bid evaluation - sd department of educationbid evaluation price of eligible services/equipment must...

30
Bid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing and evaluating bids received for eligible services, the applicant must select the most cost-effective bid. This means that the price of eligible products and services must be the primary factor but does not have to be the sole factor. Primary factor means that it must be weighted higher than any other bid evaluation factor. Other relevant evaluation factors may include, but are not limited to: Prior experience including past performance; Personnel qualifications including technical excellence; Management capability including schedule compliance; and Environmental objectives. NOTE: The price factor cannot include ineligible costs. Ineligible services can be included in the evaluation as long as they are in a separate price factor that is weighted less heavily (see Example 2 below).

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Bid Evaluation

Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing and evaluating bids received for eligible services, the applicant must select the most cost-effective bid. This means that the price of eligible products and services must be the primary factor but does not have to be the sole factor. Primary factor means that it must be weighted higher than any other bid evaluation factor. Other relevant evaluation factors may include, but are not limited to:

• Prior experience including past performance; • Personnel qualifications including technical excellence; • Management capability including schedule compliance; and • Environmental objectives.

NOTE: The price factor cannot include ineligible costs. Ineligible services can be included in the evaluation as long as they are in a separate price factor that is weighted less heavily (see Example 2 below).

Page 2: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Example 1: The following example meets program guidelines, as the price of the eligible products and services is weighted higher than any other single factor and does not include any ineligible cost factors:

Factor Weight

Price of the eligible products and services 30%

Prior experience 25%

Personnel qualifications 20%

Management capability 15%

Environmental objectives 10%

Total 100% Example 2: This second example includes an evaluation factor that addresses ineligible costs that an applicant might incur as a result of selecting a particular bid. Note that the price of the eligible products and services is still the primary factor, and the ineligible costs are included in a factor that is weighted less heavily.

Factor Weight

Price of the eligible products and services 30%

Prior experience 25%

Ineligible cost factors 20%

Management capability 15%

Local vendor 10%

Total 100% You should use the factors you choose for your evaluation to construct a bid evaluation matrix. Your matrix will assist you in your evaluation and also provide documentation of your process. No Bids Received? If you do not receive any bids in response to a Form 470, SLD suggests that you keep a written record of this fact. Various review processes, including audits, may occur after your competitive bidding process has ended, and this email or memo may be the only documentation of what happened. If you do not receive any bids after your 28-day waiting period, you can contact service providers to solicit bids and can then review and evaluate any bids received as a result. However, remember that if you post a new Form 470, issue a new Request for Proposal (RFP), or amend your existing RFP, you must extend your allowable contract date by 28-days to allow all vendors a full 28-day bidding period to compose and submit a valid bid.

Page 3: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Keep in mind that your state and local procurement rules may also require you to take certain actions when this situation occurs. As always, you must be in compliance with all of your state and local rules and regulations as well as Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules. One Bid Received? If you receive only one bid, we suggest that you keep a written record of this fact. This will help to document that you did not just keep only the winning bid. Bid Disqualification Factors You can set out specific requirements and disqualify bids that do not meet those requirements as long as you clearly identify the disqualification reasons on your Form 470 and/or your RFP. Disqualification reasons should be determined prior to any substantive bid evaluation. Disqualification reasons cannot be scored on a range, but rather are binary – i.e., the service provider either meets the standard or does not meet the standard. In other words, they must be able to be answered in Yes/No format. The following items are examples of common bid disqualification reasons (but by no means an exhaustive list):

• Service provider must register with the state procurement office. • Service provider must have a Service Provider Identification Number (SPIN) also known as the

service provider’s 498 ID. • Service provider must have a CORES ID (FCC Registration Number). • Service provider must be bonded. • Service provider must offer discounted billing. • Bid not timely received.

If you feature these six requirements as bid disqualification reasons, then bids from service providers that do not meet all of these requirements are disqualified and not evaluated further. The remaining bids must then be evaluated with the price of the eligible products and services as the factor that is weighted most heavily in the bid evaluation. Mandatory Walkthroughs and Bidders Conference as Disqualification Reasons You can require that bidders participate in a walkthrough of your facility or attend a bidders’ conference in order to submit a bid. As long as you have clearly stated in your Form 470 and/or RFP that not attending these events is a reason for disqualification, you can disqualify bids from service providers that were not present at these events. However, you must be sure that all bidders had access to this information and have timely notice so that they have a reasonable opportunity to attend.

