bernstein 1997

Upload: anonymous-zmh82tymdt

Post on 06-Jul-2018

239 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 Bernstein 1997

    1/9

    Validity of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in an

    Adolescent Psychiatric Population

    DAVID P. BER NSTEIN, PH.D., TARUN A AHLUVALIA, B.A., DAVID P OG GE , PH.D.,

    A N D LEONARD HANDELSMAN, M.D.

    ABSTRACT

    Objective: To present initial findings on the validity of a recently developed maltreatment inventory, the Childhood

    Trauma Questionnaire CTQ), in a sample of adolescent psychiatric patients. Method: Three hundred ninety-eight male

    and female adolescents aged

    12

    to

    17

    years) admitted to the inpatient service of a private psychiatric hospital were

    given the CTQ as part of a larger test battery. Structured interviews were also conducted with the primary therapists

    of 190 of the patients to obtain ratings of abuse and neglect based on all available data, including clinical interviews

    with patients and their relatives and information from referring clinicians and agencies. Results: Principal-components

    analysis of the CTQ items yielded five rotated factors-emotional abuse, emotional neglect, sexual abuse, physical

    abuse, and physical neglect--closely replicating the factor structure in an earlier study of adult patients. The internal

    consistency of the CTQ factors was extremely high both in the entire sample and in every subgroup examined. When

    CTQ factor scores were compared with therapists’ ratings in a series of logistic regression analyses, relationships

    between the two sets of variables were highly specific, supporting the convergent and discriminant validity of the CTQ.

    Finally, when therapists’ ratings were used as the validity criterion, the CTQ exhibited good sensitivity for all forms of

    maltreatment, and satisfactory or better levels of specificity. Conclusions: These initial findings suggest that the CTQ

    is a sensitive and valid screening questionnaire or childhood trauma in an adolescent psychiatric inpatient setting.

    J

    Am.

    Ac ad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 1997,36 3):340-348.

    Key Words:

    abuse, neglect, adolescence, assessment, validity.

    Recent studies suggest that childhood trauma and

    deprivation are common but frequently underreported

    problems among adolescents seen in mental health,

    social service, and juvenile justice settings (Cavaiola

    and Schiff, 1988; Dembo et al., 1988; Edwall et al.,

    1989; Sansonnet-Hayden et al., 1987). Adolescents

    Accepted August 15, 1996

    Dr. Bernstein is Assistant Profissor of Psychiaty, Mount Sinai School

    o f

    Medicine, Ne w York, and Director of Clini cal Research, Bronx Veterans Affa irs

    Medical C enter? Drug D ependency T reatment Program. Ms. Ahluvalia is a

    Doctoral Candidate at Fairleigb Dirkinson University, RutheTford, NJ. Dr.

    P o a e

    is Director of Psychology at Four Wi nds Hospital, Ketonah, N Y ,

    and Assistant Profissor in the Psychology Department, Fairleigh Dirkinson

    University. Dr. Handelsman is Associate Profissor of Psycbiaty, Mo unt Sinai

    School of Medicine an d Director, Bronx Veterans Affairs M edical Center:

    Drug Dependency Tre atm ent Program.

    A version

    of

    this paper was presented at the Fou rth Intern ation al Research

    Confirenre on Family Violence, Durham , N H , July I995

    Reprint requests to Dr. Bernstein, Brow VA Medical Center, Psychiatry

    Service 116A, 130

    W

    Kingsbridge Road, Bronx, N Y

    10468.

    0890-8567/97/3603-0340$03.00/001997 by the American Academy

    of

    Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

    referred for reasons such as substance abuse, delin-

    quency, suicide attempts, sexual “acting-out,’’ and run-

    ning away from home often have histories of

    maltreatment (Cavaiola and Schiff, 1988; Dembo et

    al., 1988; Edwall et al., 1989; Sansonnet-Hayden et

    al., 1987), but these may not be disclosed during the

    course of routine evaluation. The early identification

    of such cases is essential, so that interventions can be

    made before the consequences of childhood trauma

    become chronic. However, until recently, few system-

    atic methods for assessing maltreatment in adolescence

    have been available and the validation of these measures

    has been limited (Dembo et al., 1988; Sanders and

    Giolas, 1991). In this report, we present initial findings

    on the validity of a recently developed measure for

    assessing maltreatment, the Chi ldhood Trauma Ques-

    tionnaire (CTQ), in a large, demographically diverse

    sample of adolescent psychiatric inpatients.

    The CTQ is a 70-item self-report inventory that

    provides brief and relatively noninvasive screening of

    maltreatment experiences before the age of 18 years.

    340

    J . AM. ACAD. CH ILD ADOLESC. PSYCHIATRY,

    3 6 ~ 3 ,

    MARCH 1997

  • 8/18/2019 Bernstein 1997

    2/9

    V A L I D I T Y

    OF

    T H E C T Q I N A D O LE S CE N T S

    In studies of adu lt substance abusers, the CTQdemon-

    strated excellent test-retest reliability over a 2- to

    6-month interval as well as convergence with a struc-

    tured trauma interview (Bernstein et al., 1994; Fink

    et al.,

    1995).

    Principal-components analysis

    (PCA)

    of

    the scale yielded four rotated factors which were labeled

    physical and em otional abuse, emotion al neglect, sexual

    abuse, and physical neglect (Bernstein et al., 1994).

    In the present study, our goal was to validate the

    CTQ in a psychiatric population of adolescents aged

    12 to

    17

    years. Specifically, we sought to replicate

    and extend our original factor-analytic findings in an

    adolescent sample and compare patients’ reports on

    the CTQ to ratings of maltreatment made by their

    primary therapists after discharge, based on all available

    data at that time. In the absence of a true “gold

    standard,” we selected therapists’ ratings as our validity

    criterion because the therapists had extensive contact

    with the patients and their families, other members

    of the multidisciplinary treatment team, and other

    inform ants such referring clinicians and agencies; more-

    over, therapists were often able to support their judg-

    ments with independent evidence such as knowledge

    of child welfare investigations, appearances in family

    or criminal court, or removal of the child from the

    parental home.

