before the public utilities commission of the … · 19.07.2018 · gives notice of the following...

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY’S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE

COMMUNICATIONS

BETH GAYLORD TAMMY JONES IAN MICHAEL FORREST

Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-6980 Facsimile: (626) 302-6634 E-mail: [email protected]

Dated: July 19, 2018

In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) for a Permit to Construct Electrical Facilities with Voltages between 50 kV and 200 kV; Valley-Ivyglen 115 kV Subtransmission Line Project.

A.07-01-031, et al. (Filed January 16, 2007)

And Related Matter.

A.07-04-028

In the Matter of the Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Alberhill System Project.

A.09-09-022 (Filed September 30, 2009)

1


STATE OF CALIFORNIA


COMMUNICATIONS

Pursuant to Rule 8.4(a) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the California Public

Utilities Commission (“Commission”), Southern California Edison Company (“SCE”) hereby

gives notice of the following notice of ex parte communication.

The communication occurred at the offices of the Commission located at 505 Van Ness

Avenue, San Francisco, California on Thursday, July 16, 2018 at 11:00 A.M. SCE initiated the

communication with David Peck, Energy Advisor to Commission President Michael Picker.

President Picker was not present during the communication. Attending the meeting on behalf of

SCE were Laura Genao, Managing Director of Regulatory Affairs, and Rosalie Barcinas,

Director of Regulatory Licensing.



And Related Matter.

A.07-04-028



2

The communication was oral and lasted approximately thirty (30) minutes. The attached

written materials were distributed during the meeting. The communication related to the above

referenced proceedings, the April 4, 2018 Proposed Decision of Administrative Law Judge

Yacknin, and the June 29, 2018 Alternate Proposed Decision of Commissioner Guzman Aceves

(“APD”).

Specifically, SCE used the attached materials and requested an alternate be issued

approving the Alberhill System Project (“Alberhill”). SCE restated the need for the Alberhill’s

approval now in order to timely provide additional capacity, diversify power sources to Valley

South’s large and geographically islanded system, and provide needed 115 kV tie lines. The

need for the Project, along with a robust alternative analysis, is well documented by the

administrative record. SCE asserted that the existing record supports the approval of both the

Valley-Ivyglen and Alberhill Projects. SCE also reiterated the need to move forward with the

Valley-Ivyglen Project as soon as possible.

[Continued in the next page]

3

SCE also asserted that alternatively, in recognition of the APD’s desire to have additional

information related to need and other alternatives not yet vetted in this proceeding, the Alberhill

proceeding should be kept open and that additional information be provided as part of the

Alberhill proceeding. To deny Alberhill, close the proceeding, and require a new application

will cause unnecessary additional delays putting the Valley South area and its customers at

continued and increased reliability risks.

Respectfully submitted, IAN FORREST

/s/ Ian Forrest By: Ian Forrest



July 19, 2018

Appendix A

Alberhill System Project & Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Project PowerPoint Presentation

(July 2018)

Alberhill System Project &Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Project

July 2018

• The need for the Alberhill System Project is now.

• SCE response to the Alternate Proposed Decision (June 29, 2018).

2

Overview

SCE seeks the most efficient path forward for the Alberhill System Project.

• Because the electrical demand served in the Valley South System is so large, a modest percentage of annual growth means significant increases in actual electrical demand.

• Peak demand is projected to exceed capacity in the Valley South System by 2021.

• The last two years the area has reached its all time peak demand highs and exceeded SCE’s forecasted amounts for those year respectively.1

• Valley South is effectively operating at “redline” (currently at 96.8% utilization in 1-in-5 year heat conditions).

• Continued risk of not being able to provide sufficient electrical capacity to more than 175,000 metered customers (approximately 500,000 people).

• As electrical demands continue to grow on the system, reliability and safety risks increase for both Valley North and Valley South Systems.

3

The Alberhill System Project is Needed Now

Reliability is at risk now; therefore, the Alberhill System Projects should be approvedwithout delay.

1On July 6, 2018, SCE recorded an unadjusted peak demand value of 995 MVA on a day that was within 1 degree of theaverage peak temperature. This is consistent with values recorded in 2017 and occurred at the beginning of the summerpeak season with over 2.5 months of summer remaining.

• SCE’s load forecast is consistent with typical industry accepted methods and predicts growth at 0.89 percent per year.

• Project objectives for the Alberhill System Project have always included both capacity and reliability needs.

• The Alberhill System Project is the only alternative identified in this proceeding that meets both the capacity and reliability needs of the unique Valley South System (e.g., location, size, current configuration, growth potential, and significant amount of load).