Page 4: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Multi-tiered Vendor Evaluations If you use a multi-tiered or multi-round evaluation process, the price of the eligible products and services must be the primary evaluation factor (most heavily weighted) overall. The Best and Final Offer (BAFO) process is considered a multi-tiered evaluation process. The following is an example of such a process: In the first round, the applicant uses the following evaluation criteria:

• Price of eligible services and products (50 points) • Prior experience with the applicant (25 points) • Reference check (25 points)

Bidders that do not receive at least 70 points in the first round are eliminated and not considered any further. In the second round, the applicant uses the following evaluation criteria:

• Price of the eligible products and services (40 points) • Technical solution (35 points) • Price of any ineligible products and services needed in order to make the solution work (25

points)

Although the applicant did not consider bids that did not meet the 70-point threshold, the first round is not a disqualification because bidders were scored subjectively on references and prior experience with the district. In this example, overall the primary factor was the price of the eligible products and services (90 points). In each round, price of E-rate eligible services was considered and was weighted most heavily, so that price was the primary factor considered.

Page 5: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

COMPLETED SAMPLE

Category of Service:  1GB MB Internet Access w/Fiber TransportPossible Points Vendor A Vendor B Vendor C

Total Cost of Eligible Goods/Services $600 $1,000 $1,200% to Lowest bid (low bid cost/bid cost) 100% 60% 50%

Weighted Cost (possible points * % to low bid) 70 70 42 35Ability to Provide Service on July 1 20 15 15 20

Previous Vendor Experience with the District 10 0 0 10

100 85 57 65

*Cost of eligible goods/services must be have more possible points than another other evaluation factor. Although not required, I recommend that it comprise at least 50% of the total points.

Winning Vendor: Vendor ABid Evaluation Conducted By (Name, Title): William Faulkner, District Technology DirectorBid Evaluation Date: 1/5/2019

Page 6: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing
Page 7: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Tariffed Services and Non-Contract Services What are tariffed services? Tariffed services are those data transmission services that have terms and conditions, including pricing, set forth in documents called tariffs that are on file with a state Public Utility Commission (PUC) and/or the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Tariff service refers only to data transmission telecommunications services, and not Internet access service. Internet access service providers are not regulated by state PUCs and do not file tariffs. What are non-contract services? Some telecommunications companies that provide Category 1 data transmission services are not regulated by state public utility commissions and/or do not file tariffs. These companies may offer services on a month-to-month basis and may not require customers to sign a contract. Also, Internet access service providers may offer month-to-month non-contract services. Additionally, some state legislatures may have eliminated the requirement for telecommunications common carriers to file tariffs with the state PUC and these companies may simply provide non-contract services as well.

Under the E-rate program, the SLD does not recognize multi-year tariff arrangements. Multi-year tariff arrangements must be treated as contracts. Only Category 1 services may be provided as a tariff or month-to-month, non-contractual arrangement. All Category 2 services and/or equipment purchases must be purchased pursuant to a signed contract. Please refer to the separate document concerning contracts for more information.

How should tariff and non-contract services be handled on my Form 470? Applicants seeking discounts for services purchased without a contract arrangement – either via a tariff or a price quote from a vendor -- must request bids for these services each year via the Form 470. This 470 posting must be done after the SLD releases the upcoming funding year’s version of the Form 470. Usually the Form 470 for the upcoming funding year becomes available sometime on or around July 1. Some applicants simply rely on July 1 as the earliest date for which they can post their Form 470 for the next year in the case of tariffed or month-to-month services. (For example: if you are seeking E-rate discounts for the program year beginning July 1, 2020, you would normally submit the 470 on or after July 1, 2019).

How should I handle tariffed and non-contract services on my Form 471? After your Form 470 has been posted on the SLD Web Site for 28 days, you must evaluate all bids received and select the most cost-effective bidder. If your current service provider does not submit a bid, you may rely on a recent bill as a bid. If your current service provider offers the most cost effective service, you may continue using this vendor; otherwise, you are required to change vendors to receive service from the most cost effective bidder. Before selecting the most cost-effective vendor, you must consider all proposals received in response to your Form 470.

Page 8: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing
Page 9: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Memo No Competitive Bids

[APPLICANT LETTERHEAD]

TO: FILE FROM: _________________________ DATE: _________________________

Form 470# ______________________________ Services/Equipment Requested _____________________________________________________ In response to the above-referenced Form 470, the Applicant did not receive any bids or proposals for the above-referenced services/equipment. Check if applicable. [ ] The Applicant contacted [insert name of service provider] and obtained a proposal for the services and/or equipment. The Applicant determined that the proposal is a cost effective solution for meeting the Applicant’s educational and technology plan goals in the marketplace and will procure services from this service provider. [ ] The District decided to continue to receive services from its existing service provider at cost-effective prices.

