beliefs and utility - experimental evidence on preferences ... · beliefs and utility -...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on
Preferences for Information
Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn(joint with Florian Zimmermann)
June 2017 - Belief Based Utility Conference, CMU
![Page 2: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
Beliefs
• Standard economic approach to beliefs/information isinstrumental.
• Information is required for taking decisions.
→ We seek to hold precise beliefs.→ We prefer precise information sooner rather than later.
![Page 3: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
• Alternative view: beliefs are directly utility-relevant.
• Beliefs about future outcomes affect well-being in terms ofpositive or negative anticipatory utility.
• Surgery in near future• Prospects of a nice holiday
![Page 4: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction
Possible implications of anticipatory utility
• Important determinant of well-being.
• Systematic belief distortions.
• Preferences over information structures.
• Determinant of demand for information.• Policy instrument: how to inform
workers/patients/stakeholders?
![Page 5: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Introduction
• Starting with Loewenstein (1987), theoretical work has madesubstantial progress in modeling the notion that beliefs aboutor the anticipation of future consumption has directutility-consequences:
• Pagel (2014, 2016), Golman, Loewenstein and Gurney (2016),Golman and Loewenstein (2015), Ely et al. (2015), Bénabou(2013), Schweizer and Szech (2013), Koszegi and Rabin(2009), Epstein (2008), Koszegi (2006), Brunnermeier andParker (2005), Caplin and Leahy (2001, 2004)).
• Empirical knowledge lacks behind
![Page 6: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Introduction
This paper
• Empirical insights on anticipatory utility by exploringindividuals’ preferences for information.
• Informed by theory, we study four questions related toinformation preferences
1 Sooner versus later information?2 What is the role of attention?3 Clumped versus piecewise information?4 Role of priors?
![Page 7: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Experimental Set-up
![Page 8: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Design
Design Challenges
• Set-up where information is non-instrumental.
• Control over timing of information transmission - subjects needto realize information at time we want them to.
• Outcome that is likely to cause belief-based utility.
![Page 9: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Design
In the experiment
• A lottery determines whether or not a subject receives anaversive stimulus.
• Stimulus consists of a series of 30 electric shocks.
• Information about receiving vs. not receiving shocks.
![Page 10: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Design
![Page 11: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Design
Why electric stimulus?
• Prospect of imminent stimulus triggers negative anticipatoryemotions (Berns et al. (2006), Schmitz and Grillon (2012)).
![Page 12: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Design
Implementation of lotteries
• Subject is presented 10 sealed envelopes.
• 5 envelopes contain a red card and 5 contain a blue card.
• Subject picks 5 envelopes.
• Realization of outcome (shocks) depends on number of redcards in the 5 selected envelopes.
• high ex-ante likelihood: shocks if at least 1 envelope containsa red card (> 99 percent)
• medium: if at least 3 envelopes contain red cards (50 percent)• low: if all 5 envelopes contain red cards (< 1 percent)
![Page 13: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Dimension 1 - Sooner versus Later Information
![Page 14: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Sooner versus Later
• At t = 0, subjects decide between sooner or later informationabout whether they receive aversive stimulus at t = 15.
• Three conditions (varying priors):
• high ex-ante likelihood of shock• medium ex-ante likelihood of shock• low ex-ante likelihood of shock
![Page 15: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Sooner versus Later
Timing
![Page 16: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Sooner versus Later
Predictions
• Key motive in Brunnermeier and Parker (2005) is thatindividuals should want information later.
• Koszegi and Rabin (2009) instead predict a (weak) preferencefor sooner information.
![Page 17: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Results - Sooner versus Later
Sooner versus Later:
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1
% o
f so
on
er
ch
oic
es
SLlow SLhigh SLmed
In all three conditions, significant difference from random choice(50-50) using binomial tests (p-values < 0.01).
![Page 18: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Dimension 2 - Attention
![Page 19: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Attention
How does limited attention affect information choices?
• In treatments above, attention is very focused on outcome.
• We change experimental environment by offering subjects anentertaining and distracting activity during experiment (aquiz).
• Choice is again between sooner and later information.
• In a control condition, we take the distracting activity away.
![Page 20: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Attention
Timing
![Page 21: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Attention
Prediction
• Golman and Loewenstein (2015): subjects in the mainattention treatment should be more likely to choose laterinformation, compared to attention control treatment
• Quiz absorbs attention and allows Ss not to focus on outcome.
