bibliography related to the judgments project · the revived judgments project in the hague...

Churchillplein 6b, 2517 JW The Hague - La Haye | The Netherlands - Pays-Bas +31 (70) 363 3303 +31 (70) 360 4867 | [email protected] | www.hcch.net Asia Pacific Regional Office - Bureau régional Asie-Pacifique | S.A.R. of Hong Kong - R.A.S. de Hong Kong | +852 2858 9912 Latin American Regional Office - Bureau régional Amérique latine | Buenos Aires | Argentina – Argentine | +54 (11) 4310 8372

ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS EXÉCUTION DES JUGEMENTS Bibliography Bibliographie

BIBLIOGRAPHY RELATED TO THE JUDGMENTS PROJECT

drawn up by the Permanent Bureau

* * *

BIBLIOGRAPHIE RELATIVE AU PROJET SUR LES JUGEMENTS

établie par le Bureau Permanent

Bibliography on the Judgments Project (last updated 23 January 2018) Bibliographie relative au projet sur les Jugements (dernière mise à jour le 23 janvier 2018)

TAGS: recognition and enforcement rules jurisdictional rules activity-based jurisdiction lis pendens declining juridiction connecting

factors personal jurisdiction forum non conveniens commentary on preliminary draft convention Europe Latin America Asia United

States United Kingdom Australia New Zealand Japan Canada scope intellectual property eCommerce contract tort admiralty

consumer antitrust libel defendant’s forum human rights corporate social responsibility Alien Tort Statute

Author Title Publication Date

1. BORGES, V.R. AND MARCELINO, H.

continuation of the Judgments Project

Latin America

recognition and enforcement rules

jurisdictional rules

Estado Constitutional Cooperativo e a conficaçao do direito internacional privado apontamentos sobre o “Judgement Project” da Conferência de Haia de Direito Internacional Privado

(Cooperative Constitutional State and the Codification of Private International Law : Notes on the “Judgment Project” of the Hague Conference on Private International Law)

Revista Argumentum, vol. 18, no 2, May-August 2017, pp. 291-319

2017

2. BLOM, J.

jurisdictional rules Canada


The Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act and the Hague Conference’s Judgments and Jurisdiction Projects

Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 13, Issue 12, 2017, Research Paper N. 56/2017. available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3054021

2017

https://ssrn.com/abstract=3054021


3. BRAND, R.A

forum non conveniens


Comparative Forum Non Conveniens and the Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments

Procedure and Private International Law, vol. 1, 2017, pp. 143-174

2017

4. DE ARAUJO, N. AND DE NARDI, M.


Latin America


Crônicas de Direito Internacional Privado - Crônica 1. Novidades de 2017 sobre circulação facilitada de sentenças estrangeiras

Revista de Direito Internacional, Brasília, Vol. 14, no 2, 2017, pp. 9-16

2017

5. HEINZE, C.

intellectual property



Auf dem Weg zur weltweiten Urteilsanerkennung? - Ein Einblick in die Verhandlungen über das Haager Anerkennungs - und Voll streckungsübereinkommen (Hague Judgment Convention)

German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR), Newsletter, no 2/2017, pp. 38-40

2017

6. JACOBS, H.

continuation of the Judgments Project recognition and enforcement rules commentary on preliminary draft convention

Der Zwischenstand zum geplanten Haager Anerkennungs- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen

Zeitschrift für Europarecht, internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung – ZfRV, February 2017, pp. 24-30

2017


7. VAN CALSTER, G.

continuation of the Judgments Project recognition and enforcement rules

The Hague Judgments Project. A cauldron full of jurisdictional spells?

(to be published)

Presented at the 2017 Global Forum on Private International Law

location: Chinese Society for Private International Law, Wuhan

date:23 September 2017

2017

8. DE ARAUJO, N. AND DE NARDI, M.



Latin America

Projeto de Sentenças Estrangeiras da Conferência de Haia: por um regime global de circulação internacional de sentenças em matéria civil e comercial

(Foreign Judgments Project of Hague Conference for a Global Regime of International Circulation of Judgments on Civil and Commercial Subjects)

Revista Estudos Institucionais, Vol. 2, no 2, 2016, pp. 707-735

2016

9. DE ARAUJO, N. AND DE NARDI, M. AND POLIDO, F.B.P.


Projeto de Sentenças Estrangeiras da Conferência da Haia: Reflexões sobre a 1ª Reunião da Comissão Especial em 2016 e o Direito Brasileiro

(Foreign Awards Project of the Haia Conference: Reflexions on the 1st Meeting of the Special Commission in 2016 and Brazilian Law)

Revista de Arbitragem e Mediação, Vol. 51/2016, pp. 95-112

2016


10. RIBEIRO, G.F. AND FARIAS I.L.M.C. AND DE ARAUJO, N. AND DE NARDI, M.

continuation of the Judgments Project recognition and enforcement rules commentary on preliminary draft convention Latin America

Crônicas de direito internacional privado - Crônica 3: sentenças estrangeiras com circulação facilitada - notícias da 1ª reunião da comissão pela conferência da Haia de direito especial realizada internacional privado em junho de 2016

Revista de Direito Internacional, Brasília, Vol.13, no 2, 2016, pp. 18-23

2016

11. SVANTESSON, D.J.B.

continuation of the Judgments Project recognition and enforcement rules intellectual property consumer

The Hague conference’s “Judgments Project” 2.0—How will it work in relation to e-commerce?

Internet Law Bulletin, Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 270-273

2016

12. WAGNER, R.


Ein neuer Anlauf zu einem Haager Anerkennungs-und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen

IPRax: Praxis des Internationalen Privat und Verfahrensrecht, Vol. 36, issue 2 (Mar-Apr), pp. 97-102

2016


13. BONOMI, A.


Courage or Caution? A Critical Overview of the Hague Preliminary Draft on Judgments

Yearbook of Private International Law, Vol. 17 (2015-2016), pp. 1-31

2015-2016

14. BEAUMONT, P. AND WALKER, L.

continuation of the Judgments Project recognition and enforcement rules forum non conveniens lis pendens

Recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters in the Brussels I Recast and some lessons from it and the recent Hague Conventions for the Hague Judgments Project

Journal of Private International Law, Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 31-63

2015

15. BRAND, R. A.

continuation of the Judgments Project United States recognition and enforcement rules jurisdictional rules

The Continuing Evolution of U.S. Judgments Recognition Law

U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-37. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2670866

2015

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2670866


16. PORTERFIELD, E

continuation of the Judgments Project commentary on preliminary draft convention

United States


A domestic proposal to revive the Hague Judgments Convention: how to stop worrying about streams, trickles, asymmetry, and a lack of reciprocity

Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, Vol. 25, pp. 81-123

2015

17. REGAN, J.


Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments - A Second Attempt in the Hague

Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business, Vol. 14, Issue 1 (Summer 2015), pp. 63-90

2015

18. ARAUJO, N. DE AND POLIDO, F.B.P.

continuation of the Judgments Project Latin America

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: an assessment of the ongoing work of the Hague Conference on Private International Law

Brazilian Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 20-43

2014

19. BEAUMONT, P.

continuation of the Judgments Project connecting factors

The revived Judgments Project in The Hague Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (NIPR), No 4, pp. 532-539.