Page 10: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing
Page 11: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Contract Tips

Note: The following is informal unofficial guidance based on experience. It is not intended to provide legal advice. Applicants should consult with your solicitor to ensure that your contracts meet your local requirements. Suggested topics to cover in your contract with a service provider include: Non-E-rate Funding-Out Clauses If you cannot afford to pay 100% of your contract without E-rate discounts, or if you do not want the service or equipment unless you receive E-rate discounts, then you should be certain to include an “out clause” in your contract. Such a clause would include language stating that you intend to apply for E-rate discounts to help pay for the contract, and if you do not receive the full amount of requested E-rate funding, the applicant has the option to cancel the contract without incurring any termination liability. Keep in mind this means you cannot start your service before you receive your Funding Commitment Decisions Letter. Alternatively, the applicant may wish to include language to qualify the “out clause” to have the choice of providing a written notice to proceed, prior to receiving funding approval, subject to the applicant agreeing to pay the full price for services until the funding approval is received. Regulatory Change Clause Include language that allows the applicant to cancel the contract in the event that there is a change to E-rate program rules that fully or substantially rescinds the eligibility of the contract services or equipment for E-rate funding. The parties may negotiate what is meant by “substantially rescinds” by including a monetary threshold or some other objective standard.

Page 12: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Red Light Rule Obtain vendor’s commitment to comply with the FCC Red Light Rule and to confirm they are in good standing with the FCC (not on red light) when the contract is signed. Vendor Under-Investigation Clause If a vendor learns that their company is the subject of an investigation by federal, state, local or any regulatory authority that could have an impact on the applicant’s ability to continue to receive the benefit of E-rate funding, the vendor must notify the applicant within 30 days of learning of such investigation. Applicant reserves the right to cancel the contract without penalty if the investigation impedes the applicant’s ability in any way to receive the benefit of E-rate funding. Contract Extensions Specify options for contract extensions that are of a specific and finite period. Open ended automatic renewals do not meet E-rate requirements for voluntary extensions. Unless the options for extension are set forth in the parties’ contract, no extension may be entered into after the expiration of the contract term. A new Form 470 is required to be posted. For example, a contract that has a 36-month initial term with a one-year extension option is OK while a 36-month contract that automatically renews unless one of the parties cancels the contract is not OK and a new Form 470 would have to be posted.

Page 13: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Prices During Contract Extension Specify that pricing for any extension period will be the same as the initial term of the contract, or that price increases are strictly limited to inflation increases measured, for example, by growth of CPI. Do not allow for open ended pricing language such as “current market rates” for any extension period. Avoid Automatic Contract Renewals Some vendors have standard terms and conditions that prescribe for automatic contract renewals. In order to stop receiving the service, the customer is required to take affirmative steps to notify the vendor prior to the end of the current term that the customer wishes to stop receiving service. Contracts with these clauses can go on indefinitely. The E-rate program does not consider these kinds of renewals to be eligible for funding. Applicants should seek to omit such language from their E-rate contracts and should insist on spelling out exactly how many years of contract extensions may be exercised. Specificity of Contract Language Be sure to include specific language in your contract regarding the quality of work performed, and the schedule of installation or service. Also, be sure to include what the penalties will be for noncompliance with the installation guarantee date or service levels or quality. Specify Discounts or Reimbursements Applicants are permitted the final choice whether to receive discounts on bills or whether to pay their bills in full and submit the Form 472 BEAR to the SLD for reimbursement. Wherever possible, this choice should be established in your contract and 470/RFP to avoid all confusion and to provide the service provider with as much notice as possible. Also, some service providers continue to refuse to provide discounted bills. If this is a non-starter for an applicant, their 470 and/or RFP should make it clear that they will not consider bids from vendors that are not able to discount bills. Payment Schedule If you have terms and conditions under which you will make scheduled payments, such arrangements should be included in your contract (for example, if your vendor wishes to be paid on a quarterly basis or if your vendor would like to receive upfront payments for work such as installation of a new network). Do Not Sign Contract Prior to 28 Days After Form 470 Posting Pay careful attention to not sign a contract or select a service provider before the end of the 28 day 470 waiting period. The contract must be signed and the 471 application must be submitted on or after the Allowable Contract Date which is basically the 29th day after the corresponding 470 is posted on the SLD’s Web site. Contract Expiration Dates

Recurring Services: Every attempt should be made to make sure that contracts do not expire before the end of the upcoming funding year (June 30, 2019). Funding is only provided for services received prior to the Contract Expiration Date. In addition, many schools and libraries have taken advantage of the multi-year contract option which allows them exemption from the 470 posting for the remaining years of the contract. Even with multi-year contracts, be certain they end on June 30.

