birth-to-five · • the capital quality rating for the birth-to-five framework is determined using...

74
Capital Quality Framework Webinar Birth-to-Five Aug. 27, 2019

Upload: others

Post on 22-Aug-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Capital Quality Framework Webinar

Birth-to-Five

Aug. 27, 2019

Page 2: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Agenda

2

• Revised Timeline for 2018-2019 Capital Quality Rating and Designation Process

• Capital Quality Rating and Designation

• Next Steps

Page 3: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Revised Timeline for 2018-2019 Capital Quality Rating and Designation Process

Page 4: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

4

OSSE will complete the 2018-2019 Capital Quality rating and designation process for all child development facilities participating in Capital Quality (i.e., Pilot, Group Two, Group Three and Group Four) according to the revised timeline shown in Table 1. For reference, the previous timeline is also shown in Table 1 marked with strikethrough.

Table 1. Revised Timeline

Revised Timeline

ActionPilot and Group

TwoGroup Three Group Four

Capital Quality designation determined

Spring/Summer 2019Fall 2019

Tiered reimbursement changes onlyif facility designation is higher

Spring/Summer 2019Fall 2019

Hold harmless policy ends; tiered reimbursement aligns to facility designation whether higher or lower

Fall2020

Fall2021

Fall2022

Page 5: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Capital Quality Rating and Designation

Page 6: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

6

Capital Quality Rating and Designation Definitions

Framework • The Capital Quality category based on the type of setting (home or center) and the age groups of children

served (birth-to-five). The framework is then used in combination with the metric and informs the way in which the rating is calculated to determine a Capital Quality designation.

Metric• Instruments or indicators used to assess performance in each area defined, commonly known as measures.

Floor• The minimum value for which any points are awarded (for all metrics), indicating the minimum level of

performance acceptable for a program to receive points in the Capital Quality rating system.

Target• The value at which the maximum points for a metric are awarded, indicating the desired level of performance

in achieving the stated outcome in the Capital Quality rating system.

Rating• Refers to the numeric score earned each year upon calculating the facility’s scores from each of their metrics

according to the formula for their framework.

Designation• A facility’s level of quality based on points earned – Developing, Progressing, Quality or High-Quality.

• Note: Facilities can also be designated Preliminary when they are still in the process of being rated to determine their Capital Quality designation of Developing, Progressing, Quality or High-Quality.

Page 7: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Program Distribution by Framework

7

N = 237Program Year: 2018-2019

Page 8: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

8

Capital Quality Frameworks and Metrics

Page 9: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

9

Capital Quality Rating Metrics

Environment Rating Scales (ERS):• Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale-Revised (ITERS-R)• Family Child Care Environment Rating Scale-Revised (FCCERS-R)

Classroom Assessment Scoring System for Pre-K (CLASS™ Pre-K)

Floors and targets are research-based.

Page 10: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

10

• ITERS-R/FCCERS-R items measure the extent to which the early care and education environments promote children’s health and safety and stimulate children through language and activities and warm, supportive interactions with providers

• The ITERS-R and FCCERS-R metrics utilize six subscales, which are then used in the calculation of the total score used in the rating:o Space and Furnishings o Personal Care Routineso Listening and Talkingo Activitieso Interactiono Program Structure

Note: The Parents and Staff subscale scores are not included in overall scores

• Each item is scored on a scale of 1 to 7o With higher scores indicating higher quality

ERS Overview

Page 11: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

What do the ERS floors and targets represent?

How do they differ? What does the Floor Score represent?

Score: 3

What does the Target Score represent?

Score: 6

FCCERS-R • Designed for use in family child care settings

Indicates minimal quality

• Books are in good repair

• Occasional smiling, talking, affection with children

• Schedule meets the needs of most of the children

• Attention is on caregiving

• Moderate amount of talking

Indicates good to excellent quality

• Books are set-up for independent and shared use

• Frequent interaction that is responsive to child’s mood and needs

• Schedule is modified to meet children’s needs

• Supervision is individualized

• Wide range of vocabularyused/verbal play with children

ITERS-R • Designed for use in infant and toddler classrooms

FCCERS-R and ITERS-R capture indicators of children’s safety, health, stimulation in activities and interactions with the provider

11

Page 12: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

12

• CLASS™ Pre-K measures the quality of teacher-child interactions in preschool classroom settings

• The CLASS metric is comprised of three domains, each with its own floor and target:

• Emotional Support • Classroom Organization• Instructional Support

• Each domain is comprised of dimensions that are scored on a scale of 1 to 7o Higher scores for each domain indicate higher quality

CLASS Overview

Page 13: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

What do CLASS™ Pre-K floors and targets represent?

CLASS™ Pre-K Domain

What does it measure?

What does the Floor Score represent?

What does the TargetScore represent?

