boosting incidental learning and story- telling with ... · graded readers, learners’...

22
Dóczi Brigitta Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem/University Angol Alkalmazott Nyelvészeti Tanszék/ Department of English Applied Linguistics doczi.brigitta @btk.elte.hu 22/23.08.19 1 Boosting incidental learning and story- telling with graded readers and videos

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jan-2021

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Dóczi Brigitta

    Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem/University

    Angol Alkalmazott Nyelvészeti Tanszék/

    Department of English Applied Linguistics

    [email protected]

    22/23.08.191

    Boosting incidental learning and story-

    telling with graded readers and videos

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Introduction

    2

  • Introduction

    Discuss the following questions in pairs or

    small groups.

    1. Do you read (enough)? What? When? In what form?

    2. (What and how much) do your students read?

    3. Is it hard to make them read?

    4. Have you ever used graded readers or short stories in your

    teaching? Why (not)?

    5. If so, did you give them books/stories individually or as a

    group? Why?

    6. If not, what has stopped you or scared you?

    7. What tasks did you use / can you imagine using with a

    book/story?

    3

  • 1 WHAT

    Graded readers, short stories & videos

    • improve reading fluency

    • encourage vocabulary acquisition

    • help to understand how language works

    • increase motivation

    • help us make sense of the world

    • share understanding and tolerance

    • ’Matthew effect’ in reading (Stanovich, 1986)

    4

  • 2 WHY?

    Aspects of knowing a word

    Depth of word knowledge how well we know a word

    Breadth of word knowledge vocabulary size, lexical coverage and frequency

    Lexical fluency the speed and automaticity of access to lexical items (adapted from Daller, Milton & Treffers-Daller, 2010)

  • Treatment of vocabulary according to word frequency

    based on Schmitt & Schmitt (2014)

    Frequency

    band

    high-frequency words

    (0-3,000 words)

    mid-frequency words

    (3,000-9,000 words)

    low-frequency words

    (9,000+)

    Level of

    learners

    from beginner to

    lower-intermediate

    intermediate (3,000-

    4,000 words)

    upper-intermediate,

    advanced

    upper-intermediate,

    advanced

    Type of word

    knowledge

    needed

    recall and recognition recall and recognition recognition

    Type of

    instruction

    recommended

    explicit teaching

    (some incidental

    learning)

    incidental learning +

    explicit teaching

    incidental learning with

    the help of vocabulary

    strategies provided by

    the teacher

    Pedagogical

    tools

    coursebooks,

    word lists,

    form-focused

    instruction,

    graded readers,

    learners’ dictionaries

    coursebooks, graded

    readers,

    TED talks,

    formulaic sequences,

    form-focused

    instruction,

    pattern grammar

    authentic texts with

    vocabulary glosses for

    explanation, text-profiling

    tools (substitution of

    words with more frequent

    ones)

  • Depth of word knowledge

    Comprehensive word knowledge

    (Nation, 2001)

    • word form → spoken form,

    written form, affixes

    • word meaning → connections

    between meaning and form

    • word use → grammatical

    behaviour, collocational

    behaviour, frequency, stylistic

    register constraints

    EXPERIENCE

    translationtapasztalat

    spoken form‘expieriens

    written formexperience

    associationswork, time,

    professional,old, age

    grammatical formnoun

    Other formsto experience,experienced

    Other meaningsélmény,felfedez

    vmit

    ProductiveKnowledge

    Old men have a lot of exp.

    Collocationshave some

    expin sth

  • Incidental learning: benefits

    • involves the use of authentic

    language

    • looks at language in context

    • boosts vocabulary development

    through extensive or narrow

    reading, writing, listening and

    communication

    • increases vocabulary size

    • promotes mainly receptive

    knowledge (word form and meaning

    link strengthened)

    • provides autonomous learning

    experience for the learner

  • Formulaic sequences

    • more than 50% of

    language (Conklin & Schmitt, 2012)

    • pragmatic relevance

    • stored together and

    retrieved quicker

    • better comprehension of

    a given text + more

    natural and fluent

    production

    • ‘Lexical Approach’ (Lewis,

    1993)

    • more encounters,

    substantial exposure, focus

    on noticing of form and

    (literal) meaning

    (Alali & Schmitt, 2012; Boers et al., 2006; Boers, 2013)

  • The interdependence of vocabulary

    and grammar

    • relevance of frequency in

    lexical patterns ‘lexical

    bundles’ Biber et al.,1999)

    • lexis and grammar are

    interdependent and

    inseparable (Römer, 2009)

    • understanding (context),

    accuracy, fluency and

    flexibility (Hunston, Francis & Manning, 1997)

    • word consciousness

    (e.g., grammatical or

    collocational knowledge)

  • Nation’s (2008) four strands for vocabulary instruction,

    Dóczi & Kormos, 2016)

    Type

    of

    instruc

    tion

    Meaning-focused

    input

    Meaning-focused

    output

    Language-

    focused learning

    Vocabulary fluency

    development

    Aim practising listening and reading

    practising

    speaking and writing

    rich vocabulary

    instruction;

    boosting word

    consciousness;

    fostering vocabulary

    strategy use

    strengthening the

    existing links between

    lexical items;

    creating new

    associations through

    reorganizing existing

    knowledge

    How

    to

    achiev

    e it

    graded readers;

    narrow reading;

    movies; sitcoms,

    series on TV

    integrated output

    tasks,

    writing & presenting

    short texts with new

    vocabulary

    focus on depth of

    word knowledge

    through form-

    focused instruction;

    vocabulary strategy

    instruction;

    training on

    dictionary use

    recycling and

    rehearsing familiar

    vocabulary and topics

    11

  • 3 HOW?

