bjt lab
TRANSCRIPT
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 1/16
~ 1 ~
High Frequency Behavior
of BJTsUniversity of Minnesota - EE 3101
[Type the author name]
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 2/16
~ 2 ~
Abstract
The experiments goal is to learn how to measure the components of the hybrid- small-signal model of
the BJT and to investigate the high frequency response of some amplifier circuits using it. In this
experiment the values of the models components will be determined experimentally and then by
manipulating the amplifier circuit we can derive a series of equations to find the values of the small
signal components. The values were found to be reasonable when compared to the manufacturers data
sheets.
Introduction
The hybrid- model of a BJT is a small signal model, named after the -like equivalent circuit for a
bipolarjunction transistor. The model is shown in Figure 1. It consists of an input impedance, r , an
outputimpedance r0, and a voltage controlled current source described by the transconductance, gm.
The transconductance, gm, of a bipolar transistor is defined as the change in the collector current
divided bychange of the base-emitter voltage.
The base input resistance, r is defined by
The output resistance, ro, is defined as
However, In this experiment the model that is being used was slightly different because is being
ignored which normally is placed in parallel with will also be ignored, as the resistance will be
shunted by a much smaller resistance. The hybrid- model that will be used in this experiment is shown
below in Figure 2.With the aid of an amplifier circuit measurements will be taken to determine the
values of
Figure 1
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 3/16
~ 3 ~
The digital multimeters are used in this experiment are PIX which measure voltage in rms
values.
Hybrid- Model
Using the amplifier ciruict shown in Figure 3 the input resistance of the transistor at low frequency was
measured to be 16.6k.
Using the component values shown the collector current is 0.994mA. However, the circuit that was used
in the experiement was slightly different.
was assumed to be 200 and since >>1 it can be proven that IC is equal to IE because is equal to 1.
Then using Kirchoffs voltage loop the following equation is obtained.
Vo is used as 7.5V in order to get a greater swing as requested in the experiment.
R1
100
R2
1M
R3
1k
R4
14.3k
C1
10u
C2
10u
0
V1
-15
Q2
Q2N3393
V20.1Vac
0Vdc
Figure 2
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 4/16
~ 4 ~
Although RL was calculated to be 7.5K, using PSpice this did not result in a 1mA collector current where
as RL equal to 100 did, which is a considerately noticeable difference.
The base current was then calculated to be roughly 5µA using the equation; .
Using Kirchoffs voltage loop again and assuming RB to be very large, 1M, the emitter resistance was
then calculated to be 9.3K which is a lot closer to the desired value shown in Figure 1. After using these
resistor values and taking a DC analysis of the circuit trying to reach a 1mA collector current the two
resistor values were changed to 5.5K and 5.1K accordingly. However, when simulated in PSpice this
gave a 0.134mA current at the collector.
With the DC analysis Vo was measured to be 9.1V, IRE to be 1.03mA and IRL to be 1.03mA.
Then using the following formula RIN was calcualted to be 16.6K.
V1 and V2 were obtained by using the DMM to measure the voltages as shown in Figure 3 below.
RIN was higher than expected but it did coincide with what others in the same lab section
had obtained also. This discrepancy can most likely be due to the difference in component
values compared to the PSpice model above, particularly the value of RL.
Rs
Rin
+
-
OUT
V1 V2
Figure 3
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 5/16
~ 5 ~
Frequency Response Part I
In the next three sections the task is to find the frequency of the BJTs single pole. To do this we will be
measuring the frequency response and finding the -3dB frequency. The current gain of the BJT behaves
according to the following equation;
Where f H is the frequency at which the current gain has fallen 3dB from its mid-band value.
Referring to the above equation it can be seen that there are a number of different variables. FH can be
found using the measurement of the -3dB point, gm can be calculated from the bias conditions and RL is
known. This leaves one equation with three unknowns. Therefore we must find another two equations
similar to this one with the same variables without introducing anymore. Later in the experiment, this
circuit is modified slightly to achieve this goal.
For now, the small signal collector current is needed. This can be measured by taking the difference in
voltage across RS which will allow us to calculate IIN. To calculate Io, the voltage across RL must be
measured then using Ohms law divided by the resistance.
The circuit that is being used for this experiment is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 6/16
~ 6 ~
Gm is calculated to be 0.0385A/V using the equation;
Then using bode plotter the -3dB frequency was obtained by observing the graph output as shown
below in Figure 4.
Figure 5
FH1 was found to be 1.3MHz, gm to be 0.0385A/V and RL to be 100. With these values our first equation
becomes;
Using PSpice to simulate the same circuit the output is similar to Figure 5 but still a little different as
shown in Figure 6.
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 7/16
~ 7 ~
Because the collector current measured in PSpice was not 1mA using the chosen component values the
circuit was simulated again with a 1mA current and the output was again slighly different as shown in
figure 7 below.
Each output gives a different -3dB frequency but I decided to use the frequency obtained in the lab itself
using the breadboard.
Figure 6
Figure 7
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 8/16
~ 8 ~
Adding a 1nF Capacitor
In order to get the next equation a 1nF capacitor was added across the existing Cµ which lies across VBC
junction. The revised circuit is shown below in Figure 8. The values of IC and VBE have not changed;
therefore gm remains the same also.
FH2 is now measured to be 13KHz and with CX equal to 1nF, RL still equal to 100 and gm unchanged the
second equation becomes;
FH again was found using bode plotter and by observing the data graphically the -3dB point was
determined and f H was calculated. Figure 9 below shows the bode plot that was from the experiment
where as Figure 10 shows the bode plot simulated from PSpice and then Figure 11 is the bode plot of
the circuit with the 1mA collector current obtained in PSpice.