2014

http://www.ppl.nl/catalogue/?title=A%20domestic%20proposal%20to%20revive%20the%20Hague%20Judgments%20Convention:%20how%20to%20stop%20worrying%20about%20streams,%20trickles,%20asymmetry,%20and%20a%20lack%20of%20reciprocity&pagename=hcch-catalogue




https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/hcch/showtitles.php?source=Duke%20Journal%20of%20Comparative%20and%20International%20Law

https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/hcch/showtitles.php?source=Duke%20Journal%20of%20Comparative%20and%20International%20Law


20. BORCHERS, P.J.

continuation of the Judgments Project recognition and enforcement rules United States

One Step Forward and Two Back: Missed Opportunities in Refining the United States Minimum Contacts Test and the European Union Brussels I Regulation

Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 31, Issue 1 (Spring 2014), pp. 1-20

2014

21. COOK, J.P.


declining jurisdiction


Declining Jurisdiction in the Hague's Proposed Judgments Convention: Amalgamating the More Appropriate Forum and the Clearly Inappropriate Forum Tests to Provide the Optimal Forum Non Conveniens Clause

Australian International Law Journal; vol. 21, pp. 19-40

2014

22. ELBATI, B.


Spontaneous Harmonization and Liberalization the of the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments

Japanese Yearbook of Private International Law, Vol. 16, pp. 264-188

2014

23. FELDMAN, A.

continuation of the Judgments Project United States tort

Rethinking Review of Foreign Court Jurisdiction in Light of the Hague Judgments Negotiations

New York University Law Review, Vol. 89 Issue 6, p. 2190.

2014

http://catalogue.ppl.nl/DB=1/SET=4/TTL=1/SHW?FRST=9






24. LOKEN, K.

continuation of the Judgments Project United States recognition and enforcement rules

The Current U.S. Judgments Agenda Foreign Court Judgments and the United States Legal System, P.B. Stephan (ed), pp. 118-130

2014

25. REYES, A.

continuation of the Judgments Project Asia recognition and enforcement rules

ASEAN and the Hague Conventions Asia Pacific Law Review, Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. 25-44

2014

26. BORRÁS, A.


El Judgments Project de la Conferencia de La Haya de Derecho Internacional Privado: lecciones del pasado desafíos para el futuro

Anuario español de derecho internacional privado; Vol. 13, pp. 921-943

2013





27. BRAND, R.A.

continuation of the Judgments Project United States Europe recognition and enforcement rules jurisdictional rules

Jurisdictional Developments and the New Hague Judgments Project

A Commitment to Private International Law: Essays in honour of Hans van Loon, (Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, ed.) Intersentia, Cambridge

2013

28. GODDARD, D.


The Fruits of the Judgments Project A Commitment to Private International Law: Essays in honour of Hans van Loon, (Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, ed.) Intersentia, Cambridge

2013

29. MCCLEAN, D.

forum non conveniens declining jurisdiction

The Rights of a Fair Trial, Forum Non Conveniens and the Limits of the Possible

A Commitment to Private International Law: Essays in honour of Hans van Loon, (Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, ed.) Intersentia, Cambridge

2013


30. NISHITANI, Y.

Japan lis pendens jurisdictional rules activity-based jurisdiction tort contract intellectual property consumer declining jurisdiction

International Jurisdiction of Japanese Courts in a Comparative Perspective

Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. LX, p. 251

2013

31. PERTEGÁS, M.

lis pendens continuation of the Judgments Project

Lis Pendens, lessons from Brussels for a relaunched Hague Judgments Project?

Entre Bruselas y La Haya: Estudios sobre la unificación internacional y regional del Derecho internacional privado. Liber amicorum Alegría Borrás (Forner Delaygua, J., González Beilfuss, C., and Viñas Farré, R., eds), Marcial Pons, Madrid, p. 727

2013

32. TROOBOFF, P.D.

Personal jurisdiction continuation of the Judgments Project

Beginning to Rethink Personal Jurisdiction A Commitment to Private International Law: Essays in honour of Hans van Loon, (Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, ed.) Intersentia, Cambridge, pp. 597-607.

2013


33. ZEYNALOVA, Y.

continuation of the Judgments Project United States recognition and enforcement rules

The Law on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Is It Broken and How Do We Fix It?

Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 31, No 1

2013

34. (VARIOUS)

recognition and enforcement rules Europe Latin America Asia United States United Kingdom Australia Japan Canada

Getting the Deal Through: Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in 28 jurisdictions worldwide

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments 2013 (Moedritzer, M. and Whittaker, K.C., eds), Law Business Research Ltd, London

2012

35. BARIATTI, S.

class actions recognition and enforcement rules

Recognition and Enforcement in the EU of Judicial Decisions Rendered Upon Class Actions: The Case of U.S. and Dutch Judgments and Settlements

Recasting Brussels I (Pocar, F., Viarengo, I. and Villata, F.C., eds), Cedam, Milan

2012

36. BAUMGARTNER, S.P.

recognition and enforcement rules Europe United States

Changes in the European Union's Regime of Recognizing and Enforcing Foreign Judgments and Transnational Litigation in the United States

Southwestern Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No 2

2012


37. BRAND, R.A.

United States recognition and enforcement rules

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

Federal Judicial Center International Litigation Guide, available at < http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/brandenforce.pdf/$file/brandenforce.pdf >.

2012

38. BRILMAYER, L. AND SMITH, M.

United States jurisdictional rules

The (Theoretical) Future of Personal Jurisdiction: Issues Left Open by Goodyear Dunlop Tires v. Brown and J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro

South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 63, p. 617

2012

39. BURBANK, S.B.

United States jurisdictional rules lis pendens

International Civil Litigation in U.S. Courts: Becoming a Paper Tiger?

University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 33, No 3 p. 663

2012

40. CHILDRESS, D.E. III

United States forum non conveniens

Forum Conveniens: The Search for a Convenient Forum in Transnational Cases

Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 53, No 1, p. 157

2012

41. EFFRON, R.J.


Letting the Perfect Become the Enemy of the Good: the Relatedness Problem in Personal Jurisdiction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 16, p. 867

2012

http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/brandenforce.pdf/$file/brandenforce.pdf




42. FEDER, M.


Goodyear, ‘Home,’ and the Uncertain Future of Doing Business Jurisdiction

South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 63, No 3, p. 671

2012

43. GROSSI, S.


Rethinking the Harmonization of Jurisdictional Rules

Tulane Law Review, Vol. 86, p. 623 2012

44. HOFFHEIMER, M.H.


General Personal Jurisdiction After Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown

University of Kansas Law Review, Vol. 60, p. 549

2012

45. KONO, T. AND JURČYS, P.


General Report Intellectual Property and Private International Law: Comparative Perspectives (Kono, T., ed.), Hart Publishing, Oxford, p. 6

2012

46. PIELEMEIER, J.R.


Goodyear Dunlop: A Welcome Refinement of the Language of General Personal Jurisdiction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 16, p. 969

2012

47. SILBERMAN, L.J.

defendant’s forum jurisdictional rules

Goodyear and Nicastro: Observations from a Transnational and Comparative Perspective

South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 63, p. 591

2012


48. VAN LITH, H.

jurisdictional rules activity-based jurisdiction contract

Uniform Rules for Contact Disputes: Putting Activity-Related Jurisdiction on the Agenda

Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 91

2012

49. BRAND, R.


Challenges to Forum Non Conveniens NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 45, Issue 4, 1003

2011

50. ELBALTI, B.


Armonización espontánea de los requisitos para el reconocimiento y ejecución de decisiones judiciales extranjeras y la necesidad de un convenio global sobre decisiones judiciales

Anuario español de derecho internacional privado, Vol. 11, pp. 229-268

2011

51. TAKAHASHI, K.

jurisdictional rules Japan forum non conveniens

Japan’s Newly Enacted Rules on International Jurisdiction: With a Reflection on Some Issues of Interpretation

Japanese Yearbook of Private International Law, Vol. 13, p. 146

2011

52. WESTON, C.


The Enforcement Loophole: Judgment-Recognition Defenses as a Loophole to Corporate Accountability for Conduct Abroad

Emory International Law Review, Vol. 25, p. 731

2011


53. WHYTOCK, C.A. AND ROBERTSON, C.B.

jurisdictional rules forum non conveniens

Forum non Conveniens and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

Columbia Law Review, Vol. 111, no. 7, p. 1444

2011

54. MIGUEL ASENSIO, P.A.

recognition and enforcement rules intellectual property

Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Intellectual Property Litigation: The CLIP Principles

Intellectual Property in the Global Arena (Basedow, J., Kono, T. and Metzger, A., eds), Mohr Siebeck, p. 239

2010

55. PEREZ-CORREA, F.

Mexico recognition and enforcement rules

Enforcement and Recognition of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards in México

Defense Counsel Journal, Vol. 77, p. 384.

