benchmarking resource plays: implications for exploitation and

42
Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and Development Mike Seifert, P. Geol.

Upload: phungdan

Post on 02-Jan-2017

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

Development

Mike Seifert, P. Geol.

Page 2: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

AGENDA

Introduction What is a Resource Play Benchmarking Process

Western Canada Overview Montney Slave Point Integrated Analysis: Carrot Cr and Rat Creek

Page 3: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

WHAT IS A RESOURCE PLAY?

“A 'play' is a family of pools and/or prospects that share a common historyof hydrocarbon generation, migration, reservoir development and trapconfiguration.

A RESOURCE PLAY is a special category ofplay which implies the use, or potential use,of advanced drilling and/or completiontechnology to make it economic.

Although specific wells may be exceptions, generally speaking aRESOURCE PLAY is deemed to be historically uneconomic on a regionalbasis without the use of advanced technology.”

Ed Fogg, Canadian Discovery Ltd.

Page 4: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

RESOURCE PLAY DEFINITION

Requires Extensive Stimulation to Produce Produces Little In-situ Water Does Not Exhibit an Obvious Seal or Trap Low Matrix Permeability (< 0.1 mD)

SPEE Monograph 3“Guidelines For The Practical Evaluation ofUndeveloped Reserves in Resource Plays”

Page 5: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

WHY BENCHMARK?

Internal Analysis Competitor Analysis Technologies and Methodologies Logistics Acquisition & Divestitures Financial Metrics

Page 6: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

RESOURCE PLAYS IN WESTERN CANADA

0

5

10

15

20

25

Bakken Cardium Horn River Montney

Average Stages Completed / Year

200620072008200920102011

Page 7: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

RESOURCE PLAYS IN WESTERN CANADA

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Bakken Cardium Horn River Montney

Average Completed Length

200620072008200920102011

Page 8: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Bakken Cardium Horn River Montney

Average Frac Spacing

200620072008200920102011

RESOURCE PLAYS IN WESTERN CANADA

Page 9: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

RESOURCE PLAYS IN WESTERN CANADA

0

50

100

150

200

250

Bakken Cardium Horn River Montney

Average Proppant / Stage (t)

200620072008200920102011

Page 10: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

$11 $114

$1,553

$337

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Bakken Cardium Horn River Montney

IP BOE/d (6:1)

Completion Cost($K/Stage)

Average IP (BOE/D) & Completion Cost ($K/Stage)2010 / 2011 Wells

RESOURCE PLAYS IN WESTERN CANADA

Page 11: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

Number of Wells by Resource Play Group

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

2008 2009 2010 2011

Num

ber o

f Wells

Year

Horn River GasMontney/Doig GasMontney/Doig OilDeep Basin GasSlave Point/Swan Hills OilGlauconitic Hoadley GasCardium OilViking OilShaunavon OilBakken/Torquay OilSpearfish/Amaranth OilEmerging OilEmerging Gas

3,860

5,041

1,7531,922

Page 12: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

Completions Investment ($M) by Resource Play Group

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

2008 2009 2010 2011

Completion Co

st (m

illion $)

Year

Horn River GasMontney/Doig GasMontney/Doig OilDeep Basin GasSlave Point/Swan Hills OilGlauconitic Hoadley GasCardium OilViking OilShaunavon OilBakken/Torquay OilSpearfish/Amaranth OilEmerging OilEmerging Gas

$5.5 billion

$7.9 billion

$2.5 billion

$2.0 billion

Page 13: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

RESOURCE PLAYS IN WESTERN CANADA

Increasing Stages Increasing Well Length Decreasing Frac Spacing ProppantBakken DecreasingMontney Increasing

Page 14: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

NORTHERN MONTNEY

Source: Canadian Discovery Ltd. EDGE

Page 15: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

01/06/2008 18/12/2008 06/07/2009 22/01/2010 10/08/2010 26/02/2011 14/09/2011 01/04/2012

Stages Completed

PROGRESS BONAVISTA CANBRIAM TALISMAN

NORTHERN MONTNEY

Page 16: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

01/06/2008 18/12/2008 06/07/2009 22/01/2010 10/08/2010 26/02/2011 14/09/2011 01/04/2012

Completed Length (m)

PROGRESS BONAVISTA CANBRIAM TALISMAN

NORTHERN MONTNEY

Page 17: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

01/06/2008 18/12/2008 06/07/2009 22/01/2010 10/08/2010 26/02/2011 14/09/2011

Completion Cost / Stage ($K)

BONAVISTA CANBRIAM PROGRESS TALISMAN

NORTHERN MONTNEY

Page 18: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

01/06/2008 18/12/2008 06/07/2009 22/01/2010 10/08/2010 26/02/2011 14/09/2011 01/04/2012

IP Gas (mcf/d)

PROGRESS BONAVISTA CANBRIAM TALISMAN

NORTHERN MONTNEY

Page 19: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

09/09/200818/12/200828/03/200906/07/200914/10/200922/01/201002/05/201010/08/201018/11/201026/02/201106/06/2011

6 Mo. Cal Gas Rate / Stage (mcf/d)

PROGRESS BONAVISTA CANBRIAM TALISMAN

NORTHERN MONTNEY

Page 20: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Average Proppant / Stage (t)

IP GAS (mcf/d) 6 Mo Cal Gas Rate (mcf/d)

NORTHERN MONTNEY

Page 21: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

05000

100001500020000250003000035000400004500050000

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Average Proppant / Stage (t)

Total Fluid Pumped (m3)

NORTHERN MONTNEY

Page 22: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

NoYes

NORTHERN MONTNEY

Use of Cluster Fracs

Page 23: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

TALISMAN VS PROGRESS

Longer Well LengthsMore Stages / WellGreater Cum Production

NORTHERN MONTNEY SUMMARY

Page 24: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

Source: Canadian Discovery Ltd.

