barbara brandtner head of unit, enforcement and procedural reform dg competition brussels, 6 march...
DESCRIPTION
Average inflow of cases Pending cases: almost half complaints (but still more decisions on notifications) State aid procedures : background (II)TRANSCRIPT
Barbara BRANDTNERHead of Unit, Enforcement and Procedural ReformDG Competition
Brussels, 6 March 2012
Session 3 : Procedural reform
State aid procedures : background (I) Legal Framework • Council Regulation 659/99 of 22 March 1999
(the « Procedural Regulation »)• Commission Regulation 794/2004 of 21 April 2004
(the « Implementing Regulation »)
1st step: The Simplification Package of 2009• Best Practices Code• Notice on a Simplified Procedure
Average inflow of cases 2008-2011
Pre-notification
Notification
Existing aid
Complaint
Non-notified
Formal investigation
• Pending cases: almost half complaints (but still more decisions
on notifications)
State aid procedures : background (II)
Pre-notif ication
Notification
Monitoring cases
Complaints
Average duration of decided cases and age of pending cases
Duration of decided cases Age of pending cases
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 August 2011
Pre-notifications (PN) Duration 5,9 6,3 4,1 5,1 5,9 Age 6,1
Notified cases (N) Duration 5,8 7,5 4,9 5,0 4,8 Age 5,4
C preceded by N Duration 14,4 20,8 18,1 27,1 28,0 Age 13,9
Cas présumés (CP) Duration 14,9 13,9 16,1 14,2 17,3 Age 20,4
Non-notified cases (NN) Duration 11,4 9,3 22,4 16,6 11,4 Age 21,5
C preceded by NN Duration 27,7 22,7 37,4 35,2 37,5 Age 32,8
Objectives of the reform Reinforce the efficiency of State aid procedures• Need for faster, more transparent and more predictable
procedures• Need to gather the appropriate information within business
relevant deadlines Better set priorities: • More focus on State aid issues which matter at the level of
the EU• Simplify the treatment of aid measures that have little impact
on the functioning of the Internal market
How to improve complaints handling ?
Should filters be introduced to improve the quality of the information received from the complainants; e.g. mandatory complaints form?
How should the investigation of a complaint be closed? Is a Commission decision needed in all cases?
Could the role of the national authorities be reinforced? How could the workload of the Member States, the
Commission and third parties be reduced?
How to access to complete information within a relevant timeframe and at lower
cost ? How could the necessary information be gathered more
quickly to speed up procedures? How could the administrative burden on Member States
of providing information be reduced? Should the Commission be able to obtain faster/more
reliable information from market participants and, if so, under which conditions?
When would this be most appropriate?