bogdanov - msps at x-ray energies

31
Millisecond Pulsars at X-ray Energies Slavko Bogdanov

Upload: dotuong

Post on 27-Dec-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Millisecond Pulsars at

X-ray Energies

Slavko Bogdanov

Page 2: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

In collaboration with:

Scott Ransom (NRAO)

Ingrid Stairs (UBC)

Paulo Freire (MPIfR)

Fernando Camilo (Columbia)

Maura McLaughlin(WVU)

Duncan Lorimer(WVU)

Jason Hessels(ASTRON)

Werner Becker (MPE)

Josh Grindlay (Harvard/CfA)

George Rybicki (Harvard/CfA)

Maureen van den Berg (UvA)

Craig Heinke (U of Alberta)

Vicky Kaspi (McGill)

Anne Archibald (McGill)

Haldan Cohn (Indiana U)

Phyllis Lugger (Indiana U)

Mathieu Servillat (Harvard/CfA)

Page 3: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

� First detected in ROSAT All-Sky Survey- PSR J0437−4715(Becker & Trümper 1993)

� ~10 MSPs detected by ROSAT

� ~50 detected to date with Chandra and XMM-Newton

� Most (~30) detected in deep Chandra

observations of globular clusters

� Very faint X-ray sources (L

X ≤1033 erg s–1,

typical: LX

≈1030–31 erg s–1)

MSPs in X-rays (~0.1−−−−10 keV)

Becker & Trümper (1993)

Page 4: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

47 TucChandra ACIS-S

0.3−6 keV281 ks

Heinke et al. ApJ, 625, 796 (2005)

Bogdanov et al. ApJ, 646, 1104 (2006)

Page 5: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

M28 (NGC 6626)

ACIS–S

0.3–6 keV

237 ks

Bogdanov et al. ApJ, 730, 81 (2011)

Page 6: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

NGC 6397

Chandra ACIS-S

0.3−2 keV

290 ks

D ≈≈≈≈ 2.5 kpcNH ≈≈≈≈ 1 ×××× 1021 cm-2

PSR J1740–5340

U18

Bogdanov et al. ApJ, 709, 241 (2010)

Page 7: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

I - Energetic MSPs

� Ė ≥≥≥≥ 1036 erg s−−−−1 LX ≈≈≈≈ 1033 erg s−−−−1

� Hard, non-thermal radiation

� Narrow pulses

⇒ particle acceleration in magnetosphere

Zavlin AP&SS, 308, 297 (2007)Bogdanov et al. ApJ, 730, 81 (2011)

Page 8: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

PSR J0024–7204W (47 Tuc)

PSR J1740–5340 (NGC 6397)

II - Eclipsing Binary MSPs

� LX ≈≈≈≈ 1031−−−−32 erg s−−−−1

� Hard, non-thermal emission

� Orbital variability

⇒ intra-binary shock due to interaction of pulsar wind with companion

Bogdanov et al. ApJ, 730, 81 (2011)

PSR J1824-2452H

(M28)

Bogdanov et al. ApJ, 709, 241 (2010)

Bogdanov et al. ApJ, 630, 88 (2005)

Page 9: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Eclipsing Binary MSPs: PSR J1023+0038 – “the missing link”

Bogdanov et al. ApJ, 762, 96 (2011)

Chandra ACIS-S

Page 10: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Eclipsing Binary MSPs: PSR J1723−−−−2837

Bogdanov et al. in prep.

Chandra ACIS-S

Page 11: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Eclipsing Binary MSPs

� Pronounced X-ray eclipses due to geometric occultation of intra-binary shock by secondary star

Arons & Tavani, ApJ, 403, 249 (1993)

Page 12: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Bogdanov et al. ApJ, 762, 96 (2011)

� Depth and duration of X-ray eclipses imply a shock localized at face of companion and/or L1.

� Shock luminosity & location constrain pulsar geometry & physics:

• Pulsar wind has to be anisotropic & concentrated in orbital plane

⇒ pulsar spin axis aligned with orbital angular momentum axis

• At shock, wind is magnetically dominated

PSR J1023+0038

Eclipsing Binary MSPs

Page 13: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

III Typical MSPs

� Ė ≈≈≈≈ 1033−−−−34 erg s−−−−1 LX ≈≈≈≈ 1030−−−−31 erg s−−−−1

� Soft, thermal X-rays from Reff ≤≤≤≤ 2 km

� Broad pulses ⇒ surface PC emission

Bogdanov ApJ, 762, 96 (2013)

PSR J0437−4715

Bogdanov & Grindlay ApJ, 703, 1557 (2009)

PSR J0030+0451

XMM–Newton

130 ks

130 ks

Page 14: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

X-rays

� Thermal X-ray emission due to polar cap heating by a return current of

relativistic particles from pulsar magnetosphere

X-rays

� Surface radiation can serve as a valuable probe of neutron star properties

(compactness, B-field geometry, surface composition,…)

Page 15: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Modeling thermal X-ray emission from MSPs

� Ingredients:

- rotating neutron star

- two X-ray emitting hot spots

- general & special relativity * Schwarzschild metric

(or approximation)

* Doppler boosting/aberration

* propagation time delays

- optically thick hydrogen atmosphere

Viironen & Poutanen (2004)

αααα = pulsar obliquity

ζζζζ = ∠∠∠∠ b/w line of sight & pulsar spin axis

φφφφ(t) = rotational phase

θθθθ = photon ∠∠∠∠ w.r.t surface normal

ψψψψ = photon ∠∠∠∠ at infinity

b = photon impact parameter at infinity

ζζζζαααα

θθθθ

ζζζζ

Viironen & Poutanen (2004)

Page 16: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Nollert et al. (1989)

Flat

Schwarzschild

Bending of photon trajectories

For M = 1.4 M�, R = 10 km~80% of the neutron

star surface is visible at a given instant.

