bibliography - shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.inshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/13606/... ·...

@ 2010. Konchok Tashi Bibliography

188

Bibliography

Aarts, Bas. (2005). Conceptions of categorization in the history of linguistics. In

Language Sciences 28 (2006). Elsevier Ltd, 361-385.

Abbi, Anvita. (1994). Semantic universals in Indian languages. Shimla: Indian

Institute of Advanced Study, Rashtrapati Nivas.

Allerton, D.J. (1979). Essentials of Grammatical Theory: A Consensus View of

Syntax and Morphology. London: Rougtledge and Kegan Paul.

Allwood, J., Gardenfors, P. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and

Cognition. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, PA.

Alm-Arvius, C. (1993). The English Verb See: A Study in Multiple Meaning.

Goteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitas Gothoburgensis.

Alm-Arvius, Christina. (2005). Types of polysemy variation. English Department.

Stockholm University, Sweden.

Apresjan, J.D. (1973). Regular Polysemy. In Linguistics, 142: 5-32.

Austin, J.L. (1961). Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baker, M.C. (2003). Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge

Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bakula Rangdol Nima. (2005). A Ladakhi Grammar. Cultural Preservation &

Promotion Society, Achinathang, Leh (Ladakh).


189

Baldinger, Kurt. (1980). Semantic Theory towards a modern semantics. Basil

Blackwell. Oxford.

Barcelona, A. (1997). Clarifying and Applying the Notions of Metaphor and

Metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics. Atlantis XIX.1: 21-48.

Barcelona, Antonio (ed.). (2003). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads.

New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Barcelona, Antonio. (2001). On the systematic contrastive analysis of conceptual

metaphors: case studies and proposed methodology. In Putz, Martin,

Susanne Niemeier and Rene Dirven (eds.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics

II: Language Pedagogy. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Barcelona, Antonio. (2003). Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: An Analysis and

a Few Modest Proposal. In Cuyckens, Hubert, Thomas Berg, Rene Dirven

and Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in Language.

Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Barcelona, Antonio. (2003a). Introduction. The cognitive theory of metaphor and

metonymy. In Barcelona, Antonio (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the

Crossroads. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Barcelona, Antonio. (2003b). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic

motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Barcelona, Antonio (ed.),

Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin, New York: Mouton

de Gruyter.


190

Bauer, J. (1949). Die Ausdrucke fur ‘schauen’ in den Mundarten Italiens und der

Sudschweiz (nach dem AIS). Erlangen.

Bechtel, F. (1879). Uber die Bezeichnungen der sinnlichen Wahrnehmungen in

den indogermanischen Sprachen. Ein Britrag zur Bedeutungsgeschichte.

Weimer.

Beretta, Alan, Fiorentino, Robert and Poeppel, David. (2005). The effects of

homonymy and polysemy on lexical access. An MEG study. Department of

Linguistics. Machigan State University, A-628 Wells Hall, East Lansing,

MI 48824 USA.

Best, J.B. (1992). Cognitive Psychology (third edition). West Publishing

Company, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Bhatrihari. (AD 450). Vaakyapadiya (dealing with the philosophy of grammar).

Bilkova, Ilona. (2000). Czech and English Idioms of Body Parts: A view from

Cognitive Semantics. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Glasgow.

Blutner, R. (1998a). Lexical pragmatics. Journal of Semantics, 15: 115-162.

Boers, F. (1996). Sptail Prepositions and Metaphor. A Cogntive Semantic Journey

along the UP-DOWN and the FRONT-BACK Dimensions. Tubingen:

Gunter Narr Verlag.

Boers, Frank. (1999). When a bodily Source Domain Becomes Prominent: The

Joy of counting Metaphors in the Socio-Economic domain. In Gibbs,

Raymond W. Jr. and Gerard J. Steenn (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive


191

Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing

Company.

Boguraev, B.K. (1979). Automatic Resolution of Word-Sense Ambiguity. Ph.D.

thesis, Cambridge University.

Bohnemeyer, J. (2004). When Going means Becoming Gone: Framing Motion as

State Change in Yukatek. Session “The Expression of PATH in the

languages of the Americas” at the 2004 Annual Meeting of SSILA, Boston,

MA, January 8011.

Briscoe, E.J., Copestake, A.A., & Boguraev, B.K. (1990). Enjoy the paper: lexical

semantics via lexicology. In COLING 90, Vol. 2: 42-47 Helsinki.

Brugman, C. (1981). The Story of Over. MA thesis. University of California at

Berkeley. Distributed by L.A.U.T. July 1993. Series A. Paper Nr. 102.

Brugman, C. (1988). The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of

the Lexicon. New York: Garland.

Buck, C.D. (1949). A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-

European Languages. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Byrd, R.J. (1989). Discovering relationships among word senses. In Dictionaries

in the Electronic Age: Proc. Fifth Ann. Conf. of the UW Centre for the

New OED, 67-80 Oxford.

Cadierno, Teresa. (2004). Expressing Motion events in a second Language: a

Cognitive Typological Perspective. In Achard, Michel and Susanne


192

Niemeier (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and

Foreign Language Teaching. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Cann, Ronnie. (1993). Formal Semantics: An introduction. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Caplan, D. (1973). A note on the abstract readings of verbs of perception.

Cognition 2.3: 269-77.

Caramaza, A., Grober, E. (1976). Polysemy and the structure of the subjective

lexicon. In Georgetown University Round Table on Language and

Linguistics, 1976 (C. Rameh, ed.), 181-206. Georgetown University Press,

Washington, DC.