• A robust alternatives screening was completed as part of the EIR and the Alberhill System Project was determined to be the environmentally superior alternative.

4

Record Supports the Need for Alberhill System Project

Robust record supports the identified need; therefore, the Alberhill System Projectshould be approved.

• Following outright denial of the Alberhill System Project, the Alternate Proposed Decision directs SCE to supplement the existing statement of facts and reason.

• Requires a new application be filed.

• Will Result in additional costs and delays which cause increased risk to reliability in the area.• Final design, permitting, procurement and construction can take up

to four years to complete following licensing.

5

SCE’s Response to the Alternate Proposed Decision

The process outlined in the Alternate Proposed Decision will result in additionalcosts and delays.

• SCE maintains that the Alberhill System Project should be approved as proposed.

• Absent an approval, SCE seeks a procedural path forward that is as efficient as possible, recognizing the timing of the reliability needs of the area, as well as the data needs of the Commission.• Begin the process to supplement the record for the Alberhill System

Project immediately in order to avoid further delays.• Modify the Alternate Proposed Decision to:

• Approve the PTC for the Valley-Ivyglen Project; and

• Hold the proceeding open for the Alberhill System Project.

6

Suggested Procedural Path Forward

Absent approval of both the Valley Ivyglen and Alberhill System Projects, SCErequests that the Valley Ivyglen Project be approved and the proceeding be heldopen for the Alberhill System Project.

• Commission should approve the Valley-Ivyglen and Alberhill System Projects.

• Alternatively, Commission should approve the Valley-Ivyglen Project and hold the proceeding open for the Alberhill System Project.

• SCE will provide specific edits to the Alternate Proposed Decision in their comments to be submitted on July 19th.

7

Next Steps

BACK UP

8

• Peak demand is projected toexceed capacity in theValley South System by 2021(currently at 96.8%utilization in 1 in 5 yearheat conditions).

• There are no opportunitiesto transfer load due togeography and incompatibleadjacent system voltages.

• The Alberhill System Projectwould initially transferapproximately 400 MVAfrom the Valley SouthSystem (reducing itsutilization to 65%).

Capacity

4

Mira Loma 66 kV

Vista 115 kV

Valley South 115 kV

Valley North 115 kV

90 100%

80 89%

70 79%

60 69%

50 59%

40 49%

30 39%

SDG&E

Alberhill 115 kV

SDG&E

Mira Loma 66 kV

Valley North 115 kV

Valley South 115 kV

Vista 115 kV

Existing

Percentutilizationof installedcapacity

Proposed

Reliability• Reliability has been a focus throughout this proceeding.

• CPUC Project Objectives in EIR, Applicant’s Stated Objectives in EIR, Testimony from SCE and other parties; SCE briefs, PD comments, and oral arguments.

• Valley South is a large, isolated system operating without connections to other systems.• This leaves the 600 square miles served by the Valley South System vulnerable to electrical

outages during emergency conditions that typically would be addressed through use of system tie-lines.

• A significant amount of load is concentrated into one substation site.• Limiting the capacity amount at any one site and diversifying the locations of that capacity

improve electrical service reliability by increasing the resiliency of the system to withstand emergency conditions.

• Valley South is effectively operating at “redline” and SCE forecasts further growth.• Operating electrical facilities at maximum operating limits reduces the planned lifespan of the

assets and may result in equipment failures, safety concerns, and/or service outages.

10

Splitting the Valley South load between two substations and creating tie lines is criticalto creating a strong network to deliver reliable electrical service.

Appendix B

SCE’s July 2, 2018 Notice of Ex Parte Communication incl.

Alberhill System Project & Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Project PowerPoint Presentation (June 2018)


STATE OF CALIFORNIA


COMMUNICATION

BETH GAYLORD TAMMY JONES IAN MICHAEL FORREST



Dated: July 2, 2018



And Related Matter.

A.07-04-028



B-1

1


STATE OF CALIFORNIA


COMMUNICATION

Pursuant to Rule 8.4(a) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the California Public

Utilities Commission (Commission), Southern California Edison Company (SCE) hereby gives

notice of the following notice of ex parte communication.

The communication occurred at the offices of the Commission located at 505 Van Ness

Avenue, San Francisco, California on Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 2:30 P.M. SCE initiated the

communication with Ehren Seybert, Energy Advisor to Commissioner Carla J. Peterman.

