bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

55
BIOEN2: Bioenergy Crop Production, Handling & Logistics Dennis Pennington – Michigan State University Extension

Upload: sharon-lezberg

Post on 22-Jan-2015

365 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

BIOEN2: Bioenergy Crop Production, Handling & Logistics

Dennis Pennington – Michigan State University Extension

Page 2: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Agenda

• Overview of BION2: Bioenergy Crop Production and Harvesting

• Research data from MI

• Handling and logistics

Page 3: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

BIOEN2: Bioenergy Crops

2.1 Analyzing the economics of bioenergy crop production• Cost-benefit analysis in farm decision-making• Bioenergy crop budgets• Analyzing potential markets• Federal and state incentive programs for

production of biomass

Page 4: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

BIOEN2: Bioenergy Crops

2.2 Bioenergy Crop Production: a crop by crop analysis• Crop production– 19 fact sheets– Crop Comparison Matrix

• Energy Potential Box

Page 5: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

BIOEN2: Bioenergy Crops

2.3 Bioenergy Crop Production Sustainability Factors• Landscape diversity• Carbon Offset Markets• Life Cycle Analysis• Sustainable Management

Page 6: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Crop by Crop Analysis

Michigan Data

Switchgrass Agronomy Trial

MiscanthusEstablishment Trial

SwitchgrassVariety Trial Biofuel Productivity Trial

Page 7: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Biofuel Productivity Plot Locations

• 2009 (6)– Antrim, Barry, Cass,

Isabella, Kalamazoo, Saginaw

• 2010 (5)– Alger, Ottawa, Presque

Isle, Clinton, St. Joseph

• 2011 (7)– Wayne, Kent, Muskegon,

Osceola, Otsego, Branch, Lapeer

Page 8: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Funding Partners

Page 9: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Crops

Perennial• Switchgrass• Miscanthus• Indiangrass• Big Bluestem• Little Bluestem• Prairie Cordgrass• Reed Canarygrass

Annual• Forage sorghum• Sweet sorghum• Energy sorghum

– Photoperiod sensitive– Non-PS

• Corn• Canola• Oriental mustard• Sunflower• Soybean• Pennycress

Page 10: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Wildlife damage

Page 11: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Frost damage on switchgrass

Page 12: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Lodging

Sweet sorghum – Clinton CountyAugust 6, 2010

Page 13: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Lodging

Cass CountyNovember 9, 2010

Big Bluestem Indiangrass

Page 14: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Weed Control

Sunflowers (and ragweed!) – Clinton Co.June 1, 2010

Page 15: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Cass County (Edward Lowe Foundation)

2010 2011

Yield1 Ethanol2 Yield1 Ethanol2

Switchgrass 3.57 303.5 7.28 618.8 a

Indiangrass 5.02 426.7 6.97 592.5 ab

Miscanthus 3.77 320.5 6.56 557.6 ab

Big Bluestem 3.07 261.0 3.43 291.6 b

1 tons of dry matter/acre2 tons/acre X 85 gal/ton = gal of ethanol/acre3 Ethanol yield calculated at 2.8 gallons per bushel for corn grain.

Page 16: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Kellogg Biological Station2009 2010 2011

Yield1 Ethanol2 Yield1 Ethanol2 Yield1 Ethanol2

Canola (lbs/a) - - 121.6 - 467.4 -Oriental mustard (lbs/a) - - - - 179.3 -Sweet Sorghum 13.37 1136.5 7.66 651.1 7.32 622.2Energy sorghum (PS) - - 8.53 725.1 7.64 649.4Energy sorghum (non-PS) - - 10.9 924.0 7.55 641.8Switchgrass - - 4.42 375.7 5.31 451.4Miscanthus - - 4.4 373.2 7.80 663.0Indiangrass - - 3.5 300.9 4.60 391.0Big bluestem - - 2.6 221.9 2.51 213.4Little bluestem - - - - 1.48 125.8Reed Canarygrass - - 1.9 163.2 2.53 215.1Forage sorghum 6.63 563.6 4.9 418.2 4.16 353.6Corn grain 108.3 303.24 - - - -Corn stover 3.13 266.1 - - - -

1 tons of dry matter/acre2 tons/acre X 85 gal/ton = gal of ethanol/acre3 Ethanol yield cacluated at 2.8 gallons per bushel for corn grain.

