basic assessment report · 2018. 8. 5. · basic assessment report 1 (for official use only) file...

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

1

(For official use only)File Reference Number:Application Number:Date Received:

Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010, promulgated interms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended.

Kindly note that:

1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIARegulations, 2010 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particularcompetent authority for the activity that is being applied for.

2. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarilyindicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as eachspace is filled with typing.

3. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable in the report.

4. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision.

5. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of materialinformation that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of theapplication as provided for in the regulations.

6. This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority.

7. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted.

8. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner.

9. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competentauthority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request,during any stage of the application process.

10. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this reportneed to be completed.


2

SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION

Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of thissection?

YESx

NO

If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest”

for appointment of a specialist for each specialist thus appointed:Any specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D.

1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION

Describe the activity, which is being applied for, in detail1:

Eskom Transmission intends to upgrade the existing servitude around the Simmerpan area on farm

Rosherville 280 JR and Elandsfontein IR Germiston which falls under the jurisdiction of the Ekurhuleni

Metropolitan Municipality.

The transact of the proposed power line is situated in the Germiston/Johannesburg area. The proposed

route follows the following 8 Sections:

1. At Simmerpan Substation extension of the substation is planned on a highly disturbed stand

with transformed grassland dominated by weeds. The site is located directly opposite the

Victoria Lake hotel.

2. The proposed upgrade runs from this substation westwards along Power Street through highly

developed industrial area with the golf course on the south.

3. The line crosses Power Street to Gosworth Road, still north of the golf course.

4. Then the line continues westwards north of the old Gosworth Park Race Course, now being

developed as an industrial development, to the Jack Shaft Substation, situated directly north of

the Gosworth Park development.

5. The line continues westwards over highly transformed old mining area towards the N3

Highway.

6. Here the line will cross a wetland and the N3 highway.

7. After the N3 the line runs between a mine dump and an industrial area to the Jupiter

Substation.

8. From Jupiter Substation the line continues to the site of the newly proposed substation (Two

alternative sites, situated north and south of the M33 Road.

The entire area of the proposed line is a flat plain, most of the area with in highly developed industrial

and or mining areas, the mines in the area are closed with old mine dumps and only severely disturbed

areas remaining. Signs of wetland in the western parts and remains of mining disturbances with no

conservation value; however one wetland at the far western endpoint of the proposed line is still

functional.

The proposed Simmerpan Strengthening will consist of the construction of the following structures and

1 Please note that this description should not be a verbatim repetition of the listed activity as contained in the relevantGovernment Notice, but should be a brief description of activities to be undertaken as per the project description.


3

infrastructure:

2x400kV approximately 1km line between Jupiter and New Jupiter B MTS; 132kV line between Jupiter MTS, Jack Shaft S/S and New Simmerpan MTS; Operate Jupiter – Simmerpan 1&2 88kV line at 275kV and connect 1st and 2nd 275/132kV

250MVA transformers at Simmerpan MTS; Widen the existing Jupiter-Simmerpan 1&2 275kV 6km servitude to 400kV servitude; and Expansion of the Simmerpan MTS

The extension of the Simmerpan MTS will entail construction of the following

132kV bus coupler 2x132kV busbars 4x400kV line bays 2x400kV line turn ins 2x400kV busbars 2x400kV bus sections 4x250MVA 400/132kV transformer 400kV bus coupler Common yard & buildings Cable to Jackshaft

Two locality alternatives (sites) were considered and assessed for the proposed extension of theSimmerpan MTS. These include the grass patch opposite the Victoria Lake i.e. site A or alternatively thearea that is currently used as a parking bay i.e Site B.

2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES

“alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the generalpurpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to—(a) the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity;(b) the type of activity to be undertaken;(c) the design or layout of the activity;(d) the technology to be used in the activity;(e) the operational aspects of the activity; and(f) the option of not implementing the activity.

Describe alternatives that are considered in this application. Alternatives should include a consideration of allpossible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity could be accomplished in the specificinstance taking account of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative must in all cases beincluded in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the other alternatives areassessed. The determination of whether site or activity (including different processes etc.) or both is appropriateneeds to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt of this reportthe competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possiblyaccomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not beenconsidered to a reasonable extent.Paragraphs 3 – 13 below should be completed for each alternative.


4

Another key driver towards a successful EIA is the identification and investigation of feasible alternatives. Theselection of potential alternatives was informed by input received from the specialist as well as the EAP.Alternatives were considered and discussed in terms of their practicality and feasibility. It is important to note thatthe definition of alternatives includes all aspects of the proposed activity including, activity alternatives, processalternatives, scheduling alternatives, demand alternatives; design alternatives and the No-go alternative. Hencethe proposed project has considered and assessed in terms of both environmental acceptability as well aseconomical feasibility further throughout the project. No alternatives will be available in this proposed project as itentails the upgrading of powerlines in Simmerpan, it is envisaged that, there will be location alternatives for theproposed new Simmerpan MTS.

The locality map in Appendix A depicts the different alternatives that were considered for the expansion of theSimmerpan MTS, wherein Site A is the preferred alternative due to its positionining in relation to the existingSimmerpan substation as well as its size.. During the detailed analysis of the site C,D and E were eliminated,therefore site A and B are the only alternatives that this study will look into including the no go alternative.

Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative)

The proposed Simmerpan Strengthening will consist of the construction of the following structures and infrastructure:

2x400kV approximately 1km line between Jupiter and New Jupiter B MTS; 132kV line between Jupiter MTS, Jack Shaft S/S and New Simmerpan MTS; Operate Jupiter – Simmerpan 1&2 88kV line at 275kV and connect 1st and 2nd 275/132kV 250MVA transformers

at Simmerpan MTS; Widen the existing Jupiter-Simmerpan 1&2 275kV 6km servitude to 400kV servitude; and Expansion of the Simmmerpan MTS on site A which is the grass patch opposite the Victoria Lake. (The

exact locality of the proposed site for expansion in relation to the existing substation is depicted on the locality andsensitivity maps attached as Appendix A).

Site A is the preferred site as it is in the sight of the lines as the two main powerlines and the third leg to be constructed willgo right into the newly expanded substation to be constructed. It is 800 x 600m footprints from the road to the base of themine dumps and it gives a 32m buffer zone before the sprint.

The site is big enough to accommodate the proposed expansion and it furthermore offers the best alignment into thesubstation, which makes it technically viable.

