCIdesignincomputer-basedmedicaldevices.HumanFactors38,574-592.

Oliver,D.,1988.Syringedriversinpalliativecare:areview.PalliativeMedicine2,21-26.Randell,R.,2003.Usercustomisationofmedicaldevices:therealityandthe

possibilities.Cognition,Technology&Work5,163-170.Rogers,Y.,1994.Exploringobstacles:integratingCSCWinevolvingorganisations,

Proceedingsofthe1994ACMconferenceonComputersupportedcooperativework.ACM,pp.67-77.

Sharples,S.,Martin,J.,Lang,A.,Craven,M.,O’Neill,S.,Barnett,J.,2012.Medicaldevicedesignincontext:Amodelofuser–deviceinteractionandconsequences.Displays33,221-232.

Smith,M.J.,Carayon,P.,1989.Abalancetheoryofjobdesignforstressreduction.InternationalJournalofIndustrialErgonomics4,67-79.

Trist,E.L.,Bamforth,K.W.,1951.SomeSocialandPsychologicalConsequencesoftheLongwallMethodofCoal-Getting.HumanRelations4,3-38.

Trist,E.L.,Higgin,G.W.,Murray,H.,Pollock,A.B.,1963.Organizationalchoice:capabilitiesofgroupsatthecoalfaceunderchangingtechnologies.TavistockPublications,[S.l.].

Vincent,C.J.,Blandford,A.,2017.Howdohealthserviceprofessionalsconsiderhumanfactorswhenpurchasinginteractivemedicaldevices?Aqualitativeinterviewstudy.AppliedErgonomics59,PartA,114-122.

Vincent,C.J.,Li,Y.,Blandford,A.,2014.Integrationofhumanfactorsandergonomicsduringmedicaldevicedesignanddevelopment:It'sallaboutcommunication.AppliedErgonomics45,413-419.

Vincent,C.,&Amalberti,R.(2016).Saferhealthcare.Cham:SpringerInternationalPublishing.

Watson,M.,Sanderson,P.,JohnRussell,W.,2004.Tailoringrevealsinformationrequirements:thecaseofanaesthesiaalarms.InteractingwithComputers16,271-293.

West,C.,2014.Theuseofsyringedriversinthecommunity:considerationsforpalliativecareproviders.Internationaljournalofpalliativenursing20,56,58-59.

Supplementarydata

Nameofcode Occurrences Category

Organisationandexperience(adviceandsupport)

76 Generalbackground

[Syringedriver]isgood/easytouse 54 GeneralbackgroundOverlapwithotherequipment 47 SecurityofthedeviceLockboxandlockboxissues 40 SecurityofthedeviceTraining 37 -Whatthesyringedriverisusedfor 31 GeneralbackgroundInvolvementinpurchasing 29 -Transitions 25 -Frequencyofuse 23 GeneralbackgroundKeys,locksandkeypadlocks 22 SecurityofthedeviceBatteries 19 Deviceand

accessoriesOverlapwithprescribingpractice 18 GeneralbackgroundPatient/familyperspective 16 DeviceandpatientSizeandweight 14 DeviceandpatientSyringes 14 Deviceand

accessoriesPortabilityandbags 13 Deviceandpatient

Whatthe[syringedriver]iscalled 13 GeneralbackgroundAesthetics 11 DeviceandpatientTriallingofequipment 10 -Workflow 10 GeneralbackgroundAlarms 9 DeviceandpatientHomecareversushospitalcare 9 GeneralbackgroundSafety 9 GeneralbackgroundOverlapwithpaperbasedsystems 8 -Trackingofequipment 8 -Cost 7 -Needforreliability 7 DeviceandpatientResource 7 -Checking 6 -Connectionswiththefrontline 6 GeneralbackgroundOnlythe[syringedriver]isavailable 6 -Otheraccessories 6 Deviceand

accessoriesAccuracy 5 -Notinvolvedinpurchasing 5 -Encouragedtoadopt 4 -Oldequipmentworse 4 GeneralbackgroundReasonsforprocurement 4 GeneralbackgroundResistancetochange 4 -Systems 4 -Unpredictability 4 -Inflexibility 3 -Quickreferenceguide/manual 3 -Timescalesonintroduction 3 -Unexpectedbehaviourofdevice 3 -Availabilityofequipment 2 -Calibration/servicing 2 -Devicelog 2 -Discreteequipment 2 DeviceandpatientEnvironmentalconsiderations 2 -Improvements 2 -Multidisciplinaryteams 2 -Offlabeluse 2 -Reliability 2 -Safetyvusability 2 -Thepumpgetsdropped 2 -Useofinstructionmanual/documentation

2 -

Adviceandsupport 1 -Avoidingcomplexity 1 -Committees 1 -Consent 1 -Continuity 1 -Costvpreference 1 -Despiteissuesstaffliketheequipment 1 -Fiddly 1 -Flawedassumptions 1 -Flexibility 1 -Forcedintroduction 1 -Growingresponsibilityofnurses 1 -Informationthatthepumpshouldprovide

1 -

Lackofinterest 1 -Lackoftraining 1 -Lettersofrecommendation 1 -Logs 1 -Misunderstandingregardingfunction 1 -Multiplepumpsforonepatient 1 -Needlefreedevices 1 -Outofhourssupport 1 -Potentialforerror 1 -Purchasingprovidesthewrongstuff 1 -Purchasing-goingbeyondasinglepointintime

1 -

Purchasingbroaderthanequipment 1 -Reducedependencyonmanufacturer 1 -Relationshipwithmanufacturer 1 -Trainerasamediator 1 -