bound state in a quark model

5
Dynamical study of the Xð3915Þ as a D D bound state in a quark model Youchang Yang 1,2 and Jialun Ping 1, * 1 Department of Physics, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, People’s Republic of China 2 Department of Physics, Zunyi Normal College, Zunyi 563002, People’s Republic of China (Received 14 April 2010; published 16 June 2010) Considering the coupling of color 1 1 and 8 8 structures, we calculate the energy of the newly observed Xð3915Þ as an S-wave D D state in the Bhaduri, Cohler, and Nogami quark model by the Gaussian expansion method. Because of the color coupling, the bound state of D D with J PC ¼ 0 þþ is found, which is well consonant with the experimental data of the Xð3915Þ. The bound states of B B with J PC ¼ 0 þþ and 2 þþ are also predicted in this work. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.114025 PACS numbers: 12.39.Jh, 14.40.Lb, 14.40.Nd I. INTRODUCTION Very recently, the Belle Collaboration reported the new- est charmoniumlike state, the Xð3915Þ, which is observed in ! !J=c with a statistical significance of 7:7' [15]. It has the mass M ¼ 3915 3 2 MeV and width ¼ 17 10 3 MeV. The Belle Collaboration deter- mined the Xð3915Þ production rate ðXð3915ÞÞBðXð3915Þ! !J=c Þ¼ 61 17 8 eV (1) or ðXð3915ÞÞBðXð3915Þ! !J=c Þ¼ 18 5 2 eV; (2) for J P ¼ 0 þ or 2 þ , respectively. The Xð3915Þ is similar to the previously discovered Yð3940Þ by Belle and confirmed by the BABAR Collaboration in the process B ! KYð3940Þ, Yð3940Þ! !J=c [6,7]. The mass and width of the Yð3940Þ obtained by Belle are M ¼ 3943 11ðstatÞ 13ðsystÞ MeV and ¼ 87 22ðstatÞ 26ðsystÞ MeV, respectively [6]. However, BABAR obtained M ¼ 3914:6 þ3:8 3:4 ðstatÞ 2:0ðsystÞ MeV and ¼ 34 þ12 8 ðstatÞ 5ðsystÞ MeV [7]. The difference of the mass and width of Yð3940Þ might be the attribute to the large data sample used by BABAR (350 fb 1 compared to Belle’s 253 fb 1 ), which enabled them to use smaller !J=c mass bins in their analysis [2,3]. The Yð3940Þ and Xð3915Þ have the same mass and width and are both seen in !J=c . Hence they might be same states pointed out in Refs. [15]. The Xð3915Þ as a conventional c c charmonium interpre- tation is disfavored [13]. The mass of this state is well above the threshold of D D or D D [8]; hence open charm decay modes would dominate, while the !J=c decay rates are essentially negligible, which is the same as Y ð3940Þ [9]. However, according to the production rate obtained by Belle [Eqs. (1) and (2)], we obtain the !J=c O (1 MeV) if we assume O (12 keV), which is typical for an excited charmonium state [1013]. !J=c O (1 MeV) is an order of magnitude higher than typical rates between known charmonium states, which implies that there is an intricate structure for the Xð3915Þ. In our previous study [14], the quantum number and mass of 1 0 ð2 3 P 0 Þ are compatible with the Xð3915Þ. However, the calculated strong decay width is much larger than experi- mental data. Hence, the assignment of Xð3915Þ to the charmonium 1 0 ð2 3 P 0 Þ state is very unlikely. In the previous work, Liu and co-workers [15,16] sug- gested Yð3940Þ is probably a molecular D D state with J PC ¼ 0 þþ or J PC ¼ 2 þþ in a meson-exchange model. Assuming the D D bound-state structure, Branz, Gutsche, and Lyubovitskij [17] studied the strong Yð3940Þ! !J=c and radiative Yð3940Þ! decay widths in a phenomenological Lagrangian approach. Their results are roughly compatible with the experimental data about Yð3940Þ. By the QCD sum rules, Zhang and Huang [18] also obtained the mass M ¼ 3:91 0:11 GeV for D D , which is consistent with Yð3940Þ reported by BABAR. Using the SU(3) chiral quark model and solving the resonating group method equation, Liu and Zhang [19] also studied molecular D D states with color-singlet meson-meson structure; the bound state of D D may appear if the vector meson exchange between light quark and antiquark is considered. Although at present the data for the Xð3915Þ and Yð3940Þ are still preliminary, and whether the Xð3915Þ is the same as the Yð3940Þ needs to be identified, it is worth- while to discuss its possible assignments, especially in view of the great potential of finding new particles. We assume the Xð3915Þ and Yð3940Þ as the same state in the following study. In this work we study the Xð1915Þ with D D structure by taking into account the coupling of different color structures in the Bhaduri, Cohler, and Nogami (BCN) quark model, since the color-singlet tetra- quark state ðc qÞ ð cqÞ can consist of colorless or colored ðc qÞ and ð cqÞ two-quark mesons. The role of the hidden color in qq q q (q ¼ u; d) has been discussed by Brink * [email protected] PHYSICAL REVIEW D 81, 114025 (2010) 1550-7998= 2010=81(11)=114025(5) 114025-1 Ó 2010 The American Physical Society