    METHOD

    Subjects

    Thre e hundr ed ninety-eight adolescents adm itted to the inpatient

    service of a private psychiatric hospital were given the CTQ as

    part of a larger test battery. Therapists’ ratings of maltreatment

    were

    also obtained for

    190

    of the adolescent patients. Patients

    were heterogeneous with regard

    to

    age (range =

    12

    to

    17

    years,

    mean

    SD

    =

    14.9 1.4

    years), gender (males

    = 43%, n

    =

    171;

    females

    =

    57%, n

    =

    227),

    and ethnic composition (white

    =

    67.9%,

    Hispanic =

    13.3%,

    African-American =

    11.2%).

    Patients also

    represented a broad range of family income, from middle- and

    upper-income families with private health insurance to families in

    poverty (patients with Medicaid coverage

    =

    51%).

    The most

    frequent presenting psychiatric problems among the patients were

    suicide risk,

    48.9%

    (male

    = 42.9%,

    female

    = 53.3%,

    x

    = 4.19,

    df = 1,

    p

    < .05);

    substance abuse,

    37.8%

    (male

    = 41.%,

    female

    =

    34.8%,

    x

    =

    1.98,

    df

    1 , p

    > . I ) ;

    moo d disorders,

    35.2%

    (male

    =

    33.5%,

    female

    = 36.4%, x

    =

    0.36, df = 1,

    p

    >

    . I ) ; suicide

    attempts,

    33.4%

    (male

    = 23.5%,

    female

    = 40.9%, z = 13.12,

    df 1,

    p

    < .001);

    self-mutilation,

    22.8%

    (male =

    l8.8%,

    female =

    25.9%, x

    =

    2.74, df

    =

    1,

    p

    < .l);

    homicide risk,

    21.3%

    (male =

    28.2%,

    female =

    16.1%, x = 8.53, d f 1,

    p

    < .01);

    assault,

    20.3%

    (male

    = 31.2%,

    female

    = 12.1?40,

    x

    = 21.84, df 1,

    p

    <

    .001);

    criminal behavior,

    18.3%

    (male =

    27.1%,

    female =

    11.6%,

    x =

    15.45, df 1.p < .001);

    learning disabilities,

    15.5%

    (male

    =

    18.8%,

    female =

    12.9%,

    x =

    2.55, df 1,

    p

    > . l ) ;

    and attention

    deficit disorder,

    14.2%

    (male

    = 21.8%,

    female

    = 8.5%,

    x

    13.98,

    df =

    1,

    <

    .001).

    Patients were excluded from the study if

    low intelligence (Wechsler Full S ca le I Q

  • 8/18/2019 Bernstein 1997

    3/9

    B E R N S T E I N E T AL.

    These terms were reviewed until

    it

    was clear that the therapist

    and interviewer were operating from a common definition; discus-

    sions with the therapists were limited to clarifying definitional

    issues and did not include discussion of specific case material. Each

    case from the CTQ respondent pool treated by that therapist

    was then individually reviewed and rated. Identifying information

    (name, age, dates of hospitalization) was presented to the therapist

    along with a copy of the therapist’s own adm ission note, discharge

    summary, and psychosocial history taken from the patient’s hospital

    chart. H aving been thus refamiliarized with the case, the therapist

    was asked to rate whether the patient had been sexually, physically,

    or

    emotionally abuse,

    or

    neglected, according to the standardized

    definitions. For each of the four categories, the therapist was asked

    to rate the patient as “definitely”

    or

    “definitely not” maltreated,

    or

    as “uncertain.” Therapists were instructed

    to

    base their ratings

    on all information available to them, including statements of

    patients and their relatives, information provided by referring

    clinicians and agencies, and other records. Therapists were also

    allowed to draw freely on information obtained by other mem bers

    of the multidisciplinary treatment team and were encouraged to

    exercise their clinical judgm ent. How ever, therapists were also

    strongly encouraged to assign to the “uncertain” category any case

    for which they felt less than entirely certain about the patient’s

    abuse

    or neglect status. Thus, while some cases assigned to the

    uncertain gr oup m ay in fact have been victims of abuse

    or

    neglect,

    those assigned to the definitely

    or

    definitely not abused

    or

    neglected

    groups were considered unambiguous cases.

    To

    determine whether therapists were able to apply the mal-

    treatment definitions in a uniform manner,

    two

    therapists, a clinical

    psychologist and a clinical social worker, were presented with 10

    case vignettes. All vignettes were based on real cases that had been

    abstracted from patients’ clinical charts and incorpo rated as many

    relevant details as possible, including some that were ambiguous

    or

    contradictory (e.g., abuse allegations that were later recanted).

    Some vignettes combined material from different cases in order

    to provide a sufficient pool of maltreatment experiences of different

    types. T h e therapists w ere asked to review the standardized defini-

    tions and rate each vignette in terms of the presence

    or

    absence

    of four types of maltreatment: physical, sexual, and emotional

    abuse and physical neglect. Their ratings were compared w ith those

    of a senior clinician with expertise in the maltre atmen t area (D .P.B.).

    Mean values for agreement between the raters and the expert

    were extremely high: physical abuse,

    =

    .9; sexual abuse, =

    1.0;

    emotional abuse, = .9; and physical neglect, = .9.

    Once cases were assigned to the definitely abused

    or

    neglected

    category, specific detailed information was gathered concerning

    dura tion, age of occurrence, nature and severity of abuse

    or

    neglect,

    identity of the perpetrators, and medical and legal consequences

    of the maltreatment. A gain, therapists were encouraged to respond

    by using the “uncertain” category if the information sought was

    in any way incomplete

    or ambiguous.

