barnett|keyes v obama (ninth circuit - 45 - received non party letter dated 04/30/2011 -...

8/6/2019 BARNETT|KEYES v OBAMA (NINTH CIRCUIT - 45 - Received non party letter dated 04/30/2011 - TransportRoom.45.0

1/5

k .= kT. '- 1 V E DV,(3i LY (-;. I-..IAYER CLERKU.:-j ,ct.:itlaT' '3F APPEALS's' I . l$ lf C 2, 2 1o : Cathy A. Catterson, Circuit & Court of Appeals Executive

Oftke of the Circuit ExecutiveU.S. Courts for the Ninth CircuitP.O. Box 193939San Francisco, CA 94119-3939

(415) 355-8800 fax: (415) 355-8901Alex Kozinskis Chief JudgeOmce of the Circuit ExecutiveU.S. Courts for the Ninth CircuitP.O. Box 193939San Francisco, CA 941 19-3939(415) 355-8800 fax: (415) 355-8901

FILEDMolly Dwyer, Clerk of Court 'DQCFCETED-- DATE INITOmce of the ClerkU.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitP.O. Box l 93939San Francisco, CA 941 19-3939(415) 355-8000 fax: (415) 355-8551

' Office 9* Circuit Court of Appealslerk s ,125 South Grand AvenuePasaden y CA 9 1 1 05626) 229-7250 fax: (626) 229-7462

Cc: Dr. Orly Taitz and Mr. Gary Kreep, Attorneys for the Plaintiffs;Mr. David Delute and Mr. Roger West, Attorneys for the Defendants;Other interested citizens, groups, and entities, both public and private.

Re: Vxpress mandates of the United States Code *require* a forced conclusion in fhis cas

Dear Oftkials, Judges, and Stafrof the Ninth Circuit:

We, as American citizens, know you will duly provide complete notice of the contents herein toh l f udges who were assigned to hear the oral arguments on May 2nd in Pasadena withine pane othe constitutional-crisis case of Wilev Drtzke, e/ al v. Barack Obama. et c/e Docket No. 09-56827.

00-5$827

Because mandates of express federal law *absolutely require* the Plaintiffs to win their primaryobjective (regardless of any arguments raised), your panel's sole remaining duties are: to r ule intheir favor accordingly; and to grant all relief that is necessarily essential and subsequent thereto .lf the panel's ruling does not comply with these mandates of law, then you could be called intoconstitutional ethics questions, for failing, ignoring, or otherwise neglecting to rel al these samecommanding authorities to your own fellow employees, within such an historic judiclary issue asthis one - wherein several federal judges have already revealed their treasonous contempt andutter disdain for our Constitution, and for the People's clear right to assure a lawful Presidency .So, then, the following are nmongst the absolutely mandatory requirements of 1aw in play herein:

Title 44, Chapter 22, of the United States Code, entitled as ttpresidential Records'' clarifies andmandates, inter alia, that: I11 each of the sought records om Mr. Obama aka Soetoro havingprobative value as evidence to determine his constimtional eligibility, or not.. to the Office ofPresident is declared by express federal law as a tpresidential record''; I21 all such ttpresidentialrecords'' are now entirely and wholly owned by the United States, and not by Mr. Obama akaSoetoro anymore; I31 no such Ppresldential records'' may ever be concealed under any form ofprivacy whatsoever; and I41 the same records are requiredto be freely available, publi domain.

Case: 10-55084 05/06/2011 Page: 1 of 5 ID: 7744218 DktEntry: 45


2/5

This is because the repeated suttltory key phrase - Lnthe cartying out ofconstitutional, statutoryor other official or ceremonial duties of the President', - obviously includes the duty of Mr.Obama aka Soetoro to qualify himself AS the ostensibly-eligible President. Indeed, it is actuallya mandated legal duty of Mr. Obama aka Soetoro, AS ''Presidenf', to personallv make sure thathis real birth certificate, and other such constitutional eligibility documentation, were put into the

freely available public domain upon his vcryWrx/ da.v in assuming the Omce of the Presidency.Rephrasing the question against M.r. Obama aka Soetoro, it is mere child's play to point out theobvious statutory mandates of the United States Code in control of the entire matter, e.g.: (1) thatall of Barack's same such records of constitutional-eligibility importance are expressly notprotected to any privacy, whatsoever, 44 U.S.C. j 2204(c); further, that (2) Barack does not evenown those records, anymore, because, as lpresident', they are now owned solely by the UnitedStates, 44 U.S.C. j 2202, and even further, that (3J Barack's duty under law, mandated, hasalways been to ensure those same records are made public domain and freely available for thedaily reviewing by any citizen, see 44 U.S.C. 5j 2203(a) and 2204(c), then 5 U.S.C. j 552.Ironically also, by the very operation and direct efrect of these statutes, Mr. Obama aka Soetoro