Casad, H. Eugene (ed.) (1996). Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The

Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics. New York: Mouton de

Gruyter Berlin.

Census Report. 2001. Census of India.

Chapell, Hilary and William McGregor (eds.). (1996). The grammar of

Inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the part-

whole relation. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Charles, W.G. (1988a). Categorization of contextual information. Ph.D. Dept. of

Psychology, Princeton University.

Chatterjee, A. (1994). Understanding Vagueness. Delhi: Pragata Publications,

Delhi.


193

Chen, Zelin. (1989). Zang xiang (Theory of internal organs). In Jin, Wentao (ed.),

Jiating Yixue Quanshu (Family Medicine). Shaghai Science and

Technology Press, Shanghai, 1003-1012.

Chierchia, G. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1990). Meaning and Grammar. An

Introduction to Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Chowdury, Bakul Chandra. (1974). M.A. dissertation on Segmental Phonemes of

Ladakhi.

Coleman, L., and Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English verb ‘lie’,

Language, 57.1.

Copestake, A., Briscoe, T. (1996). Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension.

In Lexical semantics: The problem of polysemy (J. Pustejovsky and B.

Boguraev, eds.), 15-67. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Copestake, A.A. & Briscoe, E.J. (1991). Lexical operations in a unification-based

framework. In Pustejovsky, J. & Bergler, S. (Eds.), Lexical semantics and

knowledge representation: ACLSIGLEX Workshop Berkeley, California.

Croft, William, Cruse, Allan. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Cruse, D. Alan. (2000). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and

Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cruse, D.A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cruse, D.A. (1992). Monosemy vs. polysemy. Linguistics, 30: 577-599.


194

Cruse, D.A. (1995). Polysemy and related phenomena from a cognitive linguistics

viewpoint. In P. St. Dizier and E. Viegas (eds.). Computational Lexical

Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 34-49.

Cruse, D.A. (1999). Lexical ‘facets’: Between monosemy ad polysmey. In

Sprachspiel and Bedeutung: Festschrift fur Franz Hundsnurscher zum 65.

Geburtstag (S. Beckmann, P.P. Konig, and G. Wolf, eds.), 25-36.

Niemeyer, Tubingen.

Csordas, Thomas J. (1994). Introduction: the body as representation and being-in-

the-world. In Csordas, Thomas J. (ed.), Embodiment and Experience: The

Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge University Press,

Cambridge, 1-24.

Cuyckens, H., and Zawada, B. (2001). Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics.

Amsterdam, NJ: John Benjamins.

Cuyckens, Hubert, Awada, Britta (eds.). (2001). Polysemy in Cognitive

Linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.

Cuyckens, Hubert, Dirven, Rene, Taylor, John R. (eds.). (2003). Cognitive

Approaches to lexical semantics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.

Danesi, M. (1990). Thinking is seeing: Visual metaphors and the nature of

abstract thought. Semiotica 80.3/4: 221-237.


195

Dash, Niladri Sekhar. (2005). Role of context in word sense understanding. Indian

Linguistics. Journal of the Linguistic Society of India Vol. 65, No. 1-4. 66:

159-175. Deccan College, Pune.

Dash, Niladri Shekhar. (2001). Review of polysemy of Ravin, Yael and Leacock,

Claudia (eds.). (2000). Polysemy-Theoretical and Computational

Approaches. London: OUP.

Deane, P.D. (1987). Semantic Theory and the problem of polysemy. Ph.D.

dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago.

Deane, P.D. (1988). Polysemy and cognition. Lingua, 75: 325-361.

Deignan, Alic and Liz Potter. (2004). A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms

in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1231-1252.

Deignan, Alice and Potter, Liz. (2004). A corpus study of metaphors and

metonyms in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1231-1252.

Dik, S.C. and K. Hengeveld. (1991). The hierarchical structure of the clause and

the typology of perception-verb complements. Linguistics 29: 231-259.

Dirven, R. (1993). Metonymy and metaphor: Different mental strategies of

conceptualization. Leuvense Bijdragen 82: 1-28.

Dirven, Rene and Porings, Ralf (eds). (2002). Cognitive Linguistics: Metaphor

and Metonymy in comparison and contrast. Mouton de Gruyter.

Dolling, J. (1992). Polysmey and sort coercion in semantic representations. In

Discourse and lexical meaning (Arbeigspapiere des


196

Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, No 30) (P. Bosch and P. Gerstl, eds.), 61-

78.

Eaton, Trevor. (1972). Theoretical Semics. Mouton and Co. C.V. publishers. The

Hague.

Engen, T. (1982). The perception of Odours. New York: Academic Press.

Enghels, Renata. (2005). Les modalites de perception visuelle et auditive:

Differences cognitives et repercussions semantico-syntaxiques en

espagnol et en francais. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Gent,

Belgium.

Evans, Gareth and McDowell, John (eds.). (1976). Truth and Meaning: Essays in

Semantics. London: OUP

Evans, Nicholas, Wilkins, David. (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic

extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language,

Volume 76, Number 3 (2000), 546-593.

Evans, Nicholas, Wilkins, David. (2001). The complete person: Networking the

physical and the social. Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian

languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 493-521.

Evans, Nicholas. (1992). Multiple semiotic systems, hyperpolysemy, and the

reconstruction of semantic change in Australian languages.

Evans, Nicholas. (2003). Context, Culture, and Structuration in the Languages of

Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 13-40.