    Table 1 indicates that the therapists were often able to cite

    independent corroborative data to support their judgments about

    patients’ maltreatment status, such as knowledge of C hild Protective

    Service investigations, crimin al

    or

    family co urt chargeslappearances,

    prior psychiatric

    or

    medical care for trauma-related problems,

    or

    removal of the child from the parental home.

    Procedures

    T h e

    CTQ

    was given approximately

    1

    week after admission as

    part of a clinical psychological test battery that included a variety

    T BLE 1

    Percentage of Maltreatment Cases in Which

    Therapists Cited Independent Evidence to Support Their

    Ratings of Abuse and Neglect

    Percent

    n)

    of Cases Supported

    by Independent Data“

    Sexual Physical Physical

    Abuse Abuse Neglect

    n

    = 43)

    YZ 61) ( n = 41)

    CPS report 39.5 (17)

    50.8 (31) 51.2 (21)

    Criminal court 20.9 (9)

    3.3 (2)

    0.0 0)

    Family court

    16.3 (7) 18.0 (11)

    22.0 (9)

    Psychiatric care

    32.6 (14)

    31.1 (19) 48.8 (20)

    Medical care N A

    14.8 (9) N A

    Removal from home 14.0 (6) 31.1 (19)

    43.9 (18)

    Any of the above 62.8 (27) 67.7 (42)

    75.6 (31)

    Chil d Protective Service (CPS) investigation; criminal

    or

    family

    court appearance; patient received prior psychiatric

    or

    medical care

    for consequences of abuse

    or

    neglect; patient removed from home.

    N A

    =

    information not available.

    of self-administered questio nnaire s, as well as the WISC-I11 (Psycho-

    logical Corporation, 1991) and the WRAT-111 (Wilkinson, 1993).

    Approximately

    25%

    of patients admitted to the hospital were not

    given the C T Q , either because low intelligence (Wechsler Full

    S ca le I Q

  • 8/18/2019 Bernstein 1997

    4/9

    VALI DI TY

    OF

    T H E C T Q IN A D O L E SC E N TS

    CTQ

    (e.g., test report summaries) were excluded from this review.

    Interviews could not be conducted with the therapists of the

    remaining patients because the therapists were no longer available.

    No differences were found between adolescents with and without

    therapist ratings on age, gender,

    or

    ethniciry or on any of the

    CTQ factors, except for a small bu t significant difference in physical

    abuse scores (patients with therapist ratings

    =

    14.5 ? 8.0, patients

    without therapist ratings = 12.5

    ?

    6.1;

    t =

    .84, df 296,p < .01).

    Statistics

    The factorial structure of the CTQ was investigated by PCA

    with varimax rotation. Separate PCAs in males and females pro-

    duced nearly identical results,

    so

    subsequent analyses were per-

    formed using the combined sample. Seven items were excluded

    from the PCA: a three-item validity scale and four items with very

    low communalities (multiple R

    <

    .2) with the other CTQ items.

    The validity scale, which was designed to detect maltreatment

    underreporting, is described elsewhere (D. Bernstein, H. Jelley, L.

    Handelsman, unpublished). Four-, five-, and six-factor solutions

    were attempted and the five-factor solution was chosen because of

    its evident content validiry (in the four-factor solution, items

    reflecting physical and emotional abuse loaded highly on a single

    large factor, while in the six-cluster solution, the physical neglect

    items were dispersed among two small factors). Items were assigned

    to the single factor on which they loaded most highly (all items

    had factor loadings equal to

    or

    greater than

    .4

    on at least one

    factor). Internal consistency reliability of the CTQ factors was

    determined by Cronbach’s a

    Scoring algorithms for the CTQ were based on analyses of five

    separate normative samples, including the adolescents described

    here, representing a broad range of age, gender, income, ethnicity,

    and diagnosis (total N 979)

    (D.

    Bernstein, unpublished study).

    Although an extensive discussion of algorithm development is

    beyond the scope of this report, a brief summary is as follows.

    Items were first assigned to factors based on their loadings in two

    independent factor-analytic studies. Although an initial study of

    adult substance abusers resulted in a four-factor solution (Bernstein

    et al., 1994), the five-factor solution reported here in which physical

    and emotional abuse items loaded on separate factors was preferred

    for its face validity. An effort was then made to reduce the total

    number of items with the goal of producing a shorter version of

    the scale. Item-factor correlations and Cronbach’s a

    values (i.e.,

    internal consistency reliabilities) were examined across the five

    validation samples and items were either dropped

    or

    retained

    depending on their performance. This resulted in a final set of

    algorithms consisting of 50 total items, in addition to the three-

    item validity scale: emotional abuse, 12 items; physical abuse, 7

    items; sexual abuse, 7 items; emotional neglect, 16 items; and

    physical neglect,

    8

    items. Scores on the five factors are obtained

    by taking the sum of the unweighted item raw scores.

    T o examine the convergence between CTQ scores and therapists’

    ratings of maltreatment, a series of logistic regression analyses was

    performed in which the five CTQ factors were entered simultane-

    The sensitivity and specificity of the CTQ factors for therapists’

    ratings of abuse and neglect were determined using statistical

    sofnvare for nonparametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC)

    analysis (Vida, 1993). ROC analysis calculates the sensitivity and

    specificity

    of

    a scale for every possible cutoff score, allowing the

    investigator to select the test threshold that yields the best balance

    of false-negative and false-positive errors

    for

    his

    or

    her purposes

    (Hsiao et al., 1989; Mossman and Somoza, 1991). As the CTQ

    is intended as a screening measure, we were more concerned with

    minimizing false-negative errors (i.e., the nondetection of true

    cases) than false-positive errors. Furthermore, noncases of childhood

    maltreatment are almost impossible to verify definitively (Briere,

    1992), suggesting that criterion variables like therapists’ ratings are

    likely to produce false-negative errors of their own, leading to

    underestimates

    of

    the true specificity of trauma questionnaires. For

    these reasons,

    o u r

    cutoff scores for the CTQ were set to emphasize

    test sensitivity over specificity.