Page 17: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

12-13 foot tallProduced seed head10.87 tons DM per acreKBS

14-15 foot tallNo seed head8.53 tons DM per acreKBS

Energy SorghumHigh Biomass Sorghum Photoperiod Sensitive Sorghum

Page 18: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Ottawa County (GVSU)

2010 2011 Yield1 Ethanol2 Yield1 Ethanol2

Switchgrass 1.9 161.5 6.48 550.8

Miscanthus 2.88 244.8 8.96 761.6

Sweet Sorghum 6.7 572.1 - -

Corn grain 68.0 190.4 - -

Corn stover 3.6 303.5 - -

1 tons of dry matter/acre2 tons/acre X 85 gal/ton = gal of ethanol/acre3 Ethanol yield cacluated at 2.8 gallons per bushel for corn grain.

Page 19: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Ottawa County (GVSU)

Page 20: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Miscanthus Establishment

• Purpose: compare transplants started in greenhouse to planting bare rhizomes in non-irrigated soil

• Treatments:– m-root = bare root planted directly in soil– m-trans = live plant grown for 8 weeks in

greenhouse

In partnership with and funded by the Energy Biosciences Institute at the University of Illinois.

Page 21: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Miscanthus transplants

Page 22: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

2009 2010 20110

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

m-rootm-trans

Perc

ent M

orta

lity

Miscanthus Establishment

Page 23: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Miscanthus Establishment

2009 20100

10

20

30

40

50

60

18.6

35.637.1

49.1

m-rootm-trans

Tille

rs p

er P

lant

Page 24: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Miscanthus Establishment

2009 2010 2011 Total0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

1.53

3.98

8.33

13.84

3.72

6.52

10.19

20.43

m-rootm-trans

Yiel

d (D

ry M

atter

Ton

s pe

r Acr

e)

Page 25: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Switchgrass Variety Trial (KBS)

Yield (tons DM/acre) Ecotype Year 1 Year 2 Year 3Alamo L a 3.59 3.87Blackwell U a 4.51 4.67Cave-in-Rock U a 4.22 4.48Dakota U a 1.71 1.81EG 1101 L 1.44 2.42 -EG 1102 L 2.18 4.08 -EG 2101 U 0.94 2.41 -Kanlow L a 2.62 4.40NE28 L a 2.53 2.47Shelter U 0.90 2.12 -Southlow U a 2.44 3.46Trailblazer U a 2.25 2.30

a In varieties established in 2009, yield data was not collected due to the fact that mowing was needed for weed control.L=lowland ecotype (typically out produces upland, grown in southern states)U=upland ecotype (better overwinter survival in northern states like Michigan)

Page 26: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Handling & Logistics

Photo by J.E Doll, MSU

Page 27: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Biomass Feedstock Sources

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Total

Agricultural

Forest

Million Dry Tons Per Year

• Logging residues• Excess timber (fuel treatments)• Fuel wood• Processing residues• Pulping liquors

Forest

• Crop residues• Grains• Perennial Grasses• Woody crops• Food processing waste• Municipal solid waste

Agricultural

Source: Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply, U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Department of Agriculture, April 2005.

Amount needed to reach U.S. bioenergy goals

Page 28: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

DensityPhysical1000 lbs/(36” x 48” x 96”) = 10.42 lb/ft3

Physical56 lbs/1.24 ft3 = 45.16 lb/ft3

Energy

Energy

125,000 acres

115,000 acres

Page 29: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Biomass Field DayVonore, TNOctober 2011

Page 30: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Two Material Handling Systems: Bales

Page 31: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 32: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 33: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 34: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 35: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 36: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 37: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 38: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 39: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 40: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 41: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Two Material Handling Systems: Bulk

Page 42: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 43: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 44: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 45: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 46: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 47: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 48: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 49: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 50: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

So which system is better?

Bales• More dense• Easier for farmer to handle• Cheaper at the farm end

Bulk• Less dense - requires

packing equip for transportation

• Saves de-twine, de-bale and chop operations at biorefinery

• Cheaper at biorefinery

Page 51: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Other issues

• Year round supply – can’t deliver all at harvest• Storage on farm– Covered bales– Bunker silo

• Equipment cost – baler is much cheaper

Page 52: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington
Page 53: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Cellulosic Ethanol

• How close is it?• 3-5 years?• Poet Ethanol– Reduced energy use, enzyme costs, raw material

requirements and capital expenses (Dec. 09)$4.13

$2. 35Photo by Dr. Cole Gustafson, NDSU

Page 54: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

Cellulosic Ethanol

• How close is it?• 3-5 years?• Genera Energy• $1.65 cash costs + $0.30 capital costs

$2. 00

Page 55: Bioenergy crop productionhandling pennington

http://fyi.uwex.edu/biotrainingcenter/

Questions?