197

Evans, Vyvyan and Green, Melanie. (2005). Cognitive Linguistics: An

introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Evans, Vyvyan. (2005). The meaning of time: polysemy, the lexicon and

conceptual structure. In J. Linguistics 41 (2005). Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, 33-75.

Fass, D. (1991). Met*: A method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by

computer. Computational Linguistics, 17 (1), 49-90.

Fellbaum, C. (1990). English verbs as a semantic net. International Journal of

Lexicography, 3(4), 278-301.

Fenyvesi-Jobbagy, Katalin. (2004). Non-literal and non-metaphorical uses of

Danish komme ‘come’: A case study. UDC 81’ 373.612.2, Jezlkoslovlje

4.2: 225-244.

Ferguson, C.A. (1959). Diglossia. Word 15: 325-40.

Fernandez Jaen, Jorge. (2006). Verbos de percepcion sensorial en espanol: una

clasificacion cognitiva. Interlinguistica 16: 1-14.

Fieke Van der Gucht, Klaas Willems, Ludovic De Cuypere. (2006). The iconicity

of embodied meaning. Polysemy of spatial preposition in the cognitive

framework.

Fillmore, C.J. (1978). The organization of semantic information in the lexicon. In

Papers for the Parasession on the lexicon. Chicago Linguistics Society.


198

Fillmore, C.J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.),

Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 111-138.

Fillmore, J. and Atkins, B.T.S. (1992). Towards a frame-based lexicon: the

semantics of risk and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer and E. Feder Kittay (eds.),

Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical

Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Fillmore, J.C. (1966). Deictic categories in the semantics of come. In Foundations

of language, 2, 219-227.

Fillmore, J.C. (1971). Toward a Theory of Deixis. In University of Hawaii

working papers in linguistics, vol. 3, 219-242.

Fillmore, J.C. (1975). Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixix 1971. Bloomington: IULC.

Fillmore, J.C. (1982). Towards a Descriptive Framework for Spatial Deixis. In

Jarvella, R.J. and Klein, W. (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action. Studies in

deixis and related topics. Chichester (u.a.): John Wiley and Sons, 31-59.

Fillmore, J.C. (1983). How to Know Whether You’re Coming or Going. In Rauh,

G. (ed.), Essays on Deixis. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 219-227.

Fillmore, J.C. (1997). Lectures on Deixix. Standford: CSLI Publications.

Francke, A.H. (1901). Sketch of Ladakhi Grammar. journal of the Asiatic Society

of Bengal, Vol. 1xx, Part I, 1900, Extra No. 2. Calcutta.

Francke, A.H. (1905). A Lower Ladakhi Version of the Kesar Saga. Asian

Educational Services, New Delhi.


199

Francke, A.H. (1979 edition). Ladakhi and Tibetan Grammar. Seema Publication,

Delhi.

Fujii, Yoko. (1999). The story of “break”: Cognitive categories of objects and the

system of verbs. In Hiraga, Masako, Chris Sinha and Sherman Wilcox

(eds.), Cultural, Psychological, and Typological Issues in Cognitive


Company.

Gale, W., church, K., and Yarowsky, D. (1992). A method for disambiguating

word senses in a large corpus. Computational and the Humanities 26:

415-439.

Garcia Hernandez, B. (1976). El campo semantico de ‘ver’ en la lengua Latina.

Estudio structural. Salamanca: Universad de Salamanca.

Garcia-Miguel, Jose Maria. (2005). Aproximacion empirica a la interaccion de

verbos y esquemas construccionales, ejemplificada con los verbos de

percepcion. Estudios de Linguistica Universidad de Alicante (ELUA) 19:

169-91.

Geeraerts, D. (1990). The lexicographical treatment of prototypical polysemy. In

Tsohatzidis, S.L. (Ed.), Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic

Classification, 195-210. Routledge, London.

Geeraerts, D. (1993). Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries, cognitive

linguistics 4.3: 223-273.


200

Geeraerts, Dirk and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds). (2007). The Oxford Handbook of

Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ghassemzadeh, Habibollah. (2004). Vygotsky’s mediational psychology: A new

conceptualization of culture, signification and metaphor. In Language

Sciences 27 (2005). Elsevier Ltd, 281-300.

Gibbs, R. (1984). Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science,

8(3), 275-304.

Gibbs, R.W.Jr. (1994). The Poetics of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1996). What’s cognitive about cognitive linguistics? In

Rene Dirven, Ronald W. Langacker and John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive

Linguistics in the Redwoods, The Expansion of a New Paradigm in

Linguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1996). Why many concepts are metaphorical? Cognitive 61:

309-319.

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. and Gerard J. Steen (eds.). (1999). Metaphor in Cognitive


Company.

Gibson, J.J. (1950). The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton-

Mifflin.


201

Gibson, J.J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston:

Houghton-Mifflin.

Gisborne, N. (1996). English Perception Verbs. PhD Dissertation. University

College London.

Goatly, Andrew. (1997). The languages of Metaphors. Routledge 11, New Fetter

Lane, London EC 4P 4EE.

Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.). (1994). Semantic and Lexical

Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings. John Benjamins Publishing

Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.

Goddard, Cliff. (2004). The lexical semantics of culture. In Language Sciences 27

(2005). Elsevier Ltd, 51-73.

Goosens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in

expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 323-340.

Gorfein, S. David. (1989). Resolving Semantic Ambiguity. New York: Springer-

Verlag.

Grierson, G.A. (1927). Linguistic Survey of India, Vol-III, Part-I, 51-70. Low

Price Publications, Delhi.

