ber performance improvement using fading techniques

6
 B E   Abstract multipath fad problems in p channel and t the receiver. T due to differ channel and algorithms for of Additive W are explored particular, Le equalizers ar compensate fo of equalizers i we have comb Combing Dive combining te interference a approaches h performance.  Key Words The radio multipath fad interference i interference f diversity algo can be para characterized amplitudes sh of terminals large number (OFDM) sym estimating an the wireless attenuation, a of OFDM is function of c amplitude an from the av removes the subsequent sy OFDM is a can accommo  based wirele integral part MIMO-OFD divides the av  but orthogo R Per viron The wireless c ing characteri oper reception e type of fadi he channel esti nt types of i in equipmen digital comm hite Gaussion and their p ast square Er used to pro r Inter-Symbo l variable in m ined Equal Ga rsity techniqu hniques is a d Inter-symbo ave resulted OFDM, Equ I.  INTR hannels in m ing channels, the received rom the signa rithm can be eterized as  by a delay ow fast tempo hile the del of orthogonal  bols. A possib d tracking the channel cause d phase shift to mitigate th annel estimati phase shift ailable pilot effect of the mbol demodul special case o date high data s systems. S of OFDM s systems pro ailable spectr al narrowba orma ent Us Deepmal mmunication stics and the . Therefore th g is most imp mation has bec nterference pr ts. In this nications syste oise and Mult erformance is ror equalizer vide the opti error. As the ultipath fadin in combining a s, and find t ble to fight l interference in big impr lizer, Diversity DUCTION obile radio sy which are ca signal. To re l, much kind sed. The wire a combinatio and comple al variations ys are almos frequency div le approach i delay [1].it i s an arbitrar in the receiv effect of ti on is to form caused by th information. wireless ch ation. multicarrier t rate requirem ince channel ystems. As mises higher m into a num d sub chan o ri ht © 2 ce Imp ng Co T Singh Pari is impaired by efore creates knowledge o rtant in desig ome very vast esent in wire thesis, estima ms in the pres ipath environ investigated. and Zero for um solution BER perform channel there nd Maximal R at Maximal R with Co-Cha roblem. The a vement in , QAM. stems are usu sing intersy ove intersy of equalizers less radio cha of paths, amplitude. ue to the mob t constant ov sion multiple that of expli well known time dispers d signal. The e dispersion. an estimate o e wireless ca The equaliza nnel and all ransmission a ent of multim estimation is combinatio ata rates. OF er of overlap nels, and h Internation 012 IJECCE, rovem bined chniq ar the the the ning field lesss tion nce ent In cing and nce fore atio atio nnel ove ER ally  bol  bol and nel ach The ility er a ing itly that ion, use The the nel tion ows d it edia an of DM ing nce conver selecti  OFD Transf subcar comm capabil with r  bandw examp hiperla OFD subjec  OFD Modul in the Multip other i FDM. indepe multipl Fig. 2. PN l Journal of Ele ll r i ht reserv nt in Equali es Prof. R ts a frequency e channel [2]. ORTHOGO M is a mult rm/ Fast Fo iers. OFDM i nications sys ity with high gard to mult dth is divide e 2000-8000 n2 and data is method is so to multipath t M is a combi ation means a arrier phase, lexing means dependent da In OFDM dent channe exed to create Block diagra equence and tronics Commu V ed ultipa zer an vi Mohan selective cha  II.  OFD AL FREQU ULTIPLEX icarrier syste rier Transfo s becoming ems due to i andwidth effi ipath fading d into very hz for digi transmitted i  popular for ne ransmission. Fig. 1. ation of mod mapping of th requency or a a method of s ta channels. O the signal it s, modulated the OFDM ca of an OFD guard bit ins ication and Co olume 3, Issue 2, h Fadi Diver nel into a no  ENCY DIVIS NG) uses Discr m and idely applied s high rate tr ciency and its nd delay [4]. any narrow al TV and  parallel on t w broadband ulation and m e information mplitude or c haring a band FDM is a spe self is first  by data an rrier. system using rtion FFT is 161 puter Engineeri ISSN 2249 –071 g ity frequency ION te Fourier spectra for in wireless ansmission robustness Available  bands for 48 hz for ese bands. ystems are ltiplexing. on changes mbination. width with cial case of split into then re-  FFT, pilot ritten as g X

Upload: kondi-madhavi

Post on 04-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

7/29/2019 BER performance improvement using fading techniques

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ber-performance-improvement-using-fading-techniques 1/5

 

B

E

  Abstract —

multipath fadproblems in p

channel and tthe receiver. T

due to differ

channel andalgorithms for

of Additive W

are explored

particular, Le

equalizers arcompensate fo

of equalizers i

we have combCombing Dive

combining teinterference a

approaches h

performance.

 Key Words

The radio

multipath fad

interference iinterference f 

diversity algocan be para

characterizedamplitudes sh

of terminals

large number (OFDM) sym

estimating an

the wireless

attenuation, aof OFDM is

function of c

amplitude anfrom the av

removes the

subsequent sy

OFDM is a

can accommo based wirele

integral part

MIMO-OFDdivides the av

 but orthogo

R Per

viron

The wireless c

ing characterioper reception

e type of fadihe channel esti

nt types of i

in equipmendigital comm

hite Gaussion

and their p

ast square Er

used to pror Inter-Symbol

variable in m

ined Equal Garsity techniqu

hniques is ad Inter-symbo

ave resulted

OFDM, Equ

I. INTR

hannels in m

ing channels,

the receivedrom the signa

rithm can beeterized as

 by a delayow fast tempo

hile the del

of orthogonal bols. A possib

d tracking the

channel cause

d phase shiftto mitigate th

annel estimati

phase shiftailable pilot

effect of the

mbol demodul

special case o

date high datas systems. S

of OFDM s

systems proailable spectr 

al narrowba

orma

ent Us

Deepmal

mmunication

stics and the. Therefore th

g is most impmation has bec

nterference pr

ts. In thisnications syste

oise and Mult

erformance is

ror equalizer

vide the optierror. As the

ultipath fadin

in combining as, and find t

ble to fightl interference

in big impr

lizer, Diversity

DUCTION 

obile radio sy

which are ca

signal. To rel, much kind

sed. The wire

a combinatio

and compleal variations

ys are almos

frequency divle approach i

delay [1].it i

s an arbitrar 

in the receiveffect of ti

on is to form

caused by thinformation.

wireless ch

ation.

multicarrier t

rate requiremince channel

ystems. As

mises higher m into a num

d sub chan

o ri ht © 2

ce Imp

ng Co

TSingh Pari

is impaired by

efore createsknowledge o

rtant in desigome very vast

esent in wire

thesis, estimams in the pres

ipath environ

investigated.

and Zero for

um solutionBER perform

channel there

nd Maximal Rat Maximal R

with Co-Charoblem. The a

vement in

, QAM.

stems are usu

sing intersy

ove intersyof equalizers

less radio chaof paths,

amplitude.ue to the mob

t constant ov

sion multiplethat of expli

well known

time dispers

d signal. Thee dispersion.

an estimate o

e wireless caThe equaliza

nnel and all

ransmission a

ent of multimestimation is

combinatio

ata rates. OFer of overlap

nels, and h

Internation

012 IJECCE,

rovem

bined

chniqar

the

thethe

ningfield

lesss

tionnce

ent

In

cing

andnce

fore

atioatio

nnelove

ER

ally

 bol

 boland

nelach

Theility

er a

ingitly

that

ion,

useThe

the

neltion

ows

d it

ediaan

of 

DMing

nce

conver 

selecti 

OFD

Transf 

subcar comm

capabil

with r  bandw

examp

hiperlaOFD

subjec 

OFD

Modul

in theMultip

other i

FDM.

indepemultipl

Fig. 2.

PN

l Journal of Ele

ll ri ht reserv

nt in

Equali

esProf. R

ts a frequency

e channel [2].

ORTHOGO

M is a mult

rm/ Fast Fo

iers. OFDM inications sys

ity with high

gard to multdth is divide

e 2000-8000

n2 and data ismethod is so

to multipath t

M is a combi

ation means a

arrier phase,lexing means

dependent da

In OFDM

dent channeexed to create

Block diagra

equence and

tronics Commu

V

ed

ultipa

zer an

vi Mohan

selective cha

 

II.  OFD

AL FREQU

ULTIPLEX

icarrier syste

rier Transfo

s becomingems due to i

andwidth effi

ipath fadingd into very

hz for digi

transmitted i popular for ne

ransmission.

Fig. 1.

ation of mod

mapping of th

requency or aa method of s

ta channels. O

the signal it

s, modulatedthe OFDM ca

of an OFD

guard bit ins

ication and Co

olume 3, Issue 2,

h Fadi

Diver

nel into a no

 

ENCY DIVIS

NG)

uses Discr 

m and

idely applieds high rate tr 

ciency and its

nd delay [4].any narrow

al TV and

 parallel on tw broadband

ulation and m

e information

mplitude or charing a band

FDM is a spe

self is first

 by data anrrier.

system using

rtion FFT is

161

puter Engineeri

ISSN 2249 –071

g

ity

frequency

ION

te Fourier 

spectra for 

in wirelessansmission

robustness

Available bands for 

48 hz for 

ese bands.ystems are

ltiplexing.

on changes

mbination.width with

cial case of 

split into

then re-

 FFT, pilot

ritten as

g

X

7/29/2019 BER performance improvement using fading techniques

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ber-performance-improvement-using-fading-techniques 2/5

 

162

International Journal of Electronics Communication and Computer Engineering

Volume 3, Issue 2, ISSN 2249 –071X

Copyright © 2012 IJECCE, All right reserved

  ∑ / , 0 1 

…. (1) W N be the complex-valued phase factor 

Thus, X (k) becomes

  ∑

, 0 1 

…. (2)

Similarly IFFT is written as,

∑  

, 0 1 

.… (3)

III. QUADRATURE AMPLITUDE MODULATION

(QAM)

QAM is more efficient in terms of bandwidth than either 

FSK or QPSK, but it is also more susceptible to noise. Thedisadvantage of DSB signals which is occupy twice the

 bandwidth required for the baseband can be overcome by

transmitting two DSB signals using carriers of the samefrequency but in phase quadrature [5].

In this figure, the boxes labeled – π/2 are phase shifters,which delay the phase of an input sinusoid by – π/2 rad. If 

the two baseband signals to be transmitted are m1 (t) and m2 

(t), the corresponding QAM signal φQAM  (t), the sum of the

two DSB-modulated signals is

….. (4)

Both modulated signals occupy the same band. Yet two baseband signals can be separated at the receiver by

synchronous detection using two local carriers in phase

quadrature.

2  ……... (5)

2 2  ……... (6) 

The last two terms are suppressed by the low-pass filter,

yielding the desired output . Similarly, the output of the

lower receiver branch can be shown to be . This scheme isknown as quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM). Thus, two

 baseband signals, each of bandwidth B Hz, can be transmitted

simultaneously over a bandwidth 2B by using DSB transmission

and Quadrature multiplexing.

IV.  EQUALIZER 

Theoretically, an equalizer [6] should have a frequency

characteristic that is the inverse of that of the transmissionmedium. This will restore higher frequency components and

eliminate pulse dispersion. Unfortunately, this also increases the

received channel noise by boosting its high-frequencycomponents. For digital signals, however, complete equalization

is really not necessary, because a detector has to make relativelysimple decisions- such as whether the pulse is positive or 

negative.

4.1 Zero Forcing equalizer (ZF)It is really not necessary to eliminate or minimize ISI with

neighboring pulses for all t. all that is needed is to eliminate or minimize interference with neighboring pulses at their respectivesampling instants only, because the decision is based only on

sample values. This can be accomplished by the transversal-

filter equalizer encountered earlier, which forces the equalizer output pulse to have zero values at the sampling instants. In

other words, the equalizer output pulses should satisfy the

 Nyquists criterion or the controlled ISI criterion.

  ……… (7)

4.2  Least Mean Squared Error Equalizer (LMSE)Another approach to equalization, the least mean squared

error method, does not try to force the pulse samples to zero

at 2N points. Instead the mean of the squared errors over a

set of output samples is minimized [7].

The prediction error is given by

^

^

  …………. (8) 

  …………. (9) W k  is a weight vector 

To compute the mean square error || at time instant k.

||

2

  ……….… (10)

Taking the expected value of || over k yields

||

2

 …. (11)

7/29/2019 BER performance improvement using fading techniques

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ber-performance-improvement-using-fading-techniques 3/5

 

163

International Journal of Electronics Communication and Computer Engineering

Volume 3, Issue 2, ISSN 2249 –071X

Copyright © 2012 IJECCE, All right reserved

W k, filter weights are not included in the time average since,

for convenience, it is assumed that they have converged to

the optimum value and are not varying with time.

V. DIVERSITY 

Diversity techniques [8] are based on the notion thaterrors occur in reception when the channel attenuation is

large, i.e. when the channel is in a deep fade. If we can

supply to the receiver several replicas of the sameinformation signal transmitted over independently fading

channels, the probability that all the signal components will

fade simultaneously is reduced considerably.