Commissioner Peterman was not present during the communication. Attending the meeting on

behalf of SCE were Phil Herrington, Senior Vice President of Transmission and Distribution,



And Related Matter.

A.07-04-028



B-2

2

Laura Genao, Managing Director of Regulatory Affairs, and Rosalie Barcinas, Director of

Regulatory Licensing.

The communication was oral and lasted approximately twenty (20) minutes. The

attached written materials were distributed during each meeting.

The communication related to the above referenced proceedings and the April 4, 2018

Proposed Decision of Administrative Law Judge Yacknin. Specifically, SCE used the attached

materials and requested an alternate be issued approving the Alberhill System Project.

SCE described the unique size and location of the Valley South area and noted how load

growth, while modest, still warrants approval of the proposed Alberhill System Project in order

to have it in place before reliability issues become significant. SCE also addressed how the

Alberhill System Project is proposed to be sited in an area of SCE’s service territory which is

more vulnerable to reliability issues in light of its geographic and electrical isolation.

As described in the attached presentation, SCE also addressed various allegations made

by various intervenors in recent ex parte meetings. SCE emphasized how the intervenors’

statements were misinformed or inaccurate.

Lastly, SCE discussed various stakeholder meetings that have occurred during the course

of these proceedings and described the evolving nature of communities’ varying requests for

undergrounding of the Valley-Ivyglen Project.

Respectfully submitted, IAN FORREST

/s/ Ian Forrest By: Ian Forrest



July 2, 2018

B-3

Appendix A

Alberhill System Project & Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Project PowerPoint Presentation

(June 2018)

B-4

Alberhill System Project &Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Project

June 2018

A-1 B-5

• Intervenors have made multiple assertions that are either misinformed or completely inaccurate; SCE seeks to correct these misstatements.

• The Alberhill System Project is the only alternative identified in this proceeding that meets both the capacity and reliability needs.

• Robust stakeholder engagement has occurred throughout both the Valley-Ivyglen and Alberhill System Project proceedings.

• Requests for undergrounding have evolved over time.

2

Overview

A-2 B-6

Intervenors Assert Inaccurate Information

Assertion: Growth projections are negative or flat according to CAISO and the CEC.

• SCE Position: CAISO and the CEC perform planning and forecasting activities at the SCE system-wide level and neither are (nor intended to be) representative of those required to assess and meet the needs of local areas.

• Because the electrical demand served in the Valley South System is so large, even when growth is conservatively forecast at 0.89 percent per year, potential load demands on the Valley South System are expected to surpass existing capacity as early as three years from now.

Assertion: SCE’s stated peak load value on Aug 28, 2017 is extrapolated and never occurred.

• SCE Position: The value on Aug 28th was identified as requiring adjustment due to abnormal weather and system conditions to reflect what would have been expected otherwise.

• This value was provided to illustrate that loading values in the Valley South System have, and do, exceed those forecast values interveners obtained from the CAISO. Aug 28th notwithstanding, SCE recorded unadjusted peak demand values on Aug 29th and Aug 30th of 991 MVA and 1,008 MVA respectively. Both being higher (by nearly 5%) than the approximate 950 MVA value referenced by the interveners and for which they claim will be the maximum peak demand for the next 10 years.

3

A-3 B-7

Intervenors Assert Inaccurate Information, continued

Assertion: In the event of a complete loss of power at Valley Substation, the Alberhill substation and tie-lines can only provide for a portion of the load and therefore do not provide the reliability benefits that SCE claims.

• SCE Position: SCE planning guidelines do not require 100% coverage in the case of a complete loss of power to a substation.

• The Alberhill Project would serve the initial load to be transferred upon project completion (400 MVA) and additional load through construction of tie-lines (175 MVA), totaling 575 MVA or 250,000 people that would otherwise lose service (approx. 50% of the existing Valley South System load).

Assertion: There are other options, such as adding a transformer at Valley Substation or creating tie-lines to the Valley North System, that can resolve reliability needs and are less expensive.

• SCE Position: Other presented options do not comprehensively address both of the Project’s capacity and reliability needs identified throughout this proceeding.

• The Alberhill System Project addresses capacity needs by adding transformer capacity and addressing reliability needs by diversifying the Valley South load and creating tie-lines between Alberhill and Valley South.

4

A-4 B-8

Other AlternativesA robust alternatives screening was completed as part of the FEIR (Appendix D).

• 27 alternatives were eliminated because they were unable to meet most of the project’s objectives, infeasible, or would not avoid or substantially lessen a potentially significant effect.

