behavioral economics and economic policy robert h. frank cornell university

80
Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University Johnson Graduate School of Management

Upload: dorian-chan

Post on 01-Jan-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University Johnson Graduate School of Management. Adam Smith’s invisible hand: Self-interested demands will result in a socially efficient allocation. Why do markets often fail?. Which world would you choose?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy

Robert H. FrankCornell University

Johnson Graduate School of Management

Page 2: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Adam Smith’s invisible hand:

Self-interested demands will result in a socially efficient allocation.

Page 3: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Why do markets often fail?

Page 4: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

World B: You and your family live in a neighborhoods with 3000-square-foot houses, others in neighborhoods with 2000-square-foot houses.

Which world would you choose?

World A: You and your family live in a neighborhood with 4000-square-foot houses, others in neighborhoods with 6000-square-foot houses.

Page 5: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Which world would you choose?

A: You have 4 weeks of vacation each year, others have 6 weeks?

or

B: You have 2 weeks of vacation each year, others have 1 week?

Page 6: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Housing = positional good

Leisure = nonpositional good

Page 7: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

1.People care about relative consumption, more in some domains than in others.

2. Such concerns lead to positional arms races--expenditure arms races focused on positional goods.

3. These arms races divert resources from nonpositional goods, causing large welfare losses.

4. The welfare losses have been made worse by rising income inequality.

Page 8: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

The Conflict Between Individual and Group

Robert H. Frank. “The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods.” American Economic Review, 75, March, 1985, pp. 101-116.

Page 9: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 10: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 11: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 12: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Charles Darwin: Traits are selected because of their impact on the reproductive fitness of individuals, not groups.

Traits that benefit individuals often work to the disadvantage of groups.

Page 13: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Big antlers: Smart for one, dumb for all.

Page 14: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 15: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Happiness and Income (Easterlin,1974)

1. Happiness levels within a country tend to be highly stable over time, even in the face of significant economic growth.

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |196 1 196 3 196 5 1 967 1 969 1 971 1 973 1 975 1 977 1 979 1 981 1 983 19 85 19 87

10

8

6

4

2

0

Happiness

500

400

300

200

100

0

Average reported levelof well-being in surveys(10 = extremely happy)

Income

Index of Japanese GNP,

per capita (1960 = 100)

Veenhoven, 1993

Page 16: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

2. Happiness within countries at any moment of time depends on income.

Income vs Satisfaction in the US, 1981-4. Source: Diener, Sandvik, and Seidlitz, 1993.

Page 17: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Which vertical line is longer?

Page 18: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Is my house OK?

Page 19: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 20: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Theoretical Considerations

People should care about relative position because it affects material payoffs

– Food in Famines

– Mate access

Page 21: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Are concerns about relative position hard-wired?

Page 22: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 23: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Neurophysiological Evidence

• Local rank vs serotonin

Page 24: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Local rank vs testosterone

Page 25: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Sister B(not employed)

Sister A

Probability that Sister A is employed is 16-25% higher when Sister B’s husband earns more than Sister A’s husband.

Source: Neumark and Postlewaite, 2000

Page 26: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

In a poor country, a man proves to his wife that he loves her by giving her a rose. In a rich country he must give a dozen roses.

Richard Layard

Page 27: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

The middle class family’s condition has grown more difficult because of sharply rising inequality of income and wealth.

Page 28: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Fractal earnings change pattern for virtually every labor market group:

Bottom quintile: Absolute earnings decline

Middle quintile: Negligible earnings growth

Top quintile: Substantial growth

Page 29: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

College graduates

Dentists

The top 1 percent

The top 1/10th of 1 percent…

Page 30: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

2000: 531 x average worker’s earnings

Earnings of CEOs of largest U.S. corporations

1980: 42 x average worker’s earnings

Page 31: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Why increased inequality?

Changes in the distribution of human capital?

Technical change favoring most educated workers?

Foreign competition at the low end?

Page 32: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Winner-Take-All Markets

Markets in which reward depends not just on absolute performance but also on relative performance.

Page 33: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Why did Steffi Graf earn twice as much in 1994 as in 1993?

Page 34: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

The market for university presidents

Bottom-line difference: (0.03)x($4 billion) = $120 million

Suppose Cornell’s Skorton was 3% better at fundraising than the 2nd-best candidate.

Page 35: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Because of increased inequality, it now costs a middle-class family much more than before to achieve many important goals.

Not all costs of inequality are psychological.

Page 36: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

If you were society’s median earner, which option would you prefer?

