8/2/2019 Bond Patricia 4508 Fdbk MERIT

1/3

ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK SHEET

Name Patricia Bond

Group/ Centre Woodlands

Module number/ title CPD: 4508 Inclusive practice for individuals with SEBD

Programme MA Education

Tutor David Armstrong

Date of submission 05/05/2011

8/2/2019 Bond Patricia 4508 Fdbk MERIT

2/3

Learning Outcomes1. Evidence deep knowledge and systematic understanding of the literature, research and legislation

surrounding the inclusion of students with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties.2. Undertake critical analysis, with awareness, of the values, attitudes, principles and practicalities of inclusion

for children/young people with SEBD.3. Evidence deep and systematic understanding and evaluation of a range of techniques and methodologies

used to facilitate inclusion for SEBD.Comments related to the achievement of learning outcomesPart APatricia, the best sections of your submission show a detailed appreciation of the widerissues around the practicalities of inclusion for young people/adults with SEBD. Youremphasis on the views of Fairy and Sam about decisions taken about them by othersadults is very important. It shows your critical perspective on educational practice in theircase and your commitment to them as autonomous adults. You also draw out the wider

weaknesses of ALS/the system of support in your setting indicating your engagement with

8/2/2019 Bond Patricia 4508 Fdbk MERIT

3/3

Student Patricia Bond ID Number21392692

PD Postgraduate Programme Feedback - Generic Assessment Criteria

DistinctionEvidence of

MeritEvidence of

PassEvidence of

Areas for Developmentand/or Resubmission Required

Some revisionEvidence of

Substantialrevision

Evidence of

AcademicKnowledge andUnderstandingof the academicdiscipline, field ofstudy

As Merit plus:

Excellent coverage, offeringsophisticated or originalinsights.A synthesis, possibly, ofdisparate material.

As Pass plus:

An awareness of problemsand insights much of which

is at, or informed by, theforefront of the

discipline/practice.

A systematic understanding of relevant

knowledge.Good identification, selection and understandingof key issues.Awareness of current problems and/or newinsights.Conceptual awareness enabling critical analysis.Accuracy in detail.An understanding of different views.

Coverage of some or most

relevant issues withreasonable understanding.Identification of some or mostcentral issues.Some acknowledgement ofdifferent views but not muchevidence of understanding ofapplication of these.

Paucity of relevant

material in support ofresponse.Areas of controversyignored or notunderstood.

Critical analysisandinterpretation

As Merit plus:

Imaginative, insightful,original or creativeinterpretations.Impressive, sustained levelof analysis and evaluation.

A cogent argument withawareness of limitations.Extensive, well-referencedresearch both in breadth anddepth. Clear and expertcommand over the subjectmatter, offering an originalinterpretation and/orcontribution to the field ofstudy.

As Pass plus:

A command of acceptedcritical positions.Conceptual understandingthat enables the student topropose new hypotheses.

A range in breadth or depthof well-referenced research.

The ability to deal with complex issues bothsystematically and creatively, and make soundjudgements.Consistent analysis and critical evaluation ofcurrent research and advanced scholarship inthe discipline.Consideration of alternative interpretations.

A coherent argument supported by evidence.A good range of reading, beyond core or basictexts, including mostly up-to-date sources, withsources appropriately acknowledged accordingto academic conventions of referencing.

Some ability to deal withcomplex issues.Judgements not all wellsubstantiated.Some evaluation of researchand scholarship.Analysis limited in range and

relatively superficial.The ability to construct anargument may be limited.The range of reading may belimited.Sources not always explicitlyor accurately acknowledged.

Mainly descriptive.Analysis is limited,deriving from limitedsources and/or too limitedto a single perspective.Argument or position notmade clear.

Self-contradiction orconfusion.Inadequate resourcingand/or sourcesinsufficientlyacknowledged.

Criticalreflection:Personal and/orprofessionalapplication andevaluation

As Merit plus:

Sophisticated critical self-evaluation.New insights informingpractical situations.

As Pass plus:

Originality in addressingneeds or specifications,and /or solving problems.

Relevant, appropriate, and explicit links made toprofessional practice.The independent learning ability and self-evaluation required to continue to advance thestudents knowledge and understanding, and todevelop new skills appropriate to a professional

context.

Some relevance and links toprofessional practice. Someexercise of initiative andpersonal or professionalresponsibility but a limitedself-evaluation

No link to professionalpractice.Weakness inindependent learning,decision-making and/orself-evaluation.