Video Surveillance and Strata Corporations PAGE 12

PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX | JOINT TENANTS | SHARED PROPERTY OWNERSHIP

JUNE 2013 | www.cba.org/bc

2 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

EVENTSBARTALK EDITOR Deborah Carfrae

EDITORIAL BOARD CHAIR Michael Welsh

EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS Candice Alderson

Sandra Harper Ellen Hong Oana Hyatt

David Madani Gail McKay

Sarah Nelligan Clint Sadlemyer, QC

Rose Shawlee

BARTALK SENIOR EDITOR Maureen Cameron

STAFF CONTRIBUTORS

Darcy Brennan Simon Bursell

Judy Cave Tanya Galic

Catherine Lau Carol Nnamanda

Stuart Rennie Jennifer Weber

Judy Yen

The B.C. Branch of the Canadian Bar Association, 10th Floor, 845 Cambie St.

Vancouver, B.C. V6B 5T3

Tel: 604-687-3404Toll-free (in B.C.): 1-888-687-3404

bartalk@bccba.org

BarTalk is published six times per year by the British Columbia Branch of the Canadian Bar Association and is available online at www.cba.org/bc.

© Copyright the British Columbia Branch of the Canadian Bar Association 2013.

This publication is intended for infor-mation purposes only and the infor-mation herein should not be applied to specific fact circumstances with-out the advice of counsel.

The British Columbia Branch of the Canadian Bar Association represents more than 6,900 B.C. members and is dedicated to improving and pro-moting access to justice, reviewing legislation, initiating law reform measures and advancing and improv-ing the administration of justice.

BarTalk Publication Sales Agreement #40741008

THE 17TH ANNUAL VANCOUVER BAR ASSOCIATION/B.C. BRANCH OF THE CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION GOLF TOURNAMENTis on Thursday, August 15 at the University Golf Club. Check in/registration is from 11:30 a.m.- 12:45 p.m. and tee time is at 1:00 p.m. Participate in this fun-filled day of golf and prizes, and support law student scholarships.

\\ For registration forms, go to: www.cba.org/bc/pdf/events/van_golf_tournament.pdf THE 2013 NEW WESTMIN-STER/FRASER VALLEY BARS GOLF TOURNAMENT is scheduled to take place at Guildford Golf Course in Surrey on Thursday, July 4 with tee times starting at 11:00 a.m. Lawyers, judges, court reporters and their friends are welcome. Cost is $95 per person for golf, dinner and prizes. Carts can be rented from the course. Options include stroke play or Texas Scramble. For further information, contact Rick Molstad at molstad.rick@gmail.com.

UPCOMING EVENTS

Fore!LAW WEEK 2013KELOWNA – April 17, 2013

KAMLOOPS – April 23, 2013

Volunteers in Kelowna, including lawyers, RCMP and Sheriffs, partici-pated in the Girl Guide Arrests, which taught the Girl Guides about the judicial system in British Columbia.

Participants of a mock trial, which was based on Jack and the Beanstalk.

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 3

ContentsVOLUME 25 / NUMBER 3JUNE 2013

Departments4 FROM THE PRESIDENT Envisioning Equal Justice by Kerry L. Simmons

5 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Choice. Value. Engagement. by Caroline Nevin

6 PRACTICE TALK Dealing with Difficult People by David J. Bilinsky

7 DAVE’S TECH TIPS

8 NOTHING OFFICIAL Memo From the Partners by Tony Wilson

Sections 10 SECTION UPDATE Commercial and Real Estate Vancouver Island Public Sector Lawyers and Criminal Justice Victoria Real Property Vancouver

11 SECTION NEWS Chatter with Chairs

Guest9 BEYOND DIVERSITY: CREATING AN INCLUSIVE PROFESSION by Nicole Byres

Features12 VIDEO SURVEILLANCE AND STRATA CORPORATIONS by Bradley Weldon

13 DEPRECIATION REPORTS & STRATA CORPORATIONS by Allyson Baker

14 HOW TO END SHARED PROPERTY OWNERSHIP by Peter J. Roberts

15 GUARANTEEING PERFORMANCE by Carlos S. Mendes

16 PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX by Krystle Gill

17 DANGEROUSLY SIMPLE by Genevieve N. Taylor

Inside This IssueGive me land, lots of land. So says the song. We explore the perils of purchase – forfeited deposits, PPT and putting the kids on title; issues facing strata corporations with privacy laws and depreciation re-ports; divergent caselaw on the Partition of Property Act. We finish with thoughts on diversity issues and difficult people.

News and Events2 Fore! – Upcoming 2013 Golf Tournaments Law Week 2013 Photos – Kelowna and Kamloops 18 Three Chief Justices Share Their Collective Wisdom at Eric Hamber Secondary Law Forum During Law Week BCAMI Arbitration and Mediation Symposium B.C. Court of Appeal Decision Upholds Lawyers’ Duty to Clients 19 CBA’s Legal Futures Initiative Aims to Lay Foundation for New Way to Practice Law CBA Legal Conference, Saskatoon – Aug. 18-20, 2013 CCCA & Rotman School of Management Partner to Create In-House Certification Program 20 2013 CBABC Annual Branch Conference San Diego, California – Nov. 15-17, 2013 CLEBC Update Lawyer Referral Service (LRS) 21 Legislative Update Branch & Bar Calendar Congratulations Andrea S. Donohoe 22 Tips from Courthouse Libraries BC Law Week 2013 Photos – Fort St. John and Vancouver Practice Tip for the Civil Litigator in Small Claims Court Also In This Issue11 MEMBER SERVICES23 LAW FOUNDATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA24 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT25 DISPLAY ADS

26 BAR MOVES

27 NEW MEMBERS

4 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

might face in his or her day-to-day life. Each character was part of a family that received information about whether or not the family had income, how much they had to pay for rent, utilities, food, child care, etc., and then was given the task of trying to survive the next hour which represented a month in the life of that family.

The fifteen or so families in the simulation lived in a town with a general employer, child care centre, family resource centre, welfare office, bank, mortgage company, loan company, pawn shop, dollar store, grocery store, jail, school, police, group home, homeless shelter and juvenile hall. These services and institutions surrounded the residences and to access a service (e.g. family re-source centre) the character had to produce a transportation voucher that represented the cost of access-ing the services.

My character was Francesca, a 14-year-old girl. At school, where there weren’t enough seats, I didn’t

get much attention from the teachers and was sent home with a request for money for a field trip. My 17-year-old brother discovered he was go-ing to become a father. He wasn’t in school and didn’t have a job. My mother had to apply for welfare and try to pay the bills with the lim-ited amount of money she received. I was successful at pawning our television to get $30. I tried, un-successfully, to get a part-time job.

At the end of the hour, we dis-cussed our experiences. Partici-pants explained how hard it was to fill in the forms required for jobs or welfare. They encoun-tered service providers who were overwhelmed and were frequently disorganized. They often had to break the law or lie in order to survive. There were stories of chil-dren being left to reside in a group home because at least there they would be fed. Those with legal problems accessed the legal office the day before their court hearing

because until that point, they were focussing on surviving and getting legal help wasn’t a critical priority.

Our experiences in this simulation were just the tip of the iceberg of what many people who live in pov-erty or have low income experience. With this in mind, we moved into

plenary sessions and workshops to learn of and discuss solutions and ideas that work.

These ranged from how law school clinical programs and experi-ential learning could be better utilized to pro-vide access to justice, to how to measure jus-tice initiatives, to suc-

cessful uses of technology. To learn more, go to www.cba.org.

Dr. Melina Buckley of Camp Fiorante Matthews Mogerman leads the CBA Access to Justice in-itiative, which collaborates with the National Action Committee on Ac-cess to Justice chaired by SCC Justice Thomas Cromwell. I had the hon-our of introducing him at the Sum-mit. His words of encouragement to press forward to make changes and implement this work were a great boost of energy to the many partici-pants who make this issue part of their professional contributions.

Kerry L. Simmons president@bccba.org

FROM THE PRESIDENTKERRY L. SIMMONS

Envisioning Equal Justice Ready to activate!

Let me share with you one of the most recent initiatives of the legal profession to address access to justice and improve the public’s experience with the justice system.

At the end of April, the CBA hosted the Envisioning Equal Justice Summit in Vancouver. From coast to coast to coast, over 200 representatives of the private bar, legal aid, gov-ernment, policy advisors, judges, CBA leadership, benchers,

academics, law students, international thinkers, pro bono, community advocates, and the public shared information and ideas over the three-day Summit.

The Summit kicked off with a poverty law simulation developed by United Way Winnipeg and executed with the support of Access Pro Bono volunteers. Registrants were in-vited to take on a character and experience what that person

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 5

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORCAROLINE NEVIN

Choice. Value. Engagement. New options and rewards with CBA membership

When the CBA decided to take a hard look at how and what the CBA delivers in terms of member-ship value, we knew that talking to members was the only means by which we could get a realistic assessment of where we are now and where we need to go. The end result of our in-depth exploration is a series of changes that have been in the works these past 18 months and are about to become very public as of this summer.

What’s new? First, because we know that you rely on your CBA membership for access to prac-tical, cost-effective professional development, we’re offering you upfront 20 per cent discounts on new packages of PD and Sections as a thank you for membership. On top of that, we’re providing rewards of between three and five per cent on anything else you pur-chase from us, as a straight reduc-tion on your membership renewal cost the following year. And the third big change is a revamping of our membership categories

to become more inclu-sive of, and respon-sive to, the diversity of the profession.