Gupta, K. Manohar. (2006). Linguistic Approach to Meaning in Pali. Sundeep

Prakashan, Delhi.

Halliday, M.A. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London,

Baltimore and Melbourne: Edward Arnold.


202

Hamid, Abdul. (1998). Ladakhi-English-Urdu Dictionary. Melong Publication,

Leh, Ladakh.

Hanks, Patrick (ed.). (2008). Lexicology: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, vol. I

to VI. Routledge.

Haser, Verena. (2003). Metaphor in semantic change. In Barcelona, Antonio (ed.),

Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin, New York: Mouton de

Gruyter.

Heine, B., U. Claudi and F. Hunnenmeyer. (1991). Grammaticalization. A

Conceptual Framework. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Held, R. (1988). Readings from the Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Sensory

Systems I: Vision and Visual Systems. Boston, Basel: BirkHauser.

Herskovits, Annette. (1986). Language and Spatial Cognition: An

Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Bosto, Basel:

Birkhauser.

Hirst, G. (1987). Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. CUP,

Cambridge, England.

Ho, Harvey Hsin-chang. (2008). The polysemy of PO in Mandarin Chinese. The

proceedings of ROCLING XX: Conference on Computational Linguistics

and Speech Processing, 244-258.


203

Horie, Kaoru. (1993). A Cross-linguistic study of Perception and Cognition Verb

Complements: A Cognitive Perspective. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.

University of Southern California.

Horno Cheliz, Maria del Carmen. (2002). Aspecto lexico y verbos de percpcion: a

proposito de ver y mirar. In Rosa Maria Castaner (ed.), memoriam Manuel

Alvar. Archivo de Filologia Aragonesa 59-60: 555-76.

Hoshi, Michiyo and Tsering, Tondup. (1978). Zanskar Vocabulary: A Tibetan

dialect spoken in Kashmir. Institute for the study of languages and cultures

of Asia and Africa.

Howes, M.M. (1990). The Psychology of human Cognition. New York: Pergamon.

Hudson, Richard. (1995). Word Meaning. London: Routledge, II New Fetter Lane.

Hurford, James R. & Heasley, Brendan. (1983). Semantics: a course book.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide and L. Serratrice. (1999). Ms. Making Sense of ‘Over’:

A Study in Acquisition. Department of Linguistics. University of

Edinburgh.

Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1997). Smelling and perception: A cross-linguistic

study. In A. Barcelona (ed.) Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa 6.2: 113-21.

Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1999). Polysemy and Metaphor in Perception Verbs:

A Cross-linguistic Study. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Edinburgh.


204

Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1999a). Semantic extensions in the sense of smell.

International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology. Anuario de

Seminaria de Filologia Vasca Julio de Urquijo (In press).

Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1999b). Metaphorical mappings in the sense of smell.

In R. W. Gibbs Jr. and G. Steen (eds.) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics.

Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 29-45.

Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1999c). an inside look at tactile verbs. In F. J. Ruiz

de Mendoza, A. Barreras and S. Pena (eds.) Perspectivas aplicadas de la

organizacion del conocimiento y del procesamiento y uso del lenguaje.

Logrono: Universidad de Logrono (In press).

Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide. (1999d). Predictable vs. Unpredictable Polysemy. In

S. J. Hwang and A. Lommel (eds.) LACUS Forum 25: 201-211.

Iwata, S. (1995). Invariance again: what is preserved in a metaphorical mapping?.

English Linguistics 12: 173-196.

Jackendoff, Ray. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. The Massachutt Institute of

Technology.

Johnson, C. (1999). Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: the

case of see. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox (eds.) Cultural,

Typological and Psychological Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics.

Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.


205

Johnson, Christopher. (1999). Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of

polysemy: The case of see. In Hiraga, Masako, Chris Sinha and Sherman

Wilcox (eds), Cultural, Psychological, and Typological Issues in

Cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins

Publishing Company.

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: the Bodily Basis of Meaning,

Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johnson, M. (1992). Philosophical implications of cognitive semantics. In

cognitive linguistics 3.4: 345-366.

Katz, J.J. & Fodor, J.A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39,

170-210.

Katz, Jerrold J. (1972). Semantic Theory. New York: Harper and Row.

Keller, Barbara. (1986). A Qualitative approach to the study of language and

identity in Ladakh.

Kempson, M. Ruth. (1977). Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Kilgarriff, A. (1992). Polysemy. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, CSRP 261,

School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences.

Kilgarriff, A. (1993). Dictionary Word Sense Distinctions: An enquiry into their

nature. Computers and the Humanities 26 (1-2): 365-387.


206

Kilgarriff, A. (1995). Inheriting polysemy. In Computational Lexical Semantics

(P. Saint Dizier and E. Viegas, eds.), 319-335. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Kilgarriff, A. (1997). I don’t believe in word senses. Computers and the

Humanities 31: 91-113

Kilgarriff, A. (2004). How dominant is the commonest sense of a word? In Text,

Speech, Dialogue. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol. 3206.

Sojka, Kopecek and Pala, (eds.). Springer Verlag: 103-112.

Kilgarriff, A., G. Gazdar. (1995). Polysemous relations. In Grammar and

Meaning: Essays in Honor of Sir John Lyons (F. Palmer, ed.) 1-25.


Knowles, Murray & Moon, Rosamund. (2006). Introducing Metaphor. Oxon:

Routledge.

Konchok Phanday. (2007). Comment on Thonmi’s Grammar. Cultural

Preservation & Promotion Society, Achinathang, Leh (Ladakh).

