biotechnology for exam 3

26
BIOTECHNOLOGY: APPLICATIONS OF MICROBIAL GENETICS Biotechnology: The use of microorganisms, cells, or cell components to make a product Foods, antibiotics, vitamins, enzymes Recombinant DNA technology: Insertion or modification of genes to produce desired proteins. Monday, February 27, 2012

Upload: marilen-parungao

Post on 31-Oct-2014

1.074 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Biotechnology for exam 3

BIOTECHNOLOGY: APPLICATIONS OF

MICROBIAL GENETICS

• Biotechnology: The use of microorganisms, cells, or cell components to make a product

• Foods, antibiotics, vitamins, enzymes

• Recombinant DNA technology: Insertion or modification of genes to produce desired proteins.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 2: Biotechnology for exam 3

BIOTECHNOLOGY: APPLICATIONS OF

MICROBIAL GENETICS

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 3: Biotechnology for exam 3

BIOTECHNOLOGY: APPLICATIONS OF

MICROBIAL GENETICS

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 4: Biotechnology for exam 3

BENEFITS FROM BIOTECHNOLOGY

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 5: Biotechnology for exam 3

BENEFITS FROM BIOTECHNOLOGY

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 6: Biotechnology for exam 3

BENEFITS FROM BIOTECHNOLOGY

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 7: Biotechnology for exam 3

BIOTECHNOLOGY & DUAL RESEARCH

IMPACTS ON BIOTERRORISM

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 8: Biotechnology for exam 3

Biological Research has led to the development of new drugs, treatments, and medical

advancements that have profoundly impacted our health and way of life

The General Public holds scientists and their work in high regard and trusts that they will act in the best interest of society

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 9: Biotechnology for exam 3

What is Dual-Use Research?

“Legitimate scientific work that could be misused to threaten public health or national security”

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 10: Biotechnology for exam 3

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 11: Biotechnology for exam 3

THUS: any medical advance that improves the ease of engineering,

handling, or delivering treatment has the potential to be applied by those wishing to do harm and can be considered "dual-

use

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 12: Biotechnology for exam 3

“advances in biotechnology … have the potential to create a much more dangerous biological warfare threat … engineered biological agents could be worse than any disease

known to man.” (CIA, 2003)

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 13: Biotechnology for exam 3

“advances in biotechnology … have the potential to create a much more dangerous biological warfare threat … engineered biological agents could be worse than any disease

known to man.” (CIA, 2003)

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 14: Biotechnology for exam 3

Case Studies

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 15: Biotechnology for exam 3

❖ Dr. Wimmer, Distinguished Professor in the Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology at the State University of New York (SUNY) at Stony Brook

❖ 1991: Published the chemical formula of the polio virus

❖ 2001:biochemically synthesized (deliberately) poliovirus according to its genomic sequence in the absence of a template without a DNA or RNA template, or the help of living cells

❖ 2002 published in Science

❖ DUAL USE Implications: unnecessarily demonstrating how bioterrorists could use modern scientific techniques to create dangerous pathogens

❖ POLICY: “prior to attempting synthesis of a microbial chromosome we commissioned an independent bioethical review of our proposed scientific plan.”

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 16: Biotechnology for exam 3

❖ Dr. Wimmer, Distinguished Professor in the Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology at the State University of New York (SUNY) at Stony Brook

❖ 1991: Published the chemical formula of the polio virus

❖ 2001:biochemically synthesized (deliberately) poliovirus according to its genomic sequence in the absence of a template without a DNA or RNA template, or the help of living cells

❖ 2002 published in Science

❖ DUAL USE Implications: unnecessarily demonstrating how bioterrorists could use modern scientific techniques to create dangerous pathogens

❖ POLICY: “prior to attempting synthesis of a microbial chromosome we commissioned an independent bioethical review of our proposed scientific plan.”

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 17: Biotechnology for exam 3

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 18: Biotechnology for exam 3

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 19: Biotechnology for exam 3

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 20: Biotechnology for exam 3

❖ Dr. Stuart Levy of the Tufts University School of Medicine (Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2006) identified a gene in Yersinia pestis similar to an Escherichia coli gene known to cause multiple antibiotic resistance

❖ Yesinia pestis causes plague, famously known as the “Black Death” after it caused an estimated 50 million deaths throughout Europe, Africa, and Asia in the 1300’s.

❖ confers resistance to a variety of drugs, oxidative stress agents, and organic solvents

❖ transcriptional regulators of a multidrug efflux pump

❖ MarR protein represses transcription of the efflux pump, whereas the MarA protein increases its expression, thereby activating antibiotic resistance.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 21: Biotechnology for exam 3

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 22: Biotechnology for exam 3

❖ In his 1945 Nobel Prize lecture, Fleming ended with a cautionary remark saying; “but I would like to sound one note of warning… it is not difficult to make microbes resistant to penicillin in the laboratory by exposing them to concentrations not sufficient to kill them, and the same thing has occasionally happened in the body.”

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 23: Biotechnology for exam 3

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 24: Biotechnology for exam 3

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 25: Biotechnology for exam 3

❖ PROS: experiments could uncover the reasons why the Spanish flu pandemic was so deadly and could offer insight into avian flu pathology and how it might become transmissible in humans.

❖ CONS:

❖ publication of the viral sequence, conditions under which the virus was handled and the threat of its escape into the environment;

❖ recreate deadly and transmissible though extinct or eradicated viruses;

❖ can be used for the design of a weapon of mass destruction; there is a risk verging on inevitability of accidental… or deliberate release of the virus.

❖ IMPACT TO PUBLIC HEALTH: advancement in tools to sequence genomes and synthesize DNA; BUT could be used to engineer biological weapons

Monday, February 27, 2012

Page 26: Biotechnology for exam 3

We must PREVENT such MISUSE without IMPEDING research

PROGRESS!

“are there potential benefits to public health and safety from application or utilization of this information?”

Monday, February 27, 2012