2010

56. MICHAELS, R.


Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Rüdiger Wolfrum ed.), also available at < http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2076 >.

2009

57. BUCHER, A.

jurisdictional rules recognition and enforcement rules

La dimension sociale du droit international privé

Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye, Vol. 341 (Chapitres V et VI)

2009

http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2076

http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2076


58. MCLACHLAN, C.

lis pendens

Lis Pendens in International Litigation Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de La Haye 2008, Vol. 336, p. 199

2009

59. TU, G.

jurisdictional rules tort contract

Finding a Proper Nexus for Constructing Specific (Special) Jurisdiction Regarding Commercial Contract and Tort Cases

Journal of Private International Law, Vol. 5, pp. 243-279

2009

60. VAN LITH, H.

jurisdictional rules contract

International Jurisdiction and Commercial Litigation: Uniform Rules for Contract Disputes, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

2009

61. WAGNER, R. Die Haager Konferenz für Internationales Privatrecht zehn Jahre nach der Vergemeinschaftung der Gesetzgebungskompetenz in der justiziellen Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen

Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Vol. 73, p. 215

2009

62. WHYTOCK, C.A. Domestic Courts and Global Governance Tulane Law Review, vol. 84, p. 67 2009


recognition and enforcement rules Europe

How well do U.S. judgments fare in Europe The George Washington International Law Review, Vol. 40, p. 173

2008


64. CUNIBERTI, G. The Recognition of Foreign Judgments Lacking Reasons in Europe: Access to Justice, Foreign Court Avoidance, and Efficiency

International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 57, No 1, p. 25

2008

65. DOGAUCHI, M.

The Hague Project to Draft a Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments: An Overview (in Japanese)

Waseda Law Review, Vol. 83, No 3, p. 77

2008

66. OESTREICHER, Y.


“We're on a Road to Nowhere”: Reasons for the Continuing Failure to Regulate Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

International Lawyer, Vol. 42, No 1, p. 59

2008

67. PHAM, K.

Australia recognition and enforcement rules

Enforcement of Non-Monetary Foreign Judgments in Australia

Sydney Law Review, Vol. 30, p. 663. 2008

68. BLACK, V.

Canada United Kingdom recognition and enforcement rules

Canada and the US Contemplate Changes to Foreign-Judgment Enforcement

Journal of Private International Law, Vol. 3, pp. 1-28

2007


69. BRAND, R. AND JABLONSKI, S.

forum non conveniens lis pendens

Forum Non Conveniens: History, Global Practice, and Future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Oxford University Press

2007

70. CHOONG, Y.-C. Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: The Role of the Courts in Promoting (or Impeding) Global Business

World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 24, p. 92

2007

71. OESTREICHER, Y.

commentary on preliminary draft convention

The Rise and Fall of the “Mixed” and “Double” Convention Models regarding Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Vol. 6, p. 339

2007

72. SPIGELMAN, T.B. International commercial litigation: An Asian

Perspective

Australian Business Law Review, Vol. 35, p. 318

2007

73. USUNIER, L.

jurisdictional rules lis pendens forum non conveniens consumer

Regulating the Jurisdiction of Courts in International Litigation: Towards a Global Answer in Civil and Commercial Matters

Yearbook of Private International Law, Vol. 9, p. 541

2007

74. MEHREN, A.T. VON


Should Plaintiffs or Defendants be Jurisdictionally Preferred?

Perspectives on International and Comparative Law, Symposium, Köln, pp. 75-89

2006


75. MICHAELS, R.


Some Fundamental Jurisdictional Conceptions as Applied in Judgment Conventions

Duke Law School Research Paper No 123, August 2006, available at < http://ssrn.com/abstract=927484 >

2006

76. MICHAELS, R.


Two Paradigms of Jurisdiction Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 27, pp. 1003-1069

2006

77. NIBOYET, M.-L. La globalisation du procès civil international dans l’espace judiciaire européen et mondial

Revue trimestrielle LexisNexis JurisClasseur – J.D.I., Vol. 133, No 3, p. 937.

2006

78. SCHULZ, A.

eCommerce intellectual property

The Hague Conference Project for a Global Convention on Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement in Civil and Commercial Matters (the Hague Judgments Project), Electronic Commerce and Intellectual Property

Legal Aspects of an E-Commerce Transaction. International Conference in The Hague 26 and 27 October 2004 (Schulz, A. ed.), Sellier, Munich, p. 293

2006

79. BORRÁS, A. The Frontiers and the Institutional Constitutional Question

International Civil Litigation in Europe and Relations with Third States (Nuyts, A. and Watté, N. eds), Bruylant, Brussels, p. 27.

2005

http://ssrn.com/abstract=927484


80. ANDRIEUX, G.

forum non conveniens lis pendens

Declining Jurisdiction in a Future International Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments: How Can We Benefit from Past Experiences in Conciliating the Two Doctrines of Forum Non Conveniens and Lis Pendens

Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 27, No 3, p. 323

2005

81. AUDIT, B. AND BERMANN, G.A. The Application of Private International Norms to “Third Countries”: The Jurisdiction and Judgments Example

International Civil Litigation in Europe and Relations with Third States (Nuyts, A. and Watté, N. eds), Bruylant, Brussels, p. 55

2005

82. BORRÁS, A.


The 1999 Hague Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments: Agreements and Disagreements

The Hague Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments (Pocar, F. and Honorati, C. eds) Cedam, Milan, p. 41.

2005

83. BRAND, R.

United States commentary on preliminary draft convention

The 1999 Hague Preliminary Draft Convention Text on Jurisdiction and Judgments: A View from the United States

Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale, Vol. 40, No 1, p. 31

The Hague Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments (Pocar, F. and Honorati, C. eds), Cedam, Milan, p. 3.

2005

84. EINSTEIN, C.R. AND PHIPPS, A.


Trends in International Commercial Litigation, Part II: The Future of Foreign Judgment Enforcement Law

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax), Vol. 25, No 4, p. 365

2005


85. FERNÁNDEZ ARROYO, D.P.

Latin America

Acerca de la necesidad y las posibilidades de una Convención interamericanca sobre competencia judicial en casos de derecho internacional privado

Liber Amicorum Didier Opertti Badán, Montevideo, pp. 113-155

2005

86. MUNICOY, M.

jurisdictional rules intellectual property

Allocation of Jurisdiction on Patent Disputes in the Models Developed by the Hague Conference in Private International Law: Asymmetric Countries and The Relationship of Private Parties

Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 4, No 2, p. 342

2005

87. POCAR, F. AND HONORATI, C. (EDS)


The Hague Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments. Proceedings of the Round Table held at Milan University on 15 November 2003, Cedam, Milan

2005

88. SCHULZ, A.

International Organizations: The Global Playing Field for US-EU Cooperation in Private Law Instruments

Private Law, Private International Law, and Judicial Cooperation in the EU-US Relationship (Brand, R. ed.), Thomson/West, Eagan, Minnesota, p. 237

2005

89. WOESTEHOFF, K.

intellectual property eCommerce

The Drafting Process for a Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments with Special Consideration of Intellectual Property and e-Commerce

LLM Theses and Essays, Paper No 54, available at < http://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/stu_llm/54 >.

