bich 605 october 6, 8, 20 & 22 larry dangott department of biochemistry and biophysics room 440...

37
BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 [email protected] BICH 605; Fall 2009

Upload: gyles-richards

Post on 11-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

BICH 605

October 6, 8, 20 & 22

Larry Dangott

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Room 440 BioBio

845-2965

[email protected]

BICH 605; Fall 2009

Page 2: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

BICH 605

Planning: Method Development; Strategies Activity Tracking; Fraction ‘pooling’

Techniques: Electrophoresis (SDS, Isoelectric Focusing) Chromatography (GFC, IEX, Affinity, rpHPLC) Structural Characterization (Amino Acid Analysis; Protein

Sequencing) Proteomics (Protein ID and characterization using mass

spectrometry)

To present an OVERVIEW of techniques used in Protein Purification and Analysis.

OUTLINE

Page 3: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

It helps to know something about your protein

1. Source (organism; tissue; organelle; amount)

2. Assemblage vs. monomer

3. Cytosolic vs. membrane-bound

4. Size

5. Isoelectric point (pI)

6. Post-translational modification

7. Relative abundance

Protein Purification

Page 4: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Source (organism; tissue; organelle; amount)

1. Natural vs. Recombinant (tagged?)

2. Tissue (bone (hard), blood (liquid), heart (soft), brain (fatty)); extraction

3. Organelle (nucleus, mitochondria, ER, plasma membrane); pre-fractionation

4. Amount (a LOT or a little; scale); cost and practicality (myoglobin = easy; EGFR = hard)

Protein Purification

Page 5: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Multimer vs. MonomerAffects buffer choices (assembly vs. disassembly)Affects choice of separation media (size)

Cytosol vs. MembraneAffects pre-fractionation choices (extraction)Separation methods (centrifuge, columns)Affects buffer choices (detergent)

Size (sort of related to Multimer vs. Monomer)Affects choice of separation media (GFC)Affects solubility (larger proteins like to precipitate)

Isoelectric point (pI)Affects choice of separation media (charge)Affects solubility (precipitate at pI)Affects buffer choices (precipitation point; charge)

Post-Translational Modification Affects choice of separation media (affinity)

Protein Purification

Page 6: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Important Steps You May Use:

• Extraction (French press, sonication, detergent, homogenization)

• Centrifugation (low speed, ultra-speeds, differential gradient) Protein estimation method (colorimetric, spectroscopy)

• Protein concentrating method (salt or organic precipitation, lyophilization, membrane filtration)

• Chromatography (IEX, gel filtration, chromatofocusing)

• Electrophoresis (IEF, preparative native or SDS)

Protein Purification

Page 7: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Sample Preparation • Extraction (grinding, detergent lysis, sonication)• Salt exchange (gel filtration, filters, dialysis)

Capture• Ion Exchange• Affinity• Hydrophobic Interaction

Intermediate Purification• Ion exchange• Hydrophobic Interaction

Polishing1. Gel Filtration2. Reversed phase

Protein Purification

A COMPLEX STRATEGY FOR PROTEIN PURIFICATION

A SIMPLE STRATEGY

His-tag: affinity

Page 8: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Systematic method development requires.....Defining a way of quantifying, or at least identifying, the presence of your target molecule, and of assessing its purity.

Don’t rely solely on literature (or coworker) statements. Verify yourself. 50% success rate.

Keep a record of your purification process.

Notebook, notebook, notebook………. . . .

Protein Purification

Happy Boss

Page 9: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Our Example: Enzyme Purification

There are two major objectives in enzyme purification:

To obtain the highest SPECIFIC ACTIVITY possible, measured as activity per unit protein

To obtain the MAXIMUM YIELD of enzymatic activity. (Theoretically, this is 100%. Practically, one is usually happy to settle for something like 30%.)

Protein Purification

Page 10: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

When purifying a protein, one wants to keep track of how one is doing relative to the two major objectives.

Therefore, at each step, one must measure: 

1. Volume 2. Protein concentration (colorimetric assay, UV)

3. Enzyme activity (units/ml; specific to ‘your’ protein)

Protein Purification

Page 11: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Protein Purification

These measurements are combined in the calculation of:

Total activity = Enzyme activity/aliquot volume X Total volume

Total protein = Protein/aliquot volume X Total volume

Specific activity = Enzyme activity in an aliquot/Amt of Protein in the aliquot (THIS IS THE BIG ONE)

(In measurements of total activity and protein, remember to adjust for volumes set aside for various reasons. If this is not done, the yield will be artificially low).