    RESULTS

    A PCA of the CTQ items was performed to examine

    the factor structure of the questionnaire. PCA yielded

    five rotated factors, accounting together for 55 of

    the variance between items (Table

    2).

    The five factors

    were interpreted as emotional abuse, emotional neglect,

    sexual abuse, physical abuse, and physical neglect,

    closely replicating the findings of a previous study in

    adult substance abusers (Bernstein et al., 1994). The

    factors were highly internally consistent, both in the

    sample as a whole and in separate subsamples of males

    and females and younger and older adolescents (Table

    2).

    Intercorrelations among the five factors ranged from

    r = .34 to r = .75 with a median of r = .51 (Table 2).

    When therapists were asked to rate the presence or

    absence of maltreatment in a subsample of 190 adoles-

    cent patients, 23 of patients n = 43) were classified

    as definitely sexually abused, 33 n= 6 2 ) as physically

    abused, 33

    ( n

    = 6 2 ) as emotionally abused, and 22

    n

    =

    41)

    as physically neglected. Fifty-six percent of

    the subsample n = 107) were judged to have at least

    one form of childhood trauma, while 39 n = 7 3 )

    received ratings of two or more forms of trauma.

    Point-biserial correlations between CTQ factor

    scores and therapist interview ratings showed that de-

    ously and therapists’ ratings

    of

    the presence or absence of mal-

    spite substantial overlap between different forms of

    treatment were used as the (dichotomous) dependent variables. An maltreatment , convergent correlations (e.g., correla-

    additional series of logistic regressions was performed in which

    variables were entered hierarchically in sets, with gender entered tions between CTQ factor

    and

    thera-

    first, the

    CTQ

    factors second, and the interactions between gender pist ratings) were in general larger than discriminant

    and the CTQ factors third. Cases that were rated as “uncertain”

    correlations (i.e., correlations between CTQ factor

    were excluded from all of these analyses (12 cases of sexual abuse,

    9

    cases of physical abuse,

    9

    cases of emotional abuse, and

    5

    cases “Ores

    and nonanalogous

    therapist

    3)*

    of neglect).

    T o examine further the specificity of the relationship

    J A M . A C A D . C H I L D A D O L E S C . P S Y CH I A T R Y , 3 6 : 3 , M A R C H

    1 9 9 7 343

  • 8/18/2019 Bernstein 1997

    5/9

    B E R N S T E I N

    ET AL

    TABLE

    Factor Structure and Internal Consistency of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ in 398

    Male and Female Adolescent Psychiatric Patients

    Eigen- Percent Reliability (Cronbach's

    a)d

    CTQ Factor Itemsb Mean (SD)' value Variance Male Female 12-14 yr 15-17 yr Total

    I. Emotional abuse

    17 42.1 (17.2) 21.9

    34.8

    .94 .95 .95 .95 .95

    11. Emotional neglect

    22 52.8 (19.5)

    4.8 7.6 .95 .94 .94 .95 .94

    111. Sexual abuse

    7 11.3 (7.3) 3.7

    5.8

    .87 .92 .90 .92 .9

    1

    IV. Physical abuse

    7 13.4 (7.1)

    2.4

    3.9

    .89

    .91 3 0 .9 1 .90

    V. Physical neglect 10 16.8 (6.9) 1.9 3.0 .80 .82 .80 .82 .8 1

    Total scale 63 136.5 (47.0) 55.1 .96 .97 .96 .97

    .97

    Intercorrelations among factors: emotional abuse with emotional neglect,

    r =

    .62, sexual abuse,

    r =

    .43, physical abuse,

    r

    = .77, physical

    neglect,

    r

    = .56, emotional neglect with sexual abuse, r = .33, physical abuse, r = .49, physical neglect, r = .50, sexual abuse with physical

    abuse, r = .43, physical neglect, r = .43, physical abuse with physial neglect, r = .55, all correlations, p < .001.

    tems loading greater than

    .4

    based on principal-components analysis; items assigned to single factor with highest loading.

    'Sum of unweighted raw item scores.

    dSample sizes for reliability analyses: males, n = 171; females,

    n

    = 227; 12- to 14-year-olds, n

    =

    148; 15- to 17-year-olds, n = 247;

    entire sample,

    n

    =

    398.

    between CTQ scores and therapists' maltreatment rat-

    ings, a series of logistic regression analyses was per-

    formed with the five CTQ factors entered

    simultaneously and each form of maltreatment rated

    by the therapists serving in tu rn as a separate depend ent

    variable. These analyses indicated that the relationship

    between CTQ factors an d analogo us therapists' ratings

    was highly specific (Table 3). When therapists' ratings

    of the presence or absence of sexual abuse were used

    as the depend ent measure, only the CTQ sexual abuse

    factor made a unique positive contribution to the

    logistic regression model, as indicated by a significant

    odds ratio; moreover, CTQ physical neglect was in-

    versely related to therapists' ratings of sexual abuse.

    Similarly, therapists' ratings of physical abuse were

    uniquely predicted by the C TQ 's physical abuse factor.