Overview of alternatives recently discussed at oral arguments:

• Tie-lines alone:• Does not resolve capacity concerns as tie-lines do not provide capacity, rather transfer capability during

outages.• Does not diversify capacity leaving it geographically concentrated at a single substation.• Scope would potentially include construction of 115 kV lines (expected to be 15 miles in length or more).

• Shift load (Valley South to Valley North) alone:• Shifts the burden to another system advancing the need for a project similar to Alberhill in the Valley North

System.• Does not diversify the capacity leaving it geographically concentrated at a single substation.

• Energy storage alone:• This was not an alternative specifically reviewed in the record or as part of this proceeding and it is unclear what

the scope or feasibility of this alternative would be.• At a very minimum, energy storage alone would not create tie-lines or effectively split the system load and thus

will not satisfy identified reliability needs.

5

The Alberhill System Project is the only alternative that meets both capacity and reliability needs and was determined to be environmentally superior.

A-5 B-9

• Lake Elsinore

• Riverside County Supervisor

• Riverside County Planning and Transportation Departments

• Temescal Valley Municipal Advisory Council (MAC)

• City of Wildomar

• City of Menifee

• City of Perris

• Building Industry Association

• Terramoor Housing Development

• Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians

6

Stakeholder Outreach

Robust stakeholder engagement has occurred as part of the Valley-Ivyglen and Alberhill System Project proceedings.

A-6 B-10

Valley-Ivyglen Project outreach started in 2006; Alberhill Project outreach started in 2010

• Mailings

• Scoping Meetings (two in 2015 and two in 2016)

• Open Houses (two: 2006 and 2009)

• Pre-application requests for position statement on project (five jurisdictions in 2009)

• Post-application presentation (Lake Elsinore)

• Post-DEIR meetings (approx. 18 – 20)

• Project briefings (Wildomar City Council; Riverside County Supervisor; Elsinore Unified School District; Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District; Temescal Valley Municipal Advisory Commission)

• Post-FEIR meetings (approx. 7 – 10)

• Post-FEIR project tour (Lake Elsinore)• Undergrounding in specific locations for the Valley-Ivyglen Project discussed (2017).

• City Council Meeting (Lake Elsinore)• Lake Elsinore claims FEIR flawed and their desire to develop new citywide underground ordinance (2017).

7

Outreach Examples

Engagement with stakeholders has been ongoing since 2006. Specific proposals for undergrounding have been raised in the past year.

A-7 B-11

• The Proposed Decision confirmed that the Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Line Project would not have a significant environmental impact on aesthetics.

• Requests for undergrounding have evolved throughout this proceeding:• Post-application presentation – No major concerns expressed. (2009)

• Draft EIR comments – Rather than propose an all or (almost) nothing approach to undergrounding… the DEIR should propose a thoughtful underground alternative… providing undergrounding in urban areas in which aesthetic impacts are heightened. (2016)

• Testimony – Cannot overstate the importance of the lack of transmission line undergrounding, particularly in developed areas where all utilities have been mandated to be undergrounded. (2017)

• Ex parte – Undergrounding recommended on Pasadena Street, Baker Street, Nicholas Road and Lake Street in Lake Elsinore (emphasis on Pasadena, Nicholas and Lake, in that order of priority). (2018)

8

Valley-Ivyglen Undergrounding Requests

The Proposed Decision appropriately grants the petition to modify the PTC for the Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Line Project.

A-8 B-12

9

Valley-Ivyglen and Alberhill System Project Area

A-9 B-13

Conclusions• The Alberhill System Project is the only alternative identified in this proceeding

that meets both the capacity and reliability needs of the unique Valley South System (e.g., location, size, current configuration, growth potential, and significant amount of load).

• SCE conducted robust outreach with stakeholders as part of this proceeding and addressed issues as they were raised.

• The CPUC should support the petition to modify the PTC for the Valley-Ivyglen Subtransmission Line Project.

• The CPUC should approve the Alberhill System Project.

10

A-10 B-14

Back Up

11

A-11 B-15

12

Without the Alberhill System Project, in the case of a significant system event at Valley Substation (substation outage), less than 15% of load is able to remain served.

Emergency Conditions- Load Transfer Capability (existing)

A-12 B-16

13

Emergency Conditions- Load Transfer Capability (proposed)

With the Alberhill System Project, in the case of a significant system event at Valley Substation (substation outage), more than 40% of load is able to remain served.

Intervenors Assert Inaccurate Information*Intervenor’s representation of load transfer capabilities ignores the 400 MVA that would initially be transferred.