Non-Recurring Services: Have your contract begin on April 1 and end September 30 instead of June 30. While the funding year ends June 30, FCC rules permit schools and libraries to complete

Page 14: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

the installation of nonrecurring services by September 30. Indicating the September 30 expiration date will alleviate you from having to file a Form 500 to change your date.

Future-Proof Contract Services Specify in your contract the option to increase quantities of service during the contract period. Along with this option, include the prices for the expanded service options. These expanded options should have also been included on your establishing Form 470. Should the applicant wish to increase their quantity of service sometime during the contract term, they may amend the agreement without having to rebid the contract. Such an amendment will be considered a permissible “minor contract modification.” If the contract is silent on increased quantities and the associated prices, this option is not available and the increased quantity of service would have to be rebid on a new Form 470. For example, the initial contract provides for service at 1 Gbps, and also specifies that the customer has the option to amend the agreement to purchase additional bandwidth up to 10 Gbps and the price for the additional bandwidth is set forth for 2 Gbps, 5 Gbps and 10 Gbps. The customer may opt to purchase the increased bandwidth as a minor contract modification. If, however, the contract was open ended and stated that the customer may choose to purchase additional service and the price will be negotiated, this language would not meet the “minor contract modification” test and the additional service would need to be rebid on a new Form 470.

Page 15: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Service Provider Information Numbers (SPINs)

The SPIN is a unique number assigned to each service provider by USAC and serves as USAC's tool to ensure that approved funding is directed to the correct service provider. Form 471 applicants MUST have the SPIN of each service provider listed in the Form 471 in order to successfully complete the Form 471.

How to Find Your Service Provider’s SPIN Go to “Tools” from the SLD website: www.usac.org/sl

There are two ways to search for a SPIN number and SPIN contact information:

A

B

Page 16: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

A) Service Provider Download Tool (also found directly at

https://data.usac.org/publicreports/SpinDownload/Spin/Download) This database provides the following information for a service provider:

• SPIN Number • Service Provider Name • Doing Business as Name (if different from Service Provider Name) • SPIN Status • Contact Name • Contact Email • Contact Phone • Whether the service provider has filed a current SPAC Form 473 (Annual Service

Provider Certification Form) with the SLD

Enter your search criteria then select “Search”. If you wish to view and download all service provider data do not enter any search criteria.

Page 17: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Click on the hyperlink for the SPIN to view all details associated with a service provider. You can download all data in a CSV (commas separated value) file by clicking the “Export” button.

B) Search for SPIN Information (also found directly at http://www.sl.universalservice.org/Forms/SPIN_Contact_Search.asp).

This database provides the following information for a service provider:

• SPIN Number • Service Provider Name • Doing Business As Name (if different from Service Provider Name)

Page 18: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

• Contact Name • Contact Address • Contact Phone • Whether the service provider is an Eligible Telecommunications Provider (“Y” in Form

499 Filer Column) • Whether the service provider has filed a current SPAC Form 473 (Annual Service

Provider Certification Form) with the SLD. This search tool is not as robust and doesn’t contain the e-mail address of the contact, nor the additional information for the company via hyperlink. The search results also cannot be downloaded into a .csv file.

Page 19: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Companies with Multiple SPINs: Some companies may have more than one SPIN because of various divisions within a company. In these cases, the applicant may need to contact the service provider directly to identify the appropriate SPIN to use for the applicant’s funding request on Form 471. What is a Form 473 SPAC? The Form 473 SPAC is the Annual Service Provider Certification Form that must be submitted by every SPIN for every funding year. If no SPAC (Form 473) is filed for a certain funding year, no funds can be disbursed to that vendor and no BEAR payments will be disbursed to applicants related to that vendor.

