beach fill at two coasts of different configurations

Upload: nguyen-thanh-luan

Post on 03-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Beach Fill at Two Coasts of Different Configurations

    1/15

    CHAPTER 7 7

    Beach

    fillattwocoastsofdifferentconfigurations

    +

    IchiroDeguchi

    and

    Toru

    Sawaragi

    ABSTRACT

    Movements

    f

    orrow

    and

    eplenished

    t

    wo

    oasts

    f

    ifferent

    configurationsrenvestigatedynalyzingheopographic

    ata

    whichereurveyederiodicallyfterheeach

    ill

    lacements.

    One

    s

    ong

    traight

    each

    nd

    orrow

    andaslacedehind

    submerged

    reakwater.

    nother

    s

    ocket

    eachhichas

    n

    rc-

    shoreline

    with

    groyne

    at

    one

    end

    and

    aheadlandatanother.

    It

    s

    ound

    hat

    he

    mountf

    orrow

    andoved

    n

    he

    ong-

    shoreirection

    urpasses

    he

    mountforrowandransportedn

    theross-shoreirectionegardless

    f

    he

    hapef

    he

    oast.

    clearorrelations

    lso

    oundetweenisplacementsfhoreline

    andhangesfectional

    reas.

    heseesultsmplyhathee-

    formation

    f

    he

    rtificiallyourished

    each

    nd

    he

    issipation

    rate

    ofborrow

    sandcanbe

    predicted

    by

    theso-calledne-line theory.

    1. Introduction

    Artificial

    eachourishment

    sommonly

    tilized

    pproach

    for

    reatment

    f

    horerotectionroblemsuchseachrosion,

    wavever-toppingndon.

    t

    s

    lso

    heirect

    ethod

    o

    maintainand

    improve

    recreational

    benefits

    in

    thecoastal zone.

    Inapan,herereanyoasts

    here

    eachillaveeen

    already

    eplenished.

    theseoasts,tructuresuchsnff-

    shore

    ubmerged

    reakwater,

    etached

    reakwater

    nd

    royne

    haveeenonstructed

    imultaneously

    nrderorevent

    each

    ill

    from

    flowing

    ut

    from

    he

    replenished

    field.

    Howeverecausehe

    ffective

    eachillesignnvolveso

    manyhysicalactors,hereciseegreefeachilltilization

    to

    stabilizea

    shoreline is

    notalwayspredictable.

    The

    bjective

    fhis

    tudy

    s

    o

    nvestigate

    ehaviors

    f

    beachilleplenishedtwooastsfifferentonfigulationsy

    analyzing

    uccessivelyeasured

    each

    rofiles

    o

    ffer

    nformations

    as

    ohats

    he

    overning

    actor

    n

    heeterminationfhe

    effctiveness

    of

    beach

    fill.

    +Associate

    rofessor

    nd

    +

    Professor,

    epartment

    f

    ivil

    Engineering,

    saka

    niversity,amadaoka

    -1,

    uita-city,saka

    565, Japan

    1032

  • 8/11/2019 Beach Fill at Two Coasts of Different Configurations

    2/15

    BEACHFILL

    AT

    TWO

    COASTS

    1 0 3 3

    2 .

    Conf

    igulations

    of

    Two

    Coasts

    and

    Locationof

    Beach

    Fill

    Locations

    of

    twocoastsareshown

    i n

    Fig.l.

    Keino-Matsubara

    Beach

    S e t o

    Inland

    Sea

    Osaka

    Asakawaeach

    Pacific

    cean

    Fig.l

    Locations

    of investigated

    tw oeaches

    One

    s

    e

    ino-Matsubara-Beach

    hich

    s

    n

    he

    ast

    ide

    f

    he

    Awaji

    sland

    acing

    he

    eto

    nland

    ea

    nd

    as

    ong

    traight

    beachf

    bout

    kmongshownn

    ig.

    2 a).nhisoast,est

    offshore

    ubmerged

    reakwaterf0mongnd0mideas

    irst

    constructedn983nd

    orrow

    and

    fbout000m

    3

    aseplenished

    behind

    itabout

    ne

    yearafter

    the

    construction

    of

    the

    breakwater.

    Thepperurfacefheubmergedreakwatersbout.5m

    below

    .L..

    .W.L.,.W.L.nd.W.L.orrespondo.L.+1.8m,

    D.L.+1.2m

    nd.L.+0.5m.

    heater

    epth

    as

    easured

    pward

    rom

    D.L..

    he

    verage

    eachlpoe

    s

    bout/7o/10n

    he

    hallow

    water

    eg

    ion sha

    lower

    han

    2m)

    nd

    bout

    /30

    n

    he

    eeper

    resion.

    ean

    rain

    ize

    5

    o

    anges

    rom

    .2mm

    o

    mm

    nd

    here

    s

    no

    orrelation

    etween

    5

    o

    nd

    ater

    epth.

    ean

    raion

    izef

    borrow

    sand

    is

    1.5mm.