As an example, in B.C., there are 1,422 lawyers who have chosen “non-practis-ing” status with the Law Society, 1,108 who are insured as “part time” practitioners and 658 who are “retired” and still Law Soci-ety members. Combined, that’s a whopping 25 per cent of the entire Law Society membership who are not the classic full-time practition-ers for whom the CBA originally designed our membership offer-ings. What we know now is that there is a huge appetite for access to our services (particularly with mandatory CPD) and a strong de-sire to remain connected to the legal profession. What’s been mis-sing is a cost-effective way to do that through the CBA.

So, now, if you are a non-practising, part-time or retired member of the Law Society, you will be able to access all of the

services, programs, advocacy and volunteer opportunities that the CBA provides, for half the price of regular membership. If you are a new lawyer in your first three years of call, we’re offer-ing an even bigger discount: 60 per cent off the regular price, be-

cause we know that the first few years are when you are work-ing hard to establish yourself and build your own network.

No matter your age or practice status, we want you to have the chance to engage in the life of the legal community, and to

have access to the people and op-portunities that make your pro-fessional life as meaningful and rewarding as possible. We also want your expertise, your ex-perience and your perspective on the law and legal issues, because the CBA is constantly called on to influence the development of law and policy. We offer great opportunities to get involved and have a real impact in the world. Please take a moment to consider the value of CBA mem-bership, and renew or sign up at cba.org/membership.

Sometimes, in order to move forward you just have to make a decision – any decision. Most times, though, it pays to do your research first. At the CBA, we’ve just finished a big research and shake-up process that aims to make membership more valuable, more responsive, and more practical in terms of rewarding the choice to belong.

The Canadian Bar Association is an institution – by definition, an “established organization... long associated with a specif-ic function.” Institutions are long-lived in part because they tend to take the long view of their position in society and thus stand strong against the buffeting winds of short-term pres-sures. That stability is a genuine strength but also a potential weakness if you want to be nimble and move quickly in re-sponse to change. The trick is to be both strong and flexible.

Caroline Nevin cnevin@bccba.org

6 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

GO ONLINE FOR MORE INFORMATION

DAVID J. BILINSKY

practicetalkDealing with Difficult People Making good choices in a bad situation

reaction into a battle of two egos. We end up responding to a tussle of who is right?

As a practice advisor I see this scenario played out all the time. Giving objective advice when one is on the outside is completely dif-ferent from being on the inside. Having had a recent personal en-counter in such a situation, I can say that it is much harder to make the right decisions when you are the one involved. I went searching for answers. So here are some tips that I have found for helping to make the right choice:�� Anger feeds anger: This is a downward spiral that causes us to feel more compelled to de-fend ourselves the angrier our thoughts become.�� It is about them: Most times negativity is a reflection of the other person’s inner state. It isn’t about you – you just hap-pen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. They are frustrated, angry and in con-flict and they are looking for

someone to take down with them. �� It is a waste of energy: Do we real-ly want to invest all that time and emotional energy in responding?�� It is going to affect you: If the fight response emerges, you are going to drag that negativ-ity into other parts of your life when you get home. Do you really want to poison your posi-tive home life this way?�� You can choose: Ultimately, you can’t control what people do and say; what you can decide is how you react. You can choose a better way.�� Wait it out: Draft the response letter and lock it away in a drawer for Monday. Chances are by then you will have differ-ent – more rational – options to deal with this person.�� Forgive: Yes forgive. If you don’t then the negativity takes hold inside you.�� Go for a run: Get away from

the situation and expend some physical energy. You will feel better for it.�� Best/Worst case analysis: Nego-tiation theory speaks of BAT-NAs: The Best Alternative to a Negotiated Situation. What is the best and worst case scenar-

ios if you do and do not respond. �� Evaluate from your

perspective: Recall that this person is trying to draw you into their game plan. Ask your-self: Will responding to this person advance the things that are most important to me?�� Look for the lesson:

Inside each difficult situation is something that will help you grow as a person. Don’t lose the opportunity.�� Let go: Write out all your thoughts about this situation – roll the paper into a ball and throw it away. Now – carry on with your life!Responding to mad people is

not easy. If it was, then the world wouldn’t have negative people running in circles making life dif-ficult for others.

r When people run in circles It’s a very very

Mad world, mad world… r

– Music and Lyrics by Tears for Fears, recorded by: Michael Andrews & Gary Jules

All of us are DNA hardwired for “fight or flight.” Being lawyers, the fight option has been honed to a fine edge. However, there are times when the other option may be the better option. It is inevitable that we are going to encounter people who attack us, counter us, oppose our ideas or simply do not like us. Our im-

mediate impulse is to react and attack. It is not easy but ul-timately fighting is not the best reaction – it turns a one-sided

David J. Bilinsky is the Practice Management Advisor for the Law Society of British Columbia. Email: daveb@lsbc.org Blog: www.thoughtfullaw.com

The views expressed herein are strictly those of the author and may not be shared by the Law Society of British Columbia.

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 7

Where do you go for advice on how to deal with difficult people? Here are some websites you can visit for assistance.

PPC CANADA (Formerly called Interlock EAP www.ca.ppcworldwide.com or 1-800-663-9099)

Personal Performance Con-sultants (PPC Canada) offers confidential services to B.C. law-yers and articled students and their immediate families at no cost courtesy of the Law Society of B.C.

PPC can help with personal, relationship and family problems, stress management, substance abuse or work-related concerns.

LAWYERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (L.A.P.) (www.lapbc.com, 604-685-2171 or 1-888-685-2171)

Derek LaCroix and his volun-teers at The Lawyers Assistance Program provide confidential support, counselling, referrals and peer interventions for lawyers, their families, support staff and articled students who need help to deal with alcohol or chemical dependencies, stress, depression or other personal problems.

Based on the concept of “lawyers helping lawyers” the Lawyers Assistance Program relies on a network of volunteers from the B.C. legal community. While the Law Society funds this program as a service to the profession, L.A.P. is entirely in-dependent and all inquiries and interactions are strictly confi-dential from the Law Society.

COLORADO STATE LIBRARY (CSL) (http://bit.ly/Ny3p54)

Jean Marie Heilig at the CSL has compiled a list of written and video resources on the web on different approaches to dealing with difficult people in different situations.

BURLINGTON COUNTY COLLEGE CAREER SERVICES (http://bit.ly/16v2WtI)

Burlington County College has a great PowerPoint (link above) that breaks down the types of difficult people that you may encounter and suggests positive ways of dealing with each type.

FREE MANAGEMENT LIBRARY (http://bit.ly/10Ehakx)

This website is just a wealth of information on all aspects of management and one of my favorites. The link above will take you to their great infor-mation on different aspects of handling difficult people.

© 2013 David J. Bilinsky

dave’s techtips

LFBC NEWS

Residential Tenancy and Housing Advocates

As part of its mandate to support legal aid in B.C., the Law Foundation of British Columbia (LFBC) funds legal advocates who work on housing issues, as well as other poverty law matters.

One of the main groups providing information about residential tenancy and other housing issues in B.C. is TRAC Tenant Resource & Advisory Centre. This group provides B.C. tenants and advocates with free legal information about residential tenancy law through a tenant Infoline, website (www.tenants.bc.ca), social media, multilingual resources, and legal education workshops. In 2012, TRAC answered more than 8,000 inquiries from the public and advocates.

Another organization that works in this area is the Kettle Friendship Society, which provides housing advocacy and representation for tenants with mental health disabilities. Through its residential tenancy advocacy program, the Kettle educates tenants about their rights and responsibilities, empowers tenants to make use of the resources available to them, advises tenants on their options, and often represents tenants at dispute resolution hearings.

8 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

nothingofficialTONY WILSON

Memo From the Partners Animal Law Protocols

can bring their pets while they await meetings with our lawyers. (The articling students will be responsible for maintaining weekly servicing of the kitty litter box).

We are also interested in the cross-marketing opportunities that can come with having a large num-ber of animals in the firm’s wait-ing lounge, including the potential for offering veterinary services, pet grooming, safaris and the like.

As we expect to be defending many dog owners whose pit bulls have gone psycho and have mauled or eaten a neighbour’s Shih-Tzu (including some dog owners who ride motorcycles, have very large parts of their bodies covered in tattoos and operate strip clubs and grow-ops), we advise all lawyers and staff to be careful, just in case these dogs take a chunk out of you too. Pit bulls are a misunderstood breed. They’re wonderful dogs, unless they aren’t; in which case, we’re here to defend them.

The firm is developing protocols to deal with potential conflicts with

dog and cat names, and whether our law-yers owe duties to the client or the client’s pet under the new Mod-el Code. In the meantime, we are endeavouring to make our firm “animal neutral,” which means the following expressions are now prohibited within documents, cor-respondence and in all conversa-tions in the office, given that these expressions might offend some of our new clients.

You are to refrain from using the expressions such as “it’s raining cats and dogs,” “dog days of summer” or “dog file” in the office. Someone complained last week that their of-fice was so small, “there wasn’t enough room to swing a cat.” That person no longer works for our firm. Likewise, one of our law-yers mentioned that her colleague down the hall was “batshit crazy.” Although we all know this lawyer is stark raving mad, the expression “batshit crazy” is frowned upon, as it is disrespectful to bats.