Upload: jialun

Post on 03-Feb-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: bound state in a quark model

Dynamical study of the Xð3915Þ as aD� �D� bound state in a quark model

Youchang Yang1,2 and Jialun Ping1,*1Department of Physics, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, People’s Republic of China

2Department of Physics, Zunyi Normal College, Zunyi 563002, People’s Republic of China(Received 14 April 2010; published 16 June 2010)

Considering the coupling of color 1 � 1 and 8 � 8 structures, we calculate the energy of the newly

observed Xð3915Þ as an S-wave D� �D� state in the Bhaduri, Cohler, and Nogami quark model by the

Gaussian expansion method. Because of the color coupling, the bound state of D� �D� with JPC ¼ 0þþ is

found, which is well consonant with the experimental data of the Xð3915Þ. The bound states of B� �B� withJPC ¼ 0þþ and 2þþ are also predicted in this work.

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.114025 PACS numbers: 12.39.Jh, 14.40.Lb, 14.40.Nd

I. INTRODUCTION

Very recently, the Belle Collaboration reported the new-est charmoniumlike state, the Xð3915Þ, which is observedin �� ! !J=c with a statistical significance of 7:7� [1–5]. It has the mass M ¼ 3915� 3� 2 MeV and width� ¼ 17� 10� 3 MeV. The Belle Collaboration deter-mined the Xð3915Þ production rate

���ðXð3915ÞÞBðXð3915Þ ! !J=c Þ ¼ 61� 17� 8 eV

(1)

or

���ðXð3915ÞÞBðXð3915Þ ! !J=c Þ ¼ 18� 5� 2 eV;

(2)

for JP ¼ 0þ or 2þ, respectively. The Xð3915Þ is similar tothe previously discovered Yð3940Þ by Belle and confirmedby the BABAR Collaboration in the process B !KYð3940Þ, Yð3940Þ ! !J=c [6,7]. The mass and widthof the Yð3940Þ obtained by Belle are M ¼ 3943�11ðstatÞ � 13ðsystÞ MeV and � ¼ 87� 22ðstatÞ�26ðsystÞ MeV, respectively [6]. However, BABAR obtainedM ¼ 3914:6þ3:8

�3:4ðstatÞ � 2:0ðsystÞ MeV and � ¼34þ12

�8 ðstatÞ � 5ðsystÞ MeV [7]. The difference of the

mass and width of Yð3940Þ might be the attribute to thelarge data sample used by BABAR (350 fb�1 compared toBelle’s 253 fb�1), which enabled them to use smaller!J=c mass bins in their analysis [2,3]. The Yð3940Þ andXð3915Þ have the samemass and width and are both seen in!J=c . Hence they might be same states pointed out inRefs. [1–5].