*Intervenor’s reference to the Vista System’s transfer capability as being only 115 MVA is not accurate; 250 MVA represents the Vista System’s transformers capacity while the 115 MVA value references only the current tie-line capacity.

A-13 B-17


STATE OF CALIFORNIA


A.07-01-031, et al.

(Filed January 16, 2007)

And Related Matter.

A.07-04-028


A.09-09-022

(Filed September 30, 2009)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, I have this day served a true copy of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATION on all parties identified on the attached service list(s) A.07-01-031, et al. Service was effected by transmitting the copies via e-mail to all parties who have provided an e-mail address, including the e-mail addresses listed below,

[email protected] [email protected]

and by placing the copies in sealed envelopes and causing such envelopes to be delivered by U.S. Mail to the offices of the Assigned ALJ(s) or other addressee(s).

ALJ Hallie Yacknin CPUC 505 Van Ness Ave., Room 5108 San Francisco, CA 94102-3214

Executed on July 2, 2018, at Rosemead, California.

/s/ Angelica Gamboa Angelica Gamboa, Legal Administrative Assistant SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770

B-18

CPUC Home

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIONService Lists

PROCEEDING: A0701031 - EDISON - TO CONSTRUC FILER: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338 E) LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: JUNE 29, 2018

Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files

Back to Service Lists Index

Parties

TAMMY JONES JOHN V. GIARDINELLI SR. ATTORNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY THE GIARDINELLI LAW GROUP 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE./ PO BOX 800 31594 RAILROAD CANYON ROAD ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 CANYON LAKE, CA 92587 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR: CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA, INC.; CASTLE & COOKE ALBERHILL RANCH, LLC

DAVID H. MANN JACQUELINE AYER ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 2010 WEST AVENUE K, SUITE 701 LEIBOLD MCCLENDON & MANN, P.C. LANCASTER, CA 93536 9841 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE, STE.230 FOR: FOREST RESIDENTS OPPOSING NEW IRVINE, CA 92618 TRANSMISSION LINES (FRONTLINES) FOR: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE

CLEVELAND LEE MARION PELEO CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LEGAL DIVISION LEGAL DIVISION ROOM 5122 ROOM 4107 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 FOR: ORA (FORMERLY DRA) FOR: ORA

JOSEPH P. COMO DAVID KATES ATTORNEY DAVID MARK & COMPANY LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH COMO 3510 UNOCAL PLACE, SUITE 200 2340 WARD ST. STE 105 SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 BERKELEY, CA 94705 FOR: THE NEVADA HYDRO COMPANY

Page 1 of 5CPUC - Service Lists - A0701031

7/2/2018https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/servicelists/A0701031_75306.htmB-19

FOR: TURN

Information Only

CLARE LAUFENBER GALLARDO KEITH WHITE STRATEGIC TRANSMISSION INVESTMNT PROGRAM KD WHITE CONSULTING CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

KEN EOH KAZEM ELSHAFIE PACIFIC GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT 8051 MAIN STREET 500 SHATTO PLACE NO 320 STANTON, CA 90680 LOS ANGELES, CA 90020

CASE ADMINISTRATION CASE ADMINISTRATION LAW DEPARTMENT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 8631 RUSH STREET 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE., PO BOX 800 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770

IAN FORREST DONALD C. LIDDELL SR. ATTORNEY ATTORNEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY DOUGLASS & LIDDELL 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE. / PO BOX 800 2928 2ND AVENUE ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 SAN DIEGO, CA 92103

JOHN W. LESLIE, ESQ SHIVANI SIDHAR ATTORNEY REGULATORY CASE MGR. DENTONS US LLP SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP32F EMAIL ONLY, CA 92121 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123

TIM LYONS EVELYN F. HEIDELBERG REGULATORY AFFAIRS CROSBIE GLINER SCHIFFMAN SOUTHARD... SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 12750 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, SUITE 250 8330 CENTURY PARK CT, C32F SAN DIEGO, CA 92130 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1530

GENE FRICK TONYA PACE 4271 BAGGETT DR HOGLE-IRELAND INC. RIVERSIDE, CA 92505 1500 IOWA AVE. STE 110 RIVERSIDE, CA 92507 FOR: HOGLE-IRELAND INC.

