8/17/2019 Bare essentials or essentials bared?

1/2

 

Bare essentials or essentials bared?

http://bit.ly/1Tfo6TU 

Teotonio R. de Souza

This column is inspired by a theme brought up recently for discussion in an academic internet

forum of multidisciplinary nature. It was Lilliana Ramos-Collado of the University of Puerto

Rico at Rio Piedras that challenged the forum participants to share their views about the

dichotomy “naked and nude”.

Despite a clinical anatomical start, a specialist in anatomy and occupational medicine at the

New University of Lisbon did not rule out an artistic way of looking at the “splendour of

nudity”. More inputs and viewpoints surged rapidly and from different perspectives, marked

by different professional and cultural backgrounds. All together they are very enlightening, but

also far from consensus.

Any person using words must be careful to define precisely by context the meanings that one

wishes to convey. Poetry can attain a density of meaning and suggestion that we seldom

encounter in prose, but we cannot forget that at all times a word has more than one meaning,

or connotations. Let us not forget that words express concepts, derived from the Latin

concipere (=conceive, capture, seize), implying grasping something by force.

As Carl G. Jung tells us, this characterizes the western attitude towards the world. The

European has a science of nature and knows phantastically little about the nature in himself.

Jung praises the India yoga tradition representing a methodology of merging the body and thespirit into a unity which enables the surge of feelings and intuitions which transcend the level

of consciousness. The Indian “thought” is a widening of vision and not an assault to capture

what remains untapped in nature. Most dychotomies, including that of naked and nude are

the product of the western culture.

St. John, the Gospel writer proceeds to declare the supreme creative power of the Word,

which was God himself, who created heavens and the earth. The biblical story of creation, at

least in its English translations, God found that Adam and Eve had covered themselves after

eating the forbidden fruit because they felt they were naked (or nude?). If we have to believe

that languages are relatively recent development in human evolution, the dychotomy of naked

/ nude can be better understood at the level of feelings, desires and repulsion, not words.

What would a Goan speaking and thinking in Konkani feel about nagddo and pozddo?

We know of the traditional listing of arts as including architecture, sculpture, painting, music,

poetry, dance, performing. In 1911 the Italian Ricciota Canudo added cinema as the 7th art.

There is no reason why more could not be added to the list, even though the number seven

has become symbolic of perfection as represented by the seven days of creation, which

included a day to rest to appreciate the creation! The Masonic adoption of the symbolism in

its winding staircase of seven steps has enhanced the metaphor!

I was thinking of the art of haute couture as yet another 7th art. If the objective of art, such as

painting or sculpture, representing the nude human body is generally viewed as appreciation

of nature freed from socio-cultural drapings, does the designer’s high couture promote

http://bit.ly/1Tfo6TUhttp://bit.ly/1Tfo6TUhttps://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_Puerto_Rico_at_Rio_Piedrashttps://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_Puerto_Rico_at_Rio_Piedrashttps://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_Puerto_Rico_at_Rio_Piedrashttps://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_Puerto_Rico_at_Rio_Piedrashttp://bit.ly/1Tfo6TU

8/17/2019 Bare essentials or essentials bared?

2/2

intentional provocation of sexual instinct by dressing the naked body just enough to arouse

the instinctive urge for discovery, or undressing the rest. An art of covering the bare

essentials, perfecting thereby the primitive art of low couture of sewing the fig leaves.

That is what Salman Rushdie suggested in the very first chapter of his book The Last Sigh of the

Moor (1994) that was released in Lisbon to commemorate the Portuguese Disoveries, hopingperhaps that in the wake of the Satanic verses, it could provoke the Portuguese. To paraphrase

Rushdie: ”Pepper it was that brougth Vasco da Gama´s tall ships across the ocean, from

Lisbon’s Tower of Belem to the Malabar Coast …. That in the period called Discovery-of-India.

How could we be discovered when we were not covered before? What the world wanted

from bloody mother India was daylight-clear. They came for the hot stuff, just like any man

calling on a tart.” 

While the Satanic Verses earned for Rushdie an Iranian fatwa, luckily for him, the Portuguese,

little given to reading, ignored Rushdie’s taunts by their sound of silence. I presume that

neither the Goans took notice of his rude and mischievous handling of the Goan painter from

Loutolim, whom he calls Vasco Miranda, who fills his book from the beginning till end withnasty epithets and insinuations. Why so? Possibly some illustrious occupant of the Mario

Miranda chair of the Goa University could find an explanation.

At one stage Vasco Miranda is described as plunged in one of his black-dog depressions,

following the Indian occupation of Goa and crying dismissively “Down with Mother India, Viva

Mother Portugoose”. In his enigmatic torrent of ridicule poured on Vasco Miranda, Rusdhie

tells us that “in every picture Vasco painted (…) he never failed to include a small immaculate

image of a cross-legged woman with one exposed breast, sitting on a lizard with arms cradling

nothing, unless of course they were cradling the invisible Vasco.”