Figure 8
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 9/16
~ 9 ~
Figure 11
Again simulating the circuit with the correct collector current gave a slightly different output as shown
below in Figure 11.
Figure 9
Figure 10
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 10/16
~ 10 ~
Figure 12
Increase RL
In this next part the final equation is found. This time we remove the capacitor that was just previously
added and instead increased the value of RL by a factor of 10 which corresponds to a value of 1K.
f H3 is found to be 0.6MHz which gives the third equation;
The circuit that was used to find this measurement Is shown below in Figure 12.
Again, the the frequency was obtained by observing the output and taking the -3dB. Below
are three bode plots, Figure 13, 14 and 15 respectively. Figure 13 is from the labexperiment using the breadboard. Figure 14 is using PSpice with the same components as
in lab and Figure 15 is using components that make a 1mA collector current in PSpice.
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 11/16
~ 11 ~
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 12/16
~ 12 ~
Calculation of Cµ, C and r
In summary, the three equations that were previously found are;
1.
2.
3.
Solving these equations simultaneously gives the results as follows.
r= 2.5K, C=0.41pF, Cµ=1.65pF
These three values do not seem to be very reasonably for the transistors that were used in the
experiment. Obviously noisy equipment can complicates the accurate measurements needed but even
so these are noticeably wrong.
The value of rX is also required, so by using the following circuit in Figure 16 it is possible to calculate rX.
The ir it bove shows the inp t si e of the sm ll sign l hybri mo el e is nown s it is is r ete r esistor n r w s l l ted pr evio sly. in w s lso pr evio sly l l ted so rx is simple to find j stsing the series ombin tion of r esistors.
Rx
Rp
Re
0
Rin
Figure 16
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 13/16
~ 13 ~
Cascode Amplifier
The circuits used up until now have been Common-Emitter amplifiers. In order to create an amplifier
with a larger bandwidth and higher gain we use a pair of transistors. This is known as a cascade amplifier
and is shown in Figure 17 below.
Figure 17
The design calls for a Vcc of 15V with a collector current of 1mA. In order to get the largest possible
output voltage swing Q1 needs to be biased around 7.5V. The three resistor values were chosen to be
200k and 100k. Then using Kirchhoffs voltage law Re was calculated to be 4.3K and RC to be 8K.
Then using Ohms law the collector current was calculated to be 0.99mA which resulted in a gain of
7.2dB which gave a f L=230Hz and f H=208KHz resulting in a bandwidth of 208KHz.
However, when simulated in PSpice using these calculated values the collector current was then
observed to be roughly 0.5mA so Re was adjusted accordingly until 1mA was obtained. Re reached 1.9K
before the desired current was reached.
Figure 18 below shows the bode plot from PSpice using the circuit from Figure 17. The bandwidth in that
circuit was a lot larger and approximately 5MHz.
0
R
¡
7.9k
R ¢
£ 00k
R
¤
00k
R
6
00k
R
7
.9k
C8
0u
C9
47¥
C
0
47¥
¦ ¤
¦ £
N¡ ¡
93
Q6
Q2N3393
V7
§
¤
V
V80.1Vac
0V ̈
c
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 14/16
~ 14 ~
Figure 18
Common-Collector/Common-Base Transistor Pair
This amplifier should be able to operate with a larger bandwidth but everything comes with a price and
this time it will cost some gain. The capacitors that are being used for coupling in this circuit are 10µF
and then a 47µF capacitor between the emitters. The goal is to achieve a 1mA collector current in Q2. To
find the gain and bandwidth a series of voltage measurements are taken at VO and VS verses frequency.
Figure 19, as shown below is the circuit that was constructed in both PSpice and on the breadboard.
Figure 19
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 15/16
~ 15 ~
VO was measured to be 7.2V.
The upper corner frequency is caused by the transistors high frequency limitations. The upper corner
frequency was found to be roughly 230 KHz which is a gain of 1.65. The lower corner frequency occurs
around 100Hz which is caused by the coupling capacitors shorting out from the very low frequency. The
-3dB point is 4.4dB which is a gain of 2.36 approximately.
Because a resistance was added to the source it altered the measurements so Vi and VO measurements
were taken again and the gain increased to 16.1.
The circuit that was used to make these measurements is shown below in Figure 20.
Comparison of Amplifier Topologies
This section is simply comparing the circuits of the previous sections to the cascade circuits. There were
a total of three circuits used in the experiment; a single-transistor current follower was the first one.
This proved to have acceptable gain and bandwidth. However, when using a pair of transistors the gain
and bandwidth improved. Then using the Cascode circuit in PSpice the gain decreased where as the
bandwidth increased.
C141n
0
R18
7 9
R19
200k
R 0
100k
R
1100k
R
1 9k
C11
10u
C13
47n
7
N3393
V9
-15V
V100.1Va
0V
8
N3393
Figure 20
8/8/2019 BJT Lab
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bjt-lab 16/16
~ 16 ~
Conclusion
The Hybrid- model, as complicated as it may seem is used for many various applications. With simply
altering the amplifier circuits slightly the gain and bandwidth can have a major effect from it. Working at
such frequencies in the lab made it very difficult to record accurate measurements because the
instruments were susceptible to noise, even directly from the function generator were difficult to
accurately record data using the oscilloscope. There is a good chance that this is one reason why the
data obtained during the experiment was a little different than anticipated. The fact that some of these
amplifier circuits produce large amounts of gain which require small input signals to avoid the output
being clipped. This made it very hard to observe the input when it was small.