beyond compliance - a holistic approach to web accessibility

21
UKOLN is supported by: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility Brian Kelly UK Web Focus UKOLN University of Bath Bath, UK http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/ conferences/techshare-2007/ This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 2.0 licence (but note caveat) Acceptable Use Policy Recording/broadcasting of this talk, taking photographs, discussing the content using email, instant messaging, blogs, SMS, etc. is permitted providing distractions to others is minimised. Resources bookmarked using ‘techshare-2007' tag

Upload: cetis-university-of-bolton

Post on 18-Dec-2014

1.362 views

Category:

Technology


2 download

DESCRIPTION

A talk on "Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility" given at the Techshare 2007 conference. See http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/conferences/techshare-2007/

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

UKOLN is supported by:

Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

Brian KellyUK Web FocusUKOLNUniversity of BathBath, UK

http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/conferences/techshare-2007/http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/conferences/techshare-2007/

This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 licence (but note caveat)

Acceptable Use PolicyRecording/broadcasting of this talk, taking photographs, discussing the content using email, instant messaging, blogs, SMS, etc. is permitted providing distractions to others is minimised.

Acceptable Use PolicyRecording/broadcasting of this talk, taking photographs, discussing the content using email, instant messaging, blogs, SMS, etc. is permitted providing distractions to others is minimised.

Resources bookmarked using ‘techshare-2007' tag Resources bookmarked using ‘techshare-2007' tag

Page 2: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

2

About This Paper

This paper describes work carried our by various accessibility researchers in the UK:

• Reviews limitations of WAI approach to Web applicability (described at W4A 2005)

• Describes holistic approach for e-learning accessibility (described at W4A 2006)

• Applies previous work to new ‘edge case’ of culture on the Web (described at W4A 2007)

• Introduces a Stakeholder Model to help ensure sustainability of approaches to accessibility

• Compares old and new approaches to Web accessibility

• Proposes ‘Accessibility 2.0’ as term to describe approach which builds on WAI’s successes

Page 3: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

3

W4A 2005: Reprise

At W4A 2005 we presented “Forcing Standardization or Accommodating Diversity…”:

• The practical difficulties of using a “standard” to encapsulate design requirements to accommodate a diverse set of needs under a diverse set of circumstances and contexts

• The achievements and limitations of WCAG in supporting this

• The resultant difficulties (and absurdities) from legislation and policy – that makes inappropriate reference to WCAG

• Using the example of the e-learning sector we pointed the way to a more holistic view of Web accessibility

We received many positive comments on the ideas we presented

WAI’s Limitations

Page 4: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

4

Limitations of the WAI Model

• WAI model relies on conformant Web sites, conformant authoring tools, conformant user agents

• …and conformant users!• A common complaint of “standardistas” – “the

user needs to take responsibility…”• There is value in this argument – but there are

practical shortcomings• And user technophobia/laziness/lethargy is only

one obstacle How many users know they are “disabled”?

WAI’s Limitations

Also note importance of evidence-based research. Various UK accessibility studies seem to find that lack of evidence of accessibility of Web sites for PWDs and conformance with WCAG guidelines!

Also note importance of evidence-based research. Various UK accessibility studies seem to find that lack of evidence of accessibility of Web sites for PWDs and conformance with WCAG guidelines!

Page 5: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

5

The SiteMorse Simplicities

SiteMorse’s automated tool showed poor WCAG compliance across several well-known UK disability organisations.

The responses from the disability organisations belittled the findings of automated tools and give a much greater emphasis of testing by users.