2005

http://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/stu_llm/54

http://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/stu_llm/54


90. ARVIND, T.T.


The Draft Hague Judgments Convention: Some Perspectives from Arbitration

Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 51, No 3, p. 337

2004

91. BENNETT, D.

commentary on preliminary draft convention jurisdictional rules activity-based jurisdiction tort

The Hague Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments – A failure of characterization

Intercontinental Cooperation Through Private International Law: Essays in Memory of Peter E. Nygh (Einhorn, T. and Siehr, K. eds), T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, p. 19

2004

92. CALLIESS, G.-P.


Value Added Norms, Local Litigation, and Global Enforcement: Why the Brussels Philosophy failed in The Hague

German Law Journal, Vol. 5, No 12, p. 1489

2004

93. CLERMONT, K.M.

United States Japan jurisdictional rules

A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Views from the United States and Japan

Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 37, pp. 1-26

2004


94. ELACQUA, B.C.

scope eCommerce commentary on preliminary draft convention

The Hague Runs into B2B: Why Restructuring the Hague Convention of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters to Deal with B2B Contracts is Long Overdue

Journal of High Technology Law, Vol. 3, p. 93

2004

95. HARTLEY, T.C.

intellectual property commentary on preliminary draft convention jurisdictional rules

Intellectual Property Rights and the Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments: An English Perspective

Intercontinental Cooperation through Private International Law: Essays in Memory of Peter E. Nygh (Einhorn, T. and Siehr, K. eds), T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, p. 155

2004

96. KUR, A.


Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Intellectual Property Matters: Perspectives for the Future.

Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil (GRUR Int.), Vol. 53, No 4, p. 306

2004

97. NIELSEN, P.A. Udkastet til global domskonvention Julebog 2004 (Juridisk Institut ed.), Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, København, p. 189

2004

98. PETKOVA, S.


The Potential Impact of the Draft Hague Convention on International Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters on Internet-Related Disputes with Particular Reference to Copyright

Intellectual Property Quarterly, Vol. 2, No 2, p. 173

2004


99. PHILIP, A.

commentary on preliminary draft convention jurisdictional rules lis pendens forum non conveniens

The Global Hague Judgments Convention: Some Comments


2004

100. POSCH, W.


Resolving Business Disputes through Litigation or Other Alternatives: The Effects of Jurisdictional Rules and Recognition Practice

Houston Journal of International Law, Vol. 26, No 2, p. 363

2004

101. RADICATI DI BROZOLO, L.G.

Antitrust scope

Antitrust Claims: Why exclude them from the Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention

European Competition Law Review, Vol. 25, No 12, p. 780

2004

102. SCHULZ, A.

intellectual property scope

The Hague Project of a Global Judgments Convention and IP Rights: Recent Developments

Intellectual Property in the Conflict of Laws (Basedow, J. et al. eds), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, p. 39

2004

103. SILBERMAN, L.J.

jurisdictional rules lis pendens United States

A Proposed Lis Pendens Rule for Courts in the United States: The International Judgments Project of the American Law Institute


2004


104. TEITZ, L.E.

jurisdictional rules lis pendens forum non conveniens

Both Sides of the Coin: A Decade of Parallel Proceedings and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Transnational Litigation

Roger Williams University Law Review, Vol. 10, No 1, p.1

2004

105. WEINBERG, I. Conflict of Jurisdictions vs. Conflict of Laws Intercontinental Cooperation Through Private International Law: Essays in Memory of Peter E. Nygh (Einhorn, T. and Siehr, K. eds), T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, p. 489

2004

106. МАТVЕЕV, A. Russia and international treaties on recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments (in Russian)

Moscow Journal of International Law, Vol. 54, No 2, p. 182

2004



The Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments: Transatlantic Lawmaking for Transnational Litigation, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

2003

108. BORRÁS, A.


The 1999 Hague Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments: Agreements and Disagreements

Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale, Vol. 40, No 1, p. 5.

2003


109. BRAND, R.


Concepts Consensus and the Status Quo Zone: Getting to “Yes” on a Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention

Trilateral Perspectives on International Legal Issues: Conflict and Coherence (Carmody, C., Iwasawa, Y. and Rhodes, S. eds), American Society of International Law, Baltimore, p. 71.

2003

110. DREYFUSS, R.C. AND GINSBURG, J.


Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, and Judgments in Transnational Disputes

Computer und Recht International (CRi), No 2, p. 33

2003

111. FAIRLEY, H.S.


In Search of a Level Playing Field: The Hague Project on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

Trilateral Perspectives on International Legal Issues: Conflict and Coherence (Carmody, C., Iwasawa, Y. and Rhodes, S. eds), American Society of International Law, Baltimore, p. 57

2003

112. KONO, T.

Japan commentary on preliminary draft convention

Some Considerations on International Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters from a Japanese Perspective


2003


113. KUR, A. Optionen für ein internationales Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen im Bereich des Immaterialgüterrechts

Festschrift für Winfried Tilmann (Keller, E. et al. eds), W. de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, p. 827

2003

114. KUR, A. Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law and Judgments in Transnational Disputes: A European Perspective

Computer und Recht International (CRi), No 3, p. 65

2003



Theory and Practice of Adjudicatory Authority in Private International Law: A Comparative Study of the Doctrine, Policies and Practices of Common- and Civil-Law Systems. General Course on Private International Law (1996)

Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de La Haye 2002, Vol. 295, p. 9

2003

116. NIELSEN, P.A. Den globale Domskonvention. Quo Vadis? Julebog 2003 (Juridisk Institut ed.), Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, København, p. 113

2003

117. NUYTS, A.


L’exception de forum non conveniens: étude de droit international privé comparé, Bruylant, Bruxelles

2003

118. O’BRIAN JR, W.E.


The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments: The Way Forward;

Modern Law Review, Vol. 66, No 4, p. 491

2003


119. PEREZ, A. Alternatives to the Hague Trilateral Perspectives on International Legal Issues: Conflict and Coherence (Carmody, C., Iwasawa, Y. and Rhodes, S. eds), American Society of International Law, Baltimore, p. 109

2003

120. REED, A.


A New Model of Jurisdictional Propriety for Anglo-American Foreign Judgment Recognition and Enforcement: Something Old, Something Borrowed, Something New?

Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 25, No 2, p. 243

2003

121. WALKER, J.

Canada

Canada’s Position on a Multilateral Judgments Convention


2003

122. BARCELO, J.J.


The Draft Hague Convention's Judgments Provisions

A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from The Hague (Barceló III, J.J. and Clermont, K.M. eds), Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London, New York, p. 237

2002


123. BARCELO, J.J. AND CLERMONT, K.M. (EDS.)


See also General Introduction by the editors A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from The Hague, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London, New York

2002



The proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments: where we are and the road ahead

European Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 4, No 1, p. 219

2002

125. BORRÁS, A. Una nueva etapa en la Conferencia de la Haya de Derecho internacional privado: la elaboración de un Convenio sobre competencia judicial y ejecución de sentencias en materia civil y mercantil

Responsa Jurisperitorum Digesta, Vol. III, p. 45.

2002

126. BRAND, R.

forum non conveniens jurisdictional rules

Comparative Forum Non Conveniens and The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments

Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 37, No 3, p. 467

2002

127. BRAND, R.


Current Problems, Common Ground, and First Principles: Restructuring the Preliminary Draft Convention Text

A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from The Hague (Barceló III, J.J. and Clermont, K.M. eds), Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London, New York, p. 75.

