basic problems in perception - university of...
TRANSCRIPT
1
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 1
Basic Problems in Perception
Lesson II: Perceptionmodule 07
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 2
What are general problems of perception?
Sensations and relevant physical dimensions– Which physical events are we sensitive to?
Ambiguity of sensory stimuli– How can we perceive a coherent, meaningful scene if
many parts are uncertain?
Perceptual invariants– What are statistical properties of the perceptual
world that our mind can use to infer structure?
Gestalt psychology and gestalt laws– What are basic laws governing perceived structure?
Perceptual illusions and errors– How can we explain the utility of perception if it also
produces a large number of illusions and errors?
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 3
Perception - image of the external world?
The phenomenology of perception– Effortless, clear, few uncertainties– Continuous, stable, image of the external world– Identical across perceivers, people
Perception as a scientific question– How does our mind create percepts (mental
representation of a stimulus) out of the multitude ofsometimes ambiguous information?
– What physical dimension and information are humansensory systems sensitive to?
– How is this information processed to produce stableand persistent percepts?
– How can we recognize objects and scenes?
2
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 4
From sensation to percept
Different sensory modalities– Vision = light of different wavelengths– Audition = sounds of different frequencies– Smell = chemical / target molecules– Taste = chemical / target molecules– Touch = pressure and vibration– Thermal = infrared (longer) wavelength– Proprioception = internal (muscles, joints, vestibular)
Processing in designated sensory system– Conversion of physical stimulus (e.g., light) to neural
response in receptor and …– … transmission of receptor signal to thalamus and cortical
sensory areas (e.g., visual cortex)– Highly specific processing at multiple levels
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 5
Selectivity of senses
Different organisms, different senses– Dog - enhanced sense of smell, reduced vision– Bat - ultrasonic communication & echolocation– Shark - detection of electromagnetic fields
Senses are adapted to the specific behaviors andspecific environment of an organism
The sensed and perceived world thus differsdramatically for different organisms
Human sensory processing is also variable– Extreme cases: blindness, deafness
Color deficiencies in visual perception– Approx. 7% of males red-green deficient (<1% females)– Approx. <1% totally color blind
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 6
Can you make out any numbers?
3
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 7
Ishihara color tables
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 8
Sense and Sensibility
As different organisms are sensitive to differentphysical stimuli, people’s senses differ in theirsensitivity to available physical stimulation
More examples– Sensitivity to high acoustic frequencies drops over
the lifetime of an individual. As a consequence,mature adults have more trouble following aconversation in a noisy environment.
– One approach to overcoming sensory disabilitiesuses sensory prosthetics like a cochlear implant foraudition (fairly common) or an artificial retina forvision (very rare)
– Technology enables humans to extend their sensoryarsenal to otherwise inaccessible physical dimensions
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 9
Sensation vs. Perception
The distal stimulus– Refers to the physical object in the environment that
is giving rise to sensory changes; stable
The proximal stimulus– The resulting sensory stimulation at the receptors– Can vary greatly (e.g., the size of an object’s image
on the retina increases with decreasing distance)
Sensation– Deals with the sensory processing of physical
stimulation
Perception– Deals with the interpretation of sensory stimulation
4
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 10
Seeing what is not there…
Perception does not just reflect the direct resultof sensory processing
Processing of visual information leads to anorganization and interpretation of stimuli– Perception organizes and integrates sensory events– Perceptual constancies– Grouping of perceptual objects and events– Semantic interpretation of perceptions
Final stages of processing produce the percept ofa unified, meaningful, three-dimensional scene
Let’s look at some examples …
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 11
Your blind spot
One of the best examples that you are activelyadding to the sensory events in your perception
Are there any holes in your perception of the world?– Look around you– Did you find any?
Each eye has one area where the optical nerve exitsthe retina where no visual information can beregistered
Even though we cannot see things in that spot(blind spot), our brains fill in something that makessense
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 12
The Penrose triangle
5
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 13
What is odd about the Penrose triangle?
Why do we perceive an impossible 3D-object?– Each corner is possible– The connection of the corners lead to inconsistencies
Why do we perceive only one 3D-object?– For any line drawing, there are an infinite number of
three dimensional objects that could produce theselines in a two-dimensional projection
Why don’t we perceive a possible 3D-object?– There are an infinite number of possible objects that
viewed from one viewpoint would lead to this image
We will encounter more examples of the selectiveperceptions - injecting expectations and bias intothe interpretation of physical stimulation
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 14
Interpreting brightness and illumination
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 15
Seeing occluders that aren’t there
6
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 16
Perceptual invariants
Many ambiguities and illusions are resolved under“ecological” perceptual conditions - adding depth,time & movement, and multimodality
Unlike the previous focus on perceptual “error”,perceptual invariants describe characteristics ofthe environment that carry important informationabout the structure of the external world
Examples– Optical flow during observer movement– Doppler-effect (pitch change) for moving objects
We will encounter this view again in module 08when talking about James Gibson’s theory ofdirect (ecological) perception
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 17
Organization of visual perception
The law of prägnanz– Visual elements are organized to achieve the
simplest and most parsimonious interpretation of thedistal stimulus
Gestalt laws of grouping– Figure-ground segmentation– Grouping by proximity– Grouping by similarity– Grouping by continuity– Grouping by common fate– Grouping by symmetry
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 18
Gestalt laws of proximity and similarity
7
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 19
Continuity, common fate & symmetry
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 20
Grouping vs. good continuation
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 21
Grouping vs. good continuation
8
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 22
Perceptual constancies
Visual perceptions are built across many saccadesand from different view points
Retinal images differ dramatically,yet the percept doesn’t
Types of perceptual constancies– Size constancy– Shape constancy– Brightness constancy– Color constancy– … etc.
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 23
Depth perception and size constancy
Size constancy– The retinal projection of an object changes with
distance, but the object is perceived the same
How do we perceive depth?– Monocular depth cues
• Depth cues that are used in 2D depictions of space• texture gradients, relative size, interposition, linear
perspective, aerial perspective, height in the pictureplane, motion parallax
• Accommodation - muscle contractions
– Binocular depth cues• Binocular convergence• Binocular disparity
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 24
Depth illusions: The Ponzo illusion
9
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 25
Shape illusions
CognitivePsychologyCognitivePsychology
University of Idaho © Steffen Werner - 2004Perception.07. 26
What illusions teach us about perception
Human perception has evolved to enable us tointeract with the external world
Perceptual information often is ambiguous, andperception uses heuristics and assumptions aboutthe physical world to make sense of it
Illusions are examples of situations whichhighlight the underlying processing assumptionsby producing odd results
In each illusion we can find basic principles ofperception at work that are well-adapted and thatproduce useable results in most situations