Koshal, Sanyukta. (1976). Ladakhi Phonetic Reader. Publication Unit, Central

Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore.

Koshal, Sanyukta. (1979). Ladakhi Grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas.

Koshal, Sanyukta. (1982). Conversational Ladakhi. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass.

Koshal, Sanyukta. (2006). Guide to learn Ladakhi language: a phrase book for

learning Ladakhi language. Hanish & Co., Delhi.


207

Kovecses, Zoltan, and Szabo, Peter. (19986). Metaphors of anger, pride, and love:

A lexical approach to the study of concepts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Kravchenko, Alexander. (2005). Cognitive linguistics, biology of cognition and

biosemiotics: Bridging the gaps. In Language Sciences 28 (2006). Elsevier

Ltd, 51-75.

Krifka, Manfred. (1998). Polysemy in LIN393S Lexical Semantics.

Kurath, H. (1921). The Sematnic Sources of the Words from the Emotions in

Sanskrit, Greek, Latin and the Germanic Languages. Menasha (Wi):

George Banta Publishing Co.

Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide

to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. The

embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic

Books.

Lakoff, George, Johnson, Mark. (1980). Metaphor we live by. Chicago: The

University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories

Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, George. (1988). Cognitive Semantics. In Eco, U., M. Santambrogio and P.

Violi (eds) Meaning and Mental Representations. Blooington: Indiana



208

Lakoff, George. (1992). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor (2nd

edition).


Lakoff, George. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony

(ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Landau, B. and L.R. Gleitman. (1985). Language and Experience. Cambridge,

Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I:

Theoretical prerequisites. Standford: Standford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2:

Descriptive application. Standfor: Standford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W. (2002). Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis

of Grammar 2nd

edition. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Leder, Drew. (1990). The Absent Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lee, Keedong. (1996). Getting at the meaning of make. . In Rene Dirven, Ronald

W. Langacker and John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics in the

Redwoods, The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics. New York:

Mouton de Gruyter.

Leech, G. (1981). Semantics: the Study of Meaning. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 2nd

edition.

Leech, Geoffrey. (1974). Semantics. CUP, Cambridge, England.


209

Lehrer, A. (1990). Polysemy conventionality, and the structure of the lexicon.

Cognitive Linguistics I.2: 207-246.

Lehrman, Alexander. (2005). Meaning as grammar. In Language Sciences 28

(2006). Elsevier Ltd, 497-507.

Lepore, E., Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). What is Cognitive Science? Blackwell, Oxford.

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. (2007). Polysemy, Prototypes, and Radial

Categories. In Geeraerts, Dirk & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), The Oxford

Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lewandowski, Wojciech. (2007). Toward a comparative analysis of COMING

and GOING verbs in Spanish, German, and Polish. Master degree

Dissertation, Univeritat Autonoma de Barcelona.

Litchenberk, F. (1991). Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization.

Language 67.3: 474-509.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (2 vols.). London & New York: Cambridge

University Press.

Lyons, J. (1981). Language and Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge

University Press.

Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistics Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge, England;

New York: Cambridge University Press.

MacLaury, Robert E. (1991). Prototypes revisited. Annual Review of

Anthropology, Vol.20, p.55.


210

MacWhinney, B. (1989). Competition and lexical categorization. In Corrigan, R.,

Eckman, F., & Noonan, M. (Eds.), Linguistic Categorization, 195-241.

John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Mark Turner and Gilles Fauconnier. (2003). Metaphor, Metonymy, and binding.

In Barcelona, Antonio (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads.

Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Marobela, Refilwe Mmaseroka. (2006). Polysemy of the verbs YA ‘go’ and TLA

‘come’ in Northern Sotho. Master degree Dissertation, University of

Stellenbosch.

Michaelis, Laura. (1996). Cross-world continuity and the polysemy of adverbial

still. In Fauconnier, Gilles, Sweetser, Eve (eds.), Spaces, worlds, and

grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 179-226.

Miller, G.A. and P.N. Johnson-Laird. (1976). Language and Perception.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Miller, George A. & Philip N. Johnson-Laird. (1977). Language and perception.

Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Miller, George. (1990). Wordnet: An on-line lexical database. International

Journal of Lexicography (special issue), 3(4):235-312.

Miller, I.J.Jr. and Bartoshuck, L.M. (1991). Taste perception, taste bud

distribution, and spatial relationships. In T.V. Getschell, R.L. Doty, >.M.


211

Bartoshuck, and J.B. Snow, Jr. (eds.), Smell and Taste in Health and

Disease. New York: Raven Pres, 175-204.

Miller, I.J.Jr. and F.E. Reedy. (1990). Variations in human taste bud density and

tste intensity perception. Physiology and Perception 47: 1213-1219.

Mishra, Rajnish Kumar. (1965). Buddhist Theory of Meaning and Literary

Analysis. D.K. Printworld (P) Ltd, New Delhi.

Moiseeva, N. (1998). Verbs of perception in Russian. In M. Giger, T. Menzel and

B. Wiemer (eds.), Lexicologie und Sprachveranderung in der Slavia.

Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 2. Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und

Informationssystem der Universitat Oldenburg, 153-164.

Nakazawada, Tsuneko. (1990). Pragmatic account of the distribution of come and

go in English, Japanese and Korean. In H. Hoji (ed.), Japanese/Korean

Linguistics, vol. 1, 97-110. Standford: CSLI Publications.