2002


128. BRAND, R.


Jurisdictional Common Ground: In search of a Global Convention

Law and Justice in a Multistate World: Essays in Honor of Arthur T. von Mehren (Nafziger, J.A.R. and Symeonides, S. eds), Transnational Publishers Inc., Ardsley, New York, p. 11.

2002

129. CLAYTON, K.H.

eCommerce commentary on preliminary draft convention

The Draft Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments and the Internet – A New Jurisdictional Framework

John Marshall Law Review, Vol. 36, No 1, p. 223

2002

130. CLERMONT, K.M.


An Introduction to The Hague Convention A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from The Hague (Barceló III, J.J. and Clermont, K.M. eds), Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London, New York, p. 3

2002

131. CLERMONT, K.M. AND HUANG, K.C.


Converting the Draft Hague Treaty into Domestic Jurisdictional Law


2002


132. CRAY, C.

eCommerce consumer commentary on preliminary draft convention

The Enforcers: The Hague Convention and the Threat to Internet Freedoms and Consumer Protection

Multinational Monitor, March 2002, p. 9

2002

133. DODGE, W.S.

scope

Breaking the Public Law Taboo Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 43, p.161

2002

134. DROZ, G.A.L.


Preliminary Draft of the Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: Provisions on Jurisdiction


2002

135. FAWCETT, J.

intellectual property jurisdictional rules

Special Rules of Private International Law for Special Cases: What Should We Do About Intellectual Property?

Reform and Development of Private International Law: Essays in Honor of Sir Peter North (Fawcett, J.J. ed.), Oxford University Press, p. 137

2002

136. FORNER DELAYGUA, J.J.


International Jurisdiction in "Business to Business" On-line Performed Contracts: Lessons from The Hague?

A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from The Hague (Barceló III, J.J. and Clermont, K.M. eds), Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London, New York, p. 47.

2002


137. FRANKLIN, J. AND MORRIS, R.J.

intellectual property jurisdictional rules eCommerce

International Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in the Era of Global Networks: Irrelevance of, Goals for, and Comments on the Current Proposals

Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 77, No 3, p. 1213.

2002

138. GAUDEMET-TALLON, H.


De quelques raisons de la difficulté d’une entente au niveau mondial sur les règles de compétence judiciaire internationale directe

Law and Justice in a Multistate World: Essays in Honor of Arthur T. von Mehren (Nafziger, J.A.R. and Symeonides, S. eds), Transnational Publishers Inc., Ardsley, New York, p. 55

2002

139. GILLIES, L.F.

commentary on preliminary draft convention intellectual property eCommerce

The Impact of the Hague Conference’s Proposed Judgments Convention for Electronic Commerce and Intellectual Property Disputes

International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, Vol. 16, No 3, p. 233

2002

140. GOTTWALD, P.

jurisdictional rules activity-based jurisdiction

Internationale Zuständigkeit kraft “business activities” im geplanten Haager Übereinkommen über Zuständigkeit und ausländische Urteile in Zivil- und Handelssachen

Einheit und Vielfalt des Rechts: Festschrift für Reinhold Geimer zum 65. Geburtstag (Schütze, R. ed.), Beck, Munich, p. 231

2002


141. GOTTWALD, P.

jurisdictional rules activity-based jurisdiction

Jurisdiction based on “business activities” in the Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters

European Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 4, No 1, p. 199

2002

142. HAINES, A.

eCommerce

Why is it so difficult to construct an international legal framework for e-commerce? The Draft Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: A Case Study

European Business Organization Law Review, Vol. 3, No 1, p. 157

2002


jurisdictional rules commentary on preliminary draft convention

Comparative Jurisdiction in the International Context: Will the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention be Stalled?

DePaul Law Review, Vol. 52, No 2, p. 319

2002

144. KUR, A.


International Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments: A Way Forward for IP?

European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR), Vol. 24, No 4, p. 175

2002

145. LICHTENSTEIN, L. International procesret og E-handel Rettid, Vol. 2, p. 112 2002

146. MARKUS, A.R.


Neue Entwicklungen im internationalen Zuständigkeitsrecht

Zum Gerichtsstand in Zivilsachen, Zurich, pp. 127-145

2002


147. MARTIN, M.S.

eCommerce

Keep It Online: The Hague Convention and the Need For Online Alternative Dispute Resolution in International Business-to-Consumer E-Commerce

Boston University International Law Journal, Vol. 20, No 1, p. 125

2002

148. MCCLEAN, D. The Hague Conference’s Judgments Project Reform and Development of Private International Law: Essays in Honor of Sir Peter North (Fawcett, J.J. ed.), Oxford University Press, p. 255

2002

149. MUIR WATT, H.


New Perspectives for Jurisdiction and Judgments Within Europe: A Critical View


2002

150. NAFZIGER, J.A.R. AND SYMEONIDES, S.C. (EDS)

Law and Justice in a Multistate World: Essays in Honor of Arthur T. von Mehren, Transnational Publishers Inc., Ardsley, New York

2002

151. NIELSEN, P.A. Forhandlingerne om en global domskonvention Rettid, Vol. 2, p. 66 2002

152. NOMURA, Y.

activity-based jurisdiction

Activity Based Jurisdiction in the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention: A Japanese Perspective (summary)

Japanese Yearbook of Private International Law, Vol. 4, p. 309

2002


153. NYGH, P.E.


Arthur’s Baby: The Hague Negotiations for a World-Wide Judgments Convention


2002

154. NYGH, P.E.

jurisdictional rules lis pendens | forum non conveniens

Declining Jurisdiction under the Brussels I Regulation 2001 and the Preliminary Draft Hague Judgments Convention: A comparison

Reform and Development of Private International Law: Essays in Honor of Sir Peter North (Fawcett, J.J. ed.), Oxford University Press, p. 303

2002

155. POCAR, F.

Europe commentary on preliminary draft convention

The Drafting of a World-Wide Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments: Which Format for the Negotiations?


2002

156. SEDLMEIER, J. Internationales und europäisches Verfahrensrecht: Neuere Entwicklungen bei der gegenseitigen Urteilsanerkennung in Europa und weltweit

The European Legal Forum (Deutschsprachige Ausgabe), No 1, p. 35.

2002




Can the Hague Judgments Project be Saved?: A Perspective from the United States


2002

158. SILBERMAN, L.J. AND LOWENFELD, A.F.


The Hague Judgments Convention and Perhaps Beyond


2002

159. SIQUEIROS, J.L.

Latin America jurisdictional rules recognition and enforcement rules

Jurisdicción internacional y ejecución de sentencias extranjeras. El proyecto de Convención de la Haya y la perspectiva latinoamericana

El Foro, Vol. XV, No 2, p. 1. 2002

160. TAKAHASHI, K.

contract jurisdictional rules

Jurisdiction in Matters relating to Contract: Article 5(1) of the Brussels Convention and Regulation

European Law Review, Vol. 27, No 5, p. 530

2002


161. TELL, O.


Tentative Draft on the Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Can a Mixed Convention Work?


2002

162. TROOBOFF, P.


Ten (and Probably More) Difficulties in Negotiating a Worldwide Convention on International Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments: Some Initial Lessons


2002

163. VAN LOON, H. The Hague Conference on Private International Law in a time of Globalisation: New Challenges and New Conventions in the fields of Civil Procedure and Applicable Law

Systemwechsel im europäischen Kollisionsrecht, Fachtagung 2001, Munich, pp. 193-203

2002

164. WALTER, G. Der Entwurf für ein weltweites Haager Zuständigkeits- und Vollstreckungs-Übereinkommen aus Schweizer Sicht

Einheit und Vielfalt des Rechts: Festschrift für Reinhold Geimer zum 65. Geburtstag (Schütze, R. ed.), Beck, Munich, p. 1429

2002

165. WENGER, B.

United States antitrust

Binding Gulliver – U.S. Antitrust Jurisdiction and the Hague Convention

"nur, aber immerhin", Festgabe für Anton K. Schnyder, Zurich, pp. 197-215

2002


166. ARAUJO, N. DE

recognition and enforcement rules Latin America

Dispute Resolution in Mercosul: The Protocol of Las Leñas and the Case Law of the Brazilian Supreme Court

The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, Vol. 32, No 1, p. 25

2001

167. BRAND, R.

intellectual property commentary on preliminary draft convention

Intellectual Property, Electronic Commerce and the Preliminary Draft Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention

University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 62, No 4, p. 581.

