bioenergy in pennsylvania: online database, map, and report mary s. booth partnership for policy...
TRANSCRIPT
Bioenergy in Pennsylvania: Online database, map, and report
Mary S. BoothPartnership for Policy Integrity
October 16, 2014
2
Background
• Partnership for Policy Integrity: bioenergy and forests focus– Climate change, air quality, fuels impacts
Reports (all at www.pfpi.net):
• “Trees, Trash, and Toxics: How Bioenergy Has Become the New Coal”
• “Climate of Deception”: Report to Federal Trade Commission on deceptive advertising/greenwashing by bioenergy industry
• Report to Securities and Exchange Commission on Climate and Investment Risks of Bioenergy
• Report to DOE on Taylor Biomass (NY) loan guarantee application
• 2012 report, “Bioenergy in Pennsylvania”
3
Why the concern with biomass boilers?Example of school boiler at East Lycoming SD, permitted at 0.22
lb/MMBtu
4
Goals of this presentation
• Describe Pennsylvania bioenergy database, report (formal release date is Tues Oct. 21)
• Facilitate its use• Get input on how to improve this project, and the next project
(map, database of most polluting facilities in Pennsylvania; emphasis on permit accountability)
5
What we did
• Pennsylvania Bulletin (www.pabulletin.com): Data for wood/biomass-fired boilers on boiler capacity, pollution emissions, emission controls, permit number, and permit renewal date
• Permits are renewed every five years – goal is to increase review during renewal
• Map and database at http://www.pfpi.net/biopower-in-pennsylvania– Leave username blank; password is …
6
The context for promotion of bioenergy as “clean”: Attainment status with EPA standards for PM2.5
Grey: whole county or partial county non-attainment with 24-hr PM2.5 std of 35 µg/m2
Black outline: whole county or partial county non-attainment with annual std of 12 µg/m2
8
Prevalence of asthma in schoolchildren – percent increase 2008/09 to 2012/13 school years
Statewide, asthma rates 6.82% in 2008/09 school year; by 2012/13, rate was 12.18%
9
Summary stats for biomass burners: our database
• In the Pennsylvania Bulletin: 101 bioenergy facilities with wood/biomass burning units (one gas-fired pellet mill)
• More than 70% are industrial burners or rotary pellet dryers • 7 large power generating (or industrial/power) facilities • 17 are “institutional” boilers; 12 are at schools• Many more burners that don’t get permits?
– State permitting thresholds:
10
Most burners are relatively small (~10 – 30 MMBtu/hr)
Combined capacity of biomass-burning units (at facilities for which Pennsylvania Bulletin reports capacity)
11
Pollution controls
• No NOx controls at smaller burners• PM controls minimal – cyclones,
multicyclones; almost no ESP’s or baghouses
12
Particulate matter: potential to emit at varying emissions rates
EPA’s boiler rule threshold: 10+ MMBtu/hr – sets standards for new burners only. Pennsylvania boiler population: boilers <10 MMBtu/hr or permitted prior to boiler rule standard
Potential to emit, per MMBtu of boiler capacity: • 0.22 lb/MMBtu x 1 MMBtu/hr x 8,760 hr/yr = 1,927.2 lb/yr (typical
Pennsylvania permitting rate)
• 0.07 lb/MMBtu: 613 lb/yr (EPA std for new boilers 10 – 30 MMBtu/hr)
• 0.03 lb/MMBtu: 263 lb/yr (EPA std for new boilers 30+ MMBtu/hr)
13
Modeling particle pollution costs
• Impact of each additional ton of air pollution increased by background air pollution
• EPA modeling: cost of ten tons of PM2.5 is $200,000+. • Air Pollution Emission Experiments and Policy Analysis Model
(APEEP): weights impacts by background air pollution
14
APEEP estimates: marginal cost of one ton PM2.5
for all counties of the US
Pennsylvania counties (red): some of the highest costs in the country
15
Cost impacts of bioenergy pollution – an example
Esbenshades Greenhouses, Lancaster County• County in non-attainment for ozone and PM2.5
• Asthma prevalence has doubled• Pennsylvania gave facility $474,502 • Facility uses multi-clone; actual emissions 38 tons PM/yr• APEEP estimate for ten tons pollution: $930,000
17
Summary stats for grants and loans
• Pennsylvania allocated over $30 m for bioenergy; Evergreen Comm. Energy got $39 million as federal grant
• 19 out of the total 38 companies that received support either no longer exist or have not yet received an operating permit for biomass boiler