best practice response -project estimating framework
TRANSCRIPT
Best Practice Response - Project Estimating FrameworkBRIEFING NUMBER THREECheryl Nelms, P.Eng, Ph.D.GENERAL MANAGER, PROJECT DELIVERY
GVWD Board Meeting: November 27, 202042464512
Section E 2.1
Greater Vancouver Water District
2
Agenda
• Introduction to Cost Estimating
• Best Practice Framework
• Next Steps
PHOTO: NORTH SHORE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Greater Vancouver Water District
3
Cost Estimating
Prediction of the costs of a project from inception to project completion
Prediction is based on evaluating uncertain circumstances
PHOTO: LULU ISLANDGreater Vancouver Water District
4
Impacts of Poor Estimating Practices
Cost overrun and scope creep
Requirement for significant budget revisions during
execution
Multiple requests for funding
Poorly informed decision making
Inability to reconcile budget changes over
time
Limited lessons learnt from one project to the
next
POOR ESTIMATING PRACTICE
PHOTO: LULU ISLANDGreater Vancouver Water District
5
Cost Estimating Objectives
Improves decision making as a project is advanced through its various stages
Improves cost certainty and cost management
PHOTO: IONA WWTPGreater Vancouver Water District
7
Project Estimating Best Practices
Consistent guidelinesthroughout the project
lifecycle
Standardized costcategorization
Formalized cost & scope stage gate
process
Internal database used for benchmarking and knowledge transfer
PHOTO: IONA WWTP Greater Vancouver Water District
8
1. Cost Categorization
Base Design & Construction Costs
Owner’s Cost
Risk Reserve
Escalation
• Design & Construction cost estimates
• D&C estimate uncertainty contingency
• Time/inflation based cost increases estimating using project specific construction indices and schedule
• Specific reserve to account for risks retained by Metro Vancouver (E.g. geotechnical risk)
• Based on standardized risk review process
TotalProject
Contingency
• MV staff, owner advisors, site acquisition, permitting, procurement, legal costs
• Owner’s costs estimate uncertainty contingency
Greater Vancouver Water District
1. Cost Categorization: Procurement Options Analysis
9
Greater Responsibility
Limited Responsibility
Shared Responsibility
LegendRISK ALLOCATION CATEGORIES DBB DBF
Contractor Owner Contractor Owner Changes in regulations ● ● ● ●Owner initiated changes ● ● ● ●Achieving schedule ● ● ● ●Design functionality ● ● ● ●Construction costs ● ● ● ●Commissioning & Acceptance ● ● ● ●
-5
0 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Values in Millions ($)
DBB
Mean $14,295,52490% $21,095,958
DB
Mean $11,249,54690% $17,621,085
Greater Vancouver Water District
2. Guidelines: Steps for Each Project Stage
• 10+ years timeline for execution of large capital projects
• Estimate requirements and guidance provided at each project stage
• Use of AACE Estimate class, well understood by engineering industry
10
Expected Accuracy Range
* Class 1-5 is equivalent to Class A-EGreater Vancouver Water District
12
3. Stage Gate Process: Internal Review
Detailed Guideline - Standardized Cost Categorization
Definition Design Construction Closeout
Level of Development • Need identified• Screening level
business case• Conceptual design• Options analysis
• Preliminary design• Detailed design• Bottom-up estimate
• Construction • Completion of contractual obligations
Key Project EstimatingDeliverables
Screening level business case
Project estimate Class 4/5
Project estimate Class 3 Value Engineering (max
impact at 30% design) Authorization for expenditure
Class 2/1estimates for key contracts
Preparation and Issue of Project Completion Report
Close authorization for expenditure
Gate Gate Gate Gate
Greater Vancouver Water District
Next Steps• Create Project Controls Group
• Formalize internal practice and guidelines
• Develop training for project estimation
• Implement best practices on Metro Vancouver large capital projects
• Develop internal database as fourth pillar for benchmarking and knowledge transfer
13 ONA WWTPGreater Vancouver Water District