2001

168. BRAND, R.


Where To From Here? Prospects For A Hague Convention On Jurisdiction And The Enforcement Of Judgments

Mealey’s International Arbitration Report, Vol. 16, No 10, p. 38.

2001

169. BURBANK, S.B.


Jurisdictional Equilibration, the Proposed Hague Convention and Progress in National Law

A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from The Hague (Barceló III, J.J. and Clermont, K.M. eds), Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London, New York, 2002, p. 117, also American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 49, p. 203

2001


170. BYGRAVE, L.A. AND SVANTESSON, D.

jurisdictional rules eCommerce Australia

Jurisdictional Issues and Consumer Protection in Cyberspace: The View from “Down Under”

Paper presented at conference entitled “Cyberspace Regulation: eCommerce and Content”, Sydney, 24 May 2001; available at < http://folk.uio.no/lee/oldpage/articles/CLE_paper.pdf > and < http://www.worldlii.org >

2001

171. DINWOODIE, G.B.


International Intellectual Property Litigation: A Vehicle for Resurgent Comparativist Thought?

American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 49, No 3, p. 429

2001

172. DODGE, W.S.

Scope antitrust commentary on preliminary draft convention recognition and enforcement rules

Antitrust and the Draft Hague Judgments Convention

Law and Policy in International Business, Vol. 32, No 2, p. 363

2001

http://folk.uio.no/lee/oldpage/articles/CLE_paper.pdf

http://folk.uio.no/lee/oldpage/articles/CLE_paper.pdf

http://www.worldlii.org/


173. DOGAUCHI, M.

A View from the Far East Paper presented at the UIA Seminar entitled “The Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Edinburgh, 20-21 April 2001, available at < http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/Dogauchi.pdf > and, slightly modified, at < http://www.j.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~dogauchi/Edinburgh.htm >

2001

174. DOGAUCHI, M.

Jurisdiction over Foreign Patent Infringement from a Japanese Perspective in Consideration of the Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters as of June 2001

The Japanese Annual of International Law, Vol. 44, p. 35

2001

175. DOGAUCHI, M.

Postponing the Diplomatic Conference and Looking for a Way out of the Deadlocked Negotiation: Amendments of the Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments (in Japanese)

Jurist, No 1194, p. 72 2001

http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/Dogauchi.pdf

http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/Dogauchi.pdf

http://www.j.u-tokyo.ac.jp/%7Edogauchi/Edinburgh.htm

http://www.j.u-tokyo.ac.jp/%7Edogauchi/Edinburgh.htm


176. DOGAUCHI, M.

Results of the First Diplomatic Conference Held in June, 2001: Present Situation of the Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments (1) and (2) (in Japanese)

Jurist: No 1211, p. 80; No 1212, p. 87 2001

177. DOGAUCHI, M.

The Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters from a Perspective of Japan

Japanese Yearbook of Private International Law, p. 80

2001

178. DREYFUSS, R.C.

intellectual property commentary on preliminary draft convention

An Alert to the Intellectual Property Bar: The Hague Judgments Convention

University of Illinois Law Review, No 1, p. 421

2001

179. GODDARD, D. Rethinking the Hague Judgments Convention: A Pacific Perspective

Yearbook of Private International Law, Vol. 3, p. 27

2001

180. GRABAU, F.R. AND HENNECKA, J. Entwicklung des weltweiten Zuständigkeits- und Anerkennungsübereinkommens: Aktueller Überblick

Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft (RIW), Vol. 47, No 8, p. 569

2001

181. HANKIN, M.

commentary on preliminary draft convention intellectual property

Proposed Hague Convention would help IP owners

The National Law Journal, Vol. 23, No 48, p. C20

2001


182. HUDLESTON, S.

libel

Preserving Free Speech in a Global Courtroom: The Proposed Hague Convention and the First Amendment

Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, Vol. 10, No 2, p. 403

2001

183. KERAMEUS, K.


The Scope of Recognition of Judgments: Requirements Other Than the Jurisdictional Ones

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments (Lowenfeld, A.F. and Silberman, L.J. eds), Juris Publishing Inc., New York, p. A-45

2001

184. KESSEDJIAN, C. The Hague Global Jurisdiction and Judgments Preliminary Draft Convention

Foundations and Perspectives of International Trade Law (Fletcher, I. et al. eds), Sweet and Maxwell, London, p. 233

2001

185. KUR, A. Immaterialgüterrechte in einem weltweiten Vollstreckungs- und Gerichts-standsübereinkommen - Auf der Suche nach dem Ausweg aus der Sackgasse?

Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil (GRUR Int.), Vol. 50, No 11, p. 908

2001

186. KUR, A. AND STAUDER, D.


Extraterritoriale Jurisdiktion und Streitbeilegung

Geistiges Eigentum im Dienst der Innovation (Schricker, G., Dreier, Th. and Kur, A. eds), Nomos, Baden-Baden, p. 151

2001




Drafting a Convention on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments Acceptable Worldwide: Can The Hague Conference Project Succeed?

A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from The Hague (Barceló III, J.J. and Clermont, K.M. eds), Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London, New York, 2002, p. 281

American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 49, No 2, p. 191

2001



Jurisdictional Requirements: To What Extent Should the State of Origin’s Interpretation of Convention Rules Control for Recognition and Enforcement Purposes?


2001


La rédaction d’une convention universellement acceptable sur la compétence judiciaire internationale et les effets des jugements étrangers : Le projet de la Conférence de La Haye peut-il aboutir ?

Revue critique de droit international privé, No 1, p. 85

2001

190. NIELSEN, P.A. Diplomatkonferencen om en global domskonvention

Rettid, Vol. 1, p. 201 2001

191. NIELSEN, P.A. Haagerkonferencens udkast till global domskonvention

Tidskrift for Rettsvitenskap, p. 158 2001


192. NYGH, P.E.


The Criteria For Judicial Jurisdiction The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments (Lowenfeld, A.F. and Silberman, L.J. eds), Juris Publishing Inc., New York, p. A-1.

2001

193. NYGH, P.E.

commentary on preliminary draft convention jurisdictional rules scope

The Preliminary Draft Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters

International Conflict of Laws for the Third Millennium: Essays in Honor of Friedrich K. Juenger (Borchers, P.J. and Zekoll, J. eds), Transnational Publishers Inc., Ardsley, New York, p. 261

2001

194. PEREZ, A. The International Recognition of Judgments: The Debate between Private and Public Solutions

Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, No 1, p. 44

2001

195. PHILIP, A.

lis pendens forum non conveniens jurisdictional rules

Lis Pendens and Forum Non Conveniens The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments (Lowenfeld, A.F. and Silberman, L.J. eds), Juris Publishing Inc., New York, p. A-55

2001


196. REICH, N. AND GAMBOGI CARVALHO, A.P.

Gerichtsstand bei internationalen Verbrauchervertragsstreitgkeiten im e-commerce – Die EG-Verordnung 44/2001 vom 22.12.2000 und der Haager Konventionsentwurf über die gerichtliche Zuständigkeit und die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung ausländischer Entscheidungen in Zivil- und Handelssachen

Verbraucher und Recht (VuR), Vol. 16, No 8, p. 269.