    Therapists' ratings of emotional abuse were positively

    associated with the CTQ's physical abuse and emo-

    tional abuse factors

    (the latter at a trend level of

    significance), while sh owing a negative association with

    the physical neglect factor. Finally, therapists' ratings

    of physical neglect were associated only with the CT Q' s

    physical and emotional neglect factors. Thus, when

    the CTQ factors were allowed to compete with one

    TABLE 3

    Relationship Between Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) Factors and Therapists' Maltreatment Ratings in Adolescent Psychiatric

    Patients: Correlational and Logistic Regression Analyses

    Therapists' Maltreatment Ratings

    Sexual Abuse Physical Abuse Emotional Abuse Physical Neglect

    CTQ

    Factors

    r

    Odds'

    r

    Oddsb

    r

    Oddsb

    r

    Oddsb

    Sexual abuse

    .72*** 1.37 '

    .22*** 0.98

    .24*** 1.02

    .27*** 1.04

    Physical abuse .27*** 1.03 .59 ** 1.21***

    .46***

    1.11 '

    .30 1.04

    Emotional abuse

    .32*** 1

    oo .49*** 1 oo .46***

    1.04'

    .28*** 0.96

    Physical neglect

    .20***

    0.84 ' .42*** 1.01

    .24*** 0.92**

    .42*** 1.13***

    Emotional neglect

    .16** 1.01 .37*** 1.01 .30*** 1.01

    .36 '* 1.03**

    Point-biserial correlations between CTQ factors and therapists' maltreatment ratings. Sexual abuse,

    n

    = 167; physical abuse,

    n

    = 169;

    emotional abuse, n = 169; physical neglect,

    n

    = 173.

    esults of logistic regression analyses. Odds greater than one indicate positive association between CTQ factors and therapists' ratings;

    odds less than one indicate negative (i.e., inverse) association. Sexual abuse, n = 167; physical abuse,

    n

    = 169; emotional abuse,

    n =

    169;

    physical neglect,

    n

    = 173.

    * p

    < . l ;

    * * p

    < .05;

    * * * p<

    .01.

    344 J . A M . A C A D . C H I L D A D O L E S C . P S Y C H I A T RY ,

    3 6 ~ 3 ,

    A R C H

    1997

  • 8/18/2019 Bernstein 1997

    6/9

    V A L I D I T Y

    OF THE CTQ

    I N A D O L E S CE N T S

    another in the same regression model, their correspon-

    dence with equivalent therapists’ ratings was quite

    precise. No significant interactions between gender

    and the CTQ factors were found, indicating that

    relationships between therapists’ ratings of mal-

    treatment and the CTQ factors were equivalent in

    male and female patients.

    ROC analysis was then used to determine the sensi-

    tivity and specificity of the CTQ factors at various test

    thresholds (i.e., cutoff scores), when therapists’ ratings

    of maltreatment were used as the criterion. These

    analyses indicated that the

    CTQ

    succeeded in detecting

    a high proportion of abused and neglected patients,

    based on therapists’ ratings, while keeping false-positive

    errors to acceptable levels (Table 4) . In keeping with

    the CTQ‘s intended purpose as a screening instrument,

    we selected the following cutoff scores to emphasize

    test sensitivity over specificity: sexual abuse, 9; physical

    abuse, 12; emotional abuse, 30; and physical neglect,

    12.

    When these respective cutoff scores were used, the

    CTQ‘s sexual abuse factor correctly classified more

    than four out of five sexually abused patients, based

    on therapists’ ratings, and about three out of four

    patients without sexual abuse. Similarly, the physical

    abuse factor correctly identified more than four fifths

    of physically abused patients and nearly three quarters

    of patients without physical abuse. The emotional

    abuse factor correctly classified nearly four fifths of

    emotionally abused patients and over seven out of ten

    patients without emotional abuse. Finally, the physical

    neglect factor correctly identified nearly four fifths of

    physically neglected patients and more than 6 out of

    10 patients without physical neglect. The area under

    the ROC curve was significant for all forms of mal-

    treatment we examined, indicating that the CTQ im-

    proved the likelihood of detecting true cases of abuse

    and neglect over that which would be expected by

    chance, given the base rates of these forms of trauma

    in the sample (Table 4) .

    When the CTQ factors were used to estimate the

    prevalence of maltreatment in the sample as a whole,

    39.0 of patients

    n =

    153) met the cutoff score for

    sexual abuse, 44.7 n = 178) for physical abuse,

    45.5 n= 180) for emotional abuse, and 48.9 n=

    194) for physical neglect; 71.9 n= 286)

    of

    patients

    met the cutoff score for at least one form of mal-

    treatment, and 5 1.3 a= 204) for two or more forms

    of maltreatment.

    A

    significantly greater proportion of

    female patients met

    CTQ

    cutoff scores for sexual abuse

    (female =

    47.8 ,

    male =

    27.4 , x

    =

    16.77,

    df = I ,

    p < .001)

    and emotional abuse (female

    =

    51.8 ,

    male

    =

    37.1 ,

    x =

    8.47,

    df =

    1

    p < . O l ,

    but rates

    TABLE 4

    Sensitivity and Specificity (With Confidence Intervals) of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ

    Factors for Therapists’ Ratings of Maltreatment in Adolescent Psychiatric Patients

    ~~

    Sexual Abuse“ Physical Abuseb Physical Neglect‘ Emotional Abused

    (Range = 7-35) (Range

    =

    7-35) (Range

    =

    8 4 0 ) (Range

    =

    12-60)

    Cut‘ Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity Cut f Sensitivity Specificity

    8

    9

    10

    1 1

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    3 6 (.71-.94) .68 (.59-.76) .97 (37 -.9 9)

    .86 (.71-.94)

    .76 (.67 -33 ) .94 (34 -.98 )

    3 4 ( .69-.93)

    .79 (.71- 36) .94 (34-. 98)

    .84 (.69-.93) .82 (.7 3-3 8)

    37

    (.76-.94)

    .79 (.64-39)

    .86 (.79-3 2) .82 (.70-.90)

    .79 (.64-39)

    .90 (.82-.94) .79 (.6 6-3 8)

    .77 (.61-38)

    .92 (.85-.96) .77 (.6 5- 37 )

    .74 (.59-.92) .92 (.85-.96)

    .74 (.61-34)

    .70 (.54-32) .94 (3 7- .9 7) .71 (.58-.81)

    .70

    (.54-32) .94 ( 3 8 - 3 8 ) .68 (.54-.79)

    .67 (.51-30)

    .96 (.90-.99) .61 (.48-.73)

    .35 (.26-.44)

    .48 (.39-.58)

    .59 (.49-.68)

    .64 (.54-.72)

    .73 (.63-.81)

    .77 (.68-34)