E.J. SINGELYN GABRIEL COUTINO PO BOX 489 28102 STONEHOUSE RD. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 FOR: EDWARD SINGELYN

GRANT TAYLOR KEN NIEMI CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 17032 MCBRIDE



130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530

LINDA RIDENOUR MIKE PALMER 33628 BRAND AVE 33281 ORTEGA HIGHWAY LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530

MODESTO MARTINEZ CALLISTA PURNELL 28100 STONE HOUSE ROAD 28480 REDGUM DR. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

CARMEN M. DA COSTA TARR ELIZABETH HENSON 28164 STONEHOUSE RD. 28211 LEONA DR. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

JAMES KOSKI JOHN COSTA 18711 TERETICORNIS AVE. 28131 LEONA DRIVE LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

JOHN EARL THOMPSON JOSE R. MARTINEZ 28546 HAYGOOD WAY 18553 MERMACK AVE. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

MARY-RITA- APPLEMAN-THOMPSON MICHAEL MCDONALD 28546 HAYGOOD WAY 28162 STONEHOUSE RD. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 FOR: MARY-RITA APPLEMAN-THOMPSON

MIKE MATTHEWS PAUL G. TARR 29026 ALLAN STREET 28164 STONEHOUSE RD. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

PEDRO MARTINEZ ROMAIN DIAZ 28277 ROSTRATA 28375 ROSTRATA AVE LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

STEPHANIE MC NEAL SUSEN LENCON 28310 VIA DOROTHEA 18600 MERMACK RD. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

TARRY MC NEAL TERRENCE PURNELL 28310 VIA DOROTHEA 18450 PURNELL RD. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

TERRENCE SMITH VICEN TEARECHIGA 28281 ROSTRATA 28100 STONEHOUSE LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 FOR: TERRENCE THOMAS SMITH

VIRGINIA SAIRDREZ NORMAN D. GRITTON



28195 LEONAST 27245 HWY. 74 LAKE ENSINORE, CA 92532 PERRIS, CA 92570

AARON CLAVERIE JEREMY GOLDMAN THE CALIFORNIAN REGION MGR. - LAKE ELSINORE 28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE, SUITE 100 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TEMECULA, CA 92590 24487 PRIELIPP DR. WILDOMAR, CA 92595

LOUIS BARRON DAVIS MARC T. CAMPOPIANO REGION MGR. - RIVERSIDE COUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS LLP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, 20TH FLOOR 24487 PRIELIPP DR. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 WILDOMAR, CA 92595

JOHN E. YOUNG ROBERT PECOY SYCAMORE CREEK MARKETPLACE, LLC AALBERHILL PARTNERS LLC 5190 CAMPUS DRIVE 4887 EAST LA PALMA AVE. STE 706 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-2101 ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92807 FOR: AALBERHILL PARTNERS LLC

JOSEPH AMICI HAYLEY GOODSON 25006 PINE CREEK LOOP STAFF ATTORNEY CORONA, CA 92883 THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK 785 MARKET ST., STE. 1400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 FOR: TURN

ALEXEY ORKIN BARRY R. FLYNN CONSULTANT FLYNN RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, INC. FLYNN RESOURCE CONSULTANTS INC. 5440 EDGEVIEW DRIVE 5440 EDGEVIEW DRIVE DISCOVERY BAY, CA 94505 DISCOVERY BAY, CA 94505

PUSHKAR G. WAGLE HENRY W. PIELAGE, P.E. SENIOR CONSULTANT RATEPAYER ADVOCATE FLYNN RESOURCE CONSULTANTS INC. 2860 GLEN CANYON ROAD 5440 EDGEVIEW DRIVE SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060 DISCOVERY BAY, CA 94505

DAVID PEFFER SCOTT BLAISING BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. ATTORNEY 915 L STREET, SUITE 1480 BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 915 L STREET, STE. 1480 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 FOR: CITY OF CORONA (CORONA)

State Service

CONNIE CHEN MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER GUZMAN ACEVES DRA CPUC - EXEC. DIV. EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY



EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

CHLOE LUKINS EHREN SEYBERT CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH COMMISSIONER PETERMAN ROOM 4102 ROOM 5303 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

HALLIE YACKNIN JOSEPH A. ABHULIMEN CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH ROOM 5108 ROOM 4209 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

MARCELO POIRIER NILS STANNIK CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LEGAL DIVISION ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH ROOM 5029 AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

SCOTT LOGAN TIM G. DREW CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ENERGY COST OF SERVICE & NATURAL GAS BRA ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH ROOM 4108 AREA 4-A 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

XIAO SELENA HUANG CLARE LAUFENBERG CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION 1516 NINTH STREET, MS 46 ROOM 3-D SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

TOP OF PAGE BACK TO INDEX OF SERVICE LISTS




STATE OF CALIFORNIA


A.07-01-031, et al.