Likewise, the expressions “go-ing ape,” or as “busy as a bee” are not acceptable and may result in warning letters. “Killing two birds with one stone,” “living in a “dog-eat-dog world” or being as “hungry as a horse” suggests you are anti-animal and use of these

and similar terms will be dealt with harshly.

Going animal neu-tral will involve chan-ges to the lunchroom and client lunches as well. To that end, the firm will no longer per-mit animal products in the lunchroom fridge, nor will we allow sand-wiches delivered for

meetings that contain meat prod-ucts. Obviously, this includes beef, ham, chicken or fish products, but it also includes dairy. Thus, start-ing as of July 1, milk for coffee will be replaced with soymilk.

There are no exceptions to these rules. There are no sacred cows. We believe that Animal Law will be a growing practice area for the firm, and we must adjust our in-ternal practices and procedures accordingly. Our marketing de-partment is in the process of issu-ing press releases. Accordingly, please do not circulate informa-tion about Animal Law until ad-vised to do so. Those who let the cat out of the bag prematurely will be thrown to the wolves.

We are happy to advise members of the firm that we are boldly expanding into areas where we have never gone before to take advantage of demographic shifts and the aging baby-boom-ers. Our new practice area is “Animal Law.”

This means our Wills and Estates Department will now be acting for clients who wish to leave

their entire estates (together with huge tracks of their lands) to their parrots, their cats, their dogs and possibly other animals. In particular, it means that we may be acting for a lot of elderly ladies who have never married, but have 30 or more cats living at home with them. To that end, we have created a toll-free phone line from Victoria (where many of these “cat ladies” apparently live), and we’ve established a pet friendly area in our lounge where clients

The views expressed herein are strictly those of Tony Wilson and do not reflect the opin-ions of the Law Society of British Columbia, CBABC, or their respective members.

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 9

guestNICOLE BYRES

For many years now, law schools and the legal profession have made efforts to en-courage people of diverse backgrounds to become lawyers.

Judging by the cohorts of law stu-dents being offered positions in law firms, discrimination based on gender, race, sexual orientation, and physical disability are no longer the barriers they once were, at least at the entry level. Where the profes-sion is not doing so well however, is in achieving and maintaining di-versity at all levels. This isn’t just a problem for our profession. Or-ganizations have now realized that programs to encourage diversity are not enough – it is also necessary to create an environment in which people share a sense of belonging and mutual respect, are valued for who they are, and full participation and contribution are encouraged. In other words, diversity must go hand in hand with inclusiveness.

Inclusive law firms have a com-mitment to the retention, develop-ment, and leadership development of people of diverse perspectives. Without this, talented lawyers of diverse backgrounds will not thrive nor stay to advance through to associate, income partner, and/or equity partner levels.

In social dynamics, for change to become self-sustaining, a critical mass of individuals must adopt the new attitudes or behaviours. That is

why it is important for all organiza-tions who are engaged in the discus-sion of diversity and inclusion to take any and all opportunities to share practical and effective strategies.

The good news is that the topic of diversity and inclusion is gaining momentum. In Canada, the following programs and initiatives have been developed or are underway within the legal profession. �� In August 2012, the Canadian Bar As-sociation published Measuring Divers-ity in Law Firms: A Critical Tool for Achieving High Performance. This document explains why diversity is necessary for high performing law firms, and why measuring diversity and inclu-siveness is an important first step in creating an inclusive environment. The publication also includes helpful surveys and links to other resources re-lated to diversity and inclusion. (www.cba.org/CBA/equity/di-versity/resources.aspx) �� At the provincial level, the CBABC’s Equality and Diversity Committee, SOGIC, Aboriginal and Women Lawyers Forums also sponsor specific initiatives and programs aimed at divers-ity and inclusion. �� Law Societies in Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec

have all approved Justicia pro-jects which bring together law firms to share best practices, and to develop resources and pro-grams to support women law-yers in private practice. �� General Counsel of thirty-four companies in Canada have issued a statement of support for diversity and inclusion not only within their own organiza-tions, but within the law firms they hire as external counsel. �� More recently, several national Canadian law firms formed the Law Firm Diversity & Inclusion

Network in order to share best practices to enhance diversity and to promote inclusion.

Transforming the legal profession so it is more inclusive will not be easy but the rate of change could be faster, particularly if social media were used more effectively

by the above noted groups to dis-seminate ideas and information, and to encourage debate. Leader-ship is also important. A recent Harvard Business Review blog by Whitney Johnson and Lisa Joy Rosner called Mayer, Sand-berg, Slaughter: Driving Change, at a Cost, discusses how a critical mass of thought leaders who took risks in voicing controversial pos-itions on work and life caused a surge in social media conversa-tions, which in turn advanced the issue. As they stated: “When highly visible leaders stick their necks out, it makes it easier for the rest of us.”

Nicole Byres is the Chair of the CBABC Women Lawyers Forum and a partner at Miller Thomson LLP.

Beyond Diversity Creating an Inclusive Profession

10 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

sectionsCommercial and Real Estate Vancouver Island

uGail Reaney of Colliers Inter-national presented on issues

of concern to solicitors arranging leases on commercial properties. She explained that the slowing economy is responsible for the slow, but steady, office space market. This new pressure has provided greater incentive to target new cli-ents with unique leasing require-ments. High tech businesses are more than ever seeking creative landlords who will allow flexible use of space. Their leases tend to be short-term, as they may need to ex-pand, relocate, or even fold, within a short time-frame. They should also be concerned about any ter-mination clauses. Other lessees are looking for a space that is a good fit with their environmental concerns. This could be aimed as much at reducing their budget footprint as their carbon footprint, but the focus is usually on building a healthy work environment. US retailers are one group that are becoming increasingly aware of the en-vironmental features and effect of potential lease spaces. Gail finished by reviewing challenges that face all types of lessors, and how solicitors can assist in mitigating them.

Public Sector Lawyers and Criminal Justice Victoria

uRichard Rosenthal was ap-pointed the first Chief Civil-

ian Director of the Independent Investigations Office of B.C. in 2011, and since then his office has investigated incidents where it appears that “a person may have died or suffered serious harm as a

Real Property Vancouver

Meeting in Review: April 25, 2013 Speaker: David Mckenzie, Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP Topic: Builders Liens Tips for Solicitors

Commercial and Real Estate Vancouver Island

Meeting in Review: March 28, 2013 Speaker: Gail Reaney, Associate Vice President, Colliers International Topic: Commercial Leasing Issues for Solicitors

SECTION UPDATE

Keep Current A review of provincial Section meetings.

Public Sector Lawyers and Criminal Justice Victoria

Meeting in Review: April 11, 2013 Speaker: Richard Rosenthal, Chief Civilian Director, Independent Investigations Office of B.C. Topic: The Independent Investigations Office of British Columbia

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 11

GO ONLINE FOR MORE INFORMATION

result of the actions of an officer, whether on or off duty, or an of-ficer whether on or off duty, may have contravened a prescribed provision of the Criminal Code or a prescribed provision of another federal or provincial enactment.” Members of both Sections were invited to attend in-person in Vancouver, or participate by video-link in Victoria. Mr. Rosen-thal provided an overview of the successes and challenges faced by his office since its very recent inception, and took questions from Section members on how the relevant sections of the Police Act, excerpted above, are being inter-preted. A webinar recording of this meeting is available to mem-bers of the Public Sector Lawyers Section and the Criminal Justice – Victoria Section and is included with the minutes posted online.

Real Property Vancouver

u\Speaking to the Real Property – Vancouver Section in April,

David Mckenzie of Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP provided an overview of liens, how they are

used in the construction industry and who may use them, as well as helpful advice on the filing process and example scenarios. In Brit-ish Columbia liens are governed by the Builders Lien Act. David was keen to clear up any miscon-ceptions, explaining that while a lien is a remedy that is available when an improvement has been made to a property, improvement should not be taken to strictly mean changes which add to the property’s value. The Section also heard how they can use their understanding of builders liens to ensure the contracts they draft for parties involved in construction projects offer the greatest protec-tion. A webinar recording of this meeting is available to members of the Real Property –Vancouver Section and is included with the minutes posted online.

For enrolled CBA members, more detailed information and available minutes from the Section meet-ings are online at www.cba.org/bc in CBABC Forums and Sections under Professional Development.

SECTION NEWS

Chatter with Chairs — Shannon Mather, Chair

YOUNG LAWYERS VICTORIAThis year our Section has continued its focus on building a

strong collegial atmosphere among the young lawyers of Victoria by having a variety of educational and social events. We have also reached out to several other Victoria Sections to encour-age the transfer of know-ledge. In March, we were fortunate to have Justice Macaulay dine with a small number of our members and we are organizing a similar informal dinner in July with Judge Brian Neal, the associ-ate Chief Judge of Provin-cial Court. Our executive is looking forward to all of our upcoming Section meetings and social events, culminat-ing in the 3rd Annual Golf Tournament on July 18.

EMAIL: MEMBERS@BCCBA.ORG

memberservicesSeasonal promotions and special offers to members are promoted weekly via CBABC News and Jobs. Visit the CBABC website for links to various activities and promotions on the Member Savings page from the drop down list under Membership.

\\ STILL CREEK PRESS is pleased to offer CBABC members preferential rates on all printing services. They look forward to assisting you with print solutions.

\\ CBA FINANCIAL SERVICES (CBAF) provides investment and savings products designed specifically for and available exclusively to, lawyers, law firm staff, and their families. CBA members receive an additional discount of 0.40 per cent discount on Investment Management Fees.