Page 17: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Modeling thermal emission from MSPs

Courtesy of G.B. Rybicki

BB

H atm.

• Non-magnetic (B < 1010 G ~ 0 G) Hydrogen Atmosphere:

- harder than blackbody for same effective temperature

- anisotropic emission pattern ⇒ limb-darkening- 100% pure H due to gravitational sedimentation

McClintock, Narayan, & Rybicki (2004)

} Zavlin et al. (1996)

Romani (1987)

Page 18: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Bogdanov, Grindlay, & Rybicki, ApJ, 689, 407 (2008)

Synthetic MSP X-ray pulse profiles- R = 10 km, M = 1.4 M�- Teff = 2 × 106 K (H atmosphere)

- 2 antipodal, point-like polar caps

Thermal X-ray emission is observable for all (α, ζ)

Page 19: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

- P = 4 ms, R = 10 km, M = 1.4 M�

- Teff = 2 × 106 K (H atmosphere)

- 2 antipodal, point-like polar caps

Blackbody

Blackbody + Doppler

H atmosphere

H atmospere + Doppler

- Can determine emission properties of NS surface

(H atm. vs blackbody)

- Can constrain magnetic field and viewing geometries ⇒ input for γ-ray modeling

α=10°, ζ=30°

α=30°, ζ=60°

α=60°, ζ=80°

α=20°, ζ=80°

Model MSP X-ray pulse profiles

Bogdanov, Rybicki, & Grindlay, ApJ, 670, 668 (2007)

Page 20: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

9 km12 km16 km

for M = 1.4 M

* Fits to X-ray pulse profiles of MSPs can be used to infer NS compactness

1 + zg = (1 – 2GM/c2R)–1/2

⇒ constrain NS EOS(Pavlov & Zavlin 1997; Zavlin

& Pavlov 1998)

}

α=10°, ζ=30°

α=30°, ζ=60°

α=60°, ζ=80°

α=20°, ζ=80°

Model MSP X-ray pulse profiles

Bogdanov, Rybicki, & Grindlay, ApJ, 670, 668 (2007)

Page 21: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Lattimer & Prakash (2004)

Page 22: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Probing the EoS of Cold Ultra-dense Matter

Lattimer & Prakash (2004)

Page 23: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

� NH ≈≈≈≈ 2 ×××× 1019 cm–2

� LX = 3 ×××× 1030 ergs s–1

� MPSR = 1.76 ± 0.20 M�

(radio timing; Verbiest et al. 2008)

� D = 156.3 ± 1.3 pc (VLBI; Deller et al. 2008)

PSR J0437−−−−4715

Bogdanov ApJ, 762, 96 (2013)

Page 24: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

PSR J0437−−−−4715

R > 11.1 km (3σσσσ conf.) for M = 1.76 M�

130 ks

- Pulsations inconsistent with blackbody

- Anisotropic emission pattern required ⇒ atmosphere on surface

Bogdanov ApJ, 762, 96 (2013)

Page 25: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

PSR J0437−−−−4715

- Magnetic dipole not centered on star!Bogdanov ApJ, 762, 96 (2013)

Page 26: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

� Solitary MSP

� νννν = 205 Hz � D ≈≈≈≈ 300 pc� NH ≈≈≈≈ 1 ×××× 1020 cm–2

� LX = 4 ×××× 1030 ergs s–1

PSR J0030+0451

Bogdanov & Grindlay, ApJ, 703, 1557 (2009)

R > 10.7 km (95% conf.)

R > 10.4 km (99.9% conf.)

for M = 1.4 M�

Page 27: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

X-ray Emission from MSPs

• Majority of radio MSPs have soft, thermal X-ray spectradue to heated magnetic polar caps (Teff ~ 106 K)

• Eclipsing binary MSPs can constrain pulsar wind physics

• Modeling thermal X-ray Emission: promising method for constraints on elusive NS EOS:

� Non-transient (always “on”) and non-variable

� “Weak” magnetic fields (Bsurf~108–9 G)⇒ B-field does not affect radiativeproperties of atmosphere

� Dominant thermal emission(≥95% of total counts @ 0.1–2 keV)

� Radiation from small fraction of NS surface(Reff ≤ 2 km) ⇒ emission region size and shape important at ≤1% level

� High precision distances (±0.8% for PSR J0437−4715; Deller et al. 2008)⇒ uncertainty in (Reff/D)2 greatly reduced

� Independent, accurate mass measurements possible from radio timing ⇒ unique constraint on RNS

MSPs: important targets for future X-ray missions

Page 28: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Section Title - 28GSFC and partner competition sensitive and proprietary – do not share or copy .

Explorer AO Site Visit

50 phase-resolved spectra

� Dramatic increase in photon statistics (>10-fold for PSR J0437−4715 compared to best available XMM-Newton data) enables use of novel 2-D modeling approach in the E − φ plane.

� ≤5% RNS

measurement in ~1 Ms with NICER

Page 29: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Section Title - 29GSFC and partner competition sensitive and proprietary – do not share or copy .

Explorer AO Site Visit

50 phase-resolved spectra

Page 30: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Pulsed thermal X-ray emission is observable for all

combinations of viewing angle (ζ) and pulsar magnetic inclination (α) due to light bending

Blind X-ray timing searches could discover all nearby MSPs in field and in GCs (with Gen-X?)

Bogdanov, Grindlay, & Rybicki, ApJ, 689, 407 (2008)

Page 31: Bogdanov - MSPs at X-ray Energies

Proof of concept:

Blind discovery of PSR J0437-4715 in acceleration search

in 20 ks Chandra HRC-S observation