Nakazawada, Tsuneko. (2005). On come and go in English, Japanese, and

Chinese: Why do they come while others go? In Language, Information,

Text, vol. 12, 43-62. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.

Nakazawada, Tsuneko. (2006). Motion Event Deictic Motion Verbs as path-

conflating verbs. In Muller, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG06

Conference. Standford: CSLI Publications.

Nemeth, Eniko, T., Bibok, Karoly. (2001). Pragmatics and the flexibility of word

meaning. Elsevier.


212

Nerlich, B. and Clarke, D.D. (1997). Polysemy. Patterns of meaning and patterns

of history. Historiographia Linguistica XXIV.3: 349-385.

Nerlich, Brigitte and Clarke, D. David. (2001). ‘Ambiguities we live by: towards

a pragmatic of polysemy’, Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1-20, School of

Psychology, University of Nottingham, University park, Nottingham, NG7

2 RD, UK.

Nerlich, Brigitte, David D. Clarke, and Zazie Todd. (1999). “Mummy, I like

being a sandwich”: Metonymy in Language Acquisition. In Panther,

Klaus-Uwe and Gunter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and

Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Nerlich, Brigitte. (2003). Polysemy: past and present. In Brigitte Nerlich, Zazie

Todd, Vimala Herman, David D. Clarke (eds.), Trends in Linguistics,

Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language. Mouton de

Gruyter.

Niemeier, Susanne. (2003). Straight from the Heart-Metonymic and metaphoric

explorations. In Barcelona, Antonio (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the

Crossroads. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Norberg-Hodge, Helena & Thupstan Paldan. (1991). Ladakhi English Dictionary.

The Ladakh Ecological Development Group and the Ladakh Project, Leh,

Ladakh.

Norman, Rebecca (unpublished). Ladakhi-English Dictionary.


213

Norman, Rebecca. (1994). Getting Started in Ladakhi: A phrase book for learning

Ladakhi. Melong Publication, Leh, Ladakh.

Nunberg, G. (1979). The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions. Polysemy,

Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 143-184.

Nunberg, G. (1996). Transfers of meaning. In Lexical Semantics: The problem of

polysemy (J. Pustejovsky and B. Boguraev, eds.), 109-132. Clarendon

Press, Oxford.

Nunberg, G., Zaenen, A. (1991). Systematic polysemy in lexicology and

lexicography. In Euralex 92 proceedings. Part II (H. Tommola, K.

Varantola, T. Salmi-Tolonen, and J. Schopp, eds.), 387-396. Tampere.

Oe, Saburo. (1975). Nichieigo no hikakukenkyuu: syukansei o megutte (A

comparative study of Japanese and English: on subjectivity). Tokyo:

Nanundo.

OKUNO, Tadanori. (1993). An Integrated Theory of Coming and Going. Bull.

Fac. Educ. Hirosaki University 70: 11-20.

Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, Jonathan Crowther (ed.). (1996). Oxford

University Press.

Palmer, F.R. (1966). A Linguistic Study of the English Verb. London: Longman.

Palmer, F.R. (1976). Semantics. CUP, Cambridge, England.

Palmer, F.R. (1981). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Panman, O. (1982). Homonymy and polysemy. Lingua, 58: 105-136.


214

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda L. (2007). Metonymy. In Geeraerts,

Dirk & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive

Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Gunter Radden (eds.). (1999). Metonymy in Language

and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing

Company.

Papafragou, A. (1996). On metonymy. Lingua 99.4: 169-195.

Peeters, Bert (Ed.). (2006). Semantic primes and universal grammar. John

Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.

Petho, Gergely. (2001). What is Polysemy?—A Survey of Current Research and

Results. In Eniko Nemeth T. and Karoly Bibok (eds.), Pragmatics and the

Flexibility of word meaning. Elsevier.

Petruck, Miriam. (1986). Body part terminology in Hebrew: A study in lexical

semantics. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.

Poutsma, H. (1926). A Grammar of Late Modern English. Part II: The Parts of

Speech. Section II. Groningen: P. Nordhoff.

Prevot, A. (1935). Verbes grecs relatifs a la vision et noms de l’oeil. RPh 9: 133-

60.

Pustejovsky, J. (1989). Current issues in computational lexical semantics. In ACL

Proceedings, 4th

European Conference, xvii-xxiii Manchester.

Pustejovsky, James. (1995). The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.


215

Quine, W.V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, Mass; MIT press.

Radden, Gunter and Zoltan Kovecses. (1999). Towards a Theory of Metonymy.

In Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Gunter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language

and Thought. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing

Company.

Radden, Gunter. (1996). Motion metaphorized: The case of coming and going. In

Rene Dirven, Ronald W. Langacker and John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive



Radden, Gunter. (2003). How metonymic are metaphors? In In Barcelona,

Antonio (ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin, New

York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. (2004). There and back: the case of Russian ‘go’. The

Slavic and East European Language Resource Center.

Raukko, Jarno. (1999). An “intersubjective” method for Cognitive-semantic

research on polysemy: the case of get. In Hiraga, Masako, Chris Sinha and

Sherman Wilcox (ed.), Cultural, Psychological, and Typological Issues in

Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins

Publishing Company.

Ravin, Y. (1990). Lexical semantics without Thematic Roles. Oxford: OUP


216

Ravin, Yael and Leacock, Claudia (eds.). (2000). Polysemy-Theoretical and

Computational Approaches. London: OUP

Riemer, Nick. (2005). The Semantics of polysemy: Reading meaning in English

and Warlpiri. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Robins, R.H. (1987). Polysemy and the lexicographer. In Burchfield, R.W. (Ed.),

Studies in Lexicography, 52-75. OUP, Oxford.