(Filed January 16, 2007)

And Related Matter.

A.07-04-028


A.09-09-022

(Filed September 30, 2009)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, I have this day served a true copy of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S (U 338-E) NOTICE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS on all parties identified on the attached service list(s) A.07-01-031, et al. Service was effected by transmitting the copies via e-mail to all parties who have provided an e-mail address, including the e-mail addresses listed below,

[email protected] [email protected]

and by placing the copies in sealed envelopes and causing such envelopes to be delivered by U.S. Mail to the offices of the Assigned ALJ(s) or other addressee(s).

ALJ Hallie Yacknin CPUC-Division of ALJs 505 Van Ness Ave., Room 5108 San Francisco, CA 94102-3214

Executed on July 19, 2018, at Rosemead, California.

/s/ Angelica Gamboa Angelica Gamboa, Legal Administrative Assistant SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770

CPUC Home

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIONService Lists

PROCEEDING: A0701031 - EDISON - TO CONSTRUC FILER: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338 E) LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: JUNE 29, 2018

Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files

Back to Service Lists Index

Parties

TAMMY JONES JOHN V. GIARDINELLI SR. ATTORNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY THE GIARDINELLI LAW GROUP 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE./ PO BOX 800 31594 RAILROAD CANYON ROAD ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 CANYON LAKE, CA 92587 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR: CASTLE & COOKE CALIFORNIA, INC.; CASTLE & COOKE ALBERHILL RANCH, LLC

DAVID H. MANN JACQUELINE AYER ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 2010 WEST AVENUE K, SUITE 701 LEIBOLD MCCLENDON & MANN, P.C. LANCASTER, CA 93536 9841 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE, STE.230 FOR: FOREST RESIDENTS OPPOSING NEW IRVINE, CA 92618 TRANSMISSION LINES (FRONTLINES) FOR: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE

CLEVELAND LEE MARION PELEO CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LEGAL DIVISION LEGAL DIVISION ROOM 5122 ROOM 4107 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 FOR: ORA (FORMERLY DRA) FOR: ORA

JOSEPH P. COMO DAVID KATES ATTORNEY DAVID MARK & COMPANY LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH COMO 3510 UNOCAL PLACE, SUITE 200 2340 WARD ST. STE 105 SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 BERKELEY, CA 94705 FOR: THE NEVADA HYDRO COMPANY


7/19/2018https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/servicelists/A0701031_75306.htm

FOR: TURN

Information Only

CLARE LAUFENBER GALLARDO KEITH WHITE STRATEGIC TRANSMISSION INVESTMNT PROGRAM KD WHITE CONSULTING CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

KEN EOH KAZEM ELSHAFIE PACIFIC GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT 8051 MAIN STREET 500 SHATTO PLACE NO 320 STANTON, CA 90680 LOS ANGELES, CA 90020

CASE ADMINISTRATION CASE ADMINISTRATION LAW DEPARTMENT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 8631 RUSH STREET 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE., PO BOX 800 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770

IAN FORREST DONALD C. LIDDELL SR. ATTORNEY ATTORNEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY DOUGLASS & LIDDELL 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE. / PO BOX 800 2928 2ND AVENUE ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 SAN DIEGO, CA 92103

JOHN W. LESLIE, ESQ SHIVANI SIDHAR ATTORNEY REGULATORY CASE MGR. DENTONS US LLP SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP32F EMAIL ONLY, CA 92121 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123

TIM LYONS EVELYN F. HEIDELBERG REGULATORY AFFAIRS CROSBIE GLINER SCHIFFMAN SOUTHARD... SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 12750 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, SUITE 250 8330 CENTURY PARK CT, C32F SAN DIEGO, CA 92130 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1530

GENE FRICK TONYA PACE 4271 BAGGETT DR HOGLE-IRELAND INC. RIVERSIDE, CA 92505 1500 IOWA AVE. STE 110 RIVERSIDE, CA 92507 FOR: HOGLE-IRELAND INC.