Page 20: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing
Page 21: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Crea

ting

Cont

ract

Re

cord

s in

EPC

2

You

are

here

in th

e E-

rate

proc

ess:

Plan

Sept

-O

ct

Upda

te

Entit

y Pr

ofile

sO

ct -

Dec

Bid

(470

)Au

g -J

an

Bid

Eval

uatio

nSe

pt -

Feb

Sign

Co

ntra

ctJa

n -

Feb

Appl

y to

US

AC (4

71)

Jan

-Mar

Appl

icat

ion

Revi

ew

(PIA

)Ap

r -Au

g

Fund

ing

Com

mitm

ent

(FCD

L)Ap

r -Au

g

Turn

-On

Fund

ing

(486

)Ap

r ---

Purc

hase

Se

rvic

es o

r Eq

uipm

ent

Pay

Vend

or

Requ

est R

eim

burs

emen

t fro

m U

SAC

(472

/BEA

R)

if di

scou

nts n

ot o

n ve

ndor

in

voice

Crea

te

Cont

ract

Re

cord

Purp

ose

of C

ontr

acts

Mod

ule

•Du

ring

the

crea

tion

of a

For

m 4

71, e

ach

FRN

requ

ires y

ou to

indi

cate

how

you

w

ill b

e pu

rcha

sing

the

requ

este

d se

rvice

s –ei

ther

via

a co

ntra

ct, t

ariff

or

Mon

th-to

-Mon

th (M

TM):

•In

stea

d of

ent

erin

g th

e bi

ddin

g/co

ntra

ct in

form

atio

n as

par

t of t

he F

orm

471

ap

plica

tion,

this

info

rmat

ion

is en

tere

d in

EPC

as a

Con

trac

t Rec

ord

(CR)

–A

singl

e Co

ntra

ct R

ecor

d is

crea

ted

each

tim

e a

new

cont

ract

is si

gned

That

Con

trac

t Rec

ord

is th

en re

fere

nced

to th

e ap

plica

ble

FRN

•Cr

eate

Con

trac

t Rec

ords

in th

e Co

ntra

cts M

odul

e be

fore

star

ting

the

Form

471

•No

info

rmat

ion

shou

ld b

e en

tere

d in

the

Cont

ract

s Mod

ule

for M

TM F

RNs

3

Whe

n to

/Not

to C

reat

e a

New

Co

ntra

ct R

ecor

dW

hen

TOCr

eate

a N

ew C

ontr

act R

ecor

d•

New

ly si

gned

cont

ract

s–

Crea

te a

new

Con

trac

t Rec

ord

each

tim

e yo

u sig

n a

new

cont

ract

–Do

not

crea

te a

CR

for e

ach

year

of t

he co

ntra

ct•

Erro

rs o

n pr

evio

usly

-sub

mitt

ed C

ontr

act R

ecor

ds–

If yo

u no

tice

that

any

dat

a in

you

r Con

trac

t Rec

ord

from

last

yea

r is i

nacc

urat

e (s

uch

as th

e 47

0 #,

SPI

N #,

vol

unta

ry e

xten

sions

, etc

), cr

eate

a n

ew C

R an

d re

fere

nce

the

accu

rate

Con

trac

t Rec

ord

on y

our F

RN (i

gnor

ing

the

old

one)

–Th

ere

is no

way

to e

dit a

n ex

istin

g Co

ntra

ct R

ecor

d af

ter i

t’s b

een

subm

itted

•Lik

ewise

, the

re’s

no w

ay to

del

ete

a su

bmitt

ed C

R (it

will

just

die

on

the

vine

)

Whe

n NO

Tto

Cre

ate

a Ne

w C

ontr

act R

ecor

d–

If yo

u cr

eate

d a

Cont

ract

Rec

ord

in a

pre

viou

s yea

r for

a m

ulti-

year

cont

ract

, do

not

crea

te a

new

one

. Ju

st re

fere

nce

the

orig

inal

Con

trac

t Rec

ord

whe

n cr

eatin

g yo

ur 4

71–

If yo

ur p

revi

ous C

ontr

act R

ecor

d co

ntai

ned

volu

ntar

y ex

tens

ions

, and

you

wish

to

exe

rcise

one

of t

hose

ext

ensio

ns fo

r FY

2020

, do

not c

reat

e a

new

CR

•Si

mpl

y ch

ange

the

Cont

ract

Exp

iratio

n Da

te in

the

FRN

whe

n yo

u cr

eate

you

r For

m 4

71

4

Page 22: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Cont

ract

Rec

ords

–Ad

ditio

nal D

etai

ls

•Up

load

ing

Actu

al C

ontr

acts

in C

R–

Alth

ough

the

syst

em a

sks i

f you

wan

t to

uplo

ad a

copy

of y

our s

igne

d co

ntra

ct in

to E

PC,

you

aren

’t re

quire

d to

do

so–

How

ever

, I h

ighl

y re

com

men

d th

at yo

u up

load

copi

es o

f all

signe

d Ca

tego

ry 2

cont

ract

sas

PIA

rout

inel

y as

ked

for t

hem

last

year

if th

ey w

eren

’t pa

rt o

f you

r CR.