TechDis News Item, Jan 2005

WebExact (Bobby) shows problems

WAI’s Limitations

If disability bodies find compliance with guidelines difficult does this mean:

• They don’t care about accessibility• Accessibility is hard & costly• The guidelines have flaws

(and note legal ramifications if an inaccessible Web site cites such data in their defence)

If disability bodies find compliance with guidelines difficult does this mean:

• They don’t care about accessibility• Accessibility is hard & costly• The guidelines have flaws

(and note legal ramifications if an inaccessible Web site cites such data in their defence)

Page 6: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

6

The Importance of Context

• We argue Web accessibility is about supporting users achieve real world goals

• From Beyer & Holzblatt (1998) – the more you know about your target audience the more you can design to support them

• So the goal of “universal accessibility” has changed to supporting a defined set of users in the best possible way…

• How can we use WCAG to achieve this?

WAI’s Limitations

Note in the UK ‘widening participation’ seems to be preferred to ‘universal accessibility’ – with the latter sometimes leading to universal inaccessibility (“we can’t use JavaScript so we’ll not allow anyone to gain benefits it can provide” )

Note in the UK ‘widening participation’ seems to be preferred to ‘universal accessibility’ – with the latter sometimes leading to universal inaccessibility (“we can’t use JavaScript so we’ll not allow anyone to gain benefits it can provide” )

Page 7: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

7

Holistic Approach

Follow-up work awarded prize for Best Research Paper at ALT-C 2005 E-learning conference

Follow-up work awarded prize for Best Research Paper at ALT-C 2005 E-learning conference

This approach reflects emphasis in UK on blended learning (rather than e-learning)

Kelly, Phipps & Swift developed a blended approach to e-learning accessibility

This approach:• Focusses on the needs

of the learner• Requires accessible

learning outcomes, not necessarily e-learning resources

Holistic Approach

Page 8: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

8

Application To Culture

Accessibility for information / factual resources is easy(ish)Accessibility for edge cases including learning, culture, research, gaming, communications, assertion of identity (teenagers on MySpace), …:

• More challenging • Needed to allow providers of Web-based

cultural services to enhance accessibility• Generic model will provide broader

framework for variety of Web uses

Holistic Approach

Page 9: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

9

Universal Accessibility?

Normal Cancer Man against snow, Austrian Tirol 1974, reproduced with permission of the photographer: Professor Paul Hill

The Great Masturbator by Salvador Dali (1929)

The Duck-RabbitCRAFT BREWERY

Holistic Approach

Page 10: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

10

Articulating the ApproachThe "Tangram Metaphor“ (Sloan et al, W4A 2006) developed to avoid checklist / automated approach:

• W3C model has limitations• Jigsaw model implies

single solution• Tangram model seeks to

avoid such problems

This approach:• Encourages developers

to think about a diversity of solutions

• Focus on 'pleasure' it provides to user

This approach:• Encourages developers

to think about a diversity of solutions

• Focus on 'pleasure' it provides to user

Holistic Approach

Page 11: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

11

Tangram Model & Testability

Baseline 1

Testable

"WCAG 2.0 success criteria are written as testable statements …" (nb. automated & human testing )Issues:

• What about WCAG principles that don't have defined success criteria (e.g. "content must be understandable")?

• What about 'baselines' – context only known locally• What about differing models or / definitions of 'accessibility'?

Note vendors of accessibility testing services will market WCAG tools e.g. see posting on BSI PAS 78Tangram model can be used within WCAG

• Distinguish between testable (ALT tags) and subjective (content understandable)

• Supports baselines• Discussions with developers on

prioritisation of automated testing

Holistic Approach

Page 12: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

12

Tangram Model

Note that similar moves to modularity are the norm in many W3C standards

Note that similar moves to modularity are the norm in many W3C standards

Model allows us to:• Focuses on end solution rather

than individual components• Provided solutions tailored for

end user• Doesn't limit scope (can you

do better than WAI AAA?)• Use automated checking – but

ensures emphasis is on user satisfaction

Guidelines/standards for/from:

• WAI• Usability• Organisational• Dyslexic • Learning difficulties• Legal• Management

(resources, …)• Interoperability (e.g.