The Xð3915Þ as a conventional c �c charmonium interpre-tation is disfavored [1–3]. The mass of this state is wellabove the threshold of D �D or D �D� [8]; hence open charmdecay modes would dominate, while the!J=c decay ratesare essentially negligible, which is the same as Yð3940Þ [9].However, according to the production rate obtained byBelle [Eqs. (1) and (2)], we obtain the �!J=c �O

(1 MeV) if we assume ��� �O (1–2 keV), which is

typical for an excited charmonium state [10–13]. �!J=c �O (1 MeV) is an order of magnitude higher than typicalrates between known charmonium states, which impliesthat there is an intricate structure for the Xð3915Þ. In ourprevious study [14], the quantum number and mass of�0ð23P0Þ are compatible with the Xð3915Þ. However, thecalculated strong decay width is much larger than experi-mental data. Hence, the assignment of Xð3915Þ to thecharmonium �0ð23P0Þ state is very unlikely.

In the previous work, Liu and co-workers [15,16] sug-gested Yð3940Þ is probably a molecular D� �D� state withJPC ¼ 0þþ or JPC ¼ 2þþ in a meson-exchange model.Assuming the D� �D� bound-state structure, Branz,Gutsche, and Lyubovitskij [17] studied the strongYð3940Þ ! !J=c and radiative Yð3940Þ ! �� decaywidths in a phenomenological Lagrangian approach.Their results are roughly compatible with the experimentaldata about Yð3940Þ. By the QCD sum rules, Zhang andHuang [18] also obtained the mass M ¼ 3:91� 0:11 GeVfor D� �D�, which is consistent with Yð3940Þ reported byBABAR. Using the SU(3) chiral quark model and solvingthe resonating group method equation, Liu and Zhang [19]also studied molecular D� �D� states with color-singletmeson-meson structure; the bound state of D� �D� mayappear if the vector meson exchange between light quarkand antiquark is considered.Although at present the data for the Xð3915Þ and

Yð3940Þ are still preliminary, and whether the Xð3915Þ isthe same as the Yð3940Þ needs to be identified, it is worth-while to discuss its possible assignments, especially inview of the great potential of finding new particles. Weassume the Xð3915Þ and Yð3940Þ as the same state in thefollowing study. In this work we study the Xð1915Þ withD� �D� structure by taking into account the coupling ofdifferent color structures in the Bhaduri, Cohler, andNogami (BCN) quark model, since the color-singlet tetra-quark state ðc �qÞ�ð �cqÞ� can consist of colorless or coloredðc �qÞ� and ð �cqÞ� two-quark mesons. The role of the hiddencolor in qq� �q �q (q ¼ u; d) has been discussed by Brink*[email protected]

PHYSICAL REVIEW D 81, 114025 (2010)

1550-7998=2010=81(11)=114025(5) 114025-1 � 2010 The American Physical Society

Page 2: bound state in a quark model

and Stancu [20] and then extended to study other four-quark systems [21–23].

The BCN quark model was proposed by Bhaduri,Cohler, and Nogami [24]. In this model, the interactionbetween the quark pair is composed of linear color con-finement, color Coulomb, and color magnetic interactionfrom one-gluon exchange. This model has been widelyused to study q �q meson, qqq baryon, [25] and four-quarksystems [21,26–28] that range from light quark u, d toheavy quark b with the same set of parameters. The stateðc �qÞ�ð �cqÞ� bound by a one-gluon exchange interaction inthe BCN quark model can be depicted in Fig. 1. One-gluonexchange interaction exists between pairs of quark-quarkor quark-antiquark in color structure 8 � 8, while no inter-action exists between meson-meson in color structure 1 �1. Hence there is no bound state in Fig. 1(a). However, thebound state is possible within a hidden color channel [colorstructure 8 � 8, Fig. 1(b)].

The numerical method, which is able to provide reliablesolutions, is very important for calculating the energy offew-body systems. In this work, the spectra of normal andexotic mesons are obtained by solving the Schrodingerequation using a variational method: Gaussian expansionmethod (GEM), which is a high precision numericalmethod for few-body systems. The details about GEMcan be seen in Refs. [23,29].

The paper is organized as follows. In the next section weshow the Hamiltonian and parameters of the BCN quarkmodel. Section III is devoted to discussing the wave func-tion of Xð3915Þ and similar state XB with the c quarkreplaced by the b quark. In Sec. IV, we present and analyzethe results obtained by our calculation. Finally, the sum-mary of the present work is given in the last section.