Page 12: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Vol X Activity Units/vol = Total Activity Units

Vol X mg/ml = Total Protein (mg)

Calculate Activity Units and Total ProteinUse to calculate Specific Activity

Divide Total Activity Units by Total Protein (mg) = Specific Activity in Units/protein (mg)

Page 13: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Divide current Specific Activity by Initial Specific Activity = Fold Purified

Divide current Total Activity Units by Original Activity Units = % Yield

Fold purification goes UP

Yield goes DOWN

KNOWING WHICH FRACTIONS TO POOL IS IMPORTANT

Page 14: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Selecting Fractions based on Specific Activity and SDS PAGEMutant Tyrosine Hydroxylase; Ion Exchange; NaCl Gradient

Pure Mutant TyrOH has a Vmax of ~12

PoolRNA? Stable?

Data courtesy of Colette Daubner; Fitzpatrick Lab

Page 15: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

The less prevalent the protein is in the cytosol, the higher the degree of purification that will be required for its purification to homogeneity.

For example:A protein that is 50% of the cellular protein needs to

be purified only 2-fold.

In contrast:A protein that is only 0.1% of the cellular protein

needs to be purified 1000-fold.

Protein Purification

Page 16: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

1. Sample Preparation 1. Extraction (grinding, detergent lysis, sonication)2. Salt exchange (gel filtration, filters, dialysis)

2. Capture1. Ion Exchange2. Affinity3. Hydrophobic Interaction

3. Intermediate Purification1. Ion exchange2. Hydrophobic Interaction

4. Polishing1. Gel Filtration2. Reversed phase

Mode of monitoring the purification………………

Protein Purification

A TYPICAL STRATEGY FOR PROTEIN PURIFICATION

Page 17: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Tracking your protein is critically important. How do you know where it is?

Biological Assay (usually specific; extremely sensitive; slower)Binding Assay (usually specific; sensitive, semi-automate)Chemical Assay (colorimetric assays, enzyme assays)Physical Assay (mass spec, UV spectrometry)

Protein Purification

Separation Assay (electrophoresis)

Page 18: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Electrophoresis is a electrically driven sieving process used to separate complex mixtures of proteins. Can be ANALYTICAL or PREPARATIVE.

SDS PAGE is used to investigate subunit composition and to verify homogeneity of protein samples. It can also serve to purify proteins for use in further micro-analytical applications

 Principle of SDS PAGE (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis)

Most proteins bind the ionic detergent, SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate), in a constant weight-to-detergent ratio, leading to identical negative charge density per mass for the denatured proteins and a uniform shape.

Thus, theoretically, SDS-protein complexes migrate through a solid matrix (polyacrylamide) and are separated according to size, not charge.

SDS PAGE ELECTROPHORETIC ANALYSIS OF PROTEINS

Page 19: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

APPLICATIONS Polypeptide composition and fraction profiling:

Purified protein complexes or multimeric proteins consisting of subunits of different molecular size will be resolved into constituent polypeptides. Screen fractions during protein purification.

 Quaternary structure profile:

Comparison of the protein bands obtained under non-reducing and reducing conditions provides information about the molecular size of subunits and protein complexes.

 Size estimation:

The relationship between the relative mobility and log molecular weight is linear over some range. With the use of plots like those shown here, the molecular weight of an unknown protein (or its' subunits) may be determined by comparison with known protein standards.  

SDS PAGE

Page 20: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

SDS PAGE In SDS gel electrophoresis, negatively charged, SDS-coated proteins migrate

in response to an electrical field through pores in a crosslinked polyacrylamide gel matrix

Pore size decreases with higher acrylamide concentrations

Smaller pores are used for smaller proteins/peptides; larger pore sizes are used for larger proteins.

Page 21: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

PROCEDURE

 Proteins to be analyzed are solubilized and denatured by boiling (or heating) in the presence of SDS and reducing reagent, an aliquot of the protein solution is applied to a gel lane, and the individual proteins are separated electrophoretically.