SLAVE POINT

Page 25: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

05

101520253035

10/10/2006 22/02/2008 06/07/2009 18/11/2010 01/04/2012

Stages Completed

EVI OTTERJUDY CR. ETHELSWAN HILLS SWAN HILLS SOUTH

SLAVE POINT

Page 26: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

500

1000

1500

2000

06/07/2009 22/01/2010 10/08/2010 26/02/2011 14/09/2011 01/04/2012

Completed Length (m)

EVI OTTERJUDY CR. ETHELSWAN HILLS SWAN HILLS SOUTH

SLAVE POINT

Page 27: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

10/10/2006 22/02/2008 06/07/2009 18/11/2010 01/04/2012

Completion Cost / Stage ($K)

EVI OTTERJUDY CR. ETHELSWAN HILLS SWAN HILLS SOUTH

SLAVE POINT

Page 28: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

06/07/2009 22/01/2010 10/08/2010 26/02/2011 14/09/2011

IP Oil (bop/d)

EVI OTTERJUDY CR. ETHELSWAN HILLS SWAN HILLS SOUTH

SLAVE POINT

Page 29: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 10 20 30 40 50 60Average Proppant / Stage

OTTER IP (bopd)EVI IP (bopd)

SLAVE POINT

Page 30: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

50

100

150

200

250

OTTER EVI JUDYCR

ETHEL SWANHILLS

SWANHILLS S.

Slave Point Oil Rate by Field

IP OIL (bopd) 6 Mo Rate (bopd) 12 mo Rate (bopd)

SLAVE POINT

Page 31: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

010203040506070

OTTER EVI JUDYCR

ETHEL SWANHILLS

SWANHILLS S.

Slave Point Oil Cums by Field

6 Mo. CUM OIL (mbo) 12 Mo. CUM OIL (mbo)18 Mo. CUM OIL (mbo)

SLAVE POINT

Page 32: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

SLAVE POINT SUMMARY

EVI JUDY CREEK

Proppant No Proppant~$125/stage ~$150/Stage12 Stages 15 Stages400 – 500 m 1,000 m

GEOLOGY MATTERS

Page 33: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

Source: CDL Cardium Resource Play Overview Study, 2010

CARDIUM: RAT CREEK / CARROT CREEK

Page 34: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

Detail: Minimum Principal Stress Pembina Field

R7W5MR13

T46

T52

Source:  Stress Analysis Study, RPCL & BJ, 2005 and the Well Completions & Frac Database

CARDIUM: RAT CREEK / CARROT CREEK

Page 35: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 5 10 15 20 25

ATTEMPT

ED STA

GES

ACTUAL STAGES

Carrot Creek vs. Rat Creek

Carrot Creek

Rat Creek

CARDIUM: RAT CREEK / CARROT CREEK

Page 36: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

CARDIUM: RAT CREEK / CARROT CREEK

Page 37: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

0

50

100

150

200

250

Oil Slickwater Water

AVER

AGE IP (B

OPD

)

BASE FLUID

Initial Production vs. Base Fluid and Energizer

CARROT CREEK ‐ N2

CARROT CREEK ‐UNENERGIZED

RAT CREEK ‐ N2

RAT CREEK ‐UNENERGIZED

12

14

3

44

12

14

15

213

CARDIUM: RAT CREEK / CARROT CREEK

Page 38: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

3‐Month Initial Production Rate Map

Base map generated with ArcMap ™

CARDIUM HORIZONTAL

Page 39: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

Hz Wells - type Prod decline curves

Data Source IHS Energy 

CARROT CREEK VS. RAT CREEK

Page 40: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

Data Source IHS Energy 

AVG IP RATE BY WELLBORE ORIENTATION

Page 41: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

CARDIUM: RAT CREEK / CARROT CREEK

Rat Creek Higher Stress Operational Failures Base Fluids & Energizers

CDD Article “Stressed Out in the Cardium”

Page 42: Benchmarking Resource Plays: Implications for Exploitation and

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSo Matt Bairdo Razan Das, E.I.T.o Meridee Fockler, P.Geol.o Daniel LaPlanteo Ally Masoudo Heather McCrank, MBA, CMAo Aliyyah Mohamed, B.A.o Kevin Rakhit, B. Sc.o Neil Watson, P.Geol.

o Jean Beriault, P.Eng.o Andrea Nawolsky, C.E.T.o Peter Singbeil, P. Eng.o John Siferd, R.E.T.o Don Waters, P.Eng.