II. HAMILTONIAN

The Hamiltonian of the BCN model takes the form

H ¼ X4i¼1

�mi þ p2

i

2mi

�� Tc:m: þ

X4j>i¼1

ðVCij þ VG

ij Þ; (3)

with

VGij ¼

�ci � �c

j

4

��

rij� �

mimj

e�rij=r0

r20rij�i � �j

�; (4)

VCij ¼ �c

i � �cjð�acrij ��Þ; (5)

where rij ¼ jri � rjj and Tc:m: is the kinetic energy of

central mass of the whole system. � and � are the SU(2)Pauli and the SU(3) Gell-Mann matrices, respectively. The� should be replaced by ��� for the antiquark. The uni-versal parameters of this model [24,27] are listed in Table I.

III. WAVE FUNCTION

The total wave function of the four-quark system can bewritten as

�I;IzJ;Jz

¼ j�ij�iIIz�JJz ; (6)

with

�JJz ¼ ½j�iS � j�iLT�JJz ;

where j�i, j�iI, j�iS, and j�iLTrepresent the color singlet,

isospin with I, spin with S, and spatial with angular mo-mentum LT wave functions, respectively.Because the Xð3915Þ is observed in the invariant mass

spectrum of J=c! in �� ! J=c! [1], the flavor wavefunction of the possible bound states is

Xð3915Þ ¼ 1ffiffiffi2

p ð �D0�D0� þD��Dþ�Þ: (7)

The similar state composed of the b quark is

XB ¼ 1ffiffiffi2

p ð �B0�B0� þ B��Bþ�Þ: (8)

The spatial structures of the above states are pictured inFig. 2. The relative coordinates are defined as follows:

FIG. 1. The ðc �qÞ�ð �cqÞ� bound state by a one-gluon exchangeinteraction in color structures 1 � 1 (a) and 8 � 8 (b) in the BCNquark model. The darkened and open circles represent quarksand antiquarks, respectively.

TABLE I. Parameters of the BCN model.

Quark masses mu;d (MeV) 337

ms (MeV) 600

mc (MeV) 1870

mb (MeV) 5259

Confinement ac (MeV fm�1) 176.738

� (MeV) �171:25One-gluon exchange � 0.390 209

r0 (fm) 0.4545

YOUCHANG YANG AND JIALUN PING PHYSICAL REVIEW D 81, 114025 (2010)

114025-2

Page 3: bound state in a quark model

r ¼ r1 � r2; R ¼ r3 � r4; (9)

� ¼ m1r1 þm2r2m1 þm2

�m3r3 þm4r4m3 þm4

; (10)

and the coordinate of the center of mass is

R cm ¼ X4i¼1

miri

�X4i¼1

mi; (11)

where mi is the mass of the ith quark.By GEM, the outer products of space and spin are

�JJz ¼ ½½�GlmðrÞ�s1ms1

�J1M1

�½c GLMðRÞ�s2ms2

�J2M2�J12M12

’G�ðÞ�JJz : (12)

The total angular momentum is 0 or 2 suggested by theBelle Collaboration [1].

Three relative motion wave functions are written as

�GlmðrÞ ¼

Xnmax

n¼1

cnNnlrle��nr

2YlmðrÞ; (13)

c GLMðRÞ ¼ XNmax

N¼1

cNNNLRLe��NR

2YLMðRÞ; (14)

’G�ð�Þ ¼

X max

¼1

c N e�!

2Y�ð�Þ: (15)

Gaussian size parameters are taken as the geometric pro-gression

�n ¼ 1

r2n; rn ¼ r1a

n�1; a ¼�rnmax

r1

�ð1=ðnmax�1ÞÞ:

(16)

The expression of �N and ! in Eqs. (14) and (15) issimilar to Eq. (16).

The physical state must be a color singlet, so the colorwave functions of the possible four-quark state can beconstructed by the following color structures:

j�1i ¼ j112 � 134i; j�2i ¼ j812 � 834i: (17)

Clearly, it includes a color singlet-singlet and a color octet-octet state. The latter are called hidden color states byanalogy to states which appear in the nucleon-nucleonproblem [30].