    .82 (.73-38)

    .84 (.75-.90)

    .85 (.77-.91)

    . 8 9 ( 3 - . 9 4 )

    . 8 9 ( 3 - . 9 4 )

    1.0 (.91-1.0)

    .95 (.82-.99)

    .93 (.79-.98)

    .80

    (.65-.91)

    .78 (.62-29)

    .68 (.52-31)

    .61 (.44-.75)

    .54 (.38-.69)

    .54 (.38-.69)

    .59 (.42-.73)

    .51

    (.35-.67)

    0.0 0.0-.03)

    .20 (.14-.29)

    .36 (.28-.44)

    .50 (.41-.58)

    .61 (.53-.70)

    .73 (.64-30)

    .78 (.70-34)

    .83 (.75-39)

    .87 (.80-.92)

    .90 (.83-.94)

    .91 (.85-.95)

    26 .87 (.76-.94)

    27 .84 (.72-.92)

    28 .79 ( .6 6 .8 8)

    29 .79 (.66 -38 )

    30

    . 79 ( .66 .88)

    31 .76 (.63-3 5)

    32 .74 (.61-.84)

    33

    .73 (.60-.83)

    34 .69 ( .5 6.8 0)

    35 .65 (.51-.76)

    36 .61 (.48-.73)

    .59 (.49-.68)

    .61 (.52-.70)

    .67 (.57-.76)

    .72 ( .62-2 0)

    .72 (.63-.80)

    .73 ( .64 .81)

    .75 (.66-33)

    .75 ( .66.83)

    .78 (.68-34)

    .78 (.69-235)

    .63 (.53-.72)

    ~ ~~~

    “T ru e positives =

    43,

    true negatives =

    124,

    area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

    =

    0.88

    (SE

    =

    0.04),

    z =

    8.10,

    ’True positives =

    6 2 ,

    true negatives =

    110,

    area under the ( ROC ) curve =

    0.85

    (SE = 0.03),

    z

    =

    7.72,

    p <

    .0001.

    ‘True positives =

    41,

    true negatives =

    135,

    area under the ( ROC ) curve = 0.78 (SE =

    0.04), z

    =

    5.37,

    p

    < .0001.

    dTrue positives =

    6 2 ,

    true negatives =

    109,

    area under the (ROC) curve =

    0.78

    (SE

    = 0.04), z = 6.17, p < .0001.

    ‘Cutoff scores for CTQ sexual abuse, physical abuse, and physical neglect factors.

    fCutoff scores

    for

    CTQ emotional abuse factor.

    p <

    .0001.

    J . A M . A C A D. C H I L D A D O L E S C . P S Y C H I A T R Y ,

    3 6 : 3 ,

    M A R C H 1 9 9 7

    345

  • 8/18/2019 Bernstein 1997

    7/9

    B E R N S T E I N E T AL

    of physical abuse and physical neglect did not differ

    between the two genders (physical abuse: female =

    48.0 , male = 40.4 , x = 2.32,

    df

    = 1, p > .1;

    physical neglect: female = 50.4 , male = 46.8 , x =

    0.52,

    df

    1,

    p

    >

    .1).

    DISCUSSION

    These findings replicate our previous factor-analytic

    results and provide initial support for the validity of

    the

    CTQ

    in an adolescent psychiatric population. PCA

    of the CTQ resulted in a five-factor solution nearly

    identical with that obtained in a sample of substance-

    abusing adults (Bernstein et al., 1994 ). T h e only excep-

    tion was that in the adolescents, physical and em otional

    abuse items loaded on separate factors, while in the

    adults, they loaded on a single factor. The internal

    consistency reliability of the

    CTQ

    factors was extremely

    high, both in the adolescent sample as a whole and

    in every subgroup we examined. Furthermore, when

    CTQ

    factor scores were compared with therapists’

    maltreatment ratings based on all available data, rela-

    tionships between the tw o sets of variables were highly

    specific, supporting the convergent and discriminant

    validity of the

    CTQ.

    Finally, when therapists’ ratings

    were used as the validating criterion, the CTQexhibited

    good sensitivity for all forms of maltreatment we exam-

    ined, along with satisfactory or better levels of specific-

    ity, suggesting that the CTQ is an effective screening

    measure for childhood trauma in an adolescent psychi-

    atric setting.

    These findings also add to a growing literature

    indicating a high prevalence of abuse and neglect in

    clinically referred adolescents. More than 50 of the

    sample were rated as abused

    or

    neglected by their

    therapists, and more than

    70%

    reported maltreatment

    on the questionnaire. T hese prevalence rates were com-

    parable with

    or

    greater than those reported in previous

    studies of similar populations (Cavaiola and Schiff,

    1988; De m bo et al., 1 988; Edwall et al., 1989; Sanson-

    net-Ha yden et al., 1 98 7). Cons istent with previous

    studies, we found that reports o f sexual abuse were more

    frequent among adolescent girls than boys (Finkelhor,

    19 94) . Adolescent girls were also more likely to report

    histories of emotional abuse; however, given the rarity

    with which emotional abuse has been assessed, further

    studies will be needed to replicate this gender difference

    in other adolescent samples.

    In this study, we used an “all data” validation

    strategy that capitalized on the fact that patients’ pri-

    mary therapists were privy to information from multiple

    sources, including in m any cases indepe nden t corrobo-

    rative data that could be used to support their judg-

    ments, such as knowledge of Child Protective Service

    investigations, court appearances, and removal of the

    child from the parental hom e. Furthermore, t he rather

    lengthy period of hospitalization (an average stay of 1

    to

    2

    months) gave therapists the chance to make

    extended observations of patients and their relatives

    and to develop a degree of rapport with patients in a

    sheltered setting that often fosters the disclosure of

    maltreatment. That therapists rarely made use of the

    “uncertain” rating category, even though they were

    repeatedly encouraged to do so, attests to their confi-

    dence in their judgments.

