banking restructuring and resolution: malaysia’s experience
DESCRIPTION
Presentation outline Malaysia’s economy and banking sector prior to Asian financial crisis Impact of financial crisis Framework for crisis containment Moving forwardTRANSCRIPT
1
Banking Restructuring and Resolution:
Malaysia’s Experienceby
Mohd Razif Abdul KadirAssistant Governor
Central Bank of Malaysia4-6 June 2003
WorldBank / IMF / US Federal Board 3rd Annual International Seminar on Critical Issues in Financial Stability:
Preventing and Confronting Bank Insolvency
2
Presentation outline
Malaysia’s economy and banking sector prior to Asian financial crisis
Impact of financial crisis
Framework for crisis containment
Moving forward
3
Malaysian economy: pre-Asian crisis Enjoyed strong GDP growth & price stability for 4 decades
Broad-based growth, averaging 8% for 8 consecutive years until 2Q 1997
Strong fiscal surpluses since 1993
Low unemployment (1997: 2.6%)
High domestic savings (1997: 39.4% of GNP)
Low foreign indebtedness– Short term debt: 29% of total debt– Debt servicing ratio: 5.5% (end-1997)
4
At onset of crisis, banking sector in position of strength
Policies were focused on development and reform:– Strengthening supervisory framework and intervention powers by BNM
BAFIA 1989 provided integrated banking supervision framework– Broadening and deepening financial market– Developing the bond market
Implemented pre-emptive measures to reduce vulnerability– Measures to slow down credit growth started in 1995– Contained formation of asset bubble in property and stock market with
imposition of lending limits in March 1997
Banking system: pre-Asian crisis
as at Jun-97RWCR 12%Net NPL ratio 2.2%Loan loss coverage 91.8%Profit before tax (half-year)
RM 5,310 m*
Loan growth ~ 29%
* RM3.8 = USD1
5
Nevertheless, there were areas of concernStrong loan growth
in 1994-97 of 23% p.a., with increased lending to vulnerable sectors
Under-developed bond market
Fragmented finance company industry (39 cos.) and narrow business focus
High loan exposure of the banking system
Concentration of risk in banking systemFinance cos. industry vulnerability
While property market plateaued, stock market continued to rally
Risk of correction and outflows
6
Impact of financial crisis
Sharp drop in currency
valueRM depreciated by about 40% against USD
Major corrections in equity market
KLSE fell by about 79%
Inflation peakedat 6.2% in June ‘98
Strains on banking sector
Rising NPL (2.2%7.3%)
Capital erosionHigher funding cost
Tight liquidity
Distressed
corporate sector
Downgrading of
sovereign rating
Deteriorating economic conditions
Real GDP contracted by
6.7% in ‘98
Weak regional export
demand
7
The vicious cycle of the crisisFall in currency value
Fall in stock market valueExtreme volatility in financial markets
• Health of companies• Wealth of consumers
Economic activities
Inefficiencies inintermediation
process
NPLs Health of banks
8
Framework for crisis containment
Pre-emptive & comprehensive package to ensure intermediation process functioning
Corporate Debt Restructuring Committee
Voluntary debt workout
Danaharta•Remove NPLs•Maximise recovery
DanamodalRecapitalise viable institutions
Domestic banking sector consolidation
Consolidate fragmented industry
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
SME special funds
Provide financing at reasonable
rate
9
Restructure existing loans
Danamodal
Bank
Danaharta
Borrowers
CDRC
Rehabilitation
New Capital
Sell NPLs
Bonds/ Cash
New Loans
BondsCash
Steering Committee - BNM
Rehabilitation
FundsNew loans/ restructure distressed loans
Linkages between Danaharta, Danamodal & CDRC
10
Operating principles
• Market-based
• Hair-cut
• Backed by legislation
• Sharing of excess recoveries (80:20)
• Mgmt of NPL
Danaharta • First loss principle
• Viable institutions
• Danamodal appointees
• Management revamped where necessary
Danamodal• Voluntary
• Complements Danaharta
• Facilitates debt restructuring of larger firms
• Ceased operations in August 2002
CDRC
11
Danaharta Acquired RM39.8 billion* or 38.5% of NPLs of the banking system at average discount rate of 54.4%
Successfully dealt with all of the NPLs under its purview amounting to RM52.5 billion*
Implemented various recovery strategies through restructuring, settlement, foreclosure and schemes of arrangements to maximise recovery
– Average recovery rate of 57% (50% for acquired loans, 63% for managed loans)
Expect to cease operations in 2005 as planned
* RM3.8 = USD1
12
Special powers accorded under the Act to enable them to operate quickly and efficiently
– Include powers of compulsory acquisition, to change shareholdings and substitute existing boards, as well as powers to repudiate contracts, transfer assets and liquidate companies
Act also protects Danaharta against unknown claims in relation to acquired NPLs. However, claimant continues to have recourse to the selling BI or original lending BI
NPLs acquisition are on willing buyer, willing seller basis – BIs are free to sell or keep their NPLs
– However, those seeking capital injection from Danamodal must sell their NPLs (in excess of 10%)
Sharing of surplus recovery is on 80:20 basis (selling institution : Danaharta)