    These

    data

    aresummerized

    in

    Table 1.

    Figure

    b)

    ndicates

    ocation

    f

    he

    ubmerged

    reakwater

    andhe

    egion

    here

    each

    ill

    ouldelaced

    ased

    n

    he

    measuredeachrofile

    ust

    fter

    heonstruction

    f

    he

    ubmerged

    breakwater.

    Another

    ssakawa-Beachhichso-calledocketeachnd

    has

    n

    rc-shoreline

    f

    bout

    00m

    ong

    nd

    he

    adius

    f

    hich

    s

    260m

    s

    hown

    n

    ig.3.

    here

    s

    ockey

    ead

    and

    t

    he

    outh

    end

    f

    he

    each

    nd

    royne

    f50mong

    as

    onstructedn

    974

    athethernd.each

    lope

    nhallowegionshallowerhan

    -3m)

    isabout1/7 o1/10andabout1/30

    in

    thedeeperregion.

  • 8/11/2019 Beach Fill at Two Coasts of Different Configurations

    3/15

    1034

    COASTAL

    ENGINEERING-1986

    SetoInland

    Sea

    1983.12

    a)

    v 3k m

    SO '

    Y(

    25

  • 8/11/2019 Beach Fill at Two Coasts of Different Configurations

    4/15

    BEACH

    FILL

    AT

    TWOCOASTS

    1035

    Table1haracteristics

    of

    twobeaches

    Keino-Matsubara-Beach

    [ d . 5 0 ]

    native

    sand

    0.2mm 3mm

    borrow

    sand

    . 5 m m

    [Beachslope]

    shallowregion 1/7-1/10

    deepregion

    /3 0

    [waves]

    winter-spring

    pr ob ab i l i t y

    of

    appearance

    ofwaveshigherthan

    l m

    is3 5 . ( f r o m

    W-NW)

    summer autumnlarge

    part

    ofwavesare

    less

    than

    40cm

    Asakawa-

    Beach

    0 . 5 m m - 3 m m

    0.

    4m m

    and

    0 .

    8m m

    1/7-1/10

    1/30

    large

    partof

    wavesare

    less

    than40cm

    waveshigherthanl m

    incidents

    severalt i mes

    ayear

    in

    a

    typhoon

    seasons.(from

    SE-E)

    Table

    2

    rogress

    of

    beach

    fill

    andtopographicsurvey

    beach

    f i l l

    placement

    o

    a )

    PQ

    a

    D

    c t

    s

    5000m

    topographic

    survey

    1983.12.21

    1984.1.13

    1984.1.30

    1984.2.20

    1984.3.6

    1984.3.27

    1984.4.27

    1984.5.30

    -1984.10.18

    -1984.11.18

    -1984.12.1

    topographic

    beachfill^.urvey

    placement

    14180m

    o

    a )

    < U

    t 16845m

    v3

    C O

    M

    .

    it

    .,

    >:,}x

    J

    .

    xi

    r5x

    0.00

    0.00

    o.00

    ao.t

    HO.

    00

    SOT.00

    340.00 210.00 380.00 3*0.00 400.00

    440.00

    4(0.00

    T

    CM

    X

    wave

    reaking

    oint

    a)

    s

    i-

    ,

    t

    t

    ,

    f

    _

    ,

    ii

    8

    3

    >W

  • 8/11/2019 Beach Fill at Two Coasts of Different Configurations

    10/15

    BEACH

    FILL

    ATTWO

    COASTS

    1041

    22

    Southward

    Y j )

    1979

    Xshoreline

    Fig.8

    hange

    o f

    water

    depth

    tookplace

    during

    Sept.,1979and

    March,1980whenborrowsando f

    16845m

    wasplacedaround

    shoreline

    between

    surveying

    lines

    No.7andNo.15

    a t

    Asakawa-Beach

    22outhward

    (

    1980.3 980.9

    X

    shoreline

    Q

    vorthward

    X(m )

    0+

    l

    Fig.

    9hannge

    o f

    waterdepth

    took

    placeduring6-monthafter

    beach

    f i l l

    placement

    a t

    Asakawa-Beach

  • 8/11/2019 Beach Fill at Two Coasts of Different Configurations

    11/15

    1042

    COASTAL

    ENGINEERING-1986

    From

    hese twofigures,

    it

    is

    easily

    found

    that

    thereplenished

    borrow

    sand

    moved

    from

    the

    replenished

    region mainly toward both

    southward and

    northward

    along the shoreline. As is

    the

    case

    of

    K e

    ino-Matsubara-Beach,

    a

    few

    portion

    of

    borrow

    sand

    seemed

    to

    be

    transported

    in

    onshore

    and

    ffshore

    directions.

    Figures0

    nd

    1

    how

    ross-shore

    ndongshoreigen-

    functionsi(i,t)

    nd

    i(j,t)hich

    orrespond

    o

    he

    argest

    eigenvalues.