    Although

    our

    findings suggest that adolescents’ self-

    reports of childhood trauma are usually credible, in

    tha t they are consistent with therapists’ “best estimate”

    ratings, it will also be important to investigate the

    sources of both false-negative and false-positive re-

    porting errors. There is some evidence that response

    biases such as the need for social desirability and

    defense mechanisms such as repression may lead to

    the underreporting of maltreatment (Guenther and

    Frey, 1990; Joub ert, 199 1); on th e other hand , deliber-

    ately false allegations of abuse by adolescents, although

    apparently rare (Everson and Boat, 1 989 ), may produc e

    false-positive trau m a reports in some instances. T o

    address these issues, we are reviewing the records of o ur

    adolescent patients i n cases in which their questionn aire

    responses and therapists’ ratings differed, as well as

    comparing patients’

    CTQ responses to their profiles

    on the validity scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic

    Personality Inventory-2 (Ha thaw ay and M cKinley,

    198 9). These a nd similar studies should increase ou r

    understanding of the exceptional circumstances in

    which adolescents’ trauma reports may not be val-

    idly interpreted.

    These findings need to be considered in light of

    certain limitations. First, therapists’ maltreatment rat-

    ings do not constitute a “gold standard” in the true

    sense. Although therapists were kept blind to patients’

    CTQ responses, their ratings were not entirely inde-

    pendent, in that they were based in part o n information

    provided by the patient. Furthermore, therapists’ rat-

    ings themselves are subject to possible errors, because

    346

    J . A M . AC A D . C H I L D A D O L E S C . P S Y C H I A T R Y , 3 6 : 3 , M A R C H 1 9 9 7

  • 8/18/2019 Bernstein 1997

    8/9

    V A L I D I T Y

    OF

    T H E C T Q

    I N

    A D O L E S C E N T S

    corroborating suspected maltreatment cases can be

    diffi-

    cult, and definitively verifying noncases, nearly impossi-

    ble (Briere, 1992). Previous research suggests that the

    nondetection of true maltreatment cases (i.e., false

    negatives) is more common than the false detection

    of noncases (i.e., false positives) (Briere, 1992). Some

    true cases of abuse or neglect might therefore be

    detected by a questionnaire but be unknown to thera-

    pists, a misclassification that would underestimate the

    specificity of the test by misclassifying true-positive

    cases on the questionnaire as false positives. This might

    occur, for example, if some adolescents felt more com-

    fortable disclosing their maltreatment histories on a

    questionnaire than in a clinical interview or therapy

    session. In support of this view, many of the adolescents

    rated as “uncertain” by their therapists were classified

    as positive maltreatment cases by the

    CTQ 5

    of 11

    uncertain cases of sexual abuse, 7 of 9 uncertain cases

    of physical abuse, 6 of 9 uncertain cases of emotional

    abuse, and

    4

    of

    5

    uncertain cases of neglect. Estimates

    of the specificity of the CTQ given in this report are

    therefore best regarded as representing the lower limit

    of the true specificity of the questionnaire.

    Second, we could have used other approaches to

    validate the trauma histories obtained with the CTQ.

    For example, child welfare records could have been

    used as the validating criterion, rather than therapists’

    ratings. However, this strategy also has its limitations.

    For example, many cases of abuse and neglect never

    come to the attention of child welfare agencies (Fin-

    kelhor, 1994) and a variety of factors can affect the

    accuracy of Child Protective Service reports (Eckenrode

    et

    al., 1988). In fact, the corroboration of childhood

    trauma faces inherent difficulties, such as the passage

    of time and the secrecy often surrounding these experi-

    ences (Briere, 1992). An absolute means of verification

    (i.e., a true “gold standard”) is therefore rarely available.

    For this reason, we used an “all data” validation

    strategy, in which therapists were asked

    to pool

    informa-

    tion from multiple sources rather than relying on a

    single source of corroboration. However, studies using

    a variety of methodological approaches will be needed

    to fully address this complex issue.

    Third, the elapsed time between patients’ completion

    of the CTQ and administration of the therapist inter-

    views might have influenced our findings, although

    the direction

    of

    any possible effect is difficult to deter-

    mine. O n the one hand, certain cases may have appeared

    less ambiguous in hindsight than they

    did

    in vivo; on

    the other hand, the deterioration of memory over

    time may have produced greater ambiguity in case

    determination. Although we attempted to mitigate

    against such factors by providing therapists with copies

    of their own reports from the hospital charts, it is still

    conceivable that a shorter interval might have produced

    different results. Finally, our findings regarding sensitiv-

    ities, specificities, cutoff scores, and other results of

    the ROC analyses are most conservatively generalized

    to adolescent inpatient settings until they can be repli-

    cated in other groups of adolescent patients (e.g.,

    outpatients).

    Our findings support the use of the

    CTQ

    for both

    research and clinical purposes. Research on the causes

    and consequences of child abuse and neglect has often

    been hampered by unvalidated instruments (Briere,

    1992). Ou r validation of the

    CTQ

    using an operation-

    ally defined external criterion-therapists’ ratings that

    capitalized on all available data about the patient-

    should help provide a more solid methodological basis

    for maltreatment assessment in future research.

    As

    a clinical instrument, the

    CTQ

    provides rapid

    screening for history of child abuse and neglect. When

    used in conjunction with other available data, it may

    help to identify adolescents who, by virtue of their

    trauma histories, are at risk for developing a broad

    range of psychiatric symptoms and behavior problems,

    including posttraumatic stress disorder, addictions, de-

    pression, delinquency, and self-injurious behavior

    (Kendall-Tackett et al., 1993). Moreover, the scale

    gives clinicians a means of initiating a dialog with

    adolescents about sensitive topics that might otherwise

    go undisclosed. Querying adolescents about their ques-

    tionnaire responses during follow-up interviews or ther-

    apy sessions can lead to the disclosure of further details,

    such as the identity of perpetrators, victimization of

    other family members, and whether the reported mal-

    treatment was in the past or is still ongoing. Although

    clinicians should exercise caution regarding the poten-

    tially distressing nature of this material, allowing pa-

    tients to explore these issues at their own pace (Brooks,

    1985)) a discussion of adolescents’ questionnaire re-

    sponses may reveal important additional information

    about childhood events and open up a therapeutic

    dialog in which maltreatment experiences can begin

    to be explored.