•Co

ntra

ct E

xpira

tion

Date

s–

The

Cont

ract

Mod

ule

does

n't a

sk fo

r the

Con

trac

t Exp

iratio

n Da

te (C

ED) -

-thi

s dat

a el

emen

t mus

t be

ente

red

in e

ach

fund

ing

requ

est w

ithin

the

Form

471

itse

lf–

Why

? B

ecau

se d

ue to

vol

unta

ry e

xten

sions

in so

me

cont

ract

s, it’

s pos

sible

that

the

CED

can

chan

ge fr

om y

ear t

o ye

ar

•Be

Pre

pare

d–

It’s a

goo

d id

ea to

hav

e th

e in

form

atio

n in

-han

d. U

se th

e CR

Dat

a sp

read

shee

t to

com

pile

th

e re

quire

d da

ta p

rior t

o st

artin

g th

e Co

ntra

ct M

odul

e

5

Whe

re Is

the

Cont

ract

Mod

ule?

From

the

EPC

Land

ing

Page

, cli

ck o

n th

e na

me

of y

our

entit

y fro

m e

ither

loca

tion:

-Ne

xt to

“Wel

com

e”-

Top

of M

y En

titie

s list

6

Whe

re Is

the

Cont

ract

Mod

ule?

•Th

en cl

ick o

n Co

ntra

cts o

n th

e to

p to

olba

r

7

Navi

gatio

n to

“Man

age

Cont

ract

s”Cl

ick o

n th

e “M

anag

e Co

ntra

cts”

but

ton

Click

on

the

“Add

a N

ew C

ontr

act”

but

ton

8

Page 23: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Cont

ract

Info

rmat

ion

A de

scrip

tive

nick

nam

e of

cont

ract

will

hel

p yo

u id

entif

y it

late

r. H

int:

Use

a re

ally

goo

dni

ckna

me!

Fo

r exa

mpl

e: “

Year

cont

ract

sign

ed –

Vend

or N

ame

-ser

vice

/equ

ipm

ent t

ype”

“202

0 –

ABC

Vend

or –

Switc

hes”

Ente

r con

trac

t num

ber,

N/A

or le

ave

blan

k. T

his i

s op

tiona

l

9

optio

nal

Cont

ract

Upl

oads

A nu

mbe

r is a

ssig

ned

by th

e sy

stem

.

Sele

ct Ye

s or N

o de

pend

ing

on w

heth

er y

ou a

re g

oing

to u

ploa

d a

copy

of y

our c

ontra

ct.

If Ye

s is s

elec

ted,

syst

em w

ill p

rom

pt y

ou to

up

load

the

elec

tron

ic fil

e fro

m y

our c

ompu

ter.

EPC

allo

ws y

ou to

, but

doe

s not

requ

ire y

ou, t

o up

load

a co

py o

f you

r con

trac

t.

10

Note

: Up

load

C2

cont

ract

s bec

ause

PIA

w

ill a

sk y

ou fo

r the

m

anyw

ay.

Cont

ract

Upl

oads

A de

scrip

tion

may

be

adde

d fo

r eac

h up

load

ed co

ntra

ct

docu

men

t.

Mul

tiple

doc

umen

ts re

late

d to

the

sam

e co

ntra

ct

may

be

uplo

aded

.

11

Cont

ract

Info

rmat

ion

Mos

tly li

kely

ans

wer

is N

o.

Mos

tly li

kely

ans

wer

is N

o.

12

Page 24: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Cont

ract

Info

rmat

ion

Mos

tly li

kely

ans

wer

is N

o.

13

Mos

tly li

kely

ans

wer

is N

o.

Esta

blish

ing

Form

470

/# B

ids

Click

on

the

“Yes

” but

ton

to

indi

cate

you

pos

ted

a Fo

rm 4

70.

Ente

r the

num

ber o

f bid

s re

ceiv

ed.

It’s i

mpo

rtan

t tha

t you

ge

t thi

s rig

ht in

case

you

are

eve

r as

ked

durin

g PI

A or

in a

n au

dit t

o su

pply

the

win

ning

and

losin

g bi

ds.

14

Esta

blish

ing

Form

470

–Tr

icky!

If th

e Fo

rm 4

70 w

as p

oste

d as

of F

Y 20

16 o

r la

ter,

(sin

ce E

PC w

as cr

eate

d), s

elec

t “NO

” and

th

en se

arch

from

470

s in

EPC.