12 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

BRADLEY WELDON

features

More strata corpora-tions are using video surveillance systems as the cost to deploy them de-

creases and their capabilities im-prove. The use of video cameras to collect personal information brings with it a particular sub-set of privacy issues related to the in-trusiveness of the collection and the potential cost of responding to access requests for personal information. While the deploy-ment of a video surveillance sys-tem may be justified in some cir-cumstances, strata corporations should consider whether the legal obligations that accompany their use are proportional to the perceived benefit.

When video cameras record im-ages of individuals they are col-lecting personal information. This collection, as well as any sub-sequent use or disclosure, must comply with British Columbia’s Personal Information Protection Act (“PIPA”). A strata corpora-tion may comply with PIPA by authorizing the collection of per-sonal information through bylaw, pursuant to the Strata Property Act. If no such bylaw is enacted then the collection must be other-wise authorized by PIPA.

COLLECTION MUST BE REASONABLEIn order for collection to be authorised by PIPA, the purpose

for the video surveillance must be one which a reasonable per-son would consider appropriate in the circumstances, and the in-dividuals whose images are being recorded must be notified of this purpose on or before being re-corded. The Office of the Information and Privacy Commission-er considered the use of video surveillance by the Shoal Point Strata Council in Or-der P09-02. In that Order the adjudicator held that the use of video cameras to pro-tect the security of the building was reasonable, but its use for strata bylaw enforcement was not. The adjudicator found that video surveillance consti-tutes a substantial invasion of individuals’ privacy and should only be used in response to a real and significant security or safety problem. The use of video cam-eras to enforce strata bylaws did not meet this threshold because bylaw violations are not suffi-ciently serious to warrant the in-vasion of privacy. Further, while it was reasonable to use video cameras to monitor the build-ing’s exterior doors for security, the adjudicator ordered that the video system must not be actively monitored or routinely reviewed, but only accessed in response to a reported incident.

RETENTION CAN BE COSTLYPIPA requires that personal in-formation must only be retained until the purpose for which it was collected is no longer being served by its retention. For example, the Shoal Point Order found that keeping video footage for three weeks was reasonable. Strata cor-porations should also be mindful of the potential financial cost of retaining personal information. PIPA provides individuals with the right to request access to their own personal information that is in the control of an organization,

but an organization cannot disclose the personal information of third parties. In the context of a video re-cord, this means that a strata corporation must provide indi-viduals with access to any video that con-tains their image, but the image of any third

party must be blurred or blacked out. The cost of processing video records to anonymize third par-ties could rapidly eclipse the fi-nancial benefit of deploying video surveillance. To reduce this lia-bility, strata corporations should regularly review their data reten-tion schedules to ensure that they retain only the minimal amount of personal information neces-sary to fulfill the purpose of the original collection.

The Information and Privacy Commissioner has released Guide-lines for Strata Corporations, available at www.oipc.bc.ca.

Video records are personal information

Video Surveillance and Strata Corporations

Bradley Weldon is a lawyer and policy analyst at the Office of the Information and Privacy Commis-sioner for British Columbia.

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 13

Strata councils, owners and property managers have struggled with adequate planning to address the aging of a

condominium complex. Although the strata property related legis-lation in B.C. has long required strata corporations to establish and maintain contingency reserve funds (CRF) for common expens-es that usually occur less often than once a year or do not usually occur, the legislation provided lit-tle guidance to strata corporations as to how to assess the long-term repair, maintenance and replace-ment requirements of the complex and the anticipated costs associ-ated with same.

The Strata Property Act (the “SPA”), which was brought into force in 2000, included provi-sions permitting, but not requir-ing, a strata corporation to obtain a depreciation report. While there was nothing in the predecessor legislation prior to 2000 that pre-vented a strata corporation from obtaining such a report, including a specific reference to a “deprecia-tion report” was a significant step in introducing the notion of long-term planning based on the needs of the particular complex.

Since 2009, the SPA and the Strata Property Regulation have been further amended to impose a requirement on all strata cor-porations (other than those con-taining fewer than five units) to

obtain a depreciation report. As of December 13, 2013, a strata cor-poration that existed on or before December 14, 2011 is required to have either:�� obtained a depreciation report that meets the requirements of the regulation; or�� adopted a ¾ vote resolution pursuant to section 94(3) that exempts the strata corporation from the obligation to ob-tain the report for a period of 18 months from the date of the resolution (a “s. 94(3) Resolution”).Strata corporations that came

into existence after December 11, 2011 are required to ob-tain a depreciation report or pass a s. 94(3) Resolution within six months after the date of the second annual general meeting.

Thereafter, all strata corpora-tion are required to update their depreciation reports within three years of the last report date or adopt a s. 94 Resolution.

The requirements for the prep-aration and contents of a deprecia-tion report are set out in Section 6.2 of the Strata Property Regulation.

It should be noted that, while the depreciation report will pro-vide information on the antici-pated long-term funding require-ments for a particular strata cor-poration, there is no obligation

on the part of the strata corpor-ation to fund the CRF to reflect that information. Although a strata corporation no longer has to obtain a ¾ vote resolution in order to “overcontribute” to the CRF (i.e. continue making con-tributions once the amount in the CRF equals or exceeds the annual operating budget for the strata corporation), the minimum contribution requirements re-main tied to the annual operat-ing budget – a figure that typical-ly bears no relation to long-term financial needs.

The SPA does not contain any specific provisions to address what happens if a strata corporation fails to either obtain a depreciation report or exempt itself from the requirement to do so. While an owner could apply to court for an order requir-

ing a strata corporation to obtain a depreciation report, it is antici-pated, based on the experiences of other jurisdictions that have adopted similar requirements, that the marketplace (being the purchase and sale of strata lots, as well as the ability of a strata corporation to obtain financing or insurance) will likely provide a greater incentive for a strata cor-poration to obtain a depreciation report and increase contributions to its CRF based on the recom-mendations of the report.

Depreciation Reports & Strata Corporations A tool for long-term planning

Allyson Baker is an associate at Clark Wilson LLP and co-editor of the CLE Strata Property Act Practice Manual and author or co-author of the chap-ters regarding rentals, insurance, employment and duty to repair.

ALLYSON BAKER

14 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

Two friends buy a piece of property to build equity and have a home. They share all the expenses.

Things go well and their equity increases. Eventually, one needs his money to invest in a business but the other won’t agree to sell. Who prevails?

This is a common scenario. In the absence of a settlement or a written agreement governing the situation, the only recourse is to the courts. The Partition of Prop-erty Act (“PPA”) provides the court with authority to “direct a sale of the property and a distri-bution of the proceeds.” To pre-vent a sale, it must be established that there is “good reason” and that a sale “would not do justice between the parties.” The onus of showing this is on the party op-posing the sale. The courts have a broad and unfettered discretion in considering these issues.

Two recent cases illustrate op-posite results under the PPA.

The first is Borg v. Morris, 2012 BCSC 554, and involved the scen-ario described above. One co-owner opposed the property sale and could not buy the other out. He opposed because the prop-erty was his home, there were un-resolved financial issues and a sale would cause a significant mort-gage prepayment penalty. The court ordered the sale and noted the chance of a future sale had

always existed. The unresolved fi-nancial issues could be adjudicat-ed later. It was always possible for the basis of the original agreement to change. That would always cause prejudice: one risked losing his home and the other access to his equity. As the com-peting hardships were equal, there was no “good reason” against selling the property. It was sold, subject to an accounting.

The second case is Cypress Gardens, 2012 BCSC 454. Cy-press Gardens is a common law condo development of 177 units owned by 135 different owners. Each

was a “co-owner” of the entire complex. Some owners applied to have the property sold to a de-veloper. Most other owners op-posed. The court noted that the facts and circumstances of each

case must be examined to deter-mine whether good reason existed to refuse a sale. There is no gen-eral rule circumscribing the types of reasons that justify refusing to order a sale. Those reasons can include “serious hardship” and lack of “good faith, vexatious-ness or maliciousness” by an ap-plicant. Here, a sale would “force particularly vulnerable people out of their homes, including young children, single parents, the elder-ly, the infirm, and people of very limited financial means.” Many could not afford comparable

property nearby and be forced to rent or move away. The court found there was a rea-sonable understand-ing among all owners that they were buying individual homes and not simply fraction-al interests in a lar-ger complex. All this amounted to “good

reason” not to order a sale. Joint ownership of land is ex-

tremely common. If you wish to avoid the prospect of an involun-tary sale in future, it is best to set out in writing how and when the property may be sold. On the other hand, if you find yourself tied into joint property ownership and cannot reach consensus on what to do, there is recourse to the courts to have the property sold.

PETER J. ROBERTS

How to End Shared Property Ownership Partition of Property Act

Peter J. Roberts, Partner, Lawson Lundell LLP. Peter is a litigator with a wide range of experience, practising for more than 21 years in Vancouver. For a number of years he practised criminal law before resuming civil and com-mercial litigation, including claims involving allegations of fraud.

features

Joint ownership of land is extremely

common. If you wish to avoid the pros-pect of an involun-tary sale in future, it is best to set out in writing how and when the property

may be sold.