    J .

    A M . A C A D . C H I L D A D O L E S C . P S Y C H IA T R Y , 3 6 : 3 , M A R C H 1997

    347

  • 8/18/2019 Bernstein 1997

    9/9

    B E R N S T E I N E T A L.

    As is the case for any psychological test, however,

    the CTQ is not a substitute for a clinician’s own

    judgment. The CTQ‘s proper clinical use is as a

    screening instrument;

    it

    is no t itself a “gold stan dar d’

    for assessing childhood trauma . Clinical judgm ent m ust

    therefore be used in interpreting responses to the

    questionn aire, taking i nto accou nt all available informa-

    tion about the patient. When used as part of an

    integrated evaluation procedure, the

    CTQ can provide

    informarion that may help clinicians make informed

    treatment decisions.

    In conclusion, research suggests that childhood mal-

    treatment is often underreported in clinical settings

    but that systematic assessments may increase rates of

    disclosure (Briere and Zaidi,

    1989).

    Adolescents may

    be reluctant to reveal such experiences in interviews

    or therapy sessions, not only because of feelings of

    shame and guilt, but also because of their need for

    autonomy and frequent ambivalence about authority

    (Erikson,

    1969).

    T h e CTQ offers adolescents the op-

    portunity to disclose traumatic experiences in a self-

    report format that may be congruent with their own

    needs for privacy. O u r findings suggest tha t it is a

    sensitive and valid means

    of

    screening adolescents for

    a history of childhood maltreatment.

    REFERENCES

    Bernstein D, Fink L, Handelsman L et al. (1994), Initial reliability and

    validity of a new retrospective m easure

    of

    child abuse and neglect. Am

    / Prychiatry 151:1132-1136

    Briere J (1992),Methodological issues in the study

    of

    sexual abuse effects.

    J

    Consult Clin Prychol60:196-203

    Briere J, Zaidi L (1989), Sexual abuse histories and sequelae in female

    psychiatric emergency room patients.

    Am Prychiany 146:1602-1606

    Brooks B (1985),Sexually abused children a nd adolescent identity develop-

    ment. A m Psychother 39:401-410

    Cavaiola A, Schiff M (1988),Behavioral sequelae of physical and /or sexual

    abuse in adolescents. Child Abuse Negl12:181-188

    Dembo R, Dertke M, Borders

    S,

    Washburn M , Schmeidler J (1988), T h e

    relationship between physical and sexual abuse and tobacco, alcohol,

    and illicit drug use among youths in a juvenile detention center. / n t

    /Addict 23:351-378

    Eckenrode J, Powers J, Doris J et al. (1988),Substantiation of child abuse

    and neglect reports. Consult Clin Psychol56:9-16

    Edwall G, Hoffmann N, Harrison

    P

    (1989), Psychological correlates

    of

    sexual abuse in adolescent girls in chemical dependency treatment.

    Adolescence 24:279-288

    Erikson E (1969), Identity: Youth and Cririr. New York: WW Norton

    Everson M, Boat B (1989), False allegations of sexual abuse by children

    and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Prychiatry 28:230-235

    Fink L, Bernstein D, Handelsman L, Foote

    J,

    Lovejoy

    M

    (1995), Initial

    reliability and validity

    of

    the Childhood Trauma Interview: a new

    multidimensional measure of childhood interpersonal trauma. Am

    Prychiatry 152:1329-1335

    Finkelhor D (1994),Current information o n the scope and nature

    of

    child

    sexual abuse. The Future of Children 4(2):31-53

    Guen ther RK, Frey C (l990),Recollecting events associated with victimiza-

    tion.

    Pryrho1

    Rep 67:207-217

    Hathaway SR, McKinley J C (l989), Minnesota Multiphasic Personality

    Inventory- Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

    Hsiao JK, Bartko JJ, Porter WZ (1989), Diagnosing diagnoses: receiver

    operating characteristic methods and psychiatry. Arch Gen Prychiany

    46664-667

    Jouber t C (1991), Self-esteem an d social desirability in relation

    co

    ollege

    students’ retrospective perceptions

    of

    parental fairness and disciplinary

    practices. Prychol Rep 69:115-120

    Kendall-Tackett

    K

    Williams L, Finkelhor D (1993), Impact

    of

    sexual

    abuse on children: a review and synthesis of recent empirical studies.

    Prychol

    Bull 113:164-180

    Mossman D, Somoza

    E

    (l991), R O C curves, test accuracy, and the

    description of diagnostic tests. Neuroprychiatry Clin Neurosci330-333

    Psychological Corporation (1991), Wechsler Intelligence Scale

    j r

    Children-

    Third Edition. New York: Psychological Corporation

    Sanders B, Giolas M

    (1991),

    Dissociation and childhood trauma in psycho-

    logically disturbed adolescents. Am Prychiany 148:50-53

    Sansonnet-Hayden H, Haley

    G,

    Marriage K Fine S (1987), Sexual abuse

    and psychopathology in hospitalized adolescents. / Am Acad Child

    Adolesr Prychiany 26:753-757

    Vida

    S

    (1993),A com puter program

    for

    non-parametric receiver operating

    characteristic analysis. Comput Method Progfams Biomed 40:95-101

    Wilkinson GS (l993), Wide Range Achievement Test-Version III . Wilming-

    ton, DE: Wide Range Inc

    348

    J . A M . A C A D . C H I L D A D O L E S C . P S Y C HI A T R Y ,

    3 6 ~ 3 ,

    A R C H

    1 9 9 7