1) You save enough to support a comfortable standard of living in retirement, but your children attend a school whose students score in the 20th percentile on standardized tests in reading and math; or

2) you save too little to support a comfortable standard of living in retirement, but your children attend a school whose students score in the 50th percentile on those tests?

Page 37: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

The cost of sending a child to a school of average quality is linked to the price of the average house in the community.

Median size of a newly constructed house:

1980: less than 1600 square feet

2007: more than 2300 square feet

Page 38: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Expenditure Cascades

• Top earners spend more because they have more money.

• And so on all the way down the income ladder.

• That, in turn, shifts the frame of reference for those next below.

• This shifts frame of reference for those just below them, who also spend more.

Page 39: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

$10 million birthday parties

Aerosmith50 Cent

Page 40: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 41: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Viking Professional, $5,000.

1989 Sunbeam, $90

Gas Grills Then and Now

Page 42: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Talos Outdoor Cooking Suite, $35,000.

Page 43: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Victoria’s Secret $12.5 Million Fantasy Bra

Page 44: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

US Personal Savings Rate

Page 45: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Evidence for Expenditure Cascade Hypothesis

Large U.S. counties with higher growth in 90/50 ratios* had higher growth in

Commute times

Divorce rates

Bankruptcy rates

In OECD, over time and across countries, higher 90/50 ratios are linked with longer hours of work***Frank, Levine, and Ostvik-White, 2004**Bowles and Park, 2003

Page 46: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Remedies for Market Failure

Page 47: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Why do hockey players vote in secret ballots for helmet rules, even though they choose not to wear helmets when there is no rule?

Page 48: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

If you were society’s median earner, which option would you prefer?

A. You work in a safe job, but your children attend a school whose students score in the 20th percentile on standardized tests in reading and math; or

B. You earn a higher salary by accepting a more dangerous job, but your children attend a school whose students score in the 50th percentile on those tests?

Page 49: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Proposed positional arms control agreement:

Impose limits on workplace safety risks.

Page 50: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Public Waste vs. Private Waste

Page 51: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Loose Nukes: Not worth locking down?

Page 52: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Private waste occurs not because consumers get overcharged, but because they get caught up in wasteful “positional arms races.”

Page 53: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 54: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

The Progressive Consumption Tax(a.k.a., the Unlimited Savings Allowance Tax)

Consumption + Savings = Income

Consumption = Income – Savings

Taxable consumption = Income – Savings – standard deduction

Page 55: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

The Jones Family

Annual income: $50,000

Annual savings: $5,000

Standard deduction: $30,000

Taxable consumption: $50,000 - $30,000 - $5,000 = $15,000

Tax rate = 20 percent

Annual tax bill = $3,000

(About the same as under the current income tax.)

Page 56: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Big mansions: Smart for one, dumb for all?

Page 57: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Is redistributive taxation “legitimate”?

Page 58: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Two alternatives for meeting the same air quality target:

A. Require all cars to comply and give poor a voucher to pay for a late model used car with low emissions.

B. Exempt older vehicles and impose much stricter emissions standards on newer vehicles.

Page 59: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

What Behavioral Economics Teaches Us about the Current Economic Crisis

Page 60: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Herbert Hoover

Page 61: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Spend More Right Away

John Maynard Keynes

The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and

Money, 1936

Page 62: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Even useless activities can be effective stimulus.

Page 63: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

But useful activities are clearly better.

Page 64: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Standard model assumes

1. People are properly attentive to all relevant costs and benefits.

2.Utility depends only on absolute consumption.

Why did the crisis happen?

Page 65: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 66: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Should we try to do something about global warming?

Page 67: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Climate change forecasts are extremely uncertain.

Page 68: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 69: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

A 7-degree C temperature rise would mean the end of life on earth.

Page 70: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 71: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 72: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Ford Bronco15 mpg

Ford Focus32 mpg

Page 73: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 74: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

Acid Rain and the Market for SO2 Permits

Page 75: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

“The claim that global warming is caused by man-made emissions is simply untrue and not based on sound science.”

Senator James Inhofe (R, Oklahoma)

Page 76: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

“Global warming is bad, but it doesn’t make us feel nauseated or angry or disgraced, and thus we don’t feel compelled to rail against it as we do against other momentous threats to our species, such as flag burning.”

Dan Gilbert

Page 77: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 78: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 79: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University
Page 80: Behavioral Economics and Economic Policy Robert H. Frank Cornell University

A tax on any activity has two effects:

1. It generates revenue.

2. It discourages the activity.

The current tax system taxes mostly useful activities, such as savings and job creation.

If we instead taxed only harmful activities, we could raise all the revenue we need without requiring any painful sacrifices.