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 15

The B.C. Court of Ap-peal recently provided some welcome insight into a contractual pro-vision that most mem-

bers of the Vancouver Real Estate Bar have seen, but that few have ever really taken the time to con-sider. In Tang v. Zhang, 2013, BCCA 52 the court was asked whether the Greater Vancouver Real Estate Board’s standard form Contract of Purchase and Sale gives a seller the unconditional right to keep a deposit when a buyer’s breach has not caused the seller to suffer any demonstrable pecuniary loss. Specifically at issue was the “time of the essence” clause, which states that if the buyer fails to complete, the seller can terminate the contract, and the amount paid by the buyer as a deposit “will be absolutely for-feited to the seller... on account of damages, without prejudice to the seller’s other remedies.”

Importantly, when the buyer in Tang failed to complete, the seller put the subject property back on the market and managed to sell it to a third party for a higher price. In the meantime, the seller com-menced its action in B.C. Supreme Court, seeking a declaration that the deposit became “absolutely forfeited” following the buyer’s breach, and an order that it be released by the agent holding it. Following the B.C. Court of Ap-peal’s 2009 decision in Agnosti v.

Winter, 2009 BCCA 490, the trial judge held that the provision cited above did not give the seller an unconditional right to the full de-posit, but rather created the right to claim for proven damages out of the deposit funds. Consequent-ly, since the sellers did not suffer any demon-strable pecuniary loss, the trial judge held that the buyer was en-titled to the return of the deposit.

Writing for a five-justice panel of the Court of Appeal, Madam Justice New-bury noted that the drafters of standard form con-tracts should be assumed to have

been mindful of the common law in their drafting, and that as a result, the language of standard form contracts should always be construed in the light of its mean-ing at common law. To this end, the court considers the seminal English case, Howe v. Smith,

(1884), [1881-5] All E.R. Rep. 201, noting that in the absence of a manifest contrary intention, de-posit payments are held as a guar-antee of a purchaser’s perform-ance and cannot be recovered by that same purchaser following his or her breach.

Reversing the trial judge’s de-cision, and holding that Agnosti was wrongly decided, the court concluded its reasons by noting that contractual provisions that state a deposit will be forfeited “on account of damages” do not change the nature of deposits as

enunciated in Howe, but rather mean that if damages are de-monstrable, the de-posit will be applied against them. How-ever, barring a clear intention to the con-trary, if damages can’t be proven, the deposit will still be forfeited to the seller if the buyer

fails to complete. Following the confusion created

by Agnosti, the decision in Tang has been welcomed by many in the Vancouver Real Estate Bar, and has since been followed by the B.C. Court of Appeal in Amri v. One West Holdings Ltd., 2013 BCCA 155. Indeed, in light of how often we get asked to explain the nature of deposits in real estate transactions, clear insight from the Bench is always welcome.

CARLOS S. MENDES

Carlos S. Mendes is an associate in the Vancouver office of Davis LLP where he practises general corpor-ate commercial and real estate law. His practice includes mergers and acquisitions, commercial leasing, and general commercial, environ-mental, and municipal matters.

Guaranteeing PerformanceCourt reconsiders deposit provisions in real estate contracts

In light of how often we get asked to explain the na-ture of deposits in real estate trans-

actions, clear insight from the Bench is always welcome.

16 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

In 1987, when Premier Bill Vander Zalm introduced the Property Transfer Tax (PTT) in British Columbia, the aver-age home price in Vancouver

was just over $147,000. The PTT was calculated as one percent on the first $200,000 of a home’s sale price and two per cent on the re-mainder. The estimated price of a typical detached home in Greater Vancouver, as of February 2013, is $901,500 (according to the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancou-ver). While B.C. is not the only province or territory across Can-ada that has a tax on property purchases, it is one of the most ex-pensive, and the thresholds have never been adjusted for inflation or the cost of living.

The First Time Home Buyers (FTHB) Program helps to alleviate this tax somewhat for those buyers seeking to enter the housing mar-ket by allowing an exemption for properties valued up to $425,000, with a proportional exemption for eligible residences with a fair market value of up to $25,000 above the threshold (see the B.C. Ministry of Finance website for further information). There are a number of other exemptions, such as between spouses under separa-tion agreements or between family members in certain circumstances.

In 2011-2012, the PTT applied to approximately 93,000 trans-actions, and generated $927 mil-lion in tax revenue (according to

the Canadian Taxpayers Federa-tion). Notably, most of the trans-actions were for single-family homes. In 2012-2013, it is esti-mated that the PTT will bring in just under $800 million. The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancou-ver has suggested that the one per cent PTT threshold be increased from $200,000 to $525,000, or that the PTT be removed al-together. Critics of the PTT argue that it is hurting families in British Columbia by keeping them out of the housing market longer, even with the FTHB exemp-tions, and causes mobility issues if

an individual has to move for work as the PTT can be a prohibitive cost. The PTT must be paid each time a property changes hands in the development process, so that same piece of property gets taxed over and over with each transfer.

The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver provides the following rationale for removing the tax: that it could encourage 1000 potential

buyers who are undecided about purchasing a home to buy a home, which will then generate approxi-mately $6.6 million in provincial taxes, $3 million in federal taxes, $320,000 in municipal taxes and 2,800 jobs. Robert Laing, CEO of the B.C. Real Estate Associa-tion, has said that each Multiple Listing Service (MLS) sale gener-ates nearly $60,000 in expendi-tures, including fees for lawyers, surveyors, appraisers and real es-tate agents, new appliances, fur-niture, renovations and repairs, and more than $9,000 in other

taxes. The question is whether removing the PTT would stimu-late enough real estate sales to cover the rev-enue shortfall, or if the funds would have to come from some-where else. Others have suggested re-placing the PTT with a carbon tax.

It is unlikely that the B.C. gov-ernment will eliminate the tax altogether as it has funneled ap-proximately $12 billion dollars from home buyers to the provin-cial government since its incep-tion, which in turn funds servi-ces such as health care and edu-cation. One thing is for certain, whether or not the PTT stays; tax revenue will have to come from somewhere to fund these services. Where should that be?

KRYSTLE GILL

Property Transfer TaxShould B.C. reduce or eliminate the Property Transfer Tax?

Krystle Gill is an associate lawyer practising family law, civil litiga-tion and personal injury at HART Legal and is the Equality and Diversity Representative on the CBABC Executive Committee and the CBABC Women Lawyers Forum Vancouver Island Chair.

The estimated price of a typical

detached home in Greater Vancouver,

as of February 2013, is $901,500.

features

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 17

Parent with principal residence adds children as joint tenants to title. It sounds so simple; yet of the do-it-yourself es-

tate planning remedies, this is one of the most misunderstood.

The use of joint tenancy to pass a principal residence to children on death is appealing because children can be added as joint tenants with-out property transfer tax and the title passes outside the Will of the parent. With a “true” joint tenancy (where beneficial interests vest in the children at the time of transfer), probate fees (approximately 1.4 per cent) are saved and the Wills Varia-tion Act (the “WVA”) can some-times be avoided. Where children hold title in bare trust for a parent, probate fees, but not the WVA, are avoided provided probate is not otherwise required. However, nei-ther plan saves income tax (and can sometimes increase taxes pay-able). Significant non-tax risks and complications can also arise.

The first challenge with any gratuitous transfer is determin-ing whether the transfer was a gift or whether the recipient receives the property subject to a resulting trust for the original owner. A child added to title claiming bene-ficial ownership has the onus to prove a gift was intended (Pec-ore v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17). Retroactively proving intention regarding these “simple” trans-actions is challenging as they are

typically undocumented beyond the Form A transfer. Disputes over the parent’s intentions are a grow-ing source of litigation.

Even with clear intentions there are issues. The risks and detri-ments of a true joint tenancy are several: (1) at the time of transfer there is a tax disposition and a loss of the principal residence exemption on the portion of the property held by the children; (2) bank-ruptcy of a child gives rise to claims against the property; (3) a child’s spouse could claim an interest in the property on separation; (4) a child must

be involved in any transactions; and (5) children may mortgage or otherwise encumber their in-terests. A power of attorney or

committeeship would still be re-quired to sell or encumber a parent’s interest in the event of incapacity.

Where joint tenancy is subject to a bare trust for the original owner, the income tax problems above do not arise because there is no disposition. However, un-less probate is avoided no probate fees are saved (because beneficial ownership remains in the estate). To avoid probate there can be no asset requiring probate, no need to trigger the WVA limitation per-iod, nor any dispute as to the last Will. Many of the risks of joint

ownership remain, since the bare trust is typically unregistered.

What is a practi-tioner to do when faced with a client seeking to put chil-dren on title? Delve deeper. Often the loss of control, risks and potential nega-tive income tax con-

sequences, make a savings of 1.4 per cent in probate fees seems less attractive. If a joint tenancy is still appealing, then insist on documenting the intention of the original owner. Typically either a deed of gift (where a true gift is intended) or a declaration of trust (in the case of a bare trust) are prepared. More unusually a gift of the right of survivorship is docu-mented (the issues associated with such gifts must be left for another column). In the right circum-stances, joint tenancy between parents and children can be a use-ful tool, but care should always be taken not to do more harm than good with this “simple” step.

GENEVIEVE N. TAYLOR

Genevieve N. Taylor, Legacy Tax + Trust Lawyers.

Dangerously SimplePutting the kids on title

What is a practitioner to do when faced with

a client seeking to put children on title? Delve deeper. Often the loss of control, risks and potential

negative income tax consequences, make a savings of 1.4 per cent in probate fees seems less attractive.