![Page 22: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Results - Attention
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1
% o
f sooner
choic
es
AttContr SLlow SLhigh SLmed
![Page 23: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Results - Attention
Attention Management
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1
% o
f sooner
choic
es
AttMain AttContr SLlow SLhigh SLmed
![Page 24: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Results
Probit regressions:
![Page 25: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Results
• Maybe differences between AttMain and AttControl merelyreflect a motive to stay focused on the quiz?
• People might not want to obtain any information during theinterruption of the quiz in AttMain, because they want toconcentrate on the quiz.
• We conducted two placebo conditions identical to AttMainand AttControl, except that we removed the electric shockcomponent - information was on whether subjects won or lostin a monetary lottery.
• No effect of attention for placebo conditions...
![Page 26: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Dimension 3 - Clumped versus Piecewise
![Page 27: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Clumped versus Piecewise
Treatment Variations - Clumped versus Piecewise
• at t = 0, subjects decide between clumped and piecewiseinformation about whether they receive aversive stimulus at t=15.
• Three conditions (varying priors):
• high ex-ante likelihood of shock• medium ex-ante likelihood of shock• low ex-ante likelihood of shock
![Page 28: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Clumped versus Piecewise
Timing
![Page 29: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Clumped versus Piecewise
Predictions
• Koszegi and Rabin (2009) predict an aversion to piecemealinformation.
• Ely, Frankel and Kamenica (2015) model consequences ofpleasure from suspense and surprise on information preferencesand show that if people like suspense they should preferpiecemeal information.
![Page 30: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Results - Clumped versus Piecewise
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1
% o
f clu
mped c
hoic
es
CPlow CPhigh CPmed
But, distinct aversion towards piecemeal information?
![Page 31: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Results - Clumped versus Piecewise
Identification of attitude towards piecemeal information
• Problem: variation of clumped versus piecewise necessarilyimplies variation in sooner versus later.
• Solution
• use observations from sooner versus later choices as benchmark• analyze if we can find a preference for clumped or piecemeal
information on top of attitudes towards sooner or laterinformation.
![Page 32: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Results - Clumped versus Piecewise
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1
% o
f so
on
er
ch
oic
es
SLlow SLhigh SLmed0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1
% o
f clu
mp
ed
ch
oic
es
CPlow CPhigh CPmed
![Page 33: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Results
Probit regression analysis
![Page 34: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Dimension 4 - Variations in Prior
![Page 35: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Variations in Prior
• Both for choices between sooner and later information, and forchoices between clumped and piecewise information we variedthe prior.
![Page 36: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Variations in Prior
Predictions
• Most existing theories predict that the sign of informationpreferences should not depend on priors.
• Exception is Epstein (2008)
![Page 37: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Results - Variations in Prior
Probit regression analysis
![Page 38: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Conclusion
In a set-up with information about a real and aversive consumptionevent, we find that
• Preferences for sooner or later information are not uniform butdepend on context.
• in baseline choices, most subjects preferred sooner over laterinformation.
• but in the presence of an alternative activity, subjects useinformation to steer attention.
• makes later information more attractive.
• Subjects are averse to piecemeal information.
• Ex-ante likelihoods do not affect information choices.
⇒ evidence for key intuitions developed in Koszegi and Rabin(2009) and Golman and Loewenstein (2015)
![Page 39: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Thank You
![Page 40: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
“Appendix”3 additional control treatments
1 we elicit the willingness to pay to NOT obtain shock series
• 25 participants• average WTP is 8.3 euros• median = 8, Std. Dev. = 5.40
2 we ask for subjects perception of shock series afterexperiencing it - scale from “1” (not at all unpleasant) to “7”(very unpleasant)
• 24 participants• average = 5.5• median = 5, Std. Dev. = 1.27
3 we check for strategic undereporting in calibration phase
• 24 participants in add. treatment• no significant diff. between calibration in main treatments
compared to add. treatment (t-test, t = −0.85, p = 0.40;Ranksum-test, z = −0.77, p = 0.44)
![Page 41: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
“Appendix”
Probit regressions:
![Page 42: Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences ... · Beliefs and Utility - Experimental Evidence on Preferences for Information Armin Falk - briq and University of Bonn](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040401/5e7c3fe39d5b366d400e72ed/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
“Appendix”
Probit regressions: