barry barish kilc12 daegu, korea 23-april-12 global design effort director’s report grooved insert...

38
Barry Barish KILC12 Daegu, Korea 23-April-12 Global Design Effort Director’s Report Grooved Insert for CesrTA Wiggler Global Design Effort 1 23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

Upload: catherine-warren

Post on 21-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Barry BarishKILC12 Daegu, Korea23-April-12 Global Design EffortDirectors Report

    Grooved Insert forCesrTA WigglerGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • GDE Status & PlansUpdate on ILC accelerator R&D

    The Technical Design ReportTop level changesBaseline Technical Reviews ; PM level changesTDR Scope and Plans Cost EstimateProject Implementation Planning

    ILC Systems Tests

    Japanese candidate sites

    Post-TDR planning

    Global Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Major R&D Goals for Technical Design SCRFHigh Gradient R&D - globally coordinated program to demonstrate gradient by 2010 with 50%yield; improve yield to 90% by TDR (end 2012)Manufacturing: plug compatible design; industrialization, etc.Systems tests: FLASH; plus NML (FNAL), STF2 (KEK) post-TDR Test FacilitiesATF2 - Fast Kicker tests and Final Focus design/performance Delayed due to EARTHQUAKE RECOVERYCesrTA - Electron Cloud tests to establish damping ring parameters/design and electron cloud mitigation strategyFLASH Study performance using ILC-like beam and cryomodule (systems test) Future STF (KEK), NML (Fermilab)Global Design EffortGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • The ILC SCRF Cavity Achieve high gradient (35MV/m); develop multiple vendors; make cost effective, etc

    Focus is on high gradient; production yields; cryogenic losses; radiation; system performance

    Global Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Cavity Gradient Milestone2010MilestoneTDRGoalTDR goalIncludes a possible 2nd surface processSurface-process recipes include an optical inspection system, possible tumbling and mechanical repair cycleGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • ATF2 Beam size/stability and kicker testsIPShintake MonitorFinal DoubletGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Mitigating Electron Cloud

    Simulations electrodes; coating and/or grooving vacuum pipe Demonstration at CESR critical testseCloud R&DGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • CesrTA - Wiggler ObservationsIWLC2010 - CERN, Geneva, Switzerland0.002 radiusGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Proposed ILC Mitigation SchemeGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Field RegionBaseline Mitigation RecommendationAlternatives for Further InvestigationDrift*TiN CoatingSolenoid WindingsNEG CoatingDipoleGrooves with TiN CoatingAntechambers for power loads and photoelectron controlR&D into the use of clearing electrodes.Quadrupole*TiN CoatingR&D into the use of clearing electrodes or grooves with TiN coatingWigglerClearing ElectrodesAntechambers for power loads and photoelectron controlGrooves with TiN Coating

    Global Design Effort

  • Global Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • FLASH: Stability15 consecutive studies shifts (120hrs), and with no downtime

    Time to restore 400us bunch-trains after beam-off studies: ~10mins

    Energy stability with beam loading over periods of hours: ~0.02%

    Individual cavity tilts equally stableGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • View of STF phase-2 tunnelSTF Systems Tests at KEKGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Fermilab NML SRFSystems TestsFermilab NML: RF Unit Test FacilityGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Establishing Baseline for the TDRGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Technical Design PhaseAD&I studies20092010 RDR ACD concepts R&D Demonstrations TDP Baseline Technical Design201120122013RDR BaselineBeijing WorkshopTDRTDP-1TDP-2ChangeRequestSB2009 evolvechange control processAAPPACPhysicsCERN WorkshopGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, KoreaWriteReviews

    Global Design Effort

  • Top Level Change Control ProcessGlobal Design Effort*keywords: open, transparent*Global Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Proposed Design changes for TDRRDRSB2009 Single Tunnel for main linac

    Move positron source to end of linac ***

    Reduce number of bunches factor of two (lower power) **

    Reduce size of damping rings (3.2km)

    Integrate central region

    Global Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Impact of Top Level ChangesGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Evolution from SB2009 to TDR Baseline Technical ReviewsGDE-EC, PM-Rep, 120209ML-SCRF BTR, KEK*

    Technical AreaPlace and DatesSB2009Proposed Dec. 2009BAW-11. Acc. Gradient, 2. Single tunnel, KEK, Sept. 7-10, 2010BAW-23. Reduced RF Power,4. e+ source location SLAC, Jan. 17-21, 2011BTR-1DRINFN, July, 7-8, 2011 BTR-2RTML, Sources, BDS/MDIDESY, Oct. 24-28, 2011BTR-3ML & SCRFKEK, Jan. 19-20, 2012BTR-4CFSCERN, March 22-23, 2012