18 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

news&events

Some of the top legal minds in Canada shared their professional wisdom with Eric Hamber law students at the school’s first Law Forum on April 3, 2013. The CBABC invited The Honourable Chief Justice Thomas Crabtree, Provincial Court of B.C., The Honourable Chief Justice Robert Bauman, Supreme Court of B.C and The Honourable Chief Justice Lance Finch, B.C. Court of Appeal

to discuss legal issues with students face-to-face at the forum hosted by CBC anchor Ian Hanomansing.

The three Chief Justices explained to students the “Top Ten, Myths and Misperceptions” regarding the courts and law, and explored sensi-tive issues, including perceived pol-itical and personal bias of justices.

\\ Watch the video at: www.cba.org/lawweek/events/main/student_forum.aspx

NEWS

Three Chief Justices Share Their Collective Wisdom at a Student Law Forum During Law Week

Signifying an important win for the independence of the Bar, the B.C. Court of Appeal recently upheld the decision in Federation of Law Societies of Canada (FLSC) v. Can-ada (Attorney General) that includes lawyers in Canada’s Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and related regulations is unconstitutional.

The CBA intervened, argu-ing that the law violates ss. 7 and 8 of the Charter by interfering with the solicitor-client relationship, and that requiring lawyers to record in-formation about their clients, which would be available to the state, threatens a lawyer’s duty to their clients.

The court agreed with the CBA’s position, and stated that the independence of the Bar is a principle of funda-mental justice. The CBA has defended solicitor-client privilege and the independ-ence of the Bar since the first Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) Act was tabled in Parliament in 1999.

Ron Skolrood of Vancou-ver’s Lawson Lundell LLP has served as the CBA’s pro bono counsel since 2001.

CBA NATIONAL NEWS

B.C. Court of Appeal Decision Upholds Lawyers’ Duty to Clients

Student Law Forum hosted by CBC anchor Ian Hanomansing.

B.C. Arbitration and Mediation Institute (BCAMI) invites participants to explore challenging and topical arbitration and mediation issues through presentations from experts in the field on June 10, 2013. The exchange of ideas and information between participants will be encouraged. This symposium qualifies for CPD credits.

\\ More info at: www.bcami.com

UPCOMING EVENT

BCAMI Arbitration and Mediation Symposium

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 19

CBA NATIONAL NEWS

CCCA & Rotman School of Management Partner to Create In-House Certification Program

CBA LEGAL CONFERENCE

learn, connect,

experience.

CCCAACCJE

Aug. 18-20, 2013 | Saskatoon

www.cba.org/CLC

CBA NATIONAL NEWS

CBA Legal Conference, Saskatoon August 18-20, 2013Attend the CLC in Saskatoon from August 18 to 20 to connect with more than 1,000 legal profession-als; learn in participant-driven, interactive, accredited PD sessions; and experience three days of skills development, influential speakers, and networking with colleagues.

This year’s opening plenary features a face known to all Canadians: Peter Mansbridge, CBC

chief correspondent & anchor of the National. Drawing on the countless world leaders he’s interviewed, Peter will speak to #CLC2013 delegates on how to be an effective leader – whether in business, politics or academia.

\\ To learn more and register now, visit: www.cba.org/clc

CBA NATIONAL NEWS

CBA’s Legal Futures Initiative Aims to Lay Foundation for New Way to Practice Law

With its Legal Futures Initiative, launched last year, the CBA hopes to lay the foundation for a new way to practice law.

That may sound ambitious, but a multitude of articles, blog posts, tweets and papers from around the world have warned that change is coming. It’s inevitable.

The legal profession must either get out in front of it and set the direction, or succumb to the inertia.

Phase I of the Futures project involved commissioning original research to establish where the profession currently stands, and identifying the primary drivers of change – the economy, global-ization, and technology, for starters.

On the Futures website, the CBA is sharing all the details of its research with you, which will culminate in the June 10 release of the one paper that draws all the findings together. With its release, the CBA will launch Phase II, where they want to hear from their 37,000+ members, as well as other members of the profession about what you see coming, what changes you’ve made, where you want to be in the next decade and beyond, and how the CBA may be able to help.

In the meantime, CBA invites you to keep an eye – and your Twitter fingers – on the discussion at #CBAfutures.

\\ Visit the Futures website to learn more: www.cba.org/cba/fol/home/

The CCCA and the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Manage-ment have partnered to create the Busi-ness Leadership Program for In-House Counsel, which will provide graduates with the designation of Certified In-House Counsel – Canada (CIC.C). “The program fulfills the learning and competency needs required by in-house counsel who are ultimately looking to become a general counsel or mem-ber of an executive team,” explained CCCA Chair Grant Borbridge, QC. “This program provides an enormous advantage to CCCA members, giving them a competitive edge over their peers. Essentially, graduates of the Certified In-House Counsel – Canada program will have proven that they can use their legal skills and business knowledge to solve complex and ever-changing organizational challenges.”

The announcement was made on April 15 at the CCCA’s National Spring Conference in Toronto.

\\ To learn more about the program, visit: www.ccca-accje.org

20 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

news&events

CLEBC IS PROUD TO PUBLISH RESOURCES TO SUPPORT MOST B.C. REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS: Land Title Practice Manual: Three volumes of essential reference material for land title division staff and conveyancing professionals. Land Title Electronic Forms Guidebook (the Green Book): Sets out requirements of the

Land Title and Survey Au-thority for electronic land

title forms in a consolidated form in this handy publication.B.C. Real Estate Practice Manual: This practical, day-to-day guide leads you quickly and completely through a conveyance. B.C. Strata Property Practice Manual: With a high level of new strata projects in B.C., and with an active litigation environ-ment, this practice manual is an excellent tool for both solicitors and litigators. B.C. Mortgages Practice Manual: This essential reference reviews the residential mortgage and discusses special considerations for commercial mortgages.

B.C. Real Estate Development Practice Manual: Gives you a strong command of the legal prin-ciples and an understanding of the real estate development process.

And for legal support staff, the Conveyancing Deskbook is a practical step-by-step guide to the transfer of land in British Columbia.

All these publications are avail-able in both print and online. For more information, visit the CLEBC website at www.cle.bc.ca.

NEWS

CLEBC Update

Be a part of the Lawyer Referral Service and gain access to a number of potential clients. The CBABC promotes this public service to residents throughout the province resulting in more than 35,000 referrals a year. The Lawyer Referral Service is open to all practising lawyers in the province. Call 604-687-3404 (within the Lower Mainland) or 1-800-663-1919 (outside the Lower Mainland) or email lawyerreferral@bccba.org.

Top five areas of law LRS refers lawyers to:�� Family�� Torts�� Employment�� Wills, Estates & Trusts�� Criminal

SERVICE

Lawyer Referral Service (LRS)

This is the Conference everyone has been waiting for! Registration has already begun, so register today, because our Conference always sells out early. Here is a sneak preview of the line-up so far: The Honourable Chief Justice Robert J. Bauman, The Honourable Chief Judge Thomas Crabtree, The Honourable Chief Justice Pierre Blais, Marcella McLaughlin, President San Diego County Bar Association, and Chris Lindberg, Deputy Attorney of San Diego.

Speaker panels (nine sessions and four breakouts) will include a wide range of local experts, judges, USA lawyers. Great oppor-tunity to gain your full 12 hours of mandatory PD in three days of networking and learning in the sun. REGISTER TODAY! Early Bird Deadline is July 31, 2013 – Sign Up and Save. For more info uuu www.cbabc-conference.org

UPCOMING EVENT

2013 CBABC Annual Branch Conference San Diego, California Nov. 15-17, 2013

2013SAN DIEGO

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 21

MAY 31 LAP – “Refirement” – Vancouver Workshop

JUNE 6 CBABC PD Webinar/In-Person: The Extradition Act (Canada) and your Client: Letting Bygones Be “Be-Gones”

6 CBABC PD/Victoria Bar Assoc. Joint Seminar: Being External Counsel to Government and Corporate Counsel

6 Chief Justice Lance Finch Retirement Dinner

7 Twelfth Annual Battle of the Bar Bands – Vancouver

10 CBABC PD Webinar/In-Person: The Cohen Commission and the Uncertain Future of Fraser River Sockeye Salmon: Implications Going Forward for Lawyers

10 BCAMI Arbitration & Mediation Symposium

11 CBABC PD/North Shore Bar Assoc. Joint Seminar: Employment Tips for Lawyers as Employers

13 CBABC PD Webinar Repeat (with live Q & A): Best Practices in Managing Criminal Trials

13 CBABC PD/Sections Joint Seminar: Creating a More Just Society: The Role of Human Rights Advocates in a Global Village

14 CBABC PD In-person Seminar: Gain a Competitive Advantage Beyond “Customer Service”

21 Lawyers’ Assistance Program: Gratitude Lunch

22 Provincial Council

JULY 4 The 2013 New West- minster/Fraser Valley Bars Golf Tournament

18 Young Lawyers – Victoria 3rd Annual Golf Tournament

BRANCH & BAR

CalendarCurrent from February 27 to April 16, 2013 Legislative Update is provided as part of the CBABC legislative and law reform program. It is a service funded by CBA membership fees, and is, therefore, provided as a benefit of CBA membership. The full version of Legislative Update is now only published online and available to CBA members exclu-sively at www.cba.org/bc.

