bhopal slides

Upload: vipin-kishore

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Bhopal Slides

    1/6

    International Dimensions of Ethics

    Adopted from The Bhopal Plant Disaster, IDEESE Case Study Series, 2008 IDEESE

    Case Study:

    The Bhopal Plant Disaster

    Massive toxic gas leak from Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL)

    chemical plant at Bhopal in December, 1984.

    Thousands killed and hundreds of thousands injured by 40 ton

    release of methyl isocyanate (MIC).

    Caused by unsafe conditions and series of failures in poorly

    maintained and understaffed plant.

  • 8/3/2019 Bhopal Slides

    2/6

    International Dimensions of Ethics

    Adopted from The Bhopal Plant Disaster, IDEESE Case Study Series, 2008 IDEESE

    Some Context:

    The Bhopal Plant

    Built in late 1960s to process pesticides

    Expanded in 1970s to add production capability

    Production cut in 1980s due to market forces and decision to sell plant

    Ownership and Operation Union Carbide owned controlling share (50.9%) of UCIL

    Plant managed and staffed locally by UCIL

    Climate

    Plant initially welcomed at Bhopal for its economic potential

    Located 2 miles from city center; surrounding population expandedsignificantly between construction and disaster

    Government classified plant as general (not hazardous ) industry in

    1976, even after approving MIC-based processes at plant and

    establishing a hazardous industry zone 15 miles from city

  • 8/3/2019 Bhopal Slides

    3/6

    International Dimensions of Ethics

    Adopted from The Bhopal Plant Disaster, IDEESE Case Study Series, 2008 IDEESE

    The Disaster: Contributing Factors

    Human Error Critical isolation valve not closed before pipes were flushed with water,

    causing the fatal pressurization of tank containing MIC.

    Flare for flame neutralization of escaping gas was shut down

    Inadequate Safety Equipment Reach of sprayer forwater neutralization of escaping gas was

    inadequate. Plant managers were aware of deficiency.

    Flare system lacked capacity for major gas leak.

    Failure of Safety Equipment Stack scrubber, activated by operator during leak, failed.

    PoorMaintenance Tank refrigerators inoperable; had been drained of freon

    Blockage in pipes meant to drain water that pressurized tank

  • 8/3/2019 Bhopal Slides

    4/6

    International Dimensions of Ethics

    Adopted from The Bhopal Plant Disaster, IDEESE Case Study Series, 2008 IDEESE

    The Disaster: Contributing Factors (cont.)

    Inadequate Staffing Union-Carbide-trained supervisors had left Bhopal by 1984

    Staffing in MIC unit had been cut below half of recommended level

    Second-shift maintenance supervisor position eliminated weeks beforedisaster

    Lack of Evacuation Plans Visiting Union Carbide engineers repeatedly stressed need for a plan to

    alert and evacuate population in the event of a gas leak

    UCIL claimed to have developed such plans

    City and state officials claimed no knowledge of such plans

    Inadequate Response Warning siren activated upon leak, but only for a few minutes

    Public response panicked , evacuation slow and uncoordinated

    Response of medical workers hampered by lack of info about MIC

  • 8/3/2019 Bhopal Slides

    5/6

    International Dimensions of Ethics

    Adopted from The Bhopal Plant Disaster, IDEESE Case Study Series, 2008 IDEESE

    Ethical Dimensions: Discussion

    What are the ethical dimensions of the Bhopal case?

    Who are the stakeholders, and what were their ethicalresponsibilities?

    Which ethical dimensions arise from, or are complicated

    by,

    the international nature of the case?

    Consider international dimensions via

  • 8/3/2019 Bhopal Slides

    6/6

    International Dimensions of Ethics

    Adopted from The Bhopal Plant Disaster, IDEESE Case Study Series, 2008 IDEESE

    Analysis of International Dimensions

    Recall Framework

    Apply ethics prevailing in the society where activity

    occurs no matterwho does it.

    Apply ethics of own society to all activities of its

    members wherever the activity occurs

    Develop ethical principles and rules common to all

    societies where the scientific or engineering work

    occurs.