benchmarking the creative economy in rural ontario · benchmarking the creative economy in rural...

74
Benchmarking the Creative Economy in Rural Ontario Kevin Stolarick Building Rural Resilience Queens/Monieson April 8, 2012

Upload: others

Post on 29-Dec-2019

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Benchmarking the Creative

    Economy in Rural Ontario

    Kevin Stolarick

    Building Rural Resilience

    Queens/Monieson April 8, 2012

  • 2

    1. Creativity in the Rural Context

    2. Regions/Benchmarks

    3. Results

    4. Summary & Conclusions

    Brief Overview

  • Creative Economy in Rural Ontario

    3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

    Central

  • 7

  • Central - Overview

    • Central region of Ontario has a

    population of 8,215,076

    • 91% of Region in Metros – Toronto, Peterborough, Oshawa, Hamilton, St. Catharine’s-

    Niagara, Kitchener, Brantford, Guelph and Barrie

    • Focus Community: Midland

    8

  • Central

    9

  • Central

    10

  • Central – Selected Observations & Opportunities

    •Occupations –Grow professionals in arts & culture and natural &

    applied sciences

    –Technical (support) above average.

    • “Meds and Eds” –The problem with “meds & eds”

    –Shift away

    –Maintain current levels

    –Don’t make a focus

    11

  • 12

    East

  • 13

  • East - Overview

    • East Region of Ontario has a population

    of 1,723,135

    • 60% of Region in Metros – Ottawa, Kingston

    • Highest Regional Creative Class Share

    • Focus Community: Brockville

    14

  • 15

  • 16

  • East - Selected Observations & Opportunities

    • Leverage Creative Class Share – Geographic advantage

    – Population position

    • Diversity – Higher scores on diversity indicators

    – Build immigrant attraction strategies

    – “Steal” from nearby regions

    17

  • 18

    Southwest

  • 19

  • Southwest - Overview

    • Southwest region of Ontario has a

    population of 1,591,240

    • 49% of Region in Metros – Windsor, London

    • Focus Community: Goderich

    20

  • 21

  • 22

  • Southwest - Selected Observations & Opportunities

    • Service Class – High employment

    – Good incomes (relatively)

    – Higher wage service class jobs?

    • Demographics – Older population

    – Opportunity for specialized healthcare services

    – Regional leader

    23

  • 24

    Northeast

  • 25

  • Northeast - Overview

    • Northeast region of Ontario has a population

    of 571,608

    • 28% of Region in Metros – Sudbury

    • Focus Community: Temiskaming Shores

    26

  • 27

  • 28

  • Northeast - Selected Observations & Opportunities

    • Amenities – Strong base

    – Low crime

    – Tourists and new residents

    • Farming/Fishing/Forestry

    –Small but relatively strong

    –Guelph research station

    –Natural sciences professionals

    29

  • 30

    Northwest

  • 31

  • Northwest - Overview

    • Northwest region of Ontario has a

    population of 245,026

    • 50% of Region in Metros – Thunder Bay

    • Focus Community: Dryden

    32

  • 33

  • 34

  • Northwest - Selected Observations & Opportunities

    • Technology – Have tech support workers

    – Get professionals

    • Regional Hub – Regional hub for extraction companies

    – “Toronto of the North”

    – Support Services

    – Education/Training

    • Education – Improve post-secondary opportunities

    35

  • Summary

    (228 pages)

    36

    Canadian Gothic

    Artist Ron Simmer

  • Summary

    37

  • Conclusions?

    38

  • Professional Advice

    • Rural opportunities exist – Tricky to identify

    – Emerging creative economy – not just cultural industries

    – Jurisdictional considerations

    – Alternative opportunities

    – Unique local strategies

    – Avoiding “death by best practice”

    – Generate true regional prosperity

    • Report as toolkit – ED professionals

    – Civic and community leaders

    – Consultants

    39

  • “Urban” Policy

    Urban policy

    is not

    social policy.

    40

  • “Urban” Policy

    Urban policy

    is not

    social policy.

    Urban policy

    is

    economic policy.

    41

  • “Urban” Policy

    Urban policy

    is not

    social policy.

    Urban policy

    is

    economic policy.

    What happens when you’re not “urban”?

    What’s your economic policy?

    42

  • “Urban” Policy

    What about “non-urban” areas??

    •Think Big

    •Look Big

    •Use a shotgun, not a rifle • (Super secret strategy #4)

    43

  • Think Big

    44

  • Look Big

    45

  • Use a Shotgun not a Rifle

    46

  • (Super Secret Strategy #4)

    47

  • Conclusions (!)

    “The key to success in today’s creative economy is for each

    region to understand its own strengths and weaknesses.