Emotional Support

Measures teachers’ efforts to support children’s social and emotional functioning (e.g., teacher sensitivity,emotional connection)

Score: 4.5Some evidence that the teachers and children share warm, supportive relationships, yet teachers are only sometimes aware of children who need support or attention

Score: 6.0Evidence of frequent positivecommunication between teachers and children; teachers consistently are flexible, go along with child’s ideas and organize instruction around child interests

Classroom Organization

Measures classroom-level organization (e.g., behavior management, routines)

Score: 4.5Some evidence that rules/expectations may be stated clearly, but are inconsistently enforced by the teachers

Score: 6.0Consistent evidence that teachers are proactive, monitor the classroom effectively to prevent problems from developing; they focus on positives and making use of subtle cues

InstructionalSupport

Measures the ways in which teachers effectively support cognitive and languagedevelopment in their classrooms (e.g., languagemodeling, asking open-ended questions)

Score: 2.0Evidence that teachers rarely provide scaffolding and ignore problems in understanding; feedback to children is often perfunctory (yes/no that’s right/wrong)

Score: 4.0Evidence of occasional use of discussions that promote analysis and reasoning; sometimes feedback loops promote exchanges, other times not

13

Page 14: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

14

• 70 percent of the rating is calculated using metric scores from the current year• 30 percent of the rating is calculated using metric scores from the previous year

Capital Quality Rating

30%

70%

Capital Quality Rating

Previous Year's Score

Current Year's Score

Page 15: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

DevelopingBelow the floor on all subscales

Progressing0.01 - 33.33 points across all subscales

Quality33.34 - 66.66 points across all subscales

High-Quality66.67 - 100 points across all subscales

Capital Quality Designation

Determining Designations

15

Page 16: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

16

• The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative to the targets and floors. The total number of possible points is based on the number of pre-K and infant/toddler classrooms served.

– If a facility has more pre-K classrooms than infant/toddler classrooms, then its Capital Quality rating will be weighted more heavily by CLASS.

– If a facility has more infant/toddler classrooms than pre-K classrooms, then its Capital Quality rating will be weighted more heavily by ITERS-R.

• Using four example facilities with stable or changing classroom compositions, the following slides demonstrate how CLASS and ITERS-R scores translate into Capital Quality designations.

Capital Quality RatingBirth-to-Five Framework

Page 17: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Example ABirth-to-Five Facilities with Stable Classroom Composition: Two Types of Classroom Observations in Each Year During a Two-Year Rating Period

Page 18: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

18

Example A

Page 19: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

19

Example A

Page 20: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

20

Example A

Page 21: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

21

Example A

Page 22: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

22

Example A

Page 23: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

23

Example A

Page 24: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

24

Example A

Page 25: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

25

Example A

Page 26: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

26

Example A

Page 27: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

27

Example A

Page 28: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

28

Example A

Page 29: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

29

Example A

Page 30: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Example BBirth-to-Five Facilities with Changing Classroom Composition: Two Types of Classroom Observations in Each Year During a Two-Year Rating Period

Page 31: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

31

Example B

Page 32: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

32

Example B

Page 33: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

33

Example B

Page 34: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

34

Example B

Page 35: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

35

Example B

Page 36: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

36

Example B

Page 37: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

37

Example B

Page 38: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

38

Example B

Page 39: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

39

Example B

Page 40: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

40

Example B

Page 41: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

41

Example B

Page 42: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

42

Example B

Page 43: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Example CBirth-to-Five Facilities with Changing Classroom Composition: Only One Type of Classroom Observation in One Year During a Two-Year Rating Period

Page 44: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

44

Example C

Page 45: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

45

Example C

Page 46: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

46

Example C

Page 47: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

47

Example C

Page 48: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

48

Example C

Page 49: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

49

Example C

Page 50: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

50

Example C

Page 51: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

51

Example C

Page 52: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

52

Example C

Page 53: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

53

Example C

Page 54: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

54

Example C

Page 55: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

55

Example C

Page 56: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Example DBirth-to-Five Facilities with Stable Classroom Composition: Two Types of Classroom Observations in Each Year During a Two-Year Rating Period

Page 57: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

57

Example D

Page 58: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

58

Example D

Page 59: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

59

Example D

Page 60: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

60

Example D

Page 61: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

61

Example D

Page 62: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

62

Example D

Page 63: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

63

Example D

Page 64: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

64

Example D

Page 65: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

65

Example D

Page 66: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

66

Example D

Page 67: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

67

Example D

Page 68: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

68

Example D

Page 69: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Next Steps

Page 70: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

70

• Capital Quality framework-specific rating calculation webinars will be posted on https://osse.dc.gov/page/capital-quality-qris once recorded.

Validation• Sept. 16-Sept. 30, 2019

– Providers have an opportunity to validate 2018-2019 Capital Quality ratings, designations and other information that may be shared on the Capital Quality profile.

• 5 p.m. on Sept. 30, 2019– Submissions of concerns about accuracy of information or the calculation of the

Capital Quality rating are due.• Oct. 15, 2019

– OSSE will respond no later than this date to all concerns raised.

Notes• It is critical that providers adhere to the Sept. 30 deadline to submit concerns; OSSE

will not respond to concerns raised after Sept. 30, 2019.• Validation is a passive process, so no submissions of concerns are required.

Next Steps

Page 71: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

71

• Ensure your contact information is accurate on file with OSSE.

– If you need to update your contact information, contact your respective licensing specialist.

• Sign up for technical assistance during the validation time period.

– Review the validation guide (available in September 2019).

– Quality facilitators and education service monitors (ESMs) can support assigned facilities during the validation time period.

– Attend webinars on the validation process and Quick Base app during the week of Sept. 9-13, 2019.

– Attend office hours (schedule forthcoming).

Next Steps: Available Technical Assistance

Page 72: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Q&A

Page 73: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

FIND US

facebook.com/ossedc

twitter.com/ossedc

youtube.com/DCEducation

www.osse.dc.gov

GET SOCIAL

ADDRESS:

POC:

73

OSSE Contacts

1050 First St. NE, Sixth Floor

Washington, DC 20002

Michele Reid, Program Manager

[email protected]

Page 74: Birth-to-Five · • The Capital Quality rating for the Birth-to-Five framework is determined using the CLASS and ITERS-R metrics for the current year and previous year, relative

Thank you!