therefore necessarily has p .q legal bases or claims or interests or rights, whatsoever, to continueconcealing tipresidential records'' which now belong only to 1We The People', until he wouldfirst prove his own authentic U.S. citizenship of any level, thereby esblishing a citizen portionof legal ownership to such records - byhrst revealing the same records as proof o/citizenship. ..This is a classic C'Catch-22'' of course, but, in fact, the entire worldwide topic of *where* Mr.Obama aka Soetoro was born becomes instantly and legally irrelevant and moot in the face of theindisputable fact that he simply can never be constitutionally eligible as a valid president'' underthe Stnatural born'' clause, because one parent (his daddy) never had U.S. citizenship of any level.To act as a federal judge with enough legal knowledge to obtain one of the higher positions uponany Circuit Court of Appeals, yet behave as fwitkout understanding regarding the namral born'clause as it relates to requiring two (2) citizen parents, is to also conclusively reveal far too muchincompetence and disdain for the law, to remain in such an important position of the public tnzst.

The three (3) different levels of U.S. citizenship are established. They include unatural bonf',snative born'' and naturalized'' citizens. For example, Stanley Annte) Dunham/soetoro, themother of M.r. Obama aka Soetoro, was originally a full ttnatural born'' citizen, herselti beingconceived by two existing U.S. citizens (her parents) who were also both still U.S. citizens at herbirth. ln full contr%t, the father of Mr. Obama aka Soetoro, Barack Sr., was never a U.S. citizenof any level, whatsoever, as the world knows. As a direct consequence, Mr. Obama aka Soetoro,himselt i.e., the currently-sitting Etpresident'' can never be Snatural born'' as is constitutionallyrequired for Presidency, but only tnative born'' or tnaturalized'' as second or third best levels ofU.S. citizenship. The secondary level, GGnative bonf', is what the birth certiticate issue is allabout, as fborn in Hawaii, Obama would be at lemst tEnative born'' on U.S. soil (if mommy hadbeen back on U.S. soil for at least 6 months prior to birth, which she apparently had not been..),but still never natural born'', again, because daddy was not *also* a U.S. citizen before Barry'sbirth, and never was, as is admitted by everyone. Evtn native born'', Mr. Obama aka Soetorowould have still automatically lost his any (doubtful) citizenship with the U.S., when his

2



3/5

mommy took him to foreign lands that were on our State Department's no-no lists, and enrolledlittle Barry as a new *citizen* there in order to attend their schools, such as when they lived inlndonesia. Rettlrning to the U.S. later, his mommy *might* have tried to get them both'inamralized'' as immigrants or rettlrning ex-citizens obtaining/re-obtaining their U.S. citizenship,but did she do that each time they le for foreign lands and later came back? This is problematicat best. Furthermore, later in life as a young adult, Mr. Obnma aka Soetoro himself took up hisown residencies in the same manner, against our State Department's rules in effect at the time,like when he lived in Pakistan, etc. Once again, having automatically had his any existing(doubtful) citizenship cancelled each time, any return back to living in the United States againwould necessitate re-initializing the inaturalization'' or ttre-naturalization'' level of citizenship,because his any true dnative born'' level of U.S. citizenship (the tillawaii birth or not'' issue) waslong gone lost, anyway, when Barry and mommy kept moving back and fol'th around the worldto bad places. lt is seriously doubtful that Mr. Obama aka Soetoro has any *valid* naturalizationstatus, which is the ONLY possible citizenship level he COULD have left now (the 3rd level),since his any native born (2nd level) is automatically long gone lost, and - to the simplest point -he never even had the required 1st level of citizenship, iEnatural bonf', to be lawful President, inthe first place, because daddy was never *also* a U.S. citizen, and also a U.S. citizen before little

Barry was born... wherever Obnma wms born. Mn Obama aka Soetoro is *not* a lawful U.S.President, and never was. There is absolutely no possible way he ever couldbe legally valid.