Alternative 2

The proposed Simmerpan Strengthening will consist of the construction of the following structures and infrastructure:

2x400kV approximately 1km line between Jupiter and New Jupiter B MTS; 132kV line between Jupiter MTS, Jack Shaft S/S and New Simmerpan MTS; Operate Jupiter – Simmerpan 1&2 88kV line at 275kV and connect 1st and 2nd 275/132kV 250MVA transformers

at Simmerpan MTS; Widen the existing Jupiter-Simmerpan 1&2 275kV 6km servitude to 400kV servitude; and Expansion of the Simmerpan MTS on site B which is the parking bay. (The exact locality of the proposed site

for expansion in relation to the existing substation is depicted on the locality and sensitivity maps attached asAppendix A).

Site B is less preferred as the power lines will have to bend in order for them to go into the new substation. The size of thesite is also relatively smaller as compared to one of site A. The proposed site for the expansion is 400x300m.

No go Option


5

According to the Regulations of 5 September 1997, consideration must be given to the option not to act. This option isusually considered when the proposed development is envisaged to have such significant negative environmental impactsthat mitigation measures cannot ameliorate the identified impacts effectively.

The no-go option alternative would be the option of not undertaking the construction of the proposed SimmerpanStrengthening (Jupiter-Simmerpan- Jupiter B- Jack Shaft 400&132kV Powerlines and Simmerpan MTS) as planned. Thisoption is not preferred by Eskom for the following reasons: It will imply no improvement in reliability of electricity systems which would benefit electricity users in the municipality,

the region and country at large

Should it be adopted the municipality and community will be deprived of a much needed essential service/facility,

particularly given the already existing problem with energy supply in the country.

Should the desired 7km route prove to be of a sensitive nature (whether socio-economic or biophysical), the perimeter willbe shifted to occupy a less susceptible portion of land within the same farm boundaries. Eskom has identified the area inquestion as the most suitable for the proposed electrical network. Considering the latter, selection of alternatives outside theGermiston area as well as alternatives that deviates from the existing route would defeat the main purpose of the proposedproject as it is an upgrade. Based on investigations, the no-go option alternative can be justifiably dismissed as analternative.

3. ACTIVITY POSITION

Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site foreach alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes shouldhave at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in allcases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection.List alternative sites, if applicable.

Alternative:Latitude (S): Longitude (E):

Alternative S12 (preferred or only sitealternative)

o ‘ o ‘

Alternative S2 (if any) o ‘ o ‘Alternative S3 (if any) o ‘ o ‘In the case of linear activities:Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E):Alternative S1 (preferred or only routealternative)

Starting point of the activity 26o 1332.20” 28o 916.86”

Middle/Additional point of the activity 26o 13’45.33” 28o 0820.41

End point of the activity 26o 13’46,10 28o 06’50,95

Alternative S2 (if any)

Starting point of the activity 26o 1162.20” 28o 856.86”

Middle/Additional point of the activity 26o 13’45.33” 28o 0820.41

End point of the activity 26o 13’46,10 28o 06’50,95

Alternative S3 (if any)

Starting point of the activity o ‘ o ‘

Middle/Additional point of the activity o ‘ o ‘

2 “Alternative S..”refer to site alternatives.


6

End point of the activity o ‘ o ‘

For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with co-ordinates takenevery 250 meters along the route for each alternative alignment.

4. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY

Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternativeactivities/technologies (footprints):Alternative: Size of the activity:Alternative A13 (preferred activity alternative) 480385m2

Alternative A2 (if any) 120385m2

Alternative A3 (if any) m2

or, for linear activities:

Alternative:

Length of theactivity:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) 7000mAlternative A2 (if any) 7000mAlternative A3 (if any) m

Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints will occur):

Alternative:Size of thesite/servitude:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) 480385m2

Alternative A2 (if any) 120385m2

Alternative A3 (if any) m2

5. SITE ACCESS

Does ready access to the site exist? YES

✔NO

If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built Undetermined

Describe the type of access road planned:

There are access roads to the proposed site. Power street is the main street which will be utilised to getto Jupiter Substation and also Jupiter B Substation, where the golf course will be on the left going to theRaceway Industries. The access road to Jack Shaft Substation is M46 on the Rand airport Road. To theproposed Simmerpan Substation is M31 Heidelberg Road which is right to Johannesburg and M33Lower Germiston Road

Include the position of the access road on the site plan and required map, as well as an indication of theroad in relation to the site.

6. SITE OR ROUTE PLAN

3 “Alternative A..”refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives.


7

A detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. It mustbe attached as Appendix A to this document.

The site or route plans must indicate the following:6.1 the scale of the plan which must be at least a scale of 1:500;6.2 the property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50 metres of the site;6.3 the current land use as well as the land use zoning of each of the properties adjoining the site or sites;6.4 the exact position of each element of the application as well as any other structures on the site;6.5 the position of services, including electricity supply cables (indicate above or underground), water supply

pipelines, boreholes, street lights, sewage pipelines, storm water infrastructure and telecommunicationinfrastructure;

6.6 all trees and shrubs taller than 1.8 metres;6.7 walls and fencing including details of the height and construction material;6.8 servitudes indicating the purpose of the servitude;6.9 sensitive environmental elements within 100 metres of the site or sites including (but not limited thereto):

rivers; the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWA); ridges; cultural and historical features; areas with indigenous vegetation (even if it is degraded or invested with alien species);

6.10 for gentle slopes the 1 metre contour intervals must be indicated on the plan and whenever the slope ofthe site exceeds 1:10, the 500mm contours must be indicated on the plan; and

6.11 the positions from where photographs of the site were taken.

7. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Colour photographs from the centre of the site must be taken in at least the eight major compass directions witha description of each photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix B to this form. It must besupplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site, if applicable.

Eight directional site photos are attached in Appendix B

8. FACILITY ILLUSTRATION

A detailed illustration of the activity must be provided at a scale of 1:200 as Appendix C for activitiesthat include structures. The illustrations must be to scale and must represent a realistic image of theplanned activity. The illustration must give a representative view of the activity.

9. ACTIVITY MOTIVATION

9(a) Socio-economic value of the activityWhat is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? Undetermined - Costs

have not been estimatedas they strongly dependon the current cost ofthe site preferred

What is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result of theactivity?

It is not expected thatthe proposeddevelopment will earnany income – it isprimarily to provide bulkservices to the

existing community.Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? YES

✔NO


8

Is the activity a public amenity? YES NO✔

How many new employment opportunities will be created in the development phaseof the activity?

During the developmentphase of theproposed project it is notenvisaged that anydirect employment willbe created.Contractors will beappointed by the client,Which contractors willbring in their ownworking teamsto complete the project.

What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the developmentphase?

This cannot bequantified as it is notforeseen that anyadditional employmentwillbe generated by theproject.

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? None – it is not foreseenthat any additionalemploymentopportunities will begenerated by theproposed project.