IV. NUMERICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Using GEM and the universal model parameters listed inTable I, we also calculate the mass of a normal mesoncomposed of a quark-antiquark by solving the Schrodingerequation

ðH � EÞ�I;IzJ;Jz

¼ 0 (18)

with the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle. The results ofthe meson spectra are converged with the number ofGaussians nmax ¼ 7, and the relative distance of quark-antiquark ranges from 0.1 to 2 fm, which is determined bythe convergence properties of the energies and discussed indetail in Ref. [23]. The calculated results are listed inTable II, which are in good agreement with the experimen-tal data.Because the threshold of the four-quark system is gov-

erned by two corresponding meson masses, so a good fit ofmeson spectra, with the same parameters used in four-

TABLE II. The normal meson spectra (MeV) in the BCNmodel. The last column is taken from Particle Data Groupcompilation [8], and the ground state of bottom �bð1sÞ isobserved by the BABAR Collaboration from the radiative tran-sition �ð3SÞ ! ��b [31].

Meson BCN Exp.

� 137.5 139:57� 0:000 35K 521.4 493:677� 0:016ð770Þ 779.6 775:49� 0:34K�ð892Þ 907 896:00� 0:25!ð782Þ 779.6 782:65� 0:12�ð1020Þ 1018.5 1019:422� 0:02�cð1sÞ 3040 2980:3� 1:2J=c ð1sÞ 3098 3096:916� 0:011D0 1886.7 1864:84� 0:17D� 2021.3 2006:97� 0:19Ds 1997 1968:49� 0:34D�

s 2102.3 2112:3� 0:5B� 5302 5279:15� 0:31B0 5302 5279:53� 0:33B� 5351.5 5325:1� 0:5B0s 5373.1 5366:3� 0:6

B�s 5414.5 5412:8� 1:3

�bð1sÞ 9422.2 9388:9þ3:1�2:3ðstatÞ

�ð1sÞ 9439.5 9460:30� 0:26

FIG. 2. The relative coordinate of a four-quark state. Thedarkened and open circles represent quarks and antiquarks,respectively.

DYNAMICAL STUDY OF THE Xð3915Þ AS A . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW D 81, 114025 (2010)

114025-3

Page 4: bound state in a quark model

quark calculations, must be the most important criterion[21,26,27,32,33]. Therefore, the universal model parame-ters are also employed in this work to study the possiblefour-quark bound state of the Xð3915Þ and XB.

Using GEM with the numbers of Gaussians ¼ 12,n ¼ 7, N ¼ 7, and the magnitude of � ranges from 0.1 to6 fm, and 0.1 to 2 fm for r andR, respectively, in Eqs. (13)–(15), we obtain converged results for the four-quark sys-tems, which are also discussed in detail in Ref. [23]. Bytaking the coupling of the color singlet and octet intoaccount, the total energies of the possible four-quark statementioned above are listed in Table III.

The D� �D� with JPC ¼ 0þþ is bound and in good agree-ment with the mass of the Xð3915Þ and Ref. [18], while theJPC ¼ 2þþ with same flavor wave function is unbound.The results can be understood as follows. For convenience,the matrix elements of color operator are given in Table IV,where the ði; jÞ (j > i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4) are the indices of quarkpairs. The matrix elements of the spin operator for inter-acting quark pairs ði; jÞ are ðð1; 2Þ; ð3; 4Þ; ð1; 3Þ;ð2; 4Þ; ð1; 4Þ; ð2; 3ÞÞ ¼ ð1; 1;�2;�2;�2;�2Þ andð1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1Þ for JPC ¼ 0þþ and 2þþ, respectively. Forthe color singlet-singlet channel, because of no interactionbetween D� and �D�, the calculated energies of D� �D� mustconverged to the threshold, the sum of the mass of D� and�D�; the distances between two quarks (or antiquarks)residing in the different color singlets are much largerthan that of a quark and antiquark in the same color singlet.The results are demonstrated in Tables III and V. For thehidden color channel, according to the confinement inter-action in Eq. (5) and color matrix element listed inTable IV, the interactions between quark-antiquark pairs