ne 1aw on this critical subject is far too well established, for literally hundreds of years now,and in multiple formats a1l applyinj directly to the ultimate and inevitable conclusion - withouthaving both of his parents as U.S. cltizens (of any citizenship level), and that as prior to his birth,Mr. Obama aka Soetoro simply is not, and never was, lawfully eligible for the U.S. Presidency,and must be removed from OYce, as expediently as possible by at least one of the legal methodsavailable under the Constitution, and replaced wlth the most properly-eligible person under law.Heck, even your own online Ninth Circuit website Gvacancy Announcements'' for employmentof court personnel include these standard conditions ofall employment roles (emphasis added):

CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENTMust be a U.S. citizen or a citizen of a country with a defense treaty withthe U.S. who is eligible to work in the U.S. Positions with the U.S. Courtsare excepted service appointments. Excepted service appointments are atwill and can be terminated wiEh or without cause by the Court. Employeeswill be hired provisionally pending the results of a backgroundinvestigation and fingerprinting, and are subject to a probationary period.Direct deposit of pay required.

lt doesn't matter that tpresident'' Chester A. Arthur got away with this exact samefraud over ahundred years ago, when his own father was still not a U.S. citizen at the time of Chester's birth.(Chester's father got tnaturalized'' after Chester's birth, and Chester also allowed and/or helpedhis own Ebirther' ' issue to distract fr om the tru e issue - lack of tnatural born'' stattls.) 'I'he onlymatter of importance relevant to that prior experience, now, is that, obviously, the entire FederalGovernment has miserably failed the American people again, and should probably be held liable.

Moreover, knowledgeable American citizens are tired of the treasonous fraud being committedby the U.S. Department of Justice attorneys defending Mr. Obama aka Soetoro in all these cases.



4/5

Pursuant to further expressly-written mandates of federal statutes, neither Mr. Eric Holder, thecurrent United States Attorney General, nor any of his US/DOJ staff attorneys CU.S. Attorneys''and/or CEU.S. Assistant Attorneys'') are ever allowed to even consider defending Mr. Obama akaSoetoro in these situations. lt is an absolutely preposterous and outrageously criminal conflict ofinterest for any of these people to actually try to d ejknd him in these matters, at any time, ever.Under g ll the relevant statutes of the United States Code pertaining to any of the possible termsinvolved, i.e., lsoath'' uinaturalization'' uloyalty'' dteligibility'' Gcitizenship'' tnationality'' and 7 5 ' 5 'etc., the U.S. Attorney General and his U.S. DOJ staff of attorneys must avoid representation indefensefor any government omcial or employee who is embroiled by legal issues falling underone of those similar terms, precisely because they are required by law to Qinvestigate* andkprosecute* against any such people on U.S. soil with raised issues of potential alien nationalityor illegal immigration. See, many individual federal statutes like 8 U.S.C. j 1 103 and etc., butgenerally the whole of Chapters 12 Ctlmmigration and Nationality'') and 13 Clmmigration andNattlralization Service'') under Title 8 of the U.S. Code, remembering that this entire INS agencyis a sub-component of the U.S. Department of Justice. a 161w enforcement agency. See, 8 j 1551 .

ln garticular, Mr. Eric Holder and his US/DOJ staFhave *always* been - ev er since the varioustelljibility'' cases had first ori ginated - absolutely duty bound to start a criminal hwestigationagalnst Hpresident'' Obama regarding these issues, pursuant to express mandate of 28 USC j 591,because not only is the US/DOJ in charge otl and responsible for, these immigration/foreignerissues within America and its various political omces, but, in having multitudes of direct legaldocumentation/evidence served upon them - multiple times, by multiple ibirther'' attorneys, inthe direct due course of multiple legal proceedings - Mr. Eric Holder, along with tthe usualsuspects'' (a small group of the same US Attorneys who have been routinely defending Obamaover and over in these different eligibility cases), are also each already and intimately familiarwith the sheer mountain of fraud involved by Obamw i.e., they Iknow that Mr. Obnma akaSoetoro is currently engaged in multle forms of Obstruction of Justice - well more than enoughto trigger the express mandate of 28 USC 591 to criminally investigate him... NOT dejknd him!Not only should the panel of this Court sua sponte strike aII pleadings and other filings made bythe US/DOJ attorneys from the record on appeal, and give Summary Judgment to the Plaintiffs atb0th levels of proceedings, it also appears, that from committing such onerous conflicts ofinterest and also aftirmatively assisting Mn Obama aka Soetoro in continuing to defraud al1 ofAmerica, that either Attorney General Eric Holder, himseltl and/or also these same Governmentattorneys herein, are now also subject to immediate removal from their oftkes, pursuant to theprovisions of 28 U.S.C. jj 528, 5308 and 547. They were *required* toprosecute, not defend! !Next, any tmere'' citizen has cxrrclx/y-prov#e#jurisdiction AN.D standing to directly sue overthese matters, under variety of stamtory authority, e.g., 2 U.S.C. j 437h, 5 U.S.C. jj 702 & 706,26 U.S.C. j 9011, 42 U.S.C. j 1973gg-9 and etc. Jurisdiction and mere'' citizen standing can be*also* achieved through fotmdational Constitutional authority, e.g., using Art. lV, Sec. 2, Clause1 (equal privileges and immunities of citizens), and/or Art. 1V, Sec. 4 (guaranteed form ofgovernment), and/or Art. Vl, Clause 3 (President required to support Constitution by oath oraflirmation), Amend. 1 (petition for redress), Amend. IX (no denying rights of people), Amend.X (powers reserved to people), and/or Amend. XIV, Sec. 1 (no denying equal protection of law).

