bob cupit manager, energy facility permitting minnesota public utilities commission

14
Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Upload: vincent-cross

Post on 06-Jan-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

DESCRIPTION

Minnesota PUC’s Wind Siting Authority Small projects (5-50 megawatts) – Require only a site permit – Must be completed within 6 months - typically 3 to 4 months – 2007 legislation allows local review up to 25 MW Large projects (>50 megawatts) – Require both a certificate of need and a site permit: separate processes that are undertaken in parallel and, to some extent, jointly – Must be completed in 12 months – typically 7months – Largest to date – 200 MW We have denied no permit applications

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Bob CupitManager, Energy Facility PermittingMinnesota Public Utilities Commission

Page 2: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Insert Xcel photos

Page 3: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Minnesota PUC’s Wind Siting Authority

• Small projects (5-50 megawatts)

– Require only a site permit– Must be completed within 6 months - typically 3 to 4 months– 2007 legislation allows local review up to 25 MW

• Large projects (>50 megawatts) – Require both a certificate of need and a site permit: separate

processes that are undertaken in parallel and, to some extent, jointly

– Must be completed in 12 months – typically 7months– Largest to date – 200 MW

• We have denied no permit applications

Page 4: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

The Minnesota Siting Experience Has Been Positive, Enabled By:

A state policy emphasis on aggressive wind development

Since 1994, state mandates increasing wind capacity in utility portfolios

State incentives for wind development

Community Based Energy Development encouraging locally-owned wind projects that has improved public acceptance

A societal and economic environment that recognizes renewable benefits

Broad public support of wind as an alternative energy source            

Page 5: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Other Factors:

Economic benefits associated with rapid growth in ethanol production has enhanced willingness in rural areas to host other non-traditional economic opportunities.

Our best wind resources are in a rural, agricultural area that is seeing significant

economic benefits, both directly to landowners and local economies.

on the eastern edge of the mid-continent Great Plains, with relatively flat terrain and sparse settlement.

Initial development in an area with few conflicting resource development interests

Page 6: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Responding to Needs

Regulatory treatment that has responded to needs

With a 15 year history of wind project permitting, our siting standards and process have evolved, providing clearer guidance for permit applicants and smoother review procedures.

As development moves into areas with more diverse and dense land use, we are seeing more resistance from adjacent landowners, though there are clearly still strong policy drivers that support continued development throughout the state.

Evaluating whether certification of need continues to be appropriate for wind mandates

Evaluating further efficiencies in site review process

Page 7: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Needs Going Forward

Siting standards and procedures will need to continue to evolve.

Recent legislation addresses balance of local and state siting jurisdiction by allowing counties to regulate wind developments under 25 megawatts

Siting standards are being reviewed for use by both state and county permitting procedures.

State and federal agencies with land and resource management interests need to continue to develop review and policy standards.

Wind developers need to continue to improve appropriate best practices for working with communities.

The significant potential for continued wind energy development justifies an emphasis on anticipating and assessing environmental impacts.

Aggressive planning of efficient transmission capability is critical.

Integration of long term wind development and transmission development is needed to guide expansion.

 

Page 8: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

What About Transmission?

• Current Minnesota Initiatives– CapX2020 Projects– Mandated Renewable Energy Transmission Plan

• Interconnection Challenges– Midwest ISO Responses

Page 9: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

CapX 2020 Transmission ProjectsCapX 2020 is a current effort by the state's largest transmission

owners -- including cooperatives, municipals and investor-owned utilities -- to assess the system and projected growth in customer demand for electricity through 2020.

Studies show that Minnesota's transmission backbone will require major upgrades and expansion to accommodate increased electricity use expected in the state and region through 2020.

Project Group I Project Group I includes approximately 600 miles of 345-kilovolt lines, connecting Minnesota with North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin and a smaller 230-kilovolt line in the Bemidji area. These projects are estimated to cost approximately $1.3 billion. Permitting underway – in service 2011-2015

Project Group II – Around the Twin CitiesProject Group III – Remote Generation Outlet

Page 10: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Page 11: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Page 12: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Mandated Renewable Energy Transmission Plan

2007 RES requires additional 7000 MW by 2025

Transmission Plan to meet RES filed Nov. 1, 2007

Multiple additional studies required

Aggressive expansion anticipated

Must be fully integrated with Midwest ISO planning

Page 13: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

Interconnection Challenges

Midwest ISO interconnection study queue is backed up

22,000 Minnesota MW in study queue

32% result in interconnection agreement

Concerns by developers

Concerns by Midwest Governors

Midwest ISO working with stakeholders to fix

Page 14: Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission