bergische universität wuppertal peter gerlach building pixel detector modules in multi chip module...
TRANSCRIPT
Bergische Universität WuppertalPeter Gerlach
Building Pixel Detector Modules in Multi Chip Module Deposited Technology
IEEE Nuclear Science SymposiumRoma Oct.2004
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
2
Originally…
Christian GrahNow at Desy Zeuthen(Berlin, Germany)
…this talk should havebeen given by my colleagueChristian Grah.
Here you can see, how he looks like, at least.
But if you would have met him during the last years, he probably looked as shown on the right picture!
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
3
Subject of this talk
Application of a ‘thin’ film technology on a high energy physics detector.
Hybrid pixel detector (ATLAS, LHC, CERN)DefinitionGeometrical constrains
Thin film technologyExplanation of the processTypical dimensions
Introduce some prototypes build,gaining from a strong support of
The ATLAS pixel detector projectFraunhofer Institute IZM (Berlin, Germany)
Structures realisedResults optained
Laboratory and test-beam environment
Summary (How to…)
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
4
Hybrid Pixel Detector
Three parts:Sensor
High quality silicon waferPiN structureSegmentation into ‘pixels’
Readout ElectronicsInterconnection
Sizes for e.g. ATLAS Pixel:Module 2x6cm²16 readout chips~50.000 pixels à 50x400µm
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
5
Interconnect via Kapton-foil
3D designnote control chip and components on top
>500 wire-bonds per moduleSensor has to cover gaps in electronics
FE FE
SensorInterconnect„ATLAS Flex“
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
6
Interconnect integrated
FE FE
SensorInterconnect
„ATLAS MCM-D“
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
7
MultiChipModule-Deposited Technology
Spin-On BCB (Benzocyclobuthen)
Photolithographic structuring/exposure
Developing and stripping of unexposed BCB (soft-cure)
Sputtering of Cu – plating base layer
Spin-On and structuring of Photo-Resist
Electroplating of Cu – layer
Stripping of Photo-Resist and etching of plating base
Spin-On next BCB layer ( h) = a) )
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
8
MCM-D wafer after processing
10cm
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
9
MCM-D structures
contact to signal bus system
contact for Probecard(process monitoring)
contact to power distribution system
pixel matrix - feedthroughs
Different scales!
75µm75µm
50µm
500µm
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
10
MCM-D Module Prototype
MCC
readout chips
VBias (backside)
NTC, capacitors and LVDS
termination
Kapton flex circuit
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
11
MCM-D, geometry
Up to 5 copper layers:magnetron sputtered up to 300 nm Ti:W/Cuadditive electroplatingup to 3 m Cu
Minimal width 15µm spacing 15µmFinal metallisation:
5m Cu/200nm Au5m Cu/Ni/200nm Au
“Spin-on” polymer: BCB (Benzocyclobutene / DOW:CYCLOTENE™)
PhotosensitiveSpecific dielectric constantr= 2.7Process temperatures :
1h 220C per layerlast layer 1h 250 C
Thickness / layer 2 - 6 mVia >22 m, Pad >25µm
conductor layers dielectric layers
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
12
MCM-D Module Prototype
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
13
Geometrically Optimized Pixel Sensor
conventional sensor layout:(inter-chip region)
optimized sensor layout (Equal-sized Bricked):
drawn: sensor layout, top metal layer special thx to Tilman Rohe
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
14
Routing structures
200µm20µm
50µm BCB is etched for visualisation(except of some pillars)
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
15
Equal - Sized - Bricked single chip assembly: distribution of threshold
0 320 640 960 1280 1600 1920 2240 2560 28800
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Equal Sized Bricked Design
Schw
elle
[e- ]
Kanal (Spalte*160+Reihe)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 40000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Chi^2/DoF = 146.42943R^2 = 0.99766 xc 2085.66048 ±0.88028w 159.01999 ±1.66184
Ein
träg
e/B
inSchwelle [e-]
Equal Sized Bricked Design
threshold / e-
thre
shold
/ e
-
Counts
per
bin
Pixel number
No influence of the thin film structures, nor the bricked sensor structure visible
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
16
Equal - Sized - Bricked single chip assembly: distribution of noise
0 320 640 960 1280 1600 1920 2240 2560 28800
100
200
300
400
Equal Sized Bricked Design Standard Sensor Design
Rau
sche
n [e
- ]
Kanal (Spalte*160+Reihe)
0 100 200 300 4000
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
EQB:
1= 184.68 ±0.51
1= 36.01 ±1.06
Standard:
2= 180.85 ±0.76
2= 36.69 ±1.63
Equal Sized Bricked Design Standard Sensor Design
Ein
träg
e/bi
n
Rauschen [e-]ENC / e-
EN
C /
e-
Counts
per
bin
Pixel number
No influence of the thin film structures, nor the bricked sensor structure visible
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
17
Testbeam data
H8 Testbeam at SPS (CERN)
primary: 450 GeV protons
Data was mainly taken with:180 GeV pionsTelescope with 4 x 2 layers of strip-detectors (Strip pitch: 50 µm)
H8 Telescope system
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
18
Charge collection of equal sized bricked base-cell
Charge collectionvery uniformwith expected behaviour of bias grid contacts
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
19
Charge collection forsingle, double and triple hits
Slight charge deficitof double hits is dueto high threshold(chosen by mistake).
This fits to the expected/seen numberof triple hits.
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
20
Summary
nicehigher manageability and better handling of a modulebump bonds only (no wire-bonding)sensor cell geometry can be optimizedreduced assembly stepsrework of full assembled module possible (detach and reattach of chips)options of final metallization (Cu/CuNi/CuAu/CuNiAu/PbSn) allow different technologieshigher degree of automation during production
not so niceincreased size (but reduced height)lower testability (reduced access to inter-chip signals)high complexity of the process (find vendor)
Experience with MCMD
successfully operated a radhard pixel detector MCMD moduleperformance compatible with Flex modulesCooling ok (chip up design)successfully increased thin film yield
defect tolerant design with reduced "critical" area
high demand on cleanliness (includes new machinery and optimization of process flow)
20.Oct. 2004 NSS Roma 2004; P.Gerlach (Ch.Grah);Multi Chip Module Deposited
21
How to build MCMD Modules:
Sensor:1 module per 4” wafersensor dedicated for MCMD (including dicing streets and 1cm rim)Make use of geometrical optimizations!
Electronics:Known good die problem of Multi-Chip Moduleis relaxed by the reworking optionprototyping restrictions: changes in pin-out are expensive (money and time)!thinning: depending on the interconnection technique (reflow)thin chips get bowed during heating up
Thin Film Design:defect tolerant design recommendedset of design rules has been developed
Metal-lines: 15/15um; Via 22umLayer number vs. effort is not linear!
Thin Film Processing:automation <=> cleanlinessindustry keeps increasing wafer size
NO PROBLEM for MCM-D, but4 inch wafer (Sensors) processing might become a problem