9(b) Need and desirability of the activity

Motivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity):

NEED:1. Was the relevant provincial planning department involved in the application? YES

✔NO

2. Does the proposed land use fall within the relevant provincial planningframework?

YES✔

NO

3. If the answer to questions 1 and / or 2 was NO, please provide further motivation / explanation:

DESIRABILITY:1. Does the proposed land use / development fit the surrounding area? YES

✔NO

2. Does the proposed land use / development conform to the relevant structureplans, SDF and planning visions for the area?

YES✔

NO

3. Will the benefits of the proposed land use / development outweigh the negativeimpacts of it?

YES

✔

NO

4. If the answer to any of the questions 1-3 was NO, please provide further motivation /explanation:

5. Will the proposed land use / development impact on the sense of place? YES NO


9

✔

6. Will the proposed land use / development set a precedent? YES NO✔

7. Will any person’s rights be affected by the proposed land use / development? YES NO✔

8. Will the proposed land use / development compromise the “urban edge”? YES NO✔

9. If the answer to any of the question 5-8 was YES, please provide further motivation /explanation.

BENEFITS:1. Will the land use / development have any benefits for society in general? YES

✔NO

2. Explain:The expected benefits of the proposed project are as follows:

At the local level, the benefits of the project would centre on the creation of temporaryemployment opportunities during the construction phase although very minimal; Eskom wouldmake every effort to source this workforce from local communities as and where appropriate;however, several of the jobs would require a high level of technical skill.

On a regional level, the project would contribute to reliability of power supply. There would alsobe a less tangible but nonetheless important benefit of positioning the municipality on the leadin terms of sustainable energy supply.

On a national level, the project would contribute to implementing South Africa’s new energypolicy as embodied in the White Paper on Energy (DME 1998). The priorities to which thisproject would contribute are laying the groundwork for promoting electrification and off-gridpower supply.

The proposed project is a step towards supporting the Municipality’s Development Strategy asit strongly supports the “Strengthening key economic clusters” located within the municipality. Itis envisaged that in the short- and longer term, neighbouring communities, which encompassesthe Germiston, Bedfordview and Edenvale the planned developments will benefit significantlyas a result of the proposed development.

3. Will the land use / development have any benefits for the local communitieswhere it will be located?

YES✔

NO

4. Explain:The proposed Simmerpan Strengthening will improve the capacity of the electrical network inthe Simmerpan area. It will as a result benefit the residents of Bedfordview, Edenvale andGermiston as they rely on the capacity of this electricity.

10. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES

List all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are applicable to theapplication as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable:

Title of legislation, policy or guideline: Administering authority: Date:Republic of South Africa- Constitution Act 108 of 1996 National and Provincial 1996


10

National Environmental Management Act, Act 107 of1998

National and Provincial 1998

Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations- April2006 (as amended on the18th June 2010)

National and Provincial 2010

National Environmental Management: BiodiversityAct, Act 10 of 2004

National & ProvincialGovernment

2004

National Environmental Management: Air QualityAct, Act 39 of 2004

National & ProvincialGovernment

2004

National Water Act, Act 36 of 1998 National & ProvincialGovernment

1998

National Heritage Act, Act 25 of 1999 National& ProvincialGovernment

1999

Development Facilitation Act, Act 67 of 1995 National & ProvincialGovernment

1995

11. WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT

11(a) Solid waste managementWill the activity produce solid construction waste during the construction/initiationphase?

YES✔

NO

If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? UndeterminedHow will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?Any solid waste produced on site will be collected in suitable containers and removed from site by meansof waste disposal trucks. Further detail on solid waste management is provided in the EnvironmentalManagement Plan. Solid waste could include the following:- Conductor off-cuts;- Old tower steel which will be recycled;- Cable drums (these will be removed for re-use);- Concrete rubble from structure foundations;- Any vegetation cleared; and- General waste produced by construction workersWhere will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?


11

Construction solid waste will be disposed of at the licensed local waste disposal sites (municipal wastestream).Construction wastes will be managed and disposed of in accordance with the attachedEnvironmental Management Plan (EMP) and may include:

Hazardous waste, consisting of substances that may be harmful to the receiving environment, and

therefore require precautionary measures when handled. Examples include (but not limited to) oil,

paint, diesel etc. This type of waste will be disposed of appropriately at a registered waste disposal

site.

General waste, consisting of non-hazardous substances and substances that cannot be recycled.

Examples include (but not limited to) construction rubble, excess construction materials that cannot

be reused, and food waste. This will be disposed collected in a waste skip and disposed off at a

registered site.

Reusable construction material, which can be used at other construction sites will be carefully

packaged and delivered to other sites for reuse.

Recyclable waste shall preferably be deposited in separate bins painted in different colours.

Recyclable material includes paper, tins and glass.

Refuse will at all times be disposed of at a Department of Water Affairs (DWA) registered site, which is

also approved of by the local authority. Refuse will not be burned or buried on or near the site.

Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase? YES✔

NO

If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? Undetermined

How will the solid waste be disposed of (describe)?Waste will be collected and disposed of at a registered waste disposal site.Where will the solid waste be disposed if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream (describe)?It is anticipated that waste will feed into the municipal waste stream, should there be any waste that doesnot feed into the municipal waste stream proper measures will be taken to ensure that it’s disposed offappropriately at a waste registered disposal facility.If the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registered landfill siteor be taken up in a municipal waste stream, then the applicant should consult with the competentauthority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of therelevant legislation?

YES NO✔

If yes, inform the competent authority and request a change to an application for scoping andEIA.Is the activity that is being applied for a solid waste handling or treatmentfacility?

YES NO✔

If yes, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it isnecessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

11(b) Liquid effluent

Will the activity produce effluent, other than normal sewage, that will be disposedof in a municipal sewage system?

YES NO✔

If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month?Will the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of on site? Yes NO

✔


12

If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary tochange to an application for scoping and EIA.

Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of atanother facility?

YES NO✔

If yes, provide the particulars of the facility:Facility name:Contact person:Postal address:Postal code:Telephone: Cell:E-mail: Fax:Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste water, if any:It is anticipated that there will not be any waste water produced, should a situation arise were wastewater is produced, proper measures will be taken to ensure optimal reuse and recycling were possible.

11(c) Emissions into the atmosphere

Will the activity release emissions into the atmosphere? YES✔

NO

If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO✔

If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whetherit is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.If no, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration:It is not envisaged that the proposed project will emit any emissions into the atmosphere that is outsidethe norm.

During the construction phase it is foreseen that carbon emissions will be generated and emitted by thevarious vehicles on site dust may be generated during the construction/initiation phase of the project asconstruction vehicles enter and exit the proposed alignment site, however due to the short stint of thisphase the impact is viewed as negligible.