5.1 Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC)In telecommunications, maximal-ratio combining [9] is a

method of diversity  combining in which: (a) the signals

from each channel are added together,(b) the gain of each

channel is made proportional to the rms signal level and

inversely proportional to the mean square noise level in that

channel.(c) different proportionality constants are used for 

each channel. It is also known as ratio-squared

combining and predetection combining. Maximal-ratio-

combining is the optimum combiner for 

independent AWGN channels. In this method, the diversity

 branches are weighted for maximum SNR as can be seen in

Figure 5 [9].

The Combiner output is given by

∑   ………..... (12) 

The SNR of the combined signal is

….……… (13)

5.2 Equal-Gain Combining Diversity (EGC  )

Various techniques are known to combine the signals

from multiple diversity branches. In Equal Gain

Combining,[10] each signal branch weighted with the samefactor, irrespective of the signal amplitude. However, co-

 phasing of all signals is needed to avoid signal cancellation.

In figure 5 each branch signal is rotated by , all branchsignals are then added.

The Combiner output is given by

∑ ……….… (14)

The SNR of the combined signal is

Γ = ∑

  .....……… (15)

VI.  RESULTS 

If we set the simulation environment for the OFDM basedwireless modulation, then we get the variable performance

for equalizers as well as for diversity techniques.

The following results have been obtained with the

considered combinations.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30

10-0.15

10-0.13

10-0.11

10-0.09

10-0.07

10-0.05

10-0.03

SNR in dB

   B   i   t   E   r

   r   o   r   R   a   t   e

   o   f   E   G

   C

BER with 'LS', 'MRC', 'ZF', 'EGC' with 512 Subchannels, 32 QAM and 1000 iterations

 

LS

MRC

ZF

EGC

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30

10-0.13

10-0.11

10

-0.09

10-0.07

10-0.05

10-0.03

SNR in dB

   B   i   t   E   r   r   o

   r   R

   a   t   e

   o   f   E   G

   C

BER with 'LS', 'MRC', 'ZF', 'EGC' with 256 Subchannels, 32 QAM and 1000 Iterations

 

LS

MRC

ZF

EGC

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30

10-0.16

10-0.14

10-0.12

10-0.1

10-0.08

10-0.06

10-0.04

10-0.02

SNR in dB

   B   i   t   E   r   r   o

   r   R   a   t   e

   o   f   E   G

   C

BER with 'LS', 'MRC', 'ZF', 'EGC' with 1024 subchannels, 32 QAM and 3000 iterations

 

LS

MRC

ZF

EGC

7/29/2019 BER performance improvement using fading techniques

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ber-performance-improvement-using-fading-techniques 4/5

 

164

International Journal of Electronics Communication and Computer Engineering

Volume 3, Issue 2, ISSN 2249 –071X

Copyright © 2012 IJECCE, All right reserved

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.

VII. CONCLUSION 

In this paper we have considered the maximum number 

equals 3000. We have also considered varying number of subchannels. The wireless communication without the

channel estimation results in high errors. Therefore

channel estimation is important to know the parameters of 

the channel and also to get the knowledge of affecting parameters. Without the channel estimation we can not

find the proper knowledge of the channel andimpairments.

If we look at the simulation result with 1024

subchannels and 1000 iterations, we find that the BER curve is becoming linear and therefore with high number 

of subcarriers and with 1000 iterations we get more better 

results compared to 256 and 512 subchannel conditions.Figure no.7, shows the effect of the

different equalizers and diversity techniques with the

2000 iterations and 1024 subchannels. Here we find the

results in the range of 0.1 to 0.001. But not a good

difference is seen here.

One thing is clear here that with lower order QAMmodulation techniques results are not much comparative,

 but results in bunching like the optimum performers.Only the change between performances can be seen with

lower number of subcarriers and with 1000 iterations.

Therefore we conclude with this assumption that with

more number of iterations and with the higher number of subchannels results can be improved but at the cast of high

simulation time. Finally with 1000 iterations we have

 better performance of used algorithms and MRC is verymuch able to show expected results and with less

complexity in achieving the better BER performance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT 

Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude

to my advisor Prof. Ravi Mohan for the continuous

support of my M.Tech study and research, for his patience,motivation, enthusiasm, and immense knowledge. His

guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing

of this thesis. I could not have imagined having a better advisor and mentor for my M.Tech study.

Besides my advisor, I would like to thank Prof. L. D.

