big idea and characteristic #2: collaborative teams

43
Big Idea and Characteristic #2: Collaborative Teams

Upload: etenia

Post on 15-Feb-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Big Idea and Characteristic #2: Collaborative Teams. Collaborative Teams People….. Process…… Tasks. “. What is collaboration?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Big Idea and Characteristic #2: Collaborative Teams

Page 2: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Collaborative TeamsPeople….. Process…… Tasks

Page 3: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

What is collaboration?

A systematic process in which we work together, interdependently, to analyze and impact professional practice in order to improve our individual and collective results.DuFour, Eaker, & DuFour

Page 4: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Simply being collaborative does not make change

Members of a Learning

Community must call on each other’s knowledge, skills, and aspirations to address their goal.

Page 5: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Great Teams – “What have they got?”

• Think about great teams you have been on.

• What were some of the attributes that created a great team experience?

• Discuss how those same attributes can be part of what we do in our collaborative teams at school.

Page 6: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

What does it mean to

collaborate?

Page 7: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

HorseNoseAnvilClock

“The best place to succeed is where you are with what you’ve got.”--Charles M. Schwab

Page 8: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Five Dysfunctions of TeamsPatrick Lencioni

• Absence of Trust• Fear of Conflict• Lack of Commitment• Avoidance of Accountability• Inattention to Results

Page 9: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

INATTENTION TO

RESULTS

ABSENCE OF

TRUST

Patrick LencioniThe Five Dysfunctions of a Team

Page 10: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

INATTENTION TO

RESULTS

AVOIDANCE OF

ACCOUNTABILITY

LACK OF

COMMITMENT

FEAR OF

CONFLICT

ABSENCE OF

TRUST

Patrick LencioniThe Five Dysfunctions of a Team

Handouts

Page 11: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Collaborative Culture

“Educators who are building a professional learning community recognize that they must work together to achieve their collective purpose of learning for all. Therefore, they create structures to promote a collaborative culture.”

Richard DuFourON COMMON GROUND

Page 12: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

NORMS

The standards of behaviors by which we agree to operate while we are in this group.

Page 13: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Meeting Agenda and Logs

Handout

Page 14: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Meeting Agenda for ________________________________________ Meeting Date: _____________Time:__________Place: __________________ Meeting Facilitator: _________________________________________ Meeting Participants Meeting Tasks Time Objective Results/Follow-up 5 minutes Meet, greet, review norms and

previous meeting minutes.

Task 1

Task 2

Task 3

5 minutes

Closure, determine resource needs for next time and assign follow-up tasks

Page 15: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Collaborate about what?

If we want our school improvement efforts to have a significant impact on student learning, we should focus those efforts on the factors that significantly impact learning.

Page 16: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

The Learning Environment

Curriculum

AssessmentInstruction

Key Areas of Focus

Page 17: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Four Corollary Questions

–What do we want students to learn?

–How will we know that they have learned it?

–What will we do if they don’t?

–What will we do if they do?

Page 18: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

What does it feel like?

• Exciting• Professional• Ah Ha’s• You are part of something

bigger• You have a hand in

designing and implementing the “next best thing”

Page 19: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

What does it look like?

Creating Common AssessmentsExamining student workDeveloping SMART GoalsAligning Curriculum,

Instruction and AssessmentEnhancing School Climate Defining Grading PracticesIncreasing Community

Involvement

Page 20: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

“Teachers of the same course or level should have absolute common agreement on what they expect all their students to know and be able to do.”

(Reeves)

Page 21: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Common Assessment • Agreement on essential skills• Agreement on the method of assessing those

skills (knowledge, reasoning, performance, product)

• Agreement on standard of measurement• Agreement on level of proficiency• Created in collaboration with team members• Agreement to examine results to form

instruction and design interventions for mastery.

Page 22: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Why Common Assessments?

What are the benefits?• Efficiency• Fairness• Effective

Monitoring• Informed

practice

• Assessment literacy

• Raised expectations

• Team capacity• Collective

ResponseModified from R. DuFour keynote address at PLC Institutes

Page 23: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Utilize your common assessment data to guide your targeted

student interventions

Page 24: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Classroom Performance Summary ReportScience7 - Genetics Unit Test B

Classroom Proficiency

Far Below Basic

Below Basic

Basic Proficient Advanced

0.00% 0.00% 6.67% 13.33% 80.00%

Page 25: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Classroom Performance Summary ReportScience7 - Genetics Unit Test B

Student Name Number Correct Percent Correct

Student 1 30 100%

Student 2 29 96.67%

Student 3 13 43.33%

Student 4 30 100%

Student 5 19 63.33%

Student 6 30 100%

Student 7 27 90%

Student 8 28 93.33%

Student 9 25 83.33%

Student 10 25 83.33%

Student 11 30 100%

Student 12 30 100%

Student 13 25 83.33%

Student 14 30 100%

Student 15 30 100%

Averages: 26.2 87.33%

Page 26: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Classroom Performance Summary ReportScience7 - Genetics Unit Test B

Student Name NumberCorrect

PercentCorrect

LS2.d

LS2.c

LS2.a

LS2.b

LS2.e

Student 1 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Student 2 29 96.67% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100%

Student 3 13 43.33% 33% 0% 100% 100% 100%

Student 4 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Student 5 19 63.33% 33% 33% 100% 100% 100%

Student 6 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Student 7 27 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Student 8 28 93.33% 67% 67% 100% 100% 100%

Student 9 25 83.33% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Student 10 25 83.33% 100% 33% 100% 100% 100%

Student 11 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Student 12 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Student 13 25 83.33% 33% 67% 100% 100% 100%

Student 14 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Student 15 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Averages: 26.2 87.33% 82% 78% 100% 97% 100%