ð1; 2Þ and ð3; 4Þ are repulsive, and anticonfinement appears[34]. However, the other four pairwise interactions are stillattractive which govern the confinement of the whole four-quark system. The distance between quark-antiquark pairð1; 2Þ or ð3; 4Þ is the competition result of the interactionbetween particle 1; 2 or ð3; 4Þ and that between 1; 3, 1; 4,2; 3, and 2; 4. The distances are converged to values givenin Table V, and the energy of the four-quark system is alsostable (see Table III). The color magnetic interactions arealso important in the hidden color channel. For the statewith JPC ¼ 0þþ, the contributions from color magneticinteraction �ð�c

i � �cjÞð�i � �jÞ of each particle pair are all

attractive. Hence, in the hidden color channel the energy ofD� �D� with JPC ¼ 0þþ is lower than the state with JPC ¼2þþ, where the contributions from color magnetic interac-tion for particle pairs ð1; 2Þ and ð3; 4Þ are attractive, whilethose for the other four particle pairs are repulsive. Thechannel coupling increases the difference further, becausethe cross matrix elements between the color singlet-singletand color octet-octet with JPC ¼ 0þþ is 2 times larger thanwith JPC ¼ 2þþ.From Table III, one can see that the B� �B� with JPC ¼

0þþ and 2þþ are both bound states. The appearance of thestate B� �B� with JPC ¼ 2þþ is due to the larger mass of theb quark than the c quark, the kinetic energy of former islower than the latter, and the repulsive color magneticinteraction in B� �B� is also small (the interaction is in-versely proportional to the square of quark mass) in thehidden color channel, which leads to the energy below thethreshold of B� �B�.

V. SUMMARY

In summary, we have studied the possible four-quarkstates of Xð3915Þ and similar state XB with the b quarkreplacing the c quark by taking into consideration thecoupling of different color structures in the BCN model.In the quark model, there is no net interaction between twocolor-singlet mesons. To form the bound state, the hiddencolor channel must be introduced. By considering thehidden color channel and the coupling between the color-singlet channel and the hidden color channel, boundedstates D� �D� and B� �B� are obtained. In our calculation,

TABLE III. The energy of the possible four-quark states. Eth

and E4q are the threshold and total energy of the four-quark state,

respectively. The ‘‘cc’’ stands for channel coupling of colorstructures 1 � 1 and 8 � 8.

State JPC Eth (MeV) E4q (MeV)

1 � 1 8 � 8 cc

D� �D� 0þþ 4042.6 4043.6 3941.9 3912.1

2þþ 4042.6 4043.6 4200.3 4043.6

B� �B� 0þþ 10 703 10 703.4 10 388.74 10 298.5

2þþ 10 703 10 703.4 10 609.83 10 535.1

TABLE IV. Color matrix elements h�kj�ci � �c

j j�li, with j >i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4. Here j�ki and j�li, with k; l ¼ 1; 2, represent thecolor wave functions defined in Eq. (17).

ði; jÞ ¼ (1,2) (3,4) (1,3) (2,4) (1,4) (2,3)

ðk; lÞ ¼ ð1; 1Þ � 163 � 16

3 0 0 0 0

ðk; lÞ ¼ ð2; 2Þ 23

23 � 4

3 � 43 � 14

3 � 143

ðk; lÞ ¼ ð1; 2Þ 0 0ffiffiffiffi329

q ffiffiffiffi329

q�

ffiffiffiffi329

q�

ffiffiffiffi329

q

TABLE V. The distances between each quark pair in theconfiguration of D� �D� in different color structures. rij stands

forffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffihr2iji

q(j > i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4) in this form (unit: fm).

JPC Color structure r12 r34 r13 r24 r14 r23

0þþ 1 � 1 0.65 0.65 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.7

8 � 8 0.7 0.7 0.69 0.69 0.36 0.91

Coupling 0.71 0.71 0.69 0.69 0.36 0.91

2þþ 1 � 1 0.65 0.65 6.63 6.63 6.6 6.6

8 � 8 0.8 0.8 0.78 0.78 0.39 1.03

Coupling 0.65 0.65 6.62 6.62 6.59 6.64

YOUCHANG YANG AND JIALUN PING PHYSICAL REVIEW D 81, 114025 (2010)

114025-4

Page 5: bound state in a quark model

the Xð3915Þ can be interpreted as D� �D� with JPC ¼ 0þþ,which is in agreement with the discussion in Refs. [3,14–18].