Danaharta – Key success factors
13
Danaharta – Governance structureDanaharta structured to facilitate transparency with strong corporate governance (diverse Board members –
9 members including foreigner reps, 7 from industry & 2 from Government)
Establishment of an oversight committee to oversee, approve and terminate appointments of special administrators
Not allow any one person to make decisions on loan restructuring or sales of assets
– Helps fend off legal action and challenges
Foreclosed property sold through an open tender process
14
•However, only RM7.1 billion* was injected into 10 viable banking institutions
•Adhered to first-loss principle
•Repayment began after 1year of injection•RM5 billion* repaid to date
•RM2.1 billion* remain in 3 banking institutions
•Targeted for closure in 2003
Danamodal – initial budget of RM16 billion
* RM3.8 = USD1
15
Corporate Debt Restructuring Committee
Steering Committee provide oversight
Eligibility criteria:– Company must be viable– Aggregate debts of RM100 million* or more (adjusted fr RM50m)– More than 5 creditors (adjusted fr 3 creditors)– Company not in any insolvency administration eg liquidation
Voluntary platform for creditors and borrowers to work out feasible solutions to debt problems amicably
without resorting to legal action or liquidation
Preserve value of viable companies
* RM3.8 = USD1
16
CDRC – Principles and progress Principles of debt restructuring:
– Fair treatment to ALL stakeholders– Haircuts borne by shareholders (greater proportion) and
creditors– Accompanied by corporate restructuring
Sale of non-core assets, refocus business activities– Full information disclosure and sharing of information Status of CDRC cases as at 31 March 2003
Total debt outstanding (RM m)
Number of accounts
Total transferred to CDRC 67,644 87Cases withdrawn / rejected 12,615 28Transferred to Danaharta 2,470 11Cases accepted 52,559 48Resolved 52,559 48
Implemented 44,557 33Pending implementation 8,002 15
17
Consolidation was also promoted to further strengthen the banking sector To attain minimum capital size
– Increased larger capital size of domestic banking groups to RM2 billion*
– To reap the benefits of economies of scale– To increase capacity to deal with increasing pressure from
globalisation and liberalisation– Massive capital investments in infrastructure and technology
To address fragmentation of the domestic banking sector
– The number of banking institutions has reduced from 71(end-97) to 30 banking institutions under 10 banking groups
Tax incentives to facilitate consolidation
* RM3.8 = USD1
18
Institutional arrangements have yielded positive result at low cost of <5% of GDP
Closure of Corp Debt Restructuring Committee in August 2002 Winding down operations of Danamodal and Danaharta
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
J an May Sep Jan May Sep Jan May Sep Jan
%
Net NPL ratio
Core capital
RWCR
2000 2001 2002 2003
11.8%12.3%
13.3% 13.2%
11%
6.3%
8.3%
7.0%
At end-April 2003, capitalisation remained strong
– RWCR : 13.2% (98 : 10.1%)– Core Cap Ratio : 11.0%
(98 :7.9%)
Asset quality improved further
Net NPL ratio – (6-mth basis) - 7.0% (98 :9.0%)– (3-mth basis) - 9.8% (98 : 14.9%)
19
Key success factors Strong commitment and support by Government
Pre-emptive and comprehensive approach
Focused role and clear objective of institutional arrangement
Enabling legal infrastructure– Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Berhad Act 1998 (PDNBA)
Political will – speed in passing of PDNBA
Market principles and strong governance
“Carrot and stick” approach
20
Moving forward – medium and long term strategies Enhancing financial system stability (surveillance system, deposit protection)
Enhancing regulatory and supervisory framework Managing financial liberalisation (GATS etc) Achieving socio-economic objectives Developing a competitive banking sector
FINANCIAL SECTOR MASTERPLAN
21
Launched in March 2001 Five main characteristics: efficient, effective, stable,
prudential regulation and infrastructure Broad strategies with 119 recommendations 6 building blocks
Banking Insurance
Islamic Banking & Takaful
Development Financial Institutions
Labuan IOFC
Alternative Modes of Financing
Financial Sector Masterplan
22
Create a more efficient, effective and stable financial system
efficient: services at lowest cost
effective: broad range of services
stable: minimal systemic risks
Meet socio-economic objectives in an effective and efficient manner
Meet international commitments and prepare domestic financial institutions for global competition
Support the overall economic transition
Develop and strengthen the real sector
Meet the demands of the consumers
Develop a core of strong domestic banks to be the backbone of the financial system
FSMP - Objectives
23
Phase 1
Phase 3
• Intensify competitive pressure in the domestic financial sector
•Assimilate into global arena• Introduce new foreign competition
Enhance capacity of domestic institutions to compete
Enhance financial infrastructure
Recommendations will be implemented in Three Phases
Phase 2
Checkpoints
Checkpoints
(3 years)(3-4 years)
( after 7 years)
24
Thank You