    Task-based language teaching - TBLT

    + student-centeredness

    + real world knowledge

    + meaningful language use

    + focus on authenticity

    + language = a tool

    + learning takes place inside and outside class

    + teamwork

    + outcome

    - cannot fully substitute PPP

    - requires a level of independence of the learner(see Ellis, 2003, 2009; Willis, 1996)12

  • 3 HOW?

    Digital story-telling

    + provides opportunity to create tasks that are actually

    engaging to learners

    + motivates students

    + promotes learning outside the classroom

    + Need for authentic materials is served by the vast amount of

    samples of language use available on the Internet.

    13

  • 4 EXAMPLES

    https://elt.oup.com/teachersclub/subjects/grade

    dreading/?cc=us&selLanguage=en&mode=hub

    14

    https://elt.oup.com/teachersclub/subjects/gradedreading/?cc=us&selLanguage=en&mode=hub

  • 4 EXAMPLES

    • bookworms library

    • online level tests (downloadable)

    • book tests

    • worksheets

    • teaching and learning resources

    • blog

    • videos

    15

  • 4 EXAMPLES

    Digital story-telling

    Humans of New York (Facebook)

    https://8ms.com/2013/05/21/6-great-examples-of-digital-storytelling

    Khan Acedemyhttps://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/hass-storytelling/storytelling-pixar-in-a-

    box/ah-piab-we-are-all-storytellers/v/storytelling-introb

    Film English

    http://film-english.com/tag/efl-video/

    Inspirational stories

    http://www.inspiremykids.com/

    https://ed.ted.com/

    https://www.weforum.org/videos/archive/

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV3Nm3T-XAgVhKH9jT0ViRg/featured

    https://www.youtube.com/user/TestTubeNetwork16

    https://8ms.com/2013/05/21/6-great-examples-of-digital-storytellinghttps://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/hass-storytelling/storytelling-pixar-in-a-box/ah-piab-we-are-all-storytellers/v/storytelling-introbhttp://film-english.com/tag/efl-video/http://www.inspiremykids.com/https://ed.ted.com/https://www.weforum.org/videos/archive/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV3Nm3T-XAgVhKH9jT0ViRg/featuredhttps://www.youtube.com/user/TestTubeNetwork

  • 4 EXAMPLES

    Mini sagas

    17

  • Conclusion

    GRs, short stories and videos provide

    • an enriched lexical environment, varied and systematic

    exposure

    • focused and repeated encounters of words

    • autonomous learning with guidance

    • formulaic language and lexical bundles on the right level

    • Matthew effect

    • motivation and a sense of achievement

    • personal development

    • input and a chance for output

    18

  • THANK YOU FOR YOUR

    ATTENTION!

    Dóczi Brigitta

    Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem/University

    Angol Alkalmazott Nyelvészeti Tanszék/Department of English

    Applied Linguistics

    [email protected]

  • More links

    20

    https://elt.oup.com/teachersclub/subjects/gradedreading/?cc=hu&selLangua

    ge=hu&mode=hub

    https://www.fluentu.com/blog/educator-english/short-stories-for-esl-students/

    https://owlcation.com/academia/Very-Short-Stories-For-High-School

    https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/using-graded-readers

    https://oupeltglobalblog.com/2018/10/24/the-novella/

    https://www.audible.co.uk/search?advsearchKeywords=Bookworms&WT.ac

    =oxford-bookworms-audio-books

    https://www.wevideo.com/blog/for-schools/3-powerful-examples-of-digital-

    storytelling-to-amplify-student-voice

    https://goinswriter.com/tell-story/

    https://beoutsideofthebox.wordpress.com/how-to-write-a-mini-saga/

    https://www.storylineonline.net/

    http://aj3000.com/wp/free-graded-readers/

    https://elt.oup.com/teachersclub/subjects/gradedreading/?cc=hu&selLanguage=hu&mode=hubhttps://www.fluentu.com/blog/educator-english/short-stories-for-esl-students/https://owlcation.com/academia/Very-Short-Stories-For-High-Schoolhttps://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/using-graded-readershttps://oupeltglobalblog.com/2018/10/24/the-novella/https://www.audible.co.uk/search?advsearchKeywords=Bookworms&WT.ac=oxford-bookworms-audio-bookshttps://www.wevideo.com/blog/for-schools/3-powerful-examples-of-digital-storytelling-to-amplify-student-voicehttps://goinswriter.com/tell-story/https://beoutsideofthebox.wordpress.com/how-to-write-a-mini-saga/https://www.storylineonline.net/http://aj3000.com/wp/free-graded-readers/

  • References 1

    21

    Alali, F., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Teaching formulaic sequences: The same or different from

    teaching single words? TESOL Journal 3 (2), 153-180.

    Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar

    of spoken and written English. London, UK: Longman.

    Boulton, A. (2011). Data-driven learning: The perpetual enigma. In S. Goźdź Roszkowski (Ed.),

    Explorations across languages and corpora (pp. 563-580). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of

    Applied Linguistics, 32, 45-61.

    Daller, M., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.). (2010). Modelling and assessing vocabulary

    knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Dóczi, B., & Kormos, J. (2016). Longitudinal developments in vocabulary knowledge and lexical

    organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Ellis, R. (2009), Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings.

    International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246.

  • References 2

    22

    Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK:

    Cambridge University Press.

    Nation, I.S.P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Techniques and strategies. Boston:

    Heinle.

    Römer, U. (2009). The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic

    perspectives . Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 141-163.

    Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size

    in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47, 484-503.

    Stanovich, Keith E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of

    individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly,

    22, 360-407.

    Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.