Since the experimental data about the Xð3915Þ are pre-liminary, further confirmation by other experimental col-laborations is necessary. The role of the hidden color canbe tested in a multiquark system if the Xð3915Þ is identifiedas a bound state D� �D� with JPC ¼ 0þþ. At present, weonly have a limited understanding for the puzzling stateXð3915Þ. A systematical study of the role of hidden color indifferent four-quark configurations will help us to under-

stand the effects of hidden color configurations. The workis in progress.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is supported partly by the National ScienceFoundation of China under Contract No. 10775072, theResearch Fund for the Doctoral Program of HigherEducation of China under Grants No. 20070319007 andNo. 1243211601028, and the Science Foundation ofGuizhou Provincial Education Department under GrantNo. 20090054.

[1] S. Uehara et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 092001 (2010).

[2] S. L. Olsen, arXiv:0909.2713.[3] C. Z. Yuan et al. (BES and Belle Collaborations),

arXiv:0910.3138.[4] A. Zupanc et al. (Belle Collaboration), arXiv:0910.3404.[5] Stephen Gordfrey, arXiv:0910.3409.[6] S.-K. Cho et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94,

182002 (2005).[7] B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.

101, 082001 (2008).[8] C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 667, 1

(2008).[9] E. Eichten, S. Godfrey, H. Mahlke, and J. L. Rosner, Rev.

Mod. Phys. 80, 1161 (2008); S. Godfrey and S. L. Olsen,Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 58, 51 (2008).

[10] D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V.O. Galkin, Mod. Phys. Lett.A 18, 601 (2003).

[11] C. R. Munz, Nucl. Phys. A609, 364 (1996).[12] A.M. Badalian and I. V. Danilkin, Phys. At. Nucl. 72,

1206 (2009).[13] Bai-Qing Li, Ce Meng, and Kuang-Ta Chao, Phys. Rev. D

80, 014012 (2009).[14] Youchang Yang, Zurong Xia, and Jialun Ping, Phys. Rev.

D 81, 094003 (2010).[15] X. Liu, Z. G. Luo, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C

61, 411 (2009).[16] X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 80, 017502 (2009).[17] T. Branz, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Phys. Rev. D

80, 054019 (2009).[18] Jian-Rong Zhang and Ming-Qiu Huang, Phys. Rev. D 80,

056004 (2009).[19] Yan-Rui Liu and Zong-Ye Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 80, 015208

(2009).[20] D.M. Brink and Fl. Stancu, Phys. Rev. D 49, 4665 (1994).[21] D.M. Brink and Fl. Stancu, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6778 (1998);

Fl. Stancu, arXiv:hep-ph/0607077v2; arXiv:0906.2485.[22] H. Hogaasen, J.M. Richard, and P. Sorba, Phys. Rev. D 73,

054013 (2006); F. Buccella, H. Hogaasen, J.-M. Richard,and P. Sorba, Eur. Phys. J. C 49, 743 (2007).

[23] Youchang Yang, Chengrong Deng, Jialun Ping, and T.Goldman, Phys. Rev. D 80, 114023 (2009).

[24] R. K. Bhaduri, L. E. Cohler, and Y. Nogami, NuovoCimento A 65, 376 (1981).

[25] B. Silvestre-Brac and C. Gignoux, Phys. Rev. D 32, 743(1985).

[26] B. Silvestre-Brac and C. Semay, Z. Phys. C 57, 273(1993); 59, 457 (1993).

[27] D. Janc and M. Rosina, Few-Body Syst. 35, 175 (2004).[28] A. Del Fabbro, D. Janc, M. Rosina, and D. Treleani, Phys.

Rev. D 71, 014008 (2005).[29] E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Prog. Part. Nucl.

Phys. 51, 223 (2003).[30] Fan Wang, Jialun Ping, and Hongxia Huang,

arXiv:0903.4349.[31] B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.

101, 071801 (2008); P. Grenieret, arXiv:0809.1672.[32] J. Weinstein and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 659 (1982);

Phys. Rev. D 27, 588 (1983); 41, 2236 (1990).[33] A. V. Manohar and M.B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B399, 17

(1993).[34] V. Dmitrasinovic, Phys. Rev. D 67, 114007 (2003).

DYNAMICAL STUDY OF THE Xð3915Þ AS A . . . PHYSICAL REVIEW D 81, 114025 (2010)

114025-5