HTML validity)• Accessibility metadata• Mobile Web• …

Page 13: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

13

Stakeholder ModelCommon approach:

• Focus on Web author • Sometimes user involved• Sometimes led by policy-makers

This approach:• Often results in lack of

sustainability• Web accessibility regarded as

‘techie’• Not integrated with wider

accessibility issues• Not integrated with training,

development, …• Priorities not negotiated with others

There’s a need to integrate approaches to accessibility more closely with (diversity of) service providers

Page 14: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

14

Repositories – Case StudyDiscussion on repositories list:

“Why PDFs of research papers? What about accessibility?”“Important battle is open access. Let’s not add extra complexities.”

My response:Open access is important (and PDF is easy) but let’s also:

• Engage with various stakeholders (incl. publishers)

• Develop (holistic) policies• Explore other options to

enhance accessibilityAnd I found Scribd – a Web 2.0 services which creates MP3 from MS Word/PDF:

• Enhanced accessibility from MS Word master & Flash interface

Page 15: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

15

The Cathedral & The Bazaar 2.0

Traditional WAI Approach Proposed Approach

E-learning Blended learning

Centralised Devolved

Single solution Variety of solutions

Slow-moving Rapid response

Remote testing Testing in context

IT solution Blended solutions

Objective testing Context to testing

Medical model Social model

Accessibility as a thing Accessibility as a process

Clear destination (AAA) Focus on the journey

Accessibility as a cathedral Accessibility as a bazaar

Page 16: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

16

Accessibility 2.0

Need to build on WAI’s successes, whilst articulating a more sophisticated approach. Accessibility 2.0:

• User-focussed: It’s about satisfying user’s needs• Rich set of stakeholders: More than the author

and the user• Always beta: Accessibility is hard, so we’re

continually learning• Flexibility: There’s not a single solution for all use

cases• Diversity: There’s also diversity in society’s views

on accessibility (e.g. widening participation, not universal accessibility)

• Blended solutions: Focus on ‘accessibility’ and not just ‘Web accessibility’

Page 17: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

17

The Legal Framework

This approach is well-suited for the UK legal framework:

SENDA/DDA legislation requires "organisations to take reasonable measures to ensure people with disabilities are not discriminated against unfairly"

Note that the legislation is:• Technologically neutral• Backwards and forwards compatible• Avoids version control complexities• The legislation also covers usability, as well as

accessibility

Other country’s legislation also talks about ‘reasonable measures’

Other country’s legislation also talks about ‘reasonable measures’

Page 18: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

18

Our Next Steps

Accessibility Summit II:• Held at JISC TechDis offices, York in Nov 2006• 19 invited accessibility researchers, practitioners &

policy makers in HE, public sector & disability support organisations

• Agreement on various concerns of WAI’s approach• Recommendation to develop roadmap: more

research, evidence-gathering, engagement, …

Museums and Web 2007 Professional Forum:• 50+ participants at international conference in April• Further agreement on need to build richer

approaches to accessibility for cultural heritage orgs• Accessibility 2.0 term added to Museums Wiki

Page 19: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

19

The Good News

Our approaches have helped inform WCAG 2.0 developmentsWCAG 2.0:

• Technology neutral • Based on four key principles (normative) (POUR):

Perceivable Operable Understandable Robust

• Separate (informative) guidelines for HTML• Reflects out holistic approaches

The challenges:• Providing a context outside of the principles

e.g. “Super Cali go ballistic, Celtic are atrocious”• Testing in context • Commissioning

Page 20: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

20

Conclusions

To conclude:• WAI has provided a valuable starting point• Need to develop a richer underlying model • Need for Web accessibility to be placed in

wider content• There's a need to an evidence-based

approach and less ideology• Contextual approach & tangram metaphor

aim to help inform such developments• Accessibility 2.0 term can articulate a

renewed approach

Page 21: Beyond Compliance - A Holistic Approach to Web Accessibility

21

Questions

Questions are welcome