Malviya for their encouragement, insightful comments,

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30

10-0.04

10-0.03

10-0.02

SNR in dB

   B   i   t   E

   r   r   o   r   R   a   t   e

   o   f   E   G

   C

BER with 'LS', 'MRC', 'ZF', 'EGC' with 64 subchannels, 32QAM and 1000 iterations

 

LS

MRC

ZF

EGC

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 3030

10-0.38

10-0.36

10-0.34

10-0.32

10-0.3

10-0.28

10-0.26

10-0.24

SNR in dB

   B   i   t   E   r

   r   o   r   R   a   t   e

   o   f   E   G

   C

BER with 'LS', 'MRC', 'ZF', 'EGC' with 64 Subchannels, 4 QAM, and 3000 iterations

 

LS

MRC

ZF

EGC

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30

10-0.38

10-0.36

10-0.34

10-0.32

10-0.3

10-0.28

10-0.26

10-0.24

SNR in dB

   B   i   t   E   r   r   o

   r   R   a   t   e

   o   f   E   G

   C

BER with 'LS', 'MRC', 'ZF', 'EGC' with 64 subchannels, 4 QAM and 1000 iterations

 

LS

MRC

ZF

EGC

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 3010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

SNR in dB

   B   i   t   E   r   r   o

   r   R   a   t   e

   o   f   E   G

   C

BER with 'LS', 'MRC', 'ZF', 'EGC' with 1024 Subchannels, 4 QAM and 2000 iterations

 

LS

MRC

ZF

EGC

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 3010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

SNR in dB

   B   i   t   E

   r   r   o   r   R   a   t   e

   o   f   E   G

   C

BER with 'LS', 'MRC', 'ZF', 'EGC' with 256 Subchannels, 4 QAM and 3000 iterations

 

LS

MRC

ZF

EGC

7/29/2019 BER performance improvement using fading techniques

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ber-performance-improvement-using-fading-techniques 5/5

 and hardthank my

spiritually

[1]  B. Y

for  para

Vol.

[2]  Y.LI

wire

chan

sept.

[3]  Yus

syste

[4]  ww

[5]  B.

syste

[6]  Theo

and

[7]  John

5th e

[8]  Hafe

wire

tech

[9]  A.

maxi

com

inter 

1463

[10]  Y. S

for E

Rayl

 pp. 8

 

AUTHO

 

uestions. Lastfamily &

throughout m

RE

ang.K.B. Letaief,

FDM transmissietric channel

49, no. 3, pp 467-

, J.H. Wintess, a

ess communicat

nel estimation,”IE

2002, pp. 1471–1

i Shen and Ed

ms’” January 200

.google.co.in

. Lathi, “Mode

ms“.

dore S. Rappapo

ractice,” 2nd Edit

G. Proakis and

dition

th Hourani, “A

ess communicat

ology.

hah and A.M.

mal ratio comb

ining for mobil

erence”, IEEE

, Jul 2000.

ng, S. D. Blostei

qual Gain Combi

eigh Fading,” IEE

65-870, Sept. 200

’S PROFILE 

DeepmDOB - 3rd I have co

communic

of technol

Master of 

Technolog

but not the ly friends

life.

FERENCES 

R.S. Cheng, Z. C

n in multipath f odeling,“ IEEE

478, march 2001.

d N.R. Sollenbe

ions, Signal de

EE Trans. Comm

477.

artine Z, “Chan

6.

rn Digital and

rt, “Wireless Co

ion.

asoud Salehi, “

overview of 

ion systems,”

Haimovich, “P

ining and com

radio communi

rans. Veh. Tech

and J. Cheng, “

ing EGC With C

E Trans. Wireless

3.

la Singh Pact. 1984 at Satna pleted my grad

tion engineering

ogy & science ,

engineering fro

, Jabalpur. 

o ri ht © 2

ast, I would lor supportin

ao,“ Channel esti

ding channels baTrans. Commun

ger “MIMO-OF

tection with en

nication, Vol. 50

el estimation in

analog Commu

munication, Pri

igital Communic

iversity techniq

elsinki Univers

rformance anal

arison with o

cations with coc

ol., vol. 49, pp.

xact Outage Pro

ochannel Interfer 

Commun., vol. 2

rihar 

ation in electro

from Vindhya i

Satna, Now p

Shri Ram Insti

Internation

012 IJECCE,

ke tome

mation

sed oncation,

M for 

hanced

, no. 9,

FDM

ication

nciples

ations,

es in

ity of 

sis of 

timum

hannel

1454-

ability

nce in

, no. 5,

ics &

stitute

rsuing

tute of 

l Journal of Ele

ll ri ht reserv

tronics Commu

V

ed

ication and Co

olume 3, Issue 2,

165

puter Engineeri

ISSN 2249 –071

g

X