bookheimer 2003 annual rev. neurosci

33
Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci.

Upload: hayley-ewing

Post on 02-Jan-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci. Phonology in IFG. Gelfand and Bookheimer, Neuron 2002. reverse. delete. match. Results: Normal Children Sentence Judgement Task. Frontal regions 44 inf 44/6 9/6 Exners area 46 45 47 6 medial Temporal regions 41/42 22 21/20 37 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci.

Page 2: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci
Page 3: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci
Page 4: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Phonology in IFGGelfand and Bookheimer, Neuron 2002

Page 5: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

reverse

delete

match

Page 6: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci
Page 7: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Results: Normal ChildrenSentence Judgement Task

Page 8: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Frontal regions44 inf 44/6 9/6 Exners area4645476 medialTemporal regions41/422221/2037Parietal: 40 39

Page 9: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci
Page 10: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Stimulated region

Tumor

Stimulated region

Page 11: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Language 2

• Reading system and reading disorders

• Right hemisphere contributions to language– Prosody– context

Page 12: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Temporal/OccipitalJunction 21/20/37

Superior TemporalGyrus (posterior)42,41;22

Angular Gyrus (39)

Supramarginal Gyrus (40)

Inferior FrontalGyrus

Anatomy of Reading

Page 13: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Reading System

• Major issue in reading: 1 or 2 pathways

• Call this the Dual Route model

• Was controversial before functional imaging- now its pretty well accepted

• Based on differences in acquired alexia errors

Page 14: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Types of Alexia

• Phonologica, literal or Surface– Patients read in a letter-by-letter fashion– They sound out each word– Errors: they can read pronounceable nonsense

words “migbus”; cannot read irregular words like “yacht”

– Damage likely to the visual recognition system in the LH: cant recognize whole words

Page 15: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Alexia cont.

• Alexia type 2: visual, semantic alexia– Can read whole words– Can read irregulars like yacht and pharoah– Cannot read nonsense words– Strong frequency effect- more likely to read common

than uncommon words; better at concrete nouns– Make visual or regularization errors: lit = light;

groal=goal, etc.– Apparently have damage to phonological to

orthographic conversion system or to phonological system

Page 16: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Rarer alexias

• Global alexia: affects all reading. AG lesions or WM exiting visual cortex in LH

• Deep dyslexia: associated with large LH lesions- characterized by global dyslexia with:– Visual errors: gird=“girl”– Derivational errors: architecture= architect– Semantic errors: orchestra=symphony– Superior at reading concrete nouns– Suggested to represent some primitive RH whole word

recognition capabilities

Page 17: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Rarer alexias, cont.

• Alexia without agraphia or occipital alexia:– Most other acquired alexics have impaired writing

similar to reading

– Alexia without agraphia associated with 2 lesions: one in the left occipital cortex and one in the posterior callosum

– Disruption of visual information into the LH reading system. Usually accompanied by a field or quadrant cut

– Can write, but cant read what they write

Page 18: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Developmental dyslexia

• Most are similar to the surface alexic– Difficulty with auditory processing– Poor at grapheme to phoneme conversion– Lousy at reading nonwords– Slow readers; often learn by whole-word

approach

• Rarer, there are visual types and often some with general language difficulties

Page 19: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Dual Routes

• Inferior Route:– Occipital V1-V2-V3-IT-insula/44/47

• Superior Route– V1-V2- AG-ST- IFG 44/6

• Interaction through AG• Writing: includes SMG and Exner’s area

(46/6 anterior to M1 hand)

Page 20: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci
Page 21: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Right hemisphere contributions to language

• Some evidence that early right brain lesions can be more detrimental to language development than LH lesions

• LH may process more rapid information. RH may maintain a context and provide emotional cues to global meaning

• Some evidence that the ear itself is tuned for more rapid auditory information in LH or infants (Sininger 2004 Science).

Page 22: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Prosody Paradigm

• Selective attention/stimulus matched paradigm

• For the 2 prosody conditions: – “Do the sentences sound alike” regardless of

literal meaning

• For the SC condition:– “Do the sentences mean the same thing”

regardless of the sound

Page 23: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Affective prosody vs. others

Page 24: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Linguistic vs. Affective

Page 25: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Linguistic Prosody- Left Affective Prosody- Right

Page 26: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Making Sense of Conversation(R. Caplan and M. Dapretto, 2003)

• Logical Reasoning

– Q: Do you like having fun?

– A: Yes, because it makes me happy.

• Illogical

– Q: Do you like having fun?

– A: No, because it makes me happy. •On-topic

–Q: Do you believe in angels?–A: Yeh, I have my own special angel

•Off-topic (LA)–Q: Do you believe in angels?–A: Yeh, I like to go to camp

Page 27: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Reasoning vs Topic

Normal Adults

Page 28: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Topic vs Reasoning in Normal Adults

Page 29: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Reorganized language in early lesions

• Can see individual patterns using fMRI

• Appears to follow a principle of minimal energetics: only move what is essential to move

Page 30: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Initiates speech on the right; language is on the left

Page 31: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Auditory Naming Task

Patient: LH tumor; R handed, R Brain Speech, Wada confirmed

Page 32: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Rasmussen’s Disease, age 12

LeftRight

Page 33: Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci

Six months post left hemispherectomy