4



5/5

ln reverse summary, therefore, these are among the mandated results of expressly-written federalstatutes in ANY and ALL of the eligibility cases out there filed against Mr. Obama aka Soetoro:

@ Any timere'' citizen has notjust one, but, in fact, mult+le statutory authorities to providehim or her with clearjurisdiction and standing over these issues, in one way or another;

* From the vel.y tirst teligibility'' case filed into the federal court system, Attorney General

Eric Holder and his crew of US/DOJ Attorneys were *required* to prosecute Mr. Obamaaka Soetoro, and *never* allowed to defend him, ever - All of their pleadings in all ofthese many cases are *required* to be stricken from the records, but we can skip that, ifthey will just DO their mandatedjobs, now, and initiate the criminal prosecutionts);

@ The Plaintiffs are absolutely entitled, as a matter of law, to obtain the various records thatthey seek for disclosure from Mr. Obama aka Soetoro to either prove or disprove his anyeliglbility for the Presidency - Not only are they entitled to an outstanding, Stlandslide''Summary Judgment in their favor, anyway, but these lpresidential Records'' are requiredto be public domain, regardless, already, and it was/is Obama's job to e nsure that is done;

* Even though Plaintiffs are absolutely entitled to one of their primary objectives, which isobtaining all those records to fmally prove the actual place of birth, ALL of that is STILLtoully irrelevant, in the end, because of higher, clear-cut tnatural born'' requirements;

@ Because Mr. Obama aka Soetoro never had BOTH of his parents as (any level o9 U.S.citizens, he cannot Iegally have ever been, and certainly is not, a *valid* President; and,* Accordingly, Mr. Obama aka Soetoro absolutely must, by law, be removed from Oflice.

We, as American citizens, are nauseated by seeing all three Branches of our Federal Governmentactually trunning cover'' in the largest conspiracy of modern times, to defraud the entire worldby treasonous, smdicate protections of an obviously-ineligible lmpostor inside our White House.

However, we also understand that there may be undue influences hwolved. Regardless, though,it is high time for the Judiciary Branch to show a little backbone against the other Branches, andstand up for the obvious truth of things, that much of America also sees painfully well. It is timefor the Judiciary Branch to regain a healthy amount of energizing respect it has lost in past years,and it is time for Members of the Judiciary Branch to give the Constitution back to their children.Removing the faux president' should present no fear when the replacement solutions are guided

th A dment necessarily provides actual seoaratey law , itself Because the language of the 12 menelection campaigns by Presidential and Vice-presidential candidates, or else the various tdistinct'phrases become pointless and meritless (for there would never be any need for 'tcounting rules''to distinguish between vote totals that were always the same for bo th trtlnning matesn), it is mostreasonably likely that Sarah Palin would have, in fact, won the Vice-presidency on her tpwn overBiden's any competing campaign, and that she would now be the currently sitting Vice-presidentalongside Mr. Obama aka Soetoro. Whether Palin or Biden should tbest'' be there now, Speaker

th Amendmentoehner advances behind as new Vice-president In 12he only alternative, the

should be struck down for perverting the original, prolkable re-blending of two parties into ottrWhite House, everyfour years, into the pendulum system swinging our Nation even further andfurther apart, everyfouryears. I n that solution, the original selection process yields Mccain andNader, as next top vote-getters, who become President and Vice-president. Choose one solution.

signed: x oated: - FJ zoy/# /5


barnett|keyes v obama (ninth circuit - 45 - received non party letter dated 04/30/2011 -...

Documents