11(d) Generation of noise

Will the activity generate noise? YES✔

NO

If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO✔

If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whetherit is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.If no, describe the noise in terms of type and level:Noise pollution will occur as a result of construction activities and the impact will be highly localised. Ifmitigated by restricting operations to normal working hours, this will result in a negligible impact of lowsignificance. Further detail on noise management is provided in the Environmental Management Plan.

12. WATER USE


13

Please indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by ticking the appropriate box(es)Municipal✔

water board groundwater river, stream, damor lake

other the activity will not usewater

Water will only be required during the construction phase for the work force and construction activities-this will be obtained from a municipal source.

If water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural feature, pleaseindicatethe volume that will be extracted per month: litresDoes the activity require a water use permit from the Department of Water Affairs? YES NO

✔

If yes, please submit the necessary application to the Department of Water Affairs and attach proofthereof to this application if it has been submitted.

13. ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Describe the design measures, if any, that have been taken to ensure that the activity is energyefficient:Not applicableDescribe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the design ofthe activity, if any:Not applicable

SECTION B: SITE/AREA/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Important notes:1. For linear activities (pipelines, etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be necessary

to complete this section for each part of the site that has a significantly different environment. In suchcases please complete copies of Section C and indicate the area, which is covered by each copy No. onthe Site Plan.

Section C Copy No. (e.g.A):

0

2. Paragraphs 1 - 6 below must be completed for each alternative.

3. Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion ofthis section?

YES NO✔

If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest”

for each specialist thus appointed:All specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D.

Propertydescription/physicaladdress:

Farm Rosherville 280JR and Elandsfontein IR

(Farm name, portion etc.) Where a large number of properties are involved (e.g.linear activities), please attach a full list to this application.


14

In instances where there is more than one town or district involved, please attach alist of towns or districts to this application.

Current land-use zoning: Industrial and Recreational use (Germiston Golf Club and Victoria Lake)

In instances where there is more than one current land-use zoning, please attach alist of current land use zonings that also indicate which portions each use pertainsto , to this application.

Is a change of land-use or a consent use application required? YES NO✔

Must a building plan be submitted to the local authority? YES NO✔

Locality map: An A3 locality map must be attached to the back of this document, as Appendix A.The scale of the locality map must be relevant to the size of the development (atleast 1:50 000. For linear activities of more than 25 kilometres, a smaller scale e.g.1:250 000 can be used. The scale must be indicated on the map.) The map mustindicate the following: an indication of the project site position as well as the positions of the

alternative sites, if any; road access from all major roads in the area; road names or numbers of all major roads as well as the roads that provide

access to the site(s); all roads within a 1km radius of the site or alternative sites; and a north arrow; a legend; and locality GPS co-ordinates (Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude

and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes shouldhave at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection thatmust be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or localprojection)

1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE

Indicate the general gradient of the site.Alternative S1:

Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15✔

1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than1:5

Alternative S2 (if any):Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than

1:5

Alternative S3 (if any):Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than

1:5


15

2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE

Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site:2.1 Ridgeline2.2 Plateau2.3 Side slope of hill/mountain2.4 Closed valley2.5 Open valley2.6 Plain ✔2.7 Undulating plain / low hills2.8 Dune2.9 Seafront

3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE

Is the site(s) located on any of the following (tick the appropriate boxes)?Alternative S1: Alternative S2 (if

any):Alternative S3 (ifany):

Shallow water table (less than1.5m deep)

YES

✔Westernarea of thesite as it isclose toRochervillewetland.

NO YES

✔Westernarea of thesite as it isclose toRochervillewetland.

NO YES NO

Dolomite, sinkhole or dolineareas

YES NO

✔Sites isunderlainbyquartzite.

YES NO

✔Sites isunderlainbyquartzite

YES NO

Seasonally wet soils (oftenclose to water bodies)

YES

✔Only thearea close toRocherville

wetland.

NO YES

✔Only thearea closetoRocherville

wetland.

NO YES NO


16

Unstable rocky slopes or steepslopes with loose soil

YES NO

✔The site isclassifiedas a plain,loose soilsmay beexpectedat areaslocated onslimesdams,which hassteepslopeswith loosesoil ifuncoveredwithvegetation

YES NO

✔The site isclassifiedas a plain,loose soilsmay beexpectedat areaslocated onslimesdams,which hassteepslopeswith loosesoil ifuncoveredwithvegetation

YES NO

Dispersive soils (soils thatdissolve in water)

YES NO

✔The soil isclassifiedas loam

YES NO

✔The soil isclassifiedas loam

YES NO

Soils with high clay content(clay fraction more than 40%)

YES NO

✔The claycontent isbelow40%

YES NO

✔The claycontent isbelow40%

YES NO

Any other unstable soil orgeological feature

YES

✔Slimesdams maybe unstable

NO YES

✔Slimesdams maybe unstable

NO YES NO

An area sensitive to erosion YES

✔Thesteep slopes

of the slimes

dams will be

sensitive to

erosion if not

properly

covered with

vegetation.

NO YES

✔Thesteep slopes

of the slimes

dams will be

sensitive to

erosion if not

properly

covered with

vegetation.

NO YES NO

If you are unsure about any of the above or if you are concerned that any of the above aspects may bean issue of concern in the application, an appropriate specialist should be appointed to assist in thecompletion of this section. (Information in respect of the above will often be available as part of theproject information or at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scaleRegional Geotechnical Maps prepared by the Council for Geo Science may also be consulted).

4. GROUNDCOVER

Indicate the types of groundcover present on the site:

The location of all identified rare or endangered species or other elements should be accuratelyindicated on the site plan(s).


17


Natural veld - goodconditionE

Natural veld withscattered

aliensE✔

Natural veld withheavy alieninfestationE

Veld dominatedby alien

speciesE✔

Gardens

✔

Sport field

✔Cultivated land

Paved surface

✔

Building or otherstructure

✔

Bare soil

✔

Kindly note that the groundcover represented above represents the transact of the proposed powerlines. Site Awhich is considered for the expansion of the substation is covered by Transformed, Highly disturbed Grassland,dominated by weeds, Hyparrhenia hirta, Cynodon dactylon and a few Eucalyptus trees grass.

Alternative 2The transect of the powerline is similar with site A, however, site B which is a considered alternative for theexpansion is covered by both grass and paved surface.

If any of the boxes marked with an “E “is ticked, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in thecompletion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’t have the necessaryexpertise.A specialist has been consulted and the report is attached as Annexure D1.

5. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA

Indicate land uses and/or prominent features that does currently occur within a 500m radius of the siteand give description of how this influences the application or may be impacted upon by the application:

5.1 Natural area5.2 Low density residential5.3 Medium density residential5.4 High density residential5.5 Informal residentialA

5.6 Retail commercial & warehousing5.7 Light industrial ✔5.8 Medium industrial AN ✔5.9 Heavy industrial AN

5.10 Power station5.11 Office/consulting room ✔5.12 Military or police base/station/compound5.13 Spoil heap or slimes damA ✔5.14 Quarry, sand or borrow pit5.15 Dam or reservoir ✔5.16 Hospital/medical centre5.17 School5.18 Tertiary education facility5.19 Church5.20 Old age home5.21 Sewage treatment plantA


18

5.22 Train station or shunting yard N

5.23 Railway line N ✔5.24 Major road (4 lanes or more) N ✔5.25 Airport N ✔5.26 Harbour5.27 Sport facilities ✔5.28 Golf course ✔5.29 Polo fields5.30 Filling station H ✔5.31 Landfill or waste treatment site5.32 Plantation5.33 Agriculture5.34 River, stream or wetland ✔5.35 Nature conservation area5.36 Mountain, koppie or ridge5.37 Museum5.38 Historical building5.39 Protected Area5.40 Graveyard5.41 Archaeological site5.42 Other land uses (describe)

If any of the boxes marked with an “N “are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by theproposed activity?The railway line is not in the vicinity of the proposed site but it is parallel with the access roads that areused to get to the site.

The lines transverses the N3 which is a national road between Jack Shaft and Jupiter substations. Thepotential impact will be traffic obstruction, which will be short term in duration during the constructionphase.

If any of the boxes marked with an "An" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by theproposed activity?The surrounding area of the proposed project is only heavy industrial, so there will not be any huge impact on theproposed project as it is right in the industries and other power lines runs inside the properties of the industrialarea. Should there be any need for mitigation during construction phase, proper mitigation will be considered

If YES, specify and explain:If YES, specify:

If any of the boxes marked with an "H" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by theproposed activity.The filling station is located to the east of the Simmerpan substation; it will not at all be impacted upon by theproposed project.

If YES, specify and explain:If YES, specify:

Alternative 2


19

Land uses for Alternative 2 are similar to Alternative 1.

6. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, asdefined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (ActNo. 25 of 1999), including

YES NO

✔

Archaeological or palaeontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to thesite?

Uncertain

If YES,explain:If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field toestablish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site.Brieflyexplain thefindings ofthe specialist:

The proposed power lines follow existing line servitude through a highly developedarea of Johannesburg that would have destroyed any archaeological or historicalsites. No sites of Heritage significance were identified during the survey and from aheritage point of view there is no reason why the development cannot commence.Detailed Heritage Report attached s Appendix D4.

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO

✔Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National HeritageResources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?

YES NO

✔If yes, please submit or, make sure that the applicant or a specialist submits the necessaryapplication to SAHRA or the relevant provincial heritage agency and attach proof thereof tothis application if such application has been made.

Alternative 2Heritage characteristics for Alternative 2 are similar to Alternative 1.

SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

1. ADVERTISEMENT

The person conducting a public participation process must take into account any guidelines applicableto public participation as contemplated in section 24J of the Act and must give notice to all potentialinterested and affected parties of the application which is subjected to public participation by—

(a) fixing a notice board (of a size at least 60cm by 42cm; and must display the requiredinformation in lettering and in a format as may be determined by the competent authority) at aplace conspicuous to the public at the boundary or on the fence of—(i) the site where the activity to which the application relates is or is to be undertaken; and(ii) any alternative site mentioned in the application;

(b) giving written notice to—(i) the owner or person in control of that land if the applicant is not the owner or person in

control of the land;(ii) the occupiers of the site where the activity is or is to be undertaken or to any alternative

site where the activity is to be undertaken;(iii) owners and occupiers of land adjacent to the site where the activity is or is to be

undertaken or to any alternative site where the activity is to be undertaken;


20

(iv) the municipal councillor of the ward in which the site or alternative site is situated andany organisation of ratepayers that represent the community in the area;

(v) the municipality which has jurisdiction in the area;(vi) any organ of state having jurisdiction in respect of any aspect of the activity; and(vii) any other party as required by the competent authority;

(c) placing an advertisement in—(i) one local newspaper; or(ii) any official Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing public

notice of applications or other submissions made in terms of these Regulations;(d) placing an advertisement in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper, if the

activity has or may have an impact that extends beyond the boundaries of the metropolitan orlocal municipality in which it is or will be undertaken: Provided that this paragraph need notbe complied with if an advertisement has been placed in an official Gazette referred to insubregulation 54(c)(ii); and

(e) using reasonable alternative methods, as agreed to by the competent authority, in thoseinstances where a person is desiring of but unable to participate in the process due to—(i) illiteracy;(ii) disability; or(iii) any other disadvantage.

2. CONTENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES

A notice board, advertisement or notices must:

(a) indicate the details of the application which is subjected to public participation; and(b) state—

(i) that the application has been submitted to the competent authority in terms of theseRegulations, as the case may be;(ii) whether basic assessment or scoping procedures are being applied to the

application, in the case of an application for environmentalauthorisation;

(iii) the nature and location of the activity to which the application relates;(iv) where further information on the application or activity can be obtained; and(iv) the manner in which and the person to whom representations in respect of the

application may be made.

Public notices were placed at conspicuous areas on site on the 17th November 2010 and proof of such has beenincluded in the report as Appendix G1.3.

3. PLACEMENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES

Where the proposed activity may have impacts that extend beyond the municipal area where it islocated, a notice must be placed in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper, indicatingthat an application will be submitted to the competent authority in terms of these regulations, the natureand location of the activity, where further information on the proposed activity can be obtained and themanner in which representations in respect of the application can be made, unless a notice has beenplaced in any Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing notice to the public ofapplications made in terms of the EIA regulations.


21

Advertisements and notices must make provision for all alternatives.

An advertisement was placed on the Germiston City News on the 17th November 2010 and proof of thisadvertisement has been included as Appendix G1.3.

4. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES

The practitioner must ensure that the public participation is adequate and must determine whether apublic meeting or any other additional measure is appropriate or not based on the particular nature ofeach case. Special attention should be given to the involvement of local community structures such asWard Committees, ratepayers associations and traditional authorities where appropriate. Please notethat public concerns that emerge at a later stage that should have been addressed may cause thecompetent authority to withdraw any authorisation it may have issued if it becomes apparent that thepublic participation process was inadequate.

5. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT

The practitioner must record all comments and respond to each comment of the public before theapplication is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a comments and responsereport as prescribed in the EIA regulations and be attached to this application. The comments andresponse report must be attached under Appendix E.

Comments were received from registered I&AP’s and the comment and response report is attached in AppendixE.

6. AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION

Please note that a complete list of all organs of state and or any other applicable authority with theircontact details must be appended to the basic assessment report or scoping report, whichever isapplicable.

A database of stakeholders and registered I&AP’s has been appended as Appendix G1.6.