E.J. SINGELYN GABRIEL COUTINO PO BOX 489 28102 STONEHOUSE RD. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 FOR: EDWARD SINGELYN

GRANT TAYLOR KEN NIEMI CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 17032 MCBRIDE



130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530

LINDA RIDENOUR MIKE PALMER 33628 BRAND AVE 33281 ORTEGA HIGHWAY LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530

MODESTO MARTINEZ CALLISTA PURNELL 28100 STONE HOUSE ROAD 28480 REDGUM DR. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

CARMEN M. DA COSTA TARR ELIZABETH HENSON 28164 STONEHOUSE RD. 28211 LEONA DR. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

JAMES KOSKI JOHN COSTA 18711 TERETICORNIS AVE. 28131 LEONA DRIVE LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

JOHN EARL THOMPSON JOSE R. MARTINEZ 28546 HAYGOOD WAY 18553 MERMACK AVE. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

MARY-RITA- APPLEMAN-THOMPSON MICHAEL MCDONALD 28546 HAYGOOD WAY 28162 STONEHOUSE RD. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 FOR: MARY-RITA APPLEMAN-THOMPSON

MIKE MATTHEWS PAUL G. TARR 29026 ALLAN STREET 28164 STONEHOUSE RD. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

PEDRO MARTINEZ ROMAIN DIAZ 28277 ROSTRATA 28375 ROSTRATA AVE LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

STEPHANIE MC NEAL SUSEN LENCON 28310 VIA DOROTHEA 18600 MERMACK RD. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

TARRY MC NEAL TERRENCE PURNELL 28310 VIA DOROTHEA 18450 PURNELL RD. LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532

TERRENCE SMITH VICEN TEARECHIGA 28281 ROSTRATA 28100 STONEHOUSE LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532 FOR: TERRENCE THOMAS SMITH

VIRGINIA SAIRDREZ NORMAN D. GRITTON



28195 LEONAST 27245 HWY. 74 LAKE ENSINORE, CA 92532 PERRIS, CA 92570

AARON CLAVERIE JEREMY GOLDMAN THE CALIFORNIAN REGION MGR. - LAKE ELSINORE 28765 SINGLE OAK DRIVE, SUITE 100 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TEMECULA, CA 92590 24487 PRIELIPP DR. WILDOMAR, CA 92595

LOUIS BARRON DAVIS MARC T. CAMPOPIANO REGION MGR. - RIVERSIDE COUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS LLP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, 20TH FLOOR 24487 PRIELIPP DR. COSTA MESA, CA 92626 WILDOMAR, CA 92595

JOHN E. YOUNG ROBERT PECOY SYCAMORE CREEK MARKETPLACE, LLC AALBERHILL PARTNERS LLC 5190 CAMPUS DRIVE 4887 EAST LA PALMA AVE. STE 706 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-2101 ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92807 FOR: AALBERHILL PARTNERS LLC

JOSEPH AMICI HAYLEY GOODSON 25006 PINE CREEK LOOP STAFF ATTORNEY CORONA, CA 92883 THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK 785 MARKET ST., STE. 1400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 FOR: TURN

ALEXEY ORKIN BARRY R. FLYNN CONSULTANT FLYNN RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, INC. FLYNN RESOURCE CONSULTANTS INC. 5440 EDGEVIEW DRIVE 5440 EDGEVIEW DRIVE DISCOVERY BAY, CA 94505 DISCOVERY BAY, CA 94505

PUSHKAR G. WAGLE HENRY W. PIELAGE, P.E. SENIOR CONSULTANT RATEPAYER ADVOCATE FLYNN RESOURCE CONSULTANTS INC. 2860 GLEN CANYON ROAD 5440 EDGEVIEW DRIVE SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060 DISCOVERY BAY, CA 94505

DAVID PEFFER SCOTT BLAISING BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. ATTORNEY 915 L STREET, SUITE 1480 BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 915 L STREET, STE. 1480 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 FOR: CITY OF CORONA (CORONA)

State Service

CONNIE CHEN MARTHA GUZMAN ACEVES CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER GUZMAN ACEVES DRA CPUC - EXEC. DIV. EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY



EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

CHLOE LUKINS EHREN SEYBERT CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH COMMISSIONER PETERMAN ROOM 4102 ROOM 5303 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

HALLIE YACKNIN JOSEPH A. ABHULIMEN CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH ROOM 5108 ROOM 4209 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

MARCELO POIRIER NILS STANNIK CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LEGAL DIVISION ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH ROOM 5029 AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

SCOTT LOGAN TIM G. DREW CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ENERGY COST OF SERVICE & NATURAL GAS BRA ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH ROOM 4108 AREA 4-A 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

XIAO SELENA HUANG CLARE LAUFENBERG CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION 1516 NINTH STREET, MS 46 ROOM 3-D SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

TOP OF PAGE BACK TO INDEX OF SERVICE LISTS



before the public utilities commission of the … · 19.07.2018 · gives notice of the following...

Documents