berkeley board fellows & social sector solutions professional development workshop
TRANSCRIPT
Agenda
3:00 – 3:10 Welcome
3:10 – 3:30 Dynamic Board Lessons
3:30 – 3:45 LinkedIn For Good
• Nonprofit Resources
3:45 – 4:00 Speed Networking
4:00 – 4:45 The Intersection of Finance & Strategy:
Using Financial Data to Inform
Strategic Decisions
4:45 – 5:00 Wrap Up
2
Boards and Directors have Legal Duties of
Care, Loyalty and Obedience
3
Duty of
care
Duty of
loyalty
• An obligation to act in good faith
– with best interests of nonprofit
in mind – with such care of a
reasonably prudent person
• Be informed e.g.
– Attend meetings regularly
– Seek and review necessary information
• Exercise independent judgment
– Ask questions – avoid simply going along with
other directors
– Rely only on judgment of dependable sources
• An obligation to keep
confidences of nonprofit and
avoid actions that benefit self at
expense of nonprofit
• Avoid self-dealing transactions
• Where directors’ firm provides services
or products to nonprofit, make conflict known
to board, recuse self from discussions/votes
Duty of
obedience
• Required directors to comply with
applicable laws, adhere to
bylaws and remain guardians of
the mission
• Understand mission and bylaws
• Ensure regulatory filings completed
• Require operation audit and policy review
Hold public benefit corporation “in trust” for the community
Types of Boards
Organizing Board– small, homogeneous, informal – committed to purpose– Very hands on to support start up
Governing Board– larger and more diverse board– committees become important– shared authority between board and staff: board chair and
executive director are principal leaders– transition to governing board takes at least 3 years and a lot of
staff time
Institutional Board– very large (35-60 or more)– prestigious -- includes large donors or those with access to funders– accepts significant responsibility for fundraising– often delegates some governance to executive committee
4
Creating a Dynamic Board
• Monitor external and
internal environment to
prioritize areas for
Board attention
• Ensure quality
performance across 3
primary Board roles
• Develop a set of enabling
practices around Board
composition, size
structure, processes, and
staff relationships
Monitor and improve performance
Environment
Enablers
5
9 Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards
Monitor and improve performance
• Select, evaluate
and develop CEO
• Ensure adequate
financial
resources
• Lend expertise;
provide access to
people
• Protect/enhance
reputation of
organization
• Oversee financial management, ensure
appropriate risk management
• Monitor performance, ensure accountability
• Improve board performance
• Shape, clarify
mission and
vision
• Engage actively
in strategic
decision making
and policy
decisions
6
The Governance Gap
• 97% said that a high-performing board was important to a high-performing
nonprofit...
— However, only 19% said they were tapping their boards’ full potential
• 94% felt that their boards provide the appropriate level of strategic guidance…
— However, only 46% thought that their directors would be able to summarize both
the mission and the vision of their organizations
• 77% of respondents indicated a desire to improve board fundraising, but…
— Just 21% set individual board member fundraising goals
— Just 38% provided fundraising training
— Moreover, a mere 16% reported having individual board members receive formal
feedback on their performance at a regular interval
• Source: McKinsey survey of social services organizations
7
Board Performance GPA
0 1 2 3 4
Fundraising
Increasing diversity
Community relations
Strategic planning
Monitoring performance
Knowledge of programs
Supporting CEO
Legal/ethical oversight
Financial oversight
Understanding mission
Director view
CEO view
Source: Boardsource Nonprofit Governance Index 2010
Survey response to “give your board a letter grade” on each dimension
8
6 Enablers are Key to Closing Execution Gap
1. Working on the right things at the right time
2. Effective board leadership must drive for a true
partnership at board and committee level
3. A trust-based relationship with CEO as an
underlying foundation
4. Sweating the details on process is critical to
board function and engagement
5. Composition requires needs-based
management and a graceful transition mindset
6. Size and structure are a balancing act but must
ensure coverage of 9 responsibilities 9
Self Assessment Is Critical
Select, evaluate
and develop CEO
1 Poor 2 Average
3 Good
4 Distinctive
Succession planning Board has no clear succession plan Board has informal discussion
with CEO on succession and on
identifying candidates before
need for a CEO transition arises
Board has explicit view on
succession and works with CEO to
identify internal candidates with
leadership potential
Board has explicit view on succession and actively works with the CEO to identify internal candidates and provide development opportunities for the top 3-5
candidates to “round out” their
skills
Evaluation and development process
Evaluations are subjective and occur on ad-hoc basis; most board members are unaware of process or feedback messages
Evaluations performed annually against preagreed criteria; board members have opportunity to provide input to process
Evaluations performed formally and annually against pre-negotiated goals; written feedback messages are reinforced through CEO compensation
Evaluations performed at
annually against predefined
gooals; evaluation includes 360-
degree feedback and includes a
self-assessment by the CEO.
Written feedback includes skill
development plan. CEO
compensation decision
reinforces view of performance
10
Importance Ratings Vary Greatly by Organization
Q: Over the next one to two years, how important is it for your Board to focus on:
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3Low HighMedium
Rated Importance
Group Average Group Response Range
1. Clarifying the organization’s mission
or vision
2. Resolving key strategic or policy
issues
3. Developing CEO capabilities
4. Developing financial resources to
support strategy
5. Providing expertise or access to
support organizational priorities
6. Building the reputation of the
organization with key stakeholders
8. Assessing performance against
mission and key program priorities
7. Overseeing financies and ensuring
adequate risk management
9. Improving Board performance
Ensure Leadership
and Resources
Monitor and Improve
Performance
Shape Mission and
Strategic Direction
11
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2
Dynamic Boards Set Priorities Based on
Need and Performance
12
Relative Performance (ratio vs average response)
Rela
tive P
riority
(ra
tio v
savera
ge) Change Maintain
Quick fix only Reduce effort
Ensure Resources
Improve Board Performance
Shape M/V
Enhance reputation
Monitor org
performance
Provide expertise and accessShape strategy
Develop CEO Oversee
financial
performance
• Roles Matter: There are 9 clearly defined responsibilities of a nonprofit board,
with a gold standard of performance for each. Increasing emphasis on:
• Multi-year planning
• Performance measurement and accountability
• Risk management
• Sweat the Enablers: Good governance is in the execution
• Pay attention to the enablers of execution, including the small stuff
• Board Chair as CGO
• Understand and address the “human” aspects of director interests and
styles
• Pick Your Battles: There are lots of ways boards, as entities and directors as
individuals, can help. Pick your spots carefully to allot valuable time where
needed most
• Look in the Mirror: Invest significant time in board evaluation and continuous
improvement
Summary Take-Aways
13