benefits and challenges of live streaming events and challenges of live streaming events michael...
TRANSCRIPT
Benefits and Challenges of
Live Streaming Events
Michael Beird
Erin Handel
Co-Founders, BankersHub
April 15, 2014
Overview of Today’s Discussion
Different types of Traditional Events
The hybrid, or live streaming event and example
Features and benefits of the hybrid event
Why companies may want to consider live streaming
Developing and staging the right content
Overcoming objections and cannibalization
Additional recommendations and considerations
2
Traditional Events Environment
3
Live Conferences/Gatherings
Pros
• Watch presenter(s)
• Ask questions to presenter
• Network with others
• Get information real-time
• Sponsorship opportunities
• Cool giveaways (pens, Slinkies, etc.)
Cons
• Audience limited to physical attendees
• Expensive for attendees
• Expensive for organizers
• Large time commitment
• No playbacks or archives for later
Why customers choose to NOT attend live events
4
Source: Meeting Professionals International (MPI)
http://www.mpiweb.org/Home
Traditional Events Environment
5
Live Conferences/Gatherings
Pros
• Watch presenter(s)
• Ask questions to presenter
• Network with others
• Get information real-time
• Sponsorship opportunities
• Cool giveaways (pens, Slinkies, etc.)
Cons
• Audience limited to physical attendees
• Expensive for attendees
• Expensive for organizers
• Large time commitment
• No playbacks or archives for later
Webinars and Webcasts
Pros
• Unlimited audience potential
• Hear presenter(s)
• Ask questions to presenter via chat
• Hot topics and „breaking‟ news
• Get information real-time
• Relatively inexpensive for attendees
and organizers/companies
• Recordings/playbacks often available
• Sponsorship opportunities
• Technology fairly simple
Cons
• No visual of presenters
• No interaction/networking with others
• No cool giveaways
Traditional Events Environment
6
Live Conferences/Gatherings
Pros
• Watch presenter(s)
• Ask questions to presenter
• Network with others
• Get information real-time
• Sponsorship opportunities
• Cool giveaways (pens, Slinkies, etc.)
Cons
• Audience limited to physical attendees
• Expensive for attendees
• Expensive for organizers
• Large time commitment
• No playbacks or archives for later
6
Webinars and Webcasts
Pros
• Unlimited audience potential
• Hear presenter(s)
• Ask questions to presenter via chat
• Hot topics and „breaking‟ news
• Get information real-time
• Relatively inexpensive for attendees
and organizers/companies
• Recordings/playbacks often available
• Sponsorship opportunities
• Technology fairly simple
Cons
• No visual of presenters
• No interaction/networking with others
• No cool giveaways
Live Streaming “Hybrid”
Pros
• Unlimited audience potential
• Hear and watch presenter(s)
• Ask questions to presenter via chat
• Hot topics and „breaking‟ news
• Get information real-time
• Relatively inexpensive for attendees
• Recordings/playbacks often available
• Sponsorship opportunities
Cons
• Technology expensive and requires
specific media A/V skill sets
• No interaction/networking with others
• No cool giveaways
Live stream - Product
Live Stream events are online sessions where the video (picture of
speaker), data (ppt) and audio are streamed live to a virtual audience
in real time, as the event is happening.
Any physical event producer is a potential user of live streaming
7
Live stream – Features and Benefits
Gets larger numbers of attendees and additional revenues from an existing physical event
Gives critical information to attendees who cannot afford to travel or be out of the office
Utilizes cutting edge technology for a step above the “usual” webinar
• Shows the speaker live, making attendees feel as though they are really “there”
Allows access to archived sessions from which others in the organization may benefit
The Event Producer can charge additional sponsorship for live streaming
8
Potential uses of live streaming technology vary
A 2012 survey by Meeting Professionals International (MPI) found
that half had never planned a hybrid event and 25% never saw one
62% believe that hybrid, live streaming events are just broadcasting
to an online audience
However over 50% were aware that this technology leaves a „legacy‟:
• It captures both video and audio for later playback
• Playback can be provided to customers or employees who were
unable to attend or watch
• Playbacks can also be sold as stand alone content going forward
or with extracts used in marketing materials, promotions, etc.
• This saves money having to re-shoot or re-assemble subject
matter experts, speakers, etc. at a later date.
In the end, however, what format gets used depends on the
audience, industry, available technology and usage afterwards
9
Examples of why companies should
consider doing a hybrid event
Announcing the launching new products and services
Annual user conferences or shareholder meetings
Corporate training for remote locations
Executive briefings, announcements or updates
Sponsored briefings, updates or „infommercials‟
Customer interviews
10
Developing and staging the content
Determine if there will be a live audience, or is it a „closed‟ event
Understand and evaluate the physical environment
• Lighting
• Acoustics
• Seating
Anticipate role of physical attendees and limitations of virtual audience
• Q&A
• Breakout groups
Identify opportunities to poll/survey virtual audience
Prepare and coach speakers in advance
Test, practice and test again
11
Ways to drive revenue and/or increase attendance
Create new revenue by charging for content from attendees who are
new to your organization
Create new revenue by upselling the playbacks to attendees on site
Build sponsorship opportunities into the offerings (i.e., logo on the live
stream interface, mention of sponsor on the webcast, ability for sponsor
to moderate the online Q&A, etc.
Give your exhibitors a change to enhance their expo by having a live
streaming session/demo from the expo hall.
12
Addressing objections to live streaming and hybrids
13
Source: Meeting Professionals International (MPI)
http://www.mpiweb.org/Home
Perception of cannibalizing live attendance
Associations and conference organizers have argued that virtual events
reduce physical attendance and revenues through „cannibalization‟
Recently, PCMA released survey results that showed not only are they NOT
cannibalizing in person attendance, they are increasing BOTH in person and
hybrid
When asked if attending the hybrid event would make them more likely to
attend a physical event, only 7% said it wouldn‟t.
PCMA is seeing both and increase in hybrid attendance AND physical
attendance
14
Additional recommendations and considerations
Live streaming hybrid events offers opportunities to capture revenues to help
alleviate expenses
• Separate registration for virtual attendees
• Sales of recorded playbacks after the event
• Sponsored ads/banners of broadcast events from third parties
Deciding when to offer Free vs. Charged-For content
• Free
– Attracts a larger audience, but may not be true „buyers‟ or decision makers
– Can be promoted through viral channels to create larger buzz
– For internal content such as training, information dissemination, updates
– Great for reaching out to customers and prospects regarding products, services, etc.,
such as user conferences, shareholder meetings, and sales demonstrations
• Charged-For Content
– Informational/educational content for public…not sales or promotional in nature
– Offer additional materials, handouts and takeaways
– Be specific in promotions and online about what will (or won‟t) be covered in the event
– Consider offering the playback free for attendees, in case there is a schedule conflict
15
Questions
16
312.316.0305
781.588.3147