If th

e Fo

rm 4

70 w

as p

oste

d pr

ior t

oFY

201

6,

sele

ct “

Yes”

and

the

syst

em w

ill p

rom

pt y

ou to

m

anua

lly e

nter

the

Form

470

#.

15

Be ca

refu

l to

choo

se th

e co

rrec

t ans

wer

!

Sear

chin

g EP

C fo

r the

Est

ablis

hing

For

m 4

70

Loca

te a

ll of

your

FY

2016

-FY

202

0 Fo

rm 4

70s b

y cli

ckin

g “S

earc

h”

Then

sele

ct th

e ch

eck

box

for t

he a

pplic

able

470

.

16

Page 25: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Form

470

s Pos

ted

Prio

r to

FY 2

016

Note

: If y

ou se

lect

“Yes

, tha

t the

470

was

pos

ted

prio

r to

FY

2016

, you

will

man

ually

ent

er th

e 47

0 #

(or

copy

and

pas

te it

from

you

r pre

viou

s 471

or F

CDL.

) Ente

r the

For

m 4

70 N

umbe

r. Ch

eck

this

num

ber c

aref

ully

for a

ccur

acy.

17

Serv

ice P

rovi

der I

nfor

mat

ion

Ente

r acc

ount

num

ber i

f you

hav

e on

e.

Opt

iona

l fie

ld th

at m

ay b

e le

ft bl

ank.

Ente

r the

SPI

N or

Nam

e of

the

Serv

ice P

rovi

der a

nd

then

Sea

rch.

18

optio

nal

Serv

ice P

rovi

der I

nfor

mat

ion

Resu

lts m

atch

ing

the

crite

ria y

ou u

sed

will

app

ear i

n a

list.

Se

lect

corr

ect S

PIN

or cl

ear f

ilter

and

sear

ch a

gain

.

19

Cont

ract

Dat

es

Need

to ch

oose

“Ye

s” o

r “N

o” fo

r Mul

ti-Ye

ar C

ontr

act

20

Ente

r Con

trac

t Aw

ard

Date

Wor

ds o

f Cau

tion:

Your

Con

trac

t Aw

ard

Date

m

ust b

e on

or a

ftert

he A

llow

able

Con

trac

t Da

te (w

hich

is th

e 29

thda

y af

ter y

ou p

oste

d yo

ur 4

70) a

nd b

efor

eth

e fil

ing

and

cert

ifica

tion

date

of t

he F

orm

471

.

Page 26: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Cont

ract

s w/L

imite

d Ex

tens

ions

Sele

ct “N

o” if

cont

ract

has

no

exte

nsio

ns.

Sele

ct “

Yes”

if co

ntra

ct h

as li

mite

d #

of e

xten

sions

ava

ilabl

e.

# of

ext

ensio

ns re

mai

ning

on

the

cont

ract

(s

tate

d in

# o

f yea

rs)

21

Prov

ide

last

pos

sible

cont

ract

ex

pira

tion

date

if a

llex

tens

ions

ar

e us

ed

# of

mon

thsr

emai

ning

on

the

cont

ract

if a

ll ex

tens

ions

wer

e to

be

used

(inc

lude

mon

ths i

n up

com

ing

fund

ing

year

)

Prici

ng C

onfid

entia

lity

Alw

ays s

elec

t “No

” to

indi

cate

ther

e is

no le

gal r

estr

ictio

n to

pre

vent

the

publ

icatio

n of

th

e pr

icing

info

rmat

ion

for t

he co

ntra

ct.

Wor

d of

Cau

tion:

The

re m

ust b

e an

act

ual s

tatu

te in

pla

ce in

ord

er to

ans

wer

“Ye

s.” It

is

not p

erm

issib

le fo

r the

ven

dor t

o sim

ply

stat

e th

at th

eir p

ricin

g is

conf

iden

tial.

22

Conf

irmat

ion

Page

A su

mm

ary

page

with

the

cont

ract

info

rmat

ion

will

be

disp

laye

d.

If th

e in

form

atio

n ne

eds

to b

e re

vise

d, se

lect

“Sav

e an

d Cl

ose”

and

you

can

then

retr

ieve

the

draf

t in

form

atio

n an

d ed

it it.

If th

e in

form

atio

n is

corr

ect,

and

you

wan

t to

final

ize th

e su

bmiss

ion,

se

lect

“Com

plet

e.”

Wor

d of

Cau

tion:

Onc

e su

bmitt

ed, t

he

info

rmat

ion

cann

ot b

e de

lete

d or

revi

sed.