Authorities are key interested and affected parties in each application and no decision on anyapplication will be made before the relevant local authority is provided with the opportunity to give input.

List of authorities informed:1. Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality2. Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development3. South African Heritage Resources Agency4. Department of Water Affairs

List of authorities from whom comments have been received:


22

All identified authorities were provided with letters to inform them of the proposed projectand to invite them to participate by sending through their comments. Furthermore they werefurnished with draft BA reports for review and comments of which proof of submission viamail and hand delivery have been attached hereto.

Comments have been received from DWA on the 23rd December 2010 stating that theproject is acceptable and approval is recommended.

No other comments have been received to date.

7. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS

Note that, for linear activities, or where deviation from the public participation requirements may be appropriate,the person conducting the public participation process may deviate from the requirements of that subregulation tothe extent and in the manner as may be agreed to by the competent authority.Proof of any such agreement must be provided, where applicable.

Has any comment been received from stakeholders? YES

✔NO

If “YES”, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach copies of any correspondence to andfrom the stakeholders to this application):

Notification letters were sent to all stakeholders listed in the attached database and proof of suchcorrespondence has been attached as Appendix G1.5.

Rotek Engineering asked for a background information document so they can be kept abreastwith the proposed project

Raceway Property Owners Association needed details of the two lines being added and thepositions of the pylons in order to determine the impact on their property as the Eskomservitude borders their properties.

South Africa Civil Aviation Authority requested that they be kept abreast with the project asthey would like to assess the line prior construction.

DWA on the 23rd December 2010 stating that the project is acceptable and approval isrecommended


23

SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The assessment of impacts must adhere to the minimum requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2010, and shouldtake applicable official guidelines into account. The issues raised by interested and affected parties should alsobe addressed in the assessment of impacts.

1. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES

List the main issues raised by interested and affected parties.

Main issues raised include the following:

Potential impacts on properties were the power line transverses.

Response from the practitioner to the issues raised by the interested and affected parties (A fullresponse must be given in the Comments and Response Report that must be attached to this report asAnnexure E):Nsovo responded that the proposed project is an upgrade of existing lines; therefore no additionalimpacts on properties are expected as there will not be any addition of lines. Impacts that may beexpected will be potential noise and traffic during the construction phase. Nsovo further confirmed thatEskoms approach to projects of this nature is that on completion of the EIA phase they will havenegotiations with affected landowners to ensure that their conditions are catered for.

2. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSEDMANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES

List the potential direct, indirect and cumulative property/activity/design/technology/operationalalternative related impacts (as appropriate) that are likely to occur as a result of the planning anddesign phase, construction phase, operational phase, decommissioning and closure phase, includingimpacts relating to the choice of site/activity/technology alternatives as well as the mitigation measuresthat may eliminate or reduce the potential impacts listed.

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)


24

Impacts Resulting from the Planning and Design Phase

Direct Impacts:

Employment Creation

The planning and design of the development requires input from various individuals, resulting in the employment

opportunities for such persons. This additional employment would include both direct (e.g. Environmental Consultants,

Engineers, Project Managers, Planners, etc) and indirect (e.g. reviewing and commenting authorities such as the local

authority planning authorities and the environmental authorities). The extent and magnitude of this impact is relatively low

compared to the other economic impacts, and is typically restricted to a limited number of professionals.

All the identified alternatives are likely to result in the same level of significance for this impact. Only the No-go

Alternative would differ in that this impact would not occur.

IssueCorrective

measures

Impact rating criteriaSignificance

Nature Extent Duration Magnitude Probability

Employment

Creation

No Positive 3 2 8 4 (30-60) Medium

Yes N/A N/A N/A N./A N/A

Corrective

Actions

No mitigation measures have been identified.

Indirect Impacts: None identified

Cumulative Impacts: None identified

Alternative 2 (Substation Expansion Locality Site B)

Impacts identified for the planning and design phase are similar to the ones for the preferred alternative.

No-go alternative

Direct Impacts: The no-go alternative would result in the benefit of additional employment opportunities not

occurring. None of the impacts identified for the proposed activity will occur (including positive and negative impacts) if

the proposed activity does not proceed.



Impacts Resulting from the Construction Phase



25

Direct Impacts:

Loss of biodiversity and habitat

During construction some plants species may be removed on the proposed site’s footprint. The various form of flora

noted on site include transformed highly disturbed grassland dominated by weeds, alien trees, and wetland with wetland

species. The fauna identified were birds, and other small flying and crawling insects. The impact on flora and fauna will

be low in significance as most vegetation is highly transformed with low conservation value and only vegetation along the

route will be removed to clear the site for construction. However the impact on wetland vegetation on the eastern locality

will be medium in significance. With proper mitigation such as adherence to the 32m buffer zone from the edge of the

wetland the impact may be reduced to low.

Every effort should be made to minimize the disturbance to the surrounding vegetation with specific reference to the

highly sensitive wetland and spruit systems which has conservation value. Implementation of the suggested corrective

measures will ensure that this impact has a low level of significance.

IssueCorrective

measures

Impact rating criteria

Significance


Loss of

biodiversity and

habitat

No Negative 2 4 6 3(30-60)

Medium

Yes Negative 1 3 2 1


26

Soil erosion may occur during the construction phase primarily at areas underlain by slimes dams. Provided that

adequate soil erosion measures are implemented during the construction phase of the proposed activity, this impact can

be deemed to be of low significance.

IssueCorrective

measures


Significance


Soils and

erosion

No Negative 2 2 6 3


27

Construction activities on site will lead to land clearing and disturbance of the soil resulting in minor dust creation. During

construction, movement of construction vehicles also represents temporary, but imperative sources of respirable

particulates and dust deposition. Given the nature and magnitude of the proposed project it is anticipated that very little

dust will be generated from the construction activities. The potential impact on air quality will be short term and can be

controlled. Proper implementation of recommended corrective measures will reduce the impact to become insignificant

and of very low probability. It is therefore anticipated that this impact will be limited and of low negative significance.

IssueCorrective

measures


Significance


Air pollution

No Negative 2 1 4 4


28

measuresNature Extent Duration Magnitude Probability

Surface

and ground

water

pollution

No Negative 3 3 6 3 (30-60)= Medium



29

No burning of waste is allowed on site.

Waste must be regularly removed from site and disposed of at a registered waste

disposal facility.

Impact on fauna

Permanent faunal habitat disruption is likely to result from the footprint of the development. This would result fromvegetation clearing and removal of trees that served as habitat for animal species prior to construction. It is howevernoted that the scale of this development is not likely to have a significant impact on the displacement of fauna or evenwithin the property boundary. It is anticipated that the loss of biodiversity for the proposed site and its surroundings willbe negative, site specific and of low significance.

