bobs for good

16
www.brandseye.com t BobsForGood

Upload: brandseye

Post on 15-Jan-2015

430 views

Category:

Sports


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

tBobsForGood

Page 2: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

General Insights: The campaign received 868 online conversations

23.846 of the conversation from Twitter

89% of conversation was Consumer driven

99.885% of the conversation was positive

4.72% of the websites linked back to

Bobsforgood.co.za

Brand momentum: 108 daily mentions per day

Campaign Value: R270 973.83 (AVE)

Page 3: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

BobForGood Reputation

Page 4: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Reputation Insights: BobForGood has a very positive online

reputation.

As the campaign progressed the reputation has

continued to improve

Spike in conversation the 19th February related to

the launch of the campaign

Spike on the 24th related to the Argus Cycle

challenge

Volume of conversation rose quickly but has

been tapering off at an average of 15.72% per

day

Page 5: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Sentiment Distribution

Page 6: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Sentiment Insights: Almost zero negative mentions

Strong emotional response in 70.7% of the

mentions

Remaining 29.23% discussing campaign

positively

This demonstrates the communities willingness

to support an NPO in their personal capacity

Given that there was zero negativity an

increasingly positive social norm was set – hence

the increasingly positive conversation online. This

will assist in

sustaining momentum.

Page 7: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Credibility Distribution

Page 8: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Credibility Insights: Broad distribution of influence of authors

Slightly skewed towards “unknown” but some

authoritative authors do also comment

Reach per author was slightly lower than is

typical for most South African brands although

the difference is not significant.

Page 9: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Media Distribution

Page 10: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Media Insights: Highly skewed towards Consumer conversation

Considerable discussion within the Press

From a public relations perspective the campaign

was very effective and permeated all forms of

media (Press, Consumer and Enterprise)

effectively

Page 11: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Credible Press source

Page 12: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Credible Consumer sources

Page 13: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Domain Distribution

Page 14: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Domain Insights: 71.57% of the conversation was highly

fragmented (i.e. only one or two mentions about

the campaign per site)

Twitter occupied largest percentage (23.84% and

was therefore removed from this graph to

demonstrate off-Twitter conversation)

Bob Skinstad web properties did well to

communicate the campaign itself

Press coverage was strong

Page 15: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Trends diagram

Page 16: Bobs For Good

www.brandseye.com

Additional information

For further information please contact Tim Shier on [email protected] or +27 21 462 7353