2001

197. SCHAAFSMA, S.J.


Industriële Eigendom en de Haagse Conferentie voor Internationaal Privaatrecht. Over het Haagse ontwerp-verdrag, torpedo’s en exclusieve rechtsmacht

Bijblad Industriële Eigendom, Vol. 69, No 5, p. 151

2001

198. SCHLOSSER, P.F.


Bases of Jurisdiction in a “New Double Convention” on Jurisdiction and Recognition of Foreign Judgments


2001

199. SILBERMAN, L.J. AND LOWENFELD, A.F.(EDS)

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments, April 30 – May 1, 1999, Juris Publishing Inc., New York

2001


United States

The Related Project of the American Law Institute

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments (Lowenfeld, A.F. and Silberman, L.J. eds), Juris Publishing Inc., New York, p. B-1

2001


201. STÜCKELBERG, M.

lis pendens forum non conveniens

Lis pendens and Forum Non Conveniens at the Hague Conference

Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 26, pp. 949-981

2001

202. TELL, O. The Disconnection Clause: The relationship between the future Hague Judgments Convention and the European instruments;

Paper presented at the UIA Seminar entitled “The Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters”, Edinburgh, 20-21 April 2001, available at < www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/Tell.pdf >

2001

203. THEIS, W.H.

commentary on preliminary draft convention admiralty

Admiralty Proceedings and the Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments

Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, Vol. 32, No 1, p. 59

2001

204. THUM, D.


Internationalprivatrechtliche Aspekte der Verwertung urheberrechtlich geschützter Werke im Internet. Zugleich ein Bericht über eine WIPO-Expertensitzung in Genf

Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Internationaler Teil (GRUR Int), Vol. 50, No 1, p. 9

2001

http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/Tell.pdf

http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/Tell.pdf


205. VAN SCHAACK, B.

human rights

In Defense of Civil Redress: The Domestic Enforcement of Human Rights Norms in the Context of the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention

Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 42, No 1, p. 141

2001

206. WAGNER, R. commentary on preliminary draft convention

Die Bemühungen der Haager Konferenz für Internationales Privatrecht um ein Übereinkommen über die gerichtliche Zuständigkeit und ausländische Entscheidungen in Zivil- und Handelssachen: ein Sachstandsbericht nach dem 1. Teil der Diplomatischen Konferenz;


2001

207. WALTER, G.

lis pendens forum non conveniens

Lis alibi pendens und forum non conveniens: Von der Konfrontation über die Koordination zur Kooperation

Festschrift für Ekkehard Schumann, Tübingen, pp. 559-577

2001

208. WELBERY, B. AND PICHLER, R.J.

commentary on preliminary draft convention eCommerce

Electronic Commerce and the Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters – Putting the Cart Before the Horse

Computer und Recht international (CRi), Vol. 2, No 5, p. 129

2001

209. WIPO


Cross-Border Disputes: International Convention Sought On Cross-Border IP Disputes

World Intellectual Property Report, Vol. 15, No 3, p. 19.

2001


210. BAUMGARTNER, S.P. AND WALTER, G.

recognition and enforcement rules Europe

The Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments Outside the Scope of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions: General Report

The Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Outside the Scope of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions (Walter, G. and Baumgartner, S. eds), Kluwer Law International, The Hague, London, New York, p. 1

2000

211. BLACK, V.

Canada jurisdictional rules recognition and enforcement rules

Commodifying Justice for Global Free Trade: The Proposed Hague Judgments Convention

Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 38, No 2, p. 237

2000

212. BUCHER, A. Vers une convention mondiale sur la compétence et les jugements étrangers

La semaine judiciaire, Vol. 122, No 2, p. 77

2000

213. DOGAUCHI, M.


Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (in Japanese)

Jurist, No. 1172, p. 82 2000

214. HESS, B. Steht das geplante weltweite Zuständigkeits- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen vor dem Aus?

Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax), Vol. 20, No 4, p. 342

2000


215. JUENGER, F.K. Eine Haager Konvention über die Urteilsanerkennung?

Gedächtnisschrift für Alexander Lüderitz (Schack, H. ed.), Beck, Munich, p. 329

2000

216. KESSEDJIAN, C.


Hague Draft Convention on jurisdiction and enforcement of foreign judgements

Law in Transition, Autumn 2000, p. 2 2000

217. KESSEDJIAN, C.


Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: the Draft Convention proposed by the Hague Conference on Private International Law

Forum internationale, n° 26, La Haye, pp. 41-65

2000

218. KOVAR, J.D. A Letter to the Hague Conference on Private International Law

DAJV-Newsletter, No 2, p.44 2000

219. KOVAR, J.D.


Negotiations at The Hague Conference for a Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Civil Judgments

Testimony before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property, Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives, 29 June 2000, available at < http://judiciary.house.gov/legacy/kova0629.htm >.

2000

http://judiciary.house.gov/legacy/kova0629.htm

http://judiciary.house.gov/legacy/kova0629.htm




The Hague Jurisdiction and Enforcement Convention Project Faces an Impasse – A Diagnosis and Guidelines for a Cure


2000

221. MEHREN, A.T. VON AND MICHAELS, R. Pragmatismus und Realismus für die Haager Verhandlungen zu einem weltweiten Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen

DAJV-Newsletter, No 4, p. 124 2000

222. NIELSEN, P.A. Perspektiver for en global domskonvention Juristen, Vol. 82, No 10, p. 382 2000

223. OTTE, K. Scheitert das Haager Zuständigkeits- und Vollstreckungsabkommen?;



United States

A Different Challenge for the ALI: Herein of Foreign Country Judgments, an International Treaty, and an American Statute

Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 75, No 2, p. 635.

2000

225. TRAYNOR, M.


An Introductory Framework for Analyzing the Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: U.S. and European Perspectives

Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law, Vol. VI, p. 1

2000


226. VANDERBLOEMEN, T.E.

human rights United States commentary on preliminary draft convention

Assessing the Potential Impact of the Proposed Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention on Human Rights Litigation in the United States

Duke Law Journal, Vol. 50, No 3, p. 917

2000

227. BEAUMONT, P.R.

jurisdictional rules recognition and enforcement rules Europe

European Court of Justice and jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters

International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 48, No 1, p. 223

1999

228. BRAND, R.

jurisdictional rules United States

Due Process, Jurisdiction and a Hague Judgments Convention

University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 60, No 3, p. 661

1999

229. BRUNS, A. Der anerkennungsrechtliche ordre public in Europa und den USA

Juristenzeitung (JZ), Vol. 54, No 6, p. 278

1999

230. BUONAIUTI, F.M.

forum non conveniens jurisdictional rules

Forum non conveniens: Facing the Prospective Hague Convention and EC Regulation on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters

Rivista di Diritto Europeo, Vol. 39, No 1, p. 3

1999


231. BURBANK, S.B.


Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: End of the Century or Beginning of the Millennium?

Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 7, p. 111

1999

232. CLERMONT, K.M.


Jurisdictional Salvation and the Hague Treaty Cornell Law Review, Vol. 85, No 1, p. 89

1999

233. DOGAUCHI, M.

Significance and Controversial Points regarding the Hague Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments of 2000, (1), (2) and (3) (in Japanese)

NBL: No. 675, p. 12; No. 676, p. 34; No. 679, p.44

1999

234. DOGAUCHI, M.


The Hague Draft of a Mixed Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments of 2000, (1),(2) and (3) (in Japanese)

Jurist: No 1162, p. 107; No 1163, p. 130; No 1164, p.118

1999

235. FLEISCHHAUER, J.

scope

Reasons to include authentic instruments in a worldwide Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters

Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax), Vol. 19, No 4, p. 216

1999

236. FORNER DELAYGUA, J.J.


Hacia un convenio mundial de “exequatur”; Bosch, Barcelona

1999


237. KESSEDJIAN, C. L’avant-projet de convention préliminaire sur la compétence juridictionnelle et les effets des jugements en matière civile et commerciale

International Law FORUM du droit international, Vol. 1, No 3, p. 123

1999

238. MCEVOY, T.


Proposed Hague Convention on International Litigation

Law Institute Journal, Vol. 73, No 4, p. 78

1999

239. MEHLER, F. AND RUOPP, A. Das Haager Abkommen über die Anerkennung ausländischer Entscheidungen in Zivil- und Handelssachen – Pros und Cons – Aktuelle Berichte aus der Verhandlungsrunde Juni 1999;


240. SMITH, T.B.


The Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments;

Revue québécoise de droit international, Vol. 12, No 2, p. 73

1999

241. BEAUMONT, P.R.

United Kingdom commentary on preliminary draft convention

A United Kingdom Perspective on the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention

Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No 1, p. 75

1998


242. BORCHERS, P.J.


A few little issues for the Hague Judgments negotiations


1998

243. BORCHERS, P.J.


Judgments Convention and Minimum Contacts Albany Law Review, Vol. 61, No 4, p. 1161.

1998

244. BRAND, R.

jurisdictional rules tort United States

Tort Jurisdiction in a Multilateral Convention: The Lessons of the Due Process and the Brussels Convention

Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No 1, p. 125.

1998

245. BUCHNER, B. Kläger- und Beklagtenschutz im Recht der internationalen Zuständigkeit, Lösungsansätze für eine zukünftige Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungskonvention

Tübingen 1998

246. JUENGER, F.K. A Hague Judgments Convention? Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No 1, p. 111

1998

247. LUSSIER, L.

Canada

A Canadian Perspective Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No 1, p. 31

1998


248. MAIER, H.G.


A Hague Conference Judgments Convention and the United States Courts: A Problem and a Possibility

Albany Law Review, Vol. 61, No 4, p. 1207

1998



Enforcing Judgments Abroad: Reflections on the Design of Recognition Conventions;


1998

250. PFUND, P.H. The Project of the Hague Conference on Private International to Prepare a Convention on Jurisdiction and Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters


1998

251. SCHACK, H. Entscheidungszuständigkeiten in einem weltweiten Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen

Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (ZEuP), Vol. 6, p. 931

1998

252. WEINTRAUB, R.J. How Substantial is Our Need for a Judgments Recognition Convention and What Should We Bargain Away to Get It?


1998

253. WEINTRAUB, R.J.

jurisdictional rules tort

Negotiating the Tort Long-Arm Provisions of the Judgments Convention


1998


254. ZEKOLL, J.

United States

The Role and Status of American Law in the Hague Judgments Convention Project


1998

255. BRAND, R. Recognition of Foreign Judgments as a Trade Law Issue: The Economics of Private International Law

Economic Dimensions in International Law: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives (Bhandari, J.S. and Sykes, A.O. eds), Cambridge University Press, p. 592.

1997

256. BUCHER, A. La Dix-huitième session de la Conférence de La Haye de droit international privé

Revue suisse de droit international et de droit européen, Vol. 7, pp. 67-127

1997

257. KESSEDJIAN, C. Vers une convention à vocation mondiale en matière de compétence juridictionnelle internationale et d’effets de jugements étrangers

Revue de droit uniforme, p. 675 1997



The Case for a Convention-mixte Approach to Jurisdiction to Adjudicate and Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Vol. 61, No 1, p. 86

1997

259. BRAND, R.


Punitive Damages and the Recognition of Judgments

Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 43, No 2, p. 143.

1996


260. OTTE, K. 1996: Geplante Haager Konvention zu einem weltweiten Anerkennungs- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen,


261. PHILIP, A. Global Convention on Foreign Judgments E Pluribus Unum, Liber Amicorum Georges A.L. Droz (Borrás, A. et al. eds), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, Boston, London, p. 337

1996

262. TROOBOFF, P. Proposed Hague Conference General Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments - Some Thoughts on Finding Solutions to Tough Issues

E Pluribus Unum: Liber Amicorum Georges A.L. Droz (Borrás, A. et al. eds), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, Boston, London, p. 461

1996

263. FASTIFF, B.E.


The Proposed Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments: A Solution to Butch Reynold’s Jurisdiction and Enforcement Problems

Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 28, No 2, p. 469

1995

264. JUENGER, F.K.


A Shoe Unfit for Globetrotting University of California Davis Law Review, Vol. 28, No 3, p. 1027

1995


265. MORSE, C.G.J.


International Shoe v. Brussels and Lugano: Principles and Pitfalls in the Law of Personal Jurisdiction

University of California Davis Law Review, Vol. 28, No 3, p. 999

1995

266. ADLER, M.H. If We Could Build It, Will They Come? - The Need for a Multilateral Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Monetary Judgments

Law and Policy in International Business, Vol. 26, No 1, p. 79.

1994

267. GROTHE, H.


“Exorbitante” Gerichtszuständigkeiten im Rechtsverkehr zwischen Deutschland und den USA


1994

268. KESSEDJIAN, C. Towards a Worldwide Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement? A report on the Special Commission of the Hague Conference on International Law

International Litigation News, p. 8 1994

269. LOWENFELD, A.F. Thoughts about multinational Judgments Convention: Reaction to the Von Mehren Report

Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 57, No 3, p. 289

1994



Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: A New Approach for the Hague Conference?

Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 57, No 3, p. 271

1994


271. COESTER-WALTJEN, D. Die Anerkennung gerichtlicher Entscheidungen in den Haager Übereinkommen

Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Vol. 57, p. 263

1993


United States recognition and enforcement rules

Recognition of United States Judgments Abroad and Foreign Judgments in the United States: Would an International Convention be Useful?


1993

273. SCHACK, H. Hundert Jahre Haager Konferenz für IPR. Ihre Bedeutung für die Vereinheitlichung des Internationalen Zivilverfahrensrechts

Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, Vol. 57, p. 224.

1993

274. SCHACK, H. Perspektiven eines weltweiten Anerkennungs- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommens

Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (ZEuP), Vol. 1, p. 306

1993

275. MEHREN, A.T. VON AND TRAUTMAN, D.T.


Recognition of Foreign Adjudications: A Survey and a Suggested Approach

Harvard Law Review, Vol. 81, p. 1601 1968

276. REGAN, JUSTYNA


Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments - A Second Attempt in the Hague

Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business, Vol. 14, Issue 1 (Summer 2015), pp. 63-90

2015


277. BORCHERS, P.J.


One Step Forward and Two Back: Missed Opportunities in Refining the United States Minimum Contacts Test and the European Union Brussels I Regulation

Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 31, Issue 1 (Spring 2014), pp. 1-20

2014

278. ELBALTI, B.

continuation of the Judgments Project recognition and enforcement rules jurisdictional rules

Spontaneous Harmonization and Liberalization the of the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments

Japanese Yearbook of Private International Law, vol. 16, pp. 264-188

2014

279. REYES, A. continuation of the Judgments Project recognition and enforcement rules

ASEAN and the Hague Conventions Asia Pacific Law Review, Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. 25-44

2014

280. ELBALTI, B. continuation of the Judgments Project recognition and enforcement rules jurisdictional rules

Armonización espontánea de los requisitos para el reconocimiento y ejecución de decisiones judiciales extranjeras y la necesidad de un convenio global sobre decisiones judiciales

Anuario Español De Derecho Internacional Privado, pp. 229-268

2011

bibliography related to the judgments project · the revived judgments project in the hague...

Documents