IssueCorrective

measures


Significance


Impact on

fauna and

flora

No Negative 2 3 2 3


30

Surrounding residents should be notified in advance of construction schedules.

Working hours must be restricted to daytime only (8am – 5pm).

Safety and security

During construction, humans beings in the area may be at risk as a result of on-site activities (e.g. falling into holes, being

knocked over by vehicles etc.). The significance of the potential impacts on human safety without the corrective actions

(adequate safety measures in dangerous areas) is considered to be of medium significance. The implementation of

corrective actions could reduce the impacts to a low level of significance.

IssueCorrective

measures


Significance


Safety and

security

NoNegative

3 2 6 3(30-60)

Medium



31

The storage of fuel and other flammable solvents on site, during construction increase the risk of fire on the site. It is

anticipated that the uncontrolled fires on site could cause damage to infrastructure and the biophysical environment and

impact on the social environment. This impact is considered to be of medium significance. Should the recommended

mitigation measures be implemented, the significance of the impact will remain negative but low.

IssueCorrective

measures


Significance


Fire hazards

No Negative 2 2 6 3 (30-60) medium



32

may be a likelihood of migrant workers (including unskilled labourers) moving into the area in search of employment.

These workers could have an impact on the social structures present in the local communities due to the lengthy period

of construction. With the implementation of the suggested mitigation measures the significance of the impact can be

reduced from medium to low all being negative.

IssueCorrective

measures


Significance


Influx of job

seekers

NoNegative

4 3 6 3(30-60)

Medium



33

Alternative 2 (Substation Locality Site B)Impacts identified for the construction phase are similar to the ones for the preferred alternative.

No-go Alternative

Direct Impacts: None of the impacts identified for the proposed activity will occur (including positive

and negative impacts) if the proposed activity does not proceed

Indirect Impacts: None Identified


Impacts Associated with the Operational Phase


Direct Impacts:

Bird collision and electrocutions

Direct interactions occur when birds collide with power lines, possibly because they fail to see the wires as they are

focusing on something that lies beyond, e.g. a perch or food source. Birds might also be killed by striking power lines

support structures .The likelihood of birds colliding with power lines depends on:

The siting of the power lines in the landscape differences in vegetation, topography, elevation and species composition

can influence risk, as can proximity to food sources and roosting areas; power lines placed in valleys, on ridges, near

water or on steep hillsides are dangerous to birds.

The type of birds being considered - Medium to large birds are generally at higher risk; day flying raptors, especially

buzzards, eagles, griffons and kestrels, certain pigeons, owls, and (possibly) coots are higher risk. Particular species may

be more at risk, as their flight characteristics differ.

Major risks to birds that may be caused by the proposed facilities during the operation phase include collision, faulting,

and electrocutions. However, the much urbanised area with high levels of existing degradation and disturbance may

mean that the area is not sensitive for avifauna and that the sensitive species are unlikely to occur in the study area.

Given that the proposed project’s magnitude and its existence in relation to the already existing lines the additional

impacts can be considered to be local, long term, high probability and significant, but with proper mitigation the impact

will be reduced low.

IssueCorrective

measures



Bird collision and No Negative 1 4 1 2


34

electrocutions

Yes Neutral 1 4 1 2


35

IssueCorrective

measures



Employment

creation

No Positive 3 4 8 4 >60 = High

Yes

Corrective

Actions

No mitigation

Indirect Impacts : None identified.

Cumulative Impacts : None identified.

Alternative 2 (Substation Locality B)Impacts identified for the operational phase are similar to the ones for the preferred alternative.

No-go alternative:

Direct Impacts: None of the impacts identified for the proposed activity will occur (including positive

and negative impacts) if the proposed activity does not proceed

Indirect Impacts: None Identified


Impacts Associated with the Decommissioning Phase

At present it is not anticipated that the proposed infrastructure will ever be decommissioned. Ongoing

maintenance and upgrades, where necessary, will be carried out. In the unlikely event that

decommissioning is necessary it is recommended that the potential impacts identified below are

reviewed and a detailed decommissioning strategy and rehabilitation plan is prepared and

implemented.


36

Direct Impacts:

Waste

The decommissioning of the proposed project will contribute to large amounts of waste material that will be produced.The decommissioning may also contribute to a large portion of bare soil being exposed to erosion if not rehabilitatedproperly.

Rating criteriaWaste materialWithout Corrective Action With Corrective Action

Nature/Extent Regional (3) Regional (3)Duration Long term (4) Short term (2)Intensity/ Magnitude High (8) Moderate (6)Probability High (4) Medium (3)Significance (30 – 60) Medium (30 – 60) MediumStatus Negative Negative

Corrective ActionsDisposal of waste at a registered waste disposal site.Non-hazardous material should be recycled and utilised in other constructionprocesses.An appropriate rehabilitation plan should be in place.Only indigenous vegetation should be utilised during rehabilitation.Rehabilitation success should be monitored.

Dust generationDecommissioning of the facility and other infrastructure may lead to an increased amount of airborne particles in the localatmosphere as the infrastructure is dismantled and transported to the disposal site. The significance of this impact willbe of low negative significance.

IssueCorrectivemeasures

Impact

Nature Extent Duration Magnitude Probability Significance

Dustgeneration

NoNegative

2 1 4 428Low

YesNegative

2 1 4 321Low

CorrectiveActions

Dust suppression techniques must be implemented.

.Soil ErosionThe clearing of vegetation, as well as the exposing of soil during decommissioning of the facilities may lead to erosion ofthese surfaces due to rain and wind. It is anticipated that the significance of this impact can be reduced from mediumnegative to low negative significance with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.

IssueCorrectivemeasures

ImpactSignificance


Soil Erosion

NoNegative

1 3 6 330Medium

YesNegative

1 2 6 3 27 Low

CorrectiveActions

Re-vegetation of disturbed surfaces should be conducted as soon as reasonably possible.Areas that have not been allocated alternative uses following the decommissioning should berehabilitated and re-vegetated.


37

Alternative 2 (Substation Locality Site B)Impacts identified for the decommissioning phase are similar to the ones for the preferred alternative.

No-go alternative

Direct Impacts: None of the impacts identified for the proposed activity will occur. If the proposed infrastructure is not

to be decommissioned, it will require continuous maintenance and the measures identified for the operational phase must

be continued. Efforts for continual improvement must be encouraged.



3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Taking the assessment of potential impacts into account, please provide an environmental impactstatement that summarises the impact that the proposed activity and its alternatives may have on theenvironment after the management and mitigation of impacts have been taken into account, withspecific reference to types of impact, duration of impacts, likelihood of potential impacts actuallyoccurring and the significance of impacts.

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)Certain factors have been taken into account when assessing the impact of the proposed activity on theenvironment

FACTORS COMMENTS

A transformation of a locality No transformation of a locality is required.