Roegiest, Eugeen. (2003). Argument Structure of Perception Verbs and Actance

Variation of the Spanish Direct Object. In G. Fiorentino (ed.), Romance

Objects. Transitivity in Romance Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,

299-322.

Rogers, A. (1971). Three kinds of physical perception verbs. Chicago Linguistics

Society 7: 206-223.

Rogers, A. (1972). Another look at flip perception verbs. Chicago Linguistics

Society 8: 303-316.

Rogers, A. (1973). Physical Perception Verbs in English: A Study in Lexical

Relatedness. PhD Dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.

Rojo, Ana and Javier Valenzuela. (2004-2005). Verbs of Sensory Perception: An

English-Spanish Comparison. Languages in Constrast 5.2: 219-43.

Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B.B. (Eds.). (1978). Cognition and Categorization. Lawrence

Erlbaum, New Jersey.


217

Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories.

In T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and Acquisition of Language.

New York: Academy Press.

Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (ed.), Advances in Cross-

Cultural Psychology. London: Academy Press.

Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds),

Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal

structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 573-605.

Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. In Annual

Review of Psychology, 32: 89-115.

Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., Boyes-Braem, P. (1976).

Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology 8, 382-439.

Rosch, Eleanor. (1975). Cognitive representations for semantic categories. Journal

of Experimental Psychology: General 104, 192-233.

Ruhl, Charles. (1989). On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics. State

University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, Francisco Jose. (2007). High-level metaphor and

metonymy in meaning construction. In Radden, Gunter, Klaus-Michael

Kopke, Thomas Berg, and Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of Meaning


218

Construction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing

Company.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (1997). An interview with George Lakoff. In A. Barcelona

(ed.), Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa 6.2: 33-52.

Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Hutchinson, London.

Saint-Dizier, Patrick & Viegas, Evelyne. (1995). An introduction to lexical

semantics from a linguistic and a psycholinguistic perspective. In Saint-

Dizier, Patrick & Viegas, Evelyne (eds.), Studies in Natural Language

Processing: Computational Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Schiffman, S.S. and R.P. Erickson. (1980). The issue of primary tastes versus a

taste continuum. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 4: 109-117.

Schwanenflugel, P.J. (1991). Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In P.J.

Schwanenflugel (ed.). The psychology of word meaning. Hillsdale, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum, 223-250.

Schwarz, Ch., Schepping, M.-T. (1995). Polysemy in a two-level-semantics. In

Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language (U. Egli, P. Pause,

Ch. Schwarze, A. von Stechow, and G. Wienold, eds.), 283-300. John

Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Sekuler, R. and Blake, R. (1994). Perception. New York: McGraw-Hill.


219

Sharma, D.D. (1996). Tribal Languages of Ladakh: part I and II. Delhi: Mittal

Publications Delhi-110035 (INDIA).

Shen, Ya-Ming. (1996). The semantics of the Chinese verb “come”. . In Rene

Dirven, Ronald W. Langacker and John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive



Wangchuk, Sonam. (1994 to 2006). Ladags Melong ‘Mirror of Ladakh’: A

bilingual magazine (25 issues). Melong Publication, Leh, Ladakh.

Spark Jones, K. (1986). Synonymy and semantic classification. Edinburgh

University Press, Edinburgh.

Sprig, R.K. (2002). Balti-English, English-Balti Dictionary. Routledge Curzon,

New York.

Stock, P.F. (1983). Polysemy. In Proc. Exeter Lexicography Conference, 131-

140.

Su, Lily I-wen and Hsiu-min Liu, Laura. (2001). Metaphorical Extension and

Lexical Meaning. Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Taiwan

University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Svorou, Soteria. (1993). The grammar of Space. Amsterdam and Philadelphia:

John Benjamins.

Sweetser, Eve. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics Metaphorical and cultural

aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


220

Talmy, L. (1975). Semantics and Syntax of motion. In Kimball, J.P. (ed.), Syntax

and Semantics 4, 181-238. New York: Academic Press.

Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms.

In Shopen, T. (ed.), Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Language

Typology and Syntactic Description III, Cambridge: Cambridge


Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language cognition. Cognitive Science 12:

49-100.

Talmy, L. (2000). Typology and Process in concept structuring. Toward a

Cognitive Semantics, Vol.2. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.

Tashi, Konchok. (in press). English as medium of instruction in tribal areas

specifically in Leh Ladakh (J&K). In Indian Linguistics: 70: 425-428.

Tashi, Konchok. (2010). The polysemy of the deictic motion verb YONG ‘come’

in Ladakhi. In Interdisciplinary Journal of Linguistics (IJL) by

Department of Linguistics, University of Kashmir, Srinagar.

Taub, Sarah. (2001). Language from the body: iconicity and metaphor in

American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, John R. (1989). Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic

Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, John R. (1992). Old problems. Adjectives in Cognitive Grammar.

Cognitive Linguistics 3, 1-46.


221

Taylor, John R. (1994). The two-level approach to polysemy. Linguistische

Berichte, 149: 3-26.

Taylor, John R. (1995). Linguistic Categorization: An essay in Cognitive

Linguistics. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

Taylor, John R. (1999b). Approaches to word meaning: The network model

(Langacker) and the two-level model (Bierwisch) in comparison. In

Current Approaches to the Lexicon (R. Dirven and J. Vanparys, eds.), 3-

26. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.

