basis of health education
TRANSCRIPT
PATIENT EDUCATION
Components of the Diabetes TeamComponents of the Diabetes Team The Ideal ScenarioThe Ideal Scenario
DietitianDietitian EndocrinologistEndocrinologistNurse EducatorNurse Educator Exercise TherapistExercise Therapist
Case ManagerCase Manager
PCPPCP
Patient Education
Change of the Attitude and Behavior towards common health problems for better control or reduce its complication
Goal of Health Education
1. Knowledge2. Improvement , development and corrects skills3. Change attitudes and believes
LIFE STYLE MODIFICATION
STAGES OF PATIENT HEATH EDUCATION
1. Explanation of details2. Convinced by the knowledge given 3. Change believe4. Application attitude5. Transformation of recipient to donor health educator
WHO PERFORM THE HEATH EDUCATION
1.Physicians2.Nurses3.Dieteticien4.Social support5.Volunteers6.Patients themselves
Characteristics of Health educator
•Good Knowledge & experience•Good listener•Good observer•Simplicity•Repetition & Concentration•Speech tone and expression•Verbal & visual communication•Avoid scientific terms•Respect •Accepting errors
Factors in The recipient
1. Interest 2. Concentration3. The capability to change the attitude
Factors Affecting the Process of Learning
1.Time2.Place3.Intellectual ability4.Motive
The Subject must be :
short
ClearComplete
Plan For health education program
What are the goal
Who will do it
Content of knowledge & skills
When & to who
Duration &cost
THE WAY USED
• Person to person• Small groups• Large group lecture• Media: Newspaper Radio T V Pamphlets
Person to person education
Influence and effective
Friendship environment
Convenient to newly discovered
Disadvantage : Time consuming
Success depend on Welcoming & friendship environmentExpression and voice pitch changesSelection of subjectSimplicity, clarity, local accentGood occasion to ask questions
Person to person
Small group health education
No from 8 to 12
Done on short interval Once weekly on 6 sessionsNot more than 60-90 minutes
Selection of the groupType of diseaseAge & sexSpecial situation pregnancyIntellectual levelPrevious attendance
Encourage DiscussionSelf experience
Some beneficial notes in group education
Stop and ask questionsSummarize before transition from point to pointNo blame for wrong answerUse verbal and visual expressionTell small story to increase attentionSkills explained on vivid examples and tools
Education of large group
Communication with audience weakerLow degree of retention
PrerequisitesClear goalGood LecturerGood comfortable placeGood preparationSelection of the groupDuration 20 to 25 minutesAllow enough time for discussionUse audio visual aidsSimple language Summarize the lecture
Patient Education through the Media TV, Videocassette……
Easy to large no in short time and attractiveCan be repeated
DisadvantagesIncrease knowledge but not the attitudeMisunderstandingNot free from marketing influence
Evaluation of educational program
Degree of disease controlBld sugar, Wt,Glycated Hb, Lipids, Bld pressure
Prevalence of acute and chronic complication
Evaluation of the degree of retentionPre and post program questionnaireSkills direct observation
Continuous health education and repetition
Interventions to Improve Quality of Care
Luigi Meneghini, MD, MBADiabetes Research Institute (DRI)
University of Miami School of MedicineII PAHO-DOTA Workshop on Quality of Diabetes Care
DRI, 14–16 May 2003
Mastering Your Diabetes Metabolic & Psychosocial Outcomes
Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES)Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES)The DES is a valid and reliable survey of patient The DES is a valid and reliable survey of patient empowerment which yields an overall empowerment empowerment which yields an overall empowerment score based on all 28 items and three subscale scores score based on all 28 items and three subscale scores (range for all scales: 1.0-5.0). Improvement was evident (range for all scales: 1.0-5.0). Improvement was evident on all DES scales for participants in the MYD pilot on all DES scales for participants in the MYD pilot study, despite high baseline values.study, despite high baseline values.
Diabetes Empowerment ScaleDiabetes Empowerment Scale PretestPretest PosttestPosttest 3mF/U3mF/UOverall empowermentOverall empowerment 4.1 4.24.1 4.2 4.3* 4.3*Managing psychosocial aspects Managing psychosocial aspects 3.9 4.23.9 4.2 4.2 4.2Dissatisfaction/readiness to changeDissatisfaction/readiness to change 4.3 4.54.3 4.5 4.6* 4.6*Setting/ achieving diabetes goalsSetting/ achieving diabetes goals 4.0 4.04.0 4.0 4.1 4.1(*P<0.05 v. baseline)(*P<0.05 v. baseline)
Quality of Life & Self-EfficacyQuality of Life & Self-EfficacyMeasures of both Quality of Life (QOL) and Self-Measures of both Quality of Life (QOL) and Self-Efficacy showed statistically significant improvement Efficacy showed statistically significant improvement following the intervention. At the three month follow-up following the intervention. At the three month follow-up the most significant improvement in QOL sub-scales the most significant improvement in QOL sub-scales was for Satisfaction (p=0.0113).was for Satisfaction (p=0.0113).
8.848.84
8.018.01
7.657.65
8.108.10
7.507.50
6.806.80
7.007.00
7.207.20
7.407.40
7.607.60
7.807.80
8.008.00
8.208.20
8.408.40
8.608.60
8.808.80
Mea
n H
bA
1c %
Mea
n H
bA
1c %
Mo 1-3Mo 1-3Pre-Pre-MYDMYD
* p<0.05 v. pre-MYD* p<0.05 v. pre-MYD
Mo 4-6Mo 4-6 Mo 7-9Mo 7-9 Mo 10-12Mo 10-12
**
**
**
Impact of Comprehensive Impact of Comprehensive Diabetes Management ProgramDiabetes Management Program
Source: Rubin RJ, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83: 2635.
$406
$362
$182
$135
$84$76$44$45
$66$76
$29$30
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
Ave
rag
e C
ost
per
mem
ber
/mo
nth
Total Inpatient Outpatient MD Drugs Other
Baseline (54,186 member months) Follow-up (55,879 member months)
* Total costs decreased by $44 per member/month (10.9%) which would translate into savings of $528,000 in the first year for a plan with 1000 members with diabetes. Break-even at 1,265 members with diabetes as per DTCA.