Any environmental impact on the ecosystems ofthe locality

The proposed activity is not expected to haveany long term impacts on the ecosystems of thelocality. Mitigation measures are proposed toprotect surrounding aquatic ecology and waterquality.

Any reduction of the aesthetic, recreational,scientific or other environmental quality or valueof a locality;

No reduction of the environmental quality of thelocality is expected.

Any effect upon a locality, place or buildinghaving aesthetic, anthropological, archaeological,architectural, cultural, historical, scientific orsocial significance or other special value forpresent or futuregenerations

The proposed site contains no known heritagesites.

Any impact on the habitat of protected fauna(within the meaning of the National Parks andWildlife Act 1974);

The proposed site is not known to have anyhabitat of protected fauna.

Any endangering of any species of animal, plantor other form of life, whether living on land, inwater or in the air;

No species of animal or plant is expected to beendangered by the proposed activities.

Any long-term effects on the environment No long term effect on the environment is


38

expected.

Any degradation of the quality of theenvironment;

No significant degradation of the quality of theenvironment is expected. Mitigation measureswould be employed to ensure no significantdegradation of the environment.

Any risk to the safety of the environmentNo risk to the safety of the environment isexpected.

Any pollution of the environment

The proposed activity is not expected to result inlong term pollution of the environment. Mitigationmeasures are proposed to ensure pollution isrestricted to short term localised effects.

Any environmental problems associated with thedisposal of waste

No long term environmental problems areexpected associated with the disposal of thematerial.

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PHASE

Impacts associated with the planning and development phase of the proposed activity includes thecreation of job opportunities for skilled engineers and planning professions. This positive impact will bedefinite and short term in duration. No significant negative impact has been associated with this phaseand the proposed activity.

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

The positive impacts identified for this phase include job creation and a positive economic outlook forthe province and the country at large, these impacts will be enhanced in order to maximise the benefits.Impacts associated with the construction phase of the proposed activity can be regarded as being of lowsignificance. The negative impacts include visual impact from the construction which will be short termand low in significance; air pollution during excavation and foundation digging will be a negative shortterm impact which is low in significance; ecological was also rated low in significance given that theproposed site is already disturbed. Two wetlands were identified as ecological features of significance inclose proximity to the site which will require proper management. Potential pollution on ground andsurface water has been noted as a potential negative impact which is short term in duration and ifmanaged it’s a low impact. With corrective measures in place none of the identified negative impactsare considered to be a fatal flaw.

OPERATIONAL PHASE

No significant negative impact can be associated with the operational phase of the proposed activity,impacts identified included visual impacts and bird collisions which are rated low considering the alreadyexisting structures. The positive impacts associated with the operational phase include job creation forthe locals.

DECOMMISIONING PHASE

No significant impacts have been identified for the decommissioning phase of the proposed activity


39

since decommissioning will not take place for the proposed activity in the foreseeable future. However, ifdecommissioning were to take place it will have a negative impact due to job losses and wastegeneration.

Alternative 2 (Site B)The environmental impact for this alternative are similar to those of alternative 1, therefore the impactstatement is the same except that more noise, dust generation and waste will be expected during theconstruction phase if the concrete patch is been considered.

No-go alternative (compulsory)The no-go alternative was assessed to not been an option given the economic and social benefits of theproposed project which far outweighs other identified impacts. If the no-go is considered none of theidentified impacts will be realised.


40

SECTION E. RECOMMENDATION OF PRACTITIONER

Is the information contained in this report and the documentation attached heretosufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for (in the view of theenvironmental assessment practitioner)?

YES

✔NO

If “NO”, indicate the aspects that should be assessed further as part of a Scoping and EIA process before adecision can be made (list the aspects that require further assessment):

If “YES”, please list any recommended conditions, including mitigation measures that should beconsidered for inclusion in any authorisation that may be granted by the competent authority in respectof the application:Based on the studies undertaken it is recommended that Alternative 1 which is the preferred alternative

for the proposed project be considered over Alternative 2. The recommended option entails the

construction of the following structures and infrastructure:

2x400kV approximately 1km line between Jupiter and New Jupiter B MTS; 132kV line between Jupiter MTS, Jack Shaft S/S and New Simmerpan MTS; Operate Jupiter – Simmerpan 1&2 88kV line at 275kV and connect 1st and 2nd 275/132kV 250MVA

transformers at Simmerpan MTS; Widen the existing Jupiter-Simmerpan 1&2 275kV 6km servitude to 400kV servitude; and Expansion of the Simmerpan MTS on site A which entails is the grass patch opposite the Victoria

Lake.

Environmental Management Plan (EMP) has been prepared by the consultant and it is hoped that it will

serve as the key reference of the EAPs recommendations Eskom’s policies that are already in place.

The EMP will include measures proposed to mitigate any adverse impacts of the activities and the

monitoring. Some of the key recommendation include:

Areas outside of the footprint and reasonable construction access to be marked as no-go areas.

Implement erosion control measures where applicable.

Maintenance done on construction vehicles must be done off site.

Rehabilitate after construction

Whilst the proposed project specifically is not anticipated to add significantly to the current ambient

noise levels it is recommended that noise be reduced at all times

The attached construction EMP must be implemented and adhered to in order to minimize all

potential negative impacts and to enhance positive impacts where applicable

The Western locality is close to the proposed new substation A and B. The wetland is to the Westand south of site A. The wetland also feeds into the Natalspruit, it is recommended that thedevelopment of the substation adhere to the 32m buffer zone from the edge of the wetland to ensureminimum disturbance.

The eastern locality is directly east of the N3 highway, between the highway and old mine dumps.The wetland stretches north-south along the N3, towards the south the wetland feeds into theNatalspruit. It is recommended that as the Eskom line cross the wetland, pylons in the wetland mustbe avoided.

If during construction any possible heritage finds are made, the operations must be stopped and aqualified archaeologist be contacted for an assessment of the find.

It is recommended that the extension of the Simmerpan MTS be approved for the proposed siteacross the Victoria lake as it will allow for easier alignment of the lines from the substation.

All recommendation made by the specialist must be taken into consideration. Nsovo recommend the widening of the trenches and alternatives of site 1


41

Is an EMPr attached? YES

✔NO

The EMPr must be attached as Appendix F.

EMP Attatched


42

SECTION F: APPENDIXES

The following appendixes must be attached as appropriate:

Appendix A: Site plan(s)

Appendix B: Photographs

Appendix C: Facility illustration(s)

Appendix D: Specialist reports

Appendix E: Comments and responses report

Appendix F: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)

Appendix G: Other information

basic assessment report · 2018. 8. 5. · basic assessment report 1 (for official use only) file...

Documents