Taylor, John R. (2002). Near synonyms as coextensive categories. ‘High’ and

‘tall’ revisited. Language Sciences, 25, 263-284.

Taylor, John R. (2003). Polysemy’s paradoxes. In Language Sciences 25 (2004).

Elsevier Ltd, 637-655.

Thepkanjana, Kingkarn & Uehara, Satoshi. (2007). The verb of giving in Thai and

Mandarin Chinese as a case of polysemy: A comparative study. In

Language Sciences.

Towell, G., and Voorhees, E.M. (1998). Disambiguating highly ambiguous words.

Computational Linguistics 24.1: 125-146.

Tuggy, D. (1993). Ambiguity, polysemy and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics 4.3:

273-290.

Tyler, Andrea, Evans, Vyvyan. (2001b). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy

networks: the case of over. Lanaguage 77: 724-765.


222

Tyler, Andrea, Evans, Vyvyan. (2003). The Semantics of English prepositions:

spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Tyler, Andrea, Evans, Vyvyan. (2004). Applying cognitive linguistics to

pedagogical grammar: the case of over. In Achard, M., Niemeier, S. (Eds.),

Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language

teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 257-280.

Ullmann, Stephen. (1972). Semantics: An introduction to the science of Meaning.

Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Ungerer, F. and H-J. Schmid. (1996). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics.

London: Longman. Essentials of Grammatical Theory: A Consensus View

of Syntax and Morphology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Vendler, Z. (1967). Philosophy and Linguistics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University

Press.

Viberg, A. (1984). The verbs of perception: a typological study. In B. Butterworth,

B. Comrie and O. Dahl (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals.

Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 123-162.

Vinge, L. (1975). The Five Senses: Studies in a Literary Tradition. Lund, Sweden:

Publications of the Royal Society of Letters at Lund.

Vlach, F. (1983). On situation semantics for perception. Synthese 54: 129-152.

Webster, Jeff. (1991). A survey of the Ladakhi Language.


223

Weinreich, U. (1980). On semantics. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (1972). Semantic Primitives. Athenaum, Frankfurt.

Wierzbicka, A. (1987). Boys will be boys: ‘radical semantics’ vs. ‘radical

pragmatics’. Language, 63(1), 95-114.

Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics; Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures through their Keywords. Oxford

University Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and

Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wiggins, D. (1971). On sentence sense, word-sense and difference of word-sense.

Towards a philosophical theory of dictionaries. In Steinberg, D.D. &

Jakobitz, L.A. (Eds.), semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader. CUP,

Cambridge, England.

Wilkins, David P. and Dborah Hill. (1995). When GO means COME:

Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics

6(2): 209-259.

Willems, Klass. (2005). Logical polysemy and variable verb valency. In

Language Sciences 28 (2006). Elsevier Ltd, 580-603.

Williams, John N. (1992). Processing polysemous words in context: Evidence for

interrelated meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21:193-218.


224

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953). Philosophical Investigation. New York: Macmillan.

Wolfe, J.H. (1988). Readings from the Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Sensory

Systems II: Senses Other than Vision. Boston, Basel: Birkhauser.

Yu, Ning. (1995). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English

and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10, 59-92.

Yu, Ning. (1998). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from

Chinese. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Yu, Ning. (1999). Spatial Conceptualization of time in Chinese. In Hiraga,

Masako K., Sinha, Chris, Wilcox, Sherman (eds.), Cultural, Psychological

and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins,

Amsterdam, 69-84.

Yu, Ning. (2000). Figurative uses of finger and palm in Chinese and English.

Metaphor and Symbol 15, 159-175.

Yu, Ning. (2001a). What does our face mean to us? Pragmatics and Cognition 9,

1-36.

Yu, Ning. (2001b). Chinese metaphors of thinking. Paper presented at the 7th

International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 23-27 July, Santa Barbara,

CA. [revised version to appear in Palmer, Gary B., Goddard, Cliff, Lee,

Penny (eds), the special issue on “Talking about Thinking across

Languages”, Cognitive Linguistics14].


225

Yu, Ning. (2002). Body and emotion: body parts in Chinese expression of

emotion. In Enfield, N.J., Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.), (special issue) The

Body in Description of Emotion: Cross-linguistic Studies. Pragmatics and

Cognition 10, 341-367.

Yu, Ning. (2003a). Metaphor, body, and culture: the Chinese understanding of

gallbladder and courage. Metaphor and Symbol 18, 13-31.

Yu, Ning. (2003b). Synesthetic metaphor: a cognitive perspective. Journal of

Literary Semantics 32, 19-34.

Yu, Ning. (2003c). The bodily dimension of meaning in Chinese: what do we do

and mean with “hands”? In Casad, Eugene H., Palmer, Gary B. (eds.),

Cognitive Linguistics and Non-Indo-European Languages. Mouton de

Gruyter, Berlin, 337-362.

Yu, Ning. (2004). The eyes for sight and mind. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 663-686

Yu-Fang Wang, Flora. A cognitive Account of the Lexical Polysemy of Chinese

Kai ‘open’. Graduate Institute of English, National Taiwan Normal

University.

Zgusta, L. (1971). Manual of lexicography. Mouton, The Hague.

Ziff, Paul. (1960). Semantic Analysis. Cornell: University Press.

Zwicky, Arnold M. and J.M. Sadock. (1995). Ambiguity tests and how to fail

them. Syntax and Semantics, 4:1-36.

bibliography - shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.inshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/13606/... ·...

Documents