book review: hung-chao tal, ed. confucianism and economic development: an oriental alternative?...

Upload: sophal-ear

Post on 03-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Book Review: HUNG-CHAO TAl, ed. Confucianism and Economic Development: An Oriental Alternative? Washingto

    1/4

    kJZe /yV/Z/:fot

    u w i

    f f ' h u t e ~ Jtu

    ISSN 0742-5929)

    Vol. II

    April, 1994

    Copyright 1994 .American Association for Chinese Studies

    THE

    CULTURAL

    E.

  • 8/11/2019 Book Review: HUNG-CHAO TAl, ed. Confucianism and Economic Development: An Oriental Alternative? Washingto

    2/4

    April 1994]

    OOK R VI WS

    125

    HIJNC CHAO

    TAl,

    ed. Confucianism

    and

    Economic Development

    n

    Oriental Alternative? Washington,

    D.C.:

    Washington

    Institute, 1989.

    x

    +

    233 pages. $22.95

    doth.

    Unlike most collections of essays, Confucianism

    and

    Economic De-

    velopment

    is

    interesting and informative. It does

    not

    answer the

    question of whether

    Confucianism

    might

    serve as an

    Oriental

    al

    ternative to industrialization and modernization along Western

    lines,

    but

    then

    the

    editor

    warned

    us that not only did the several

    authors in the

    collection employ

    different

    methodologies

    and

    per

    spectives,

    they each

    a

  • 8/11/2019 Book Review: HUNG-CHAO TAl, ed. Confucianism and Economic Development: An Oriental Alternative? Washingto

    3/4

    126

    MERIC NJOURN L

    O

    CHINESE STUDIES

    [Vol.

    2:109

    ticed

    in different Confucian

    societies

    in different

    ways (p. 106).

    Not

    only

    that,

    but

    within

    the

    same

    society,

    the

    social

    orientation

    may

    change over

    time (p. 107) . Confucianism was selectively

    adapted

    to meet

    the

    challenges

    of

    social, economic and political

    change. Thus,

    the

    empirical data

    cited

    by Wen-lang Li suggests to

    him

    that

    Taiwanese

    entrepreneurs and

    their behavior

    are

    tradition

    alistic

    in

    so far as they

    conform

    to some

    of

    Confucius' normative

    expectations (p. 129),

    meaning that

    they have selectively

    adapted

    Confucianism to

    their

    needs. There was compliance wherever

    Confucian normative enjoinments

    were

    not

    manifestly

    dysfunctional.

    Siu-Iun

    Wong

    conceives

    the

    Chinese as

    being eminently

    prag

    matic

    and

    their

    cosmology as

    abundantly

    eclectic allowing

    them

    to

    become adept

    borrowers

    of

    foreign practices (p. 169). Hang

    sheng Cheng

    argues

    that

    few people [are]

    more

    down-to-earth

    than the

    Chinese

    and

    generalizations based

    on philosophy and

    ideology are perilous. Although Confucian philosophy has had a

    strong

    hold

    on

    the

    Chinese

    mentality,

    the

    Chinese

    are

    remarka

    bly pragmatic (p. 60).

    We have

    then an uncertain

    variable,

    Chinese or

    Confucian cul

    ture, conceived as a factor in

    the rapid

    industrialization

    and

    eco

    nomic

    growth

    of

    Japan

    and the

    East Asian mini-dragons. It is a

    factor

    known to

    undergo regular mutation and reinterpretation

    that must operate in

    rapidly changing circumstances. Everything

    becomes mercurial and

    fugitive.

    That

    having

    been

    said,

    the

    collection

    of

    essays is a veritable

    storehouse

    of

    information, speculation and suggestive insights.

    The

    essay by Yuan-Ii Wu and

    Hung-chao

    Tai,

    Economic

    Perform

    ance in

    Five East Asian Countries: A Comparative Analysis, is a

    repository of

    statistical

    information

    that

    is

    enormously helpful in

    outlining the phenomenal

    rates

    of

    growth

    that

    have characterized

    the

    five economies under consideration.

    The

    es o;;ay by Kuo-hui Tai,

    a study of

    the

    nea-Confucian fnfluence

    of

    Shibusawa Eiichi, and

    Shibusawa's

    subsequent

    development

    of

    a

    rationale

    for industrial

    development in

    Japan,

    is worth

    the price of the

    volume.

    The

    essays

    on

    the economic

    modernization

    and

    industrialization of

    the

    Re

    public

    of China

    on Taiwan, by I-ting

    Wong

    and Wen-lang Li,

    each

    dealing v rith different

    aspects

    of the process are dear,

    precise

    and

    insightful. The essays by Young-iob

    Chung,

    Siu-Iun Wong and

    Thomas Bellows on

    the

    Republic

    of

    Korea, Hong

    Kong

    and Singa-

  • 8/11/2019 Book Review: HUNG-CHAO TAl, ed. Confucianism and Economic Development: An Oriental Alternative? Washingto

    4/4

    April 1994]

    OOK

    R VI VVS

    127

    pore, respectively, provide the

    reader

    with a wealth of

    information

    and

    plausible

    interpretation.

    The collection

    dearly

    does

    not answer the question

    of

    the

    role

    of

    Confucianism

    in the economic performance of the

    newly indus-

    trialized East

    J \. :;ian

    nations. We still have

    the puzzle of Mainland

    China,

    the

    home of

    Confucianism,

    enjoying only feeble

    economic

    growth

    and development

    before

    the

    1980s and 1990s, and then un-

    dertaking one of

    the

    most

    impressive

    contemporary

    tr