Page 27: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Classroom Performance Summary ReportScience7 - Genetics Unit Test B

Teacher A

Teacher B

Teacher C

Teacher D

Teacher E

LS2.d 82% 89% 90% 90% 79% 86%

LS2.c 100% 75% 80% 82% 71% 82%

LS2.a 100% 100% 100% 100% 73% 95%

LS2.b 97% 93% 96% 100% 82% 94%

LS2.e 100% 83% 86% 91% 80% 88%

ClassAverages:

96% 91% 90% 88% 77% 89%

Page 28: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Big Idea Number 3Results-Oriented

Don’t tell me you believe “all kids can learn”… tell me what you’re doing about the kids who aren’t learning.-- Rick DuFour

Characteristics 3 -63.Collective Inquiry4.Action Orientation

and Experimentation

5.Commitment to Continuous Improvement

6.Results Oriented

Page 29: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Collective Inquiry• Relentless questioning of the status

quo• Seeking new methods & testing them• Reflecting on results• Maintaining a sense of curiosity and

an openness to new possibilities• Recognizing that the process of

searching for answers is more important than having the answers

Page 30: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Action Orientation and Experimentation

• Are students assured EXTRA TIME and SUPPORT for learning?

• Is our response TIMELY? • Is our focus PROMPT

INTERVENTION rather than sluggish remediation?

• Is our response DIRECTIVE rather than invitational?

• Is our response SYSTEMATIC?

Page 31: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Commitment to Continuous Improvement

Writing Data-Driven Accountable Goals to Address Problem Areas

Page 32: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Goals• Monitored continuously

• Designed to produce short term Focus on the desired outcome

• wins• Linked to the Vision

Page 33: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Writing SMART Goals

S: Strategic and SpecificM: MeasurableA: AttainableR: Results Oriented for StudentsT: Time Bound

Anne Conzemius and Jan O’NeillTHE HANDBOOK FOR SMART SCHOOL TEAMS, ASCD, 2001

Page 34: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

SMART Goal (Specific, measurable. Attainable, results oriented, and timebound):

Team: Second Grade Team Date: Sept 26, 2006 Focus Area: Oral Reading Fluency SMART Goal: 22/47 students who scored at the At Risk and Some Risk categories on the initial DIBELS assessment, will move up one level by May of 2007. Action Steps (What will be done?)

Designation (Who will do it?)

Timeframe (When will it be done?)

Results (The Evidence)

Teachers will use Readers’ Theater instructional strategies to work on ORF Teachers will use Poetry as an instructional tool to address ORF Using in-class Fluency Center, students make their own graphs to plot progress in ORF Teachers will use the Learning Lab to focus on ORF Teachers will use Leveled Readers in center work to focus on ORF. Teachers will use Accelerated Reader time to pull students to work on ORF Teachers will develop materials and a Homework connection plan for parents to be involved in fluency activities

Jill, Amy All Teachers All teachers Kim, All teachers All Teachers All Teachers All Teachers

Sept 2006 Oct 2006 Oct 2006 Sept 2006 Sept 2006 Oct 2006 Oct 2006

Lesson objectives Lesson Objectives Lesson objectives, center materials, data charts Class roster, specific ORF materials Lesson objectives for groups Lesson objectives Homework plan, ORF materials for parents

Page 35: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

SMART Goal (Specific, measurable. Attainable, results oriented, and timebound):

Team: High School English Department Date: Sept 28. 2006 Focus Area: D and F List SMART Goal: By the end of the term, the number of students currently earning a grade of D or F will decrease by 50% in the content area. Action Steps (What will be done?)

Designation (Who will do it?)

Timeframe (When will it be done?)

Results (The Evidence)

Gather and analyze fresh data, determine factors for failing grades Make contact with parents, students and AUT teacher Conduct progress monitoring with class and AUT teacher Direct students to additional intervention program with staff Continue Progress Monitoring and re-teaching efforts through tutoring program

Content Area Teaches Content teachers, counselors, AUT teachers Content teachers and AUT teacher Content teachers Content teachers

Oct 4 Oct 6 Every week As needed Every week

Grade distribution sheets, team agenda, team log Emails, mailings, program roster Contact/homework log Grade book Contact/homework log

Page 36: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

GoalProblem

Challenge

Reasons

Ideas

Possibilities

Actions

Solutions

Strategies

Needs

Commitments

Page 37: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Reduce the Number of D’s and F’s

Causes and InterventionStrategies

Page 38: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

CONTINUOUS WINNING (SUCCESS) YIELDS:

• CONFIDENCE• OPTIMISM: AN EXPECTATION OF

A POSITIVE RESULT• STRONG DESIRE TO SUCCEED• SELF ANALYSIS IN FAILURE• HIGH LEVEL OF EFFORT• RISK TAKING--STRETCHING

Page 39: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

CONTINUOUS FAILURE YIELDS:• PESSIMISM: EXPECTATION OF A

NEGATIVE RESULT• A SENSE OF FUTILITY,

HOPELESSNESS, FATALISM• WANING EFFORT• SELF CRITICISM IN FAILURE• DENIAL: COVER UP• FEAR OF RISK TAKING--

DEFENSIVENESS

Page 40: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Hope“Strong professional learning communities produce schools that are engines of hope and achievement for students.”

Jonathan SaphierOn Common Ground

Page 41: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Crucial Messages for becoming “Engines of Hope”

• What we are doing here is important

• You can do it!• I’m not going to give up on you –

even if you give up on yourself.

Jonathan SaphierOn Common Ground

Page 42: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams

Strategies for Changing Beliefs: Accentuate the Positive!

• Say It• Model It• Organize For It• Protect It• Reward It

Page 43: Big Idea and Characteristic #2:  Collaborative Teams