23

List o

f Sub

mitt

ed C

ontr

act R

ecor

ds

Subm

itted

cont

ract

s app

ear i

n th

e Co

ntra

cts R

ecor

ds Li

st a

nd w

ill b

e av

aila

ble

for s

elec

tion

whe

n fil

ing

a Fo

rm 4

71

24

Page 27: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

Editi

ng o

r Del

etin

g a

Draf

tCon

trac

tFr

om y

our L

andi

ng P

age,

sele

ct E

ntity

Nam

e, th

en “C

ontr

act”

and

then

“Man

age

Cont

ract

s.”Th

e lis

t of d

raft

cont

ract

s will

app

ear.

Che

ck th

e bo

x fo

r the

dra

ft an

d se

lect

“Edi

t” o

r “De

lete

.” No

te:

Subm

itted

cont

ract

s can

not b

e ed

ited

or d

elet

ed.

25

Page 28: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing
Page 29: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

USAC Contract Guidance In general, a contract is a binding agreement, enforceable by law, between two or more parties that creates an obligation to do, or not do, something. Contract definitions and requirements are contained in each state's or territory’s contract law. Except for services to be delivered under non-contracted, tariffed or month-to-month arrangements, applicants must sign a contract or other legally binding agreement with the service provider before submitting a completed Form 471 (Description of Services Ordered and Certification Form). Applicants must be able to demonstrate that they had a signed and dated contract or other legally binding agreement in place at the time they submitted a completed Form 471. Applicants also must comply with state and/or local contract law. Obtaining the service provider signature and date is not a program requirement, but state and/or local contract law may include this or other compliance requirements. A verbal agreement is not considered a legally binding agreement. Contract Signatures and Examples Examples of acceptable standards for applicant signature and date in a contract are:

• Applicant’s handwritten signature and date of signing • Date contract awarded in the body of the contract • Date contract awarded in the opening statements of the contract

When state and/or local contract law does not require the applicant to sign and date the contract, the applicant will be given the opportunity to complete a certification statement that affirms that the applicant is compliant with its state and/or local contract law. Verbal agreements and quotes do not meet FCC requirements. Purchase orders may constitute enforceable contracts under state and/or local contract law. We recommend that if applicants intend to use a purchase order as their contract, they check their state and/or local contract laws to ensure that purchase orders meet state and/or local contract requirements and is considered to be a legally binding agreement. Types of Contracts Multi-year Contracts or Contracts with Voluntary Extensions A multi-year contract is a contract that covers more than one year. For example, a three-year contract is a multi-year contract that would expire at the end of the third year. A contract including voluntary extensions is a contract that expires at the end of its original term, but that may be voluntarily extended for one or more years pursuant to the provisions in the contract. The decision to extend a contract with voluntary extensions must occur before the FCC Form 471 is filed for the funding year when the contract would otherwise expire.

Page 30: Bid Evaluation - SD Department of EducationBid Evaluation Price of ELIGIBLE services/equipment must be the primary factor when constructing the evaluation of bid responses. When reviewing

In the event the contract does not indicate voluntary extensions, the contact cannot be extended beyond its original expiration date without posting a new Form 470. Non-Recurring Service Voluntary Extensions FCC rules grant a limited extension of the competitive bidding rules for contracts for non-recurring services. Contracts for non-recurring services may be voluntarily extended to coincide with the appropriate deadline for the implementation of delivery and installation for non-recurring services, as long as the terms and conditions of the contract and applicable state or local contract rules allow for the extension. Parties may not, however, extend other contractual provisions beyond the dates established by the Commission's rules without complying with the competitive bidding process.

If an applicant is granted an extension of time for delivery and installation of non-recurring services, the applicant may extend the relevant contract without rebidding. Applicants must file an FCC Form 500 to notify USAC of the revised contract expiration date. Multi-Year Contracts for Newly-Eligible Services If the original Form 470 or RFP did not include the newly-eligible services, the applicant will be required to post a new Form 470 for those services. EPC Contract Module After a contract is signed, a “contract record” must be created in the EPC Contract Module. The contract itself is not required to be uploaded, but all of the details related to that contract must be provided in the record. These details include:

• Form 470 number used to procure the service • Contract signing date • Contract expiration date • Whether voluntary extensions are included, and if so, how many

When the Form 471 is created, the system will ask whether the service is a MTM service or a contract service. If it’s a contracted service, the system will ask which contract in the Contract Module corresponds to that particular Funding Request. The most beneficial aspect to the Contract Module is that applicants do not have to enter and re-enter contract data for each FRN and for each funding year.