book review: hung-chao tal, ed. confucianism and economic development: an oriental alternative?...
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/11/2019 Book Review: HUNG-CHAO TAl, ed. Confucianism and Economic Development: An Oriental Alternative? Washingto
1/4
kJZe /yV/Z/:fot
u w i
f f ' h u t e ~ Jtu
ISSN 0742-5929)
Vol. II
April, 1994
Copyright 1994 .American Association for Chinese Studies
THE
CULTURAL
E.
-
8/11/2019 Book Review: HUNG-CHAO TAl, ed. Confucianism and Economic Development: An Oriental Alternative? Washingto
2/4
April 1994]
OOK R VI WS
125
HIJNC CHAO
TAl,
ed. Confucianism
and
Economic Development
n
Oriental Alternative? Washington,
D.C.:
Washington
Institute, 1989.
x
+
233 pages. $22.95
doth.
Unlike most collections of essays, Confucianism
and
Economic De-
velopment
is
interesting and informative. It does
not
answer the
question of whether
Confucianism
might
serve as an
Oriental
al
ternative to industrialization and modernization along Western
lines,
but
then
the
editor
warned
us that not only did the several
authors in the
collection employ
different
methodologies
and
per
spectives,
they each
a
-
8/11/2019 Book Review: HUNG-CHAO TAl, ed. Confucianism and Economic Development: An Oriental Alternative? Washingto
3/4
126
MERIC NJOURN L
O
CHINESE STUDIES
[Vol.
2:109
ticed
in different Confucian
societies
in different
ways (p. 106).
Not
only
that,
but
within
the
same
society,
the
social
orientation
may
change over
time (p. 107) . Confucianism was selectively
adapted
to meet
the
challenges
of
social, economic and political
change. Thus,
the
empirical data
cited
by Wen-lang Li suggests to
him
that
Taiwanese
entrepreneurs and
their behavior
are
tradition
alistic
in
so far as they
conform
to some
of
Confucius' normative
expectations (p. 129),
meaning that
they have selectively
adapted
Confucianism to
their
needs. There was compliance wherever
Confucian normative enjoinments
were
not
manifestly
dysfunctional.
Siu-Iun
Wong
conceives
the
Chinese as
being eminently
prag
matic
and
their
cosmology as
abundantly
eclectic allowing
them
to
become adept
borrowers
of
foreign practices (p. 169). Hang
sheng Cheng
argues
that
few people [are]
more
down-to-earth
than the
Chinese
and
generalizations based
on philosophy and
ideology are perilous. Although Confucian philosophy has had a
strong
hold
on
the
Chinese
mentality,
the
Chinese
are
remarka
bly pragmatic (p. 60).
We have
then an uncertain
variable,
Chinese or
Confucian cul
ture, conceived as a factor in
the rapid
industrialization
and
eco
nomic
growth
of
Japan
and the
East Asian mini-dragons. It is a
factor
known to
undergo regular mutation and reinterpretation
that must operate in
rapidly changing circumstances. Everything
becomes mercurial and
fugitive.
That
having
been
said,
the
collection
of
essays is a veritable
storehouse
of
information, speculation and suggestive insights.
The
essay by Yuan-Ii Wu and
Hung-chao
Tai,
Economic
Perform
ance in
Five East Asian Countries: A Comparative Analysis, is a
repository of
statistical
information
that
is
enormously helpful in
outlining the phenomenal
rates
of
growth
that
have characterized
the
five economies under consideration.
The
es o;;ay by Kuo-hui Tai,
a study of
the
nea-Confucian fnfluence
of
Shibusawa Eiichi, and
Shibusawa's
subsequent
development
of
a
rationale
for industrial
development in
Japan,
is worth
the price of the
volume.
The
essays
on
the economic
modernization
and
industrialization of
the
Re
public
of China
on Taiwan, by I-ting
Wong
and Wen-lang Li,
each
dealing v rith different
aspects
of the process are dear,
precise
and
insightful. The essays by Young-iob
Chung,
Siu-Iun Wong and
Thomas Bellows on
the
Republic
of
Korea, Hong
Kong
and Singa-
-
8/11/2019 Book Review: HUNG-CHAO TAl, ed. Confucianism and Economic Development: An Oriental Alternative? Washingto
4/4
April 1994]
OOK
R VI VVS
127
pore, respectively, provide the
reader
with a wealth of
information
and
plausible
interpretation.
The collection
dearly
does
not answer the question
of
the
role
of
Confucianism
in the economic performance of the
newly indus-
trialized East
J \. :;ian
nations. We still have
the puzzle of Mainland
China,
the
home of
Confucianism,
enjoying only feeble
economic
growth
and development
before
the
1980s and 1990s, and then un-
dertaking one of
the
most
impressive
contemporary
tr