�� ADULT GUARDIANSHIP AND PLANNING STATUTES AMEND-MENT ACT, 2007, S.B.C. 2007, C. 34 (BILL 29) Section 110(b) and (c) is in force February 28, 2013. Sections 1(c), (k) as it enacts the definitions of “health authority designate,” “health care provider,” “qualified health care provider” and “statu-tory property guardian” in section 1 of the Adult Guardianship Act, section 4 as it enacts the heading to Part 2.1, sections 19(1)(e), 32(1) to (4) and (7), 33(2)(b) and (3), 34, 35 and 37(3) and (4) of the Adult Guardianship Act and sec-tion 17 as it repeals sections 62 and 63 of the Adult Guardianship Act and enacts sections 62, 62.1, 62.3 and 63(2)(a) to (f), (p) and (s) of the Adult Guardianship Act are in force June 30, 2014

�� ATHLETIC COMMISSIONER ACT, S.B.C. 2012, C. 29 (BILL 50) Act is in force May 30, 2013

�� CIVIL RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL ACT, S.B.C. 2012, C. 25 (BILL 44) Section 71 is in force March 15, 2013

�� DESTINATION BC CORP. ACT, S.B.C. 2013, C. 6 (BILL 3) Act, except sections 36 and 37, is in force March 19, 2013

�� EMERGENCY AND HEALTH SERVICES AMENDMENT ACT, 2013, S.B.C. 2013, C. 13 (BILL 7) Sections 1 to 30 are in force April 1, 2013

For a complete list of Acts in Force go to: www.cba.org/bc

B.C. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

ACTS IN FORCE

Congratulations go out to Andrea S. Donohoe for correctly answering all of the “New Ways of Doing Legal Research BarTalk Quiz“ questions. She is the winner of the $50 iTunes gift card.

WINNER

Congratulations Andrea S. Donohoe

22 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

news&events

PRACTICE TIP FOR THE CIVIL

LITIGATOR IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT:

Counsel of Record Practice tip: To become counsel of record, a lawyer must notify the court registry in writing and then serve it on the oppos-ing parties in addition to any statement made to the court during a hearing. Failure to do so could result in a default order being made against your client because either the court or the parties did not know how to notify you of a hearing. In Prov-incial Court, a change in counsel constitutes a change in address. The form to use: Notice of Change of Address form found at: www.ag.gov.bc.ca/courts/forms/scl/scl831.pdfThe rule to follow: “A party must promptly notify, in writing, the registrar and all other par-ties of any change in the party’s address.” Rule 18(16) of the Small Claims Rules

Ministry of Justice, Court Services Branch

TWITTER FOR LAWYERS AND GROWN UPS The Law Society of B.C., Stats Can, PM Harper, Davis LLP, every major reporter and 140 million others are on Twitter. Are you? If you think that Twitter is for teenagers, let us suggest three ways that lawyers can use Twitter in a grown up way. KEEP UP TO DATEWhether it’s the Boston Marathon bombing or political events, news breaks on Twitter first. Legal news is no different. From judicial appointments to the latest SCC decisions, Twitter helps you find it both first and efficiently. The beauty of Twitter’s 140 character limit is that it is all headlines, allowing you to scan quickly. Twitter lists, like CLBC’s @theCLBC, can get you started. HAVE A CONVERSATIONTwitter can connect you to experts and people in your field in ways like no other networking. Whether you’re at the same confer-ence or you’re interested in the same decision, using a #hashtag connects you to people who are having the same conversation. COLLECT EVIDENCETwitter is a storehouse of evidence about people’s activities, locations and conversations. Automate your searches and the evidence is compiled for you.

\\ Interested in more? Check out CLBC’s expanded post at: www.courthouselibrary.ca

LAW WEEK 2013FORT ST. JOHN – April 27, 2013

The centrepiece of the Fort St. John Law Day was the mock trial of Hansel and Gretel before a judge and jury (composed of 12 children from the public) on charges of committing willful damage to the Gingerbread Witch’s Cottage. The above photo is the cast of the mock trial.

TIPS FROM

LAW WEEK 2013VANCOUVER

5 km Fun Run/Walk – April 8, 2013

2013 Barry Sullivan Law Cup WinnersOpen House – April 16, 2013

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 23

LAW FOUNDATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIALAW FOUNDATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

grantsapproved

The Board of Governors of the Law Foundation of B.C. met on March 23, 2013 and approved funding for a number of continuing programs and projects.

Funding totalling $5,494,810 was approved for the following 30 continuing programs: $575,000WEST COAST ENVIRON-MENTAL LAW ASSOCIATIONPrograms and EDRF

$535,480B.C. PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRESocial and Regulatory Justice Programs

COMMUNITY LEGAL ASSISTANCE SOCIETY$411,000 Community Law Program $395,500 Poverty Law Services $140,000 Community Advocate Support Line

$365,000ACCESS PRO BONO SOCIETY OF B.C.Major Programs

$359,800UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIALaw Centre Clinical Program

$297,490TENANT RESOURCE AND ADVISORY CENTRE SOCIETYTenants’ Legal Advocacy Program

$288,640PEOPLE’S LAW SCHOOL SOCIETYMajor Programs

$280,600B.C. LAW INSTITUTEOperating Grant

$200,000MEDIATE BC SOCIETYMajor Programs

$179,650WEST COAST DOMESTIC WORKERS’ ASSOCIATIONLegal Advocacy Program

$167,550WEST COAST LEAF ASSOCIATIONLitigation and Law Reform Program

JUSTICE EDUCATION SOCIETY OF B.C.$150,000 Major Programs $76,000 Northern Native Public Legal Education Program for Aboriginal Communities

$112,500B.C. CENTRE FOR ELDER ADVOCACY AND SUPPORTLegal Advocacy Program

$110,000POVNET SOCIETYPovNet Program

$75,000ATIRA WOMEN’S RESOURCE SOCIETYLegal Advocacy Program

$75,000BATTERED WOMEN’S SUPPORT SERVICESLegal Advocacy Program

$75,000DZE L K’ANT FRIENDSHIP CENTRE SOCIETYLegal Advocacy Program

$75,000MAPLE RIDGE/PITT MEAD-OWS COMMUNITY SERVICESPoverty Law Advocacy Program

$75,000NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY RESOURCES SOCIETYNorth Shore Legal Advocacy Program

$75,000SHARE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICESPoverty Law Advocacy Program

$75,000SOURCES COMMUNITY RESOURCES SOCIETYPoverty Law Advocacy Program

$75,000TERRACE AND DISTRICT COMMUNITY SERVICES SOCIETYPoverty Law Advocate Program

$70,000QUESNEL TILLICUM SOCIETYLegal Advocacy Program

$60,000PUBLIC INTEREST ARTICLING FELLOWSHIPCommunity Legal Assistance Society

$55,000UPPER SKEENA COUNSELLING & LEGAL ASSISTANCE SOCIETYAdvocacy Program

$45,000LAW FOUNDATION GRADUATE FELLOWSHIPSMegan Kammerer Paige Morrow Robyn Trask

$20,600UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWANNative Law Centre

Funding totalling $60,000 was approved for the fol-lowing five small projects: $15,000THE POVERTY AND HUMAN RIGHTS CENTREB.C. Human Rights Law Project

$14,000B.C. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND PRIVACY ASSOCIATIONIntroducing FOI and ATI for Academics

$12,000ATIRA WOMEN’S RESOURCE SOCIETYAboriginal Women’s Toolkit – A Guide To Your Rights on Reserve

$10,000BRITANNIA COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTRE SOCIETYUnderage Youth Access to Legal Information

$9,000KELOWNA COMMUNITY RESOURCESLegal Consultation Presen-tations for Immigrants

Funding totalling $629,200 was approved for the fol-lowing seven grants: $300,000B.C. CENTRE FOR ELDER ADVOCACY AND SUPPORTElder Law Clinic

$75,000VANCOUVER ISLAND NORTH WOMEN’S RESOURCE SOCIETYAdvocacy Services Centre Program

$75,000VERNON WOMEN’S TRAN-SITION HOUSE SOCIETYNorth Okanagan Legal Advocacy Program

$75,000WATARI RESEARCH ASSOCIATIONSystems Negotiator Program

$43,200ACCESS PRO BONO SOCIETY OF B.C.Increased Client Intake & Summary Advice Program Services

$36,000WACHIAY FRIENDSHIP CENTREWachiay Advocacy Outreach Program

$25,000MEDIATE BC SOCIETYTransition Grant

\\ For full details of the programs and projects that received funding, please visit www.lawfoundationbc.org.

24 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

\\ WEBSITE: CBAPD.ORG EMAIL: PD@BCCBA.ORG

professionaldevelopment

NEW in Professional Development! E-learning On Demand\\ Our online courses incorporate reading materials, quizzes, audio and video \\ Available 24/7 \ Requires Internet connection

CBABC Professional Development is pleased to introduce our first e-learning on demand courses. Earn your CPD credits easily and conveniently, at the time that suits you best.

Course Title: Introduction to Ethics and Professional Responsibility in British Columbia \\ Module 1 : Canons of Legal Ethics, Clients and Marketing (1 CPD hour)\\ Module 2: Administration of Justice, Supervision, The Profession (1 CPD hour)

To register, contact Professional Development: Email: pd@bccba.org Tel: 604-687-3404 ext. 329

CBABC Professional Development courses are designed to meet the needs of lawyers while still maintaining the opportunity to network and advance one’s career, practice and business. We pride ourselves in bringing courses to lawyers that will provide the required professional responsibility and ethics, client care and relations, and practice management component for 2013 Law Society of British Columbia reporting.