 

The reducing reagent β-Mercaptoethanol (-ME) or (dithiothreitol (DTT)) is added during solubilization to reduce disulfide bonds.

SDS PAGE

Page 22: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

The polyacrylamide gel is cast as a separating gel (sometimes called the resolving or running gel) topped by a stacking gel and secured in an electrophoresis apparatus (see figure).

 The stacking gel is run at slightly acid pH

(6.8). The separating gel is run at pH 8.8. The stacking gel is ~4% acrylamide and the separating gel is a higher concentration.

 

The stacker brings the proteins to a common ‘starting line’ and the separator sieves them apart. The concentration of acrylamide in the separating gel is determined by the range of molecular weights of interest.

SDS PAGE

Page 23: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Tris-Glycine in Upper Buffer

Tris-HCl pH 6.8 in Stacking Gel

Tris-HCl pH 8.8 in Separating Gel

SDS PAGE

Page 24: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Glycine equilibria

SDS PAGE

Page 25: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Formation of an ion front

SDS PAGE

Page 26: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

It is the voltage gradient that sharpens the ion boundary

SDS PAGE

Page 27: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

What happens to proteins?

SDS PAGE

Page 28: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

In separating gel

Glycine mobility increases, becomes greater than protein mobility, but still slower than Cl-

SDS PAGE

Page 29: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Protein sample, now in a narrow band, encounters both the increase in pH and decrease in pore size.

Increase in pH would tend to increase electrophoretic mobility, but smaller pores decrease mobility.

Relative rate of movement of ions in separating gel is chloride > glycinate > protein.

Proteins separate based on charge/mass ratio and on size and shape parameters.

SDS PAGE

Page 30: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

PROTEIN DETECTION

Detection limit Fixing?

 

Coomassie Blue G-250 or R-250 staining 50 ng fixing

 

Silver 1 ng fixing

 

Fluorescent stains (Sypro) 10 ng non-fixing

 

Negative stains (zinc, copper) 1- 10 ng non-fixing

 

SDS PAGE

Coomassie Blue Silver Sypro Ruby

Page 31: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Relative Mobility (Rf)

Mo

lecu

lar

We

igh

t (L

og

Sca

le)

SIZE ESTIMATION

SDS PAGE

IMPORTANT MW ESTIMATION BY SDS-PAGE IS ONLY APPROXIMATE AND IS REFERRED TO AS APPARENT MOLECULAR WEIGHT. Unusual protein compositions or physical properties can cause anomalous mobilities during SDS-PAGE.   SDS gels can be used as a micro-purification step and the individual polypeptides can be isolated from the gel by electroelution or electroblotting and the amino acid sequences can be determined or peptide maps obtained.

Page 32: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

Isoelectric Point (pI) is specific pH at which net charge equals zero

At pI, protein has no net charge and will not migrate in an electric field

IEF is a technique to separate proteinsbased on Isoelectric Point (native or denatured)

Page 33: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Isoelectric Focusing

IEF CAN BE PERFORMED WITH MOBILE pH GRADIENTS OR IMMOBILIZED pH GRADIENTS

Mobile gradients are prepared with Carrier Ampholytes (CAs) (mixed polymers (300-1000 Da in size) mixed with solid support (mobile).

Immobile gradients are prepared by covalently coupling Ampholytes to solid support and blending.

Solid support is usually polyacrylamide but can be agarose for preparative purposes

Page 34: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

IMMOBILIZED pH GRADIENT IEF MOBILE pH GRADIENT IEF

Isoelectric Focusing

ADVANTAGES of IMMOBILIZED GRADIENTS

•Stable pH gradients

•Ease of handling

•Reproducibility

•Extreme pH resolution

Page 35: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Combine IEF & SDS PAGEHigh ResolutionZoom gels (pH range)

Detect isoformsPost-translational modifications

Expression Proteomics

2 Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis

Page 36: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

Combine IEF & SDS PAGE•High Resolution•Zoom gels (pH range)

ANALYTICAL

Detect isoformsPost-translational modifications

PREPARATIVE

Mass spectrometry

2 Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis

Page 37: BICH 605 October 6, 8, 20 & 22 Larry Dangott Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics Room 440 BioBio 845-2965 ljdangott@tamu.edu BICH 605; Fall 2009

END OF DAY 1