biotech products in food supply
DESCRIPTION
Are They Safe? Biotech Food Crops and Products February 1, 2002 Karen Pesaresi Penner Kansas State University Food Science Institute. Biotech Products in Food Supply. 1. Fermentation products Yeasts and molds used to make cheese, bread, wine, beer, soy sauce 2. Enzymes - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Are They Safe? Biotech Food Crops and Products
February 1, 2002
Karen Pesaresi PennerKansas State UniversityFood Science Institute
Biotech Products in Food Supply
1. Fermentation products– Yeasts and molds used to make cheese,
bread, wine, beer, soy sauce2. Enzymes
– Lactase tablets to breakdown lactose in milk - for allergies
– Chymosin (rennet) for cheese manufacture– Amylase in beer
3. Hormones
Bovine growth hormone (rbst)
Vitamin D addedto milk Insulin
4. Whole foods/crops
– FLAVR SAVR, Endless Summer tomatoes
– Virus – resistant squash
– Insect resistant potatoes, corn
– Herbicide resistant soybeans, canola
Potential Benefits IFT Expert Report on Biotechnology and Foods, 2000
• Enhanced food supply• Improved nutritional quality – rice, other
foods• Improved shelf life of fruits & vegetables• Reduced allergenicity – rice, peanuts
• Improved production agriculture• Conversion of toxic soils to
productive soils• Increased environmentally friendly
practices regarding pesticides• Development of functional foods,
vaccines, other healthful products
Public Uncertainty
• Public is NOT well-informed
• Public may see little or no benefit from technologies
• Lack of information and conflicting information
leads to confusion, emotional reactions and fear for some
Acceptance of Technologies
• Public accepts new technologies with personal benefits
rInsulin vs rBST
Benefits of many bioengineered
products unknown or not perceived as personal
FDA and Food Safety
• U.S.Food and Drug Law – requires food products to be safe
• Traditional foods – considered safe, long history• Exceptions
– some “safe” foods affect specific individuals– “safe” foods may contain small amount of natural
toxins• New foods – developed with conventional
breeding, or from other parts of the world considered safe
rDNA Derived Foods and Ingredients
• Assessed for safety before introduction into marketplace
• 1992 FDA Risk Assessment – focus on unique characteristics of product
• Safety standards for bioengineered products actually greater than for conventional
Potential Food Safety Effects
• Toxicants• New Substances• Nutrients• Allergenicity• Other Effects - Unintended
-- IFT Expert Report on Biotechnology and Foods, 2000
Considerations in Safety Evaluations
• Substantial Equivalence – based on comparison of recombinant product with traditional product– Not an absolute guarantee of safety– Process to establish that no NEW hazards have
been introduced into the plant or product• Toxins?• Nutrient Effects? Proteins, fats, carbohydrates,
vitamins, minerals• Allergens?
Substantial Equivalence:
“ A comparative approach focusing on the determination of similarities and differences between the genetically modified food and its conventional counterpart aids in the identification of potential safety and nutritional issues and is considered the most appropriate strategy for the safety and nutritional assessment of genetically modified foods.” (FAO/WHO 2000)
Assessment beyond equivalence:
• Completely new food substance • Changes in concentrations of major
human dietary nutrients• Increased concentrations of
“antinutritional factors”• Increased concentrations of toxins
Safety of Genetic Material Inserted
Characterization of• Source• Size• Number• Location of insertion• Identification of sequences in the plantSafety of DNA itself is not in question
Unintended Effects:
“… the unintended expression of some unknown or unexpected toxic or antinutrient factor, or the otherwise unintended enhanced production of known toxic constituents.” - (Royal Society, 1998)
Evidence of such effects has not been found as result of bioengineering.
Effects are less likely in bioengineered than in conventional products.
Food Allergens:
• All food allergens are proteins: only a small fraction of food proteins cause allergic response.
• Common foods with allergenic proteins: peanuts, milk, seafoods
• Potential allergenicity of genetic material (proteins) introduced into a plant is an important part of safety assessment.
Allergenicity Assessment
• Follows a decision-tree process• Includes:
– Source of the gene– Sequence homology of newly introduced
protein– Reactivity of newly introduced proteins with
Immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies from people with known allergies to source material
– Other properties, such as digestibility of the protein
Safety Assessments
Refined and adapted and will continue to change and develop.
Safety assessments are an important part of the development process.
“FDA’s scientific review continues to show that all bioengineered foods sold here in the U.S. today are as safe as their non-bioengineered counterparts”
Dr. Jane Henney, M.D.
U.S. Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 2000
Questions?