    Commiserating by looking at the challenges other regions are

    facing may be cathartic, and looking with envy at other

    successful regions may be a palliative, but neither will help the

    region succeed. Increasing regional prosperity for any region

    requires a clear picture of the current situation and an

    understanding of who is leaving the region, who is staying, and

    who is moving in. By understanding and leveraging current

    strengths, a region can improve its chance of success. It is only

    by understanding its unique challenges and opportunities that

    any region can advance.”

    48

  • Thank You

    Kevin Stolarick

    [email protected]

    www.martinprosperity.org

  • Creative Class

    50

  • Who Works in Creative Class?

    Creative Class: TAPE

    T = Technology and R&D Innovation

    A = Arts and Culture

    P = Professional and Managerial

    E = Educating and Training

    51

  • U.S. Creative Class

    •30 (% of the workforce)

    •40 (million people)

    •50 (% of the wages)

    •70 (% of the discretionary income)

    52

  • The Rise of the Creative Class

    53

  • The Rise of the Creative Class

    Creative

    Service

    Working

    Farming

    54

  • 55

    Share of creativity-oriented jobs is increasing

  • Canada & Ontario’s Creative Economy

    Creative Service Working

    Canada

    Workers (Talent) 4,874,885 5,788,767 3,333,726

    % of Workforce 35.5% 38.7% 23.0%

    On

    tari

    o

    Workers (Talent) 2,027,152 2,210,604 1,311,995

    % of Workforce 33.2% 39.4% 22.7%

    56

  • 57

    New jobs will be in creativity-oriented and routine-oriented service occupations

  • 58

    Nearly 80 percent of jobs in Canada are in services industries

  • Unemployment is higher in routine-oriented occupations especially in early 90s recession

    -59

  • Ontario’s distinctive advantage can be created through actions on four fronts

    61

  • The “4Ts”

    Talent

    Tolerance (Inclusiveness)

    Technology

    Territory Assets (Amenities)

    Regional

    Growth and

    Prosperity

    62

  • Rural* Context

    *Non-metropolitan

    63

  • Creativity in the Rural Context

    Share of All

    Jobs

    Share of

    Creative Class Jobs

    Metro Ontario 79.6% 85.4%

    Rural Ontario 20.4% 14.6%

  • Regions/ Benchmarks

    66

  • 67

  • Region/Benchmarks Variables

    • Regional Economics – Population, Income, Housing Value, Population Growth,

    Unemployment etc.

    • Occupational Classes – Creative Class, Working Class, Service Class, and Farming, Fishing &

    Forestry Class

    • Talent – % of Population 25+ with a BA or above, other education data

    • Technology – High Tech Establishments/High Tech LQ

    • Tolerance – Immigrant and Visible minority population share

    • Territorial Assets – Crime, Voter Turnout, Rec Establishments, Arts & Entertainment

    Establishments, Bars & Restaurants

    68

  • Other Regions? So what if my region wasn’t selected?

    •Appendix for methodology –DIY

    •Swap: Benchmark Focus

    –Really 50 Reports

    •Keep to your region

    –Or not

    •StatsCan – CSD Level

    –Region, Rural, Ontario Summaries

    –50 potential benchmark regions

    69

  • 70

  • Outline

    71

    • The objective of this research is to examine the

    creative economy in rural communities across Ontario

    and produce a document that can then be used by

    any community seeking to better understand how to

    execute creative economy research and begin to

    interpret results.

    • We hope to contribute to the existing body of research

    on the creative economy in rural communities and

    assist in the transfer of that knowledge in an

    accessible format to reach and better inform

    communities interested in applying the concepts

    themselves.

  • Selection of regions/benchmarking variables

    • 5 communities (CSDs) selected for analysis from 5 different regions of

    Ontario

    • The types of data examined will focus on the occupational structure of the

    workforce and attempt to provide measures that characterize a community’s

    creative and quality of life assets, including its levels of talent, technology.

    72

  • Selection of regions/benchmarking variables

    73

    • Peer regions chosen based on population and location within the

    economic regions

    • The types of data presented depict the occupational structure of the

    workforce and provide measures that characterize a community’s level

    of creative assets, including its level of talent, technology and tolerance

    • Benchmarking & Focus Communities are selected Census

    Subdivisions with populations between 5,000 and 20,000

    • Metro Ontario is defined as within a census metropolitan area

    • Rural Ontario is defined as everything else

  • • The description of the methodology and analytical work done

    in the report will ensure that any community can reproduce the

    analysis and benchmarking activities

    • Will allow communities not only to gauge their own

    performance in the creative economy, identifying strengths,

    weaknesses and opportunities, but also to better understand

    how their community fits within the larger context of the region

    in which they exist

    • Any region not included in this report can obtain information

    about their region from Statistics Canada at the CSD level and

    compare their results with the focus and benchmarking regions

    reported here.

    How are the findings applicable to all communities? Where do they go from here? Why does it mater?