Upcoming In-person Seminars

IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE NORTH SHORE BAR ASSOCIATIONEmployment Tips for Lawyers as Employers Date: June 11, 2013 Speaker: Dean A. Crawford, Heenan Blaikie LLP Location: John Braithwaite Com-munity Centre, North Vancouver

IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE-VANCOUVER SECTIONDebunking Crime Control: Myths and Misconceptions Date: June 12, 2013 Speaker: Brian H. Greenspan, Greenspan Humphrey Lavine Location: The Law Courts Inn, 4th Floor, 800 Smithe Street, Vancouver

CBABC PRESENTSCreating a More Just Society: The Role of Human Rights Advocates in a Global Village Date: June 13, 2013 Keynote Speaker: Rajvinder

Singh Bains, Human Rights Advocate and Lawyer, Committee Member for the Coordination on the Disappearances in Punjab (CCDP) and the People’s Com-mission on Human Rights Violation in Punjab Location: The Law Courts Inn, 4th Floor, 800 Smithe Street, Vancouver

Gain a Competitive Advantage Beyond “Customer Service” Date: June 14, 2013 Speaker: Dennis Hilton – Facilitator, Trainer, Consultant and Speaker Location: The Law Courts Inn, 4th Floor, 800 Smithe Street, Vancouver

Upcoming Webinars

The Extradition Act (Canada) and your Client: Letting By-gones Be “Be-Gones” Date: June 6, 2013 Speakers: Eric V. Gottardi, Peck and Company and Greg P. DelBigio, QC Moderator: Stuart Rennie, Legislation and Law Reform Officer, CBABC

The Cohen Commission and the Uncertain Future of Fraser River Sockeye Salmon: Implications Going Forward for Lawyers Date: June 10, 2013 Speakers: Brenda E. Gaertner, Man-dell Pinder LLP and Hugh A. Mac-aulay, Department of Justice, Invited Moderator: Stuart Rennie, Legislation and Law Reform Officer, CBABC

Best Practices in Managing Criminal Trials (Webinar Repeat with Live Q & A) Date: June 13, 2013 Updates/Q & A Session Host: Stuart Rennie, Legislation and Law Reform Officer, CBABC

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 25

EMAIL: ADS@BCCBA.ORG

displayads

WCB & CPP DISABILITY APPEALS

254 - 12899 76th Ave. Surrey, BC V3W 1E6

GC GOSAL & COMPANYBARRISTERS & SOLICITORS

GC

Sarj GosalB.A., LL.B.

www.gosalandcompany.com

604.591.8187info@gosalandcompany.com

l

390 Howard Ave.Burnaby, B.C.V5B 3P8Canada

Preferred Supplier of:

O N P O I N TL E G A L R E S E A R C H

www.onpointlaw.com 604.879.4280 info@onpointlaw.com

L E G A L M E M O R A N D A

FA C TACPD RESEARCH VIDEOS Lawyers helping lawyers for over 12 years.

Sometimes, your next move is obvious.

O N P O1 1 3 1 1

I N T1 1

op

BarTalk_ad_1/3-page_2013.05.01.indd 1 13-05-01 4:39 PM

26 BARTALK / JUNE 2013

barmovesSPACE IS AT A PREMIUM AND AVAILABLE ON A FIRST-COME

FIRST-SERVED BASIS SO SEND YOUR BAR MOVE (MAX. 30 WORDS) AND PHOTO TO CBA@BCCBA.ORG NOW.

Tammy Huculak has joined Brawn Karras Sanderson as associate counsel in South Surrey. Her practice continues to include real es-tate development, commercial leasing, franchising, general corporate law and her trademark practice.

Scott Sweatmanjoins the Vancouver office of Dentons Canada LLP as a partner in the Pensions & Benefits and Employment & Labour groups. Prior to joining Dentons, Scott was a partner at Spectrum Law.

Sergio Custodiois now a partner at Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP. Sergio advises clients on a broad range of business and commer-cial matters, with a focus on real estate, infrastructure and transportation.

Johanna Fipke is now a partner in Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP’s Global Mining group. Johanna practises in the areas of cor-porate and commercial law, mergers and acquisitions, land tenures, and project development and permitting.

KC Miuis now a partner at Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP. KC practises corpor-ate/commercial law with a focus on financial services – acting for clients in debt financing, secured transactions, due diligence and regulatory matters.

Britt Redenbachhas joined Miller Thomson LLP’s Vancouver office as partner focusing on the firm’s Capital Markets and Securities group.

Rina Jaswalhas joined Miller Thomson LLP’s Vancouver office as partner focusing on the firm’s Capital Markets & Secur-ities group. She advises both public and private companies on a variety of matters.

Cherisse Friesenhas joined Miller Thomson LLP’s Vancouver office as partner focusing on commercial litigation, securities litigation and insurance litigation.

Nafisa Tejani joins Forrester & Company, Barristers as an associate focusing on com-mercial litigation with an emphasis on contractual disputes, real property claims, and debtor-creditor remedies.

Colin Galinskijoins the Vancouver office of Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP as an associate in the firm’s Pensions & Benefits and Labour & Employment groups. Colin previously practised at Spectrum Law.

Who’s Moving Where and When

newmembers

Regular Member

Dimitra BizosBizos & Company Vancouver

Steven CataniaFasken Martineau Vancouver

Carmen Elizabeth Gustafson Cabott & Cabott, Barristers Whitehorse

Richard D. PesklevitsRichard D. Pesklevits Law Surrey

Christiaan J. RothmanChristiaan J. Rothman Law Corporation Vernon

Jai Singh SheikhupuraHeenan Blaikie LLP Vancouver

Articling Students

Peter BizosQuay Law Centre Vancouver

Laura Weston-Baradoy McConnan Bion O’Connor & Peterson Law Corporation Victoria

Law Students

Sabrina B. AddeoHalifaxNicole D. BayzaeCoquitlamCarlie Cromlish VictoriaJacobus Dejager VictoriaChristina Debra GrayVancouverSean D. Hedley VancouverAndrea H. LindsayVancouverGraham D. MackQuesnelFarah T. MalikVancouverBrad McFaddenBurnabyAdam-Joshua B. Noel-Steeves VancouverPatrick G. ReedVictoriaKiranjeet SandhuPrince RupertKenneth D. SmithVancouverEdith SzilagyiCoquitlamXi XuNorth Vancouver

March & April 2013

SPACE IS AT A PREMIUM AND AVAILABLE ON A FIRST-COME FIRST-SERVED BASIS SO SEND YOUR BAR MOVE (MAX. 30

WORDS) AND PHOTO TO CBA@BCCBA.ORG NOW.

FOR MORE BAR MOVES GO TO BARTALK ONLINE

Robin Dhir has joined Fasken Martineau’s Vancouver office as Strategic Advisor. A seasoned executive, Robin will work with the firm’s lawyers to develop and enhance busi-ness relationships across various industries and communities.

Forrest C. Hume top transportation lawyer, joins Davis LLP as a partner. Forrest has more than 34 years of experience in transportation law with a niche specialty emphasis on railway matters.

Brian Vick joins Edwards, Kenny & Bray LLP (EKB) in EKB’s Business and Securities Law practice groups. Prior to joining EKB, Brian practised at McCarthy Tetrault LLP.

Ian Moes has joined Kuhn LLP’s partnership. He practices in corporate/commercial and construction law.

Steve Saville is now a partner at Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP. Steve advises clients on corporate and general matters as well as domestic and cross-border public and private securities offerings and mergers and acquisitions.

JUNE 2013 / BARTALK 27

CBA (BC) Benevolent Society

Providing assistance to lawyers and articled students who have

suffered an illness or injury.

\\ www.cba.org/bc/Initiatives/main/ benevolent_society.aspx

For more information go online:

PUB: Bar Talk

DATE: June

File: 13-MER-0167_EClass_Bar_Talk_MAY Date: May 3 2013 Proof:

1Trim: 8.25" x 10.75" File Created:

Docket: 13-MER-0124 Job: Newspaper

Client: Mercedes Operator: RHODDY

Colour: 4C

PR: AD: CD: CW: AE: OP: RM

Suite 730 - 1201 W Pender Street • Vancouver, BC, Canada V6E 2V2 • Tel: 604.639.2266 • Fax: 604.639.2447

A D

aim

ler B

rand

©2013 Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc.

Open the door and take a seat. Look around the meticulously crafted cabin; you’re about to embark on a new adventure. Engineering marvels like Active Blind Spot Assist assure you a safe journey. Available award-winning 4MATICTM permanent all-wheel drive encourages you to take the road less travelled. This is a different class of automobile. This is the 2013 E-Class.

The perfect ‘E’. For all you A-types.The 2013 E 300 4MATIC™ Sedan.

Visit your Mercedes-Benz dealer or mbvancouver.ca to schedule a test drive.

For more information on Corporate Sales for your organization

call (604) 351-5290 or email: randall.desbrisay@mercedes-benz.ca

Mercedes-Benz Vancouver Area Retail Group

Mercedes-Benz Vancouver #62761395 W. Broadway, Vancouver(604) 736-7411

Mercedes-Benz Boundary #62781325 Boundary Road, Vancouver(604) 639-3300

Mercedes-Benz North Shore #62771375 Marine Drive, North Vancouver(604) 984-9351

Mercedes-Benz Richmond #62795691 Parkwood Way, Richmond(604) 278-7662

Mercedes-Benz Surrey #1101315508-104 Ave., Surrey(604) 581-7662