    ML-SCRF BTR, KEK

  • Detailed Technical-change Decisions SummaryML: lattice design w/ the cavity-string of {9+4Q4+9} = 26 (in KCS) or 1.5x 26 = 39 in RDR-like RF,HLRF: KCS w/ flat-land geology, and RDR-like w/ mountain geology Cryomodule: RDR-like (9+4Q4+9) w/ SCQ at center, and w/ simplification of 5 K shieldCryogenics: 2 x 5 plants, w/ limited tilting, and w/ variation (< 20%) of spacing b/w plants,Cavity Integration: Cavity; Tesla + Blade tuner, magnetic shield inside, Cavity gradient: 35+/-20% MV/m w/ production yield of 90 %, w. updated recipes and yield definition, resulting operational gradient 31.5 MV/m +/-20 % (with KCS or RDR-like RF and > 12 % RF power overhead)Cryomodule col tests: in reasonable rate (1/3 ~ ) in cost-balance, and w/ the following overhead, ML-CFS: tunnel-extension to keep energy overhead up to ~ 1.4 % (~150 m) Corresponding to 2 x SB2009-RDR-RF units, 2 x 39 cavities per side , (+ 150 m tunnel / linac), If tunnel tilting required, additional length of ~ 100 m / 0.5 % required, and the energy overhead not available, the ML length to be fixed under constraint of balance of timing issues b/w electron and positron, This to be well discussed with detector/physic community and GDE-EC, PM-Rep, 120209ML-SCRF BTR, KEK*

    ML-SCRF BTR, KEK

  • Global Plan for ILC Gradient R&DNew baseline gradient:Vertical acceptance: 35 MV/m average, allowing 20% spread (28-42 MV/m)Operational: 31.5 MV/m average, allowing 20% spread (25-38 MV/m)Global Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Starting Point is the RDR CostsGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • ILC RDR Value Costing*Cavity & CM Ass.RF Sys.Cryo. & OthersCavitiesGDE-EC, PM-Rep, 120209ML-SCRF BTR, KEK

    ML-SCRF BTR, KEK

  • OECD PPP (Yen/USD)-annual average by yearEX-exchange rateGDP: PPP based on all goods/services in GDP of each regionM&E: PPP based on machinery and equipmentConst: PPP based on civil constructionFull PPP determinations were done for 2005 and 2008; other year points based on GDP inflation ratesPPP = Purchasing Power ParityGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • TDR Technical VolumesReference Design ReportILC Technical Progress Report (interim report)TDR Part I:R&DTDR Part II: Baseline Reference ReportTechnical Design Report~250 pages Deliverable 2~300 pages Deliverables 1,3 and 4* end of 2012 formal publication early 2013AD&IGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • EDMS & Tech. Design DocumentationImportant goal to consolidate all technical documentation in EDMS in a structured fashionGlobal Design Effort*2-Feb-12 ILCSC - Oxford

    Global Design Effort

  • Project Implementation PlanningGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Two Candidate Sites in Asia/JapanGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • *Grooved Insert forCesrTA WigglerGlobal Design EffortNew Tunnel Shape23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Underground Power StationGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Geological SamplesGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Extending the energy of the ILCContinued R&D especially SCRFSystems TestsOrganization? (ILCSC)Post TDRGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • CYTechnical Design Report completeBaseline established201120122013201420162010ILC2015Technical design & R&D program20172018ILC possible timelineSRF system testsTDR reviewsSite EOIsCost EstimatingDecision to proceedSite/host establishedProject Implementation Plan completeXFEL operationLHCPhysics Run 1Physics Run 2Interconnect repairExistence of low-lying SUSY knownHiggs energy scale knowntimegapGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • CYTechnical Design Report completeBaseline established201120122013201420162010ILC2015Technical design & R&D program20172018ILC possible timelineSRF system testsTDR reviewsSite EOIsCost EstimatingDecision to proceedSite/host establishedProject Implementation Plan completeXFEL operationLHCPhysics Run 1Physics Run 2Interconnect repairExistence of low-lying SUSY knownHiggs energy scale knowntimegapGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • ICFA LC Parameters subcommittee (2003 and 2006)Extending the reach of the ILCGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • Post-TDR ILC Interim Goals & Organization

    What should follow GDE (mandate and organization) for an interim 3-5 year period? (ILCSC Bagger)

    GDE position paper submitted to ILCSC Aug 2011. The paper addresses:Technical Goals proposed for 2012+ program?Value engineering; Continued system demonstrations; Increasing energy reach; + Organizational Issues for 2012+ post GDE? What are primary GDE assets that should be preserved?What are the primary GDE weaknesses that should be improved?FALC common fund budget for GDE is to complete mandate in mid-2013. 23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, KoreaGlobal Design Effort*

    Global Design Effort

  • ILC Timeline Post-GDE Transition20112012201320142015Establish BaselineTDRTDRchange control process TDR draft TDR Baseline TDR FINALOn-going R&D & DesignPost-GDE Era????? Goals????? R&D ????Post-GDEGDEGlobal Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

  • GDE ConclusionsThe major R&D milestones for TDR are in-hand

    The TDR will be a self-contained comprehensive R&D report; with a design based on new baseline; a new value costing; and a section on project implementation planningSubmit: Dec 2012; Reviews of technical design & costs; rewrite as needed; submit to ICFA at LP2013 in June 2013 (GDE mandate complete)

    Envision postTDR ILC program: 1) extend energy reach; 2) systems tests; 3) evolve design based on technology development and LHC results (eg. Higgs Factory?)

    Global Design Effort*23-April-12 KILC - Daegu, Korea

    Global Design Effort

    *************