    X ( i )

    >f,-

    J

    3

    -

    '0

    * - > .

    -

    9J

    ,

    *J

    )

    Fig.10 C r o s s - s h o r eempi ric a l

    e i

    genfunctionc o r r e s p o n d i n g

    t o

    thelargeste i genvalue .

    10.0

    f

    l3

    *3

    **^?J.J.

    i9

    so.,

    e,,;i9t

    t

    ' ' ,

    20

    Y(j)

    **>l

    *, /J

    J

    .7

    Fig.

    11

    Lo n g s h o r eempi ric a l

    e i

    genfunctionc o r r e s p on d i n g

    to

    thelargeste i g e nva l u e

  • 8/11/2019 Beach Fill at Two Coasts of Different Configurations

    12/15

  • 8/11/2019 Beach Fill at Two Coasts of Different Configurations

    13/15

    1044

    COASTALENGINEERING-

    1986

    s

    /

    i

    i

    *xxxxxxxxietitfxiu*tx*r

    t

    x

    r

    >

    *'*

    K

    '?'l'f *

    . rf->

    [

    *'>fw*-x

    ,

    B)

    f>rir '

    Jt

    *

    Jt

    -

    t-

    S^\N _:tt'?:

    0.5~/s

    e-oo

    o.eo ac.co

    uo.co itc.oo

    JM.OQ 49.00

    stc.oo

    :;o.w

    Jtc.co

  • 8/11/2019 Beach Fill at Two Coasts of Different Configurations

    14/15

    BEACH

    FILLATTWO

    COASTS 1 0 4 5

    i V ( r a )

    3000

    2000

    1000

    0-8-16

    J-10-14

    100(t)

    6 0

    4 0

    2 0

    Fig.13 Remaining

    ratefborrowsandandvolumetric

    changeatKeino-Matsubara-Beach

    AV(m')

    4000

    3000

    2000

    1 0 0 0

    Volume

    of

    replenished

    borrowsand

    100(X)

    6 0

    2 0

    Fig.

    14

    Remaining

    rate

    f

    borrow

    sand

    and

    volumetric

    changeat

    Asakawa-Beach

  • 8/11/2019 Beach Fill at Two Coasts of Different Configurations

    15/15

    1046

    OASTAL

    ENGINEERING-1986

    Althoughorrowandf000m

    3

    as

    lacedehindhe

    ubmerged

    breakwater,he

    ncreasefheandolumeetweenheurveying

    lines

    o.8

    nd

    6

    as

    bout

    300m

    3

    .

    herefore,n

    healculation

    of

    tn)

    from

    q. 4),

    weused

    3300m

    3

    for Vb.

    It

    s

    ound

    rom

    his

    igure

    hat

    he

    and

    olume

    ust

    ehind

    the

    ubmerged

    reakwaterecreasedastndnly08 emainedwo

    month

    fter

    heeach

    ill

    lacement.n

    he

    ther

    and,

    ore

    han

    30

    f

    he

    orrowand

    emained

    etween

    he

    urveying

    ines

    o.8

    nd

    No.16.hiseanshatheigrationpeedforrowandsoto

    fastndnly0 forrowandovedfforehan0mromhe

    replenished

    region.

    Figure

    4howsheolumetrichanges

    nd

    emainingatef

    borrow

    and

    t

    sakawa-Beach.t

    his

    each,

    heolumef

    and

    n

    the

    hole

    each

    ncreased

    t

    very

    each

    ill

    lacement.

    owever,

    the

    emaining

    ate

    f

    he

    otal

    orrow

    and

    eplenished

    n

    he

    beach

    rom

    q. 4)

    ecreasesraduallyrom0 ndinallyeaches

    6 0 .hismplieshathere

    s

    ertainimito

    eep

    andithin

    aocketeach

    hich

    illeetermined

    y

    he

    eometrical

    roperty

    of thebeach,

    wave

    climate

    andso

    n.

    6.

    Conclusions

    Movementsf

    orrow

    and

    eplenished

    t

    ong

    traight

    each

    and

    ocket

    each

    hich

    as

    n

    rc-shoreline

    re

    nvestigated

    y

    analyzing

    he

    eriodically

    easured

    ottom

    opography

    fter

    he

    beach

    fillplacements.

    It

    s

    ound

    hat

    he

    mountforrow

    and

    oved

    n

    he

    longshore

    irection

    urpasseshe

    mount

    forrow

    andransported

    inhe

    ross-shore

    irectionegardless

    f

    hehapesf

    he

    shorelines.learorrelationslso

    ound

    etweenhe

    horeline

    displacementsandthechangesof

    sectional

    areas.

    References

    S a w a r a g i ,

    T. ,.

    eguchi

    nd

    .S.

    Lee

    (1985),A

    new

    modelfora

    p r e d i c t i o nof

    beach

    d e f o r m a t i o naroundarivermou t h,Proc.nt.

    Sympo.Ocean

    Space

    Utilization'85,

    2 ,

    pp.229-237.